Oh Woman Oh Why? (REMIXED) by Paul McCartney

[badback3]

It grows on you the longer you listen to it.

[CulworthStreet]

I don't think it's an remix by Paul McCartney. It's the original version of Paul's "Oh Woman, Oh Why" but much faster. That's the only difference, actually it's completely the same song.

[Khultan]

 Whooooooooooooooooooooooo!!! : )

[KaptSonic22]

Doesn't have the same "punch." Nice idea tho

[lonelylondonladfan]

FAIL!



[BadLeaders]

The impact is lost. Remixing this song is a bad idea.

[hildaMcCartney]

MIJITO RICO!!!!!!!!!

[TheRavenswoodjones]

funny, YOUR version sounds more like how I remember the song...its been years since I heard it and thought about it the other day and came here looking for it. Great eFfing job!! I'm a musician/record producer {to all of you other rude creeps}

[Sesamox]

I prefer the original, but hey, you haven't forbidden us to listen to it. Thanks for sharing this, its a very interesting version, I've enjoyed it a lot.

[rekrage]

Too Fookin Fast!!

[catman08012]

Very interesting but like others i agree that you have taken away the vital groove that this song has in its natural state. You've taken a classic groove and turned it into a Devoesque rant.

[TenderAce]

I don't like it...dismiss it, delete it

[bgumbyguitar]

How is a crappy tempo change a remix? you altered a remix.

[getback9691]

This sucks! Boy, did you soil a great song!!!

[capitolemiproducer]

This song was butchered courtesy of Audacity. Tempo change really sucks

[PrettyLittleHead]

You should add some grind from the MONO version of this song...It is much better than the stereo...it was interesting to hear how you maintained the vocal pitch while still speeding up the tempo...If you take the tempo from your version & the original, somewhere in between might be interesting to hear...Either way, nice job. This is the BEST MCCARTNEY song ever...I would take this one over BOTRun, Yesterday, HeyJude anyday... :)

[RaamBramm]

Just awful.

[Khultan]

I heard your version first, Blountb1, then the original. It's all good!!! : )

[blountb1]

@Khultan Thanks, I enjoyed playing around with it. I slightly remixed it by not only increasing the tempo but also switching around the tracks and adding a few other effects with a sweet little program called Goldwave. :)

[Khultan]

@blountb1 Aw, man, it's sooooo much : ) I have never heard of this number, it's fantastic. Hey, I see that you've got alot of flak for being creative, you got your kevlar on ya, ha ha ha....just teasing....for real, I love your version and the original...ROCK ON!!! Never mind those haters LOL

[Khultan]

Hell YEAH, ROCKIN PAUL!!!! : )

[gittahfiend]

not remixed.SPED UP !

[blountb1]

@gittahfiend Yes I slightly remixed it by not only increasing the tempo but also switching around the tracks and adding a few other effects with a program called Goldwave.

[nyquildrinker]

sucks!!!!

[TaniisS1]

a paul mccartney ho my LoOve

[gooshala]

I always loved it especially the slow tempo. This gives us a chance to hear it at a faster tempo but retains the vocal in the original key. I"m not putting you down. It's interesting but I still prefer the original. Thanks for posting it .

[capitolemiproducer]

WHat this bozo did was use audacity and change the tempo. This sucks!!! If you want a rare version look for the promo mix

[blountb1]

@capitolemiproducer Actually this "bozo" used a program called Goldwave and a few other effects to change the song around a little...if you don't like it you have every right in the world to say so but geeze , have a little decency to be polite about it. If you don't like what I've done then don't listen to it, you don't have to be hateful about it...man, what a prick! :(

[maximum1954]

Horrible version. Just sped up. It's lost it's groove. Sorry. I complete miss. I must end it here it's making me sick.

[blountb1]

@maximum1954 This goes for you too, if you don't like it you have every right in the world to say so but geeze , have a little decency to be polite about it. If you don't like what I've done then don't listen to it, you don't have to be hateful about it either. :/

[maximum1954]

blountb1. I mean come on, I simply said it is a, "horrible version", and, "it's making me sick. You have to except criticism if you are going to COMPLETELY change the tempo of a song. It sounds like the chipmunks. I mean why don't you completely change the ending of the Wizard Of Oz? Why mess with anyone's song? What's the point? I think you have to accept the critiquing if you are going to change someone else's song. I love the song the way it was recorded. Leave it alone.

[Khultan]

@maximum1954 Dang, you didn't have to visit, you could've gone somewhere else instead of giving this guy grief. Jeez...: (

[Khultan]

@maximum1954  So, go ahead and get sick and die quietly. LOL

[reverendflash]

The intro almost suggests a possible mashup with Billie Jean.

[Lonette]

Awesome. I can see The Pretty Beatle doing it this way.

[maxbatch70]

the lyrics "....woman oh why, where did you that gun..." susmariosep (jesus,mary&joseph) good the husband, bf, lover was not shot, anyway, i was 2nd year in college when i heard this song, a great song, but with deadly lyrics

[koldkockrecords]

Thsi is one of favorate Mc.Cartney early tracks.  I love this remixed version too. Sounds fucken cool......

[blountb1]

Thanks! I had alot of fun doing it! :)

[fordboy0]

Nice work, but I still prefer the original. :)

[blountb1]

Ha, well thanks anyway :)

[justinlom]

awesome

[blountb1]

Thanks! :)

[vulcanicspice]

Great remix! I already loved the song (and Paul's vocals, good God!), and this makes me love it even more, the pace and the power is great :)

[blountb1]

Thanks, yeah this is one of my favorite remixes I did! :)

[emeraldprophet]

Didn't he use a real gun while recording this?

[blountb1]

I'm not sure, I tried to research it bur couldn't find anything about that, it sounds like a toy pop-gun to me :o)

[NicNac13c]

starter pistol