J'ai acheté un Canon Mark II à la FNAC après avoir longuement hésité entre Canon et Nikon. Au bout d'une journée, le miroir s'est désolidarisé sans raison (pas de choc, rien). Je n'ai pris que 10 photos. Je passe à la FNAC et dis j'espérais un geste, au moins des excuses et un matériel neuf... Rien de tout cela. On m'a rendu un matériel réparé. Service déplorable. Pour un matériel de ce prix, c'est inadmissible. Je regrette amèrement mon choix Canon et, côté service, m’interroge sur la FNAC.
canon 5d mark ii for sale with 2 lens 24-105 mm and a 50 mm and battery with charger also 2 16gb flash memory cards and a speed light flash inbox me if you are interested great condition !!!!
I know the reason why the camera quality looks so good on the 5d is becuase its a full frame cmos censor, but whats the difference between the other censors? Like whats so much better with a full frame?
@inam0001 why do you gotta ruin my perfectly good lark... do you not see the link between aperture and pupils ? have you even read your own comment ? because it is the very same chill level. which by the way is probably not the only comment that i had read before i hit the reply button don't you think.
Nice depth-of-field. I can only get that by standing back quite a bit and zooming in with my camera, which can't be done in lots of rooms. How close is the camera here?
@1simonmatthews Not trying to be a douche here, but just a hint. Zooming in doesnt affect your depth of field, but magnification does. If you frame something exactly the same way with a 35mm f/2.8 lens compared to a 300mm f/2.8 lens the dof is similiar. Of course the picture might look somewhat different because of the field of view, but im just talking about pure bokeh-licious backgrounds ;-)
@laxativee Don't know about you, but zooming in definitely affects the depth-of-field on my camera anyway. As I say, if I stand back away from the subject and zoom in, anything behind or in front of the subject becomes out of focus. That's shallow depth-of-field, or shallow focus, isn't it? And if I don't zoom in then everything remains in focus, which is deep focus. Hence, zooming in affects depth-of-field. If I zoom in, the depth-of-field is affected.
@1simonmatthews To make it a bit more clear. If you are not moving forwards or backwards and only zoom on your subject - thus framing your subject tighter - the depth of field will be and appear to be very much thinner, but as i said, if you use the same framing, your focal length is not going to affect your depth of field. Only your aperture and the size of your sensor (which actually only changes the magnification too).
@laxativee And to make it a bit more clear to you. If I wish to achieve shallow depth-of-field with my Sony DSR 200 video camera and the one built in lens that it has, I zoom in on the subject and stand back further. If I don't zoom in and obtain the same framing then the depth-of-field is not shallow and everything is in focus. Zooming in DOES affect the depth-of-field. This is simply a fact that I could demonstrate easily enough.
@laxativee No, you are wrong. Here's one paragraph copied and pasted from an article on the subject, and there's many more: The "trick" is to let the camera focus in macro mode while you're optically zoomed all the way in. "Tighter zoom is shallower DOF" and Macro Reduces the DOF even more.
Note the part about the zoom affecting the DOF? Sorry but I think perhaps you should teach yourself a little more before you attempt to teach other people. Stop being a douche ;)
@laxativee And another one: ZOOM! Set your camera on full zoom – but NOT digital zoom. If you don’t know the difference, look at the little bar that comes up when you zoom. There will be a line or a marker where it crosses into ‘digital zoom’. NEVER use digital zoom, it’s just cropping your pic in the camera, you can do that later. So zoom in as far as you can. Yes, this will mean you have to back up across the room to get everything you want in frame, but it makes a difference. Want more?
@1simonmatthews What if i just happen to own fixed focal length lenses? My 5D2 doesn't even have a digital zoom. Odd for you to attack me like that. I know what i'm talking about and my point stays. Hack, i wouldn't be shooting professionally if i didn't know even the basics about lenses and depth of field. If you frame a subject the same way (ie same magnification) the only thing that affects your depth of field is your aperture. It doesn't matter what focal length you are shooting with.
@laxativee What do you mean attack you? You started by telling me that zooming in doesn't affect depth-of-field, and I told you that it does and provided evidence to support my claim. Zooming in DOES affect depth-of-field. Jeez, I've copied and pasted from articles on photography that explain that zooming in affects depth-of-field. You need to research this fact because you have obviously overlooked it. And by the way, I have a professional qualification in photography myself.
@laxativee Ah I see what has happened here. Don't worry, my comment that starts "Zoom! Set your camera on full zoom..." was just copied and pasted from an article that explains how to achieve shallow depth-of-field by zoomin in. It appears that I was telling you to "Zoom!" but don't worry, I wasn't. It wasn't an attack. That whole comment was copied and pasted, apart from the last two words asking if you wanted more evidence. Trust me, DOF is affected by zooming in with an optical zoom. Friends?
@1simonmatthews I'm starting to get annoying, i'm sure, but zooming in really doesn't change depth of field. It just makes the depth of field appear to be smaller, because of the magnification and field of view. It's explained pretty well in the article i hinted you to look at. No harm done though. I'm just not giving up ;)
@laxativee Mate, try to listen, I copied and pasted from two photography articles that actually state in words that zooming in obtains shallower depth-of-field. Here is one again:
"Tighter zoom is shallower DOF."
Can you understand those words? They don't say "Tighter zoom makes the DOF appear shallower", they say "Tighter zoom IS shallower DOF". Plain and simple. And I know that it is true because I've done it! You may not if you don't even have a zoom. You need to learn more.
@laxativee Depth-Of-Field is just the distance between the nearest and furthest objects in a scene that appear in focus. If I place two objects on my coffee table a foot apart and film them whilst zoomed out, they both appear in focus. But if I zoom in with my optical zoom and then stand back to obtain the same framing, only one of the objects will be in focus. This is shallow focus. Would you like to wager a bet on this? Because I can film this (with two cameras) to prove it right now.
@1simonmatthews You need to learn the difference of what IS a short depth of field compared to what APPEARS to be short depth of field. It's all just about field of view and magnification fooling you to think that the depth of field is smaller. Go ahead, measure the circle of confusion with a depth of field calculator. You wont find a difference between a 300/2.8 lens compared to a 35/2.8 lens when shooting with the same magnification and aperture.
@laxativee This is copied and pasted from the web definition of Depth-Of-Field: "In optics, particularly as it relates to film and photography, depth of field (DOF) is the distance between the nearest and farthest objects in a scene that appear acceptably sharp in an image." Now, as I have repeatedly explained, zooming in with an optical zoom will shorten the distance needed between two objects to obtain shallow DOF. One object WILL be out of focus. An object cannot SEEM to be out of focus!
@laxativee Now I've repeatedly proven my case by copying and pasting from articles on the subject. The last comment I made simply cannot be argued. It's PROOF that what I say is correct. It is a simple fact that you need to accept. You obviously have a problem in accepting things. Now, I'll ask you one last time, do you want to put money on it because if you do then I'll make a video that will PROVE my case right here and now. Otherwise, go and do some more research, you're getting on my nerves.
@laxativee Do you even know that if you zoom in with an optical zoom that nearby objects that were originally in focus will become blurry? That IS shallow DOF. Is this something you have even tried? Or are you arguing about something that you haven't even tried yourself? Do yourself a favour, type in something like "Shallow focus by zooming in" and actually try to learn about it instead of remaining so incorrigible. Get yourself a camera with optical focus and try it out so that you know.
@1simonmatthews I've tested it out with several optics and yes, im willing to bet money on it. I'm 100% positive that zooming in ie the focal length doesn't affect depth of field but just makes a background appear more blurred because of the field of view ie what some people call telephoto "compression". If you actually went out and tested it out you'd notice that the circle of confusion will be identical with a photo framed the same way, regardless of the focal length.
@laxativee If the background appears more blurred after zooming in, as you say, then that IS shallower depth-of-field than before zooming in. How can it be anything else? I want you to copy and paste the definition of the term "Depth-Of-Field" from a web article, just so that we both know the meaning of the term. Can you do that please? Just search "Depth-Of-Field" and copy and paste from the article ok. Thanks.
@laxativee No, no, for the purpose of this argument and so that it's on record here for both of us to see, copy and paste the meaning of the term "Depth-Of-Field" please. What's the matter? Don't you want to? I wonder why?
@1simonmatthews So you want me to take a snip out of an article just to provide you with a quote that loosely might be understood as if your point of view is the correct one. It's optics, it can't be quoted in one sentence like it's done on super ultra pro digital photography magazine 5000.
@1simonmatthews Put it simply. Depth of field is the area in focus ie the area with an acceptable circle of confusion. Zooming in doesnt change circle of confusion thus not affecting depth of field even if it looks like it because of the magnification and field of view. Things will APPERAR more blurred because they are viewed LARGER due to the smaller FIELD OF VIEW. I know its a pain to get, but it's also the truth.
@laxativee So Depth-Of-Field is "The area in focus" - your words. And zooming in with an optical zoom ALTERS the "area in focus". It doesn't APPEAR to alter the area in focus - it actually ALTERS the "area in focus". If I don't zoom in, two objects a foot apart will BOTH be in focus - if I zoom in, one object will be in focus and one will be "out of focus". Can you understand this simple English? Or do you have a problem with English comprehension? I'm going to swear at you soon.
@1simonmatthews No. Depth of field is not the area in focus. Depth of field is the area where circle of confusion is acceptable. The area in focus is much smaller. See, if you print a photo compared to a web sized 800x533 photo the printed one will appear to have a bigger depth of field due to the fact that its more magnified. Same thing with zooming occurs.
@laxativee "Depth of field is the area in focus..."
"No. Depth of field is not the area in focus"
Both are YOUR WORDS.
"Things will APPERAR more blurred" An object cannot "APPEAR" to be blurred. It is either blurred or it is not blurred. That's a fact. You sir are an idiot.
@laxativee Not quite. I asked you a question. Are you trying to tell me that an object that appears blurred is actually in sharp focus? Because that is what your comment implies. Can you answer that question whilst I wait for my Depth-Of-Field Demo that proves you are wrong to upload?
@laxativee Right, my video proof is uploaded now. The title is Depth Of Field Demo Using Optical Zoom On A Sony DSR 200 Camcorder. You'll find it on my channel. The video shows two tins of food. By zooming in I am able to throw one of the tins out of focus. This means that the act of zooming in affected the DOF, because that's what DOF is. There's no two ways about it. I know you won't admit it though because you are a douche.
@1simonmatthews After all, we'd all hate to disagree with the undisputed leader in the optics industry, Carl Zeiss? My point it clearly staten and proved in the following document. Taking all your information from a 5 buck photography related magazine wont get you far in the world of physics.
@1simonmatthews I found a good article every photographer seriously wanting to know something about depth of field and also controlling it. Maybe you'll read it a few times and then try out yourself.
Google it up. Depth of Field and One of the Greatest Illusions of All Time! by Walter Graff
@cheetodude24 i do believe that distance among simply semi expert and professional is little now. d7000 is all everyone need. check out... freedslr . c0m change 0 with o and get a way to bring home completely new Nikon D7000
The problem with this is that the 5D is SO damn good, and the lighting on this just happen to be SO damn good... I wanna know what happens next; I wanna see them run out for those "much needed supplies."
@watchyourvideo No, it's a magical camera. Every woman appears beautiful using this camera. In real life she's all snaggle toothed, and frizzy haired.
some of you guys really need to get out more. she's beautiful with, what we could see from 30 seconds, has a good spirit, but there are plenty of fish in the sea that are just as beautiful with the same kind presence. nice clip regardless.
i tried to record on the same level but somehow the quality of mine is some kind of noise (y). whats the problem? what is the 30p mode and where can i change it.
my preference 24-70mm f2.8 iso 6400 full hd with a compactflash card with 30mb transferrate
@r0nej00 as I have not videoed straight for over 30 minutes I cannot comment further, but as I said that is in the manual. For overheating as a problem..... I don't think that would be a problem for me as I video at present in night temperatures from 2' C to 12' C so maybe it would do a auto-cool....
@r0nej00 Thanks for the reassuring information, I just didn't want to invest in something that would be old technology when I got it. But now I know thanks again!
hi, i was wondering if you could quickly tell me something.
i wanted to get a canon 500D or 50D, because the 5D was too expensive. i wanted it primarily for video, but i recently found out that the 500D and 50D dont record audio and they dont actually record video unless the camera is plugged into the computer via USB. my question is; clearly the 5D has audio recording aswell, but does it actually have a video function? or does it too have to be plugged in to the computer in order to record?thnx
@thomasgoodin Hi, was just watching this clip and saw your question, not my business, but as no-one had answered you.... yes it does have video capabilities and with fast card can run a 30 minute clip without any problem and more if needed.
I have a 5D Mk II and am still learning about it's function settings.
wow this video is amazingly clear!!!! i sO want the 5D but cOst sO much.. i think ill just have to settle with the 7D.. $1000 difference is kinda alot of money :( but man! everytime i watch a 5D Mark ii video compared to the 7D i just think twice again
Thanks for shooting without all the bells and whistles, because that's what I've been waiting to see. You know just how it would look just shooting straight out of the package. Looks great!!
haha I was wondering what kind of hd cameras were available, and the canon 4d mark 2 impressed me the most so i decided to search it on youtube and i clicked on this vid....the funny part is that you have videos of me.....i march blue devils snareline.
@TuamLis not exactly correct, it shoots 12 minutes with a 4GB card but if you have say 32GB it shoots 30 mins stops, then 30 mins, etc. til the card is full.
holy FUCK BALLS. This camera fucking blows my shit every time I see a video. Like what the FUCK. Honestly. It turns any lighting into like, the PERFECT scenario.. I MUST HAVE THIS CAMERA!!! OMG!! O_O
I hope I could say HAPPY BIRTHDAY to her ...
ferrarijm9 4 days ago
Can you share your rendering settings on Sony Vegas that you used. I know you mention H.264 codec.
staticfast 2 weeks ago
geez I don't have three grand.
hippykiller1 2 weeks ago
hello r0nej00 ,i was wondering about your opininon about somethingg...
what are the best exporting settings in adobe premier cs5 ,i mean HDr for youtube,la-1993@hotmail.com(we aslo can talk here). thanks in advance
bllaproduction 2 weeks ago
I am getting this for Christmas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2Cool4Games 1 month ago
she so cute
alwahaj2008 3 months ago 5
its been a while since i have watched this , and i fall in love every time
haaristwof 3 months ago in playlist Liked 3
been a while since i watched this i fall in love every time ,
haaristwof 3 months ago in playlist Liked
This has been flagged as spam show
J'ai acheté un Canon Mark II à la FNAC après avoir longuement hésité entre Canon et Nikon. Au bout d'une journée, le miroir s'est désolidarisé sans raison (pas de choc, rien). Je n'ai pris que 10 photos. Je passe à la FNAC et dis j'espérais un geste, au moins des excuses et un matériel neuf... Rien de tout cela. On m'a rendu un matériel réparé. Service déplorable. Pour un matériel de ce prix, c'est inadmissible. Je regrette amèrement mon choix Canon et, côté service, m’interroge sur la FNAC.
RogerTorrenti 3 months ago
so beautiful and cute...I mean the girl
Nicshooter 3 months ago
Perfect !
GlebZAZ 3 months ago
booo!
ilifeform 3 months ago
Great video keep up the good work.
NewAgeDirector 4 months ago
Wow, she's gorgeous!
FrootAnime 4 months ago
holy shit is she on drugs her pupils are hella big
KHANHcept 4 months ago
Facebook Brian William Hodgman
BrianWH2012 5 months ago
I'm too young for her .. haha
EatenChiken 6 months ago
Hi
BrianWH2012 6 months ago
@charvelgtrs lol
MJthegoat 6 months ago
canon 5d mark ii for sale with 2 lens 24-105 mm and a 50 mm and battery with charger also 2 16gb flash memory cards and a speed light flash inbox me if you are interested great condition !!!!
ricoskitso 6 months ago
@ricoskitso why is it for sale?
computerjantje 6 months ago
@computerjantje IM STARTING SCHOOL AND I NEED A LITTLE EXTRA CASH!
ricoskitso 6 months ago
25TH DOCUMENTARY HEY, CAN I SEE 24TH, BY THE WAY, IT IS A COOL VIDEO, I LIKE :)
10mism 7 months ago
at 0:08 seconds it went out of focus, and then again a second or so later. Not what I would expect from such an expensive camera.
M1thotyn 7 months ago
@M1thotyn haha its all manual focus. blame the cameraman or send him back to canon maybe ;)
blazetblaze 6 months ago
@M1thotyn thats due to the lens, not the camera...., its an effect that can actually add to the overal composition or look you want to achieve.
ScottFreeStyle99 7 months ago
hot :F
EnZaiTHuse 7 months ago
she wants to jump your bones dude!
mendebil 7 months ago
I know the reason why the camera quality looks so good on the 5d is becuase its a full frame cmos censor, but whats the difference between the other censors? Like whats so much better with a full frame?
MashputopRODUCTIONS 8 months ago
focus was in and out, a little distracting.
jessi330 8 months ago
dude her eyes pupils are like HUGEE
inam0001 8 months ago
@inam0001 She did drugs
just kidding lol it looks a bit dark where she is, im sure it's the reason
blackxthink 8 months ago
@blackxthink good point :P
inam0001 8 months ago
@inam0001 Huge pupils ? Dude why do you think he's using F2.8.
broadcastsfromearth 8 months ago
@broadcastsfromearth chill out .. u need to see the comments before u talk :)
inam0001 8 months ago
@inam0001 why do you gotta ruin my perfectly good lark... do you not see the link between aperture and pupils ? have you even read your own comment ? because it is the very same chill level. which by the way is probably not the only comment that i had read before i hit the reply button don't you think.
broadcastsfromearth 8 months ago
@broadcastsfromearth trol... if u had a life you wouldn't give a shit .. so yeh.. grow up ..
inam0001 8 months ago
@inam0001 yes thanks for the advice, if only i was as mature as you
broadcastsfromearth 8 months ago
Felt in love!
angelazul7 8 months ago
amazing depth of focus, I love it.
studiobranch 8 months ago
a 24-70 :'( i want it
cdave2006 8 months ago
she reminds me A LOT of emma roberts
KangarooBird121 9 months ago
Nice depth-of-field. I can only get that by standing back quite a bit and zooming in with my camera, which can't be done in lots of rooms. How close is the camera here?
1simonmatthews 9 months ago
@1simonmatthews Not trying to be a douche here, but just a hint. Zooming in doesnt affect your depth of field, but magnification does. If you frame something exactly the same way with a 35mm f/2.8 lens compared to a 300mm f/2.8 lens the dof is similiar. Of course the picture might look somewhat different because of the field of view, but im just talking about pure bokeh-licious backgrounds ;-)
laxativee 8 months ago
@laxativee Don't know about you, but zooming in definitely affects the depth-of-field on my camera anyway. As I say, if I stand back away from the subject and zoom in, anything behind or in front of the subject becomes out of focus. That's shallow depth-of-field, or shallow focus, isn't it? And if I don't zoom in then everything remains in focus, which is deep focus. Hence, zooming in affects depth-of-field. If I zoom in, the depth-of-field is affected.
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews To make it a bit more clear. If you are not moving forwards or backwards and only zoom on your subject - thus framing your subject tighter - the depth of field will be and appear to be very much thinner, but as i said, if you use the same framing, your focal length is not going to affect your depth of field. Only your aperture and the size of your sensor (which actually only changes the magnification too).
laxativee 8 months ago
@laxativee And to make it a bit more clear to you. If I wish to achieve shallow depth-of-field with my Sony DSR 200 video camera and the one built in lens that it has, I zoom in on the subject and stand back further. If I don't zoom in and obtain the same framing then the depth-of-field is not shallow and everything is in focus. Zooming in DOES affect the depth-of-field. This is simply a fact that I could demonstrate easily enough.
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews Wrong.
laxativee 8 months ago
@laxativee No, you are wrong. Here's one paragraph copied and pasted from an article on the subject, and there's many more: The "trick" is to let the camera focus in macro mode while you're optically zoomed all the way in. "Tighter zoom is shallower DOF" and Macro Reduces the DOF even more.
Note the part about the zoom affecting the DOF? Sorry but I think perhaps you should teach yourself a little more before you attempt to teach other people. Stop being a douche ;)
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@laxativee And another one: ZOOM! Set your camera on full zoom – but NOT digital zoom. If you don’t know the difference, look at the little bar that comes up when you zoom. There will be a line or a marker where it crosses into ‘digital zoom’. NEVER use digital zoom, it’s just cropping your pic in the camera, you can do that later. So zoom in as far as you can. Yes, this will mean you have to back up across the room to get everything you want in frame, but it makes a difference. Want more?
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews What if i just happen to own fixed focal length lenses? My 5D2 doesn't even have a digital zoom. Odd for you to attack me like that. I know what i'm talking about and my point stays. Hack, i wouldn't be shooting professionally if i didn't know even the basics about lenses and depth of field. If you frame a subject the same way (ie same magnification) the only thing that affects your depth of field is your aperture. It doesn't matter what focal length you are shooting with.
laxativee 8 months ago
@laxativee What do you mean attack you? You started by telling me that zooming in doesn't affect depth-of-field, and I told you that it does and provided evidence to support my claim. Zooming in DOES affect depth-of-field. Jeez, I've copied and pasted from articles on photography that explain that zooming in affects depth-of-field. You need to research this fact because you have obviously overlooked it. And by the way, I have a professional qualification in photography myself.
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@laxativee Ah I see what has happened here. Don't worry, my comment that starts "Zoom! Set your camera on full zoom..." was just copied and pasted from an article that explains how to achieve shallow depth-of-field by zoomin in. It appears that I was telling you to "Zoom!" but don't worry, I wasn't. It wasn't an attack. That whole comment was copied and pasted, apart from the last two words asking if you wanted more evidence. Trust me, DOF is affected by zooming in with an optical zoom. Friends?
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews I'm starting to get annoying, i'm sure, but zooming in really doesn't change depth of field. It just makes the depth of field appear to be smaller, because of the magnification and field of view. It's explained pretty well in the article i hinted you to look at. No harm done though. I'm just not giving up ;)
laxativee 8 months ago
@laxativee Mate, try to listen, I copied and pasted from two photography articles that actually state in words that zooming in obtains shallower depth-of-field. Here is one again:
"Tighter zoom is shallower DOF."
Can you understand those words? They don't say "Tighter zoom makes the DOF appear shallower", they say "Tighter zoom IS shallower DOF". Plain and simple. And I know that it is true because I've done it! You may not if you don't even have a zoom. You need to learn more.
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@laxativee Depth-Of-Field is just the distance between the nearest and furthest objects in a scene that appear in focus. If I place two objects on my coffee table a foot apart and film them whilst zoomed out, they both appear in focus. But if I zoom in with my optical zoom and then stand back to obtain the same framing, only one of the objects will be in focus. This is shallow focus. Would you like to wager a bet on this? Because I can film this (with two cameras) to prove it right now.
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews You need to learn the difference of what IS a short depth of field compared to what APPEARS to be short depth of field. It's all just about field of view and magnification fooling you to think that the depth of field is smaller. Go ahead, measure the circle of confusion with a depth of field calculator. You wont find a difference between a 300/2.8 lens compared to a 35/2.8 lens when shooting with the same magnification and aperture.
laxativee 8 months ago
@laxativee This is copied and pasted from the web definition of Depth-Of-Field: "In optics, particularly as it relates to film and photography, depth of field (DOF) is the distance between the nearest and farthest objects in a scene that appear acceptably sharp in an image." Now, as I have repeatedly explained, zooming in with an optical zoom will shorten the distance needed between two objects to obtain shallow DOF. One object WILL be out of focus. An object cannot SEEM to be out of focus!
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@laxativee Now I've repeatedly proven my case by copying and pasting from articles on the subject. The last comment I made simply cannot be argued. It's PROOF that what I say is correct. It is a simple fact that you need to accept. You obviously have a problem in accepting things. Now, I'll ask you one last time, do you want to put money on it because if you do then I'll make a video that will PROVE my case right here and now. Otherwise, go and do some more research, you're getting on my nerves.
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@laxativee Do you even know that if you zoom in with an optical zoom that nearby objects that were originally in focus will become blurry? That IS shallow DOF. Is this something you have even tried? Or are you arguing about something that you haven't even tried yourself? Do yourself a favour, type in something like "Shallow focus by zooming in" and actually try to learn about it instead of remaining so incorrigible. Get yourself a camera with optical focus and try it out so that you know.
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews I've tested it out with several optics and yes, im willing to bet money on it. I'm 100% positive that zooming in ie the focal length doesn't affect depth of field but just makes a background appear more blurred because of the field of view ie what some people call telephoto "compression". If you actually went out and tested it out you'd notice that the circle of confusion will be identical with a photo framed the same way, regardless of the focal length.
laxativee 8 months ago
@laxativee If the background appears more blurred after zooming in, as you say, then that IS shallower depth-of-field than before zooming in. How can it be anything else? I want you to copy and paste the definition of the term "Depth-Of-Field" from a web article, just so that we both know the meaning of the term. Can you do that please? Just search "Depth-Of-Field" and copy and paste from the article ok. Thanks.
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews Read the article i posted. Everything is explained there.
laxativee 8 months ago
@laxativee No, no, for the purpose of this argument and so that it's on record here for both of us to see, copy and paste the meaning of the term "Depth-Of-Field" please. What's the matter? Don't you want to? I wonder why?
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews So you want me to take a snip out of an article just to provide you with a quote that loosely might be understood as if your point of view is the correct one. It's optics, it can't be quoted in one sentence like it's done on super ultra pro digital photography magazine 5000.
laxativee 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews Put it simply. Depth of field is the area in focus ie the area with an acceptable circle of confusion. Zooming in doesnt change circle of confusion thus not affecting depth of field even if it looks like it because of the magnification and field of view. Things will APPERAR more blurred because they are viewed LARGER due to the smaller FIELD OF VIEW. I know its a pain to get, but it's also the truth.
laxativee 8 months ago
@laxativee So Depth-Of-Field is "The area in focus" - your words. And zooming in with an optical zoom ALTERS the "area in focus". It doesn't APPEAR to alter the area in focus - it actually ALTERS the "area in focus". If I don't zoom in, two objects a foot apart will BOTH be in focus - if I zoom in, one object will be in focus and one will be "out of focus". Can you understand this simple English? Or do you have a problem with English comprehension? I'm going to swear at you soon.
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews No. Depth of field is not the area in focus. Depth of field is the area where circle of confusion is acceptable. The area in focus is much smaller. See, if you print a photo compared to a web sized 800x533 photo the printed one will appear to have a bigger depth of field due to the fact that its more magnified. Same thing with zooming occurs.
laxativee 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@laxativee "Depth of field is the area in focus..."
"No. Depth of field is not the area in focus"
Both are YOUR WORDS.
"Things will APPERAR more blurred" An object cannot "APPEAR" to be blurred. It is either blurred or it is not blurred. That's a fact. You sir are an idiot.
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@laxativee Are you trying to tell me that an object that appears blurred is actually in sharp focus! Hahahahaha - you need help! XD
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews Out of arguments i see.
laxativee 8 months ago
@laxativee Not quite. I asked you a question. Are you trying to tell me that an object that appears blurred is actually in sharp focus? Because that is what your comment implies. Can you answer that question whilst I wait for my Depth-Of-Field Demo that proves you are wrong to upload?
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@laxativee Right, my video proof is uploaded now. The title is Depth Of Field Demo Using Optical Zoom On A Sony DSR 200 Camcorder. You'll find it on my channel. The video shows two tins of food. By zooming in I am able to throw one of the tins out of focus. This means that the act of zooming in affected the DOF, because that's what DOF is. There's no two ways about it. I know you won't admit it though because you are a douche.
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews After all, we'd all hate to disagree with the undisputed leader in the optics industry, Carl Zeiss? My point it clearly staten and proved in the following document. Taking all your information from a 5 buck photography related magazine wont get you far in the world of physics.
bit.ly 997MlZ
laxativee 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews I found a good article every photographer seriously wanting to know something about depth of field and also controlling it. Maybe you'll read it a few times and then try out yourself.
Google it up. Depth of Field and One of the Greatest Illusions of All Time! by Walter Graff
laxativee 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i wanna bang her
MrPapawill 10 months ago
@cheetodude24 i do believe that distance among simply semi expert and professional is little now. d7000 is all everyone need. check out... freedslr . c0m change 0 with o and get a way to bring home completely new Nikon D7000
maevetaylorkx 10 months ago
Goddess !
AlanPanczakMOVIE 10 months ago
she looks really scared at the beginning.
Sieist23Jahrealt 10 months ago
Epitome of hometown hottie.
I <3 America.
MJthegoat 10 months ago
@MJthegoat
That's the only place they exist. Wait...
XiaoPow 10 months ago
Her eyes are totally dilated! Nice Birthday...
LifeDigitized 10 months ago
The problem with this is that the 5D is SO damn good, and the lighting on this just happen to be SO damn good... I wanna know what happens next; I wanna see them run out for those "much needed supplies."
destroyer8000 11 months ago
The problem with this camera is that it only works with beautiful women.
watchyourvideo 11 months ago 66
@watchyourvideo No, it's a magical camera. Every woman appears beautiful using this camera. In real life she's all snaggle toothed, and frizzy haired.
Nomoreidsleft 8 months ago 11
you fall in love, you loose! And i just lost.... :(
adomolis 1 year ago
some of you guys really need to get out more. she's beautiful with, what we could see from 30 seconds, has a good spirit, but there are plenty of fish in the sea that are just as beautiful with the same kind presence. nice clip regardless.
djkross123 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
watch?v=d7uQHvqr6k0 This professional music video clip made with 5d mark ii in January 2011. Director: Altan Dönmez
greentree445 1 year ago
Fun clip. She has a great spirit. I just did a tutorial on 5D Mark II filmmaking (gear and techniques). Check'em if you would... Cheers. -Demi
DemiTheCameraMan 1 year ago
I love this camera, I need one
COWGirlGAMER 1 year ago
@COWGirlGAMER I love this camera and this girl, I need one of each. ;)
pmgurjar 10 months ago
i love it when she says coffee .. aweeeeeeeee the lil smile
haaristwof 1 year ago
Comment removed
invisibleTricker 1 year ago
(O_O) she is so beautiful.. oh well, i can't marry her.. but a kiss from her will do =) that would be awesome. =)
kanocularTV 1 year ago 24
a....mazing
romsprod 1 year ago
some woman have sex appeal some don't...she does
URIBENFILM 1 year ago 5
Maybe all YouTube videos will look this good in 10 years? =P
DeathToTheseWalls 1 year ago
how does she look without that beast camera? :D
eddy1337 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
1st omg she very pretty wanna move to America so i can meet her and marry her 2nd the quality is phenomenal nice vid/camera/lens/and girl
jackwenman777 1 year ago
1st omg she very pretty wanna move to America so i can meet her and marry her 2nd the quality is phenomenal nice vid/camera/lens/and girls
jackwenman777 1 year ago
This is the first video i see in 5d! and i make me crazy!!!!!!!!!!!
adarleatomosvideos 1 year ago
I can't believe that this is 'raw' footage.
slaQ83 1 year ago
Comment removed
dimasound 1 year ago
looks like this nice girl is very good person, would be great to met her
(btw - the camera is excellent choice! )
dimasound 1 year ago
Don't know why, but it reminds me Cloverfield.
MEM90s 1 year ago
Most beautiful girl ive ever seen. Is she single? haha
alexdarkjedi 1 year ago
cute...
andreyborul 1 year ago
schwing
BlackSupraC2 1 year ago
Well, I now know what my motivation to go to the gym is
asplashofcitrus 1 year ago 4
she talks just like hayley from american dad
asigravitate27 1 year ago
@asigravitate27 Wow. So right.
Glupipi 1 year ago
extremely extremely beautiful.
juan69ing 1 year ago
She seems to be a very nice person :)
DerKaiii 1 year ago 2
hahaha dude theyre sooo dilated even with the light right in her eye, shes rolling or trippin her ass off and she just got a canon 5d lucky bastard
zacsystm5 1 year ago
oh, my god! I'm in love! Where's is this girl?
BaaderMeinhof77 1 year ago
Love this video. Thought it was some kind of art house flick for the first 3 seconds.
hazymat 1 year ago
your 25th documentary, i hope its not your last cuty :)i prefere here then the camera :)
MarkNetherlands1 1 year ago
wow....the video is just... beautifull, yes, thats the word, beautifull
enriqueuret 1 year ago
i tried to record on the same level but somehow the quality of mine is some kind of noise (y). whats the problem? what is the 30p mode and where can i change it.
my preference 24-70mm f2.8 iso 6400 full hd with a compactflash card with 30mb transferrate
vocatvie 1 year ago
Comment removed
vocatvie 1 year ago
@r0nej00 as I have not videoed straight for over 30 minutes I cannot comment further, but as I said that is in the manual. For overheating as a problem..... I don't think that would be a problem for me as I video at present in night temperatures from 2' C to 12' C so maybe it would do a auto-cool....
orgasmictomato 1 year ago
@r0nej00 Thanks for the reassuring information, I just didn't want to invest in something that would be old technology when I got it. But now I know thanks again!
007Fortis 1 year ago
Is this camera still a good camera (considering its two years old) or is there a new one like the 5D M2 on its way
007Fortis 1 year ago
is it albe to focus automatically?
ShynePoe33 1 year ago
lol she's on XTC
yopoiz 1 year ago
what does she say in the end? "its my 25th documentary?" ..wot?? :\
eladbari 1 year ago
beautiful woman :)
yonkisalpoder 1 year ago
Is she on facebook? O_O
AtheistGeek 1 year ago 2
hi, i was wondering if you could quickly tell me something.
i wanted to get a canon 500D or 50D, because the 5D was too expensive. i wanted it primarily for video, but i recently found out that the 500D and 50D dont record audio and they dont actually record video unless the camera is plugged into the computer via USB. my question is; clearly the 5D has audio recording aswell, but does it actually have a video function? or does it too have to be plugged in to the computer in order to record?thnx
thomasgoodin 1 year ago
@thomasgoodin Hi, was just watching this clip and saw your question, not my business, but as no-one had answered you.... yes it does have video capabilities and with fast card can run a 30 minute clip without any problem and more if needed.
I have a 5D Mk II and am still learning about it's function settings.
Jim
orgasmictomato 1 year ago
this reminds me 'cloverfield,' one of the best movie for me.
Watching this video like all night, now I should go to bed.
gunnhgt 1 year ago 3
@gunnhgt I was thinking the SAME EXACT thing. lol
SBVmuskees 1 year ago
wow,
i thought it was some movie or like that!
man she is beautiful lol
I like the ambience of this clip!
gunnhgt 1 year ago
That's like better than my eyes!
DavithRedway 1 year ago 2
happy birthday. you're hot.
fenderplayer61 1 year ago 3
She is one of the most beautiful women I have ever seen in my life.
LJGB1 1 year ago 58
@LJGB1 You Must Not Get Out Much Huuh?
scabobble 1 year ago 3
50482 views and no comments...come on
kamranhaneef 1 year ago
awesome quality
fdrpyahoocom 1 year ago
i see problem with focusing
superfrog1977 1 year ago
how do you manage focusing? I can see that it could be little tricky here and there ...
superfrog1977 1 year ago
wow this video is amazingly clear!!!! i sO want the 5D but cOst sO much.. i think ill just have to settle with the 7D.. $1000 difference is kinda alot of money :( but man! everytime i watch a 5D Mark ii video compared to the 7D i just think twice again
j051885 1 year ago
@j051885 I feel just the same way... I think I'll keep on saving to get the 5d.
BR177 1 year ago
is it autofocus when you recording audio also?
xxttaass 1 year ago
no one seems to have the answer, want to convert HD from my t1i canon camera into a dvd
farstarfilms 1 year ago
@farstarfilms Use Compressor in FCP studio.
unixsuperuser 1 year ago
@unixsuperuser thanks for info are there any online downloads?
farstarfilms 1 year ago
awesome lens!
bloodbrush89 1 year ago
i wanna marry her
alexdarkjedi 1 year ago 121
@alexdarkjedi 34 persons wanna marry her !!!??....lol
BlackTwister999 1 year ago 3
@alexdarkjedi Don't we all...
DirtyJewbz 1 year ago
@alexdarkjedi 121 people wanna marry her?!??! I'm sure there must be a woman in those 121 xD
alexdarkjedi 5 months ago
Hot.
bradjacob 1 year ago 4
Pretty lady
drbubble33 1 year ago 4
she's beautiful.....
frilink 1 year ago
She is squint.
brunfloyd 2 years ago
Did you use the built in or external mic? If so, which one? Sounds good!
bradbeckett 2 years ago 2
Thanks for shooting without all the bells and whistles, because that's what I've been waiting to see. You know just how it would look just shooting straight out of the package. Looks great!!
rashb 2 years ago
nice girl )) nice Mark II ;-P
SazonPRO 2 years ago 3
haha I was wondering what kind of hd cameras were available, and the canon 4d mark 2 impressed me the most so i decided to search it on youtube and i clicked on this vid....the funny part is that you have videos of me.....i march blue devils snareline.
kmtobia 2 years ago
she's pretty :)
jakradum 2 years ago
was this a piece of unseen footage fom the film 'Cloverfield'? lol
XysteRST205 2 years ago
NO WAY! I was just about to say the same thing, then I saw your comment!
-It's not from cloverfield btw
blosmovideos 2 years ago
i never saw beautiful camera like that .. :O
Bylochino 2 years ago 3
Gorgeous camera, nice girl too.
onjoFilms 2 years ago
wow! she is so beutiful.
AlonYehudaAbraham 2 years ago
she kind of looks like Haley the lead singer from Paramore. =D
romodrummerjz 2 years ago
no.
XiaoPow 2 years ago
whats the maximum minutes/hours that you film with this camera
romodrummerjz 2 years ago
12 mins i believe
TuamLis 2 years ago
@TuamLis not exactly correct, it shoots 12 minutes with a 4GB card but if you have say 32GB it shoots 30 mins stops, then 30 mins, etc. til the card is full.
Jim
orgasmictomato 1 year ago
... fav? FAAAAAAV!
mendebil 2 years ago
Gawds sake man focus the camera!!!
chaucer44 2 years ago
She is beutyfull and im talking about the girl not the cam! :P
FedeXP 2 years ago 5
so this camera DOES record audio? I hadn't seen any mention of it on the internet and was one of the reason I didn't want to buy it.
jmclane 2 years ago
Lemme get this sraight; you're taking the native h.264 MOV files from the 5D Mark II and rendering them out as a Sony MainConcept AVC/AAC .mp4 file.
So whaddaya need Quicktime for???
Thank You!
JimboWHO 2 years ago
pretty!
andjoy 2 years ago
holy FUCK BALLS. This camera fucking blows my shit every time I see a video. Like what the FUCK. Honestly. It turns any lighting into like, the PERFECT scenario.. I MUST HAVE THIS CAMERA!!! OMG!! O_O
jellotime91 2 years ago 3