This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!
This theory is based on two postulates
1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself
2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w- function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!
• Heisenberg’s principle says that the position and the momentum of an electron cannot be determined at the same time. The problem with this idea is that distance multiplied by momentum cannot result energy as in his dx*dp>=h/4pi equation. It's a blunder. In addition the momentum can be well determined when electrons hit an object or can be watched in cloud chambers. Electrons can behave like waves similar to water or air but to show one electron like fog is absurd. Bohr’s model cannot be saved
Nice video!
This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!
This theory is based on two postulates
1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself
2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w- function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!
nickharvey7 3 months ago
• Heisenberg’s principle says that the position and the momentum of an electron cannot be determined at the same time. The problem with this idea is that distance multiplied by momentum cannot result energy as in his dx*dp>=h/4pi equation. It's a blunder. In addition the momentum can be well determined when electrons hit an object or can be watched in cloud chambers. Electrons can behave like waves similar to water or air but to show one electron like fog is absurd. Bohr’s model cannot be saved
FARIAatheBangladeshi 4 months ago
Comment removed
MrThomas7191 4 months ago
@FARIAatheBangladeshi faria whr did u copy dis frm? google search?
tomas520ify 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tomas520ify I READ IT IN WIKIPEDIA WROTE IN BENGALI N GTRANSLATOR HAS TRANSLATED IT
FARIAatheBangladeshi 4 months ago
@FARIAatheBangladeshi Ok nice
tomas520ify 4 months ago
bohring
regretrage 4 months ago
its small
thegeekrajput 5 months ago
This isn' Bohring
GodOfUnbelief 6 months ago
good
Supreeto 9 months ago 5
She can't even say Rutherford properly.. Its Ru "TH" "F"ord you
muppet...
dazzassti 9 months ago
its stupid!!!
o0Arex0o 10 months ago
Niels Bohr, you FOOL!!
(lol. Probablility clouds for the win.)
geekofsteal 1 year ago
My obviously inarticulate teacher spent an entire day explaining this concept in like 80,000 words. She could have just shown this video...
angrywinds 1 year ago 20
no idea why i looked this up.. think cuz im failing science :P
megaferfer123 1 year ago
oh my god my teacher put this on her website O_o"
darkus1234561 1 year ago
great
MissAnimeFreak513 1 year ago
=_=
jameshermanto 1 year ago