Kuya, how would you compare it with the VC version. I heard a lot of rumor that the non VC version is sharper than the VC one. Consequently, they said that the non VC's AF focus (Canon User) is not accurate. Is this true? Please let me know ... Thanks
Kuya, how would you compare it with the VC version. I heard a lot of rumor that the non VC version is sharper than the VC one. Consequently, they said that the non VC's AF focus (Canon User) is not accurate. Is this true? Please let me know ... Thanks!
"Deeply ribbed zoom ring"..."deceptive focus sound"...this looks more like a copy of the review posted on the-digital-picture rather than a hands-on review proper...
this guy is def paid by tamron to say this stuff... sounds too much like a salesman, all good good good and inputting a little bit of "oh i missed some shots because...."
not to mention wat he talks about here is copied from this web review word for word almost by this popluar lens reviewer
this guy is def paid by tamron to say this stuff... sounds too much like a salesman, all good good good and inputting a little bit of "oh i missed some shots because...."
Did you write the review on the-digital-picture? The review says, "Build quality is not rugged, but it is solid - very adequate I would say. The included hood is similarly built. The rubber on the zoom ring is grippy, soft and deeply ribbed." That's almost exactly word-for-word.
I just brought tamron 18-270, when i got home i compare the range with my nikon 55-200, i have the same result with my nikon at 200mm and tamron at 270. Is this normal??? suppose to be the tamron have a long range rather than nikon.
A review of a lens where we actually didn't see much of the lens. We saw an awful lot of him though, close up, FX, all sorts. Makes you wonder whether the point of this video was to see a review or to make us all watch his slobbery features for 10 minutes.....
If you're not a pixel peeper to the maximum extent and love actually making images get this lens.
I got it for less than half of the Nikon equivalents a year or so ago. Unless I need the better build quality of the Nikon will probably never buy name brand standard zooms... I could buy 3 of these for the price of one nikon 17-55... or, well if you're a photographer, you know what 1000 dollars will buy you.
Unless you have tons of money to burn for Nikon lenses this lens fits the bill superbly.
@Q124R: He sounds Filipino. That's how most Filipinos who are fluent in English sound. Singaporean accent sounds different. Well, it depends if they're Chinese-Singaporean, Malay-Singaporean, or Indian-Singaporean. Most of them sound like they have the Chinese accent.
@pinoyklubber I know, which is why I asked whether he really was from singapore, because it's singaporetechreview. haha. I'm one of 'em, so I was wondering why he lacked the singlish thing nearly every made-in-singapore singaporean has.
this lens produces kind of over-warmed colored photos. For the rest, it's a excellent lens. I got myself a perfect brandnew copy in Saigon, Vietnam for just 350$
here in ph, been playin with it never taken out the smile in my face everytime i use it.. can you have a review on 90mm macro.. contemplating on buying one.. are you disposing yours hehehe punta ako dyan by sept
I'm considering this lens for my Canon 50D to replace the kit lens. I like the fact the Tamron has internal focus. I hate how my 50D kit lens opens and closes when I wear it with a strap.
I wouldn't use this junk if you paid me to.
catalinaumbert 5 months ago
Great review! just picked up this lense and very happy with it!
ShlongKong69 5 months ago
Galing pre, may alam ka bang seller nyan>? im buying one kse ^^,
jayleccio 7 months ago
Q pls...is it worth the extra money to go with the VC version or go with this one without stabilisation...??
gigicalifornia 9 months ago
Thanks for a good review : )
Avecfort 9 months ago
di you get payed by tamron
smorris227 10 months ago
Jeez guys, settle down...its not a bad review! Although the deeply ribbed part was funny.. "Tamron 17-50 XR Di II Lens, Ribbed for Her Pleasure" xD
willtheweird 11 months ago
@4:40 can't say I've ever carried a cam like that. I'd usually like my camera up front in my sight at all times. But that's just me...
KatanaTopple 1 year ago
ok im hearing a lotta good things for picture quality..with this lens what about movie quality??
thatniggbeme7 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Kuya, how would you compare it with the VC version. I heard a lot of rumor that the non VC version is sharper than the VC one. Consequently, they said that the non VC's AF focus (Canon User) is not accurate. Is this true? Please let me know ... Thanks
zncahilog 1 year ago
Kuya, how would you compare it with the VC version. I heard a lot of rumor that the non VC version is sharper than the VC one. Consequently, they said that the non VC's AF focus (Canon User) is not accurate. Is this true? Please let me know ... Thanks!
zncahilog 1 year ago
how many times did he say "LENS" again??
stevens0music 1 year ago
dre.. pinoy ka no?? ramdam ko eh.. hahaha... salamat sa review.. keep up the goodwork!!
punksnes 1 year ago
"Deeply ribbed zoom ring"..."deceptive focus sound"...this looks more like a copy of the review posted on the-digital-picture rather than a hands-on review proper...
ahmadmuj 1 year ago
can you do anything on this lens for the Infinity Focus?
HOWTOtony 1 year ago
this guy is def paid by tamron to say this stuff... sounds too much like a salesman, all good good good and inputting a little bit of "oh i missed some shots because...."
not to mention wat he talks about here is copied from this web review word for word almost by this popluar lens reviewer
porkchopsx2 1 year ago
this guy is def paid by tamron to say this stuff... sounds too much like a salesman, all good good good and inputting a little bit of "oh i missed some shots because...."
porkchopsx2 1 year ago
Did you write the review on the-digital-picture? The review says, "Build quality is not rugged, but it is solid - very adequate I would say. The included hood is similarly built. The rubber on the zoom ring is grippy, soft and deeply ribbed." That's almost exactly word-for-word.
choey2k5 1 year ago
is this better than the sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 MACRO HSM? im deciding what to get between the two... tnx in advance...
edkuyukot 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wow...the photographs are really nice :)
thisisadi 1 year ago
Wow...the photographs are really nice :)
thisisadi 1 year ago
Sigma 17-50 2.8 is way better for mine option
jahuuja007 1 year ago
I think this guys is Tamron representative as not all Tamron lens is as good as what he said
platini87 1 year ago
his face is to close to the screen, its fucking creepy get mto the side of the video not the middle of the screen
xMrStrongCockx 1 year ago
Someone help me please...
I just brought tamron 18-270, when i got home i compare the range with my nikon 55-200, i have the same result with my nikon at 200mm and tamron at 270. Is this normal??? suppose to be the tamron have a long range rather than nikon.
DiaryofPinuno 1 year ago
After reading top angry comments, This review becomes so funny )))
BlockKent 1 year ago
No indeed, I *don't want my lens protruding and retracting unwantedly, thank you very much.
Woo-hoo! Sim Lim Square!
Thanks man
scottyea 1 year ago
Should i get this lens? or the Tammie 28-75? Can you do a review on that aswell? please? or even a comparison?
HaxXx1 1 year ago
are You drunk? dude you spoke so strange.. but the review is ok. greets
pogromcygranic 1 year ago
Really funny guy :D
dk9999 1 year ago
sir.... can you give me some websites of camera stores in singapore who sells lenses and other camera accesories...
vivalabart7 1 year ago
tamron or Pentax DA*17-50mm f2.8 ?
Rec0iled 1 year ago
Dude stop moving your annoying be natural and professional. Its like your dancing or something...
dennishron 1 year ago 4
A review of a lens where we actually didn't see much of the lens. We saw an awful lot of him though, close up, FX, all sorts. Makes you wonder whether the point of this video was to see a review or to make us all watch his slobbery features for 10 minutes.....
chrisotherstuff 2 years ago 10
Good review.
8976010 2 years ago
This guy is fuckn annoying i want to take his camera and smash it over his fuckn head!
God Dam Noob!!
STFU and just review the fuckn lens ass-wipe!
xxxbeanerxxx 2 years ago 23
Comment removed
hobateetomambo 8 months ago
@xxxbeanerxxx LOOOOOOOOOOOOOL :)
hobateetomambo 8 months ago
this guy is really annoying
ps249 2 years ago 7
we are interested on the review of the LENS not your face! by the way, nice job reading the brochure!
witzeln 2 years ago 29
Comment removed
witzeln 2 years ago
If you're not a pixel peeper to the maximum extent and love actually making images get this lens.
I got it for less than half of the Nikon equivalents a year or so ago. Unless I need the better build quality of the Nikon will probably never buy name brand standard zooms... I could buy 3 of these for the price of one nikon 17-55... or, well if you're a photographer, you know what 1000 dollars will buy you.
Unless you have tons of money to burn for Nikon lenses this lens fits the bill superbly.
martinaee 2 years ago
nice review, thanks for it, but it sounds a little like an ad - try not to talk like a salesperson :)
cubebubi 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
AlexM3J 2 years ago
Like your dick?? lol...
s044121 2 years ago
nice review, BUT the af is not fast... its ok, but nowhere close to fast... but for the money its the best :)
Everest21 2 years ago
too close to the camera bro.
1987dman 2 years ago 5
You like your rubbers deeply ribbed? Enough said lol
mvadinan540 2 years ago
hey cris, the tamron 17-50 with vc just came out, is it available there in sing? hope you can make a review very soon.. thanks
ahentepoako 2 years ago
hi chris, do you mean once you turn on the cam this lens produce the high pitch noise? or when you are focusing?
nana198 2 years ago
only when focusing.
miguel88ms99 2 years ago
pre, how much did u bought ur lens?TIA
foklat 2 years ago
hey!
I was just wondering
Are you even singaporean?
You seem to lack that singlish thing even I have going on.
Peace!
Q124R 2 years ago
@Q124R: He sounds Filipino. That's how most Filipinos who are fluent in English sound. Singaporean accent sounds different. Well, it depends if they're Chinese-Singaporean, Malay-Singaporean, or Indian-Singaporean. Most of them sound like they have the Chinese accent.
pinoyklubber 1 year ago
@pinoyklubber I know, which is why I asked whether he really was from singapore, because it's singaporetechreview. haha. I'm one of 'em, so I was wondering why he lacked the singlish thing nearly every made-in-singapore singaporean has.
Q124R 1 year ago
this lens produces kind of over-warmed colored photos. For the rest, it's a excellent lens. I got myself a perfect brandnew copy in Saigon, Vietnam for just 350$
nudawa 2 years ago
got mine a copy of the lens just this afternoon! lovin it
ahentepoako 2 years ago
Hi ahentepoako,
Just wanted know wher u bought ur lens? Just curious
Chris
singaporetechreview 2 years ago
here in ph, been playin with it never taken out the smile in my face everytime i use it.. can you have a review on 90mm macro.. contemplating on buying one.. are you disposing yours hehehe punta ako dyan by sept
ahentepoako 2 years ago
thanks for the great review, man!
kenokite 2 years ago
Pinoy ka ba chong?
acousticwie 2 years ago
Pinoy na pinoy :-)
singaporetechreview 2 years ago 4
Ayos pre! Ok yung review mo. Yan na balak kong upgrade na lens for our Canon 1000D. Pang general purpose talaga sya. Salamat sa review =)
acousticwie 2 years ago
@singaporetechreview
Haha. I knew it, there were times that your accent hinted that you're Pinoy. Great review, pare. :)
RedStrat 1 year ago
@singaporetechreview
that explains the non-Singaporean accent =)
sniperifle 1 year ago
Comment removed
CaptainSlowE92 2 years ago
hilarious when he throws his camera over his shoulder. verrrry cool way of carrying ur slr...
person33 2 years ago
$550-600? i just bought it for $420 off amazon.
craniumdesigns 2 years ago
Hi craniumdesigns,
550-600 is in Singapore dollars. That should be around the US$ 400 dollar range.
Thanks for dropping a comment.
Chris
singaporetechreview 2 years ago
this lens is really a fanstantic lens. Own one and really impressed by its performance. Great review, well done.
AlexLim7818 2 years ago
Hey, just subscribed. Should I get a Canon 17-55 or Tamron 17-50? How bout a review on that? heh
honesthua 2 years ago
Hi honesthua,
I am not sure about Canon 17-55. Is that compatible with full frame sensors? The Tamron 17-50 is for cropped 1.5,,,1.6.
I suggest you decide based on the above criteria and the price.
Kindly share your shots, FLickr site....
Chris
singaporetechreview 2 years ago
Awesome video ! Thank you for sharing .
nutier
nutier 2 years ago
this lens is awesome. especially the ribbed feature. heheehe. my mate has the model under. its good but this sounds great
BUANG88 2 years ago
heya~ great review~
but could use more technical info such as how it handles flare, ca, etc
flyingbirdman 2 years ago
Yes! Very informative and concise review!
I'm considering this lens for my Canon 50D to replace the kit lens. I like the fact the Tamron has internal focus. I hate how my 50D kit lens opens and closes when I wear it with a strap.
pnmd 2 years ago