do i have a.d.d., or is professor dirzo 8:45 really hard to understand? at 16:16 he tries to make a funny and gets a bleak reply from the audience. its like he's getting a raging "brainer"over fernald or something hehe...
I am an Agnostic, this means I don't believe there are such things as atheists, because no ONE can be 100% sure there is no God and no one can be 100% there is one either, doubt is natural to normal human beings.
Both of these refer to belief, a subjective state we can be 100% sure of, cognito ergo sum.
Psychological doubt has nothing to do with epistemic certainty. Over-certainty seems to be more prevalent in nature - few doubt the existence of the external world despite epistemic uncertainty- though this varies.
There's no such thing as a theist either (by this definition) as you can never be 100% sure there is no God.
Unless you consciously consider yourself agnostic toward "2+2=4" and "A=A," your being incredulously vague with regards to your true beliefs when it comes to whatever specific definition of god is being debated. If you accept ockham's razor and inferential logic usually, why not in the case of God?
You wouldn't accept that we can't disprove a world eating serpent called "sea" because another definition of 'sea' is true, don't let god's slippery definition fool u, some r true, some not
note - i don't disagree that we technically have to be agnostic toward the existence of the external world, etc, but its not something we tend to live by or consciously take notice of, plus we can be much more certain the things our perceptions (Which need explanation) are most simply and coherently interpreted in terms of are likely to be true, than things which do not conform to as many perceptions or only do so in a convoluted way involving many assumptions. 50:50 agnosticism copout
@14oren No one can be 100% sure there are no mermaids either....there will ALWAYS be some idiot that would put more emphasis on being debatably correct than to focus on evidence for or lack thereof.
NO ONE can be 100% there is one (mermaid) or isn't one either, doubt is natural to normal human beings.
This has been flagged as spam show
Stanford literally has the most number of greatest professors in the greater part of America.
grunder20 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Good work Darwin!!
grunder20 2 months ago
Take a child and isolate them from supernatural belief to adulthood and see if they believe in a god.
Behavior and belief is culturally influenced by the environment we're reared in.
blaziermissy 1 year ago
@blaziermissy Guess what! Your wish came true goo.gl / rKFnM
sayedzeeshan 1 month ago
do i have a.d.d., or is professor dirzo 8:45 really hard to understand? at 16:16 he tries to make a funny and gets a bleak reply from the audience. its like he's getting a raging "brainer"over fernald or something hehe...
anthonycarl2020 1 year ago
I am an Agnostic, this means I don't believe there are such things as atheists, because no ONE can be 100% sure there is no God and no one can be 100% there is one either, doubt is natural to normal human beings.
14oren 1 year ago
@14oren
Both of these refer to belief, a subjective state we can be 100% sure of, cognito ergo sum.
Psychological doubt has nothing to do with epistemic certainty. Over-certainty seems to be more prevalent in nature - few doubt the existence of the external world despite epistemic uncertainty- though this varies.
There's no such thing as a theist either (by this definition) as you can never be 100% sure there is no God.
Unless your this agnostic about
unassumption 1 year ago
@14oren
Unless you consciously consider yourself agnostic toward "2+2=4" and "A=A," your being incredulously vague with regards to your true beliefs when it comes to whatever specific definition of god is being debated. If you accept ockham's razor and inferential logic usually, why not in the case of God?
You wouldn't accept that we can't disprove a world eating serpent called "sea" because another definition of 'sea' is true, don't let god's slippery definition fool u, some r true, some not
unassumption 1 year ago
@14oren
note - i don't disagree that we technically have to be agnostic toward the existence of the external world, etc, but its not something we tend to live by or consciously take notice of, plus we can be much more certain the things our perceptions (Which need explanation) are most simply and coherently interpreted in terms of are likely to be true, than things which do not conform to as many perceptions or only do so in a convoluted way involving many assumptions. 50:50 agnosticism copout
unassumption 1 year ago
@14oren That's not the definition of atheism.
akrulla 1 year ago
@14oren No one can be 100% sure there are no mermaids either....there will ALWAYS be some idiot that would put more emphasis on being debatably correct than to focus on evidence for or lack thereof.
NO ONE can be 100% there is one (mermaid) or isn't one either, doubt is natural to normal human beings.
blaziermissy 1 year ago
4. In Bible, we find two (2) candidates to be called GOD, but atheists are arguing just
with ONE,not with other pretendent.
5. Mostly atheist, are against God's morality and justice
but never refer the same to other candidate: satan.
6. Bible maintans evolution after creation, earth have billions of years etc.
Atheism is a dead concept.
Acmd7 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God exist! evidences:
1. In Bible we find a lot of prophecies which happened and are happening.
2. If anybody will follow what God asks (ex: praying), everybody will have whatever they (ask)
want (somebody can call it miracles).
3. Blasphemies: if anybody will do it, is puniched very soon and anybody is free to try it,
even right now!
Acmd7 1 year ago
Thanks so much to Stanford University for this series!! Fantastic!!
ryanb9 2 years ago 9