WTC7 STUDY

[sjs6494]

maybe the east side of WTC 7 didnt collapse eastwards....maybe it folded began to fold in and give the perspective of stretching out

[iantalis]

Simon, I don't know if it was here or on the old forum where someone hypothesized that the apparent CD-free falling WTC7 might have been a 'plan B set up' of some kind from the beginning. If I recall correctly your opinion was that it wasn't. I do wonder about this In view of the recent "Building What" campaign, and apparent - maybe even voluntary - scapegoating of LS ("Requested CD authorization from Ins. Co."--Claimed by FOX (lol) ). What are your thoughts on this now?

[MrSir911]

hello Mr.Tinley

[ancientkiki]

aight you got my subscription

[shoust]

Hi simonshack, looks like the the wtc7 building at 4 mins literally has an arrow on it pointing down!

[mooners40]

wag the dog

[sidar87]

at 7:05 it seems as if the buildings are ....static? It moves unnatural compared to the Camera's view.

[simonshack]

sidar87 : yes, indeed, that orange shot is awful in many ways. However, It 's not really that the buildings buildings are static : it appears that the smoke moves on its own in relation to the rest of the scenery. Several shots of the "9/11 image pool" feature similar absurdities.

[wanckerer]

Ah, that explains it. The optical illusion gives the impression the buildings infront of the smoke are nothing but an static-image. I guess i was looking at it the wrong way.

[kansasinnovember]

@simonshack if the real perps are ever brought to justice and found guilty,i hope america has the decency to recognise your work,thank you.

[simonshack]

@kansasinnovember

Thanks to you too...

[timingfunk]

the part with the reporter, was this shown on tv!? lawd...

[cosmicmind1]

I have a link to a petition on my profile to open up a new investigation into 911, you have the option of remaining anonymous. Please sign and help spread the word, signatures from all around the world may be reviewed along with comments.

Many thanks.

1,527 signatures so far

[poochickenone]

Even look at the fire fighters, cars. No white dust.

Why did cars melt and road signs stay perfectly clean.

One more Compare the fire fighters in the picture still @ 3:10 and 3:20 to the one in the crowd at 3:14 Same location must have been shot at around the same time to different scenery's

[poochickenone]

Here is one I thought of last night. That sticks with my blue screen theory.

If Vince is at ground zero , or a couple blocks away.

Why are his cloths so clean and no dust in his hair or on his black tie. It was only a few hour after the the collapse of the first 2 building, Even after he went out for a stroll, and put his mask on, still no white dust evident on his clothing or in his hair.

[siti1ca]

Simon,

where did you get the NY1 video from?

[fullmetalparker]

, and what's strange is that they don't move at all as the plane is approaching the building, only when 'it hits'. It's a piece of amatuer footage but I don't know who it's credited to.

[fullmetalparker]

Simon, the point you make about the zoom outs is one that I have thought suspicious for years now - so many zoom outs and in which stop literally the second a plane comes into view! Incredible. What are the odds? A good example of this is a shot shown in 'Bowling For Columbine', which I'll have to find, as I haven't seen it any of your excellent videos yet. It's taken from a tall building that seems to be from an observation deck or something, and there are people standing in front of the camera

[ZXPA2]

So do you think that WTC7 had been cleared when Vince was down there ?

It sure did fall differently than the other 2, if these are actual or based on the actual collapse.

[papajoe51]

Congratulations Sir.........your videos are spot on.............Filthy money grabing Bastards.... ; - (

[simonshack]

watch?v=w4Vrsjs_cLg

[poochickenone]

at 4:51, besides the black edge, why is the roof slopping inwards to a hockey stick shape. that is the thing that caught my attention.

[poochickenone]

the networks clips of the collaps reminds me of a children book, that when you pull a tab the building the building sinks in to the page. Otherwise very animated.

[mgsfan15]

"KA-BOOM"

KA-BOOM? Like from an explosion? It sounds to me, like a loud noise, from metal hitting a hard surface. It doesn't sound like a bomb, at all.

[poochickenone]

Then why do you hear it at the same time you see it.

[mgsfan15]

At the same time, you see what?

[poochickenone]

You see the collapse at the same time you hear the collapse, it's against the laws of physics, since light moves faster the sound.

[poochickenone]

Did you edit any thing out as far as walking, I'm wondering why Vince seems very disoriented in side the building, and stays stationary when he is out side, never take more then 4 or 5 steps one way or another. Could he have been in front of a blue screen with Holly wood props as the back ground. Pretty far fetched, I know.

[simonshack]

No - no walking edited out. I would use the "far-fetched" term only in relation to the official version of the 9/11 events and its related TV footage:O)...

[poochickenone]

One point on blue screen. Vince is badly disoriented when he step out side and points at 2 buildings, he just knew 1 was going to be WTC7 and it was on fire, and about to collapse, because weren't sure if WTC7 was left or right of him and he was pointing at a blue screen. He also said (both) buildings were on fire and could collapse. left no chance of being wrong. One did collapse. I have read this, it sounds odd,or even ridiculous, I know. But......

[poochickenone]

Why wasn't there more burnt out cop cars and fire trucks, they shown only cop car, and that was the one he was standing next to, then the camera pans to the rest, no city vehicles. Why are the Mail vans not chard, and cars ten feet away are. Quit odd. you made a strong point.

[AgentNMBR39]

Yet another great research video. Keep up the amazing work Simon. If I find anything interesting I'll let you know and send you a link/video. You would make William Cooper very happy, you should give yourself a GIANT pat on the back!

[piasillo]

Love the KABOOM at 3:33!

[poochickenone]

Well Today, Obama has took military actions inside of Pakistan, and Blago is being impeached in a very unfair trail. AKA Public Assination

Your right about the impending war.

[EvilUSAandthe911Lie]

Vince is a great actor.

Maybe they should consider giving him an Emmy - posthumously - after he's executed for treason and war crimes along with the rest of the U.S. media perpetrators of 9/11.

[ThoughtCrime7]

Excellent! I hope your videos get the massive recognition they deserve asap. If the larger truth movement would allow debate on this evidence, more people would understand how controlled the media really is. Those who quash disussion on this are as bad as Fox.

[spiggitybap]

you make a good point. the "truth" movement is systematically denying and discrediting the most obvious evidence (tv fakery and no planes). controlling the truth movement should be recognized as a given to any true truthseeker. its a basic strategy, can people no longer comprehend anything that is not completely fake?

[smitty121981]

spiggitybap, New York's not even a real city. doesn't exist. In fact the everyone in the world is inside your imagination.

[spiggitybap]

what are you, some kind of genius?

[keyofdavid88]

I just went and watched it. Another 10 mins of my life down the drain listening to *STUPID* lies. PLEASE wake up marksman500.

[cs579]

total Inside Job...war games, stand-downs, nukes, paid witnesses (actors), media fakery, Congressional complicity, White House connections...keep up the good work...

send the Perpetrators to jail!!!

[Lectricboots]

wow, nice Simon. I didn't know one reporter could ooze this much BS. live and learn.

[KertonLab]

well done!

[keyofdavid88]

How did two 500 MPH kerosene powered aluminum planes running into buildings (which is SO IMPOSSIBLE its FUNNY)cause engine blocks in cars BLOCKS AWAY to MELT? How come there was supposedly a fire on ONE floor yet the whole building collapses into itself from the BOTTOM? I don't know if you're a shrill or not but you innocent people who are blind to these things, you're running out of excuses now. Its really time to WAKE UP.

[keyofdavid88]

"truthers are retarded"? excuse me? Then maybe you can clear something up for us. How is it this reporter is the only one there? How is it that fire appears in one video and not another there's a witness that says there's no fire in the building but firefighers were spraying water on it anyway? Yet, in another video there's a raging fire AND NO FIREFIGHTERS?

[streakingcameraman]

Wait, are you a bunch of idiot no planers??? Are you actually the people who believe no planes hit the towers??? Are you guys the ones who make idiot videos like this one that actually doesn't explain anything? Do you guys actually try to compare 911 to Indepence Day?

Thank you, no planer truthers are the dumbest truthers on earth. Actually, you like the retards that come in last in the special olympics. Even though you tried, you still get beat by a bunch of retards. LOL.

[simonshack]

Please note : the CBS report starring Vince was broadcast on september 12 2001.

[PollenB]

There is no question about 7:00 being a composite. Hilarious.

[simonshack]

PollenB : Apparently, there are people unable to see that...

[marksman500]

simon,

How did the fires start in WTC 7?

[simonshack]

marksman500 :

I wish I knew.

Also, how did they start in WTC5?

[marksman500]

Debris from WTC 1 ignited fires on at least 10 floors of WTC 7 & other WTC's

So if debris from the collapse of WTC 1 had NOT hit WTC 7, No damage or fires to WTC 7 were they still planning for Larry to say Pull It at the end of the day?

Just out of the blue it collapses?

What were they to use for an excuse as to why it just suddenly collapsed without ANY Fire or damage at all?

Now that would be Suspicious!

So it was luck WTC 7 was damaged otherwise they could not have pulled it off?

[streakingcameraman]

Dude, this video is actually better evidence of the distruction for a debunkers stand point. It shows the damage, it shows what happened, it's about at ground zero. Truthers are idiots.

We are talking about people who think that you have to take down a building to destroy paperwork and computers full of evidence. FUNNY, CEOs have been having shredding parties for years and nobody has ever destroyed their own building to do it.

[Skeptic121]

This video is great evidence for why WTC7 should have collapsed partially, starting on the east side with the worst fires. Instead, the west side dropped within a half second of the east side according to NIST. NIST now admits WTC7 dropped at free fall acceleration for 2.25 seconds, which means 25 meters of vertical support structure suddenly gone. GONE, across the entire building. Not gradually weakened by fire, but suddenly GONE. One need not prove motive to know a crime was committed.

[Skeptic121]

There would have been fires in WTC7 regardless of whether any falling debris hit the building. The people who brought down WTC7 were perfectly capable of setting it on fire.

[PollenB]

I'd say that they don't want to see it! Nanananana I'm not listening!!

[zack11993]

By the way, that piece of debris at 3:32 looks like it vanishes into the ground.

[zack11993]

Always look forward to your brilliant videos! Thanks.

[tuespina]

what are the music pieces at 1:37, 3:10 and 9:27 ?

[tuespina]

7:07 is not just in to color oddity in ny1 shot but obvious background layer too, and when the shake occurs we see foreground/background look retarded

[KooLxAiDxLoVa]

nice

man

i love these

busted

[mindprism]

WTH is the black roof box @03:35 that collapses 4 secs before bldg? Its not on the other shots (D Rather)

[SirBroadsword]

@mindprism

That's the penthouse, and it is in the other shots...

[Caligirl1st]

I am always very grateful for all of the time you put into your research and that you willingly share your work with us. Your work is totally opposit of the US government which by law was bound to perform yet refused. You're awsome.

[HeweHaarlemmer]

rueters sent the message early is what bbc claims lately - ?

time zones mix up - like oswald - no new info can come out !

: ) GREAT RESEARCH ***** september clues

I don't know what will come out but I believe the truth will be ridiculed : (

I think we need to pick our battles coming soon - listen kenny rogers gambler - after january _ positive vibrations

[PollenB]

Hewe - the BBC's Jane Stanley was reporting the collapse of WTC7 and it could be seen in the background. Nothing to do with Reuters. They are squirming liars.

[HeweHaarlemmer]

They sure are liars - PollenB - In the bbc hit piece titled " the third tower" bbc claims now that they were sent the info and then they show the a piece of paper - you should check it out

[PollenB]

They also claim to have lost *the* tape and then found it again - someone had put it on 2002 shelf!! :-|

[HeweHaarlemmer]

lol - the third tower is a really funny hit piece. The reporter at the start of simons WTC STUDY is really funny, but I was not there that day.

[breando1]

Lets not forget that the BBC reported live that WTC7 had collapsed 20 MINUTES before it actually did and you could see it still standing in the background behind the reporter. Just another screw up in the pre planed media psy-op.

Great video Simon,love your work.

[Yagshemash10749]

I thought you have "closed" your case, but I'm glad to notice, that I was wrong.

And again, a great masterpiece.

Hope we'll see more from you in the future.

[Ecothearcy]

more evience that 911 truth is part of the psyop. the wtc 7 anomaly is an anomaly. it wassupposed to look like a free fall demolition. so whats it covering up, what r the other videos hiding? has anyone analyzied the collapese of the 2 towers? r they fake too?

[netuno222]

another great video from you Simon, thank you so much for this research!

[poochickenone]

The amateur footage(6:31). Which was shot at least a 1/4 of a mile away. It is a prime example of the blog I left on Sept. Clues B, you can hear the collapse at the same time you see it. This would be impossible,Sound travels 1000000x slower then light. Unless it's fake, or explosives were used.

[vxvideos]

questo video lo avevo già visto sul canale di OzzybanOswald.

com'è possibile?

[simonshack]

Ciao vxvideos !

Because I initially published this video on blip tv (much better quality than youtube)

Please go to blipDOTtv and search :

"WTC7 STUDY"

[keyofdavid88]

Thank you so much!! *****

[calixtesaint]

As usual-top quality research-Thanks Simon!!

[Brugality]

Thanks Simon. Thought you had retired.. Good to see your still at it. MORE!

[HeweHaarlemmer]

: 0) another one bites the dust - do not assume what happened or maybe you will be nine eleven'd

: ) another great piece - very professional SS

[AiresQX4]

People that have a hard time believing 911 was an inside especially after seeing bldg 7 collapse is simply "RETARDED"!! That's it!

Their retards!

[skyarcher]

The 911 troll-down-thumbers are here so quickly! Well done lads - The dark beings will be pleased with your work - They might even bring an extra bowl of yummy maggots to your dungeon.

It seems nothing was left untouched/retouched. Complete control but losing marks in the execution.

Brilliant Simon!

[125nl84jpeg]

LOL Comedy

[OzzybanOswald]

There's Ace projecting again.

The 911 videos are fake. Far more than just "the plane".

[spiggitybap]

case closed. why dont people just start some lawsuits already?? this world is insane. you can bet your mothers health that if i was a lawyer id be ALL OVER this. no sane jury would deny this.

[Psy0pAgent]

"had merit" ?

[random331]

You're obviously self-discrediting now by going overboard. The plane footage you exposed had merit, but this nutty. And didn't David Shayler suddenly believe he was the Messiah to save his neck??