I guess when ppl dont like their arguement being disproved they muddle the conversation like spaghetti on a plate - because I've noticed in real life man vs women vids that every time a point is proven the woman will throw in an irrelevant sentence as if it were meaningful. They don't EVER say 'hey, you got me' and throw down their sword.
If it's one thing I can't stand, it's people who dont stay on topic in an arguement.
How does this not have more views?!! DAMN IT! Some one needs to do a real life reenactment. That is if they can find a woman who'd be a good sport about it, which I doubt... -_-
To be honest, I don't care if women aren't convinced by the video as it was actually more for men who are open to the message. That way women don't need to see the video, as those men will put them in their place if they pull this type of shit.
However, there are some women who do 'get it' , but they are in the minority and unfortunately, from my experience, there are probably not much more men that do either.
@mrzack888 u wrote that 2 months ago, but if u still think that, think again. I agree with all of the video and im a 21yo female. Its quite funny too. Perhaps we could call me logical, but perhaps not. I run on empathy and so am in the habit of contemplating other's perspectives. To me, it's interesting to be released from my personal agendas and comprehend the difficulties of others. The reasoning put forth in this video makes a lot of sense (and men are not dehumanised in it).
Having empathy doesn't preclude logic. As a guy I can be pretty emphatic, It is helpful when interacting socially and building rapport with others. But some people will try to use this against you, so having strong boundaries and looking rationally at others agendas and motives is crucial to mitigate against this.
Today most of women remind that they are women suddenly when they are getting into a trouble. Because of today most of women do not like to be feminine like in the past.
Equal rights? yea thats fine... but what about equal wrongs? is in, when women commit a crime or something, why does the law at times or in some states have lesser punishments than for men? i dunno how accurate this is now, but i once heard women dont recieve the death penalty. so...a woman can kill 88 people and not be executed, but if i did i'd be gassed till i was green? i wonder if feminists will petition to change that...
What a bunch of ridiculous cliches. Men watch too much sports??? pfff, I know so many who don't. I hate tv, so I don't own one. When are people gonna stop with this ridiculous "all men are like this" "All women are like that" crap, and accept that we are individuals who deserve respect, like different things, and have different goals. This kind of videos only promote hate. And I still don't understand the whole battle of the sexes thing. We are all here thanks to a woman and a man. The end.
So some men don't watch sports, I personally don't. But so what, the vast majority of people watching sports are men and the vast majority of people nagging them that they watch too much of it are women.
You're comment is just a version of "why can't we just get along". Yes everyone is an individual and many don't fit into some or all stereotypes. However, the stereotypes exist for a reason.
@Monad01 I love your video. Really nice work . The only thing I didn't enjoy was the canned laughter. I just don't like it. Some of the opinions & ideas here r serious & interesting. The laugh track seems out of place. Not trying to offend. Just saying.
Yeah, I've had a few comments akin to yours about the canned laughter and it's a fair point. I'll likely reupload on one vid (Youtube recently increased limit to 15 min) without the canned laughter when I get time.
@Monad01 If I could make a commercial about women, it would go something like this: "There is a new woman in America. A woman who takes responsibility for her actions. A woman who doesn't make false accusations against a man. A woman who doesn't use her gender as a excuse for violence. A woman who doesn't make multiple dates with HIV." But something tells me a commercial like that would never make it off the ground.
Maybe that would fly as a Public Service Announcement in 2051 ;-)
But seriously, I know there are women out there who take responsibility for themselves and their actions. It's just that modern society (us, ourselves) allows women to have their cake and eat it, and as thus, those women who are irresponsible are given permission to give an inch...and take a mile.
@Monad01 I get that we women have suffered immensely. But there comes a time when you've got to stop playing the victim and start taking responsiblitiy for your actions.
@roguegirl29 Women have suffered? Maybe, but who has suffered more fighting for your country? Why are men classed "less" than women and children? If a man dies it's natural but if a woman or child dies it's horrific?
@gmakepiece hahahaha! All I have to say to your comments, is that I prefer to stay at home listening to a justin bieber cd, than to have converstation with someone who posts comments on youtube trying to show their "intellectual superiority" I have nothing to say to someone who believes he is better than half earth's population, and I avoid closed minded people, so please leave me alone. (Answer whatever you want, I'm not gonna read it anyway)
@Mandesita We have listened to women nagging for the past forty years. "Men are this and men are that and men wont do this and men wont do that." And we stayed silent. Now it`s time for women to shut up and listen to what we have to say. That is, unless you have a problem with that?
I agree 100% , If you don't show your Vulnerable side a woman will acuse you of being a Macho Chauvinist pig But if you do open up and show your emotions she will consider you a whimp and a weakling ! So fuck the bitch and just be yourself !
@sallylongpants and your point is? Hey look it's no skin off my back no matter what you are - a liar, a prostitute, a rapest, a murderer or a woman who has too much time on her hands and way too many cats. In any case, you ignored the rest of my post apparently because you don't have a logical retort to it so you resort to sarcasm.
@sallylongpants Well your 'hunch' is off by a long shot. So much for 'women's intuition'. a. You don't know me; b) I never blamed men for everything; c. Since I'm not in the age group you mentioned it means you don't know diddly shit abuot women in any age group apparently. I don't NEED to marry a man who makes more money than me...I already work. I don't have children either so don't worry I won't be marrying a man nor having his children.
Men and women should be given equal opportunity, however equal outcome is another thing all together and if gender is a social construct as feminists espouse, women do not need special dispensations to equalise their inferiority....er....victim status....um....er....superiority....
@Monad01 No but your lame attempt to say women are inferior and play victims is biast and dishonest. Yes, I'm sure there are some women who do that. My feelings are men are pissed off because women are getting too much credit for what they do and they don't like the competition. Women are now working, cooking, cleaning house, taking care of the children, etc. etc. and if men don't get what they want, they seem pouty about it...sort of like your statement to bathwhorE.
I didn't say women are inferior, I said facetiously that feminists can't make their mind up whether women need special dispensations like, affirmative action, quotas in the workforce/college and women only scolarships/grants etc, thereby implying they can't cut it on their own and are victims of Patriarchy or are superior because they make better managers, bosses, politicians etc. It completely contradicts the feminist theory of "gender is a social construct'.
Men too can cook and clean and take care of children etc etc, so what is it you think that men are supposedly pouting about that they aren't getting what they want?
If women want to compete with men, have at it, is a free world, however maybe you'd like to revisit the first statement in the video for the consequences of that.
@Monad01 "women do not need special dispensations to equalise their inferiority....er....victim status....um....er....superiority...." that is what you said. Affirmative action covers more than just women, it covers minorities as well. The old boy network still exists, mainly because there are still men who think women should stay at home and that's how they run their businesses. True grants should be equalized to both genders.
Actually you conveniently forgot: "if gender is a social construct as feminists espouse" immediately preceding the part that you quoted. I did also include superior so if you wanna fallaciously accuse me of lamely attempting to say women are inferior I also lamely attempted to say they were superior, but you ignored that.....oh, victim status, well they are victims of the evil patriarchy (old boys club) apparently.
Grants given to both genders, regardless of race, ethnicity or religion socioeconomic background based purely upon merit, yes Rainbowbrainhead, I think we are in agreement there.
@Monad01 No. I did not conveniently forget it and you made the social construct statement BEFORE the other part as well not after which makes a difference. You said that in reference to 1) women think they are superior; 2) Your real opinion is they are inferior. All of this of course, is implied so you can back peddle as you're doing now. Oh I see so we don't live under a patriarchy now and it's men who are victims under a phallic...uh I mean matriarchy? So now you are playing the victim card
You accuse me of back peddling yet you're just twisting the meaning of my words to suit your agenda. If you believe my opinion is that women are inferior based on what I originally said and are still pressing the point after I have clarified that I don't twice...meh, whatever.
@Monad01 I am not twisting your words. You twisted them yourself with sarcasm. I didn't do that, you did. You already stated women were inferior so apparently that is your opinion. Unfortunately a lot of western men feel the same way yet the lot of you seem confused why women ask for divorce or aren't happy. I would say any woman will be unhappy with a man who feels he's superior to her, thus the reason western marriages don't work. You blokes sure are narcisisstic.
@bathwhoreE e may be equal.... but women love the double standard... and will take advantage of it at every oppritunity. Today while men are holding up the sky... women are shopping, puting on make up, looking in the mirror or talking... doing everything but helping out... and then act like its what we are supposed to do.... when you cop attitude they just find some other disposable penis to take your place.
@bathwhoreE Except we are not equal. I shouldn't have to go into details over the differences between the two sexes, especially to someone who lists himself as 39 years old. With that out of the way, how can there be true equality between them? The answer is it's impossible. While women have equal opportunity in the workplace and in sports, they will never have equal outcome since men will always dominate them. No amount of gender discrimination and drugging of our young boys will change that.
@NerfDeathcoil apparently you men DO feel dominated or else the MRA movement would not exist and you ARE dominated in many ways as long as you discard the logic that you brag about having and it goes out the door when you get a hard on, you'll always be dominated because men do not think logically when it comes to sex. This must be a great disappointment to you in thinking you're superior and dominate when in reality, your dick is your downfall. Your weakness is your will to dominate.
It is more about whether a man allows a woman to manipulate him into changing, with the expectation of overt approval, yet paradoxically, the usual result is covert disapproval and diminishing sexual interest from the woman.
Re the views being unsound based on the evidence in the difference between men's and women's brains, of course we can only see a correlation between the differences in men's and women's behavour, which does not mean this is the total and only cause of all of it. Maybe it is that men are socialised to like mechanics and women are socialised to enjoy fashion. Socialisation would likely play a part. Just how much, as you say is tenuous.
Though behaviours of young children have been studied showing little girls typically spending more time looking at faces than objects and little boys showing more interest in objects than faces.
For one, individual differences can account for a large part of the variance observed across subjects. For example, a random man may have more axons in his corpus callosum than a random female.
This ignores that our behavior is complex and arises out of dynamic interplay between our history, and the task we are given in the moment.
The research here is tenuous, at best. We have observed differences, but we don't know what to make of them yet. Any pronouncements are presumptive as yet.
Women tend to have more grey matter - that is actual functional nerve cells in the entire nervous system.
What's called modular nativism is the view that these structures account for behavioral differences in men and women. E.g. women are often said to be better at communication because there are more connections allowing their right brain and the speaking left brain to talk back and forth.
@Zac6230 Gur et al (1999) in the Journal of Neuroscience found that women tend to have more gray matter, and men tend to have more white matter and CSF. But the point of the entire post was that functional differences in behavior have less to do with some genetic or sex determinism and more to do with the dynamic interplay of history and experience.
Again, that point really wasn't the heart of my argument. If anything the differences in observed results support the crux of what I was trying to say about individual differences and dynamics being more important than structural differences in the brain that are often given the highlight.
@Zac6230 I never said it's social. However, psychology and neuroscience researchers are often too eager to jump on the genes bandwagon, without properly probing the dynamic interplay that is at work. Biological differences doubtless account for differences in cognitive abilities. However, biology can be impacted by environment, and the idea that behavior differences between the sexes arises because of gene differences that give rise to biological differences is poorly explored.
@landfillpoet its not read the blank slate the modern denial of human nature its almost all biological. i know this becuase i once bought into the social explanatation then i realized how its all lies and all bunk by biased " researchers"
@Zac6230 There is almost no good psychological data that can directly link genes and behavior. It simply doesn't exist. Very few people hold a strict tabula rasa, but research has shown that behavior is assembled in the moment, not pre-programmed. The environment can affect biology more than the other way around (epigenetics). In fact, research has consistently shown the effect of experience on brain organization and plasticity.
@landfillpoet yes there is stop lying read a book by someone that doesnt spew BS . Im done with with you its not worth my time. read the blank slate by steven pinker
@Zac6230 Ah, The Blank Slate by Steven Pinker. I'm glad you brought him up, because some of Pinker's own work on Bootstrapping has been recently shown to not be innate. Essentially, he can't even defend his own work. It might have something to do with all the time he spends writing schlock like the Blank Slate.
You don't have to accept what I'm saying, but I'm not lying. I'm doing my PhD thesis on this, and the evidence is shaky, built off assumptions.
@landfillpoet sorry its biology, and you're too dumb too see it and yes you're another brainwashed fool. I know this becuase I used to agree with people like you until I pulled my head from my ass. I suggest you do the same. stop replying it's like Im talking to a monkey on the phone
Haha, you really got me there, Zac. I recommend reading Gerald Edelman's "Neural Darwinism" if you like "Biopsych" so much. In it he presents one of the most comprehensive, neurally grounded models of cognition yet formed - without invoking Pinker's homunculi, or some mysterious gene. Edelman's work is considered as a leading theory of the brain.
Also, you can say I'm brainwashed, but you're just following the nativist crowd. Probably too much "Biopsych"
@St37I wouldn't be so quick to say that no one can answer that without a reference to genes. I cannot, but I have never studied canine genetics. Over the past 40 years, developmental systems theorists have shown dozens of examples of behaviors previously thought to be innate that were actually developed. I recommend Rethinking Innateness and The Ontogeny of Information as resources on this topic. I would also caution against saying that an answer cannot be provided without a genetic explanation.
It appears ScienceDaily (Jan. 22, 2005) states that men have 6.5 times more grey matter related to intelligence(women have 10 times more white matter for the same). I think the confusion is that Gur et al(1999) is referring to overall grey matter where the former (ScienceDaily) was referring to the frontal lobes.
This depends on your conception of what constitutes intelligence. The frontal lobe, and more precisely areas like the doroslateral prefrontal cortex within this lobe, perform certain functions. However, intelligence is brain areas working in concert. So, perhaps a better measure of "intelligence" would be measuring axonal reentrant white matter than actual somatic grey matter.
As a theory, I reject modularity. Intelligence isn't in an area.
@St37One Oh, most definitely. Since I come from a dynamical systems background, I would definitely stress motor development and its role on shaping the brain. My point in all of this was that, in my opinion, supposed neural differences between men and women are not reflective of actual intelligence differences - you are more likely to find intelligence differences via individual differences than via sex.
@St37One So, like I said earlier your conception of intelligence is important here. If you are basing your conception of intelligence on an IQ test like the Wechsler, then there are some systematic differences - which likely reflect bias in the test, and score difference likely reflecting systematic differences in developmental systems between boys and girls, not genetic differences.
However, as I said, I don't think this concept of intelligence is accurate.
@St37One No more than I would expect you to blame me for perceiving you as such. I suggest you read the books I mentioned. Throw Neuroconstructivism and The Triple Helix in there - all four titles highlight the caution students of behavior must take in ascribing a behavior to genes, because the path from gene to behavior is not clear.
And don't pass your ignorant prejudice off as a criticism of my opinion - I saw no "facts" from you.
@St37One Also, the test bias is well documented and acknowledged by intelligence researchers. Also, the idea that different development plays a role in different elements of gender, including achievement on intelligence tests is a well documented theory in the literature. Adrienne Harris specifically as looked at the role of developmental systems on intelligence.
You are quick to diminish the idea - perhaps because it reflects your own prejudice?
If you find a categorical difference in outcomes, then you have found "evidence" of a bias.
In other words, the test itself is not biased unless it was designed to be biased, but these intelligence researchers who you have heard about might be biased, because by being dogmatic and politically correct, they are more concerned about the ends than the means. They work backwards from desired conclusion to underlying logic/premises.
Talk about ad hoc and cheap claims! Now you are making the claim that the researchers themselves are dogmatic and PC, belying your ignorance of this subject, the methods, theories, tools, and explanations of psychology. Read up on the test bias (more than Wikipedia, please).
You are essentially telling me that you have never heard/read about the ideas I am talking about, therefore you don't think they are valid. Please.
I want to weigh in on the sex differences in brain research stuff - putting aside the obvious straw men arguments from the woman in the video ;)
There are indeed some regular observed differenced in structural neuroanatomy between men and women. E.g., women tend to have more axonal white matter in their corpus callosum, a structure that connects the two hemispheres.
Men tend to have more myelinated axons. Myelin, a fatty deposit on a neuron's axon, speeds transmission of neural signals...
This video is funny. I agree with the guy even though I'm a girl. I don't want any girly guy so I assume some of them don't want any "manly" girl. Relationships shouldn't be about competing with each other, but ppl should understand women's side of the argument. I think some girls just want to be able to rely on themselves because they're scared to trust a guy.
The vast majority of guys don't want a "manly' girl or they would be attracted to men. Men do understand women's side of the arguement, we hear it all the time on the mainstream media how men are "little boys who won't grow up" & "can't commit"
However why should men commit? What is in it for them? What are women going to bring to the table that will make commitment worth their while?
Girls not trusting men? Problem is the guys girls are attracted to usually have many other girls after them & since women are sexually liberal these days, there's much temptation.
These women scared to trust can: find a man who is not so much in demand (plenty of them around), accept a man who who won't commit or find a man who considers commitment as a priority.....however, what will a particular woman bring to the table that will make commitment worth his while?
Both men and women should be bringing their whole self and identity to the *table* and use the strengths and attributes they have to compliment each other. If some are burned or have problems with commitment, then that is their journey to work out being attracted to women who are together and same goes for women.
Yes women and men should equally bring everything to the table.
But if what men experience is not the same as women and the consequences to men are different based on the same actions women might take. Therefore men's journey is different to women and consequently their views.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I would not have watched this if monado did not respond to me on another video. Must be nice to create a video where the man has total control and the woman makes stereotypical comments.
It is probably a mans dream to have a conversation like this without a women interjecting. Womens brains do respond faster and that is why men get frustrated when trying to discuss things.
Anyway, there is a lot of stereotypical concepts and some good ones, but their is a science reason for some too.
These stereotypes exist because so many women make these or similar statements about men. So, exceptions of women not doing so actually prove the rule, rather than disprove it.
I just checked back in here. Why did you remove my comment? Did something strike a nerve? because I thought you and I had good pm's to discuss our points of view.
I didn't remove your comment, you received 6 negatives and Youtube, I assume, hides a comment after 6 negatives. You can view your comment if you click reply.
I would guess your comment got those negatives because you stated: "Womens brains do respond faster and that is why men get frustrated when trying to discuss things" then in the next sentence "there is a lot of stereotypical concepts"
What I said about brains is based on scientific research, most books will help understand about male and female brain response systems. You can check it out.
And yes, it is true that men get frustrated because they need to process from right to left and back to right again. Womens paths between left and right are like major city roadmaps. Mens are like rural roads.
Women process faster and this makes them more efficient in multitasking and certain jobs, but not all women that is true..
And some men are good at multitasking or process different and just as efficient, we used different brain skills do manage this.
That is why women can read facial expressions better and hear a cry or tone or pitch of voices in their babies, children and know distinctions. It is proven that men have less response to such gestures or faces. It does not mean man is better or woman is better, they have different strengths, so it is not stereotypical in the least but based on proper research.
Women's brains respond faster to what? Correct information? Witty retorts? Reading maps? Parking cars adeptly? What? Your answer: "that is why men get frustrated when trying to discuss things."
Who gets frustrated? I could as easily say that women get frustrated with men because women tend to get more emotional rather than viewing the facts dispassionately, taking things personally rather than the topic at hand.
Scientific fact: Women have more pathways between the hemispheres. Unproven stereotype: men get frustrated trying to discuss things.
I won't even disagree with you regarding your stereotype, however I also consider that women tend to get emotional rather than viewing the facts dispassionately as having equal merit.
You used the premise of the research to hypothesise and by doing so you stereotyped an entire gender
One should preface with not all men or not all women fall into neat categories, that is true.
II should clarify that men can get frustrated when in discussions with women many times because they get lost.
But when they have shorter sentences or gaps it works. I know I have brothers, Uncles, cousins and friends and a husband who will all agree. But your video is full of stereotypes, so not sure here.
We should be aware of differences, but not peg all people (men or women into those)
You used a stereotype and you are trying to wiggle your way out of it. In fact you further it by stating that men get frustrated in discussions with women and many times get lost just as I find that women take things personally by looking at the subject emotionally when discussing things with them.
I stereotyped women and you did men.
Interestingly though I usually say less words, use shorter sentences as your uncles, brothers, cousins, friends, and husband do or have longer gaps....
(because women like to dominate the conversation due to their expressiveness), until I speak about something I am passionate about, especially when I disagree, then an avalanche of speech will ensue, until I am finished, whereby I will revert to being a 'typical man' of few words. And I ain't no anomaly as it seems you haven't come across men who do express what they are passionate about.
Men get frustrated when talking with women because when men make a valid point women side step the issue by changing topics or phase shift the context of what was just said.
In other words, women can't admit that they are wrong!
Very true, alot of the time women don't want a solution to a problem or a logical argument to get in the way of their emotions in the moment, be they good bad or otherwise as solutions and logic are an antithesis to generating and sustaining those emotions.
Not that women can't be logical, its just they don't seem to have as much practice at logic as men ;-)
@Monad01 Absolutely! And as if to prove my point power1 has tried to respond to my comment with a whole list of divergent remarks without one point actually addressing the issue I originally raised, she could not respond here so she left the comments on my channel .. You may note I left the three w's off from her you tube nic. This seems to have been a problem when she has attempted to reply to me.
I have left her comments on my channel for all to view.
@Monad01 Logic or reason is not the solution for the woman who has a problem. She only wants emotion, but reasoning dissolves emotion. Reasoning gives her nothing, as her life *is* the ups and downs of emotion.
Only by realising that emotions are self-perpetuating, like a vicious cycle, a woman might dip her little toe into the waters of reason. This is unlikely to happen if she is pretty, popular, and embosomed in the midst of the "smiles".
Hmm, I guess some women are not bankers, lawyers, doctors, teachers, mothers who raise the kids for you or teach them or run companies.
IT ALL takes forms of logic.
What is logic? It is not just concrete set in stone rules. The human element prevails. Many women also have intuitive senses. Men can have this too, they can hone these skills.
Women can and do admit they are wrong. You are perhaps not meeting the right women, or not having discussions in a way that does not cause defensiveness or confrontation.
Perhaps looking at self, helps one discern language or communication issues.
I am wrong - about makiing errors, not being perfect. BUT, our lives and worth is NEVER wrong. Distinctions must be made.
Also, though women's brains may respond faster than men's, this does not mean that the quality of women's thoughts is better, or what women state is truer.
I tend to disagree on that point. Womens brains work faster and when in discussions, University discourse etc, this can be advantageous. I am in University, the young men in class do not speak as much, and the girls ususally outdo them in verbal debates, but some young men are great at these discussions, so one cannot stereotype. The more educated the more this evens out with male and female btw.
@wwwpower1 Perhaps their brians do respond faster but rarely are those responses grounded by logic and reasoning. Maybe women should take time to think about what's been said before saying something stupid in response. But that's asking too much because you're women. My bad.
Our brains respond and assimilate information faster from verbal and written works, even facial cues. It means that we are in a way nurturers who must be "in tune" with humans.
So that one can respond accordingly.
Men have strengths that aid in getting to points A to B at times faster so , that We should align those strengths and work together, for that is how we are all made. To compliment, NOT complete one another.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
cragmac1000...hey...get a sense of humor going...life is too short to be so angry about women....lol... I guess you have just been meeting the wrong kind. This video is good and true in many ways. Don't totally agree but fair is fair. Btw, I am a woman....lol. Women have a lot to offer as well as men in life. Cosmo? What's that?...:).. Take care.
Whenever women want to make a point they fail! They just make some statement they saw in cosmo or heard from another one of their many moronic "girlfriends" andthen parrot it back in your face in order to control the conversation the way she wants it to go, women are fucking psychotic!
That's the preacher from @Jesusisthetruevine !
TheRojo387 1 week ago
I guess when ppl dont like their arguement being disproved they muddle the conversation like spaghetti on a plate - because I've noticed in real life man vs women vids that every time a point is proven the woman will throw in an irrelevant sentence as if it were meaningful. They don't EVER say 'hey, you got me' and throw down their sword.
If it's one thing I can't stand, it's people who dont stay on topic in an arguement.
33melonpaws77 3 weeks ago
How does this not have more views?!! DAMN IT! Some one needs to do a real life reenactment. That is if they can find a woman who'd be a good sport about it, which I doubt... -_-
unnamed715 2 months ago
Great video!!!
upallhours9 2 months ago
this video is not going to convince women. women are not logical. this video is too logical, and that is the problem....
mrzack888 3 months ago 12
@mrzack888
To be honest, I don't care if women aren't convinced by the video as it was actually more for men who are open to the message. That way women don't need to see the video, as those men will put them in their place if they pull this type of shit.
However, there are some women who do 'get it' , but they are in the minority and unfortunately, from my experience, there are probably not much more men that do either.
Monad01 3 months ago 8
@mrzack888 u wrote that 2 months ago, but if u still think that, think again. I agree with all of the video and im a 21yo female. Its quite funny too. Perhaps we could call me logical, but perhaps not. I run on empathy and so am in the habit of contemplating other's perspectives. To me, it's interesting to be released from my personal agendas and comprehend the difficulties of others. The reasoning put forth in this video makes a lot of sense (and men are not dehumanised in it).
33melonpaws77 3 weeks ago
@33melonpaws77
Having empathy doesn't preclude logic. As a guy I can be pretty emphatic, It is helpful when interacting socially and building rapport with others. But some people will try to use this against you, so having strong boundaries and looking rationally at others agendas and motives is crucial to mitigate against this.
Monad01 2 weeks ago
Today most of women remind that they are women suddenly when they are getting into a trouble. Because of today most of women do not like to be feminine like in the past.
dulanthad 3 months ago
when their will be the first men vs women Rubgy game... then we could speak about men-women equality.
Washingstone 3 months ago
Equal rights? yea thats fine... but what about equal wrongs? is in, when women commit a crime or something, why does the law at times or in some states have lesser punishments than for men? i dunno how accurate this is now, but i once heard women dont recieve the death penalty. so...a woman can kill 88 people and not be executed, but if i did i'd be gassed till i was green? i wonder if feminists will petition to change that...
LamonicBomb 4 months ago
Well said
svennbreng 6 months ago
You have to agree with 4:36 - 5:14
Fankas2000 6 months ago
What a bunch of ridiculous cliches. Men watch too much sports??? pfff, I know so many who don't. I hate tv, so I don't own one. When are people gonna stop with this ridiculous "all men are like this" "All women are like that" crap, and accept that we are individuals who deserve respect, like different things, and have different goals. This kind of videos only promote hate. And I still don't understand the whole battle of the sexes thing. We are all here thanks to a woman and a man. The end.
Mandesita 7 months ago
@Mandesita
So some men don't watch sports, I personally don't. But so what, the vast majority of people watching sports are men and the vast majority of people nagging them that they watch too much of it are women.
You're comment is just a version of "why can't we just get along". Yes everyone is an individual and many don't fit into some or all stereotypes. However, the stereotypes exist for a reason.
Monad01 7 months ago 4
@Monad01
And as women frequently make these types of statements about men and we hardly ever hear a response from men, well this is my response. The end.
Monad01 7 months ago
@Monad01 I love your video. Really nice work . The only thing I didn't enjoy was the canned laughter. I just don't like it. Some of the opinions & ideas here r serious & interesting. The laugh track seems out of place. Not trying to offend. Just saying.
Thanks for sharing this excellent video.
ggmorvaj 7 months ago
@ggmorvaj
Yeah, I've had a few comments akin to yours about the canned laughter and it's a fair point. I'll likely reupload on one vid (Youtube recently increased limit to 15 min) without the canned laughter when I get time.
Thanks for the feedback
Monad01 6 months ago
@Monad01 another real man monad01
akthemoor 7 months ago
@Monad01 If I could make a commercial about women, it would go something like this: "There is a new woman in America. A woman who takes responsibility for her actions. A woman who doesn't make false accusations against a man. A woman who doesn't use her gender as a excuse for violence. A woman who doesn't make multiple dates with HIV." But something tells me a commercial like that would never make it off the ground.
roguegirl29 5 months ago in playlist roguegirl29's Favorited Videos
@roguegirl29
Maybe that would fly as a Public Service Announcement in 2051 ;-)
But seriously, I know there are women out there who take responsibility for themselves and their actions. It's just that modern society (us, ourselves) allows women to have their cake and eat it, and as thus, those women who are irresponsible are given permission to give an inch...and take a mile.
Monad01 5 months ago
@Monad01 I get that we women have suffered immensely. But there comes a time when you've got to stop playing the victim and start taking responsiblitiy for your actions.
roguegirl29 5 months ago in playlist roguegirl29's Favorited Videos
@roguegirl29 Women have suffered? Maybe, but who has suffered more fighting for your country? Why are men classed "less" than women and children? If a man dies it's natural but if a woman or child dies it's horrific?
jayc342009 3 months ago
@Mandesita Gee, you sound like a...woman. Or a tragic fem man.
gmakepiece 7 months ago
@Mandesita Ah, the 'Fence Sitter Posture' and thus "I'm above all your petty concerns" gambit.' Excellent, but a logical fallacy stream nonetheless.
gmakepiece 7 months ago
@gmakepiece hahahaha! All I have to say to your comments, is that I prefer to stay at home listening to a justin bieber cd, than to have converstation with someone who posts comments on youtube trying to show their "intellectual superiority" I have nothing to say to someone who believes he is better than half earth's population, and I avoid closed minded people, so please leave me alone. (Answer whatever you want, I'm not gonna read it anyway)
Mandesita 7 months ago
@Mandesita How interestingly contradictory. So you're a female then. Got it.
gmakepiece 7 months ago
@Mandesita faggot
illuminous09 5 months ago
@Mandesita We have listened to women nagging for the past forty years. "Men are this and men are that and men wont do this and men wont do that." And we stayed silent. Now it`s time for women to shut up and listen to what we have to say. That is, unless you have a problem with that?
1WhoSeeks 2 months ago 5
I agree 100% , If you don't show your Vulnerable side a woman will acuse you of being a Macho Chauvinist pig But if you do open up and show your emotions she will consider you a whimp and a weakling ! So fuck the bitch and just be yourself !
nicktesla45 7 months ago
@sallylongpants and your point is? Hey look it's no skin off my back no matter what you are - a liar, a prostitute, a rapest, a murderer or a woman who has too much time on her hands and way too many cats. In any case, you ignored the rest of my post apparently because you don't have a logical retort to it so you resort to sarcasm.
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@sallylongpants Well your 'hunch' is off by a long shot. So much for 'women's intuition'. a. You don't know me; b) I never blamed men for everything; c. Since I'm not in the age group you mentioned it means you don't know diddly shit abuot women in any age group apparently. I don't NEED to marry a man who makes more money than me...I already work. I don't have children either so don't worry I won't be marrying a man nor having his children.
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@sallylongpants so if there's a point to your guessing my age, why did you not state what that was?
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
Would have been a lot better without the canned laughter.
stevesusenet 11 months ago
her tits are far apart now thats a man lol jk.
762hillboy 1 year ago
I think we've all heard this kind of stuff before again and again. Now we all have a witty response to it all.
gamenode 1 year ago
Lets Just admit we are Equal.No Gender has an advantage.Then we could put this argument to Rest.We could all live in Peace.
bathwhoreE 1 year ago
@bathwhoreE According to the Nazi Feminist Doctrine, women are better because they are women.
roguegirl29 1 year ago
@bathwhoreE
Men and women should be given equal opportunity, however equal outcome is another thing all together and if gender is a social construct as feminists espouse, women do not need special dispensations to equalise their inferiority....er....victim status....um....er....superiority....
Monad01 1 year ago 18
@Monad01 so now men are the victims boo hoo...look who's inferior now.
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead
So men passively accepting the status quo is empowering and makes men superior?
Monad01 8 months ago
@Monad01 No but your lame attempt to say women are inferior and play victims is biast and dishonest. Yes, I'm sure there are some women who do that. My feelings are men are pissed off because women are getting too much credit for what they do and they don't like the competition. Women are now working, cooking, cleaning house, taking care of the children, etc. etc. and if men don't get what they want, they seem pouty about it...sort of like your statement to bathwhorE.
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead
I didn't say women are inferior, I said facetiously that feminists can't make their mind up whether women need special dispensations like, affirmative action, quotas in the workforce/college and women only scolarships/grants etc, thereby implying they can't cut it on their own and are victims of Patriarchy or are superior because they make better managers, bosses, politicians etc. It completely contradicts the feminist theory of "gender is a social construct'.
Monad01 8 months ago
@Monad01
Men too can cook and clean and take care of children etc etc, so what is it you think that men are supposedly pouting about that they aren't getting what they want?
If women want to compete with men, have at it, is a free world, however maybe you'd like to revisit the first statement in the video for the consequences of that.
Monad01 8 months ago
@Monad01 "women do not need special dispensations to equalise their inferiority....er....victim status....um....er....superiority...." that is what you said. Affirmative action covers more than just women, it covers minorities as well. The old boy network still exists, mainly because there are still men who think women should stay at home and that's how they run their businesses. True grants should be equalized to both genders.
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead
Actually you conveniently forgot: "if gender is a social construct as feminists espouse" immediately preceding the part that you quoted. I did also include superior so if you wanna fallaciously accuse me of lamely attempting to say women are inferior I also lamely attempted to say they were superior, but you ignored that.....oh, victim status, well they are victims of the evil patriarchy (old boys club) apparently.
Monad01 8 months ago
@Monad01
Grants given to both genders, regardless of race, ethnicity or religion socioeconomic background based purely upon merit, yes Rainbowbrainhead, I think we are in agreement there.
Monad01 8 months ago
@Monad01 No. I did not conveniently forget it and you made the social construct statement BEFORE the other part as well not after which makes a difference. You said that in reference to 1) women think they are superior; 2) Your real opinion is they are inferior. All of this of course, is implied so you can back peddle as you're doing now. Oh I see so we don't live under a patriarchy now and it's men who are victims under a phallic...uh I mean matriarchy? So now you are playing the victim card
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead
You accuse me of back peddling yet you're just twisting the meaning of my words to suit your agenda. If you believe my opinion is that women are inferior based on what I originally said and are still pressing the point after I have clarified that I don't twice...meh, whatever.
Monad01 8 months ago
@Monad01 I am not twisting your words. You twisted them yourself with sarcasm. I didn't do that, you did. You already stated women were inferior so apparently that is your opinion. Unfortunately a lot of western men feel the same way yet the lot of you seem confused why women ask for divorce or aren't happy. I would say any woman will be unhappy with a man who feels he's superior to her, thus the reason western marriages don't work. You blokes sure are narcisisstic.
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
Lohohol. Those women accusations and men's responses are so artificial.
MidnightTea7 4 months ago
@Monad01 give a woman 50/50 status and you become her slave. NOT GONNA HAPPEN HEREEEE!!!
AntiFeminaziMale 4 months ago
@bathwhoreE e may be equal.... but women love the double standard... and will take advantage of it at every oppritunity. Today while men are holding up the sky... women are shopping, puting on make up, looking in the mirror or talking... doing everything but helping out... and then act like its what we are supposed to do.... when you cop attitude they just find some other disposable penis to take your place.
HopllyteAlpha 1 year ago
@bathwhoreE Except we are not equal. I shouldn't have to go into details over the differences between the two sexes, especially to someone who lists himself as 39 years old. With that out of the way, how can there be true equality between them? The answer is it's impossible. While women have equal opportunity in the workplace and in sports, they will never have equal outcome since men will always dominate them. No amount of gender discrimination and drugging of our young boys will change that.
NerfDeathcoil 1 year ago
@NerfDeathcoil apparently you men DO feel dominated or else the MRA movement would not exist and you ARE dominated in many ways as long as you discard the logic that you brag about having and it goes out the door when you get a hard on, you'll always be dominated because men do not think logically when it comes to sex. This must be a great disappointment to you in thinking you're superior and dominate when in reality, your dick is your downfall. Your weakness is your will to dominate.
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@bathwhoreE
Stop using ur Vagina to get promotions...Then we will be equals
Desishikamaru 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Desishikamaru stop using your dick as a whip then we will all be equals.
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
You Have No right to change a Man.Would women have a right to change a man????????
bathwhoreE 1 year ago
@bathwhoreE
It is more about whether a man allows a woman to manipulate him into changing, with the expectation of overt approval, yet paradoxically, the usual result is covert disapproval and diminishing sexual interest from the woman.
Monad01 1 year ago 2
Interesting Video.Think About It.
bathwhoreE 1 year ago
Brilliant Video.I Love the Logic and it feels Right.
bathwhoreE 1 year ago
man i love this except for the canned laughter.
klined 1 year ago
Go your own way, brothers! Every woman's got one!
Torgo1969 1 year ago
So funny when the guy turns to the camera to talk.
isocrate27 1 year ago 5
Wow. This is hilarious and true.
daboys1215 1 year ago 2
This is GREAT stuff.
TIME TO RISE UP BROTHERS!!
BE MEN!
EliteDoomer 1 year ago 4
....too freakin' funny!!!
I like the line... "damed if you do, damed if you don't"
lebinjctn 1 year ago 2
@ tebinjctn
And it's probably best to just do whatever takes the least effort in a no win situation.
Monad01 1 year ago 3
Monad01, I see you've done your homework.
Khemistry101 2 years ago
Re the views being unsound based on the evidence in the difference between men's and women's brains, of course we can only see a correlation between the differences in men's and women's behavour, which does not mean this is the total and only cause of all of it. Maybe it is that men are socialised to like mechanics and women are socialised to enjoy fashion. Socialisation would likely play a part. Just how much, as you say is tenuous.
Monad01 2 years ago
Though behaviours of young children have been studied showing little girls typically spending more time looking at faces than objects and little boys showing more interest in objects than faces.
Monad01 2 years ago
For one, individual differences can account for a large part of the variance observed across subjects. For example, a random man may have more axons in his corpus callosum than a random female.
This ignores that our behavior is complex and arises out of dynamic interplay between our history, and the task we are given in the moment.
The research here is tenuous, at best. We have observed differences, but we don't know what to make of them yet. Any pronouncements are presumptive as yet.
landfillpoet 2 years ago
Women tend to have more grey matter - that is actual functional nerve cells in the entire nervous system.
What's called modular nativism is the view that these structures account for behavioral differences in men and women. E.g. women are often said to be better at communication because there are more connections allowing their right brain and the speaking left brain to talk back and forth.
These views are unsound...
landfillpoet 2 years ago
@landfillpoet men have more gray matter
Zac6230 2 years ago
@Zac6230 Gur et al (1999) in the Journal of Neuroscience found that women tend to have more gray matter, and men tend to have more white matter and CSF. But the point of the entire post was that functional differences in behavior have less to do with some genetic or sex determinism and more to do with the dynamic interplay of history and experience.
landfillpoet 2 years ago
@landfillpoet I swear to god I heard the opposite and still belive that I am right
Zac6230 2 years ago
Again, that point really wasn't the heart of my argument. If anything the differences in observed results support the crux of what I was trying to say about individual differences and dynamics being more important than structural differences in the brain that are often given the highlight.
landfillpoet 2 years ago
@landfillpoet Sorry Im for Biology Ive read too much about i Biopsych to belive its social
Zac6230 2 years ago
@Zac6230 I never said it's social. However, psychology and neuroscience researchers are often too eager to jump on the genes bandwagon, without properly probing the dynamic interplay that is at work. Biological differences doubtless account for differences in cognitive abilities. However, biology can be impacted by environment, and the idea that behavior differences between the sexes arises because of gene differences that give rise to biological differences is poorly explored.
landfillpoet 2 years ago
@landfillpoet its not read the blank slate the modern denial of human nature its almost all biological. i know this becuase i once bought into the social explanatation then i realized how its all lies and all bunk by biased " researchers"
Zac6230 2 years ago
@Zac6230 There is almost no good psychological data that can directly link genes and behavior. It simply doesn't exist. Very few people hold a strict tabula rasa, but research has shown that behavior is assembled in the moment, not pre-programmed. The environment can affect biology more than the other way around (epigenetics). In fact, research has consistently shown the effect of experience on brain organization and plasticity.
landfillpoet 2 years ago
@landfillpoet yes there is stop lying read a book by someone that doesnt spew BS . Im done with with you its not worth my time. read the blank slate by steven pinker
Zac6230 2 years ago
@Zac6230 Ah, The Blank Slate by Steven Pinker. I'm glad you brought him up, because some of Pinker's own work on Bootstrapping has been recently shown to not be innate. Essentially, he can't even defend his own work. It might have something to do with all the time he spends writing schlock like the Blank Slate.
You don't have to accept what I'm saying, but I'm not lying. I'm doing my PhD thesis on this, and the evidence is shaky, built off assumptions.
landfillpoet 2 years ago
@landfillpoet sorry its biology, and you're too dumb too see it and yes you're another brainwashed fool. I know this becuase I used to agree with people like you until I pulled my head from my ass. I suggest you do the same. stop replying it's like Im talking to a monkey on the phone
Zac6230 2 years ago
@landfillpoet I studied bio pysh I know the deal. stop being such a try hard
Zac6230 2 years ago
Haha, you really got me there, Zac. I recommend reading Gerald Edelman's "Neural Darwinism" if you like "Biopsych" so much. In it he presents one of the most comprehensive, neurally grounded models of cognition yet formed - without invoking Pinker's homunculi, or some mysterious gene. Edelman's work is considered as a leading theory of the brain.
Also, you can say I'm brainwashed, but you're just following the nativist crowd. Probably too much "Biopsych"
landfillpoet 2 years ago
If you can not link genes to behavior.
then how can you explain the conspicuous variation in temperment between different breeds of dog?
Why is there a such thing as a domestic dog or cat?
You cant answer that without reference to genetic engineering/selection.
St37One 2 years ago
@St37I wouldn't be so quick to say that no one can answer that without a reference to genes. I cannot, but I have never studied canine genetics. Over the past 40 years, developmental systems theorists have shown dozens of examples of behaviors previously thought to be innate that were actually developed. I recommend Rethinking Innateness and The Ontogeny of Information as resources on this topic. I would also caution against saying that an answer cannot be provided without a genetic explanation.
landfillpoet 2 years ago
It appears ScienceDaily (Jan. 22, 2005) states that men have 6.5 times more grey matter related to intelligence(women have 10 times more white matter for the same). I think the confusion is that Gur et al(1999) is referring to overall grey matter where the former (ScienceDaily) was referring to the frontal lobes.
Monad01 2 years ago
@Monad01 Good point, but the idea that intelligence is localized in the frontal lobe is...well, inaccurate.
landfillpoet 2 years ago
@landfillpoet
the idea that intelligence is localized in the frontal lobe has a similar validity to the idea that intelligence is localized inside the cranium.
Even though there is a lot of truth to it, it is not the whole story.
But it is not an "inaccurate" idea. Not by a long shot.
St37One 2 years ago
This depends on your conception of what constitutes intelligence. The frontal lobe, and more precisely areas like the doroslateral prefrontal cortex within this lobe, perform certain functions. However, intelligence is brain areas working in concert. So, perhaps a better measure of "intelligence" would be measuring axonal reentrant white matter than actual somatic grey matter.
As a theory, I reject modularity. Intelligence isn't in an area.
landfillpoet 2 years ago
yes, but intelligence is also the brain working with the rest of the body and with the environment.
St37One 2 years ago
@St37One Oh, most definitely. Since I come from a dynamical systems background, I would definitely stress motor development and its role on shaping the brain. My point in all of this was that, in my opinion, supposed neural differences between men and women are not reflective of actual intelligence differences - you are more likely to find intelligence differences via individual differences than via sex.
landfillpoet 2 years ago
the sex differences in intelligence are not average differences.
They are differences in the population distribution curves.
There are more men at the very top and also at the bottom, and women cluster closer to the mean.
St37One 2 years ago
@St37One So, like I said earlier your conception of intelligence is important here. If you are basing your conception of intelligence on an IQ test like the Wechsler, then there are some systematic differences - which likely reflect bias in the test, and score difference likely reflecting systematic differences in developmental systems between boys and girls, not genetic differences.
However, as I said, I don't think this concept of intelligence is accurate.
landfillpoet 2 years ago
Everytime you use the word "likely" it is done in the most subjective, Ad-hoc, and cheapened fashion.
Ignorant prejudice dressed up as "probability" is not going to pass for real knowledge.
Would you blame anyone for percieving you as dogmaticly predetermined in your thought process?
St37One 2 years ago
@St37One No more than I would expect you to blame me for perceiving you as such. I suggest you read the books I mentioned. Throw Neuroconstructivism and The Triple Helix in there - all four titles highlight the caution students of behavior must take in ascribing a behavior to genes, because the path from gene to behavior is not clear.
And don't pass your ignorant prejudice off as a criticism of my opinion - I saw no "facts" from you.
landfillpoet 2 years ago
@St37One Also, the test bias is well documented and acknowledged by intelligence researchers. Also, the idea that different development plays a role in different elements of gender, including achievement on intelligence tests is a well documented theory in the literature. Adrienne Harris specifically as looked at the role of developmental systems on intelligence.
You are quick to diminish the idea - perhaps because it reflects your own prejudice?
landfillpoet 2 years ago
This "test bias" is an ad-hoc, circular claim.
If you find a categorical difference in outcomes, then you have found "evidence" of a bias.
In other words, the test itself is not biased unless it was designed to be biased, but these intelligence researchers who you have heard about might be biased, because by being dogmatic and politically correct, they are more concerned about the ends than the means. They work backwards from desired conclusion to underlying logic/premises.
St37One 2 years ago
Talk about ad hoc and cheap claims! Now you are making the claim that the researchers themselves are dogmatic and PC, belying your ignorance of this subject, the methods, theories, tools, and explanations of psychology. Read up on the test bias (more than Wikipedia, please).
You are essentially telling me that you have never heard/read about the ideas I am talking about, therefore you don't think they are valid. Please.
landfillpoet 2 years ago
@landfillpoet You read wrong. Men have more gray matter.
1WhoSeeks 2 months ago
I want to weigh in on the sex differences in brain research stuff - putting aside the obvious straw men arguments from the woman in the video ;)
There are indeed some regular observed differenced in structural neuroanatomy between men and women. E.g., women tend to have more axonal white matter in their corpus callosum, a structure that connects the two hemispheres.
Men tend to have more myelinated axons. Myelin, a fatty deposit on a neuron's axon, speeds transmission of neural signals...
landfillpoet 2 years ago
This video is funny. I agree with the guy even though I'm a girl. I don't want any girly guy so I assume some of them don't want any "manly" girl. Relationships shouldn't be about competing with each other, but ppl should understand women's side of the argument. I think some girls just want to be able to rely on themselves because they're scared to trust a guy.
chocolatbuny 2 years ago
Thanks for your thoughtful response
The vast majority of guys don't want a "manly' girl or they would be attracted to men. Men do understand women's side of the arguement, we hear it all the time on the mainstream media how men are "little boys who won't grow up" & "can't commit"
However why should men commit? What is in it for them? What are women going to bring to the table that will make commitment worth their while?
Monad01 2 years ago
Girls not trusting men? Problem is the guys girls are attracted to usually have many other girls after them & since women are sexually liberal these days, there's much temptation.
These women scared to trust can: find a man who is not so much in demand (plenty of them around), accept a man who who won't commit or find a man who considers commitment as a priority.....however, what will a particular woman bring to the table that will make commitment worth his while?
Monad01 2 years ago
@Monad01
Both men and women should be bringing their whole self and identity to the *table* and use the strengths and attributes they have to compliment each other. If some are burned or have problems with commitment, then that is their journey to work out being attracted to women who are together and same goes for women.
Good luck in your search.
wwwpower1 2 years ago
Yes women and men should equally bring everything to the table.
But if what men experience is not the same as women and the consequences to men are different based on the same actions women might take. Therefore men's journey is different to women and consequently their views.
Monad01 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I would not have watched this if monado did not respond to me on another video. Must be nice to create a video where the man has total control and the woman makes stereotypical comments.
It is probably a mans dream to have a conversation like this without a women interjecting. Womens brains do respond faster and that is why men get frustrated when trying to discuss things.
Anyway, there is a lot of stereotypical concepts and some good ones, but their is a science reason for some too.
wwwpower1 2 years ago
These stereotypes exist because so many women make these or similar statements about men. So, exceptions of women not doing so actually prove the rule, rather than disprove it.
Monad01 2 years ago
@Monad01
I just checked back in here. Why did you remove my comment? Did something strike a nerve? because I thought you and I had good pm's to discuss our points of view.
wwwpower1 2 years ago
I didn't remove your comment, you received 6 negatives and Youtube, I assume, hides a comment after 6 negatives. You can view your comment if you click reply.
I would guess your comment got those negatives because you stated: "Womens brains do respond faster and that is why men get frustrated when trying to discuss things" then in the next sentence "there is a lot of stereotypical concepts"
Pot, kettle black. ;-)
Monad01 2 years ago
What I said about brains is based on scientific research, most books will help understand about male and female brain response systems. You can check it out.
And yes, it is true that men get frustrated because they need to process from right to left and back to right again. Womens paths between left and right are like major city roadmaps. Mens are like rural roads.
Women process faster and this makes them more efficient in multitasking and certain jobs, but not all women that is true..
wwwpower1 2 years ago
And some men are good at multitasking or process different and just as efficient, we used different brain skills do manage this.
That is why women can read facial expressions better and hear a cry or tone or pitch of voices in their babies, children and know distinctions. It is proven that men have less response to such gestures or faces. It does not mean man is better or woman is better, they have different strengths, so it is not stereotypical in the least but based on proper research.
wwwpower1 2 years ago
Women's brains respond faster to what? Correct information? Witty retorts? Reading maps? Parking cars adeptly? What? Your answer: "that is why men get frustrated when trying to discuss things."
Who gets frustrated? I could as easily say that women get frustrated with men because women tend to get more emotional rather than viewing the facts dispassionately, taking things personally rather than the topic at hand.
Monad01 2 years ago
Scientific fact: Women have more pathways between the hemispheres. Unproven stereotype: men get frustrated trying to discuss things.
I won't even disagree with you regarding your stereotype, however I also consider that women tend to get emotional rather than viewing the facts dispassionately as having equal merit.
You used the premise of the research to hypothesise and by doing so you stereotyped an entire gender
Monad01 2 years ago
One should preface with not all men or not all women fall into neat categories, that is true.
II should clarify that men can get frustrated when in discussions with women many times because they get lost.
But when they have shorter sentences or gaps it works. I know I have brothers, Uncles, cousins and friends and a husband who will all agree. But your video is full of stereotypes, so not sure here.
We should be aware of differences, but not peg all people (men or women into those)
wwwpower1 2 years ago
You used a stereotype and you are trying to wiggle your way out of it. In fact you further it by stating that men get frustrated in discussions with women and many times get lost just as I find that women take things personally by looking at the subject emotionally when discussing things with them.
I stereotyped women and you did men.
Interestingly though I usually say less words, use shorter sentences as your uncles, brothers, cousins, friends, and husband do or have longer gaps....
Con'd
Monad01 2 years ago
(because women like to dominate the conversation due to their expressiveness), until I speak about something I am passionate about, especially when I disagree, then an avalanche of speech will ensue, until I am finished, whereby I will revert to being a 'typical man' of few words. And I ain't no anomaly as it seems you haven't come across men who do express what they are passionate about.
Monad01 2 years ago
Anyway enough of men are lost with few words against women and tell me what stereotypes you don't agree with in the video?
Monad01 2 years ago
Men get frustrated when talking with women because when men make a valid point women side step the issue by changing topics or phase shift the context of what was just said.
In other words, women can't admit that they are wrong!
Yakenjokin 1 year ago 22
@Yakenjokin
Very true, alot of the time women don't want a solution to a problem or a logical argument to get in the way of their emotions in the moment, be they good bad or otherwise as solutions and logic are an antithesis to generating and sustaining those emotions.
Not that women can't be logical, its just they don't seem to have as much practice at logic as men ;-)
Monad01 1 year ago 5
@Monad01 Absolutely! And as if to prove my point power1 has tried to respond to my comment with a whole list of divergent remarks without one point actually addressing the issue I originally raised, she could not respond here so she left the comments on my channel .. You may note I left the three w's off from her you tube nic. This seems to have been a problem when she has attempted to reply to me.
I have left her comments on my channel for all to view.
Yakenjokin 1 year ago
@Monad01 Logic or reason is not the solution for the woman who has a problem. She only wants emotion, but reasoning dissolves emotion. Reasoning gives her nothing, as her life *is* the ups and downs of emotion.
Only by realising that emotions are self-perpetuating, like a vicious cycle, a woman might dip her little toe into the waters of reason. This is unlikely to happen if she is pretty, popular, and embosomed in the midst of the "smiles".
KellyJones00 1 year ago
@Monad01
Hmm, I guess some women are not bankers, lawyers, doctors, teachers, mothers who raise the kids for you or teach them or run companies.
IT ALL takes forms of logic.
What is logic? It is not just concrete set in stone rules. The human element prevails. Many women also have intuitive senses. Men can have this too, they can hone these skills.
wwwpower1 1 year ago
@Yakenjokin
Women can and do admit they are wrong. You are perhaps not meeting the right women, or not having discussions in a way that does not cause defensiveness or confrontation.
Perhaps looking at self, helps one discern language or communication issues.
I am wrong - about makiing errors, not being perfect. BUT, our lives and worth is NEVER wrong. Distinctions must be made.
wwwpower1 1 year ago
@Yakenjokin That's not an inherently female quality. Guys do that, too.
antred11 1 month ago
Also, though women's brains may respond faster than men's, this does not mean that the quality of women's thoughts is better, or what women state is truer.
Monad01 2 years ago
@Monad01
I tend to disagree on that point. Womens brains work faster and when in discussions, University discourse etc, this can be advantageous. I am in University, the young men in class do not speak as much, and the girls ususally outdo them in verbal debates, but some young men are great at these discussions, so one cannot stereotype. The more educated the more this evens out with male and female btw.
wwwpower1 2 years ago
@wwwpower1 Perhaps their brians do respond faster but rarely are those responses grounded by logic and reasoning. Maybe women should take time to think about what's been said before saying something stupid in response. But that's asking too much because you're women. My bad.
producer4real 1 year ago
@producer4real
Mind quoting what I said?
Doctors, lawyers, bankers, teachers, scientists (the most LOGICAL of human professions) are all well represented by women today.
That requires senses of logic, rational thinking and employing empathy and social diplomacy or quick responses - when REQUIRED.
I suggest you might want to look in the mirror (as I do for any man or woman) who is disgruntled with the opposite sex.
Start with self, things can only improve!
wwwpower1 1 year ago
@producer4real
Our brains respond and assimilate information faster from verbal and written works, even facial cues. It means that we are in a way nurturers who must be "in tune" with humans.
So that one can respond accordingly.
Men have strengths that aid in getting to points A to B at times faster so , that We should align those strengths and work together, for that is how we are all made. To compliment, NOT complete one another.
wwwpower1 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
cragmac1000...hey...get a sense of humor going...life is too short to be so angry about women....lol... I guess you have just been meeting the wrong kind. This video is good and true in many ways. Don't totally agree but fair is fair. Btw, I am a woman....lol. Women have a lot to offer as well as men in life. Cosmo? What's that?...:).. Take care.
linla48 2 years ago
Whenever women want to make a point they fail! They just make some statement they saw in cosmo or heard from another one of their many moronic "girlfriends" andthen parrot it back in your face in order to control the conversation the way she wants it to go, women are fucking psychotic!
cragmac1000 2 years ago 21
I love this
Popadibs 2 years ago 16