well the A380 is huge and it'll do what it says.. accomodate a whole lot of passengers, but they have some weaknesses. It is limited to certain airports atm due to its wingspan and it leaves a terrible wake behind making planes in line wait longer than it would for a 747.
The 787 can be used at any conventional airport and it has a lot of the latest engine technology including the serrated engine cowlings. Lookswise, i'd take it over the A380.
@timsk no, i think the a380 is much better looking than a 747
and the 'terrible wake' isnt that bad, at heathrow it doesnt effect the running that much, its not like it takes 20 minutes more for it to settle, its not a big issue at all.
Might be a dumb question but wouldn't it be more dangerous to have 2 engines instead of 4 ? Because what if both engines fail while flying? For example, the B747, A340 or A380, if 1-2 of its engines fail to function, the plane still have 2 engines left to try and make an emergency landing.
That's one of the reasons the 707 had four engines instead of two. They had pathetic thrust that could easily outdone by just two engines a decade later, but jet engines were much more unreliable back then. However reliability went through the roof since then, you've got more chance of complete hydrolic failure than both engines breaking down, hence why there are more hydrolic backup systems than engine backup units in today's plane designs.
Yeah. Big and oversize charm. The wings on that thing scare. I know that flexibility is paramount and normal, but on the A380,that notion seems to actually incite fear.
Thanks, but I was only joking, I hope you weren't offended by any mean. I think it's a great plane, it's size is just scary, not that I would run away from a chance to explore it or anything.
If you take a closer look, these things you might find on Boeing 787 Dreamliner : -More aerodinamic shape -20% less fuel with same range at mach 0,85 -Uses RR Trent 1000 -35% Noice reduction -20% Bigger windows -Futuristic wing shape -Changing LED lights in the Interior -Futuristic Interior -Advanced Turbofan Technology -Carries more than 390 Passenger -More powerful than A330
i don't see anything special about the 787....why is it so special? I looks like any other aircraft with nothing special...The exterior does not bring anything new...
If you take a closer look, these things you might find on Boeing 787 Dreamliner : -More aerodinamic shape -20% less fuel with same range at mach 0,85 -Uses RR Trent 1000 -35% Noice reduction -20% Bigger windows -Futuristic wing shape -Changing LED lights in the Interior -Futuristic Interior -Advanced Turbofan Technology -Carries more than 390 Passenger -More powerful than A330
One of my favourite boing aircraft next to triple 7,the cockpit is full glass,but when you see it,it dont have portions like boxes it looks mess to me though,but still its a dream liner;)
The 777 is like any other aircraft out there. The 787 is aimed at giving the passengers a (much) nicer flight experience - the engines are much quieter, there is interior lighting that goes through a day cycle (so say, if you were going from London to LA, and it was day in London when you took off, and evening in LA when you landed, the interior lighting would start by being blue for day, then cycle through slowly until it was orange for evening during landing. This helps your body clock adjust)
The diff different between 787 and 777 is the fuel economy. It's 20% less fuel than any other aircraft. The air in the cabin is healthier than the air outside because the Air Conditioner has Plasmacluster. If you look at the wing design, it's different with any other aircrafts.. :)
Hey, why need 4 engines when 2 are enough to fly a jet this size? Why need a double decker when 1 is enough? Well Boeing knows how to manufacturer and plan out projects like this. Airbus is too creative with their jets and aren't as used by airlines around the world. Tell you what, UPS just canceled all their A380's for 777.
to the dumb ass saying its held up by fasteners from home depot. there were having electrical problems and then came the strike that greatly expanded the time which it was going to be built! then our economy took a down fall and then boeing decided to instead of flying most of the parts in from asia to get suppliers here in the us to build the parts instead you dumb fuck. boeing rules! if it aint boeing im not going!!!
Two years late and counting. The 787 in this video was held together with fasteners from The Home Depot, now they have leared that the fasteners have buggered up the airframe and skin and is going to be a massive job to replace them,.
is the plane now able to fly, I`ve heard they had problems with the carbon skin, it brakes such easy and it should be not so flexible than steel or aluminum!???
A german university has the result but nobody ask them
Luckily nobody asked you to go anywhere... and givin Boeing's horrendous history with subsidies and trading with war criminals, Its about time there was a new player on the scene with a little bit better standards... Go Eads... and of course Bae.
yeah the safety record of airbus planes is far greater on a accidents per distance travelled basis than boeing aircraft if you count from 1970 when Airbus was formed.
my father bought yesterday a 787-800 for me, hahahahhahhahahahhahahahhahahahah you are so loosers mother fucker, hahahahaha you fucking loooser, i can fuck you until you die haahahahahahahhahahhahahhahahahahahhahhahahhahhahahhahahhahahha loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooser hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahaha looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooor hahahahahahahahahaha!!
I believe they are still working on the design it probably already on their assembly line for and Boeing will Deliver the 747-8I to i believe Lufthansa and some other Airlines
Perhaps my last comment was out of order, ignore that please. One thing I can't stand is pathetic fanboys saying "Boeing rules furever!, fuck Airbus and ther shit bag
A380!"
It sounds bad huh? But this is what we have come to people. I try to set things the way that is socially correct. This has nothing to do with new airplanes, clearly it's hatred, unadulterated racism and these appauling actions are never quelled or cease! Truly disgraceful behaviour. I wonder why I bother, nobody cares.
I could give you utter hell, curse and insult you for speaking in that manner regarding a highly respected aviation expert. However, I won't as this will only prove my point furthermore and I respect others equally. I shall leave you with a burden of guilt, which you will always bear until you become aware of what damage you've caused, and change that attitude.
And I'm certainly not an asshole, nobody can deny that.
To profit from good advice requires more wisdom than to give it...
Listen pal, you've proven yourself to be a real pain in the ass. Every video i come on about usually a boeing plane, you leave about 5 comments bashing americans/boeing/other users and you're only wasting your time because i don't care. Are you a pilot? What airline do you fly with, where are you based? How many years of experience? You clearly must know what your talking about....
Are you prized dicks still f'in here? What's the problem with you people? The A380 is in a hub to hub system. 787 is a hub to spoke system which I will not explain for a second time.
A380-800 won't break a sweat for what the B787 does - the market is entirely different. Just you idiots wait until the A350 comes along, then the controversy will really get goin'!
What an inexplicable, self-indulgent, insipid fanboy raging arguement that fails to desist. No intuition whatsoever.
So many fanboys on this relentless arguement. How can you ensue castigating outrages of technological marvels that make our skies safer? Some of you just have to be the most obnoxious and illogical people on planet Earth. THINK CONSCIOUSLY before you lodge anythin', unless you are a fool or worse a liar.
Apologies to the delicate and creative minds which make the world go round and have to endure this bullshit. Boeing, nor Airbus want this drama. Give it a rest.
Planes aren't designed for "aesthetics", the primary purpose of any design is aerodynamic co-efficients that are sleek, strong, reliable, durable, capable and prove to be safe for commercial operations. The A380 is already inservice and the B787 is yet to leave the ground. Quit talking crap - it sounds foul.
A 380 is a bit ugly... Im a bit surprised of this since its from the Fashion Capitial for the world... whats most interesting is how quickly boeing was able to mod and certify a 747 to carry the 787. when you look @ the thing it looks a lot like the A380...
Alright to all you people, the 787 and A380 are two different planes, DO NOT COMPARE them you noobs. Airbus is great and so is Boeing. Get over your selves.
Filipe, what you say is wrong. You can't compare the 787 and the a380 when the 787 isn't even done with it's production yet. No, the a380 actually isn't more fuel efficient. No, the a380 is not nicer than the 787. The placement of the cockpit on the a380 makes it look like a whale! And not only that, the 787 is gonna be more fuel efficient according to Boeing! The 787 is gonna rule....no one cares about the size of an aircraft in this day of age.
"B737W": You have the right to say what you think. I am just telling you a fact. The A380 is fuel efficient and, according to my opinion, it is a lot nicer. But hey, you americans stick to your B787 and we europeans will stick to our A380. ;)
Today Boieng announced the new delivery date as the last quarter of 2009. In the past month, Boeing took over another company contracted to make 787 body parts in Atlanta that was too slow and now some Boeing staff will go there to help get things on track. Do not forget that the first 6 aircraft will be lent out by Boeing to the first customers so they can fly it for 3 or 4 months in service to work out any bugs. That means summer of 2009, 6 of these planes will be flying in service, on loan.
I think that boeing get several problems with this plane... They can't fly this, well, for not show to the public their errors... they talk about problems with parts (THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE)... I think they are constructing a new plane...... This plane can't fly! And all people are waiting...
A U.S. Air Force decision awarding a $35 billion aircraft contract to a team including the European parent of Airbus landed like a bomb in Congress on Friday, drawing howls of protest from lawmakers aligned with the loser, America's Boeing Co.
The Congressional delegation from the Seattle area said they were "outraged." Kansas Republican Rep. Todd Tiahrt vowed to seek a review of the decision "at the highest levels of the Pentagon and Congress" in hopes of reversing it.
But more delays on Boeing 787 already added. The delays will be twice longer than Airbus A380. Boeing worries about another delays needed after the maiden flight. About 1.1 million of penalty Boeing had to pay for the delays.
I think the 787 is gonna do better than any huge fuel guzzeling plane in this day and age. That's what we need.. economical transportation. The A380 also requires all its airports to do some pretty major remodeling. I think the 787 will be the best plane out there.
I also believe that boeing is focus more on short trips from cities and towns but the Airbus is geared for long trips transcontinental trips so it will work out as the boeings bring the passengers from smaller cities and towns to the big airport then they use theA380 to get them across the long part of the trip
That's why Boeing made the 747. The 747 does not require its airports to remodel terminals. I think the A380 isn't gonna do very well. That's just me.
yea right in the 60s when it came out alot of airports remodel so that plane could be used its dimensions are just the standard now when building airports, and its now called the queen of the skys, its not really the airports that matter its the companies buying the planes and its on back order
because technology and demands have changed from the 60s thats the same argument that people said when the 747 came out, lol Ur like those people that say cars can never get better, or everything has already been invented
yep a380 is way to big once the first crass comes in its going to make so much headlines everyone will know and they better say goodbye to most of their future clients that were going to order the 380
787 ftw ...... the A350 is almost the same as the a330. all airbus does to make new planes is take a similar one and modify it instead of starting from scratch like boeing
0:02 jakiś murzyn w białym pojeździe kradnie wam boeinga
grzegorzf1 1 week ago
---Concorde's Successor---
The Future of Flight...
See channel for info...
VirginSupersonic 1 year ago
Pssst! Hey buddy.. please invest in a Tripod. Otherwise, great video! :-) Thanks!
MrAKFrost 1 year ago
i live 2 minutes away from this
xboxplaya420 1 year ago
well the A380 is huge and it'll do what it says.. accomodate a whole lot of passengers, but they have some weaknesses. It is limited to certain airports atm due to its wingspan and it leaves a terrible wake behind making planes in line wait longer than it would for a 747.
The 787 can be used at any conventional airport and it has a lot of the latest engine technology including the serrated engine cowlings. Lookswise, i'd take it over the A380.
timsk 1 year ago
@timsk no, i think the a380 is much better looking than a 747
and the 'terrible wake' isnt that bad, at heathrow it doesnt effect the running that much, its not like it takes 20 minutes more for it to settle, its not a big issue at all.
BringEllisTheHoriZon 1 year ago
Quite an ugly brute, that windscreen looks awful. Loving the Rolls Royce Trents though
morg2204 1 year ago
Remember the commercials when this was the "7E7"? Ha!
RK831 2 years ago
where was this at
americajn768 2 years ago
It was in Everett, Washington.
cruisinaltitude 2 years ago
okay thanks
americajn768 2 years ago
this was taken near the Boeing Factory in Washington right?
86Timewarp 2 years ago
Boeing Field.
usafpilot29 1 year ago
787 is way smaller airplane just wide body, compare to 747 and a380.
dreamer7871 2 years ago 2
At least it rolls ...
Ellapon 2 years ago
I love the fact at 1.27 you can hear someone fall into the bushes!
renebruunphoto 2 years ago
The day of 4 jet engines on a commercial plane is gone. Engines today are immaculately engineered.
Tampaslice 2 years ago
Might be a dumb question but wouldn't it be more dangerous to have 2 engines instead of 4 ? Because what if both engines fail while flying? For example, the B747, A340 or A380, if 1-2 of its engines fail to function, the plane still have 2 engines left to try and make an emergency landing.
sloppiexx 2 years ago
Airplanes these days are designed such that even if one engine fails, they can still easily fly with only the other one functioning.
MeanGene79 2 years ago
That's one of the reasons the 707 had four engines instead of two. They had pathetic thrust that could easily outdone by just two engines a decade later, but jet engines were much more unreliable back then. However reliability went through the roof since then, you've got more chance of complete hydrolic failure than both engines breaking down, hence why there are more hydrolic backup systems than engine backup units in today's plane designs.
s2k997 2 years ago
Thanks for the detail explaination!
sloppiexx 2 years ago
i wont be on that flight because it will crash!!!!
nosamxxx 2 years ago
There is no such thing as a 787-800 you douche.
ebohan74 2 years ago
Well, it is referred to as the 787-8.
But dont be a douche. I can see where why he added to 0s
halo2windows 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
it is going to crash on it first commercial flight. GO A380!!!!!!!
nosamxxx 2 years ago
you're an idiot...for real...
KSharp320 2 years ago
no its not. Boeing is more consistent than airbus. their airplanes are built to last. the A380 is just too big.
P8NTBALL60 2 years ago 2
Yeah and if does crash I hope you are on that flight.
coffebean94 2 years ago
They are some massive engines.
Browny217 2 years ago
I don't get why United hasn't ordered any yet.
Mark94xxx 2 years ago
their broke..
davarrl 2 years ago
sucha pretty plane though
yankeesfan135 2 years ago
I love it. Glad Aeroflot will use these instead of A380, however A380 has its own charm.
evgenijpro 2 years ago
Yeah. Big and oversize charm. The wings on that thing scare. I know that flexibility is paramount and normal, but on the A380,that notion seems to actually incite fear.
bajabenca 2 years ago
Well, that is your opinion and I respect it. Personally, I see no problems with it.
evgenijpro 2 years ago
Thanks, but I was only joking, I hope you weren't offended by any mean. I think it's a great plane, it's size is just scary, not that I would run away from a chance to explore it or anything.
bajabenca 2 years ago
Don't worry about it, mate. I know what you meant. She is a very heavy bird indeed.
evgenijpro 2 years ago
Air New Zealand will be the 1st carrier in the world to use these babies
cezza57 2 years ago
no it wont, all Nippon airways is the launch customer
firepyro2 2 years ago
Oh true..I googled to see if Air NZ are getting these planes, and we are..also on the news article it said Air NZ will be 1st carrier to have these.
Maybe things have changed..ah well, Nippon can have them 1st haha.
Sweet, thanks for the insight mate :)
cezza57 2 years ago
i dont think so, American Airlines will. They already ordered them when they first came out. you are wrong
yankeesfan135 2 years ago
I know!
cezza57 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
raykrislianggi 2 years ago
A380 is better
Airbus928 2 years ago
You have to compare this to Airbus A350 XWB(X-tra Wide Body), Not A380 lol
raykrislianggi 2 years ago
Comment removed
Airbus928 2 years ago
you are lucky to see 787
Cybermasterz 2 years ago
Looks like a Triple 7. Nothing special in exterior looks except for its unusual dihedral.
emalunan 2 years ago
it is very small to go longhaul with 744's and 773's, will it replace the 767's?
forces077 2 years ago
On some airlines, probably. A lot will probably use the 787 for fleet expansion, not fleet renewal.
In fact, 767 orders are picking up! It's actually caused by this aircraft, too! Airlines are getting sick of waiting, and orderng 767s instead. LOL
ThreeCharlieKilo 2 years ago
Comment removed
forces077 2 years ago
the a380 is using the Rolls Royce Trent 900 engines
242youngbwoi 2 years ago
By the time the 787 takes flight, it will be ready for the scrap yard.
rb21122b 2 years ago
I bet that the Airbus a380 use this Rolls Royce Trent 1000 engines..... ;)
raykrislianggi 2 years ago
i don't see anything special about the 787....why is it so special? I looks like any other aircraft with nothing special...The exterior does not bring anything new...
Boeing should make a double decker at least...
RobertsDigital 2 years ago
its saves much more feul for the airline the engenis are difrent and wings etc...
aze4 2 years ago
raykrislianggi 2 years ago
390 passenger?
I heard 290..i could be wrong tho
cezza57 2 years ago
I think so....
Maybe about 350 passenger.. But I'm not sure. Just can't wait until I ride that Dreamliner!
raykrislianggi 2 years ago
the 777 carries around 365 passengers, and yet the 787 is smaller and can carry roughly the same..?..hmmm
Yeh New Zealand has ordered some 787-9!!!!..well be the 1st in the world to fly it!!. I might bet you haha :D
cezza57 2 years ago
anyone notice that at 3:22, the callsign is clearly N787BA...??? Looks that Britsh Airways will be getting the 787 first.
tjisnumbaone 2 years ago
fly already!!!!!!!
yournameiswrong 2 years ago
One of my favourite boing aircraft next to triple 7,the cockpit is full glass,but when you see it,it dont have portions like boxes it looks mess to me though,but still its a dream liner;)
montoya6k 2 years ago
Cool video plus the thunder
rggfgjerjh 2 years ago
is the 787 replacing any other aircraft?
whats the diff between 787 and 777?
cezza57 2 years ago
787 is more fuel efficient and more aerodynamic for faster long haul. Also good for comfort like The Airbus A380.
SpartanW98 2 years ago
The 777 is like any other aircraft out there. The 787 is aimed at giving the passengers a (much) nicer flight experience - the engines are much quieter, there is interior lighting that goes through a day cycle (so say, if you were going from London to LA, and it was day in London when you took off, and evening in LA when you landed, the interior lighting would start by being blue for day, then cycle through slowly until it was orange for evening during landing. This helps your body clock adjust)
larenegUK 2 years ago
thanks for that.
i kinda already knew about the lighting, but what about size? it looks more like the size of a 767 to me.
looking forward to traveling in one!
cezza57 2 years ago
The diff different between 787 and 777 is the fuel economy. It's 20% less fuel than any other aircraft. The air in the cabin is healthier than the air outside because the Air Conditioner has Plasmacluster. If you look at the wing design, it's different with any other aircrafts.. :)
raykrislianggi 2 years ago
sweet..it looks like the same size as a 767 tho?????
cezza57 2 years ago
Yes it is... :)
raykrislianggi 2 years ago
Looks great! Can't wait till the new Boeing 747-8 comes out! :)
FreddyFerrera 2 years ago
go boeing.
araj8682 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Just another boring, twin engined, ordinary looking aircraft. Stop creaming yourselves you turds!
julianc007 2 years ago
Hey, why need 4 engines when 2 are enough to fly a jet this size? Why need a double decker when 1 is enough? Well Boeing knows how to manufacturer and plan out projects like this. Airbus is too creative with their jets and aren't as used by airlines around the world. Tell you what, UPS just canceled all their A380's for 777.
XxXDELTAxFOXTROTXxX 2 years ago
but i admit i like the engines, havent seen the GE ones yet really...only once on a clip
italianluvah83 2 years ago
im kinda the opposite, if its boeing i aint going lol...i dont know, to me i just dont like the design--it almost looks fake.
italianluvah83 2 years ago
to the dumb ass saying its held up by fasteners from home depot. there were having electrical problems and then came the strike that greatly expanded the time which it was going to be built! then our economy took a down fall and then boeing decided to instead of flying most of the parts in from asia to get suppliers here in the us to build the parts instead you dumb fuck. boeing rules! if it aint boeing im not going!!!
tturbocar 3 years ago
787 vs. A350
787 wins
FLIGHTCOMPANY 3 years ago
Why?
lukituchi 3 years ago
Cause I love Boeing.
FLIGHTCOMPANY 3 years ago 3
So in your opinion Boeing wins. Airbus is definitely better :).
lukituchi 3 years ago
Thats your opinion and I respect that!
FLIGHTCOMPANY 3 years ago 3
Thanks ;)!
lukituchi 3 years ago
Two years late and counting. The 787 in this video was held together with fasteners from The Home Depot, now they have leared that the fasteners have buggered up the airframe and skin and is going to be a massive job to replace them,.
castro1change 3 years ago
why so much dihedral? Is it just because the engines won't fit?
toddi1971 3 years ago
is the plane now able to fly, I`ve heard they had problems with the carbon skin, it brakes such easy and it should be not so flexible than steel or aluminum!???
A german university has the result but nobody ask them
Muehlenmann111 3 years ago
no way A350XWB is better than 787
aireal10 3 years ago
Agreed :D
lukituchi 3 years ago
this plane will beat the A350. if it's not boeing i'm not going.
RuthHerself 3 years ago 3
Luckily nobody asked you to go anywhere... and givin Boeing's horrendous history with subsidies and trading with war criminals, Its about time there was a new player on the scene with a little bit better standards... Go Eads... and of course Bae.
themadmanc 3 years ago
yeah the safety record of airbus planes is far greater on a accidents per distance travelled basis than boeing aircraft if you count from 1970 when Airbus was formed.
weversonman 3 years ago
The boeing 787-800 Rolls out with Rolls Royce engines. I'm telling you this aircraft is going to be a great success.
viceroytennis 3 years ago
nice video!
yuturvio 3 years ago
sorry, but who fell? Thats cool where were u standing?
redshirt012 3 years ago
i cant wait till it flies
nastynorth852 3 years ago
very nice
missamywoakes 3 years ago
watch?v=bV_V4U0iX4w
Delay Liner´s has just passed the mandated Wing Test...150% of max load...in the process to obtain the ansiated FAA Certificate.
Just a aplying load a little further...it Broke.
arsenium666 3 years ago
so it eould carry out 800 passengers not 200, then it must be better the the 777-200.
nightmare1alphat07 3 years ago
hehe that roll out was just a fake
RiverratsBEL 3 years ago
It's the real plane, it just doesn't have all it's internal stuff installed so you can't make it fly(yet).
lordvader3215 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
my father bought yesterday a 787-800 for me, hahahahhahhahahahhahahahhahahahah you are so loosers mother fucker, hahahahaha you fucking loooser, i can fuck you until you die haahahahahahahhahahhahahhahahahahahhahhahahhahhahahhahahhahahha loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooser hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahaha looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooor hahahahahahahahahaha!!
CockpitpilotB737 3 years ago
thanks a lot
a0p0a070 3 years ago
airbus and boeing are great plane makers
gmjyuir 3 years ago 3
Beautiful Equipment.
Can't wait to fly one from the left seat someday...
freakybuzz 3 years ago 3
i laugh, seeing these kids fighting ´´airbus is better!!´ ´no! boeing is´
Cmdr1234 3 years ago
i laugh too seeing them cuss about it on youtube
aznturtle1 3 years ago 4
can anyone tell me the status on the 747-8 and the 787-800?? please??
a0p0a070 3 years ago
I believe they are still working on the design it probably already on their assembly line for and Boeing will Deliver the 747-8I to i believe Lufthansa and some other Airlines
UAL4ever 3 years ago
7478 is already flying and i think 787 comes in october
virginianboy1012 3 years ago
no it isnt
letsgoshooting 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yea it does look at 7478 flyin dipshit i know things unlike u
virginianboy1012 3 years ago
your an Idiot, the 787 isnt flying yet, there still doing final testing. Neither is the 747-8 you dickhead.
letsgoshooting 3 years ago 2
Its a 787....period.
MMSband737 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No shit asshole im from america i know
virginianboy1012 3 years ago
dude what the fuck is your problem. I just said its a 787 you white haole retard.
MMSband737 3 years ago
what the hell did u call me white for i could be black or mexican i know
virginianboy1012 3 years ago
Whatever dumbshit. For whatever you are fuck you. Virginianboy? Hah, must be the name of some black mexican country.
MMSband737 3 years ago
hey, currently there doing some engine and flight dynamics testing i think
letsgoshooting 3 years ago
Sometimes I think Americans want to be hated by the whole world...
JS1200RULES 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sometimes i think this site has too many assholes, and you're one of them...
Fiberawptic 3 years ago
Perhaps my last comment was out of order, ignore that please. One thing I can't stand is pathetic fanboys saying "Boeing rules furever!, fuck Airbus and ther shit bag
A380!"
It sounds bad huh? But this is what we have come to people. I try to set things the way that is socially correct. This has nothing to do with new airplanes, clearly it's hatred, unadulterated racism and these appauling actions are never quelled or cease! Truly disgraceful behaviour. I wonder why I bother, nobody cares.
JS1200RULES 3 years ago 2
I could give you utter hell, curse and insult you for speaking in that manner regarding a highly respected aviation expert. However, I won't as this will only prove my point furthermore and I respect others equally. I shall leave you with a burden of guilt, which you will always bear until you become aware of what damage you've caused, and change that attitude.
And I'm certainly not an asshole, nobody can deny that.
To profit from good advice requires more wisdom than to give it...
JS1200RULES 3 years ago
Listen pal, you've proven yourself to be a real pain in the ass. Every video i come on about usually a boeing plane, you leave about 5 comments bashing americans/boeing/other users and you're only wasting your time because i don't care. Are you a pilot? What airline do you fly with, where are you based? How many years of experience? You clearly must know what your talking about....
Fiberawptic 3 years ago
Grow up son.
agentfazexx 3 years ago
Are you prized dicks still f'in here? What's the problem with you people? The A380 is in a hub to hub system. 787 is a hub to spoke system which I will not explain for a second time.
A380-800 won't break a sweat for what the B787 does - the market is entirely different. Just you idiots wait until the A350 comes along, then the controversy will really get goin'!
What an inexplicable, self-indulgent, insipid fanboy raging arguement that fails to desist. No intuition whatsoever.
Get out.
JS1200RULES 3 years ago
The A380 rules as much as the 787.
They're just amazing!
S7r0ng3r 3 years ago 4
the A380 is a piece of shit! The 787 Kicks ass!
c0mpshades45 3 years ago 3
i agree completly!
lgkga 3 years ago 4
Touche' man.
JS1200RULES 3 years ago
i'll be looking forward seeing those 787s in service
eagle757214 3 years ago 7
So many fanboys on this relentless arguement. How can you ensue castigating outrages of technological marvels that make our skies safer? Some of you just have to be the most obnoxious and illogical people on planet Earth. THINK CONSCIOUSLY before you lodge anythin', unless you are a fool or worse a liar.
Apologies to the delicate and creative minds which make the world go round and have to endure this bullshit. Boeing, nor Airbus want this drama. Give it a rest.
JS1200RULES 3 years ago 2
Planes aren't designed for "aesthetics", the primary purpose of any design is aerodynamic co-efficients that are sleek, strong, reliable, durable, capable and prove to be safe for commercial operations. The A380 is already inservice and the B787 is yet to leave the ground. Quit talking crap - it sounds foul.
JS1200RULES 3 years ago
great vid but a pity about the doobs dialogue in the soundtrack
fordlandau 3 years ago 4
A 380 is a bit ugly... Im a bit surprised of this since its from the Fashion Capitial for the world... whats most interesting is how quickly boeing was able to mod and certify a 747 to carry the 787. when you look @ the thing it looks a lot like the A380...
bgccnj 3 years ago
Alright to all you people, the 787 and A380 are two different planes, DO NOT COMPARE them you noobs. Airbus is great and so is Boeing. Get over your selves.
meRyanP 3 years ago 4
Filipe, what you say is wrong. You can't compare the 787 and the a380 when the 787 isn't even done with it's production yet. No, the a380 actually isn't more fuel efficient. No, the a380 is not nicer than the 787. The placement of the cockpit on the a380 makes it look like a whale! And not only that, the 787 is gonna be more fuel efficient according to Boeing! The 787 is gonna rule....no one cares about the size of an aircraft in this day of age.
B737W 3 years ago
"B737W": You have the right to say what you think. I am just telling you a fact. The A380 is fuel efficient and, according to my opinion, it is a lot nicer. But hey, you americans stick to your B787 and we europeans will stick to our A380. ;)
Filipe112 3 years ago 4
Airbus A380 is way better, quieter, fuel efficent and a hell of a lot nicer than B787, although B787 is pretty good too.
Filipe112 3 years ago
lies!
lewisduncan93 3 years ago 3
how do you know what it sounds like? theyre not even out yet
rutgersfan7 3 years ago 3
787 only has 2 fuel efficiet engines while A380 has 4 engines which are the same
Erik0219 3 years ago
a380 = euro shit
RoidinRichie 3 years ago
thats sweet
rutgersfan7 3 years ago
they are beautiful!
buzzmanRod 3 years ago
Today Boieng announced the new delivery date as the last quarter of 2009. In the past month, Boeing took over another company contracted to make 787 body parts in Atlanta that was too slow and now some Boeing staff will go there to help get things on track. Do not forget that the first 6 aircraft will be lent out by Boeing to the first customers so they can fly it for 3 or 4 months in service to work out any bugs. That means summer of 2009, 6 of these planes will be flying in service, on loan.
CREDITS4CARBON 3 years ago
I think that boeing get several problems with this plane... They can't fly this, well, for not show to the public their errors... they talk about problems with parts (THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE)... I think they are constructing a new plane...... This plane can't fly! And all people are waiting...
yogods 3 years ago
When will flys this shit???
1 year of delay... Very shit!
yogods 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A U.S. Air Force decision awarding a $35 billion aircraft contract to a team including the European parent of Airbus landed like a bomb in Congress on Friday, drawing howls of protest from lawmakers aligned with the loser, America's Boeing Co.
The Congressional delegation from the Seattle area said they were "outraged." Kansas Republican Rep. Todd Tiahrt vowed to seek a review of the decision "at the highest levels of the Pentagon and Congress" in hopes of reversing it.
BOEING=LOSERS.
arsenium666 3 years ago
Wow, all you do is go around on youtube bashing Boeing videos huh. Get a life frenchie.
almickw 3 years ago 3
Look at that thing of beauty
rodgerjohnson 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE 787 DELAY LINER
Boeing keeps repeating the same during the 3 Delay Announcements of the 787 project: "We are just INCOMPETENTS, what more can you expect from us?"
Now 9 MONTHS DELAY!!!
arsenium666 4 years ago
airbus has no delay?
dreamlover55 3 years ago
But more delays on Boeing 787 already added. The delays will be twice longer than Airbus A380. Boeing worries about another delays needed after the maiden flight. About 1.1 million of penalty Boeing had to pay for the delays.
Donz5885 3 years ago
I think the 787 is gonna do better than any huge fuel guzzeling plane in this day and age. That's what we need.. economical transportation. The A380 also requires all its airports to do some pretty major remodeling. I think the 787 will be the best plane out there.
orcamistress101 4 years ago 2
I also believe that boeing is focus more on short trips from cities and towns but the Airbus is geared for long trips transcontinental trips so it will work out as the boeings bring the passengers from smaller cities and towns to the big airport then they use theA380 to get them across the long part of the trip
Crusher103 4 years ago
That's why Boeing made the 747. The 747 does not require its airports to remodel terminals. I think the A380 isn't gonna do very well. That's just me.
orcamistress101 4 years ago 3
yea right in the 60s when it came out alot of airports remodel so that plane could be used its dimensions are just the standard now when building airports, and its now called the queen of the skys, its not really the airports that matter its the companies buying the planes and its on back order
Crusher103 4 years ago
my point exactly. now that there is a standard airport size.. why should it be changed again?
orcamistress101 4 years ago
because technology and demands have changed from the 60s thats the same argument that people said when the 747 came out, lol Ur like those people that say cars can never get better, or everything has already been invented
Crusher103 4 years ago
So people want a fuel guzzling plane instead of a more economic plane. makes a ton of sense to me.
orcamistress101 3 years ago
yep a380 is way to big once the first crass comes in its going to make so much headlines everyone will know and they better say goodbye to most of their future clients that were going to order the 380
rodgerjohnson 3 years ago
they said the same sort of thing about the original 747 mate and look how many of them are flying today...
grahamkeithtodd 3 years ago
787 ftw ...... the A350 is almost the same as the a330. all airbus does to make new planes is take a similar one and modify it instead of starting from scratch like boeing
joelgalva8 4 years ago
don't compare this small plane to a giant,you'll do it when the a350 will be redy in 2 years...
sierramibenge 4 years ago
i dont get it.. the 787 & A350 are similar in size
joelgalva8 4 years ago
you better go to check your book! the a350 gonna carry nearly the same as b777 and more efficient, they won't be to the same level...sorry!!
sierramibenge 4 years ago
i might be wrong ill look it up then
joelgalva8 4 years ago
but i wasnt talking about passengers i was talking about design.
joelgalva8 4 years ago
you can go to google images and check the new design of the a350... i think you gonna be surprised! it's not looking like a a330,believe me!!!
sierramibenge 4 years ago
i know i seen MANY MANY pictures. They changed the nose & now its more like a 787 nose
joelgalva8 4 years ago
american,you r stupid poeple.
sierramibenge 4 years ago
I guess thats why we are the strongest country in the world lol
Crusher103 4 years ago
lovly looking plane but i think that the cockpit should be a bit simpler
samgrosvenor 4 years ago
this is gonna kick the a380's ass
alexmun133 4 years ago 4
Boeing is the best "LA AMO"
delivert93 4 years ago
Still better than Airbus. The A380 is delayed for two years.
buybygb 4 years ago 5
now look so is the 787!!! it happens every time... like a women's period.
mikel1982 4 years ago
the a380 is alredy the best coz it s the biggest in the world!!!
sierramibenge 4 years ago
The A380 is also the biggest in delays.
buybygb 4 years ago 2