In video #1 of this report, I find it perhaps plausible that Bush's handlers used secret technology that allows them to know the future outcome of future dates and by knowing that future outcome, they alter the present. The present is the past to any date in the future and by changing the present, they altered the future. What caught my attention was the criminal names from the "Future". Could be just a lazy way to cheat or it could be "Looking Glass" technology showing its hand. Good video.
In video #1 of this report, I find it perhaps plausible that Bush's handlers used secret technology that allows them to know the future outcome of future dates and by knowing that future outcome, they alter the present. The present is the past to any date in the future and by changing the present, the altered the future. What caught my attention was the criminal names from the "Future". Could be just a lazy way to cheat or it could be "Looking Glass" technology showing its hand. Good video.
Also not mentioned here....Dan Rather did a special for HDNET which interviewed a dozen workers at a paper plant that made the paper used for the ballots in the 2000 Florida Election. They all reported that shortly before the election they started using inferior paper - paper that was used for the punch card ballots.
Not sure understood the write-in point. What was wrong with the instructions? Regardless, why didn't the Florida Supreme Court rule to count overvotes as well as undervotes?
If all this is true, than why isn't Jeb Bush being prosecuted or even rebuked? Could he still be prosecuted? What actions need to be taken to accomplish this? Was it just unethical or was it illegal?
@zgreggz83 To prosecute Jeb you have to pursue George. History is written by the victor. You don't have to control the voter just the person counting the votes.
The Supreme Court shouldn't have stepped in to begin with, and they did declare Bush the winner by stopping the recount that they actually had no legal authority to stop. They were recounting the WHOLE STATE, you Repukes couldn't stand it because you knew you would lose.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Bush didn't steal the election. Look at the 12th amendment. Bush received less popular votes, but more electoral votes. It's only happened twice in the history of the U.S. Do your research before you make yourself look ignorant.
@soul416 They weren't counting the overvotes though, and this is one of the problems cited by the majority five of the US Supreme Court. Actually would have been big advantage to Gore to do so (i.e., Duval county), so don't know why the Florida State Supreme Court failed to order such a recount.
Hello mo-Repo, he DID steal the election. It is REQUIRED by LAW that if an election returns under the .5 difference between the 2 candidates, there is a RECOUNT. period. Gore didn't have to ask for anything, it's LAW already. He asked for them after the initial recount because those counties stated that they didn't recount them, which is ILLEGAL. They gave him the entire state to recount anyway, and AGAIN the Republicans(you) bitched and moaned and got the recounts stopped every time.
Bush didn't steal the election. Look at the 12th amendment. Bush received less popular votes, but more electoral votes. It's only happened twice in the history of the U.S. Do your research before you make yourself look ignorant.
@soul416 ....and 18 counties did not comply with Secratary of State and Division of Election standards and procedures to run their ballots through the machines a second time (just checked memory cards). So the machine recount did not recount 1.58 million votes.
Bush did not steal the election. The vote was really close, but he did not steal. Gore asked for recounting, but only in a few counties of Florida, instead of the entire state. Selective recounting is not allowed in an election. Why? If something is wrong in one part of a state, then something else could be wrong in the rest of the state. When the Supreme Court stepped in, they did not declare Bush the winner, they just ended the recounting. Recount the whole state or forget about it.
@michaeljackson200 Gore wanted to but couldn't count all 67 counties because Florida does not have a system for a statewide recount. Each county has to be asked and each county must agree and sample 1% of its ballots to dertimine in their judgment whether a recount is warranted. Due to the recount deadline such a statewide recount was not possible. Selecting just a few counties was not against Florida State law.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
George Bush WON faire and square. Period. He got the most votes! It's really very simple. Re-count after re-count proved it. Accept it. Emrace it. It's the TRUTH.
well not fair and square but he won. the outcome in not relevant, what is relevant that republican officials were making typing mistakes that mysteriously only affected the constitutional right to vote of afro americans. the people didn't got the change to vote, there was no apologie and now the ballot is replaced for a votingmachine. there is a lot of shit going on with the votingmachines and the procedure is unreliable, i would use internationl observants next election.
Did you just say International Observants? Do you mean from Irak, China and the like? International obsevers won´t do a thing. Bush doesn´t care about the UN. The solution needs to arise from the AMERICAN PUBLIC, the PEOPLE. You guys need a revolution.
i am not american, the idea of international observants is unamerican. when china will sell all her dollars and the dollar will devaluate, decouple chinese economies from dollar economies by supporting the iranian iniative to sell oil in euro's, stops accepting dollars and will demand an x number of dollars in gold, there probaly will be a revolution, but not just one, it will be complete anarchy as in the russian civilian war.
We would probably have a revolution if we were better informed. Unfortunately, our media is owned by corporations, and the internet only gives info to those who seek it. Just look at the # of views this video has and compare it to the # of views videos with Britney Spears gets. People don't know what they should be watching.
it is the truth that state sovereignty in the former confederate states decide who is a legitimate voter or not, so the exercise of your right is depending on the enforcing of your right by an official. i guess when the officials are dixiecrats..can you think of it yourself?
AmericaTops, even if the election wasn't rigged, which it seems to have been, Bush still lost the popular vote. Either way, I don't consider him my president.
dang the dog ( bush is really ... well i dunno waht to call hm but its not a good word any way fuck bush yay me, fuck bush ,yay me, vote for me , ur new president , bush rips u off for 100 billion dolalr i year i`ll do that for 1 million only:)
Yea man i agree! That asshole really should of givin u ur pants back when he had the chance! He's a stupid fat ass pants stealer! why didnt you just punch him in teh face and take ur pants back when u had the chance!?? OMG!! U Guys man idk.... Just get your damn pants back! GOD!!!!
How? He's just following the paper trail and making it public, the job of an investigative journalist. I don't see many American journalists doing that. And why isn't it reported by our media? Because they're in bed with the companies and political interests that profit from this system.
How did Bush steal the election?
The new season of American Idol premiered.
The unthinking majority have themselves to blame as much as George Bush and the Neoconservative loonies who hijacked the US in 2000.
omglollmao123 1 year ago
In video #1 of this report, I find it perhaps plausible that Bush's handlers used secret technology that allows them to know the future outcome of future dates and by knowing that future outcome, they alter the present. The present is the past to any date in the future and by changing the present, they altered the future. What caught my attention was the criminal names from the "Future". Could be just a lazy way to cheat or it could be "Looking Glass" technology showing its hand. Good video.
MrCati 1 year ago
In video #1 of this report, I find it perhaps plausible that Bush's handlers used secret technology that allows them to know the future outcome of future dates and by knowing that future outcome, they alter the present. The present is the past to any date in the future and by changing the present, the altered the future. What caught my attention was the criminal names from the "Future". Could be just a lazy way to cheat or it could be "Looking Glass" technology showing its hand. Good video.
MrCati 1 year ago
This guy was trying to make money.. nothing more.
rowland2110 1 year ago
Also not mentioned here....Dan Rather did a special for HDNET which interviewed a dozen workers at a paper plant that made the paper used for the ballots in the 2000 Florida Election. They all reported that shortly before the election they started using inferior paper - paper that was used for the punch card ballots.
zgreggz83 1 year ago
Not sure understood the write-in point. What was wrong with the instructions? Regardless, why didn't the Florida Supreme Court rule to count overvotes as well as undervotes?
zgreggz83 1 year ago
If all this is true, than why isn't Jeb Bush being prosecuted or even rebuked? Could he still be prosecuted? What actions need to be taken to accomplish this? Was it just unethical or was it illegal?
zgreggz83 1 year ago
@zgreggz83 To prosecute Jeb you have to pursue George. History is written by the victor. You don't have to control the voter just the person counting the votes.
Tellthetruth61 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I wouldn't say George W. Bush stole the 2000 election. I'd rather say Sore Loserman really tried to steal it from him. Fortunately, he failed.
AlexGudesblat 2 years ago
The Supreme Court shouldn't have stepped in to begin with, and they did declare Bush the winner by stopping the recount that they actually had no legal authority to stop. They were recounting the WHOLE STATE, you Repukes couldn't stand it because you knew you would lose.
soul416 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Bush didn't steal the election. Look at the 12th amendment. Bush received less popular votes, but more electoral votes. It's only happened twice in the history of the U.S. Do your research before you make yourself look ignorant.
smalltownclown94 2 years ago
@soul416 They weren't counting the overvotes though, and this is one of the problems cited by the majority five of the US Supreme Court. Actually would have been big advantage to Gore to do so (i.e., Duval county), so don't know why the Florida State Supreme Court failed to order such a recount.
zgreggz83 1 year ago
Hello mo-Repo, he DID steal the election. It is REQUIRED by LAW that if an election returns under the .5 difference between the 2 candidates, there is a RECOUNT. period. Gore didn't have to ask for anything, it's LAW already. He asked for them after the initial recount because those counties stated that they didn't recount them, which is ILLEGAL. They gave him the entire state to recount anyway, and AGAIN the Republicans(you) bitched and moaned and got the recounts stopped every time.
soul416 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Bush didn't steal the election. Look at the 12th amendment. Bush received less popular votes, but more electoral votes. It's only happened twice in the history of the U.S. Do your research before you make yourself look ignorant.
smalltownclown94 2 years ago
@soul416 ....and 18 counties did not comply with Secratary of State and Division of Election standards and procedures to run their ballots through the machines a second time (just checked memory cards). So the machine recount did not recount 1.58 million votes.
zgreggz83 1 year ago
Bush did not steal the election. The vote was really close, but he did not steal. Gore asked for recounting, but only in a few counties of Florida, instead of the entire state. Selective recounting is not allowed in an election. Why? If something is wrong in one part of a state, then something else could be wrong in the rest of the state. When the Supreme Court stepped in, they did not declare Bush the winner, they just ended the recounting. Recount the whole state or forget about it.
michaeljackson200 3 years ago
@michaeljackson200 Gore wanted to but couldn't count all 67 counties because Florida does not have a system for a statewide recount. Each county has to be asked and each county must agree and sample 1% of its ballots to dertimine in their judgment whether a recount is warranted. Due to the recount deadline such a statewide recount was not possible. Selecting just a few counties was not against Florida State law.
zgreggz83 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
p some1 help my pussy is wet ;] 0
charlie9393 3 years ago
INTERESTING!!! That election still pisses me off.
JIMBEUTHER 3 years ago 6
You and about 100 million others.
Otispuss2 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
George Bush WON faire and square. Period. He got the most votes! It's really very simple. Re-count after re-count proved it. Accept it. Emrace it. It's the TRUTH.
AmericaTops 4 years ago
well not fair and square but he won. the outcome in not relevant, what is relevant that republican officials were making typing mistakes that mysteriously only affected the constitutional right to vote of afro americans. the people didn't got the change to vote, there was no apologie and now the ballot is replaced for a votingmachine. there is a lot of shit going on with the votingmachines and the procedure is unreliable, i would use internationl observants next election.
bendingnote 4 years ago
Did you just say International Observants? Do you mean from Irak, China and the like? International obsevers won´t do a thing. Bush doesn´t care about the UN. The solution needs to arise from the AMERICAN PUBLIC, the PEOPLE. You guys need a revolution.
Inigobalboa 4 years ago 2
i am not american, the idea of international observants is unamerican. when china will sell all her dollars and the dollar will devaluate, decouple chinese economies from dollar economies by supporting the iranian iniative to sell oil in euro's, stops accepting dollars and will demand an x number of dollars in gold, there probaly will be a revolution, but not just one, it will be complete anarchy as in the russian civilian war.
bendingnote 4 years ago
We would probably have a revolution if we were better informed. Unfortunately, our media is owned by corporations, and the internet only gives info to those who seek it. Just look at the # of views this video has and compare it to the # of views videos with Britney Spears gets. People don't know what they should be watching.
tgreinn 3 years ago
it is the truth that state sovereignty in the former confederate states decide who is a legitimate voter or not, so the exercise of your right is depending on the enforcing of your right by an official. i guess when the officials are dixiecrats..can you think of it yourself?
bendingnote 4 years ago
AmericaTops, even if the election wasn't rigged, which it seems to have been, Bush still lost the popular vote. Either way, I don't consider him my president.
tgreinn 3 years ago
I agree. Gore won.
JIMBEUTHER 3 years ago
AmericaTop, AND YOU ARE AN IDIOT. PERIOD.
FERNANDOPATIMO 3 years ago
VOTE RON PAUL!!!!!
xxxresistance 4 years ago 3
dang the dog ( bush is really ... well i dunno waht to call hm but its not a good word any way fuck bush yay me, fuck bush ,yay me, vote for me , ur new president , bush rips u off for 100 billion dolalr i year i`ll do that for 1 million only:)
venomXrevolter 4 years ago
NATIONAL IMPEACHMENT DAY is this TUESDAY AUGUST 21st!!
Spread the word and search "v2impeach" on YOUTUBE now!
V2impeach 4 years ago
Yea man i agree! That asshole really should of givin u ur pants back when he had the chance! He's a stupid fat ass pants stealer! why didnt you just punch him in teh face and take ur pants back when u had the chance!?? OMG!! U Guys man idk.... Just get your damn pants back! GOD!!!!
Roxas383 4 years ago
Palast is a piece of shit. TOTAL FRAUD!
JRCKFSH 4 years ago
How? He's just following the paper trail and making it public, the job of an investigative journalist. I don't see many American journalists doing that. And why isn't it reported by our media? Because they're in bed with the companies and political interests that profit from this system.
breaks0 4 years ago 11
Palast rules
thAchauffeur 4 years ago 2