Your comment to TangoMujer's Silk leads me to believe you are not familiar with Argentine style Tango. The women are dancing tango, without the music obviously, pretty much the entire piece. It's unfortunate, I think, when the camera is zoomed to focus on their upper bodies, because it loses the lower half of the dance. However, I agree with varotango and psyclopsia, a very beautiful piece.
gsg0042 - Two ladies getting together to do some Volcadas, Enganches, Giros and Boleos doesn't mean they're dancing tango. If you think so, you certainly don't understand tango. This is 'modern dance' incorpoarating some well-known tango elements. But it's not tango.
This is really dumb art. Call it tango, call it anything- doesn't matter, it's lacking on every aesthetic level.
belltheory 3 years ago
absolutely stunning.
psyclopsia 3 years ago 2
i like it!
varotango 4 years ago 2
I think you might be the only person who does.
Why do they put 'Tango' in the title? I didn't see it.
Tang0Lover 3 years ago
Your comment to TangoMujer's Silk leads me to believe you are not familiar with Argentine style Tango. The women are dancing tango, without the music obviously, pretty much the entire piece. It's unfortunate, I think, when the camera is zoomed to focus on their upper bodies, because it loses the lower half of the dance. However, I agree with varotango and psyclopsia, a very beautiful piece.
gsg0042 3 years ago 2
gsg0042 - Two ladies getting together to do some Volcadas, Enganches, Giros and Boleos doesn't mean they're dancing tango. If you think so, you certainly don't understand tango. This is 'modern dance' incorpoarating some well-known tango elements. But it's not tango.
Tang0Lover 3 years ago
I agree completely. Tango is not about two women doing tango steps. They miss the essence.
balletbox 2 years ago