Added: 4 years ago
From: LadyAmaltheaUnicorn
Views: 290,489
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,341)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • who's the singer?

  • @Alicerox14

    Charlotte Church; did all the singing for the soundtrack

  • 26 people don't like heresy

  • She was truly a hero.

  • was not the first world changing human being to be destroyed by religion(cults/herd mindset), nor the last

  • @sTapleEVA Joan was burnt alive by the English. They are like that. 

  • @swanningaround right, by the christian english

  • @sTapleEVA By the evil English sounds more correct.

  • @swanningaround but the thing is, it was by the christian english. this is a documented fact. it is historicly documented that the christian religion or atleast the church has lead to millions of murder/genocide accounts, as well as ruining litteraly billions of lives, and shortening life spans.

  • @sTapleEVA I agree with you The reason for Joan's death was that the English hated her personally. The Catholic religion was used as a pretext to have her burnt. I think you know that.

  • @swanningaround the english CHRISTIANS. my point was not that it was the english, but the english christians. heresy was the charge for her death, not war charges

  • this is a very nyc video...its really very helpfull as i am studing about joan...

    joan we miss,after all you were the one who saved france.

  • Merci Jeanne d'avoir bouter hors de France Les Rosbeefs avec l'Epée de Charles Martel, merci à tes Frêres d'Armes et Chers Compagnons du premier Jour tes Fidèles "Armagnacs" et merci aux Frêres Ecossais venu combattre à tes côtés l'ennemi de toujours l'Anglais, reviens Jeanne la France est en Danger, nos politiques bradent ceux qui ont fait notre nation, bafouent leurs mémoires, leurs vies données et sacrifices

  • I understand now how the ink can be poisonous. The text is NOT GOD. Not even close

  • may all of these bastards burn in hell, for all of the pain they caused to so many, who werent even witches, and even for those who were, for thier thinking that they were Holierthan others, and for thier hatefilled vindictive nasty judgements upon others. Let thier judgments fall upon themselves. Religion is the pit of vermin made of menkind's judgments upon others. MAY GOD HAVE MERCY ON YE. I, WILL NOT! EVER

  • Can someone please find original soundtrack from this scene?

  • In July 1429 Joan of Arc had led a French army to lay seige for 4 days to the town of Troyes in Ch-Ardenne ( which was under English rule). Joans army was running out of food but fortunately, months earlier, there had been a wandering Friar; Brother Richard, who had been preaching that the world would end.For some strange reason the residents had responded by planting early beans. These happened to be ready and so the army ate them. Did the residents hope to climb up bean stalks to heaven ?

  • humankind has issues. The fire used for evil.

  • Comment removed

  • Jeanne 600 years since you left us, we never forget you. FUCKING ROAST BEEF

  • Comment removed

  • hey hey the french in the hundred year war were f##king brutal to

  • Comment removed

  • i dont get it if you were taking france back then why wouldnt you speak french while your doing it or why wasnt the entire thing french kinda makes it more realistic

  • The holy catholic church is the best church, movies lies !!

  • At least the Church did the right thing in the end and washed her record, proclaiming her innocence and stating that she was a saint for her sacrifice

  • I'm confused, Did Joan denounce and deny her faith or what?

    And for those who are bashing Christians, shame on you, we are the corrupted ones? No, look in the mirror yourselves. But, if our God is for us, who could ever stand against? Truly, you will be faced with God.

  • @slputt She sighed away her visions and voices as heresy (saying she made them up) you see heresy was only a death sentence if you were a repeat offender so by confessing to heresy she was spared death and sentenced to life in prison this satisfied the Church but not the English there are different versions of how we did it but we got her to wear mens clothes again which was heresy making her a repeat offender and forcing a death sentence.

  • @tribetng So she couldn't be a martyr, as i have heard....

  • @slputt Sorry, i don't get what you mean. 

  • @tribetng oh i didn't mean to be mad or mean about it (sorry if it came out that way) i was just a litttle on the confused side what really happened (i didn't mean to take it out on you, or blame you or anything) The info was helpful, thank you (which i should have said in the first place) :)

  • @slputt No prob, i suppose your right, technically she's not a traditional martyr because she didn't choose to die rather then give up or renounce her faith (if I've got martyrdom wrong i apologise) she died because she and the church were backed into a corner. She did however renounce her confession before she died saying her voices were real and came from God and she had been tricked into denying them.

  • @tribetng okie dokie, thanks for theclear up!

  • @tribetng Also, 99% of the catholics take it as a religion and does good deeds blindly. 1% of them knows its an order, and does good deeds knowing that they can gain more in return.

  • i watched this in social studies... thght i'd hate it... surprisingly i liked it O.e

  • this doesnt surprise me. the wickedness and corruption of christianity knows no bounds.

  • @Grunt922 It has nothing to do with christianity, its the people who exploits it by using it as a power source. There are good people and bad people, and just because a few bad guys uses christianity for power does not make christianity evil. But it does make the rest of the other christians silent, which makes christianity look bad.

  • @Jake4595 a few...? lol you should pick up a history book. every 100-250 years theres a psychopath who kills thousands by "exploiting" the ignorance of people who blindly follow a book written by men. lets just name a few. spanish inquisitions, the crusaders, world war 2 because hitler thought he was the hand of god, the dark ages set humans back hundreds of years causing millions to die from simple diseases, and the bubonic plague era when thousands ravaged lands in the name of "god"

  • @Grunt922 I wasn't talking about the fanatics who believed in a religion too much to the point where they think they are doing heaven's work on earth. I was talking about people who knew what christianity was and used it for power to gain advantage over others(particularly the lower class). I am ofcourse talking about the popes and imams and other leaders who get their power through religions. Get what i mean? Btw, the history book is just organized knowledge that people agree on it to be true.

  • @Jake4595 It is true that historically, religious authority has been used to opress

  • @soulsearcha I know, the catholics. Noticed how their rules and laws are always targeted at the poor and telling them how to be a person while the Rich fuck multiple women and avoids justice? << This is an example of why religions are nothing but an order that uses the words of the prophets and edits it into their own words then made a book & exploits it to keep the poor/lower class from rebelling, and for power under unification of belief. Same goes for Islam and others, I'm a christian though

  • @Jake4595 If the catholic church is as scummy as you believe, then why are they one of the largest contributors to charity in the world, to the extent that they were thanked by the UN, also, were is any evidence that the high ranking people in the church do as you accuse? And why have they let numerous sects of Christianity form that offer different viewpoints and ideas? your argument is pretty shit

  • @humgerguty2 Haha, your response was also pretty shit. You should see what they've done rather than see how much money they give out, which were money from the people. They give money so that they can get good reputation.

  • @Jake4595 you don't know your facts at all

  • @humgerguty2 Is that your response? I dont know my facts? Sounds like an average christian to me, but since i am a christian myself i wont harass you any further. But understand this, catholics was used as an order to keep the people under order so the holder of the book can have power, this is called religion, and islam was formed in the same manners, all descended from the prophets.

  • @Jake4595 I have not seen you quote a single source, or support your argument, therefore I cannot accept your argument as being valid.

  • @humgerguty2 If all of your knowledge is from quotes that people made from the past then, well, what can i say? LOL.

    heres a quote from ya "And God said the bible is but a manmade tool to convert the people to an order, or religion as they call it" - Jake4595

    Does that support me now? lolol

    If you rely on quotes from the past for evidence then you will never see the quote of the future.

    Therefore you block your own mind out of the world, including the kingdom of heaven

  • @Jake4595 just go away, you are making no sense what so ever, or presenting a legitimate argument, just your crappy opinion.

  • @humgerguty2 "just go away, you are making no sense what so ever, or presenting a legitimate argument, just your crappy opinion" - The dumbass said

    "humgerguty2 is a dumb jackass who picks an argument with people but then tells them to go away when he can't understand his own ignorance" - Augustus Lucieno Heinzwen

    Need i say more? Lolol i guess this proves that you are a dumbass now that i've found a quote of it(which you consider evidence)

  • @Jake4595 ye could repeat that so & so is a dumbass another 100k times, and each time ye do, ye own insecurities are more assuredly affirmed.

  • @MystSilverDragon Who are you? i was simply tackling back at that humgerguty2 guy because of how he said I cant be right just because i dont have quotes or phrases to back me up. So i 'found' a quote that said he is a dumbass, and so i was telling the truth because i have a quote, and that means i have evidence. see what i did? I'm sure he will know since he is so logical and reasonable. Unless you are him using a different account, then that is pretty much a comedy to me.

  • @Jake4595 and ive no idea what ye original opinion stated. didnt have to know.

  • @Jake4595 it is 100 % clear to me that ye have not watched this vid, nor pondered the point of this vid at all.

  • @MystSilverDragon Actually i have, and my opinion is that catholic churches, along with all the other religions, are just an order to keep the people under control. Religions exploits the very prophets by using their words as crowd controls.

  • @Jake4595 **and my opinion is that catholic churches, along with all the other religions, are just an order to keep the people under control. Religions exploits the very prophets by using their words as crowd controls.

    ***

    and I can not disagree with that at all, never have & never will.

  • @MystSilverDragon In fact, JESUS would agree that religion is nothing more than menkind controlling one another. It is as HE said all along. it was the religious self-righteous pharisees in fact who put JESUS CHRIST to death as well....& who were the ones who he had the most to say against...somthing to ponder

  • @Jake4595 Yes I did pick an argument with you, but now that I see that you have not put any evidence or thought into your argument, and are using childish tactics to try and make me look like a fool, as well as being a complete wanker, I do want you to go away because you are simply humiliating yourself

  • @humgerguty2 So do i have to act like a complete sheep-head and rely only on words that are made by people in order for me to not be childish?Its an irony how you said childish,if you see it from my point of view,but i doubt you will since you are too "logical and reasonable" for such argument. Its funny how the comment you just wrote completely describes what i think when i read your comments.

    And tell me, how am i not logical & humiliating myself?just because i dont use quotes to back me up?

  • @Jake4595 You are not logical as you are spouting off opinions, without putting any thought or evidence whatsoever into formulating them, making you an idiot. Furthermore, pretty much everyone hates you now in the comments because you are being a complete arsehole, and yes you need evidence to back up any argument if you want to have a debate with somebody, something that you don't have, and that does not mean that you have to be a sheep.

  • @humgerguty2

    Had to give my 2 cents...

    yes, the RCC does a lot of good things, but that does not excuse all the horrible things they condone; such as withholding information about pedophiles from secular authorities as well as moving these pedos to different perishes, allowing them to continue raping new children; they also forbid birth control, one of the best preventives of poverty and to top it off, they still hold extremely sexist views on authority

  • @LadyAmaltheaUnicorn firstly, they don't like birth control as it blocks/kills life and they believe that all life is sacred. Secondly, they don't hold sexist views on society, they don't allow women to become priests as priests are carriers of god's word, like the disciples, and none of them were women. Finally They moved the pedos around to stop them from abusing children, but ironically made it worse, not intentionally though, there your argument is now invalid.

  • @humgerguty2

    part 1....

    see, that's exactly what I mean. They have a very myopic view about life that has extremely detrimental consequences that lead to unnecessary suffering; around 16-19,000 children die of starvation everyday, alone, mostly because their parents could not afford to take care of them, but at the same time, were forbidden to use BC because of religious dogma.

  • @LadyAmaltheaUnicorn Then that is the fault of the people from not exercising self control and not having so much sex. The church says that BC does block/kill life so then they do not condone or agree with it, however, it does not stop people from simply not having sex and producing the babies, and exercising self control.

  • @humgerguty2

    That's a very myopic position, since not all people feel the same way towards sex and the development zygotes resulting from it.

    As far as I'm concerned, religion needs to stick to theology and not poke its nose into what consenting adults do with their body in the privacy of their homes

  • @LadyAmaltheaUnicorn This is theology, as it comes under the churches interpenetration of the bible, and the meanings that they can gain from it. Furthermore, if you can't use contraception, then it does not stop you from simply not having sex, and using your common sense.

  • @humgerguty2

    part 2...

    you're describing sexism in a nutshell while denying that it's sexism at all. The idea that you need a penis to govern or have contact with some sort of supernatural higher power is absurd and offensive.

    But than again, I believe religions are created by men, so it only made sense that men are the superior gender

  • @LadyAmaltheaUnicorn You are missing the point entirely here. They don't allow women priests because Jesus chose men as his first priests and disciples, therefore they stick to this even today, to uphold Jesus' decision, and as tradition. However, the church has at no point made any official statement, or holds any bias against women in society. Furthermore, at the time of the founding of Christianity, women were very prominent in religion, so men were not the superior gender then.

  • @humgerguty2

    I get what you're saying, but you have to understand where I'm coming from as a skeptic, which is I view religions as man made constructs, so I do realize why men as the "chosen" ones within these beliefs. However, the Abrahamic faiths paint women into a very demeaning way, unlike a lot of other mythologies from the past that viewed the feminine in a more positive light.

    In the 3 religions of Abraham, women are created to breed and shut up, nothing more

  • @LadyAmaltheaUnicorn Yes, but those are not really being exercised today actively by the church for a variety of reasons, such as social pressure, and an outrage if that happened. However when it comes to appointing priests, the church has to abide by Jesus' teaching, otherwise there is not point in being religious at all

  • @LadyAmaltheaUnicorn You should read about the prophetess Deborah in the book of Judges (Christian Bible). I cannot speak for other faiths, but Christainity should never teach a misogynistic message, but a harmony of equal but different genders serving God and each other.

    Human kind has been using thoughts (religious or not) as a right to power over the seemingly week for eons. A true leader, Spiritual or Political should serve people not oppress them. Humans always wants rule never to serve.

  • @humgerguty2

    part 3....

    how does moving the pedophiles to new parishes prevent them from abusing children? The simple fact is, it doesn't. They move them because they did not want to go public with what was occurring in the church, which would have sullied their reputation.

    The acts of these pedos is a criminal offense and thus, they should have been handed over to the police. You just do not shelter dangerous people, especially those who harm children, this is reprehensible

  • @LadyAmaltheaUnicorn They moved the paedophiles around to stop them from assaulting children in the area, and to move them away. This was a mistake on the churches part I agree, but it they did not do it to make the situation intentionally worse. Yes they have had cover-ups, and that is a bad thing however, what organisation would want a scandal on their hands? Finally, criminal charges have been given to priests over paedophilia since the 80's, so no one is sheltering or protecting them.

  • @humgerguty2

    I'm sorry but you are wrong about that, as I already told you, if they wanted to stop the abuse as well as bring these pedos to justice they would have handed them over to the police. Moving them to new parishes would do absolutely nothing to stop the abuse, it was specifically done as a means of trying to hide the evidence to protect their image.

    This is a direct example of religion getting away with committing crimes against humanity

  • @LadyAmaltheaUnicorn Then why has the church allowed, and even turned in priests for arrest over paedophilia since the 1980's? Also, the church made a mistake in moving the priests around, but they did not do it to intentionally make the situation worse, as this is the first known time that this has happened in the churches history.

  • @Grunt922 Your argument needs a re-evaluation. Firstly, yes there are people who use religion to harmful ends, but they are not the majority of believers, and also your facts are shit, Hitler operated on a racial agenda, not religious, and he even had priests and other religious figures executed also the dark ages are called the dark ages because humanity as a whole does not have much information of the era, the crusaders were mainly there for the riches and land, not religion.

  • For me, the definitive version of Joan of Arc was made back in 1928. :p

  • The catholic church has a hell of ALOT to answer for! They claim to be all loving and caring and yet theygladly tied poor Joan to a stake and burned her alive in such a cruel, disgusting manner.

    All this just to keep England happy. Sadly...

  • @ColumRogers Catholicism is an order which uses christianity as a power source.You can tell by their strict rules that are obviously mad by the higher class to keep the poor silent.Romans were the first to use christianity as a power source which made catholicism.The bible is a manmade tool that exploits christianity,same goes for the quran, they all use the words of prophets and forms their own book,this is how religions are created.Leaders hoping to gain power through people's unity of belief.

  • @ColumRogers 1. her trial was politically motivated, with the excuse of heresy

    2. The English and Burgundians tried and executed her for her invasion of English and Burgundian land that was owned by the English monarchy from William the conqueror

    3 the catholic church had very little influence over her trial

    your argument is now invalid

  • @ColumRogers Wrong end of the stick. We used religon as an excuse to legitimise the murder of a prisoner who would have been ransomed back to the french had she been male. Being a 'worthless commoner', with no one wanting to buy her back, we burnt her for annoying us. I always feel sorry for her.

  • Because all people in medieval Europe had noticeable American accents... Gets me when directors don't even bother looking for mildly correct accents

  • @claoufaeng

    technically, we don't have any way of knowing exactly what accents and dialects sounded like during particular times in history, so I doubt they could use correct accents

  • @LadyAmaltheaUnicorn They still wouldn't have been American ;)

  • Burn me at the stake, nail me to a cross, hang me from the highest tree - if that is the only way to get to the ETERNAL GOD OF ETERNAL TRUTH - I've been there, done that. Sunday, December 11, 2011 (C.E.), 2:29 PM (Eastern Standard Time)

  • People were so cruel back then. Saying its God's judgement but I say they should have taken a better look at the sins theyve committed before judging someone elses or asking forgiveness

  • can anyone please please put the soundtrack of this movie..i have been looking for it since ages and its not available anywhere,. especially the music in its trailer....what's that song plz tell me

  • @wetend123 Oh yea, i wanna see you get burned...mhm i would laugh xD! I'll put your "death sentence news" into facebook, google, yahoo, bing, and whatever the heck there is. I hope you got your teddy bear right with ya :P

  • @Mast3r1sgr3at blow me asshole

  • the best scene, the most heart-wrenching, o God leelee sobiesky excelled in this!

  • Betrayed by her own French people how ironic

  • @chivalry That's God for you.

  • @chivalry

    The Burgundians weren't French though, but a principality of the Holy Roman Empire, that at the time was allied with the English. I believe it didn't become officially part of France until some time in the 17th Century.

    It was basically like the equivalent of what Monaco is today

  • @chivalry Never. She was burnt by the English. Typical foul mouthed murdering swine. Joan was a saint and French heroine. The English murdered her. That is what they do, and still do.

  • @swanningaround That is what they did is what you meant. Past tense

  • @swanningaround what you get wrong is that Jean invaded English lands in France, as they were ours from when William the conqueror became the king of England, so she was the aggressor here, not England.

  • @humgerguty2 The English brutally burnt a world heroine and Saint of the Holy Catholic Church. The English are terrible people.

  • @swanningaround Yes, but you must remember that Jean invaded English lands which wee owned by the monarchy since William the conqueror, and killed the English, so she really got what she dolled out

  • @swanningaround

    I'm French and I don't blame the English.

    It was a war, and the French would have done the same. Joan of Arc was used by the French power as an instument of propaganda (sent by God to give victory to France), the English had to counter this propaganda and made her a witch and a heretic. It was not even a personal hate to my opinion, it was their national interest. They did what they had to do.

  • what year is this

    

  • @acnalla 1470s or 80s, I forget which.

  • Uhm.. Her name i Jeanne d'Arc

  • @FixieJenta

    technically her name at the name would have been Jehanne Romée since the women of France would take their mothers surname until marriage, rather than their fathers

    Though she publically used the name "Jehanne la Pucelle" which translates to "Jehanne the maid"

    You'd be right that her fathers surname was d'Arc rather than Arc, the d' meaning "of" but using the "of" was dropped in surnames over time, and I believe it was the English in France who called her "Joan" hence Joan of Arc

  • This clip is added to my play list "Gold*****."

    You are welcome to check i out.

    Thanks.

  • If I were to die the same way Joan did I'd want to see a curifix level with my eyes too.

  • what is the title of this movie???

  • @CyworldOfficial1 This movie is called 'Joan of Arc'

  • Lost her life for NOTHING.

  • 4:48 and this is yahsladynred gloating over those she hates beinf put to death, whether it is right or not

  • picture this person as the one whom ye have judged to be *reprobate* and hellbound.........ponder that for a very long time

  • the point here is that the majority said she was hellbound and a reprobate, when they werre wrong because None can judge as if holy, no one can. thats the point here

  • Music score by Asher Ettinger and Tony Kosinec.

    

  • @sassuhfrass93 The sign she said she gave the Dauphin, it too was a lie.

  • Joan gave Charles his crown and he gave her nothing in return he could have saved her but he didn't. He was crowned King because of Joan and if she was a heritic she couldn't have had him crowned if I were him I would have had a nice long thought about everything then rescue Joan. Rescue a Hertic? One problem Charles she wasn't a hertic!!

  • @EmmyRossumFan94

    Fortunately, Charles VII got his just desserts in the end. He was starved to death on his own son's orders.

  • This is the best movie of Joan of Arc by far, Leelee was amazing!! The best part about the whole thing is that she was the youngest actress ever to play Joan of Arc that and she's French just like Joan you can't get a better combination then Leelee Sobieski as Joan and having a French women play her. Other people who have played Joan weren't around her age or French. Leelee did an amazing job.

  • GOD Bless the man at 4:04

  • I love this movie. T_T

  • and for cauchon, I am sorry for him also

  • Comment removed

  • I dont need *the church* to protect me

  • @MystSilverDragon Then why bother going to church?

  • @02Blackbeard after all of your 17 yrs as a so-called priest, ye have yet to realise, that the *church* as ive told ye hundreds of times, Is NOT GOD, never has been, never will be. If ye hate GOD ye hatred is misplaced

  • @MystSilverDragon The Church created God.

  • @02Blackbeard no kidding

  • @02Blackbeard they created A GOD which rebukes whom they hate, GOD Homself does not condone this nor is He as menkind say He is.

  • @MystSilverDragon Neither is the Ultimate Reality such as the Bible declares.

  • Comment removed

  • @02Blackbeard Ive been telling ye for years John, that what the church taught ye was GOD, isnt the Truth.

  • @MystSilverDragon and anyo0ne else who blames GOD for what any *church or religion* has done in his name, well ye know that was never endorsed By GOD, and they WILL pay the price for involking HIS name in thier own hatred. Thats a fact.

  • @MystSilverDragon Well, you may as well say then that the God(s) of Jews, Christians and Muslims is a lie.

  • @02Blackbeard Im saying the GOD of religioin is a lie take that how ye wish to take it

  • @MystSilverDragon All "religion" is, is people coming together because they think they share common ground. It means no more than that. All ye need to do then is to ascertain whether they are meeting in truth or error. eg: Amish is a religion, part of a larger religion of Christianity. Some people think Amish is the true religion. Some think it is bullshit.

  • @02Blackbeard I think its fairly obvious what the problem is here and always has been. But ye donty believe in any god therefore ye opinion as per this is void aND NULL

  • @MystSilverDragon Wrong. My opinion is perfectly valid. One does NOT need to believe in the existence of a personal God in order to make a comment on a religious matter.

    You follow religion the same as anyone else. You are an evangelical. You go to a Baptist Church. To claim not to be religious, when you meet in fellowship with other Christers, is idiotic. And dishonest. But then Christians are generally LIARS.

    Joan of Arc never heard the voice of any God. She was totally deluded and suicidal.

  • Comment removed

  • @MystSilverDragon She knew nothing. She was crazy, like ye.

  • @02Blackbeard ye can comment all ye wish

  • @02Blackbeard in fact, ye have. so what are ye bitching about

  • @MystSilverDragon Have what....???

  • @02Blackbeard ye *have been freelyn able to comment all ye wish* not just here but everywhere else

  • Comment removed

  • Of course everyone CAN believe in what they want.... Yes they have the right to... That's freedom of choice. Joan of Arc served Jesus through fire, that is what makes her a saint

  • EVERYONE CAN BELIVE IN WHATEVER THEY WANT THE END.

  • ruined her story with bad acting

  • God made everything. He made the Earth. Evil had already been existed before God made the Earth. Satan (a.k.a. the devil) came to Earth, which also brought his evilness. Then, he tempted Eve, Eve gave Adam the forbidden fruit. And thus evil started. These people dont know Jesus and hates Him. Joan tried her best. God was happy that she took her best. God had shown these wicked men justice.

  • @Mast3r1sgr3at

    God made Satan ; D

  • @LadyAmaltheaUnicorn and Man made God....

  • @02Blackbeard

    Yep : D

  • @LadyAmaltheaUnicorn Technically, no. God made Lucifer, who was an Archangel. He was prideful and fell because he didn't want to follow God's commandments.

  • Comment removed

  • @Mast3r1sgr3at No such thing as God. Figment of peoples imagination and stories told long ago.

  • @Mast3r1sgr3at no evil and good are things made up in peoples minds and god doesnt exist.

  • no matter who you are no one deserves to die like that

  • @ChikaneUchiha1 that's debatable, but not her, she didn't deserve it...

  • 4:48 Barney Stinson ;)

  • funny how the very person that saved france is burned becouse the king feared her

  • Charles is an asshole for not even trying to get Joan back...ungrateful little twat he ws.

  • @Nicollie1062 This very fact proved that Henry VI was the rightful king of both England and France. LOL

    Anyway I think it's a historical misconception that Charles didn't want to ransom her. It would be ludicrous for Charles not wanting her back. If the clergy were to condemn Joan of witchcraft, his title as a king of France would be illegitimate. And that's exactly what happened.

  • I envy her as she was strong!! This woman had balls!

  • i wish there was an ost for this movie, so i could listen to the music form 4:00 and onward, boy it gives me goosebumps.

  • God allows bad things to happen to good people that His judgements of the wicked may be just as he takes their victims to Himself.

    The lake of fire and brimstone that is coming is the guilt felt by the wicked as they stand in His light no longer able to lie to themselves or anyone else. This guilt will consume their every thought and feeling as they will be left to marinate in it.

    The perfect consequence. Our own cells will witness against us, or for us. No will be no escape.