Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (120)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Your right Michael it would make a good tourist attraction .

  • what the atheist are going to say now????????

  • @milivela5 wtf does that even mean, a giant footprint doesnt prove god exists, if anything it disproves the bible and backs up athiests because of the age of the footprint

  • @fishboy1111111 where does the bible state the age of the earth?

  • out of the the billions of years of evolution on this planet.....how is it not possible for giants to have been here? Visited...checked things out....realized at that time the plant may not have been habitable...and then left.....it is reasonable to think such a think could have happened....

  • After careful examination, I have determined that this giant had only one leg and was navigating a partly cooled lava field. Imagine something the size of a sperm whale hoping on one foot. The foot broke the crust resulting in one giant hot foot impression. He then rolled down the hill, screaming in agony into a now prehistoric lake and drowned. Soon after the nearby volcano expelled millions of tonnes of ash and mud burying the footprint. Eventually, the earth thrusted the print out again.

  • i do believe i heard credo mutwa tell about this micheal!

  • God I just read the tags, and what ??? "Astronomy", "Geology" ?! How dare you talk about REAL science on such a moron-trap video ??? And "Summerians" ?? They are real !!! GIANTS ARE NOT !!!

  • Wonder what he could Bench Press :P

  • Many Darwinists on suicide watch after this one.

  • I just imagine how huge his dick was :PP

  • Klaus Donna must have flat feet to question the shape of what looks to be a healthy arch, either that or the giant had bunions?

  • Oh please. Why only one? Where is the other foot? Why have no skeletons been found? 200 million years ago? Humans were still half monkeys 4 million years ago.

  • @BrooklynBhoy There have been giant skeletons found. The question you should be asking is why "science" has hidden them. The Rockefeller name also surfaces which shouldn't be a surprise to people that fully understand the game being played.

  • @BrooklynBhoy Skeletal remains after 200 million years? "Oh please". Who knows what might have happened to the other footprint. They were probably separated by several yards to begin with.

    If you want to believe that your ancestors were apes, go for it. I'm still waiting for explanations as to why so many species that also supposedly evolved with us are not intelligent, too. Cockroaches have been around longer than man, so shouldn't they be far ahead of humans?

  • @tomperanteau Please. Read The Origins of Species. Do you really think that EVERY specie on Earth should have evolved the same way ? "Oh please". Cockroaches are insects. Not mammals like the apes. If they would have evolved to be more intelligent than men, they should have grown waaaaay bigger than their normal size. And since we all know that they would crumble under their own wheigt ! Just like giant spiders.

    Now CQFD, comme on dit en France.

  • @YannisMk Because you need to be spoon-fed your ideas as opposed to researching things on your own, does't mean everyone else does. You're only 13. I prefer to research and think for myself. If you need to read what someone else says, instead of thinking on your own, go for it.

    So, tell us all what you base your assertion on that only mammals should have evolved. If, as evolutionists think, we came from the ocean, then we once had gills. Fish aren't mammals.

    Try to reason for yourself.

  • @tomperanteau You say you think for yourself and research. I don't call a Youtube search "researching". What I call reasearching is thinking BY YOURSELF, which you obviously did not do. YOU are the one spoon-fed.. by Youtube users like the one who posted this vide. Have you seen his other videos ? One of them is "Secret Numbers of GOD" ! How can you believe this ? God has telephone ? I believe you are a Creationist. And you say think for yourself ?

  • @YannisMk Sorry, I was out of letters. Also, it looks like a 13 years old boy is less influenced by the medias and by legends than you are.

    I did not say only mammals could evolve.

  • @YannisMk Out of letters again, sorry. --You see, millions of years ago, mammals did not exist ; but then after millions of years of evolution, some little rodents developped something called the placenta. You may know that the placent is what every mammal on Earth has, and that it is in this organ that the baby developps itself. You are a mammal. You became a feotus in the placenta.

    You talked about cockroaches, not about reptilians or about aquatic creatures. Read the comment again.

  • @YannisMk You're 13. You have no idea what you're talking about and have misinterpreted what you've read. I don't watch media, but as a small child, you might not think to ask before you assume. Come back when you grow up and we'll chat.

  • @tomperanteau not everything that lives in the ocean had gills, theres plenty of mammals living in the ocean without gills and plenty of other creatures like cepholapods, sea horses, mollusks, lobsters and plenty of others that live underwater without gills, gills are just one way of drawing oxygen out of water, our ancestors werent fish at somepoint however if you go back farther fish and mammals will have evolved from the same ancestor at some point.

  • The only way to debunk this footprint is by video documenting the actual process of carving or sandblasting into granite.

    To recreate this footprint will require a human or group of humans with an average IQ 140 to 200 to accurately replicate this...

    Let's face it. You are not recreating this footprint with an average IQ of 108

  • The problem I have with this is first it's claimed to be a footprint in granite and then it's described as a footprint in mud. Well it can't be both, so which is it?

  • Ever hear of a Sandblaster? They can most certainly make a precision footprint cut such as this one into the stone. This archaeology uncovering giants seems pure hogwash, it's just not enough evidence that this was in fact NOT sandblasted in. You may now flame away! xD

  • @Xp3ktus Hmmm. It was first discovered in 1912, I believe. Did they have sandblaster in the remote regions of Africa then?

  • @Indigovioletfilms Well you strike a good point.  I want to believe it is all true because it's fascinating but there are far too many conspiracies to not reconsider.

  • @Xp3ktus It is wise not believe everything we see on youtube. Healthy skepticism is good, but its also good to keep an open mind. Even if they had sandblasting techniques why would anyone perpetrate a hoax in a place where there was virtually no chance of anyone ever seeing it. Most perps want some ego gratification for their efforts and that would be unlikely here. Records of ancient cultures also assert there were giants in the past. This warrants further investigation at least.

  • @Indigovioletfilms The first abrasive blasting technique appeared in 1870...

  • @YannisMk Do you really think one of the first things that would have been accomplished with the brand new primitive blasting that existed in 1870 would have been to drag it to a remote area in South Africa up a hill to form a footprint in solid rock? If it was even possible the time and expense involved would have been extreme. And the result? Form a footprint that would not be widely known about for over 100 years? What you are suggesting is illogical. This is real and hidden by "science".

  • Comment removed

  • Great video. Thank you so much :)

  • 3:36 It is not impossible to have a shape like that.. It could be very unlikely but nevertheles it could happen in billions of year! Think: a giant (human or not) fell in to that mud and died, fossilized! Then the cataclism! pulled the fossilized giant above the ground level into the lava! BINGO!

  • giant spiderman

  • the person that left that print would've been just under 25 feet tall. Holy Shit!

  • Maybe a being of such a nature could walk on lava without being burned. I have seen videos of people walking on hot coals without being burned so.....

  • they also tell a story of a cataclistic meaning "very big" catastrophy...al say it was water...mmm? funny heyy?

  • all religions, old drawing, cultures etc from all over the world are in fact telling the story from the giants, 2brothers fighting and a Godly son born from a earth woman and a god like creature...mmm?funny hey?

  • That footprint is a Nephilum. they were trying to find higher ground when God brought the Great Deluge to kill them. The Giant was trying to escape by crawling up this cliff, but it did him no good cause the flood eventually overwhelmed him.

  • Granite is an igneous rock and is formed from magma, their feet would be smoulder. Go and do some basic geology, bloody fools.

  • @Insolation1 If it was an alien / god would it not be immune ?

  • @Insolation1 yep - its also formed at great depths so there's no way this was on the surface when it was still soft enough to take an imprint.

  • BOO for monetizing your account and displaying advertisements!!!

  • At Glozel, France human hand prints were found in ancient clay blocks. They are HUGE hands. They measure 25 cm to 35 cm long and up to 22 cm across the palms, and could only have been made by humans between 2 and 4 METERS high.

    The museum of Glozel has these hand prints on display. Also very "robust" bones were found at the site including parts of a skull "twice as thick as normal."

    Other giants have been found in ancient sites in France: Castelnau for example.

  • @rephaim23 These unbelieving fools will never believe, till they see Jesus Christ coming in the clouds with His Holy Angels to judge the earth. But it will be too late for them by that time.

  • @irvinemuscles

    Well, I encourage skepticism, I mean I suspect the rock formation here could be natural but have been indented on the toes. Or maybe it is genuine. It's certainly interesting. I'd like to see it examined by geologists, and anthropologists.

  • @irvinemuscles

    If a series of several tracks can be found, then this could be genuine. For every hoax or natural explanation there might be a real one out there. The world still has lots of mysteries, in fact 86% of the world's living species are estimate to be either poorly studied or not even identified by science yet, according to a National Geographic story I read last year. That says it all.

  • @rephaim23 National Pornographic?

  • @thekomakino

    Yes, National Pornographic. Haven't you heard?

  • how did a 7 metre tall giant make an impact in granite?

  • @TaigaSibirskaya hey, check out how the stone blocks are set in peru. some temples in egypt are also done in a similar manner. it is as though they were molded to fit perfectly together or were set on top of one-another while still in a malleable state, kind of like clay

  • smithsonian scumbags should arrive soon and wisk it away to never be seen again. remember they gotta put the lie out there we are evolved stupid apes...ooga booga

  • To me this means giants of old knew how to dissolve stone; similar to the giants of South America. Problem is if giants knew how to dissolve stone, then dating stone almost impossible. Of course, stupid people could say you can't dissolve stone, but then that's why they're stupid people.

    A closer reference is the Bible.Trouble is whoever designed us, did it in such a way, no matter what type of humanoid we came in contact with -we'll assimilate them genetically. Brilliant design you must say.

  • lol....footprint..good one!!! wouldnt chicken wings eem puny to them? wouldnt all animals and plants seem puny!

  • @xamot27 did dinosaurs excist?

  • @lourensdebeer2000 whats yur point? millions of fossils suggest they did

  • @xamot27 So why not giants?

  • @lourensdebeer2000 if you dont get why not then theres no discussing with you. anyone who believes this must also believe in fairies and goblins. wow...just wow...if youre a little kid i might see why but if youre an adult!?!?!?! im speechless

  • @xamot27 so you are one of those people who say - your way is the only way! I someone does'net believe in the way you think then they are children. I remember when I was in primary school how little kids when they could not have things their way! - starter screaming and crying, - sound familiar? It doesn't mean to believe in the history of the old scriptures and that a few giants (gods - remember Greek etc legends?) walked the earth on believe in fairies and goblins and than one is a child!

  • @lourensdebeer2000 im not saying my way is the only way. the implications of your claim ( there being giants ) would have to have collateral evidence. i.e. way more footprints, way more bones (more than NONE) why is there only one here? why is it vertical? wheres all the dwellings these giants would have lived in? would all the animals be relative in size or not?

  • @xamot27 all are legitimate questions. How many dinosaur bones and skeletons have they found in comparison with the millions of them that must be out there? If one take the history in the old scriptures to heart, there couldn't have been many giants - so what would the chances of finding remaining bones and skeletons be - very slim I imagine. There are many reasons for it to be vertical. Tell me - do you believe earth to be the only inhabited planet in the universe?

  • @xamot27 How ignorant!

  • just imagine the size of his cock!!!!

  • Maybe it was running from the flood? It could have been half cooled. Still would have seared the skin right off, but if your running for your life....... The best argument from Ian Juby is NOT that it ISN'T a footprint, but that it cannot be concluded as one with only ONE footprint to go off of. Typically something walking will leave more than one, and without at least a pair, you can't really come to a conclusion.

  • Not to debunk giants, but no living being is going to leave a footprint in lava (the precursor to granite) and live. This might be believable if the rock was sedimentary. Even if a giant accidentally stepped into a puddle of molten rock, the heat would deform the impression into something more skeletal than fleshy. This is just a unique and coincidental erosive action and the claim is bovine excrement!

  • @dtaylz4me  who said that it was lava he walked in?

  • Since when do people leave footprints in granite? Cough cough *BS*  cough

  • I must say it does look like a footprint.

  • neph 6 toes?

  • do I see a possible ...6? toes

  • Look, just because something looks like something doesn't make it true.

    Do a search for paper mache troll.

  • I knew it. I knew it. I knew it! Thanks for this video!

  • THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO FAKE, if you understand pyshics at all

  • This is who built monolithic structures!

  • @QueenCheeba

    Then you must still believe that they used extreme brute force to build ancient mega monolithic structures.

  • Looks to me like those "stones" are actually poured cement probably from 10-20 K yrs ago. Notice the different sizes and outlines of each stone, just like in all the ancient temples to make them earthquake proof. Either that or they cut these rocks to make this "structure" with the footprint in it already. Very Interesting, when will people wake up to what all is being hidden from us, namely our past and anything to do with other types/forms of life/man.

  • Thanks for continuing to share your footage, this is very interesting!

  • awesome, thanks for the additional info Mike!

  • when the GOD are LIGHT OR PLASMA they can do a metaphysics change over granit or rock, dont use a human and limitated logic to get conclusions ...

  • Couldn't it be possible that it just LOOKS like a footprint but isn't an actual footprint..... ? Jesus! If you spent your time spreading the truth, instead of this stupidity, the world would be a much better place.

  • @marlene1374 If the unwilling to believe would just examine the evidence with an open mind. But I suppose the critical part of this is having an open mind.

  • @marlene1374 I'm a total follower of YaHSHuaH the Christ and I can tel you that that footprint is real. I stay 75km from that footprint and saw it the first time as a 4year old child (50years ago) when almost nobody knew about it. Step into stiff mud and it makes a identical same form.

    It seems like some "Christians" haven't read the book Genesis in the Bible. That giants walked the earth, because of what the fallen angels have done!

  • @lourensdebeer2000 too bad it looks like a footprint and not a brain....

  • @lourensdebeer2000 I've read Genesis.It's a fairytale What do you think of the part in which the men from Sodom want Lot to send the 2 males out so they can screw them in the ass? Hilarious! This video is bullshit for idiots. That rock was carved out by stones being pushed around by high fast water after storms. That rock was once part of an ancient creek bed. I know where there is a mountain stream bed that has many similar examples of this type of rock wear.

  • @bucksmasher1 obviously there are millions of people that are not open minded. Yes it could have been water carving it over millions of years. If you see it up close and know how stiff mud forms when stepped on - one would see the amazing similarities.

    And Genesis - surprisingly more than a fairy tale. One can just look around in this day and age and see how barbaric and stupid the human race can react - and especially in time of stress and war to try and same there own skin!

  • @lourensdebeer2000 I forgot to say that the 2 males in the Genesis story were angels so it is nothing but a fairytale.. We adults know that there are NO angels,devils,sugar-plum fairies,demons,jinns,witches or Big Foot. Humans have gotten bigger not smaller. There were never giant people.

  • @bucksmasher1 - I know they angels - doesn't that say something to you? And a hunter call himself an adult - well that is one way of seeing things.

    I would love to take this "religion" thing further with you, but we cannot here as this post is about a "footprint" in the rock. Maybe if you could suggest another forum or want to e-mail me.

  • @lourensdebeer2000 Just because IT LOOKS like a footprint doesn't mean IT IS a footprint.

  • @marlene1374 please - read all my posts - maybe you'll understand!

  • Keep on it Mike!

  • 24 feet giants...WOW

  • Thank you for the follow-up Michael. Fascinating. Looking forward to confirmation by geologists and perhaps a doctor with forensic expertise. Namaste.

  • OMG! I feel so, so blessed to live SO close by!

    Hey Michael, dismiss all the inevitable skeptics, but instead, work on that 'beer belly' of yours~ that which, if I remember correctly, wasn't there a mere year ago. Travelling has it's big DISadvantages, as is evident with our dearest David Icke too~it's ALL due to take aways, restaurant, hotel etc. meals & MAYBE in your instance, too many BRAAIS!!! Beware, & try to go the blended fruit & vegetable route instead. We want YOU around longest!

    KZN

  • You are far & away the most exciting guy in the field MT. Really you have hit the "TRUTH". Hope you don't get hurt my friend as this data blows away the crap that has been heaped on the truth of humans. BTW do you know GINGER BAKER (ex-client i'm a talent rep) he's living in SA married a local girl. lol. Again you are the truth sir. robbie 'bob" robinson

  • Strange that it is sideways.. only thing i could think of is if it was a footprint and not a natural phenomenon then maybe the crust had shifted during a pole shift or major earthquake and thus the granite tilted and rose away from the earth (rather than being buried over the millenia) what do you think?

  • Let's just say that a real giant did this and it wasn't a carving. The foot narrows out toward the heel, while running, when creating prints (with ink, mud, etc.). This is because, when you walk, more weight is distributed across your feet but, when you run, less weight is distributed as you spring (run) across the ground. So, if this was a real, living giant then it would be possible for the arch of the foot to oddly narrow down to the heel. Thanks for posting this video!

  • Fantastic WORK Michael.

    Since 11-12 foot tall giants existed, science needs to look carefully at 24 foot giants. The world is full of mysteries, things yet to be discovered.

  • lol unfit little piglet.

  • Incredible, thank you for posting this. There WERE Giants in those days!

  • @007jjb ~ TRUE! And they STILL exist today! They are called AGARTHANS (I think) & live in Inner & Hollow Earth. The dude who visited them with his Dad in a tiny sail boat up around Scandinavia told the most amazing story, which totally resonated with me, yet the poor guy spent most of his life thereafter in prison, having been deemed insane & dishonest etc. How absolutely tragic, when he was simply sharing the absolute TRUTH ~ that which the ILLUMINATI have attempted to deny ALL of us for eons!

  • how much pressure does it take to create an impression that deep in granite? 1000 tons

  • @neutrino422 I seriously doubt it was done as when the surface was granite, in his earlier video, he surmised it was done in mud, and through 'aeons'/millions of years, somehow this mud compounded into Granite. I wish they would do close ups on the coins. as I would hope this isn't a stage/set-up. I wish there was encryptedGPS/EXIF/data in these videos for location.

  • @intermatrixnaut1 Granite is created by incredible forces of pressure. There's no way a foot print would survive the pressure. It looks old so there are two possible explanations. It is either a very strange natural occurance or the laws of physics were different at that time.

  • @neutrino422 It's not granite - it's just normal ancient rock that was formed by clay. And the footprint is real.

  • @lourensdebeer2000 that makes much more sense

  • Great update Michael and Klaus. Thanks for posting this.

  • Is there anyway you can make a plaster cast of that, so you can do a detail study of this footprint. thanks for sharing

  • Excellent:)

  • You don't get fossils or footprints in Granite, It is formed miles beneath the ground, Soooo... It is either not granite or it's fake.

  • Well done, gentlemen! Keep up with the great job.

  • 7.5 meters is 24.6 feet tall

  • Fantastic. Thanks Michael.

  • Well, it's not a Fallujah giant. great job :)

  • Wow! Thank you and all who are helping with this fascinating area. My first thought was hate to run into the one who made that print!! Is there other prints around that one?

  • AMAZING...!

  • Hello Micheal, thank you for sharing this with us. Is there a possibility to upload shoot the video again but than in Wide Screen and in Full HD or at least in HD Ready format. I want to put this video on my Nokia N8 and show it to my colleagues. I follow the Ancient Alien theory for years now (I started when I was 14 years old or 15) and it looks to me that a lot of loose puzzles are falling together to create one explanation. Again thanks for the upload.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more