@milivela5 wtf does that even mean, a giant footprint doesnt prove god exists, if anything it disproves the bible and backs up athiests because of the age of the footprint
out of the the billions of years of evolution on this planet.....how is it not possible for giants to have been here? Visited...checked things out....realized at that time the plant may not have been habitable...and then left.....it is reasonable to think such a think could have happened....
After careful examination, I have determined that this giant had only one leg and was navigating a partly cooled lava field. Imagine something the size of a sperm whale hoping on one foot. The foot broke the crust resulting in one giant hot foot impression. He then rolled down the hill, screaming in agony into a now prehistoric lake and drowned. Soon after the nearby volcano expelled millions of tonnes of ash and mud burying the footprint. Eventually, the earth thrusted the print out again.
God I just read the tags, and what ??? "Astronomy", "Geology" ?! How dare you talk about REAL science on such a moron-trap video ??? And "Summerians" ?? They are real !!! GIANTS ARE NOT !!!
Oh please. Why only one? Where is the other foot? Why have no skeletons been found? 200 million years ago? Humans were still half monkeys 4 million years ago.
@BrooklynBhoy There have been giant skeletons found. The question you should be asking is why "science" has hidden them. The Rockefeller name also surfaces which shouldn't be a surprise to people that fully understand the game being played.
@BrooklynBhoy Skeletal remains after 200 million years? "Oh please". Who knows what might have happened to the other footprint. They were probably separated by several yards to begin with.
If you want to believe that your ancestors were apes, go for it. I'm still waiting for explanations as to why so many species that also supposedly evolved with us are not intelligent, too. Cockroaches have been around longer than man, so shouldn't they be far ahead of humans?
@tomperanteau Please. Read The Origins of Species. Do you really think that EVERY specie on Earth should have evolved the same way ? "Oh please". Cockroaches are insects. Not mammals like the apes. If they would have evolved to be more intelligent than men, they should have grown waaaaay bigger than their normal size. And since we all know that they would crumble under their own wheigt ! Just like giant spiders.
@YannisMk Because you need to be spoon-fed your ideas as opposed to researching things on your own, does't mean everyone else does. You're only 13. I prefer to research and think for myself. If you need to read what someone else says, instead of thinking on your own, go for it.
So, tell us all what you base your assertion on that only mammals should have evolved. If, as evolutionists think, we came from the ocean, then we once had gills. Fish aren't mammals.
@tomperanteau You say you think for yourself and research. I don't call a Youtube search "researching". What I call reasearching is thinking BY YOURSELF, which you obviously did not do. YOU are the one spoon-fed.. by Youtube users like the one who posted this vide. Have you seen his other videos ? One of them is "Secret Numbers of GOD" ! How can you believe this ? God has telephone ? I believe you are a Creationist. And you say think for yourself ?
@YannisMk Out of letters again, sorry. --You see, millions of years ago, mammals did not exist ; but then after millions of years of evolution, some little rodents developped something called the placenta. You may know that the placent is what every mammal on Earth has, and that it is in this organ that the baby developps itself. You are a mammal. You became a feotus in the placenta.
You talked about cockroaches, not about reptilians or about aquatic creatures. Read the comment again.
@YannisMk You're 13. You have no idea what you're talking about and have misinterpreted what you've read. I don't watch media, but as a small child, you might not think to ask before you assume. Come back when you grow up and we'll chat.
@tomperanteau not everything that lives in the ocean had gills, theres plenty of mammals living in the ocean without gills and plenty of other creatures like cepholapods, sea horses, mollusks, lobsters and plenty of others that live underwater without gills, gills are just one way of drawing oxygen out of water, our ancestors werent fish at somepoint however if you go back farther fish and mammals will have evolved from the same ancestor at some point.
The problem I have with this is first it's claimed to be a footprint in granite and then it's described as a footprint in mud. Well it can't be both, so which is it?
Ever hear of a Sandblaster? They can most certainly make a precision footprint cut such as this one into the stone. This archaeology uncovering giants seems pure hogwash, it's just not enough evidence that this was in fact NOT sandblasted in. You may now flame away! xD
@Indigovioletfilms Well you strike a good point. I want to believe it is all true because it's fascinating but there are far too many conspiracies to not reconsider.
@Xp3ktus It is wise not believe everything we see on youtube. Healthy skepticism is good, but its also good to keep an open mind. Even if they had sandblasting techniques why would anyone perpetrate a hoax in a place where there was virtually no chance of anyone ever seeing it. Most perps want some ego gratification for their efforts and that would be unlikely here. Records of ancient cultures also assert there were giants in the past. This warrants further investigation at least.
@YannisMk Do you really think one of the first things that would have been accomplished with the brand new primitive blasting that existed in 1870 would have been to drag it to a remote area in South Africa up a hill to form a footprint in solid rock? If it was even possible the time and expense involved would have been extreme. And the result? Form a footprint that would not be widely known about for over 100 years? What you are suggesting is illogical. This is real and hidden by "science".
@Meathead36 Hey, make up your mind... The guy said "Hmmm. It was first discovered in 1912, I believe. Did they have sandblaster in the remote regions of Africa then?". We are talking about 42 years later !! LEARN YOUR MATHS, MEAT HEAD !!!!
@YannisMk Was it portable? Hard to imagine what would motivate someone to lug sandblasting equipment and machete their way through miles of uncharted jungle just to do this in a place no one ever goes..
3:36 It is not impossible to have a shape like that.. It could be very unlikely but nevertheles it could happen in billions of year! Think: a giant (human or not) fell in to that mud and died, fossilized! Then the cataclism! pulled the fossilized giant above the ground level into the lava! BINGO!
Maybe a being of such a nature could walk on lava without being burned. I have seen videos of people walking on hot coals without being burned so.....
all religions, old drawing, cultures etc from all over the world are in fact telling the story from the giants, 2brothers fighting and a Godly son born from a earth woman and a god like creature...mmm?funny hey?
That footprint is a Nephilum. they were trying to find higher ground when God brought the Great Deluge to kill them. The Giant was trying to escape by crawling up this cliff, but it did him no good cause the flood eventually overwhelmed him.
At Glozel, France human hand prints were found in ancient clay blocks. They are HUGE hands. They measure 25 cm to 35 cm long and up to 22 cm across the palms, and could only have been made by humans between 2 and 4 METERS high.
The museum of Glozel has these hand prints on display. Also very "robust" bones were found at the site including parts of a skull "twice as thick as normal."
Other giants have been found in ancient sites in France: Castelnau for example.
@rephaim23 These unbelieving fools will never believe, till they see Jesus Christ coming in the clouds with His Holy Angels to judge the earth. But it will be too late for them by that time.
Well, I encourage skepticism, I mean I suspect the rock formation here could be natural but have been indented on the toes. Or maybe it is genuine. It's certainly interesting. I'd like to see it examined by geologists, and anthropologists.
If a series of several tracks can be found, then this could be genuine. For every hoax or natural explanation there might be a real one out there. The world still has lots of mysteries, in fact 86% of the world's living species are estimate to be either poorly studied or not even identified by science yet, according to a National Geographic story I read last year. That says it all.
@TaigaSibirskaya hey, check out how the stone blocks are set in peru. some temples in egypt are also done in a similar manner. it is as though they were molded to fit perfectly together or were set on top of one-another while still in a malleable state, kind of like clay
smithsonian scumbags should arrive soon and wisk it away to never be seen again. remember they gotta put the lie out there we are evolved stupid apes...ooga booga
To me this means giants of old knew how to dissolve stone; similar to the giants of South America. Problem is if giants knew how to dissolve stone, then dating stone almost impossible. Of course, stupid people could say you can't dissolve stone, but then that's why they're stupid people.
A closer reference is the Bible.Trouble is whoever designed us, did it in such a way, no matter what type of humanoid we came in contact with -we'll assimilate them genetically. Brilliant design you must say.
@lourensdebeer2000 if you dont get why not then theres no discussing with you. anyone who believes this must also believe in fairies and goblins. wow...just wow...if youre a little kid i might see why but if youre an adult!?!?!?! im speechless
@xamot27 so you are one of those people who say - your way is the only way! I someone does'net believe in the way you think then they are children. I remember when I was in primary school how little kids when they could not have things their way! - starter screaming and crying, - sound familiar? It doesn't mean to believe in the history of the old scriptures and that a few giants (gods - remember Greek etc legends?) walked the earth on believe in fairies and goblins and than one is a child!
@lourensdebeer2000 im not saying my way is the only way. the implications of your claim ( there being giants ) would have to have collateral evidence. i.e. way more footprints, way more bones (more than NONE) why is there only one here? why is it vertical? wheres all the dwellings these giants would have lived in? would all the animals be relative in size or not?
@xamot27 all are legitimate questions. How many dinosaur bones and skeletons have they found in comparison with the millions of them that must be out there? If one take the history in the old scriptures to heart, there couldn't have been many giants - so what would the chances of finding remaining bones and skeletons be - very slim I imagine. There are many reasons for it to be vertical. Tell me - do you believe earth to be the only inhabited planet in the universe?
Maybe it was running from the flood? It could have been half cooled. Still would have seared the skin right off, but if your running for your life....... The best argument from Ian Juby is NOT that it ISN'T a footprint, but that it cannot be concluded as one with only ONE footprint to go off of. Typically something walking will leave more than one, and without at least a pair, you can't really come to a conclusion.
Not to debunk giants, but no living being is going to leave a footprint in lava (the precursor to granite) and live. This might be believable if the rock was sedimentary. Even if a giant accidentally stepped into a puddle of molten rock, the heat would deform the impression into something more skeletal than fleshy. This is just a unique and coincidental erosive action and the claim is bovine excrement!
Looks to me like those "stones" are actually poured cement probably from 10-20 K yrs ago. Notice the different sizes and outlines of each stone, just like in all the ancient temples to make them earthquake proof. Either that or they cut these rocks to make this "structure" with the footprint in it already. Very Interesting, when will people wake up to what all is being hidden from us, namely our past and anything to do with other types/forms of life/man.
Looks good. But so do those threes that look like boobs. There are things out there that are going to look like something. When you think logically about this, what the giant walked up the rock?? It kicked the rock?? The rock was once mud and changed to stone?? So wouldn't there be more foot prints like this all over that area?
Couldn't it be possible that it just LOOKS like a footprint but isn't an actual footprint..... ? Jesus! If you spent your time spreading the truth, instead of this stupidity, the world would be a much better place.
@marlene1374 If the unwilling to believe would just examine the evidence with an open mind. But I suppose the critical part of this is having an open mind.
@marlene1374 I'm a total follower of YaHSHuaH the Christ and I can tel you that that footprint is real. I stay 75km from that footprint and saw it the first time as a 4year old child (50years ago) when almost nobody knew about it. Step into stiff mud and it makes a identical same form.
It seems like some "Christians" haven't read the book Genesis in the Bible. That giants walked the earth, because of what the fallen angels have done!
@lourensdebeer2000 I've read Genesis.It's a fairytale What do you think of the part in which the men from Sodom want Lot to send the 2 males out so they can screw them in the ass? Hilarious! This video is bullshit for idiots. That rock was carved out by stones being pushed around by high fast water after storms. That rock was once part of an ancient creek bed. I know where there is a mountain stream bed that has many similar examples of this type of rock wear.
@bucksmasher1 obviously there are millions of people that are not open minded. Yes it could have been water carving it over millions of years. If you see it up close and know how stiff mud forms when stepped on - one would see the amazing similarities.
And Genesis - surprisingly more than a fairy tale. One can just look around in this day and age and see how barbaric and stupid the human race can react - and especially in time of stress and war to try and same there own skin!
@lourensdebeer2000 I forgot to say that the 2 males in the Genesis story were angels so it is nothing but a fairytale.. We adults know that there are NO angels,devils,sugar-plum fairies,demons,jinns,witches or Big Foot. Humans have gotten bigger not smaller. There were never giant people.
@bucksmasher1 - I know they angels - doesn't that say something to you? And a hunter call himself an adult - well that is one way of seeing things.
I would love to take this "religion" thing further with you, but we cannot here as this post is about a "footprint" in the rock. Maybe if you could suggest another forum or want to e-mail me.
Thank you for the follow-up Michael. Fascinating. Looking forward to confirmation by geologists and perhaps a doctor with forensic expertise. Namaste.
Hey Michael, dismiss all the inevitable skeptics, but instead, work on that 'beer belly' of yours~ that which, if I remember correctly, wasn't there a mere year ago. Travelling has it's big DISadvantages, as is evident with our dearest David Icke too~it's ALL due to take aways, restaurant, hotel etc. meals & MAYBE in your instance, too many BRAAIS!!! Beware, & try to go the blended fruit & vegetable route instead. We want YOU around longest!
You are far & away the most exciting guy in the field MT. Really you have hit the "TRUTH". Hope you don't get hurt my friend as this data blows away the crap that has been heaped on the truth of humans. BTW do you know GINGER BAKER (ex-client i'm a talent rep) he's living in SA married a local girl. lol. Again you are the truth sir. robbie 'bob" robinson
Strange that it is sideways.. only thing i could think of is if it was a footprint and not a natural phenomenon then maybe the crust had shifted during a pole shift or major earthquake and thus the granite tilted and rose away from the earth (rather than being buried over the millenia) what do you think?
Let's just say that a real giant did this and it wasn't a carving. The foot narrows out toward the heel, while running, when creating prints (with ink, mud, etc.). This is because, when you walk, more weight is distributed across your feet but, when you run, less weight is distributed as you spring (run) across the ground. So, if this was a real, living giant then it would be possible for the arch of the foot to oddly narrow down to the heel. Thanks for posting this video!
@007jjb ~ TRUE! And they STILL exist today! They are called AGARTHANS (I think) & live in Inner & Hollow Earth. The dude who visited them with his Dad in a tiny sail boat up around Scandinavia told the most amazing story, which totally resonated with me, yet the poor guy spent most of his life thereafter in prison, having been deemed insane & dishonest etc. How absolutely tragic, when he was simply sharing the absolute TRUTH ~ that which the ILLUMINATI have attempted to deny ALL of us for eons!
@neutrino422 I seriously doubt it was done as when the surface was granite, in his earlier video, he surmised it was done in mud, and through 'aeons'/millions of years, somehow this mud compounded into Granite. I wish they would do close ups on the coins. as I would hope this isn't a stage/set-up. I wish there was encryptedGPS/EXIF/data in these videos for location.
@intermatrixnaut1 Granite is created by incredible forces of pressure. There's no way a foot print would survive the pressure. It looks old so there are two possible explanations. It is either a very strange natural occurance or the laws of physics were different at that time.
Wow! Thank you and all who are helping with this fascinating area. My first thought was hate to run into the one who made that print!! Is there other prints around that one?
Hello Micheal, thank you for sharing this with us. Is there a possibility to upload shoot the video again but than in Wide Screen and in Full HD or at least in HD Ready format. I want to put this video on my Nokia N8 and show it to my colleagues. I follow the Ancient Alien theory for years now (I started when I was 14 years old or 15) and it looks to me that a lot of loose puzzles are falling together to create one explanation. Again thanks for the upload.
Your right Michael it would make a good tourist attraction .
gizwat 2 days ago
what the atheist are going to say now????????
milivela5 4 days ago
@milivela5 wtf does that even mean, a giant footprint doesnt prove god exists, if anything it disproves the bible and backs up athiests because of the age of the footprint
fishboy1111111 3 days ago 2
@fishboy1111111 where does the bible state the age of the earth?
ThisFish888 2 days ago
out of the the billions of years of evolution on this planet.....how is it not possible for giants to have been here? Visited...checked things out....realized at that time the plant may not have been habitable...and then left.....it is reasonable to think such a think could have happened....
KyaniDave 4 days ago
After careful examination, I have determined that this giant had only one leg and was navigating a partly cooled lava field. Imagine something the size of a sperm whale hoping on one foot. The foot broke the crust resulting in one giant hot foot impression. He then rolled down the hill, screaming in agony into a now prehistoric lake and drowned. Soon after the nearby volcano expelled millions of tonnes of ash and mud burying the footprint. Eventually, the earth thrusted the print out again.
Indigovioletfilms 4 days ago
i do believe i heard credo mutwa tell about this micheal!
jay7920 5 days ago in playlist Uploaded videos
God I just read the tags, and what ??? "Astronomy", "Geology" ?! How dare you talk about REAL science on such a moron-trap video ??? And "Summerians" ?? They are real !!! GIANTS ARE NOT !!!
YannisMk 6 days ago
Wonder what he could Bench Press :P
FlashFlashman1 1 week ago
Many Darwinists on suicide watch after this one.
Meathead36 1 week ago
I just imagine how huge his dick was :PP
Elorx 1 week ago
Klaus Donna must have flat feet to question the shape of what looks to be a healthy arch, either that or the giant had bunions?
tubeyerself 1 week ago in playlist Liked videos
Oh please. Why only one? Where is the other foot? Why have no skeletons been found? 200 million years ago? Humans were still half monkeys 4 million years ago.
BrooklynBhoy 2 weeks ago
@BrooklynBhoy There have been giant skeletons found. The question you should be asking is why "science" has hidden them. The Rockefeller name also surfaces which shouldn't be a surprise to people that fully understand the game being played.
Meathead36 1 week ago
@BrooklynBhoy Skeletal remains after 200 million years? "Oh please". Who knows what might have happened to the other footprint. They were probably separated by several yards to begin with.
If you want to believe that your ancestors were apes, go for it. I'm still waiting for explanations as to why so many species that also supposedly evolved with us are not intelligent, too. Cockroaches have been around longer than man, so shouldn't they be far ahead of humans?
tomperanteau 1 week ago
@tomperanteau Please. Read The Origins of Species. Do you really think that EVERY specie on Earth should have evolved the same way ? "Oh please". Cockroaches are insects. Not mammals like the apes. If they would have evolved to be more intelligent than men, they should have grown waaaaay bigger than their normal size. And since we all know that they would crumble under their own wheigt ! Just like giant spiders.
Now CQFD, comme on dit en France.
YannisMk 6 days ago
@YannisMk Because you need to be spoon-fed your ideas as opposed to researching things on your own, does't mean everyone else does. You're only 13. I prefer to research and think for myself. If you need to read what someone else says, instead of thinking on your own, go for it.
So, tell us all what you base your assertion on that only mammals should have evolved. If, as evolutionists think, we came from the ocean, then we once had gills. Fish aren't mammals.
Try to reason for yourself.
tomperanteau 6 days ago
@tomperanteau You say you think for yourself and research. I don't call a Youtube search "researching". What I call reasearching is thinking BY YOURSELF, which you obviously did not do. YOU are the one spoon-fed.. by Youtube users like the one who posted this vide. Have you seen his other videos ? One of them is "Secret Numbers of GOD" ! How can you believe this ? God has telephone ? I believe you are a Creationist. And you say think for yourself ?
YannisMk 5 days ago
@YannisMk Sorry, I was out of letters. Also, it looks like a 13 years old boy is less influenced by the medias and by legends than you are.
I did not say only mammals could evolve.
YannisMk 5 days ago
@YannisMk Out of letters again, sorry. --You see, millions of years ago, mammals did not exist ; but then after millions of years of evolution, some little rodents developped something called the placenta. You may know that the placent is what every mammal on Earth has, and that it is in this organ that the baby developps itself. You are a mammal. You became a feotus in the placenta.
You talked about cockroaches, not about reptilians or about aquatic creatures. Read the comment again.
YannisMk 5 days ago
@YannisMk You're 13. You have no idea what you're talking about and have misinterpreted what you've read. I don't watch media, but as a small child, you might not think to ask before you assume. Come back when you grow up and we'll chat.
tomperanteau 5 days ago
@tomperanteau not everything that lives in the ocean had gills, theres plenty of mammals living in the ocean without gills and plenty of other creatures like cepholapods, sea horses, mollusks, lobsters and plenty of others that live underwater without gills, gills are just one way of drawing oxygen out of water, our ancestors werent fish at somepoint however if you go back farther fish and mammals will have evolved from the same ancestor at some point.
fishboy1111111 3 days ago
The only way to debunk this footprint is by video documenting the actual process of carving or sandblasting into granite.
To recreate this footprint will require a human or group of humans with an average IQ 140 to 200 to accurately replicate this...
Let's face it. You are not recreating this footprint with an average IQ of 108
BIGJAXnet 2 weeks ago
The problem I have with this is first it's claimed to be a footprint in granite and then it's described as a footprint in mud. Well it can't be both, so which is it?
drummer4theperish 2 weeks ago
Ever hear of a Sandblaster? They can most certainly make a precision footprint cut such as this one into the stone. This archaeology uncovering giants seems pure hogwash, it's just not enough evidence that this was in fact NOT sandblasted in. You may now flame away! xD
Xp3ktus 2 weeks ago
@Xp3ktus Hmmm. It was first discovered in 1912, I believe. Did they have sandblaster in the remote regions of Africa then?
Indigovioletfilms 1 week ago
@Indigovioletfilms Well you strike a good point. I want to believe it is all true because it's fascinating but there are far too many conspiracies to not reconsider.
Xp3ktus 1 week ago
@Xp3ktus It is wise not believe everything we see on youtube. Healthy skepticism is good, but its also good to keep an open mind. Even if they had sandblasting techniques why would anyone perpetrate a hoax in a place where there was virtually no chance of anyone ever seeing it. Most perps want some ego gratification for their efforts and that would be unlikely here. Records of ancient cultures also assert there were giants in the past. This warrants further investigation at least.
Indigovioletfilms 4 days ago
@Indigovioletfilms The first abrasive blasting technique appeared in 1870...
YannisMk 1 week ago
@YannisMk Do you really think one of the first things that would have been accomplished with the brand new primitive blasting that existed in 1870 would have been to drag it to a remote area in South Africa up a hill to form a footprint in solid rock? If it was even possible the time and expense involved would have been extreme. And the result? Form a footprint that would not be widely known about for over 100 years? What you are suggesting is illogical. This is real and hidden by "science".
Meathead36 1 week ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
@Meathead36 Hey, make up your mind... The guy said "Hmmm. It was first discovered in 1912, I believe. Did they have sandblaster in the remote regions of Africa then?". We are talking about 42 years later !! LEARN YOUR MATHS, MEAT HEAD !!!!
YannisMk 6 days ago
Comment removed
Indigovioletfilms 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@YannisMk Was it portable? Hard to imagine what would motivate someone to lug sandblasting equipment and machete their way through miles of uncharted jungle just to do this in a place no one ever goes..
Indigovioletfilms 4 days ago
Great video. Thank you so much :)
kaostwenty2 2 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
3:36 It is not impossible to have a shape like that.. It could be very unlikely but nevertheles it could happen in billions of year! Think: a giant (human or not) fell in to that mud and died, fossilized! Then the cataclism! pulled the fossilized giant above the ground level into the lava! BINGO!
kaostwenty2 2 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
giant spiderman
reef99red 2 weeks ago
the person that left that print would've been just under 25 feet tall. Holy Shit!
redlikewater 2 weeks ago
Maybe a being of such a nature could walk on lava without being burned. I have seen videos of people walking on hot coals without being burned so.....
So1othurn 2 weeks ago
they also tell a story of a cataclistic meaning "very big" catastrophy...al say it was water...mmm? funny heyy?
thekomakino 3 weeks ago
all religions, old drawing, cultures etc from all over the world are in fact telling the story from the giants, 2brothers fighting and a Godly son born from a earth woman and a god like creature...mmm?funny hey?
thekomakino 3 weeks ago
That footprint is a Nephilum. they were trying to find higher ground when God brought the Great Deluge to kill them. The Giant was trying to escape by crawling up this cliff, but it did him no good cause the flood eventually overwhelmed him.
irvinemuscles 3 weeks ago
Granite is an igneous rock and is formed from magma, their feet would be smoulder. Go and do some basic geology, bloody fools.
Insolation1 3 weeks ago
@Insolation1 If it was an alien / god would it not be immune ?
ogoboogo 3 weeks ago
@Insolation1 yep - its also formed at great depths so there's no way this was on the surface when it was still soft enough to take an imprint.
1Alpha1AlhaBeta 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CLICK MY NAME AND SEE THE REAL GARDEN OF EDEN FOR THE FIRST TIME- PROMISE- *It's EPIC* Then
come back here and tell the others what you found. I'm telling the truth- I FOUND IT !
God is real and I can prove it. Look at my channel and see what I found using google earth
and also found hidden in famous paintings. I really can prove it... please come see and make
sure you read all I've written.
downyourtube 3 weeks ago
BOO for monetizing your account and displaying advertisements!!!
ScottD98052 3 weeks ago
At Glozel, France human hand prints were found in ancient clay blocks. They are HUGE hands. They measure 25 cm to 35 cm long and up to 22 cm across the palms, and could only have been made by humans between 2 and 4 METERS high.
The museum of Glozel has these hand prints on display. Also very "robust" bones were found at the site including parts of a skull "twice as thick as normal."
Other giants have been found in ancient sites in France: Castelnau for example.
rephaim23 1 month ago
@rephaim23 These unbelieving fools will never believe, till they see Jesus Christ coming in the clouds with His Holy Angels to judge the earth. But it will be too late for them by that time.
irvinemuscles 3 weeks ago
@irvinemuscles
Well, I encourage skepticism, I mean I suspect the rock formation here could be natural but have been indented on the toes. Or maybe it is genuine. It's certainly interesting. I'd like to see it examined by geologists, and anthropologists.
rephaim23 3 weeks ago
@irvinemuscles
If a series of several tracks can be found, then this could be genuine. For every hoax or natural explanation there might be a real one out there. The world still has lots of mysteries, in fact 86% of the world's living species are estimate to be either poorly studied or not even identified by science yet, according to a National Geographic story I read last year. That says it all.
rephaim23 3 weeks ago
@rephaim23 National Pornographic?
thekomakino 3 weeks ago
@thekomakino
Yes, National Pornographic. Haven't you heard?
rephaim23 3 weeks ago
how did a 7 metre tall giant make an impact in granite?
TaigaSibirskaya 1 month ago
@TaigaSibirskaya hey, check out how the stone blocks are set in peru. some temples in egypt are also done in a similar manner. it is as though they were molded to fit perfectly together or were set on top of one-another while still in a malleable state, kind of like clay
shroomingnewman 3 weeks ago
smithsonian scumbags should arrive soon and wisk it away to never be seen again. remember they gotta put the lie out there we are evolved stupid apes...ooga booga
bubber25 1 month ago
To me this means giants of old knew how to dissolve stone; similar to the giants of South America. Problem is if giants knew how to dissolve stone, then dating stone almost impossible. Of course, stupid people could say you can't dissolve stone, but then that's why they're stupid people.
A closer reference is the Bible.Trouble is whoever designed us, did it in such a way, no matter what type of humanoid we came in contact with -we'll assimilate them genetically. Brilliant design you must say.
RogerLucasTango 1 month ago
lol....footprint..good one!!! wouldnt chicken wings eem puny to them? wouldnt all animals and plants seem puny!
xamot27 1 month ago
@xamot27 did dinosaurs excist?
lourensdebeer2000 1 month ago
@lourensdebeer2000 whats yur point? millions of fossils suggest they did
xamot27 1 month ago
@xamot27 So why not giants?
lourensdebeer2000 1 month ago
@lourensdebeer2000 if you dont get why not then theres no discussing with you. anyone who believes this must also believe in fairies and goblins. wow...just wow...if youre a little kid i might see why but if youre an adult!?!?!?! im speechless
xamot27 1 month ago
@xamot27 so you are one of those people who say - your way is the only way! I someone does'net believe in the way you think then they are children. I remember when I was in primary school how little kids when they could not have things their way! - starter screaming and crying, - sound familiar? It doesn't mean to believe in the history of the old scriptures and that a few giants (gods - remember Greek etc legends?) walked the earth on believe in fairies and goblins and than one is a child!
lourensdebeer2000 1 month ago
@lourensdebeer2000 im not saying my way is the only way. the implications of your claim ( there being giants ) would have to have collateral evidence. i.e. way more footprints, way more bones (more than NONE) why is there only one here? why is it vertical? wheres all the dwellings these giants would have lived in? would all the animals be relative in size or not?
xamot27 1 month ago
@xamot27 all are legitimate questions. How many dinosaur bones and skeletons have they found in comparison with the millions of them that must be out there? If one take the history in the old scriptures to heart, there couldn't have been many giants - so what would the chances of finding remaining bones and skeletons be - very slim I imagine. There are many reasons for it to be vertical. Tell me - do you believe earth to be the only inhabited planet in the universe?
lourensdebeer2000 1 month ago
@xamot27 How ignorant!
airielle4 1 month ago
just imagine the size of his cock!!!!
MrCraigweddell 1 month ago
Maybe it was running from the flood? It could have been half cooled. Still would have seared the skin right off, but if your running for your life....... The best argument from Ian Juby is NOT that it ISN'T a footprint, but that it cannot be concluded as one with only ONE footprint to go off of. Typically something walking will leave more than one, and without at least a pair, you can't really come to a conclusion.
truthseeker1973 1 month ago
Not to debunk giants, but no living being is going to leave a footprint in lava (the precursor to granite) and live. This might be believable if the rock was sedimentary. Even if a giant accidentally stepped into a puddle of molten rock, the heat would deform the impression into something more skeletal than fleshy. This is just a unique and coincidental erosive action and the claim is bovine excrement!
dtaylz4me 1 month ago
@dtaylz4me who said that it was lava he walked in?
shinybrightknight 1 month ago
Since when do people leave footprints in granite? Cough cough *BS* cough
FlipFlibbo 1 month ago
I must say it does look like a footprint.
robert1352 1 month ago
neph 6 toes?
0allonby 1 month ago
do I see a possible ...6? toes
0allonby 1 month ago
Look, just because something looks like something doesn't make it true.
Do a search for paper mache troll.
Madrid15O 1 month ago
I knew it. I knew it. I knew it! Thanks for this video!
lightsout9999 1 month ago
THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO FAKE, if you understand pyshics at all
george7981 1 month ago
This is who built monolithic structures!
QueenCheeba 1 month ago
@QueenCheeba
Then you must still believe that they used extreme brute force to build ancient mega monolithic structures.
ZeroSixtyFive 1 month ago
Looks to me like those "stones" are actually poured cement probably from 10-20 K yrs ago. Notice the different sizes and outlines of each stone, just like in all the ancient temples to make them earthquake proof. Either that or they cut these rocks to make this "structure" with the footprint in it already. Very Interesting, when will people wake up to what all is being hidden from us, namely our past and anything to do with other types/forms of life/man.
00SKuNKy00 1 month ago
Thanks for continuing to share your footage, this is very interesting!
Semimaru 1 month ago
awesome, thanks for the additional info Mike!
Thexxhellcatxx 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Looks good. But so do those threes that look like boobs. There are things out there that are going to look like something. When you think logically about this, what the giant walked up the rock?? It kicked the rock?? The rock was once mud and changed to stone?? So wouldn't there be more foot prints like this all over that area?
benz1980i 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
when the GOD are LIGHT OR PLASMA they can do a metaphysics change over granit or rock, dont use a human and limitated logic to get conclusions ...
skyfader 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Couldn't it be possible that it just LOOKS like a footprint but isn't an actual footprint..... ? Jesus! If you spent your time spreading the truth, instead of this stupidity, the world would be a much better place.
marlene1374 1 month ago
@marlene1374 If the unwilling to believe would just examine the evidence with an open mind. But I suppose the critical part of this is having an open mind.
willquietwalker 1 month ago
@marlene1374 I'm a total follower of YaHSHuaH the Christ and I can tel you that that footprint is real. I stay 75km from that footprint and saw it the first time as a 4year old child (50years ago) when almost nobody knew about it. Step into stiff mud and it makes a identical same form.
It seems like some "Christians" haven't read the book Genesis in the Bible. That giants walked the earth, because of what the fallen angels have done!
lourensdebeer2000 1 month ago
@lourensdebeer2000 too bad it looks like a footprint and not a brain....
marlene1374 1 month ago
@lourensdebeer2000 I've read Genesis.It's a fairytale What do you think of the part in which the men from Sodom want Lot to send the 2 males out so they can screw them in the ass? Hilarious! This video is bullshit for idiots. That rock was carved out by stones being pushed around by high fast water after storms. That rock was once part of an ancient creek bed. I know where there is a mountain stream bed that has many similar examples of this type of rock wear.
bucksmasher1 1 month ago
@bucksmasher1 obviously there are millions of people that are not open minded. Yes it could have been water carving it over millions of years. If you see it up close and know how stiff mud forms when stepped on - one would see the amazing similarities.
And Genesis - surprisingly more than a fairy tale. One can just look around in this day and age and see how barbaric and stupid the human race can react - and especially in time of stress and war to try and same there own skin!
lourensdebeer2000 1 month ago
@lourensdebeer2000 I forgot to say that the 2 males in the Genesis story were angels so it is nothing but a fairytale.. We adults know that there are NO angels,devils,sugar-plum fairies,demons,jinns,witches or Big Foot. Humans have gotten bigger not smaller. There were never giant people.
bucksmasher1 1 month ago
@bucksmasher1 - I know they angels - doesn't that say something to you? And a hunter call himself an adult - well that is one way of seeing things.
I would love to take this "religion" thing further with you, but we cannot here as this post is about a "footprint" in the rock. Maybe if you could suggest another forum or want to e-mail me.
lourensdebeer2000 1 month ago
@lourensdebeer2000 Just because IT LOOKS like a footprint doesn't mean IT IS a footprint.
marlene1374 3 weeks ago
@marlene1374 please - read all my posts - maybe you'll understand!
lourensdebeer2000 3 weeks ago
Keep on it Mike!
glennwih 1 month ago
24 feet giants...WOW
Jiggs46 1 month ago
Thank you for the follow-up Michael. Fascinating. Looking forward to confirmation by geologists and perhaps a doctor with forensic expertise. Namaste.
NewDayDawning2012 1 month ago
OMG! I feel so, so blessed to live SO close by!
Hey Michael, dismiss all the inevitable skeptics, but instead, work on that 'beer belly' of yours~ that which, if I remember correctly, wasn't there a mere year ago. Travelling has it's big DISadvantages, as is evident with our dearest David Icke too~it's ALL due to take aways, restaurant, hotel etc. meals & MAYBE in your instance, too many BRAAIS!!! Beware, & try to go the blended fruit & vegetable route instead. We want YOU around longest!
KZN
annie46664 1 month ago
You are far & away the most exciting guy in the field MT. Really you have hit the "TRUTH". Hope you don't get hurt my friend as this data blows away the crap that has been heaped on the truth of humans. BTW do you know GINGER BAKER (ex-client i'm a talent rep) he's living in SA married a local girl. lol. Again you are the truth sir. robbie 'bob" robinson
60RHPWINNER 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Strange that it is sideways.. only thing i could think of is if it was a footprint and not a natural phenomenon then maybe the crust had shifted during a pole shift or major earthquake and thus the granite tilted and rose away from the earth (rather than being buried over the millenia) what do you think?
twohseven 1 month ago
Let's just say that a real giant did this and it wasn't a carving. The foot narrows out toward the heel, while running, when creating prints (with ink, mud, etc.). This is because, when you walk, more weight is distributed across your feet but, when you run, less weight is distributed as you spring (run) across the ground. So, if this was a real, living giant then it would be possible for the arch of the foot to oddly narrow down to the heel. Thanks for posting this video!
TheOniOokami 1 month ago
Fantastic WORK Michael.
Since 11-12 foot tall giants existed, science needs to look carefully at 24 foot giants. The world is full of mysteries, things yet to be discovered.
rephaim23 1 month ago
lol unfit little piglet.
dionhenderson 1 month ago
Incredible, thank you for posting this. There WERE Giants in those days!
007jjb 1 month ago
@007jjb ~ TRUE! And they STILL exist today! They are called AGARTHANS (I think) & live in Inner & Hollow Earth. The dude who visited them with his Dad in a tiny sail boat up around Scandinavia told the most amazing story, which totally resonated with me, yet the poor guy spent most of his life thereafter in prison, having been deemed insane & dishonest etc. How absolutely tragic, when he was simply sharing the absolute TRUTH ~ that which the ILLUMINATI have attempted to deny ALL of us for eons!
annie46664 1 month ago 2
how much pressure does it take to create an impression that deep in granite? 1000 tons
neutrino422 1 month ago
@neutrino422 I seriously doubt it was done as when the surface was granite, in his earlier video, he surmised it was done in mud, and through 'aeons'/millions of years, somehow this mud compounded into Granite. I wish they would do close ups on the coins. as I would hope this isn't a stage/set-up. I wish there was encryptedGPS/EXIF/data in these videos for location.
intermatrixnaut1 1 month ago
@intermatrixnaut1 Granite is created by incredible forces of pressure. There's no way a foot print would survive the pressure. It looks old so there are two possible explanations. It is either a very strange natural occurance or the laws of physics were different at that time.
neutrino422 1 month ago
@neutrino422 It's not granite - it's just normal ancient rock that was formed by clay. And the footprint is real.
lourensdebeer2000 1 month ago
@lourensdebeer2000 that makes much more sense
neutrino422 1 month ago
Great update Michael and Klaus. Thanks for posting this.
bblcsedona 1 month ago
Is there anyway you can make a plaster cast of that, so you can do a detail study of this footprint. thanks for sharing
marlie501 1 month ago
Excellent:)
Toltecnology 1 month ago
You don't get fossils or footprints in Granite, It is formed miles beneath the ground, Soooo... It is either not granite or it's fake.
brennanclan 1 month ago 2
Well done, gentlemen! Keep up with the great job.
dfgjhjggnmbmbm 1 month ago
7.5 meters is 24.6 feet tall
stormpoet76 1 month ago
Fantastic. Thanks Michael.
LegacyofUrartu 1 month ago
Well, it's not a Fallujah giant. great job :)
MrMinutemen 1 month ago
Wow! Thank you and all who are helping with this fascinating area. My first thought was hate to run into the one who made that print!! Is there other prints around that one?
TheJoymum 1 month ago
AMAZING...!
MissFireballxl5 1 month ago
Hello Micheal, thank you for sharing this with us. Is there a possibility to upload shoot the video again but than in Wide Screen and in Full HD or at least in HD Ready format. I want to put this video on my Nokia N8 and show it to my colleagues. I follow the Ancient Alien theory for years now (I started when I was 14 years old or 15) and it looks to me that a lot of loose puzzles are falling together to create one explanation. Again thanks for the upload.
theprodejeff 1 month ago