i'm a master metallurgist and I saw fox, the only live feed on 911 of twr 2 live "hit". When I saw the nose out then fade to black, I was floored. Aluminum tube will not go through concrete and steel like those mega buildings and come out the other side....do you think they plowed the concrete w/steel reinforcement rods all the way across the block long building, 3 floors thick and then the monster gurders 36inch. hahahhahhah. it's not mysterious...IT'S IMPOSSIBLE PEOPLE IMPOSSIBLE!!!!!!!
@sssssjjjj1 When you were studying you must have been on drugs when they were trying to teach you about energy. Why do you lie to yourself? Your upper case shouting gives your game away.
Whoever started calling it a 'HOAX' needs to read a dictionary,to imply that it was a 'HOAX',would be to imply that what we all saw didn't actually happen,.
I for one could go on record as saying that the 'official story' leads to more than a few unanswered questions,but I would never call it a hoax,I could never say it didn't happen.
Suicide dives? LMAO! There is only ONE "dive bomber" shot out of all the videos filmed on 9/11. There would be no controlling a 767 in a dive, so hitting a precise target like WTC 2 would be impossible not to mention the aircraft would have broken up in the dive. And Skippy, I'm still waiting on ANY video showing UA 175 actually IMPACTING WTC 2.
this whole thing is very very misleading. The camera moves at the point of impact, so the point where the ejected material comes out looks out of line with respect to the watermark.
And of COURSE stuff came out the other side. You think that the plane just stopped dead in the middle of the tower?
@Malafede122112 Actually, yes the buildings were just very pourous. The floors were what 4 metres apart or something? There was a few inches of steel, some aluminium cladding, and more steel in the core. The rest was just glass and air.
@dangerouslytalented Thank you for your good work. You, and people like you, keep the hopelessly stupid people from accidently coming to my channel, which would be a waste of everyone's time.
@Malafede122112 What would you expect to happen if a 767 hit an office building? Stop dead? Bounce off? There is no other option other than for bits of it to smash clean through.
@dangerouslytalented well let me school you a little bit,,,,,,hollow lite soft aluminum,,,,,,,can never,,,,and will never be able to seemlessly glide through steel,,,,this so called plane went right through massive steel girders and horizontal floor assemblys with 1 foot thick concrete,,,,just like it was gliding through air,,,,,if this was a real crash,,,,there would be piecies of that plane exploding everywhere against the impact wall because of the energy trnsfer,,,,this is fake all the way!
@bigbopper993 A Boeing 767 might be hollow, but it was not light (an unloaded 767 of the kind that hit the WTC weighed in excesss of 90 tonnes, the whole fuselage was made from a supertough laminate called GLARE, the wingspars were exceptionally strong to withstand flight stresses, and all the leading edges were reinforced to withstand highspeed collisions with geese and that kind of thing. Look up crash test fighter plane concrete to see what damage can be done to concrete
Obviously you've never worked on aircraft. If you had, you'd know that the wings aren't as strong as you're claiming. Besides being hollow to hold fuel, the wings are made up of many moving parts to control the ailerons, flaps, trim tabs, etc. Hence the reason for the "NO STEP" stencils along the control surfaces. If a real 767 hit WTC 2, there would have been an impact and an explosion would have been immediate. No commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
@lmfecher Have you worked on an aircraft? We are not talking about the control surfaces, which are not engineered for any kind of impact. We are talking about the LEADING EDGES, which have to be rated for large birdstrikes.
I am a former US Navy aircraft mechanic and I worked on several types of aircraft for six years. Even the leading edges of the wings are susceptible to bird strikes and the wings are certainly NOT capable of slicing through steel framed buildings. You, along with many others, saw a bad made for tv movie on 9/11 and chose to believe what they showed you instead of thinking logically. Show me one, just one video of UA 175 actually IMPACTING WTC 2.
@lmfecher Even something as small and delicate as a fighter jet can do massive damage watch?v=AB4IEa7jTJw you will see the wing literally slicing through the block of concrete. Concrete dust and chunks of concrete go literally flying.
And here are much clearer shots of the second impact
watch?v=eCDjXqe1noM watch?v=lLGmfj6fvIA
The WTC was NOT a solid block of concrete. The WTC was made from tube steel and concrete floors. Much less durable.
That F-4 you're referring to EXPLODES upon impact with the concrete wall. And as far as the other two videos, again I ask you, where does UA 175 actually IMPACT WTC 2? Where is the explosion UPON impact? There is no impact because there were no airliners. I've spent 9 yrs investigating 9/11, logging over 5200 research hours and I can say with certainty that no commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
FYI-The first aircraft I ever turned up was a F-4 and that bird had lots of armor plating (a bitch for mechs) and was quite solid. So when you refer to a F-4 as a "small and delicate fighter jet" , it's hard to take you seriously. The WTC 1 & 2 were massive steel framed buildings built to withstand hurricane force winds and multiple airliner hits, much more "durable" than you claim. When aluminum meets steel, steel wins everytime. Show me where UA 175 IMPACTS WTC 2.
@lmfecher Oh, come on... There are DOZENS of shots of 175 hitting WTC2. What on EARTH do you think would have happened had a Boeing hit the WTC? I mean, look at the damage that the much heavier Empire State Building (with full masonry facade and floor columns throughout) suffered from a much slower much lighter, much smaller, empty World War II bomber that had very little fuel on board.
There are dozens of shots showing UA 175 flying THROUGH WTC 2, but there's no impact or deceleration. This defies Newtonian mechanics as well as basic crash physics. Had a real airliner hit tower 2, there would have been an explosion upon impact, crumbling of the nosecone, fuselage, wings and tail section. Instead, the videos show the airliner completely entering tower 2 unimpeded and then exploding inside. Show me a video where UA 175 actually HITS tower 2.
And several videos from 9/11 show UA 175 penetrate a steel framed tower, slice through steel core columns, EXPLODE, and then penetrate and exit out another steel framed wall with its NOSECONE INTACT! Totally impossible.
@lmfecher Stuff went all the way through... That was not a nosecone, you can see on the next few frames that was ejected material.Engines, wheels, and other debris has slammed all the way through. Yes, the planes were made of light material. But light material can cause enormous damage at high speeds.
what do you EXPECT would happen when a 767 hits a tower at 500+mph?
LMAO! Here's a news flash for you! A 767 CANNOT fly 500mph at 800ft because of air density and structural integrity. And yes, it was the nosecone that exited out the other side of WTC 2 because the tech that inserted the cgi airliners fucked up! I'm still waiting for you to produce ANY video of UA 175 actually IMPACTING WTC 2. No commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
@lmfecher Structural integrity means nothing to a suicidal pilot. A plane would not simply fall apart at those speeds, but, yes, cracks and metal fatigue would probably occur at such speeds. And as for the air being too thick for engines to function at full power at ground level, that is COMPLETE bullshit, the only time when jet engines are normally turned up to full power at ALL is during takeoff.
Suicidal pilots? LOL!!! The engines on a 767 are not designed for high speeds at low altitude, there are no intacts for RAM air. If a pilot attempted full military power at 800ft, the engines would stall due to an improper mix of fuel and air in the combustion chamber. And the resonance on the airframe and wing section at those speeds would cause the airframe to stress above its limits and break apart. You've never worked on aircraft, have you Skippy? Impact video?
@lmfecher The planes were in suicide dives. Put the engines to full takeoff capacity, and point the plane downwards.Even when the engine stalls, the momentum is still vast. And the plane would not be shaken to bits like some cessna...
The only statement I care to make about The Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.
@vernb57 i think he is telling us that the first thing that hit the building is the nose of the plane. now, when the nose of the plane went out the other side of the building it looks like it was intact, no damage at all.... therefore, you are the one who wasted my time from reading your stupid post. MORON!!!
Ya know I’m going to start my own Demo Company called "USA Suckers Demolition" I'm going to charge 5000$ to drop huge Steel buildings. It’s easy, get some cheap JetAfuel - cut a few random core columns and pore it over 3 floors and throw a match at it. Then I’m going down the Pub for a meal and 5 pints! when I come back I knw the Huge Steel framed building will have fallen down into its own footprint with the steel magically cut ready for transport! I’m GOING TO MAKE a Shitload of Cash! LOL
The only statement I care to make about The Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.
The only statement I care to make about The Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.
And 1,000,000 say it wasn't. So either numbers really don't matter or some how the government managed to pay off a million people in the fields of demolition and physics. Then again, apparently that many were paid to keep the moon hoax a secret...
@vercetti0014 It's called "Also Sprach Zarathustra" by Richard Strauss....it was the opening theme for "2001 A Space Odyssey"............it is also Nature Boy Ric Flair's theme song....lol.
@HaloHamstur no the people would not have supported that, especially since that war is FAKE! see DOLLARPAGES is a dot org They neede a catalyzing event scour the site i gave you and you will see
i seen video after video comment after comment and i have never seen the words Muslims had nothing to do with this it was inside job YOU MAKE ME SICK May Allah(SWT) Burn America to the Ground and all the PPl that know its a lie but continue to flap there Gums and do nothing so On behalf of Islam and ALL Muslims Getting Massacred a Big .................. FUCK YOU
Since the nose obviously came out of the other side of the tower, I wonder where it landed, and if the eye witnesses that say to have seen the plane also seen the nose of the plane going towards the ground?
Is this the 'smoking gun'? because I am sure the 9/11 commision would of changed their mind just on this, incredible footage, and a nice logo telling us that for NY it was a 'Good day'.
Not.
This video shows us why people go to school to learn things.
This is such a hoax. The towers are still there. You see, they covered them with a sheet of metamaterials rendering them invisible to the naked eye, and then they edited video so that it looked like planes were crashing into them.
The explaination of a "pancake collapse" is not viable because, even if the floors were in free fall and even if the core got hot enough to liquify, the core steel below the fire would have remained and would have, at minimum resulted in torsion and falling of the towers rather than the "pancake collapse" that we saw. Please don't comment, if you do not truly understand the construction of these towers. It is what it is. Im sorry.
@muddymouse1968 also, why has this sort of attack never before or after ever happened. we give "the terrorists" a ton of credit to be ble to pull off 3 attacks with jet airliners, the pentagon "hit" means that that Arab pilot w/ limited training was able to basically do the impossible. if we look at the Pentagon from google maps, imagine then trying to even come close to flying a jumbo jet into such a low lying structure. there would have been mass carnage in a very large area.
It is true that the temperatures reached within the towers could cause structural failure through the warping and illongation of the steel. But, the idea that all of the structure within the tower reached critical temperatures and failed simultaneously, is impossible to defend. Facing that fact, as well as the implicationsof that fact, requires the understanding that these 3 bldgs falling in their own footprints is impossible without the intervention of some other mechanism or process.
population reduction :/ reading up about the governments population reduction program shit what made me believe this was a hoax >..> my opinion now the government is inhuman and all deserve the fate of the people in those twin towers >.>
The TRUTH is out there if you really seek it.. There are many investigations regarding 9-11, here are two that I hold as fact. #1 (Rockefeller Reveals 9/11 FRAUD to Aaron Russo) #2. (part 1 JOHN LEAR 9/11) . Please don't send me any messages.. I know the truth.
You guys are morons. It's not the impact that caused the towers to collapse, it was the fire that insued afterwards. You can spew all that bullshit that "Jet fuel can't melt steel"; you're right, but think back to basic science (If you even know that much). You heat up metal to a certain point, and you can seriously degrade the integrity. There was no explosion or controlled demolition; the main structure inside heated up to the point that it could no longer hold itself up.
@Wuhan5 it is good to know that not everyone on this page is a mindless sheep who will meerly follow anything they don't understand and just trust the morons who think that they do, hopefully people read your comments and realize that science is is better proff than some *self proclamed* digital evidence ...
@TheKeyman1984 I am not taking sides, I am really not sure about this whole thing, it confuses me =). Although I am sorry that you had family there, it really does not prove anything..
compelling evidence, the music was what convinced me.
Of course shit is going to come out the other side of the building, its not gonna be hard for a 50 ton aircraft going 575 mp/h to slam through a few tens of yards of steel, concrete, glass, cubicle, and drywall
O yea it was definitely a hoax.........bullshit!
(please please comment lets talk about this I want to hear what evidence you have against the united states government)
Watch Zeitgeist, the Obama Deception, Endgame, Loose Change. There are so many documentaries and books that indicate that the United States government plotted 9/11.
@2ctrain College kids? lol Where did you get that information? Zeitgeist is the conclusive study of a 76 year old futurist and the others are made by Alex Jones and his movement. lol All of these people are well beyond college and into their 30's at least. Also there are a lot of interviews with government officials that have been in the CIA and other groups for over 30 years.
Most definitely. I can understand how difficult of a topic this is to discuss because there are so many justifications for both left and right wing sides Definitely worth getting into though. The evidence suggesting an inside job is pretty damn compelling. It took me a long time before I believed it myself. I like talking about this stuff myself especially to people who disagree because I like getting both sides.
some of the things (sorry if I offend you) you people come up with as fact supporting the conspiracy theory is quite compelling I'll give you that, some of it I can even believe. Although, the videos people make that deliberately make it seem like a conspiracy yet have no basis for credibility make me question things. (watch "9/11 TV fakery smoke and mirrors" then look up "September 11th as it happened CBS part 2", skip to about 2:45 do you see any duplicated smoke??"
@2ctrain What point are they trying to make with duplicate smoke? Seems incredibly unlegitimate. I haven't even heard anything about that. I always based my reasoning on the way the infrustructure was deliberately rigged for explosives and the evidence of thermite remains. Well just part of my reasoning. I dont know what the hell the mirrors and smoke are about.
It seems they are pulling for the "Missile w/ fake plane edited in theory" I only have two questions why make a completely faked video, and two, why isn't the evidence presented by "Loose Change" "Zeitgeist" enough, why do we need to push it so much to the point of making a phoney video?
@2ctrain It's people like this who make people who actually research 9/11 look like imbicils. Being someone who thinks 9/11 is completely an inside job, I still think this is phoney and distasteful. It's like people make up fake shit to sway others into thinking their own way, just for the sake of doing so. So did you watch those documentaries? What did you think?
I gave you a thumbs up but they're are two many idiots who are convinced by dramatic music and video footage so you still have negative thumbs down :)
why dont you do a google search for the architects who have come together, architects who build these skyscrapers, who will present real evidence that it was controlled demolition. then come back here and tell us all how to feel about the government. asshole.
how the fuck is it hoax,why would they bomb there own building,to get fear.
Fuck for retarted,
I bet your giong to say well there where exsplotians at the base or the colums in the midle go down.I have a kid like you in class,im 14 and i know it not A FUCKING HOAX
Well there were inner explosions which caused the infrastructure to fall at freefall rate. Also the 47 support columns were cut diagnally in a demolishion style fashion. Remnants of thermite were found indicating internal explosives. Besides that, NORAD failed to intercept the planes over 7 times in one day, and before 9/11 they had ovr 150 intercepts with 100% accuracy. Simultanious to the attack Dick Chaney issued a practice interception mission causing radar confusion. Conspiracy? Yes.
@Catstalker666 whoa relax pseudo scientist. You can use physics, are you walking down to the site and taking debris samples? lol Ok...I can use logic and reason.
No i live in new york witnessed the attack and i think about it. First the hologhram theory is fake because i knew people on two different planes. Also the bomb theory is fake because first the beams melted then were pushed to their elastic limit and broke the pressure inside then blewout the windows making it look like a bomb. And thanks for that smart ass comment i went down their to help and pay respect all you do is laugh about the deaths of 3,000 people.
Why would u not belive the goverment would not have done this?? It all comes down to controll the people... U have a lot odf learning to do... LOok at they do our food are water and everything else
@123JUJUBE you can't even speak english correctly and you expect people to consider you credible?
another thing
Controlling the people, what people?!, there is no one in the world more controlled than United States Citizens granted some are Idiots but there wasn't any need to "control" the people
it is proved by the laws of phyics that these place most definatley could not have caused these huges towers to collapse. it is impossible. the structure was actually built 20x stronger than it needed to be. it was an inside job by the american goverment
actuall you are wrong do th reaourself. All of the buildings main supporters were on the outside of the building. When the plane hit it melted the supports on the beams then the beams were at the breaking point of their elastic limits which caused it to collapse in on itself. Then when you see windows blowing out it is not explosives it is compression. When the buildings windows blew out it was caused by the compresion from the floors above. So the pressure blew out the windows.
The only statement I care to make about The Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.
@contactnoel2@MrBobnotfred at least recognizes truth, unlike yourself. go get a glass of koolaid, white bread with margarine, and the remote. THEN after 20 hours, brush with plenty of fluoride, then have a coke, and when you are 30 then take plenty of cholesterol pills ;-)
@MrBobnotfred you obviously didnt do ANY research to prove your point, in 2005 MIT did a study and took the same exact type of steel with fireproofing and all, and put it over a fire (fueled by jet fuel) and they said that it "weakened the steel dramtically...the debris from the jet and offices would 'sandblast' so to speak the fire coating off of the strengthened steel, that with the weight of the floors above it could easily cause catastrophic failure staring with the damaged supports"
@geterhero damn straight! these conspiracy theorists love using terms like 'laws of physics' and 'proven' without any back up. The collapses clearly start from the impact sites on both buildings, and steel doesn't need to be melted for it to be weak enough to break. Its not hard to find true facts but some folks just potter around youtube watching this tripe...
@y9dnkbe Explain to me how all 3 towers fell at near free fall speed, with no deceleration...and everything being pulverized to dust? Do you subscribe to the pile driver/pancake theory? Even IF there was sufficient weight (from the stories above) to pile drive some of the stories below, that wouldn't explain why that effect would continue all the way down...taking the path of GREATEST resistance!
In each collapse, you can see that there is nothing left to qualify as a pile driver!
@Bongofury361 The twin towers didnt fall too close to free-fall, plenty of conspiracy theorists will agree to that these days. WTC7 is different, but im no expert - im sure you are though ;)
@y9dnkbe Your here ? These conspiracy theorists this, these conspiracy theorists that..What is your explanation for three impossible events ALL ON THE SAME DAY. To me a dead give away IS THE TONS OF DUST. Dust is created when things are pulverized, or demolished, not in some ridiculous gravitational nonsense. Steel buildings don't just give up the ghost and fall into millions of pieces unless they are blown up. Damn there is evidence of the explosives in the tons of dust.
@MrRiceowlex Oh look, another expert! Oh, the dust is your proof and if I can't explain it then there's even more proof! It was a day of firsts, not impossibilities. You honestly believe every inch of the towers were rigged with explosives? I don't, I think there's far, far easier ways to have done it. If I were to do it I'd rig it to come down and claim it was another car bomb. Far easier to tie to Osama and far easier to quell the conspiracy theorists that pop up when anything happens.
What is retarded? Thinking it would take MORE than crashing two jets into the WTC to get America into WWIII. You don't know anything about how American's think, and you don't know anything about how Criminals think. You have the minds of children.
It wasnt 'staged', it actually happened, but they knew it was going to happen and infact let it happen! 9/11 was an inside job! They are now admitting that they wanted a war in middle east before hand, and this was a perfect excuse! Anyone who thinks otherwise needs to come forward with actual facts and not media 'facts'. So we are pure scum for seeking the truth? Define TRUTH. TRUTH is what actually happened and not what you are lead to believe happened!
There are alot of different things that happend that the government lied about. For instance the 757 they said crashed over Penn infact did not crash.
The 757 they said crashed into the Pentagon, was not the plane claimed, it was much much smaller.
The twin tower is the most confusing one. The speed that the planes were flying at, a normal AA plane could not do those speeds, it's so fast the plane would rip apart. Controlled demolition in the building. Look it up.
extra ordinary theories require extra ordinary facts. Theories can be proven or disproven using scientific knoweldge. Anyone who thinks any of this is staged is scum pure and simple.
The metal bars used in construction were coated with flammable substances; this was the 'first' time in history the flight recording boxes were never found; those boxes could hold crucial evidence to the people flying the plane and their intent; many former 9/11 workers claim to have seen and a few have even heard the recordings; the few that have heard it are being constantly followed, harrassed, bugged, and threatened to ensure they don't tell anyone; do you want to hear more?
sic-em! Said for a long time that if a 757 did actually hit the Pentagon - they would still be airing footage on TV to drum up support for the "war on terror." Wake up people - we are the "terrorists!"
My problem with the people who believe 9/11 was set up by our government is simple.If the planes weren't hijacked by terrorists,then who were they hijacked by?Do you have proof of whom,or just theories?What happened to the people on board who called their loved ones about the situation?Were the calls faked and they're fine?Why would Osama deliberately claim responsibility of the attacks if he didn't plan the deed?These are questions you must consider when believing the conspiracy you hold to.
do you have proof that it was done by 19 ragtag hijackers from afgan? oh a passport that flew thru the fireball onto the street? by the way id like to see evidence of osama saying it was him, i have seen 2 of him saying it wasnt him.
the fact is i do have evidence.But why show it to you?Like you're really going to be satisfied with the facts.That's why you're a conspiracy theorist!You love to hypothesize and contemplate the real "hidden" truth,when the truth is staring you in the face.
You simply don't have evidence. You seen the news just like all the other people that are believing without testing.
Kind of like how thermite was found all over the place at ground zero, in every amount of debris. If you don't know what thermite is, look it up. That's already enough evidence to prove something else happend than a plane crashing and the WTC falling within an hour of burning. Record time, RECORD First time ANY steel building fell. FOR 3 STEEL BUILDING IN ONE DAY
Have you even looked up what thermite is? Thermite doesn't explode. It doesn't even burn vertically. And first time three steel buildings fell in one day? You do realize that planes filled with jet fuel flew straight into the buildings right? The steel was weakened by the extreme heat, the center of gravity shifted and the building could no longer hold the weight it once did. Where the hell is your evidence?
I know thermite doesn't explode, have you looked it up? when thermite is lit on fire it produces real extreme heat. Do you realize that all the jet fuel blew up on impact at the beginning of the crash, that's what the huge fireball going into the air was, all jet fuel.
Do you realize that building 7 didn't get hit by an airplane?
there was jumpers right? how is it that they were jumping out of the impact hole, where this steel melting fire is located?
so you're assuming ALL the jet fuel went in one direction? You talk about evidence, where is your evidence that there was thermite found at building 7. The report says it was hit by debris off the world trade towers. What is your evidence that the report is wrong? Where is there any evidence that jumpers jumped out of the impact hole? The buildings were not designed to have a commercial airliner blow into the side of it. 9/11 was an unprecedented event.
No, it's not an assumption, jet fuel is more flammable than gasoline an it would completely burn up within the first 10 minutes. it's like your trying to defend whats looking at you in the face.
/watch?v=KcC6bTHosx0
this one below, is pure evidence, go to 1:45 in and hear what leaseholder of WTC 7 has to say.
/watch?v=iEuJimaumW4
and YES, these building were built to withstand a plane impact
i'm not sitting making up bullshit man, an if the facts didn't prove this, there would be no argue
So what if would burn up in ten minutes? The explosion would of done a massive amount of damage to the buildings. Yes there were DESIGNED to take an impact, but no one designed these buildings with commercial jet liners in mind. You're using the same old out of context "pull it" clip? Please, that's a HUGE assumption. That he was talking with demolition lingo (which isn't even used when talking about explosives). Just because someone makes an argument doesn't make it valid.
It's not out of context, the man said "they made the decision to pull, and we watched the building collapse" It is a huge assumption. More of the reason why people don't trust the government. Why did they pull the bomb sniffing dogs 20 days before 911, why did the owner take out like a 15mil insurance claim before the attacks. Why are they not releasing more videos of the Pentagon plane when they caught it on at LEAST 5 different angles at the most secure place in the world.
That what's out of context. Your claiming he meant that they "pulled" to blow up the building when its clear from the entire interview they pulled the men out b/c they thought it was going to collapse. The risk to cover up 9/11 alone makes a conspiracy irrational. If the republican part was caught, they would lose power for the next century. The false premise you start off with is that you expect the govt. to be super efficient when they're obviously not. They couldn't even cover up a blow job.
The entire interview also said there was no firemen in the building, because none was needed, they evacuated all the people out of building 7 before 1 and 2 collapsed.
If you also watched the rest of the video, you heard what the professionals said about the building collapsing too. Professionals, they're not some theorist. Almost anyone knows just from seeing other demolitions that the buildings collapse inward. Why did it not fall leaning towards where all damage was done on one side.
It did. The hole in the penthouse on the east side and the debris damage on the west side made it the weakest part of the building and therefore the north and south side fell inwards. It fell exactly like it was supposed to. If this was such a huge conspiracy, how many people do you think would be needed to carry it out? Do you really believe that so many people could keep such a devastating secret?
What in the mother of buttcunt did I just watch?
DrJackJeckyl 2 weeks ago
media was 100% involved. Aluminum still won't slice through concrete and steel.
sssssjjjj1 5 months ago
i'm a master metallurgist and I saw fox, the only live feed on 911 of twr 2 live "hit". When I saw the nose out then fade to black, I was floored. Aluminum tube will not go through concrete and steel like those mega buildings and come out the other side....do you think they plowed the concrete w/steel reinforcement rods all the way across the block long building, 3 floors thick and then the monster gurders 36inch. hahahhahhah. it's not mysterious...IT'S IMPOSSIBLE PEOPLE IMPOSSIBLE!!!!!!!
sssssjjjj1 5 months ago
@sssssjjjj1 When you were studying you must have been on drugs when they were trying to teach you about energy. Why do you lie to yourself? Your upper case shouting gives your game away.
SteveArpo 3 months ago
The song made it feel more epic rather than disastrous...
AFlyingPenis 5 months ago
Whoever started calling it a 'HOAX' needs to read a dictionary,to imply that it was a 'HOAX',would be to imply that what we all saw didn't actually happen,.
I for one could go on record as saying that the 'official story' leads to more than a few unanswered questions,but I would never call it a hoax,I could never say it didn't happen.
bai692001 8 months ago
@bai692001 Oh Yes! ...IT happend! ....but not like it was told us..... thats a fact.
keyhole911 8 months ago
WATCH
THE
ARRIVALS
pinball281 9 months ago
Demand the furtherance of American eugenics through comprehensive legislation! Let our mantra be: ABORTION IS OUR BIRTHRIGHT!
SufferInJuly 11 months ago
A Homer Simpson "DOHH" moment!!
bulltexan1 1 year ago
Suicide dives? LMAO! There is only ONE "dive bomber" shot out of all the videos filmed on 9/11. There would be no controlling a 767 in a dive, so hitting a precise target like WTC 2 would be impossible not to mention the aircraft would have broken up in the dive. And Skippy, I'm still waiting on ANY video showing UA 175 actually IMPACTING WTC 2.
lmfecher 1 year ago
this whole thing is very very misleading. The camera moves at the point of impact, so the point where the ejected material comes out looks out of line with respect to the watermark.
And of COURSE stuff came out the other side. You think that the plane just stopped dead in the middle of the tower?
dangerouslytalented 1 year ago
Boy, they make those plane noses solid! Or are the buildings just very porous?
Malafede122112 1 year ago
@Malafede122112 Actually, yes the buildings were just very pourous. The floors were what 4 metres apart or something? There was a few inches of steel, some aluminium cladding, and more steel in the core. The rest was just glass and air.
dangerouslytalented 1 year ago
@dangerouslytalented Thank you for your good work. You, and people like you, keep the hopelessly stupid people from accidently coming to my channel, which would be a waste of everyone's time.
Sort of a culling process.
Malafede122112 1 year ago
@Malafede122112 What would you expect to happen if a 767 hit an office building? Stop dead? Bounce off? There is no other option other than for bits of it to smash clean through.
dangerouslytalented 1 year ago
@dangerouslytalented Once again, thank you for your work. You are doing great.
Malafede122112 1 year ago
@dangerouslytalented well let me school you a little bit,,,,,,hollow lite soft aluminum,,,,,,,can never,,,,and will never be able to seemlessly glide through steel,,,,this so called plane went right through massive steel girders and horizontal floor assemblys with 1 foot thick concrete,,,,just like it was gliding through air,,,,,if this was a real crash,,,,there would be piecies of that plane exploding everywhere against the impact wall because of the energy trnsfer,,,,this is fake all the way!
bigbopper993 1 year ago
@bigbopper993 A Boeing 767 might be hollow, but it was not light (an unloaded 767 of the kind that hit the WTC weighed in excesss of 90 tonnes, the whole fuselage was made from a supertough laminate called GLARE, the wingspars were exceptionally strong to withstand flight stresses, and all the leading edges were reinforced to withstand highspeed collisions with geese and that kind of thing. Look up crash test fighter plane concrete to see what damage can be done to concrete
dangerouslytalented 1 year ago
@dangerouslytalented
Obviously you've never worked on aircraft. If you had, you'd know that the wings aren't as strong as you're claiming. Besides being hollow to hold fuel, the wings are made up of many moving parts to control the ailerons, flaps, trim tabs, etc. Hence the reason for the "NO STEP" stencils along the control surfaces. If a real 767 hit WTC 2, there would have been an impact and an explosion would have been immediate. No commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher Have you worked on an aircraft? We are not talking about the control surfaces, which are not engineered for any kind of impact. We are talking about the LEADING EDGES, which have to be rated for large birdstrikes.
dangerouslytalented 1 year ago
@dangerouslytalented
I am a former US Navy aircraft mechanic and I worked on several types of aircraft for six years. Even the leading edges of the wings are susceptible to bird strikes and the wings are certainly NOT capable of slicing through steel framed buildings. You, along with many others, saw a bad made for tv movie on 9/11 and chose to believe what they showed you instead of thinking logically. Show me one, just one video of UA 175 actually IMPACTING WTC 2.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher Even something as small and delicate as a fighter jet can do massive damage watch?v=AB4IEa7jTJw you will see the wing literally slicing through the block of concrete. Concrete dust and chunks of concrete go literally flying.
And here are much clearer shots of the second impact
watch?v=eCDjXqe1noM watch?v=lLGmfj6fvIA
The WTC was NOT a solid block of concrete. The WTC was made from tube steel and concrete floors. Much less durable.
dangerouslytalented 1 year ago
@dangerouslytalented
That F-4 you're referring to EXPLODES upon impact with the concrete wall. And as far as the other two videos, again I ask you, where does UA 175 actually IMPACT WTC 2? Where is the explosion UPON impact? There is no impact because there were no airliners. I've spent 9 yrs investigating 9/11, logging over 5200 research hours and I can say with certainty that no commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@dangerouslytalented
FYI-The first aircraft I ever turned up was a F-4 and that bird had lots of armor plating (a bitch for mechs) and was quite solid. So when you refer to a F-4 as a "small and delicate fighter jet" , it's hard to take you seriously. The WTC 1 & 2 were massive steel framed buildings built to withstand hurricane force winds and multiple airliner hits, much more "durable" than you claim. When aluminum meets steel, steel wins everytime. Show me where UA 175 IMPACTS WTC 2.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher Oh, come on... There are DOZENS of shots of 175 hitting WTC2. What on EARTH do you think would have happened had a Boeing hit the WTC? I mean, look at the damage that the much heavier Empire State Building (with full masonry facade and floor columns throughout) suffered from a much slower much lighter, much smaller, empty World War II bomber that had very little fuel on board.
dangerouslytalented 1 year ago
@dangerouslytalented
There are dozens of shots showing UA 175 flying THROUGH WTC 2, but there's no impact or deceleration. This defies Newtonian mechanics as well as basic crash physics. Had a real airliner hit tower 2, there would have been an explosion upon impact, crumbling of the nosecone, fuselage, wings and tail section. Instead, the videos show the airliner completely entering tower 2 unimpeded and then exploding inside. Show me a video where UA 175 actually HITS tower 2.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@dangerouslytalented
And several videos from 9/11 show UA 175 penetrate a steel framed tower, slice through steel core columns, EXPLODE, and then penetrate and exit out another steel framed wall with its NOSECONE INTACT! Totally impossible.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher Stuff went all the way through... That was not a nosecone, you can see on the next few frames that was ejected material.Engines, wheels, and other debris has slammed all the way through. Yes, the planes were made of light material. But light material can cause enormous damage at high speeds.
what do you EXPECT would happen when a 767 hits a tower at 500+mph?
dangerouslytalented 1 year ago
@dangerouslytalented
LMAO! Here's a news flash for you! A 767 CANNOT fly 500mph at 800ft because of air density and structural integrity. And yes, it was the nosecone that exited out the other side of WTC 2 because the tech that inserted the cgi airliners fucked up! I'm still waiting for you to produce ANY video of UA 175 actually IMPACTING WTC 2. No commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher Structural integrity means nothing to a suicidal pilot. A plane would not simply fall apart at those speeds, but, yes, cracks and metal fatigue would probably occur at such speeds. And as for the air being too thick for engines to function at full power at ground level, that is COMPLETE bullshit, the only time when jet engines are normally turned up to full power at ALL is during takeoff.
dangerouslytalented 1 year ago
@dangerouslytalented
Suicidal pilots? LOL!!! The engines on a 767 are not designed for high speeds at low altitude, there are no intacts for RAM air. If a pilot attempted full military power at 800ft, the engines would stall due to an improper mix of fuel and air in the combustion chamber. And the resonance on the airframe and wing section at those speeds would cause the airframe to stress above its limits and break apart. You've never worked on aircraft, have you Skippy? Impact video?
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher
Correction, there are no INTAKES for RAM air.
lmfecher 1 year ago
@lmfecher The planes were in suicide dives. Put the engines to full takeoff capacity, and point the plane downwards.Even when the engine stalls, the momentum is still vast. And the plane would not be shaken to bits like some cessna...
dangerouslytalented 1 year ago
Henry Ford had this to say
The only statement I care to make about The Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.
read at DOLLARPAGES [X] ORG
OTHER LINKS
BANKOFBC [X] COM & BANKOFBC [X] CA
KILLERSPRAY [X] COM & KILLERSPRAY [X] CA
t i n y u r l [x] com / kjvkjvkjv
vhsjvc 1 year ago
Wow...That was ALMOST a waste of my 1 min. & 45 sec....Why not elaborate on the .....nose in/nose out ?~?~?...What does that proove ?
vernb57 1 year ago
@vernb57 i think he is telling us that the first thing that hit the building is the nose of the plane. now, when the nose of the plane went out the other side of the building it looks like it was intact, no damage at all.... therefore, you are the one who wasted my time from reading your stupid post. MORON!!!
Albertp64 1 year ago
Ya know I’m going to start my own Demo Company called "USA Suckers Demolition" I'm going to charge 5000$ to drop huge Steel buildings. It’s easy, get some cheap JetAfuel - cut a few random core columns and pore it over 3 floors and throw a match at it. Then I’m going down the Pub for a meal and 5 pints! when I come back I knw the Huge Steel framed building will have fallen down into its own footprint with the steel magically cut ready for transport! I’m GOING TO MAKE a Shitload of Cash! LOL
blackArt2000 1 year ago
@blackArt2000 Henry Ford had this to say
The only statement I care to make about The Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.
READ AT dollarpages [x] org
see also
BANKOFBC [X] COM & BANKOFBC [X] CA
KILLERSPRAY [X] COM & KILLERSPRAY [X] CA
t i n y u r l [x] com / kjvkjvkjv
vhsjvc 1 year ago
1000 demolition experts said 9/11 was a demolition job.
justicepartyuk 1 year ago 12
@justicepartyuk Henry Ford had this to say
The only statement I care to make about The Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.
READ AT dollarpages [x] org
see also
BANKOFBC [X] COM & BANKOFBC [X] CA
KILLERSPRAY [X] COM & KILLERSPRAY [X] CA
t i n y u r l [x] com / kjvkjvkjv
vhsjvc 1 year ago
@justicepartyuk I would agree, it was a reason to go back to the middle east and finish "the new world order"
hellzone100 1 year ago
@justicepartyuk ROFL! Did you study L. Ron Hubbard? "If your going to lie, make it a big one, more people will believe it"
BadBunnyRides 10 months ago
@justicepartyuk
And 1,000,000 say it wasn't. So either numbers really don't matter or some how the government managed to pay off a million people in the fields of demolition and physics. Then again, apparently that many were paid to keep the moon hoax a secret...
stbays 8 months ago
@apatriotofusa ok, thanks. this video could have used some captions or commentary.
GamingsecretsTV 1 year ago
What the fuck is your goddamn point?!?!
GamingsecretsTV 1 year ago
what is the name of this song
vercetti0014 1 year ago
@vercetti0014 It's called "Also Sprach Zarathustra" by Richard Strauss....it was the opening theme for "2001 A Space Odyssey"............it is also Nature Boy Ric Flair's theme song....lol.
unafraidtruther 1 year ago
Incredible! I want to share DOLLARPAGES is a dot org ADD IT TO YOUR FAVES!
vhsjvc 1 year ago
government didnt do this we could of gone to war without kill thousands of people
HaloHamstur 1 year ago
@HaloHamstur no the people would not have supported that, especially since that war is FAKE! see DOLLARPAGES is a dot org They neede a catalyzing event scour the site i gave you and you will see
vhsjvc 1 year ago
why did bush do this to his people money
bcnewsvideo 1 year ago
I watched may videos.. NEVER saw that one. Conspiracy? Perhaps. Lots of strange things to consider. But.. NOT that one!
MoonlighZ09 1 year ago
i seen video after video comment after comment and i have never seen the words Muslims had nothing to do with this it was inside job YOU MAKE ME SICK May Allah(SWT) Burn America to the Ground and all the PPl that know its a lie but continue to flap there Gums and do nothing so On behalf of Islam and ALL Muslims Getting Massacred a Big .................. FUCK YOU
Allahsarmy 1 year ago
Since the nose obviously came out of the other side of the tower, I wonder where it landed, and if the eye witnesses that say to have seen the plane also seen the nose of the plane going towards the ground?
BradMLayZ 1 year ago
The plane went in then came out much higher. The plane was definitely fake.
JeremyFuhenstasser 1 year ago
Smartass...
mmar149 1 year ago
Is this the 'smoking gun'? because I am sure the 9/11 commision would of changed their mind just on this, incredible footage, and a nice logo telling us that for NY it was a 'Good day'.
Not.
This video shows us why people go to school to learn things.
dortyhoor 1 year ago
what exactly is your point???? we all know planes hit the towers, but what made them fall???
floyd1252 1 year ago
I agree, the business at the Pentagon is another story entirely.
muddymouse1968 1 year ago
This is such a hoax. The towers are still there. You see, they covered them with a sheet of metamaterials rendering them invisible to the naked eye, and then they edited video so that it looked like planes were crashing into them.
TheJakeGreene 1 year ago
The explaination of a "pancake collapse" is not viable because, even if the floors were in free fall and even if the core got hot enough to liquify, the core steel below the fire would have remained and would have, at minimum resulted in torsion and falling of the towers rather than the "pancake collapse" that we saw. Please don't comment, if you do not truly understand the construction of these towers. It is what it is. Im sorry.
muddymouse1968 1 year ago
@muddymouse1968 also, why has this sort of attack never before or after ever happened. we give "the terrorists" a ton of credit to be ble to pull off 3 attacks with jet airliners, the pentagon "hit" means that that Arab pilot w/ limited training was able to basically do the impossible. if we look at the Pentagon from google maps, imagine then trying to even come close to flying a jumbo jet into such a low lying structure. there would have been mass carnage in a very large area.
generationaluv 1 year ago
It is true that the temperatures reached within the towers could cause structural failure through the warping and illongation of the steel. But, the idea that all of the structure within the tower reached critical temperatures and failed simultaneously, is impossible to defend. Facing that fact, as well as the implicationsof that fact, requires the understanding that these 3 bldgs falling in their own footprints is impossible without the intervention of some other mechanism or process.
muddymouse1968 1 year ago
population reduction :/ reading up about the governments population reduction program shit what made me believe this was a hoax >..> my opinion now the government is inhuman and all deserve the fate of the people in those twin towers >.>
CiethLightning 1 year ago
What's the significance of nose in, nose out?
TwitterBug26 1 year ago
@TwitterBug26 ya i know
twigdude931 1 year ago
The TRUTH is out there if you really seek it.. There are many investigations regarding 9-11, here are two that I hold as fact. #1 (Rockefeller Reveals 9/11 FRAUD to Aaron Russo) #2. (part 1 JOHN LEAR 9/11) . Please don't send me any messages.. I know the truth.
greg357159 1 year ago
@greg357159 if u claim to know because u know then ur just a crazy or a fanatic looking for fun in life.
Catstalker666 1 year ago
See "Demolition Expert Debunks the Debunkers". This was a False flag operation. Even other countries know it.
73849309378 1 year ago
You guys are morons. It's not the impact that caused the towers to collapse, it was the fire that insued afterwards. You can spew all that bullshit that "Jet fuel can't melt steel"; you're right, but think back to basic science (If you even know that much). You heat up metal to a certain point, and you can seriously degrade the integrity. There was no explosion or controlled demolition; the main structure inside heated up to the point that it could no longer hold itself up.
Wuhan5 1 year ago
@Wuhan5 it is good to know that not everyone on this page is a mindless sheep who will meerly follow anything they don't understand and just trust the morons who think that they do, hopefully people read your comments and realize that science is is better proff than some *self proclamed* digital evidence ...
TropnevadNitsuj 1 year ago
@Wuhan5 hahaha
haneysbighouse 1 year ago
@Wuhan5 thank you.
Catstalker666 1 year ago
Bush and Chaney need to explain their lies even if it takes the " people" to pull them into the streets and beat it out of them,
greg357159 1 year ago
@greg357159 i agree that bush and chaney need to be pulled into the streats and beat but if you think 9/11 was a hoiax then you are high
TropnevadNitsuj 1 year ago
some of you americans are real fuckin nubjobs
nev62 1 year ago
I know for a fact that it was a plane that crashed because i had family in the first tower!
TheKeyman1984 1 year ago
@TheKeyman1984 I am not taking sides, I am really not sure about this whole thing, it confuses me =). Although I am sorry that you had family there, it really does not prove anything..
frogs482 1 year ago
@TheKeyman1984 same i had friends on the plane
Catstalker666 1 year ago
What the hell does this prove this doesn't bring back the thousands of men and women who were killed or wait was tht a big hoax too
ogon17 1 year ago
One day our american friends will realize that the German were right!
Odessa1983 1 year ago
what a rubbish video! proves nothing at all! time wasting
bennyallen0 1 year ago
i have to be honest, the music for this video is a little innapprotpriate
danserchique 1 year ago
too bad those poor people on the ground didn't notice it was just digital shit raining down on em.
kdawg925 1 year ago
compelling evidence, the music was what convinced me.
Of course shit is going to come out the other side of the building, its not gonna be hard for a 50 ton aircraft going 575 mp/h to slam through a few tens of yards of steel, concrete, glass, cubicle, and drywall
O yea it was definitely a hoax.........bullshit!
(please please comment lets talk about this I want to hear what evidence you have against the united states government)
2ctrain 2 years ago
Watch Zeitgeist, the Obama Deception, Endgame, Loose Change. There are so many documentaries and books that indicate that the United States government plotted 9/11.
sorryifioffendedu 2 years ago
@sorryifioffendedu
Documentaries made by 22 year old college kids are not what I call Credible Sources of Information
2ctrain 2 years ago
@2ctrain College kids? lol Where did you get that information? Zeitgeist is the conclusive study of a 76 year old futurist and the others are made by Alex Jones and his movement. lol All of these people are well beyond college and into their 30's at least. Also there are a lot of interviews with government officials that have been in the CIA and other groups for over 30 years.
sorryifioffendedu 2 years ago
@sorryifioffendedu
well, I stand corrected, now, I'm just disagreeing with you on principle :)
2ctrain 2 years ago
Most definitely. I can understand how difficult of a topic this is to discuss because there are so many justifications for both left and right wing sides Definitely worth getting into though. The evidence suggesting an inside job is pretty damn compelling. It took me a long time before I believed it myself. I like talking about this stuff myself especially to people who disagree because I like getting both sides.
sorryifioffendedu 2 years ago
@sorryifioffendedu
some of the things (sorry if I offend you) you people come up with as fact supporting the conspiracy theory is quite compelling I'll give you that, some of it I can even believe. Although, the videos people make that deliberately make it seem like a conspiracy yet have no basis for credibility make me question things. (watch "9/11 TV fakery smoke and mirrors" then look up "September 11th as it happened CBS part 2", skip to about 2:45 do you see any duplicated smoke??"
2ctrain 2 years ago
@2ctrain What point are they trying to make with duplicate smoke? Seems incredibly unlegitimate. I haven't even heard anything about that. I always based my reasoning on the way the infrustructure was deliberately rigged for explosives and the evidence of thermite remains. Well just part of my reasoning. I dont know what the hell the mirrors and smoke are about.
sorryifioffendedu 2 years ago
@sorryifioffendedu
It seems they are pulling for the "Missile w/ fake plane edited in theory" I only have two questions why make a completely faked video, and two, why isn't the evidence presented by "Loose Change" "Zeitgeist" enough, why do we need to push it so much to the point of making a phoney video?
2ctrain 2 years ago
@2ctrain It's people like this who make people who actually research 9/11 look like imbicils. Being someone who thinks 9/11 is completely an inside job, I still think this is phoney and distasteful. It's like people make up fake shit to sway others into thinking their own way, just for the sake of doing so. So did you watch those documentaries? What did you think?
sorryifioffendedu 2 years ago
uhm if they were faking it why would they do it the hard way?
OfficialCarmenGort 2 years ago
it's not a fucking hoax
lockdrop565 2 years ago
yes it is
SheerPandemonium 2 years ago
@lockdrop565 thank you
I gave you a thumbs up but they're are two many idiots who are convinced by dramatic music and video footage so you still have negative thumbs down :)
2ctrain 2 years ago
why dont you do a google search for the architects who have come together, architects who build these skyscrapers, who will present real evidence that it was controlled demolition. then come back here and tell us all how to feel about the government. asshole.
MrBluegreenred 2 years ago
@MrBluegreenred
lets be civil now
2ctrain 2 years ago
I just glanced over the comments on this video..... Who ever believes that tha US govt. had anything to do with this is an idiot....
imax1971 2 years ago
you sir are trolling
haloover 2 years ago
you're an idiot
SheerPandemonium 2 years ago
how the fuck is it hoax,why would they bomb there own building,to get fear.
Fuck for retarted,
I bet your giong to say well there where exsplotians at the base or the colums in the midle go down.I have a kid like you in class,im 14 and i know it not A FUCKING HOAX
lockdrop565 2 years ago
Well there were inner explosions which caused the infrastructure to fall at freefall rate. Also the 47 support columns were cut diagnally in a demolishion style fashion. Remnants of thermite were found indicating internal explosives. Besides that, NORAD failed to intercept the planes over 7 times in one day, and before 9/11 they had ovr 150 intercepts with 100% accuracy. Simultanious to the attack Dick Chaney issued a practice interception mission causing radar confusion. Conspiracy? Yes.
sorryifioffendedu 2 years ago
Where is your evidance? That there were explosives i can use physics to tell you are wrong about bombs. You guys scare me.
Catstalker666 1 year ago
@Catstalker666 whoa relax pseudo scientist. You can use physics, are you walking down to the site and taking debris samples? lol Ok...I can use logic and reason.
sorryifioffendedu 1 year ago
No i live in new york witnessed the attack and i think about it. First the hologhram theory is fake because i knew people on two different planes. Also the bomb theory is fake because first the beams melted then were pushed to their elastic limit and broke the pressure inside then blewout the windows making it look like a bomb. And thanks for that smart ass comment i went down their to help and pay respect all you do is laugh about the deaths of 3,000 people.
Catstalker666 1 year ago
@Catstalker666 i agree anyone who says this is a conspiracy, i wonder how they got out of the mental institution long enough to use a computer.
TropnevadNitsuj 1 year ago
That is just grazing the surface of the evidence. However this is all my own opinion.
sorryifioffendedu 2 years ago 2
Why would u not belive the goverment would not have done this?? It all comes down to controll the people... U have a lot odf learning to do... LOok at they do our food are water and everything else
123JUJUBE 2 years ago
@123JUJUBE you can't even speak english correctly and you expect people to consider you credible?
another thing
Controlling the people, what people?!, there is no one in the world more controlled than United States Citizens granted some are Idiots but there wasn't any need to "control" the people
2ctrain 2 years ago
lol sorry I just read my comment yeah it's pretty bad spelling... but look up Haarp and wearther control
123JUJUBE 2 years ago
@123JUJUBE harp and weather control huh,
on youtube?
2ctrain 2 years ago
well just on the net does not matter if it's youtube or not
123JUJUBE 2 years ago
Haarp
123JUJUBE 2 years ago
HAARP lol dumb ass
Catstalker666 1 year ago
@imax1971 thank you
2ctrain 2 years ago
it is proved by the laws of phyics that these place most definatley could not have caused these huges towers to collapse. it is impossible. the structure was actually built 20x stronger than it needed to be. it was an inside job by the american goverment
MrBobnotfred 2 years ago 14
@MrBobnotfred unless you have a degree in physics and architectural engineering, I do not want to hear your bullshit theories.
ryanjoerger 1 year ago
actuall you are wrong do th reaourself. All of the buildings main supporters were on the outside of the building. When the plane hit it melted the supports on the beams then the beams were at the breaking point of their elastic limits which caused it to collapse in on itself. Then when you see windows blowing out it is not explosives it is compression. When the buildings windows blew out it was caused by the compresion from the floors above. So the pressure blew out the windows.
Catstalker666 1 year ago
@Catstalker666 hahaha
haneysbighouse 1 year ago
Comment removed
Catstalker666 1 year ago
@MrBobnotfred bumble bees also cant fly according to physics
anothawhiteboy 1 year ago
@MrBobnotfred
yes WTC was overengineered like any skyscraper at that time.... also WTC was built to whitstand plane strikes
lujagoa 1 year ago
@MrBobnotfred the fact that you can't spell 'definitely' doesn't do your ridiculous theory any favours.
contactnoel2 1 year ago 4
@contactnoel2 that's right!!! wrong spelling only proves that there's no conpiracy!!! right? MrBobnotfred? can i call you fred?
Albertp64 1 year ago
@contactnoel2 a little weak bro! i'm a doctor and i always spell it DEFINATELY, LOL!
@justicepartyuk Henry Ford had this to say
The only statement I care to make about The Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.
READ AT dollarpages [x] org
see also
BANKOFBC [X] COM & BANKOFBC [X] CA
KILLERSPRAY [X] COM & KILLERSPRAY [X] CA
t i n y u r l [x] com / kjvkjvkjv
vhsjvc 1 year ago
@vhsjvc I'm a Chevy man but Ford was right about that.(the protocals of zion that is)
Canuck4Truth 1 year ago
@Canuck4Truth *protocols*
V
V
Canuck4Truth 1 year ago
@contactnoel2 @MrBobnotfred at least recognizes truth, unlike yourself. go get a glass of koolaid, white bread with margarine, and the remote. THEN after 20 hours, brush with plenty of fluoride, then have a coke, and when you are 30 then take plenty of cholesterol pills ;-)
vhsjvc 1 year ago
@MrBobnotfred you obviously didnt do ANY research to prove your point, in 2005 MIT did a study and took the same exact type of steel with fireproofing and all, and put it over a fire (fueled by jet fuel) and they said that it "weakened the steel dramtically...the debris from the jet and offices would 'sandblast' so to speak the fire coating off of the strengthened steel, that with the weight of the floors above it could easily cause catastrophic failure staring with the damaged supports"
geterhero 1 year ago
@geterhero damn straight! these conspiracy theorists love using terms like 'laws of physics' and 'proven' without any back up. The collapses clearly start from the impact sites on both buildings, and steel doesn't need to be melted for it to be weak enough to break. Its not hard to find true facts but some folks just potter around youtube watching this tripe...
y9dnkbe 1 year ago
@y9dnkbe Explain to me how all 3 towers fell at near free fall speed, with no deceleration...and everything being pulverized to dust? Do you subscribe to the pile driver/pancake theory? Even IF there was sufficient weight (from the stories above) to pile drive some of the stories below, that wouldn't explain why that effect would continue all the way down...taking the path of GREATEST resistance!
In each collapse, you can see that there is nothing left to qualify as a pile driver!
True facts?!
Bongofury361 1 year ago
@Bongofury361 The twin towers didnt fall too close to free-fall, plenty of conspiracy theorists will agree to that these days. WTC7 is different, but im no expert - im sure you are though ;)
y9dnkbe 1 year ago
@y9dnkbe Your here ? These conspiracy theorists this, these conspiracy theorists that..What is your explanation for three impossible events ALL ON THE SAME DAY. To me a dead give away IS THE TONS OF DUST. Dust is created when things are pulverized, or demolished, not in some ridiculous gravitational nonsense. Steel buildings don't just give up the ghost and fall into millions of pieces unless they are blown up. Damn there is evidence of the explosives in the tons of dust.
MrRiceowlex 1 year ago
@MrRiceowlex Oh look, another expert! Oh, the dust is your proof and if I can't explain it then there's even more proof! It was a day of firsts, not impossibilities. You honestly believe every inch of the towers were rigged with explosives? I don't, I think there's far, far easier ways to have done it. If I were to do it I'd rig it to come down and claim it was another car bomb. Far easier to tie to Osama and far easier to quell the conspiracy theorists that pop up when anything happens.
y9dnkbe 1 year ago
Pearl Harbor II
gedet 2 years ago
"what is truth?" - Pontius Pilate
What is retarded? Thinking it would take MORE than crashing two jets into the WTC to get America into WWIII. You don't know anything about how American's think, and you don't know anything about how Criminals think. You have the minds of children.
worldpolicenow 2 years ago
It wasnt 'staged', it actually happened, but they knew it was going to happen and infact let it happen! 9/11 was an inside job! They are now admitting that they wanted a war in middle east before hand, and this was a perfect excuse! Anyone who thinks otherwise needs to come forward with actual facts and not media 'facts'. So we are pure scum for seeking the truth? Define TRUTH. TRUTH is what actually happened and not what you are lead to believe happened!
robbrayshaw09 2 years ago
so what do you suspect happened to that plane? its not like it could just disappear.
FLPanthersandMarlins 2 years ago
There are alot of different things that happend that the government lied about. For instance the 757 they said crashed over Penn infact did not crash.
The 757 they said crashed into the Pentagon, was not the plane claimed, it was much much smaller.
The twin tower is the most confusing one. The speed that the planes were flying at, a normal AA plane could not do those speeds, it's so fast the plane would rip apart. Controlled demolition in the building. Look it up.
sl0wm03 2 years ago
yea the controlled demolition thing is what my friend told me.
FLPanthersandMarlins 2 years ago
extra ordinary theories require extra ordinary facts. Theories can be proven or disproven using scientific knoweldge. Anyone who thinks any of this is staged is scum pure and simple.
criptikclues 2 years ago
The metal bars used in construction were coated with flammable substances; this was the 'first' time in history the flight recording boxes were never found; those boxes could hold crucial evidence to the people flying the plane and their intent; many former 9/11 workers claim to have seen and a few have even heard the recordings; the few that have heard it are being constantly followed, harrassed, bugged, and threatened to ensure they don't tell anyone; do you want to hear more?
Hlover01 2 years ago
Look up Operation Northwoods.
sl0wm03 2 years ago
@criptikclues,
>> extra ordinary theories require extra ordinary facts.
-- extraordinary stupidy requires extraordinary ignorance.
MikeSPx24bj9 1 year ago
with that kind of video quality you can hardly call that evidence,
Imskyhigh87 2 years ago
sic-em! Said for a long time that if a 757 did actually hit the Pentagon - they would still be airing footage on TV to drum up support for the "war on terror." Wake up people - we are the "terrorists!"
TheJm8284 2 years ago
Maybe you guys should consider:
Google: september clues..
MomentariIy 2 years ago
What bullshit. Find a better hobby, moron.
jtp0321 2 years ago
this is just the dumbest thing i have ever seen...cant believe i wasted my time watching this clowns video
Duckman9000 2 years ago
My problem with the people who believe 9/11 was set up by our government is simple.If the planes weren't hijacked by terrorists,then who were they hijacked by?Do you have proof of whom,or just theories?What happened to the people on board who called their loved ones about the situation?Were the calls faked and they're fine?Why would Osama deliberately claim responsibility of the attacks if he didn't plan the deed?These are questions you must consider when believing the conspiracy you hold to.
AceofClubs11 2 years ago
do you have proof that it was done by 19 ragtag hijackers from afgan? oh a passport that flew thru the fireball onto the street? by the way id like to see evidence of osama saying it was him, i have seen 2 of him saying it wasnt him.
kamikazedude 2 years ago
the fact is i do have evidence.But why show it to you?Like you're really going to be satisfied with the facts.That's why you're a conspiracy theorist!You love to hypothesize and contemplate the real "hidden" truth,when the truth is staring you in the face.
AceofClubs11 2 years ago
You simply don't have evidence. You seen the news just like all the other people that are believing without testing.
Kind of like how thermite was found all over the place at ground zero, in every amount of debris. If you don't know what thermite is, look it up. That's already enough evidence to prove something else happend than a plane crashing and the WTC falling within an hour of burning. Record time, RECORD First time ANY steel building fell. FOR 3 STEEL BUILDING IN ONE DAY
sl0wm03 2 years ago
Have you even looked up what thermite is? Thermite doesn't explode. It doesn't even burn vertically. And first time three steel buildings fell in one day? You do realize that planes filled with jet fuel flew straight into the buildings right? The steel was weakened by the extreme heat, the center of gravity shifted and the building could no longer hold the weight it once did. Where the hell is your evidence?
codyt321 2 years ago
I know thermite doesn't explode, have you looked it up? when thermite is lit on fire it produces real extreme heat. Do you realize that all the jet fuel blew up on impact at the beginning of the crash, that's what the huge fireball going into the air was, all jet fuel.
Do you realize that building 7 didn't get hit by an airplane?
there was jumpers right? how is it that they were jumping out of the impact hole, where this steel melting fire is located?
These buildings were made to take plane's
sl0wm03 2 years ago
so you're assuming ALL the jet fuel went in one direction? You talk about evidence, where is your evidence that there was thermite found at building 7. The report says it was hit by debris off the world trade towers. What is your evidence that the report is wrong? Where is there any evidence that jumpers jumped out of the impact hole? The buildings were not designed to have a commercial airliner blow into the side of it. 9/11 was an unprecedented event.
codyt321 2 years ago
No, it's not an assumption, jet fuel is more flammable than gasoline an it would completely burn up within the first 10 minutes. it's like your trying to defend whats looking at you in the face.
/watch?v=KcC6bTHosx0
this one below, is pure evidence, go to 1:45 in and hear what leaseholder of WTC 7 has to say.
/watch?v=iEuJimaumW4
and YES, these building were built to withstand a plane impact
i'm not sitting making up bullshit man, an if the facts didn't prove this, there would be no argue
sl0wm03 2 years ago
So what if would burn up in ten minutes? The explosion would of done a massive amount of damage to the buildings. Yes there were DESIGNED to take an impact, but no one designed these buildings with commercial jet liners in mind. You're using the same old out of context "pull it" clip? Please, that's a HUGE assumption. That he was talking with demolition lingo (which isn't even used when talking about explosives). Just because someone makes an argument doesn't make it valid.
codyt321 2 years ago
It's not out of context, the man said "they made the decision to pull, and we watched the building collapse" It is a huge assumption. More of the reason why people don't trust the government. Why did they pull the bomb sniffing dogs 20 days before 911, why did the owner take out like a 15mil insurance claim before the attacks. Why are they not releasing more videos of the Pentagon plane when they caught it on at LEAST 5 different angles at the most secure place in the world.
sl0wm03 2 years ago
That what's out of context. Your claiming he meant that they "pulled" to blow up the building when its clear from the entire interview they pulled the men out b/c they thought it was going to collapse. The risk to cover up 9/11 alone makes a conspiracy irrational. If the republican part was caught, they would lose power for the next century. The false premise you start off with is that you expect the govt. to be super efficient when they're obviously not. They couldn't even cover up a blow job.
codyt321 2 years ago
The entire interview also said there was no firemen in the building, because none was needed, they evacuated all the people out of building 7 before 1 and 2 collapsed.
If you also watched the rest of the video, you heard what the professionals said about the building collapsing too. Professionals, they're not some theorist. Almost anyone knows just from seeing other demolitions that the buildings collapse inward. Why did it not fall leaning towards where all damage was done on one side.
sl0wm03 2 years ago
It did. The hole in the penthouse on the east side and the debris damage on the west side made it the weakest part of the building and therefore the north and south side fell inwards. It fell exactly like it was supposed to. If this was such a huge conspiracy, how many people do you think would be needed to carry it out? Do you really believe that so many people could keep such a devastating secret?
codyt321 2 years ago
Not according to the NIST report on WTC 7. According to that debris damage played no role in its collapse other than initiating the fires that