Actually if Gaddafi was so bad,explain me why is Libya the most RICH country in Africa,most organized country in Africa and where people earn most of the money in Africa.Its is because of the same "dickhead" Gaddafi,who has been in power for 42 years and he brought Libya to what it was yesternday,a REAL country.
Yes I do support Gaddafi,actually I supported him,since he is long dead, but 80% of the ppl today in Libya,say,that it was better while Gaddafi was alive and they even started a rebelion
The lesson to take from this is that, ultimately, all dictators, and I mean all dictators will meet their Waterloo. But Kim il Jong seems to have survived that one. Hmmmn
According to Human Rights Watch between six and ten people were killed along with Gadaffi. Are we going to celebrate their summary executions too, I wonder? Do we even know who they were? Do we care? After all they were probably bastards too, eh? Nothing like summary justice. You know, Richard, perhaps the fact that you also are sitting there with *your* comfy western lifestyle in some way related to the fact that here we don't drag people out into the street and shoot them like a lynchmob.
But they sexually assaulted Gaddafi too before he was killed. I think they too far - if you look at Lybia's domestic policies, you'll see that they had it MUCH better off than those in Tunisia. And financially, they had better government welfare programs than those in Egypt.
Tunisia have done it much better. So did Egypt. They didn't need lynch black people or kill their former leaders on the spot.
There is nothing to celecrate about Gaddafi's death, he wasnt the worst dictator in the region, but was a pain in the arse to Western nations, and hence Tunesian rebels were paid to stir some shit in Lybia.
The ones the rule Lybia now are a nasty lot, they have been assasinating eachother well before Gaddafi was dead, and displayed the same behaviour we so badly criticised Gaddafi for during the attack on Sirte.
You've been watching too much "news". You really only have a small part of the story. He was whacked for profit. You won't find NATO overthrowing viscous dictators who cooperate with Western banks and oil companies.
Gadaffi mercilessly bombed the civilians of misrata promising to eradicate the city, women children the lot ,if he did that to my town and community , and loved ones , well to show him mercy in return , now that would take a saint.
In 1951 Libya was the poorest country in the world. While under Gaddafi's rule, Libya became the most prosperous country in Africa. Search the Tripoli hearing in July where over a million people support Gadaffi. Then search for some anti-Gaddafi protests. You'll notice not too many people or videos for that matter. And now what once was a civilized nation is going to be ruled by Sharia Law.
@IamLav - Not sure Gadffi can take credit for multi-national conglomerates discovering its oil reserves. I wonder how evenly distributed that wealth is among the people of Libya.
@BNPfuhrer Eh, he used majority of the oil revenues for the people. They had free healthcare and free university. Loans were interest free and Libya had no debt.
@IamLav - You’re still confusing 16 Universities with equality, claiming the NHS eradicated poverty & ill health and Muslim banking is interest free anyway. What about its human rights records, political prisoners and free speech?
@IamLav Well at least a large enough portion of the Libyan population was enough pissed off at him to take over the country and kill him.
I'm not saying that everything will be all rainbows and butterflies in Libya from now on. I'm just saying that apparently he was quite unpopular in some circles. And considering that he apart from making education and healthcare available also killed and tortured a lot of people for nothing more than disagreeing with him it isn't hard to understand why.
@DinMorsPimp Right. Well the reality is that he didn't kill too many people just for disagreeing with him. There were actually very few anti-Gaddafi protests going on, the western media just knows how to make a couple hundred people look like the entire nation. They've been using this type of propaganda for a long time. Search for Gadaffi's hearing in Tripoli during all of this. 1/3 of the entire nation gathers to support him.
@IamLav Exactly how many people do you have to kill and torture for disagreeing with you would it take for it to be TOO many? Where I come from it would be one. One person would be too many. Of cause we don't have the death-penalty here but then again we probably would have, for all practical purposes, if we let the torture-murder-victims relatives make the arrests.
Do you think that it takes more Libyans than for example Danes to meet your definition of "too many"? Are Libyans worth less?
@DinMorsPimp You're missing the point. Look at Libya now and what NATO has done to it. They also killed many more civilians than Gadaffi. Now, thousands more will suffer under a rebel state. How someone could justify this intervention is beyond me, the numbers don't add up.
@IamLav - Media news coverage of Anti-Gadaffi pro-democracy protestors being killed in their hundreds is not propaganda. We miss the point because you have none, claiming a regime change may make things worse or waffling about free universities etc is no apology for violent murderous dictatorship.
@BNPfuhrer Right. Well, the reality is, Gaddafi would have kept his people and country prospering. He was on the verge of changing his currency to gold called the African dinar. Not only was it going to prosper Libya but the entire north Africa. US didn't want that, England didn't want to pay in gold for their oil because they couldn't afford it, and France wanted a piece too.
@BNPfuhrer On top of oil, France is also taking over their water system which is a huge intricate pipeline that supplied 70% of Libyans with free water. Well, not after NATO bombed the pipes which take months to repair, and then bombed the pipeline factory a day later. All in all, Libya is now FUCKED.
Oh and, please find me some videos of anti-Gadaffi protests. I've only been able to find videos of a couple hundred to thousand people, while Gadaffi has gathered over a million.
@BNPfuhrer Lol, great video link. Is that the best you can do? Search for Gaddafi's hearing in Tripoli. You will see over a MILLION people gathered. Unlike the video you link which shows merely hundreds. That's practically NOTHING. The entire country will now go to shit. The interest free Libyan bank under Gaddafi's rule has been shut down and they've already implemented a rebel bank.
Nice to see how Gadaffi’s forces shooting peaceful demonstrators creates derision of laughter from you, you’re nothing more than an apologist for a terrorist murderous dictator. Oh and the new Libyan Sharia banking system is also interest free, mongo.
@IamLav yes the majority of the people supported Gadaffi , that is untill the NATO started using the media as a weapon, now we have some obscure rebel movement in power that wants Sharia law in practice, great fucking improvement, power to the people? lmao yea right, well let's see how the think about that in 6 months eh.
@IamLav This video and my comments are not trying to JUSTIFY the NATO INTERVENTION.
What Coughlan said in the video and I said in my comment is that given he after all was (among other things) a murderous dictator it is understandable that some of the people in Libya would want to kill Gaddafi.
I'm not saying that everything will be better now. I'm not even saying that it won't be worse now. And I'm not suggesting that problems don't usually result when the West meddle in other peoples wars.
@DinMorsPimp Except the fact that there wasn't a war to begin with. Majority of it was media propaganda, I know Libyans in my neighbourhood personally that have family IN Libya who say there is no uprising. There was definitely an "Arab spring" as they call it, but it was rather insignificant in Libya. Democracy means the majority rule, and the majority of Libyans were happy with their current situation. I suggest you do some research into why NATO intervened.
But I get the feeling that we are not talking about the same thing. You are still talking about the NATO intervention and I'm ONLY saying that it is understandable that some people would want to see Gaddafi dead. Those two things aren't mutually exclusive are they? NATO could have fucked it up big time in a country where the majority of people didn't want change while there still would be some people in Libya who wanted to kill Gadddafi for being a murderous dictator. Right?
@DinMorsPimp Ok. Yes, quite a lot of people wanted Gaddafi dead, but they are now much worse off after the NATO intervention. Gaddafi was a bad man, but he still prospered his country from being the poorest in the world to the richest in Africa.
@wybo2 Sigh. No, that's what your corporate media has told you. NATO killed many more civilians than Gaddafi did. What Gaddafi should have done was held a democratic election instead of shooting at rebel forces. Also, do you know how many people the rebels killed? Hundreds of Gaddafi's soldiers were slaughtered and tortured to death. Go on, find me these "anti-Gaddafi" protests. Search up "Tripoli Gaddafi speech july 1st" and see how many supporters he had.
@IamLav We were talking about today, you claimed people in Libya were worse off than before the intervention, I said that was BS. And ofcourse, people were better off at peace than in war-times, but there was war when the intervention began and peace has returned since it ended. We can only hope that it stays that way and doesn't end up in ethnic cleansing (like in Iraq).
"What Gaddafi should have done was held a democratic election instead of shooting at rebels" Couldn't agree more
@wybo2 Ethnic cleansing had began as soon as the rebels were armed by NATO. They killed, tortured, and kicked out thousands of black Libyans. The rest of Africa, including Libya loved Gaddafi, they saw him as their "saviour." He was on the verge of prospering the entire Northern Africa with his currency switch to the "African Dinar" which is a currency backed by gold. The rebels have already implemented Sharia law, it's definitely not going to get better. In reality, there was no "uprising."
@wybo2 No. There are plenty of videos and articles showing the amount of supporters Gaddafi had. I encourage you to find me similar vids/links of Mubarak supporters.
@IamLav Ps, are the people of Syria, Yemen and Bahrain rising up? Awnser me now, cus something tells me you will deny that if the west would intervene one day.
@wybo2 Well the protests in Yemen and Bahrain actually exist. As far as Syria goes, there are protesters on both sides and it's a fairly even split. The opposition is killing just as many people as the police forces. Most of these weapons are coming from Israel. Then there's (western) media propaganda which only focuses on the opposition, inevitably brainwashing its viewers who use the internet for entertainment and tv for news. What a twisted world we live in.
@IamLav The western media? I get most of my news from Al Jazeera(english) mate. Ps, I wouldn't trust a regime that bans all journalists other than from its own government controlled newsstation.
@wybo2 Al Jazeera? No wonder your views on Libya are so skewed. Qatar owns Al Jazeera. Qatar also has an American military base. They were also the second country to recognize the rebel forces. This was right after they were cut an oil deal btw. Not to mention that they also sent war planes to Libya. If you haven't figured out that Al Jazeera is pro-American then you are lost.
Come watch Aljazeera in Arabic and see the amount of negativity there is towards America.
Just because Aljazeera and most Arabs see eye to eye that Gadaffi and some dictators should be removed does not make them pro-American or Anti-american.
We disagree with certain American policies and thats about it and the English Aljazeera is a waterd down censored version made for your sensitive eyes.
Did you pay ANY attention to anything? The loyalist protesters didn't even gather en masse until late this summer, yet there've been opposition protests since last January. As a matter of fact, you are WRONG.
i agree that he was better dead than alive but he should have been put on trial, he got out easy, plus the nato forces were quite clearly going beyond their mission brief to 'protect civilians' during most of the campaign
@redskin133 If he had been put on trial he would have lived longer, and either been given a life sentence (a huge mercy for the fucker) or executed, which happened anyway. He deserved the horrible death he got - he deserved it a thousand times over.
Was Gaddafi genuinely unpopular among the people in Libya? The rebels were doomed until intervention from Great Britain, France and the US and still it took inordinately long time to get him. This could tell us the rebels were not exactly that popular. Looks nothing more than 1 dictator is being swapped for another, which is not something to celebrate.
I think it's a bit disrespectful but you're right. I couldn't stop laughing when you said, "the only thing you have to do to ensure you one day die is be alive!"
Gaddafi ducked plenty of times, but the Zionist stomping Golem, USA, under control of the jeduhi, holocausted Libya anyway. Zionists out of government.
It's funny you say you're not gonna judge and that people shouldn't judge from their ivory tower and then go on a judgmental rampage. Gaddafi wasn't that bad actually. Sure he killed some of his own people. What country hasn't done that? Atleast he provided free electricity, health care, houses and all that. You can't say that about any other country in the world.
What are you talking about? Soviet Russia gave people rationed food, no individual owned land, and free education was accessible to citizens of the USSR. It was a communist state, remember? What lies am I spilling?
Gaddafi oppressed the Libyan people, why do you think they revolted against him?
@JezzasCT I said im not usually a judgmental guy but what the hell do my videos about thunderf00t have to do with being judgemental, I judged him based on the things he repeatedly said and did.
@JezzasCT Ever heard the saying "don't judge a book by it's cover"? Well it's "don't judge a book by it's cover" not "don't judge a book by it's content".
I hate to be the guy who points this out, but there are more people alive today, than have ever been alive... ever. I said I hate to be that guy, but I lied. I loved it.
If you condone murderous thugs parading their victims before a cheering crowd in the moments before a humiliating execution just because we have not walked a mile in their shoes, where is the line to be drawn then? When is it not acceptable to treat another human this way?
When the person paraded is a mass murdering fuckhead well.....
I guess you dont support what the italians did to Mussolini then? They killed him and hung him up for all to see, 1 lady shot his corpse 5 times and many spat on him as they went by. I guess you are against that too?
@MitchofSmeg Ok. We have to be careful though. A person in my neighborhood tortured and killed another - retalitory gang violence. Individual interpretation of this important issue would lead to societal chaos.
Mate i am bisexual, i am scared of that shit happening to me just for that simple fact, so i get what you are saying, obviously on the small scale side, not acceptable, on to top level (ie mass murderers who are known as it) generally, i wouldnt blink twice for them.
Honestly I don't think we should kill people like this these are the kinda people you should very much so should lock up for the rest of their life why death is too good for them . You kill these people and view it as a punishment I sure the fuck don't what the fuck do they care they are dead they can't feel anything anymore.
@myY0UTUBEchanneI over nothing? you mean a dictator that terrorirsed his own people for 42 years? he's making a point you sad bastard, and has opinions. unlike you, who has a channel full of "favourites."
Thank you for making this video. It put my views on the issue all in one video. I have seen some real retards when it comes to this. One idiot on TJ's vid seriously said, "what about the constitution?"
This is by far NOT your most offensive video. In fact, I completely agree with you on this one. Your most offensive videos by far are that one about abortion... and constantly calling Christian blacks Uncle Toms. Very, Very offensive,taboo and just plain false.
I have every sympathy with the people. I can understand why they humiliated Gadaffi and beat him before his death. I was kind of pleased they did it. It would have been good for their cause however if they had captured him and put him on trial. Even if it was just a show trial. They could have still sentenced him to death but have the added joy of parading him to the World.
i actually heard a conspiracy nut try to say that Gadaffi was a great man who gave his people free healthcare and gold and was loved by all,and that the US was painting white people brown and sending them overseas to destabilize the country...the saddest part is that i've heard so many fucking conspiracies like this,i can no longer tell if the person was joking or not.
There were couple hundred people celebrating in the streets up the road from me in Rusholme that night... the only problem I had with it was that at first I thought they were protesting.
Except Qaddafi couldn't have been executed without NATO's help from the air. I don't think there was a "special situation" those anonymous accessories to assasination found themselves in. I think they enjoyed Western comforts with no experience of living under a "guy like that" or "walking in the shoes" of those who have Which means Fidel Castro putting Batista's torturers to the wall watered the tree of Cuban liberty. :)
Well I am glad the fucker is dead, but as a westerner I am not going to jump up and down or dance in the streets. I can understand why the Libyans are happy, but this in no way shape or form gets rid of terrorism, evil, totalitarianism, and stops new fucktards like Gadaffi, Sadam, Stalin, or Hitler from coming into power.
Yesterday there was a large group of Libyans by city hall and they were so ecstatic! They were dancing and cheering and stuff. I found it kind of morbid, but I don't really know about this guy. He must have really been one hell of an asshole if people are that happy about his death!
Regardless of what anyone does in life, once they are dead nothing else matters hence respect the dead, do the dna check or whatever and bury him somewhere secret, those rebels are mindless fucks and shot him when he was clearly not a threat anymore, revenge isn't a good thing to have and whoever shot him is a murderer
I am often disappointed when people attempt to enhance their opinion and make it more valid by the extensive use of profanity. It just undermines and marginalises anything worthwhile they have to say. Intelligent people with valid arguments just don't need to use it. You don't get Richard Dawkins calling the Pope a cunt. The word 'fuck' is so commonplace it's almost without meaning. Better to be articulate. Profanity IMHO is counter productive. Think about it cocksuckers.
you've got a nice point there, why would we respect someone after being dead if when he was alive everyone hated him and disrespected him and ALSO wanted him dead? Plus, that kind of people don't give a shit about all the people they have killed and hurt during their whole dictatorship. so, karma is a bitch I guess?
I am never happy over someone's death - whoever it is. The loss of a life is always one too much.
Yet... I also do not condemn the person who shot that man. I can totally understand their celebration, who knows how much loved ones have been lost by the hands of that tyrant? I just wish there was a way there could have been vengeance for everyone - not just for the few people present. Hussein was hanged before a live audience, for example.
I agree, but I think it was "wrong" or counter productive to shot him when he was giving up and sets a bad example for the people who are taking over the country. It would have been better if they had not shot him and had a trial, even though he most likely would have been killed as a result of that anyway, it should have shown that the country was moving towards a better way of doing things. having said all that let me say Gadaffi was a shit and in my opinion humanity gains from his death.
@TheRenekruse like fuck they care about what you think or anyone else for that matter. for 40 years they have been under this slaughtering fuck.. you really think after that long in there head is gonna be 'well i hope everyone thinks were doing the right thing'... I'm pretty sure if someone killed ur family and everyone you knew. if you found them you'd take ur time with them. your all sooo unrealistic to how anyone would act in that situation
@SUUUPERDAN maybe you should read the comment and try to understand it befor you start running your mouth and dont project your own silly sub human nature onto me.
va enculer ta vieille reine qui vit au compte goutes d un serum , elle devait crever depuis que tu etais dans tes couches remplies de merde.pendant que cette vieille sorciere de ta pute reine joui de toute la richesse d un peuple debile que le tien , toi pendant se temps tu te bourre de cocaine et de biere , en trainant d un trottoire a l'autre , miserable. une gueule d un debile mental
I just don't see a point in insulting the dead. Insults are for people who can complain about them. Insulting the dead is like Nuking the enemy stronghold, easy and amusing but it is not nearly as fun or rewarding as crushing your enemies, seeing them driven before you, and to hearing the lamentations of their women.
@CMRDIvan It's not like the dead are going to mind. Like those guys who jumped out of the towers on 9/11, they don't mind if you point out the obvious fact that they should have been drinking Red Bull, because Red Bull gives you wings.
@Laughingblades They won't, but I'm a bit of troll, I enjoy the bit where they mind. Seriously though, the idea of an insult is to get someone, the person at which the insult is aimed, to react to said insult. How is it an insult if the dead can't react. My argument is that you literally can't insult the dead. You can joke and insult other people, but you can never actually insult someone who can't react to said insult.
Actually if Gaddafi was so bad,explain me why is Libya the most RICH country in Africa,most organized country in Africa and where people earn most of the money in Africa.Its is because of the same "dickhead" Gaddafi,who has been in power for 42 years and he brought Libya to what it was yesternday,a REAL country.
Yes I do support Gaddafi,actually I supported him,since he is long dead, but 80% of the ppl today in Libya,say,that it was better while Gaddafi was alive and they even started a rebelion
WukFanatic 3 days ago
why would you respect the dead? respect the living, the dead are beyond caring
5oodings 2 months ago
The lesson to take from this is that, ultimately, all dictators, and I mean all dictators will meet their Waterloo. But Kim il Jong seems to have survived that one. Hmmmn
tripware 2 months ago
@tripware well he dead now tchooo 8D.
theawesomebeliever 2 weeks ago
<3 gaddafi
Nothiean 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OK, but have YOU lived "under Gadaffi"?
Why do YOU pretend you know anything about it?!!
grozde 3 months ago
Bravo!
MJWHall 3 months ago
Are you being payed by Youtube yet?
megzieroe 4 months ago
I really like your videos :)
QueenOfr3d 4 months ago
Fuck dead people! Hahahaha
terminaldeity 4 months ago
you are crazyy lol
MajR 4 months ago
First video i have seen of you...fucking loved it! :) sub
MrMaxwell123456 4 months ago
According to Human Rights Watch between six and ten people were killed along with Gadaffi. Are we going to celebrate their summary executions too, I wonder? Do we even know who they were? Do we care? After all they were probably bastards too, eh? Nothing like summary justice. You know, Richard, perhaps the fact that you also are sitting there with *your* comfy western lifestyle in some way related to the fact that here we don't drag people out into the street and shoot them like a lynchmob.
InvincibleIronyMan 4 months ago
Normally support you.
But they sexually assaulted Gaddafi too before he was killed. I think they too far - if you look at Lybia's domestic policies, you'll see that they had it MUCH better off than those in Tunisia. And financially, they had better government welfare programs than those in Egypt.
Tunisia have done it much better. So did Egypt. They didn't need lynch black people or kill their former leaders on the spot.
ashfi1994 4 months ago
Hey Richard,
What do you call a potato with a penis?
...
A dictator.
hurrr
TJGuitarVids 4 months ago 18
@TJGuitarVids Think Dictato sounds funnier =p
EdolasNL 3 months ago
"Fuck dead people"
Ohhhhh yeaaaaaaa.
TheOJDrinker 4 months ago
There is nothing to celecrate about Gaddafi's death, he wasnt the worst dictator in the region, but was a pain in the arse to Western nations, and hence Tunesian rebels were paid to stir some shit in Lybia.
The ones the rule Lybia now are a nasty lot, they have been assasinating eachother well before Gaddafi was dead, and displayed the same behaviour we so badly criticised Gaddafi for during the attack on Sirte.
Also Hitler never had a grave.
MrNuserame 4 months ago
In a game of duck duck goose there's only a 2/3 chance he'd duck.
n008r4p3r 4 months ago
Yay!!! Sharia Law now reinstated in Libya. Also the legalization of polygamy. Brilliant, Yay NTC, Yay NATO Mercenaries.
MrBluerizlas 4 months ago
You've been watching too much "news". You really only have a small part of the story. He was whacked for profit. You won't find NATO overthrowing viscous dictators who cooperate with Western banks and oil companies.
fluffymcdeath 4 months ago
I only have a problem if it's the people here in their "ivory towers" start celebrating people's death. I think it's stupid, not disrespectful.
P3dotme 4 months ago
I'm quite fond of your accent.
Oh and I also agree with you.
lillinkluver23 4 months ago
It was amusing to see "Cover me in chocolate" on your shirt while you rocked to and fro.
On the matter of people celebrating the death of someone like that, I agree. They've earned that.
solublehermit 4 months ago
You know, I've only just got the pun in the title. I'm slow.
TheRantingBrit 4 months ago
Brilliantly done. Subscribed.
TheCobaltLion 4 months ago
Gadaffi mercilessly bombed the civilians of misrata promising to eradicate the city, women children the lot ,if he did that to my town and community , and loved ones , well to show him mercy in return , now that would take a saint.
woofalot13 4 months ago
Noise and more noise
journeytoislam 4 months ago
In 1951 Libya was the poorest country in the world. While under Gaddafi's rule, Libya became the most prosperous country in Africa. Search the Tripoli hearing in July where over a million people support Gadaffi. Then search for some anti-Gaddafi protests. You'll notice not too many people or videos for that matter. And now what once was a civilized nation is going to be ruled by Sharia Law.
IamLav 4 months ago
@IamLav - Not sure Gadffi can take credit for multi-national conglomerates discovering its oil reserves. I wonder how evenly distributed that wealth is among the people of Libya.
BNPfuhrer 4 months ago
@BNPfuhrer Eh, he used majority of the oil revenues for the people. They had free healthcare and free university. Loans were interest free and Libya had no debt.
IamLav 4 months ago
@IamLav - You’re still confusing 16 Universities with equality, claiming the NHS eradicated poverty & ill health and Muslim banking is interest free anyway. What about its human rights records, political prisoners and free speech?
BNPfuhrer 4 months ago
@IamLav Well at least a large enough portion of the Libyan population was enough pissed off at him to take over the country and kill him.
I'm not saying that everything will be all rainbows and butterflies in Libya from now on. I'm just saying that apparently he was quite unpopular in some circles. And considering that he apart from making education and healthcare available also killed and tortured a lot of people for nothing more than disagreeing with him it isn't hard to understand why.
DinMorsPimp 4 months ago
@DinMorsPimp Right. Well the reality is that he didn't kill too many people just for disagreeing with him. There were actually very few anti-Gaddafi protests going on, the western media just knows how to make a couple hundred people look like the entire nation. They've been using this type of propaganda for a long time. Search for Gadaffi's hearing in Tripoli during all of this. 1/3 of the entire nation gathers to support him.
IamLav 4 months ago
@IamLav Exactly how many people do you have to kill and torture for disagreeing with you would it take for it to be TOO many? Where I come from it would be one. One person would be too many. Of cause we don't have the death-penalty here but then again we probably would have, for all practical purposes, if we let the torture-murder-victims relatives make the arrests.
Do you think that it takes more Libyans than for example Danes to meet your definition of "too many"? Are Libyans worth less?
DinMorsPimp 4 months ago
@DinMorsPimp You're missing the point. Look at Libya now and what NATO has done to it. They also killed many more civilians than Gadaffi. Now, thousands more will suffer under a rebel state. How someone could justify this intervention is beyond me, the numbers don't add up.
IamLav 4 months ago
@IamLav - Media news coverage of Anti-Gadaffi pro-democracy protestors being killed in their hundreds is not propaganda. We miss the point because you have none, claiming a regime change may make things worse or waffling about free universities etc is no apology for violent murderous dictatorship.
BNPfuhrer 4 months ago
@BNPfuhrer Right. Well, the reality is, Gaddafi would have kept his people and country prospering. He was on the verge of changing his currency to gold called the African dinar. Not only was it going to prosper Libya but the entire north Africa. US didn't want that, England didn't want to pay in gold for their oil because they couldn't afford it, and France wanted a piece too.
IamLav 4 months ago
@BNPfuhrer On top of oil, France is also taking over their water system which is a huge intricate pipeline that supplied 70% of Libyans with free water. Well, not after NATO bombed the pipes which take months to repair, and then bombed the pipeline factory a day later. All in all, Libya is now FUCKED.
Oh and, please find me some videos of anti-Gadaffi protests. I've only been able to find videos of a couple hundred to thousand people, while Gadaffi has gathered over a million.
IamLav 4 months ago
@IamLav "All in all, Libya is now FUCKED"
Go make feeble excuses for Gadaff’s dictatorship to Libya’s political prisoners imprisoned & tortured or to the families of demonstrators killed.
"please find me some videos of anti-Gadaffi protests"
watch?v=EyF2QLqz3-s
BNPfuhrer 4 months ago
@BNPfuhrer Lol, great video link. Is that the best you can do? Search for Gaddafi's hearing in Tripoli. You will see over a MILLION people gathered. Unlike the video you link which shows merely hundreds. That's practically NOTHING. The entire country will now go to shit. The interest free Libyan bank under Gaddafi's rule has been shut down and they've already implemented a rebel bank.
IamLav 4 months ago
@IamLav "Lol, great video link"
Nice to see how Gadaffi’s forces shooting peaceful demonstrators creates derision of laughter from you, you’re nothing more than an apologist for a terrorist murderous dictator. Oh and the new Libyan Sharia banking system is also interest free, mongo.
BNPfuhrer 4 months ago
@IamLav yes the majority of the people supported Gadaffi , that is untill the NATO started using the media as a weapon, now we have some obscure rebel movement in power that wants Sharia law in practice, great fucking improvement, power to the people? lmao yea right, well let's see how the think about that in 6 months eh.
Barre76 4 months ago
@IamLav This video and my comments are not trying to JUSTIFY the NATO INTERVENTION.
What Coughlan said in the video and I said in my comment is that given he after all was (among other things) a murderous dictator it is understandable that some of the people in Libya would want to kill Gaddafi.
I'm not saying that everything will be better now. I'm not even saying that it won't be worse now. And I'm not suggesting that problems don't usually result when the West meddle in other peoples wars.
DinMorsPimp 4 months ago
@DinMorsPimp Except the fact that there wasn't a war to begin with. Majority of it was media propaganda, I know Libyans in my neighbourhood personally that have family IN Libya who say there is no uprising. There was definitely an "Arab spring" as they call it, but it was rather insignificant in Libya. Democracy means the majority rule, and the majority of Libyans were happy with their current situation. I suggest you do some research into why NATO intervened.
IamLav 4 months ago
@IamLav Ok then.
But I get the feeling that we are not talking about the same thing. You are still talking about the NATO intervention and I'm ONLY saying that it is understandable that some people would want to see Gaddafi dead. Those two things aren't mutually exclusive are they? NATO could have fucked it up big time in a country where the majority of people didn't want change while there still would be some people in Libya who wanted to kill Gadddafi for being a murderous dictator. Right?
DinMorsPimp 4 months ago
@DinMorsPimp Ok. Yes, quite a lot of people wanted Gaddafi dead, but they are now much worse off after the NATO intervention. Gaddafi was a bad man, but he still prospered his country from being the poorest in the world to the richest in Africa.
IamLav 4 months ago
@IamLav How do you mean "mutch worse off after the NATO intervention"
The guy was freaking murdering everybody who deared to go outside and openly (and peacefully) wanted him to step down!
And BTW peace has returned since Ghaddafi's death. Yes, the situation is rather unstable, but its nothing like Iraq.
wybo2 4 months ago
@wybo2 Sigh. No, that's what your corporate media has told you. NATO killed many more civilians than Gaddafi did. What Gaddafi should have done was held a democratic election instead of shooting at rebel forces. Also, do you know how many people the rebels killed? Hundreds of Gaddafi's soldiers were slaughtered and tortured to death. Go on, find me these "anti-Gaddafi" protests. Search up "Tripoli Gaddafi speech july 1st" and see how many supporters he had.
IamLav 4 months ago
@IamLav Im glad you shared that OPINION by supporting credible evidence.
Dude get real with the facts and figures before you talk bullshit...
steveyissocoollike 4 months ago
@IamLav We were talking about today, you claimed people in Libya were worse off than before the intervention, I said that was BS. And ofcourse, people were better off at peace than in war-times, but there was war when the intervention began and peace has returned since it ended. We can only hope that it stays that way and doesn't end up in ethnic cleansing (like in Iraq).
"What Gaddafi should have done was held a democratic election instead of shooting at rebels" Couldn't agree more
wybo2 4 months ago
@wybo2 Ethnic cleansing had began as soon as the rebels were armed by NATO. They killed, tortured, and kicked out thousands of black Libyans. The rest of Africa, including Libya loved Gaddafi, they saw him as their "saviour." He was on the verge of prospering the entire Northern Africa with his currency switch to the "African Dinar" which is a currency backed by gold. The rebels have already implemented Sharia law, it's definitely not going to get better. In reality, there was no "uprising."
IamLav 4 months ago
@IamLav "In reality, there was no "uprising.""
yea, you're right, I was Naive. The overtrowing of the dictators in Egypt and Tunisia was most obviously a shill to control the population as well....
wybo2 4 months ago
@wybo2 No. There are plenty of videos and articles showing the amount of supporters Gaddafi had. I encourage you to find me similar vids/links of Mubarak supporters.
IamLav 4 months ago
@IamLav "I encourage you to find me similar vids/links of Mubarak supporters"
/watch?v=wpNbRu6nYsc&feature=related
In case the videotitle is lying (I don't understand arabic)
/watch?v=5vtuTBMOvZ8
wybo2 4 months ago
@IamLav Ps, are the people of Syria, Yemen and Bahrain rising up? Awnser me now, cus something tells me you will deny that if the west would intervene one day.
wybo2 4 months ago
@wybo2 Well the protests in Yemen and Bahrain actually exist. As far as Syria goes, there are protesters on both sides and it's a fairly even split. The opposition is killing just as many people as the police forces. Most of these weapons are coming from Israel. Then there's (western) media propaganda which only focuses on the opposition, inevitably brainwashing its viewers who use the internet for entertainment and tv for news. What a twisted world we live in.
IamLav 4 months ago
@IamLav The western media? I get most of my news from Al Jazeera(english) mate. Ps, I wouldn't trust a regime that bans all journalists other than from its own government controlled newsstation.
wybo2 4 months ago
@wybo2 Al Jazeera? No wonder your views on Libya are so skewed. Qatar owns Al Jazeera. Qatar also has an American military base. They were also the second country to recognize the rebel forces. This was right after they were cut an oil deal btw. Not to mention that they also sent war planes to Libya. If you haven't figured out that Al Jazeera is pro-American then you are lost.
IamLav 3 months ago
@IamLav
Come watch Aljazeera in Arabic and see the amount of negativity there is towards America.
Just because Aljazeera and most Arabs see eye to eye that Gadaffi and some dictators should be removed does not make them pro-American or Anti-american.
We disagree with certain American policies and thats about it and the English Aljazeera is a waterd down censored version made for your sensitive eyes.
selfsenter 3 months ago
@IamLav Sorry but "Its a fairly even split"?!
Did you pay ANY attention to anything? The loyalist protesters didn't even gather en masse until late this summer, yet there've been opposition protests since last January. As a matter of fact, you are WRONG.
Keinlicht 3 months ago
@Keinlicht What protests? Find me some links please.
IamLav 3 months ago
Wow, I couldn't finish this video because of your idiotic babbling. You must be one lonely fish.
mercury4metal 4 months ago
why didnt gadafi duck.... answer: 9x19mm PARA muzzle velocity = 350m/s
MRWALKER500000 4 months ago
fucking sheeple corpses always following the crowd, i was dead before it was popular- Australopithecus hipster
OppositionDept 4 months ago
Now that he's dead, can we decide how to spell his fucking name?
tctheunbeliever 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
he who is without sin, cast the first stone
variolaa 4 months ago
Well, that totally made sense.
Don't see how anyone could really disagree with you. Good video :)
stoikr 4 months ago
North Korea Best Korea!!!
hejie23 4 months ago
i agree that he was better dead than alive but he should have been put on trial, he got out easy, plus the nato forces were quite clearly going beyond their mission brief to 'protect civilians' during most of the campaign
redskin133 4 months ago
@redskin133 If he had been put on trial he would have lived longer, and either been given a life sentence (a huge mercy for the fucker) or executed, which happened anyway. He deserved the horrible death he got - he deserved it a thousand times over.
Sauron012 4 months ago
Was Gaddafi genuinely unpopular among the people in Libya? The rebels were doomed until intervention from Great Britain, France and the US and still it took inordinately long time to get him. This could tell us the rebels were not exactly that popular. Looks nothing more than 1 dictator is being swapped for another, which is not something to celebrate.
BNPfuhrer 4 months ago
I think it's a bit disrespectful but you're right. I couldn't stop laughing when you said, "the only thing you have to do to ensure you one day die is be alive!"
maysiemoo1999 4 months ago
I usualy think you are a dick. cos you are. but this time I agree with you.
Crestote 4 months ago
Your reaction? Testicles
xIntoThePitx 4 months ago
LMAO
ProjectTrapdoor 4 months ago
Why edit or delete comments? What's the deal dude?
shaggie07 4 months ago
Gaddafi ducked plenty of times, but the Zionist stomping Golem, USA, under control of the jeduhi, holocausted Libya anyway. Zionists out of government.
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
Wow this video is actually perfect, I might start watching you again.
Viktir666 4 months ago
Here about the Warner Brothers cartoon?
It features Ghadaffi Duck and Fugs Funny.
VoxNeruda 4 months ago
Actually, this is one of your best...
threewing 4 months ago
Looks like Jamie Oliver has really let himself go
MrCJftw 4 months ago
This is the best video I've seen by the dick, i agree 100%
noxtimor 4 months ago
Relax
MediumNothinFull 4 months ago
Lol who cares! We are still all slaves to the system!
Bateone 4 months ago
It's funny you say you're not gonna judge and that people shouldn't judge from their ivory tower and then go on a judgmental rampage. Gaddafi wasn't that bad actually. Sure he killed some of his own people. What country hasn't done that? Atleast he provided free electricity, health care, houses and all that. You can't say that about any other country in the world.
member5738 4 months ago
@member5738 Just like Stalin wasn't a bad guy too for giving his people food, housing, and education, right?
ZachLeclerc 4 months ago
@ZachLeclerc
Was that free? No. So why spill lies?
member5738 4 months ago
@member5738
"Was that free? No. So why spill lies?"
What are you talking about? Soviet Russia gave people rationed food, no individual owned land, and free education was accessible to citizens of the USSR. It was a communist state, remember? What lies am I spilling?
Gaddafi oppressed the Libyan people, why do you think they revolted against him?
ZachLeclerc 4 months ago
What the hell is under your eye?
shilbacker 4 months ago
@shilbacker sexiness
isaveu 4 months ago
Not judgemental? Dare I mention all of the shit you gave to thunderfoot?
Jackass
JezzasCT 4 months ago
@JezzasCT I said im not usually a judgmental guy but what the hell do my videos about thunderf00t have to do with being judgemental, I judged him based on the things he repeatedly said and did.
Retard
Coughlan616 4 months ago 15
@Coughlan616 I like thunderf00t but nothing is above criticism
He went a bit too far and needed someone to take him off his golden chair
<3
OppositionDept 4 months ago
@JezzasCT Ever heard the saying "don't judge a book by it's cover"? Well it's "don't judge a book by it's cover" not "don't judge a book by it's content".
stooge389 4 months ago
Richard, you give honest drug takers a bad name
Rockster969 4 months ago 8
@Rockster969 well, boo hooo
BeachlessIsland 2 weeks ago
some fags still on line O_o...bunch of fucktartes ,,,,cheers ...
riptriper 4 months ago
Your weird :s
JaffaToTheMAX 4 months ago
I hate to be the guy who points this out, but there are more people alive today, than have ever been alive... ever. I said I hate to be that guy, but I lied. I loved it.
ThatHeathenAtheist 4 months ago
@myY0UTUBEchanneI
No impact on brits? The guy funded terrorists attacking the UK for god knows how long, not impacted eh?
MitchofSmeg 4 months ago
If you condone murderous thugs parading their victims before a cheering crowd in the moments before a humiliating execution just because we have not walked a mile in their shoes, where is the line to be drawn then? When is it not acceptable to treat another human this way?
dpe4 4 months ago
@dpe4
When the person paraded is a mass murdering fuckhead well.....
I guess you dont support what the italians did to Mussolini then? They killed him and hung him up for all to see, 1 lady shot his corpse 5 times and many spat on him as they went by. I guess you are against that too?
MitchofSmeg 4 months ago
@MitchofSmeg Calm down. I'm asking a simple question. Where do you draw the line?
dpe4 4 months ago
@dpe4
Kind of an obvious 1 that, it depends on the situation
MitchofSmeg 4 months ago
@MitchofSmeg Ok. We have to be careful though. A person in my neighborhood tortured and killed another - retalitory gang violence. Individual interpretation of this important issue would lead to societal chaos.
dpe4 4 months ago
@dpe4
Mate i am bisexual, i am scared of that shit happening to me just for that simple fact, so i get what you are saying, obviously on the small scale side, not acceptable, on to top level (ie mass murderers who are known as it) generally, i wouldnt blink twice for them.
MitchofSmeg 4 months ago
@MitchofSmeg Fair enough...
dpe4 4 months ago
Wanna tissue you sound like your gonna cry you fucking buck tooth cunt
owaiinj 4 months ago
gaDAFFI DUCK you say?
hal970fx 4 months ago
Honestly I don't think we should kill people like this these are the kinda people you should very much so should lock up for the rest of their life why death is too good for them . You kill these people and view it as a punishment I sure the fuck don't what the fuck do they care they are dead they can't feel anything anymore.
darkdragonsoul99 4 months ago
@myY0UTUBEchanneI over nothing? you mean a dictator that terrorirsed his own people for 42 years? he's making a point you sad bastard, and has opinions. unlike you, who has a channel full of "favourites."
MonaLisaNaked 4 months ago
Comment removed
MonaLisaNaked 4 months ago
NAIL. HEAD.
touprism 4 months ago
Ahaha i like
TheeSuperJazzer 4 months ago
lol the funny thing is I agree with this video 110% so aint offended one little bit !!!
ChrissyboyH44 4 months ago 14
Thank you for making this video. It put my views on the issue all in one video. I have seen some real retards when it comes to this. One idiot on TJ's vid seriously said, "what about the constitution?"
tubes17 4 months ago
Oh yeah, and that one where you encourage people to blow themselves up, not your best moment...
halycyon1234 4 months ago
This is by far NOT your most offensive video. In fact, I completely agree with you on this one. Your most offensive videos by far are that one about abortion... and constantly calling Christian blacks Uncle Toms. Very, Very offensive,taboo and just plain false.
halycyon1234 4 months ago
Because then you'll be a mile away and you'll have their shoes.
edwdixon5 4 months ago
When HItler died I had an extra scoop of ice cream.
edwdixon5 4 months ago
Haha!
oscarmania56 4 months ago
George bush was the biggest terrist of them all. And the biggest ever terorist act in history was huroshima and nagasaki
MOSK8T 4 months ago
4:19 Food... FEWD. Golly, almost forgot about that fancy accent! :)
Anonymous247n 4 months ago
No point splitting hairs or looking for the one grey cloud in the sky....I agree!
JustB3NJI 4 months ago
i have aypthmany with ghaddafi, he was a real leader, whoever celebrated a death of anyone is digusting!
ThinkingAgent12 4 months ago
Capachino stain on his face lol
GiZM0oGaMingx 4 months ago
I have every sympathy with the people. I can understand why they humiliated Gadaffi and beat him before his death. I was kind of pleased they did it. It would have been good for their cause however if they had captured him and put him on trial. Even if it was just a show trial. They could have still sentenced him to death but have the added joy of parading him to the World.
19822andy 4 months ago 2
hihihihihihhihihihi coughlan fahk u buddie. u is gay? i see u doodle boppa like men cuz u support them. lolly dollz
imyouranonymous 4 months ago
"Cover me in Chocolate" lol
klila16 4 months ago
@klila16 You don't see the last bit "and throw me to the lesbians."
Pushtrak 4 months ago
I think they should have him stuffed and propped up somewhere.
ravenslaves 4 months ago
Lol 3:15 I:
theSkittlelover101 4 months ago
Comment removed
theSkittlelover101 4 months ago
i actually heard a conspiracy nut try to say that Gadaffi was a great man who gave his people free healthcare and gold and was loved by all,and that the US was painting white people brown and sending them overseas to destabilize the country...the saddest part is that i've heard so many fucking conspiracies like this,i can no longer tell if the person was joking or not.
warpedwiselegoman 4 months ago
Tens of millions of Americans will cheer when Bush1 ans Bush2 die.
Desertphile 4 months ago
There were couple hundred people celebrating in the streets up the road from me in Rusholme that night... the only problem I had with it was that at first I thought they were protesting.
grungeface87 4 months ago
Gadaffi didnt know the 5 D's
MitchofSmeg 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Fuck dead people!" hahaha
grungeface87 4 months ago
I feel sorry for Khaddafi's cosmetic surgeon. His income has now been cut by about 80%. How will he earn a crust now/
TomleysUrn 4 months ago
Except Qaddafi couldn't have been executed without NATO's help from the air. I don't think there was a "special situation" those anonymous accessories to assasination found themselves in. I think they enjoyed Western comforts with no experience of living under a "guy like that" or "walking in the shoes" of those who have Which means Fidel Castro putting Batista's torturers to the wall watered the tree of Cuban liberty. :)
TheAzov 4 months ago
Well I am glad the fucker is dead, but as a westerner I am not going to jump up and down or dance in the streets. I can understand why the Libyans are happy, but this in no way shape or form gets rid of terrorism, evil, totalitarianism, and stops new fucktards like Gadaffi, Sadam, Stalin, or Hitler from coming into power.
Hotleather31 4 months ago
Sadam's sons were viiile. but they died fighting. That fucking sucks.
AAAhmed46 4 months ago
Yesterday there was a large group of Libyans by city hall and they were so ecstatic! They were dancing and cheering and stuff. I found it kind of morbid, but I don't really know about this guy. He must have really been one hell of an asshole if people are that happy about his death!
CMO999 4 months ago
I love it.
Stonegolem42 4 months ago
Regardless of what anyone does in life, once they are dead nothing else matters hence respect the dead, do the dna check or whatever and bury him somewhere secret, those rebels are mindless fucks and shot him when he was clearly not a threat anymore, revenge isn't a good thing to have and whoever shot him is a murderer
hellothereboyo 4 months ago
@hellothereboyo I raped Gaddafis ass after he was dead TEN TIMES
AssRapistSeeksBumBoy 4 months ago
@hellothereboyo That doesn't make a lick of sense.
Stonegolem42 4 months ago
Was saying the very same thing yesterday at work to my work mates Mr Coughlan...
ElroyHarvey 4 months ago
I am often disappointed when people attempt to enhance their opinion and make it more valid by the extensive use of profanity. It just undermines and marginalises anything worthwhile they have to say. Intelligent people with valid arguments just don't need to use it. You don't get Richard Dawkins calling the Pope a cunt. The word 'fuck' is so commonplace it's almost without meaning. Better to be articulate. Profanity IMHO is counter productive. Think about it cocksuckers.
mrrkkemp 4 months ago
I bet these people who say respect the dead, are the same people who always have negative things to say about Adolf Hitler.
Texemosis 4 months ago
fuck dead people? you know you want to, coughlan? ;)
Ziggie1o1 4 months ago
Comment removed
Ziggie1o1 4 months ago
you've got a nice point there, why would we respect someone after being dead if when he was alive everyone hated him and disrespected him and ALSO wanted him dead? Plus, that kind of people don't give a shit about all the people they have killed and hurt during their whole dictatorship. so, karma is a bitch I guess?
fernandopox 4 months ago
You're wrong about more people being dead than alive.right now there are more people alive now that all of human history put toghter.
kokofan50 4 months ago
I am never happy over someone's death - whoever it is. The loss of a life is always one too much.
Yet... I also do not condemn the person who shot that man. I can totally understand their celebration, who knows how much loved ones have been lost by the hands of that tyrant? I just wish there was a way there could have been vengeance for everyone - not just for the few people present. Hussein was hanged before a live audience, for example.
But I guess being shot in the sewers will do too.
laflugantabastardo 4 months ago
Too much fucking
TheBarbian 4 months ago
If you unblock me I'll buy some dick-wear!
GhostOfMisterRogers 4 months ago
Fuck you ded grandmom
boyboyboy5335 4 months ago
Why did you block me? I can't help I was born retarded
GhostOfMisterRogers 4 months ago
I agree, but I think it was "wrong" or counter productive to shot him when he was giving up and sets a bad example for the people who are taking over the country. It would have been better if they had not shot him and had a trial, even though he most likely would have been killed as a result of that anyway, it should have shown that the country was moving towards a better way of doing things. having said all that let me say Gadaffi was a shit and in my opinion humanity gains from his death.
TheRenekruse 4 months ago
@TheRenekruse like fuck they care about what you think or anyone else for that matter. for 40 years they have been under this slaughtering fuck.. you really think after that long in there head is gonna be 'well i hope everyone thinks were doing the right thing'... I'm pretty sure if someone killed ur family and everyone you knew. if you found them you'd take ur time with them. your all sooo unrealistic to how anyone would act in that situation
SUUUPERDAN 4 months ago
@SUUUPERDAN maybe you should read the comment and try to understand it befor you start running your mouth and dont project your own silly sub human nature onto me.
TheRenekruse 4 months ago
Dooooooddddddddgggeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!
GardnerJunior18 4 months ago
va enculer ta vieille reine qui vit au compte goutes d un serum , elle devait crever depuis que tu etais dans tes couches remplies de merde.pendant que cette vieille sorciere de ta pute reine joui de toute la richesse d un peuple debile que le tien , toi pendant se temps tu te bourre de cocaine et de biere , en trainant d un trottoire a l'autre , miserable. une gueule d un debile mental
contrelesidiots 4 months ago
your some moany prick
ciaran112233 4 months ago
I just don't see a point in insulting the dead. Insults are for people who can complain about them. Insulting the dead is like Nuking the enemy stronghold, easy and amusing but it is not nearly as fun or rewarding as crushing your enemies, seeing them driven before you, and to hearing the lamentations of their women.
CMRDIvan 4 months ago
@CMRDIvan It's not like the dead are going to mind. Like those guys who jumped out of the towers on 9/11, they don't mind if you point out the obvious fact that they should have been drinking Red Bull, because Red Bull gives you wings.
Laughingblades 4 months ago 15
@Laughingblades They won't, but I'm a bit of troll, I enjoy the bit where they mind. Seriously though, the idea of an insult is to get someone, the person at which the insult is aimed, to react to said insult. How is it an insult if the dead can't react. My argument is that you literally can't insult the dead. You can joke and insult other people, but you can never actually insult someone who can't react to said insult.
CMRDIvan 4 months ago
@CMRDIvan :) I think most people use insults to vent their frustrations or express their distaste for a person or what a person did.
But It's best when the limiter breaks, those are the insults to cherish hehehe.
Laughingblades 4 months ago