Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.
CHURCHILL IS AN EVIL FUCKING CUNT & WAR CRIMINAL THAT ORDERED THE BOMBING & GENOCIDE OF OVER 500,000 German Children, Women, Men, Elderly & even all the animals in DRESDEN!
@natezeppo No mate the western allies should have done what the russians did and burnt Germany to ashes and anyway Britain and Germany would not have been able to defeat the USSR.
CHURCHILL is a fucking WAR CRIMINAL for the HOLOCAUST OF BOMBS DROPPED ON DRESDEN & GENOCIDE of 500,000 Aryan Germans! FUCK the Treaty of Versailles & the FUCKING EVIL ZIONIST ANTI-CHRISTS with their FAKE HOLO-HOAX, just an excuse to INVADE PALESTINE! WHITE POWER for the people of Germany!
Elberiver is never right. He is a nazi sympathiser with a pathological hatred of Britain, Churchill and all things British. He would not know what truth is if it leaped out and smacked him over the head. Avoid this person, his 'history' lessons are full of flawed reasoning and unfounded assertions.
We all need to learn history, but at school, only 'history' that is favourable to our countries is taught. You need to dig deeper, and look for truth. You are not likely to find it, but you may start to get close and understand that we all have history that is buried because it is so shameful.
I am not convinced that Hitler was the worst wartime leader, Stalin probably killed more that he did, and he was 'on our side'.
I'am tired of hearing people bitch about who saved who or who won what. At the end of the day can't we all just sit down. Have a pint or two AND KILL SOME COMMUNISTS!?
ELBERIVER11 - Thanks for the history lesson (yawn). Your 'sources' are nothing but a pack of lies from Nazi - friendly historians and right wing journalists. Fact: I DON'T BELIEVE YOU. Fact: YOU are a LIAR. Stop trying to change the facts of recorded history with propaganda.
The ex-Kaiser Wilhem 11 went on to advocate a "regular international all-worlds pogrom à la Russe" as "the best cure" and further believed that Jews were a "nuisance that humanity must get rid of some way or other. I believe the best would be gas!" How very prophetic....perhaps little ex-Corporal Hitler heard about this, too?
As the "nice" Britain allowed the Polish enemy to block trade and passengers on German soil, Eastprussia had to set-up the "See-Notdienst Ostpreussen" ("Sea-emergency service Eastprussia") to bring the goods via the sea, because Poland blocked trade.
But this was expensive, so Eastprussian goods became to dear and nobody bought them any more. Many German families sank into poverty. This was the deed of the "harmless" Versailles crime. Why does your country not teach any of that., Rod?
@Elberiver11 Why? Because it is obscure and abstruse history known only to academics like yourself, but in your case it is the academia of a long forgotten and bigoted elite. These days, nobody really cares about these poor German people who were resetlled after the War, they were a side show of history compared to the Communisation of Europe and the march of millions of refugees to new lands...it wasn't only Germans who suffered, you are only stressing one set of unfortunate people. Bigot!
@DorsetRod This man comes from the country who has been fouling and besmirching our national honour for over 100 years, with all their lies they spread about us, and then he calls me a "bigot"? Well that is quite a bit much, isn't it.
Mister DorsetRod apparantly does not know that his country's "Lampshade"-story, aimed to insult and blacken our name in the world, has long time ago turned out to be a Britsh lie. Like so many other lies.
@DorsetRod This is typical English and American: They spread on their TV and teach in their schools 1000 times a day "the Germans are bad people" and "so many people suffered under the Germans" and likewise.
So how much makes 1000 times 365? After a year only, i reckon the English and Americans have told this nearly half a million times.
Now let's make a change and tell the world not about crimes BY Germans, but those crimes TO Germans, and then they get angry! like Rod does.
In British schools and TV, where they tell people that Churchill never massmurdered children, never dropped Napalm on innocents and has no guilt for both world wars, the also tell their people 1 Million times per year about "crimes by bad Germans".
Now look at DorsetRod's reaction: When after 1 Million "bad germans" TV shows you tell them about crimes of the other side too - something completely hidden in Britain - then they say "oh you are really one-sided, arent you".
Churchill and Stalin killed 3 Million German civilans after the war, but not just "executed" but A) either slowly starved to death B) or tortured to death like put in barrels with nails rolling downhill C) or simply perishing at the edge of the road after e.g. the Brünn death march.
All these atrocities and crimes, dear Rod, to our people, remain deliberately covered-up by your countries USA and Britain.
@DorsetRod I do not agree, Rod, with your whole nation not only lying about these millions of people murdered by Churchill, but even spitting on our graves and fouling the commemoration of these victims.
"tt was not only Germany who suffered", a most peculiar remark considering we see 1 Million times a year the "poor british/Jews". But about what the "poor British" did in Yalta 1945 etc. we do not even see for once.
And then he insinuates i was to "one-sided", and claims his country was not.
@DorsetRod So please do not reproach me for telling the truth about Churchill. Rod. Those who tell truth are not the bigots. Those are the bigots, you prefer to sweep the truth under the carpet, and i am sorry but your whole nation does.
Churchill murdered almost 3 times more children and women together with his friend Dictator Stalin, then died in Auschwitz.
Also notice another British lie: After the war the British claimed, 4 million died there. Today we know, this number was a lie.
@DorsetRod My proof is for example any encyclopedia, or try the memorial plate at Auschwitz, which says 1.5 Million.
A few years ago, your country had claimed it was 4 Million, and the memorial plate said the same.
So during fog and night, they simply changed this plate. But where are the remaining 2.5 Millions, murdered by the "bad Germans"? Your country kept insulting and fouling our reputation, claimng it was 4 Million. Today we know, its 1.5 Million. How do you explain that?
@DorsetRod 600 000 - 800 000: murdered in German cities (mostly children and women and elderly, Churchill preferred fighting them over men)
After the war:
2 Million in the Yalta-Genocide
1.7 Million in Anglo-american death camps
Another 1 Million in Soviet camps
If you just count the German civilians and POWs together who were murdered or tortured to death after the war, then you have more than 3 times this number.
Why dont you read some books? You dont need me for this, do you?
@DorsetRod Try Prof. Dr. Alfred de Zayas, an American professor for international law, who was member of the UN-Commission for human rights. So, i dont think its a bad source. Certainly a better source than these weird TV-shows you saw about "germans made lampshades". lol
Professor de Zayas wrote a lot about the Genocide that took place after the war. Also the Bundesarchiv would be good, but as you dont speak German it won't help you a lot.
@DorsetRod Another good source would be British historian Giles MacDonough. He is a regular contributor for The TIMES and many other British media.
As you see , i only use sources from your countries, from America and Britain. (which are not my countries, no matter what you keep believing). I would never use a German source, because you would slander anything coming from our country as "nazi"-source, wouldn't you.
So i hope a journalist for The London TIMES is not a Nazi-source for you, Rod!
@DorsetRod If you type in Google: How 3 million Germans died after VE day,
then you get an article in the British Telegraph about Giles MacDonough and his books.
By the way, i dont care if you keep denying what i say. I know that i speak the truth, and if you do not like the truth, fair enough.
Notice: I do not hate the British or the Americans, i simply do not accept their lies, and their constant attemtps to foul and slander my nation. I have the same right to love my nation like you do.
@Elberiver11 You're a pathological LIAR. NO Germans were exterminated in concentration camps after World War 11 by Britain or America and Churchill had NOTHING TO DO WITh the Lusitania incident. You sicken me with your appallingly TWISTED view of history. You will do anything to support your insane theories and most of the authors you cite are discredited holocaust-denying Nazi sympathisers, so WHY should anyone believe you? Cretin, liar and apologist for Nazi war crimes...ANALRIVER11. .
@DorsetRod Churchill had nothing to do with the LUSITANIA fraud?
It's appalling how little you Britishers and Americans know about your own history. Winston Churchill was 1st Lord of the Admirality, which means nothing more and nothing less than Commander of the British fleet, my dear.
He was the one who sent the LUSITANIA, a battle ship disguised as "civilian"" ship, into the war zone, knowing the Germans would sink it and thus create outrage in the USA.
@DorsetRod So what's "twisted" about revealing the FACTS, Fact which you and your countries (America and England) aim to cover with a great dark cloak? Are you denying that Winston Churchill was 1st Commander of the British Fleet and 1) mobilized the British fleet before the "bad" Germans did it, 2) tried to drag America into war because Britain was depleted and 3) thus sent the LUSITANIA into the war zone?
If you deny all that, my dear Rod, then it is you is the denier - not me.
@DorsetRod The BBC British Broadcasting Corporation brought a whole documentary series about the LUSITANIA deception, already years ago. All of Britain knows it, that the LUSITANIA was Churchill's attempt to create war between America and Europe. All of Britain, except you.
And according to you, the BBC is one of my "nazi"-sources, right?
Man, you should stop insulting all Germans as Nazis. It's pathetic.
I dont call you Americans and Britishs "slave trading racists", do i?
@DorsetRod YES , Germans were exterminated in death camps, and i can even tell you where they were: near the town of Sinzig on the Rheinwiesen (Rhine Meadows), under the Command of your American massmurderer Eisenhower.
I should know, because my own Grandfather was murdered by you in one of those camps, and this was long time after the war was over! It was a French camp, and the French, the Americans, the Poles, the Czechs and Russians ALL had concentration camps .
@DorsetRod the fact that my Grandfather (who had done nothing wrong, except fighting your fine French friends who started war on US, not we on them) was married to a Jewish wife, did not disturb the "good" Allies. She was arrested too, because they were on French territory.
Proof that your wicked countries USA, Britain and France never started war on us to "save the Jews", as you claim. In fact, you Americans and Britishers closed the doors for Jewish immigrants in 1938.
@DorsetRod Nazi war crimes? How can i "apologize" for them, when i dont even talk about them, you moron?
Nobody denies Nazi crimes, at least not my country. Germany does not deny anything, you sick racist man. But YOU and your country deny YOUR warcrimes. Your wicked pig Harris deliberately killed 1 million children and women alive, together with your fine Yankee friends.
But of course, this is not a warcrime, is it. According to Mr. Rod, we DESERVED IT.
@Elberiver11 dude, the nazis invaded poland, and Austria and ceschslovakia. The uk where allies with Poland so had to defend them, war ensued, so the fault of the war is with Germany and is therefore the fault of the nazis.
@mrmemanme Not quite that simple, the seeds of WW2 were sown at Versailles, and in the Washington treaty. Nothing is as simple as 'x attacked y so the war started'.
The naval blockade of Germany throughout 1919 set up a lot of the problems, as did the French demands for reparations.
We were all conned by the political classes of each nation.
@harryfaber yeah i know, but look up Gustav stessmen, he was a German Chancellor of the Weimar republic, he solved hyperinflation, lowered the reperarions and made everybody trust Germany again, i feel sure that if he had not died and the depression had not occued then ww2 as we know it would have been avoided.
@mrmemanme Sadly, history is littered with 'what might have been', WW2 'as we know it' would not have happened if the British & French had shown some opposition to the re-militarization of the Rhineland, Czechoslovakia, the Anschluss and so on. However, what we will never know is what would have happened if, for example, German scientists had more time to prepare, or had taken a strategic instead of tactical view of the likely requirement for weapons to fight 'the war'.
@DorsetRod You cannot deny that we sent the Cossacks back to the Soviets knowing that their future was 'not secure'. You may also want to look at how we treated known Nazi criminals. The ones who were useful to us were quickly forgiven and put to work for us, the ones we didn't like were executed.
We have much to be ashamed of, but 'history is written by the victor'.
@harryfaber I think you should state what your sources are for the claim that 'we' sent 'Cossacks' back to the Soviet Union. Also which Nazi war criminals 'we' forgave and put to work for 'us'. If you are referring to the way in which the US government made sure that Werner Von Braun and several other V2 rocket scientists were whisked off to the USA and put to work on the missile programme and the NASA space programme, before NATO was formed in 1949, that is not working for Britain, is it?
@DorsetRod Anthony Eden. Many 'German' soldiers were found to be Russian, Ukrainian and so on, we returned those that Stalin demanded.
It was not just the rocket programme, there were lesser Gauleiters and industrialists who were whipped through the processes a bit 'smartly', and put back to their former work. The directors of AG Farben spring to mind, as does Julius Dorpfmuller. Elberiver is right to point some blame at all countries. Strive for truth, and avoid 'headlines'.
@DorsetRod also google "Eisenhower's death camps". Your American friends had real extermination camps in Germany, along the Rheinwiesen (Rhine meadows). Eisenhower later on became president of the US.
It seems to me, having a criminal record for being a million-fold massmurderer, you have best chances to become American president! lol
@DorsetRod you have enough sources now, i doubt that you are really interested, so i wonder why i should go out of my way when i believe that you are not really interested anyway.
In case you are, there are lots of good sources. Also try Professor Higgs, who wrote about the Americans lying about Pearl Harbour.
And Churchill lying about the LUSITANIA, sending a British ship packed with children and women deliberately into the warzone in 1915, was even on the BBC a few years ago.
@Elberiver11 We also do not teach much about the naval blockade of Germany throughout 1919, and the starvation it caused during the influenza crisis. I rather think that all countries only teach those parts of history that are 'glorious' and not some of the less savoury parts of the story. The way that the victorious powers treated Austria nd Germany set up many of the greivances that fueled the desire for the 2nd WW.
It is very 'cosy' to blame just the Germans, but wrong.
This is only a fraction of what the British-American Versailles enslavement plan did to millions of families. And you people dare insult our mass-graves, murdered by this warcriminal Winston Churchill who threw screaming children into the Firestorm alive.
I am glad i am German and NOT British or Yank , because we have , unlike you people, noting to reproach ourselves for. We never attacked America or Britain, both nations started war on US, not the other way round, as you falsely claim.
know what kind of things are taught in Britain and USA, Rod: Germans are bad people and the British are god's chosen people with a clean slate.Good grief! To think i used to believe that nonsens, because guess what, mate: German schools teach the same garbage, as we are an occupied country. But if you bother read scientific books, you will find that Britain and America wrote a history of fraud and cover-up.
Both world wars are British and American guilt - not ours. Lie about it all you want.
If you had any clue about how the British Empire deliberately created hate, murder, civil war, refugees and invasions between Germany and her neighbours especially on her eastern border, then it's for the blind to see that these borders were meant to create war - desired and carried out by the British Empire and her nice American friends in Versailles and St. Germain 1919.
But of course the British have no clue about what they did. They are too busy to lay their blame on someone else.
@DorsetRod Our great Monarch Wilhelm II, fouled, besmirched and betrayed by our "nice" British friends, was a King of Peace. Before the British started war on him in 1914, he did not fight a single war.
But the British, at the same time, fought countless wars, tried to make China drug-addicts in the OPIUM-war, they murdered millions in India and started war on the Boers in 1899 - 1902, set up British concentatrion camps and more. Britain: A true belligerent Empire of wickedness and murder.
@DorsetRod so if our Emperor was known to be peaceful, while your evil British Empire was known to be a most belligerent villain - how much credibility do you think have the accusations if they come from a British of all people? LOL Not very much, my friend. The British Empire killed more innocents in British-India only, than Adolph Hitler ever killed Jews. That is quite an achievement. And yet, nobody knows Lord Lytton. Why? Because the British are a false and dishonest people.
On 2 Dec 1919, following his abdication, the Kaiser wrote to Field Marshal von Mackensen, denouncing his abdication as the "deepest, most disgusting shame ever perpetrated by a person in history, the Germans have done to themselves", "egged on and misled by the tribe of Judah ... Let no German ever forget this, nor rest until these parasites have been destroyed and exterminated from German soil" .
While a Polish-German war was going on, Britain used this pretext to subjugate Germany and wipe her economic rival off the map. Germany, who did not want war with England, made countless peace offers to England, but Churchill refused - Churchill wanted war.
He ignored all German offers and dragged the USA into war, thus turning a war between Germany and only one neighbour into world war.
Churchill is a criminal and should have been hanged.
British politicians had caused starvation and masspoverty in Germany since 1919, they placed over 5 Million Germans under the Tyranny of Aliens.
2.1 Million were placed under Polish yoke and 3.5 under Czech rule. It was the British who caused this mess in 1919 with their Versailles dictate, they forbade democracy in Danzig, Saarland, Sudeteland and others, note the Saarland was occupied by Britain's filthy french friends.
The British forbade democratic elections and called it "democracy".
@Elberiver11 Lies, all lies from a master propagandist whose grandfather was a high ranking offical in the Nazi party and escaped a war crimes tribunal by the skin of his teeth. Yes, blame all of the Versailles Treaty conditions, ratified by many nations, as a totally British scam. Saarland was a legitimate occupation for the French, it had fuck all to do with the British government. The French had suffered horrendously in WW1, I personally cannot blame them for wanting masive reparations!
@DorsetRod The Saarland was a "legitimate" occupation for the French? Well, from the French point of view maybe.
Too bad that the Saarländers kicked your French and British arses in 1935, when under the lead of a "bad dictator" the Saarlanders voted 90 percent RETURN to Germany. Ever seen the newsreels, of 1 Million Saarlanders being crazy with joy when freed from alien yoke? Probably not.
Its funny that the British and Yankees did not allow democratic votes for millions, but Hitler did.
@DorsetRod And likewise, just like you enslaved millions of Germans in the Saarland under alien rule, you opened fire on unarmed people in the Sudetenland. These people never agreed to be under Czech rule, they were Germans and wanted to remain what they are.
Do you want to see your beloved Dorset under foreign occupation? I dont think you would.
Bu you seem to have no problem with invasions, murder and injustice, just as long as it is not into your own country.
"Yes, blame all of the Versailles Treaty conditions, ratified by many nations, as a totally British scam".
You are right. We should blame those "bad Germans" and Nazis for Versailles.
Only, your "bad Germans" never took part in Versailles. They were not even allowed to decide over their own fate. And the Nazis did not even exist yet, you fool.
But the Nazis are not important. The British never started war on Germany to "fight the nazis", but to kill as many people as possible.
@DorsetRod Rod, the Versailles "treaty" was not a treaty. If you were the same "failed academic" as you call me, you would know at least, that a treaty is only valid when signed.
And according to British law and to international law, a signature is what? I will tell you: a signature means "consent".
My country never agreed to Versailles, President Ebert signed this paper of shame under protest.
When you protest, it's not consent. According to British law, this "treaty" is null and void.
@Elberiver11 My country never agreed to Versailles, President Ebert signed this paper of shame under protest.
Bollocks! He signed, therefore he agreed. If he had had any balls himself and thought it was wrong and illegal he would have demurred and not signed. Are you saying that because he signed, he was not a man of honour signing on behalf of the German people? I find that his signature made it a legal document under international law as it stood in 1919, whatever you think about it now.
@DorsetRod The French had suffered ? What about the millions of German civilians who had to eat Kohlrüben (hog food), due to your wicked Britsh starvation blockade?
Nice of you to tell us that its justified to demand reparations for suffering. Because in that case, your wicked British Empire should have payed Billions.
The starvation blockade, imposed by British criminals, killed over 750 000 innocent civilians in Germany, mainly children and elderly. The hog food was only for the lucky.
The Germans tend to belittle their sufferings, and call this desaster 1917 as "kohlrübenwinter", winter of turnip roots. But hundreds of thousands, who were not lucky enough to get some hog food, were starved to death by the British.
This mean-minded and most infamous British attempt to starve Germany to death, caused food-riots in countless cities. But i guess all those children and elderly people who miserably starved to death do not count for you , Rod? Because they were "only" Germans.
@DorsetRod The Versailles dictate was "ratifiied" by many nations? So who has given Nicaragua or Venezuela the right to decide of the fate of 3.5 Million Sudetengermans, and with what right do they forbid millions of Germans to vote in Democratic Elections?
If i steal your house, Rod, your car, your money, your family, whatever - and then i "ratify" it by people you never met. Would you accept this "raticifation"? I dont think you would.
@DorsetRod wrote: "it had fuck all to do with the British government.".
The British Empire was leading world power Nr. 1 at that time, and created the Versailles enslavement-plan together with France and the USA. So the British had "fuck all" to do with Versailles? They created it, mate.
And if you say that the French intruders had the right to occupy the Saarland, then you prove that you have no knowledge about my country at all.
@DorsetRod In any case, the Versailles "Treaty" is not a treaty but null and void, according to your own British law. Any judge in Britain would send you to jail if you extort someone to sign a paper by forcing him by putting a gun to his head.
But when the British and the French can extort trillions, then all of the sudden their own law does not count. That's British spirit. And today they try to cover up their own murderous and treacherous history, and lay the blame on my country.
@Elberiver11 To the victor go the spoils. Germany lost, so shut the fuck up and accept the consequences is what I say and most in this channel will agree with, dumbhead. Loss of Kaiser Bill and your hated Prussian Emperor, loss of a piddling little 'Empire', loss of billions of Marks in reparations, loss of territory in Europe, severe reduction in armaments/forces and a severe ego problem having been a world leader now reviled as the people who started the World War. All legally done, mate!
@DorsetRod While our great King Wilhelm II , King of Prussia and German Emperor ruled our country in peace the wicked British started war after war.
When the peacefull Boer settlers found gold in South Africa, the British started war again , out of typical British GREED and British mean-mindedness.
When Lord Kitchener realized he was too weak to defeat the Boers, although he had more men, he took all Boer children and women hostage and put them into concentration camps.
@DorsetRod Lord Kitchener put over 100 000 innoent children and women in British concentration camps, where he brutally murdered over 40 000 of them. CHILDREN and women! That's disgusting. The British army of cowards did not succeed in the fight man-to-man, so they carried the war into the children's and mother's homes. That's pathetic, Rod.
And you are critizing our great German monarch who ran our country at the very same time, while YOU commited this monstrous crime? How dare you.
@DorsetRod Well, you can not eat the cake and have it, Rod. You must make up your mind. You can either claim you were "humane" , or enslave a nation and install anti-democratic rule like you did in Versailles-St. Germain 1919. You chose the latter, so its you who "shut the F*** up", Roddy.
Your British criminal nation is the one who started WW II, and yes, the war did not start in 1939, because you triggered countless invasions not from, but into Germany already in 1919. Learn history, mate.
@Elberiver11 No, your German war criminal nation is the one who started both World War 1 and World War 11 so YOU must 'shut the fuck up', Elberiver11. Both the Kaiser and Hitler had the ability to stop those wars if they had earnestly desired. It is to Germany's eternal shame that they did not. I repeat, 'to the victor goes the spoils' - you lost, you pay the consequences. Just like Britain lost the American colonies, so you Krauts lost two world wars and were equally humiliated. Get over it!
@DorsetRod hahaha, our anti-german hater again, you really do hate us, dont you!
Too bad, my dear, that the truth has leaked out, about your wicked Empire. What do you want to about it?
The British Empire started both world wars on Germany, not the other way round. Just lie about it all you want, mate!
And the ugly fat pig who is the main culprit is called Mister Churchill. He is guilty of turning a European war into WW II with the LUSITANIA False-flag, and he is guilty of WW II, too.
@DorsetRod So tell me, you stupid island-monkey: How many wars has this "bad " Hitler declared on your beloved island?
NONE, du kleiner Englischer Furz. lol
Lern Geschichte, du dummkopf. Ihr Engländer seid eine Schande für Europa! Und Lern mal Deutsch, ist die meist-gesprochene Sprache ein Europa! JAWOHL, noch vor Eurem pseudo-französische Namens ENGLISCH.
@DorsetRod everybody knows that it was the British and American criminals who have created the border-conflict with Poland. So according to our friend RODDY from the British island of lies, it was the Germans guilty of the Versaille dictate, right? You moron, the Germans were not even allowed to take part in the Anglo-American enslavement plan for millions.
If Germany had had her way, the British Empire would still exist, not a single British person would have died in the war.
@DorsetRod But you fools chose to start a war. Yes, YOU did, you gangsters. And as for your wicked lies and slander about our great monarch Wilhelm II: You probably do not know that he happened to be Grandson of Queen Victoria.
Due to his family ties, he never intented to wage war on England. It is an undisputed historic fact, that neither King Wilhelm II of Prussia, grandson of Queen Victoria, nor Hitler wanted war with England. You must be utterly stupid, if you claim the opposite.
@Elberiver11 It is obvious to all but the most doltish people on this planet i.e. you and your army of pro-German nazi sympathisers that Germany started both World Wars. You certainly had no problem in going to war as soon as you had an excuse to in order to gain more territory and compete with the British Empire. Of course I know that Kaiser Bill was the grandson of Queen Victoria! Fool. I also know that she though he was an arrogant little shit who should be slapped down, hard.
@DorsetRod Hi Rod. I am just listening to a great speech of your great Monarch Wilhelm II., who was an Emperor of peace, not of Racism like your British royals who murdered millions. It is interesting to hear the other side of the story, isn't it? I wonder why your country has not the guts to publish such speeches and teach it to English kids. All that British kids are taught is: Germans are evil, Britons are saints. LOL . Are you not ashamed of your country to spread such fraud?
@DorsetRod It was the British who deliberately dismantled our great monarchy in 1919 (by keeping their own, of course. Preaching water, but drinking wine - praising "democracy", while practising monarchy,that's British).
The aim was to destabilize the country and lead us into desaster. It was the Versailles "treaty" (in truth extorted, thus a dictate) that caused hyperinflation, starvation, mass-poverty, tyranny and enslavement for millions. British guilt.
The British not only drew up borders of injustice for millions of civilians (like cutting off the German city of Danzig and placing it under control of a hostile enemy). They also created economic decline (e.g. Danzig was not able to survive as a "free state" because it was too small, e.g. East prussia was cut off from Germany by the British "democracy-"bringers, while their nice Polish friends blocked all trade between Eastprussia and the Reich, thus leading to economic decline in Eastprussia).
That Republican PIECES OF SHIT would favorite this is laughable. Billionaire protecting, corporation worshipping asshole Republicans have NOTHING in common with Churchill
What went through my head was NO FUCKING SHIT. That's what all the greatest nations did and lived to prosper. Unfortunately the British empire crumbled through finical crisis.
Winston Churchill is my second Hero, only my father retains the title of My First Hero and he did fight in this war and he came home alive and well and went on to have me.
IF CHURCHILL DIDNT COME INTO POWER BRITAIN WOULD HAVE ACCEPTED HITLERS OFFER OF PEACE! Then what hope would the world have? Hitler would have turned Europe and West-Rusia into a war factory! Then the USA would have been humilated BY JAPAN,GERMANY,ITALY They would stand no chance of invading Europe THE AXIS WOULD HAVE BROUGHT THE FRONTLINE TO AMERICA! Who would have seeked peace GERMANY HAD THE BEST ARMY IN THE WORLD1938-41 They lost because of numbers an manufacturing! AND TAKING ON GREAT POWERS
@XIPsquaredIX : Churchill quoted "never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy." What does it mean? I'm confused. English is not my first language. So I don't understand this speech.
and it was stupid to think that Germans would remainded with their heads down after so unfair peace agreement...so western allies were to blame because ther enforced unfair reparations upon Germany and then when this caused perilous respond in form of Nazis they simply went along...if there was more common sense I think that both ww could have been stopped...but this is history...this catastrophy brought peace on Continet torn apart by wars...
there is a interesting book by Pat Buchanan Unnecesary war in which he explaines that Germany was forced into ww1 by warmongers in british government and by revanchist France and Russia...Germany was satisfied power after reunification and did not wage any war but was threatened by powerful alliance surrounding her so was forced in preemtipe strike...this could easily be prevented if UK remainded neutral...Fra and Russ would never start a war alone.
@cheifbrownface how the hell can you say that Churchill made England a really sucessful country in ww2 and that speech told everyone not to quit Britain is awsome
Without Churchill and the Western Allies, Switzerland would no longer exist! We acknowledge this in thankfulness!
Hitler wanted to invade Switzerland. We had been totally encircled. There was the nazi plan "Operation Tannenberg." to invade Switzerland. A Swiss traitor, Jakob Schaffner, should have been the governor of Switzerland. Fortunately for him, he was killed in an Allied bomb raid in Strasbourg, 1944. Otherwise he would have been hanged in Switzerland for high treason!
@ Scottfrom “Churchill began bombing CITIES. He was a terrorist. “
The RAF is now known to have been nearly beaten (running out of aircraft and experienced pilots) and only the diversion of the Luftwaffe by an angry Hitler in retaliation of the Berlin bombing allowed them to regroup.
Germany then ground its huge military forces around to fight on the Eastern front leaving England for later.
Calling Sir Winston Churchill a terrorist is just daft and only makes you look silly.
@ Scottfrom “Churchill began bombing CITIES. He was a terrorist. “
It did lead to the dreadful bombing of Dresden and ended the philosophy of ‘Carpet Bombing’ as a moral use of arms by the RAF. America had joined us, and surgical strikes of strategic targets resumed with much success.
British armed forces (including my Father!) where fighting to prevent the German military machine from taking England by force, it was at that time very much a possibility.
@ Scottfrom “Churchill began bombing CITIES. He was a terrorist. “
It is said that a little knowledge is dangerous. Beware!
I suggest you find out about how the events during WWII (Battle of Britain) played out, that led to the 'tit-for-tat' bombing of German and United Kingdom non strategic targets. I understand that an unfortunate miss hit by a Luftwaffe squadron due to heavy fog, led to the bombing of the London docks and a retaliatory bombing of Berlin by the RAF.
@ScottfromTexas@djankobear Actually the first bombing of Berlin was accidental by a bomber off-course searching for his military target. It was Hitler's retaliation bombing London which started the tit-for-tat civilan bombing. @ScottfromTexas I would be careful making sweeping statements like that; just shows how little you know.
@rubiconuk1981 No it is you talking pig-shit,read further,it is a fact Hitler refused to bomb english towns/cities,even when the english were bombing German cities,this is fact,which is even admitted by the British Broadcasting Company.
What is more nothing to Berlin was of accident,it is vile and ignorant to suggest this.
@TheBonn27 No, it's you being obnoxious. He refused? That's why they had to rebuild parts of London, Liverpool, all of Coventry. I had family who died in those blitzes.
@rubiconuk1981 No,i am right,you do not believe then check your own BBC.Germany did not want to bomb England,is fact not opinion.
"Disrespectful pig"not all my relations made it out from the evil allied attacks.Bristol,Liverpool,London,ect..minimal,check out Berlin,Hamberg,Dresden..ect,not to be compared.
@rubiconuk1981 There is no proof of this,yes,for one good reason,Germany had no intention to head west,this is fact and i know more than plenty,this is undeniable.
The French and english declared war,ect..ect..we all know this.What is unclear to you is the fact,Germany wanted only former in-border lands and the abuses of Germans within neighbouring borders to halt.What is more Germany knew of the Russian threat and had to take action.To wait for the Russian assault would be suicide,fact.
@rubiconuk1981 You have no case to rest,absurd?? Hitler himself wrote of his future proposals,this being a war involving Greater Germany and the British Empire against the U.S.This he estimated to take place 30 to 40 years from the start of wwII.
If this is the case,which is written,then for sure no attention of Germany heading west,stupid propaganda and nothing more.
This has been flagged as spam show
Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.
ronstar80 4 days ago
Comment removed
ronstar80 4 days ago in playlist Favorite videos
This has been flagged as spam show
CHURCHILL IS AN EVIL FUCKING CUNT & WAR CRIMINAL THAT ORDERED THE BOMBING & GENOCIDE OF OVER 500,000 German Children, Women, Men, Elderly & even all the animals in DRESDEN!
whitechristian1066 1 month ago
If you're going through hell, keep going
Ultima770 1 month ago
i wish he was still alive to see the country now...nothing to be proud of anymore. the honour is gone
shinobi247 1 month ago
This speech made me a lifetime fan of Churchill!
KordastiLangIns 1 month ago
his speech means nothing he was drunkard and a lying jew. England should of joined Germany.
look at england tday the anglo saxon race is almost extinct.
natezeppo 3 months ago
@natezeppo well some1 is a bad loser
ephillips2008 2 months ago
@ephillips2008 how am i a bad loser?
natezeppo 2 months ago
@natezeppo No-one's perfect, except maybe you, right? FUCK OFF
studas2011 2 months ago
@natezeppo No mate the western allies should have done what the russians did and burnt Germany to ashes and anyway Britain and Germany would not have been able to defeat the USSR.
kinggeorge1800 1 month ago
Where are those great inpirational leaders nowerdays ?
MultiPuzzler 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CHURCHILL is a fucking WAR CRIMINAL for the HOLOCAUST OF BOMBS DROPPED ON DRESDEN & GENOCIDE of 500,000 Aryan Germans! FUCK the Treaty of Versailles & the FUCKING EVIL ZIONIST ANTI-CHRISTS with their FAKE HOLO-HOAX, just an excuse to INVADE PALESTINE! WHITE POWER for the people of Germany!
whitechristian1066 3 months ago
Elberiver is never right. He is a nazi sympathiser with a pathological hatred of Britain, Churchill and all things British. He would not know what truth is if it leaped out and smacked him over the head. Avoid this person, his 'history' lessons are full of flawed reasoning and unfounded assertions.
DorsetRod 3 months ago
What all of us in Europe need to think about, constantly, is how to make sure it never happens again.
harryfaber 3 months ago
@harryfaber ditto that motion
mrmemanme 3 months ago
We all need to learn history, but at school, only 'history' that is favourable to our countries is taught. You need to dig deeper, and look for truth. You are not likely to find it, but you may start to get close and understand that we all have history that is buried because it is so shameful.
I am not convinced that Hitler was the worst wartime leader, Stalin probably killed more that he did, and he was 'on our side'.
harryfaber 3 months ago
Honestly, one could learn more from listening to this man speak ,than one could from any classroom, or any book. He is truly the greatest stateman
to have ever lived, and had inspired me to soldier on in the darkest hours of my life
sarabower1 3 months ago
Excellent!!!!!
backcreekbushcraft 3 months ago
The most powerful 17 seconds of YouTube.
capatronful 4 months ago 26
@capatronful agreed. dont forget to like the video and subscribe if you enjoyed.
XIPsquaredIX 4 months ago
can i use this for my band's new track? :D
JaffaManBaby 4 months ago
@JaffaManBaby sure, just link back to this video so I get credit :)
XIPsquaredIX 4 months ago
I'am tired of hearing people bitch about who saved who or who won what. At the end of the day can't we all just sit down. Have a pint or two AND KILL SOME COMMUNISTS!?
MrCisco95 4 months ago
Trolls all over the damn place
TheBiggamer64 4 months ago
trollin' everywhere.........
mikew781 5 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK (Donated) For Debates And Governance
Topics: THE WEAPON THAT CAN BREAK THE CYCLE OF WAR AND TERRORISM, Debated Issues, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
balancedway1.yolasite.com
balanceddiet.yolasite.com
balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
SPREAD THIS BOOK AND CONQUER THE SPREADING EVIL BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE - FOR FREEDOM AND PEACE.
TheServiceWeb 6 months ago
ELBERIVER11 - Thanks for the history lesson (yawn). Your 'sources' are nothing but a pack of lies from Nazi - friendly historians and right wing journalists. Fact: I DON'T BELIEVE YOU. Fact: YOU are a LIAR. Stop trying to change the facts of recorded history with propaganda.
DorsetRod 6 months ago
@DorsetRod Excuse me? My sources are a pack of lies from the NAZIS? lol
I did not know yet, that the British foreign ministry was ruled by Nazis. But thanks for letting us know.
LMAO
Elberiver11 4 months ago
The ex-Kaiser Wilhem 11 went on to advocate a "regular international all-worlds pogrom à la Russe" as "the best cure" and further believed that Jews were a "nuisance that humanity must get rid of some way or other. I believe the best would be gas!" How very prophetic....perhaps little ex-Corporal Hitler heard about this, too?
DorsetRod 7 months ago
As the "nice" Britain allowed the Polish enemy to block trade and passengers on German soil, Eastprussia had to set-up the "See-Notdienst Ostpreussen" ("Sea-emergency service Eastprussia") to bring the goods via the sea, because Poland blocked trade.
But this was expensive, so Eastprussian goods became to dear and nobody bought them any more. Many German families sank into poverty. This was the deed of the "harmless" Versailles crime. Why does your country not teach any of that., Rod?
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@Elberiver11 Why? Because it is obscure and abstruse history known only to academics like yourself, but in your case it is the academia of a long forgotten and bigoted elite. These days, nobody really cares about these poor German people who were resetlled after the War, they were a side show of history compared to the Communisation of Europe and the march of millions of refugees to new lands...it wasn't only Germans who suffered, you are only stressing one set of unfortunate people. Bigot!
DorsetRod 7 months ago
@DorsetRod This man comes from the country who has been fouling and besmirching our national honour for over 100 years, with all their lies they spread about us, and then he calls me a "bigot"? Well that is quite a bit much, isn't it.
Mister DorsetRod apparantly does not know that his country's "Lampshade"-story, aimed to insult and blacken our name in the world, has long time ago turned out to be a Britsh lie. Like so many other lies.
And yet he even uses this lie himself!
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod This is typical English and American: They spread on their TV and teach in their schools 1000 times a day "the Germans are bad people" and "so many people suffered under the Germans" and likewise.
So how much makes 1000 times 365? After a year only, i reckon the English and Americans have told this nearly half a million times.
Now let's make a change and tell the world not about crimes BY Germans, but those crimes TO Germans, and then they get angry! like Rod does.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
In British schools and TV, where they tell people that Churchill never massmurdered children, never dropped Napalm on innocents and has no guilt for both world wars, the also tell their people 1 Million times per year about "crimes by bad Germans".
Now look at DorsetRod's reaction: When after 1 Million "bad germans" TV shows you tell them about crimes of the other side too - something completely hidden in Britain - then they say "oh you are really one-sided, arent you".
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod Just to let you know, Rod:
Churchill and Stalin killed 3 Million German civilans after the war, but not just "executed" but A) either slowly starved to death B) or tortured to death like put in barrels with nails rolling downhill C) or simply perishing at the edge of the road after e.g. the Brünn death march.
All these atrocities and crimes, dear Rod, to our people, remain deliberately covered-up by your countries USA and Britain.
And these are the nations who have done it.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod I do not agree, Rod, with your whole nation not only lying about these millions of people murdered by Churchill, but even spitting on our graves and fouling the commemoration of these victims.
"tt was not only Germany who suffered", a most peculiar remark considering we see 1 Million times a year the "poor british/Jews". But about what the "poor British" did in Yalta 1945 etc. we do not even see for once.
And then he insinuates i was to "one-sided", and claims his country was not.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod So please do not reproach me for telling the truth about Churchill. Rod. Those who tell truth are not the bigots. Those are the bigots, you prefer to sweep the truth under the carpet, and i am sorry but your whole nation does.
Churchill murdered almost 3 times more children and women together with his friend Dictator Stalin, then died in Auschwitz.
Also notice another British lie: After the war the British claimed, 4 million died there. Today we know, this number was a lie.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@Elberiver11 Churchill murdered almost 3 times more children and women together with his friend Dictator Stalin, then died in Auschwitz.
Also notice another British lie: After the war the British claimed, 4 million died there. Today we know, this number was a lie.
So, where is your proof for these ridiculous claims? Until you give the proof, they remain what they are: allegations, nothing more, nothing less.
DorsetRod 7 months ago
@DorsetRod My proof is for example any encyclopedia, or try the memorial plate at Auschwitz, which says 1.5 Million.
A few years ago, your country had claimed it was 4 Million, and the memorial plate said the same.
So during fog and night, they simply changed this plate. But where are the remaining 2.5 Millions, murdered by the "bad Germans"? Your country kept insulting and fouling our reputation, claimng it was 4 Million. Today we know, its 1.5 Million. How do you explain that?
Elberiver11 6 months ago
@DorsetRod 600 000 - 800 000: murdered in German cities (mostly children and women and elderly, Churchill preferred fighting them over men)
After the war:
2 Million in the Yalta-Genocide
1.7 Million in Anglo-american death camps
Another 1 Million in Soviet camps
If you just count the German civilians and POWs together who were murdered or tortured to death after the war, then you have more than 3 times this number.
Why dont you read some books? You dont need me for this, do you?
Elberiver11 6 months ago
@DorsetRod Try Prof. Dr. Alfred de Zayas, an American professor for international law, who was member of the UN-Commission for human rights. So, i dont think its a bad source. Certainly a better source than these weird TV-shows you saw about "germans made lampshades". lol
Professor de Zayas wrote a lot about the Genocide that took place after the war. Also the Bundesarchiv would be good, but as you dont speak German it won't help you a lot.
Try de Zayas, if you really want to know.
Elberiver11 6 months ago
@DorsetRod Another good source would be British historian Giles MacDonough. He is a regular contributor for The TIMES and many other British media.
As you see , i only use sources from your countries, from America and Britain. (which are not my countries, no matter what you keep believing). I would never use a German source, because you would slander anything coming from our country as "nazi"-source, wouldn't you.
So i hope a journalist for The London TIMES is not a Nazi-source for you, Rod!
Elberiver11 6 months ago
@DorsetRod If you type in Google: How 3 million Germans died after VE day,
then you get an article in the British Telegraph about Giles MacDonough and his books.
By the way, i dont care if you keep denying what i say. I know that i speak the truth, and if you do not like the truth, fair enough.
Notice: I do not hate the British or the Americans, i simply do not accept their lies, and their constant attemtps to foul and slander my nation. I have the same right to love my nation like you do.
Elberiver11 6 months ago
@Elberiver11 You're a pathological LIAR. NO Germans were exterminated in concentration camps after World War 11 by Britain or America and Churchill had NOTHING TO DO WITh the Lusitania incident. You sicken me with your appallingly TWISTED view of history. You will do anything to support your insane theories and most of the authors you cite are discredited holocaust-denying Nazi sympathisers, so WHY should anyone believe you? Cretin, liar and apologist for Nazi war crimes...ANALRIVER11. .
DorsetRod 5 months ago
@DorsetRod Churchill had nothing to do with the LUSITANIA fraud?
It's appalling how little you Britishers and Americans know about your own history. Winston Churchill was 1st Lord of the Admirality, which means nothing more and nothing less than Commander of the British fleet, my dear.
He was the one who sent the LUSITANIA, a battle ship disguised as "civilian"" ship, into the war zone, knowing the Germans would sink it and thus create outrage in the USA.
Learn history, mate.
Elberiver11 4 months ago
@DorsetRod So what's "twisted" about revealing the FACTS, Fact which you and your countries (America and England) aim to cover with a great dark cloak? Are you denying that Winston Churchill was 1st Commander of the British Fleet and 1) mobilized the British fleet before the "bad" Germans did it, 2) tried to drag America into war because Britain was depleted and 3) thus sent the LUSITANIA into the war zone?
If you deny all that, my dear Rod, then it is you is the denier - not me.
Elberiver11 4 months ago
@DorsetRod The BBC British Broadcasting Corporation brought a whole documentary series about the LUSITANIA deception, already years ago. All of Britain knows it, that the LUSITANIA was Churchill's attempt to create war between America and Europe. All of Britain, except you.
And according to you, the BBC is one of my "nazi"-sources, right?
Man, you should stop insulting all Germans as Nazis. It's pathetic.
I dont call you Americans and Britishs "slave trading racists", do i?
Elberiver11 4 months ago
@DorsetRod YES , Germans were exterminated in death camps, and i can even tell you where they were: near the town of Sinzig on the Rheinwiesen (Rhine Meadows), under the Command of your American massmurderer Eisenhower.
I should know, because my own Grandfather was murdered by you in one of those camps, and this was long time after the war was over! It was a French camp, and the French, the Americans, the Poles, the Czechs and Russians ALL had concentration camps .
AFTER 1945.
Elberiver11 4 months ago
@DorsetRod the fact that my Grandfather (who had done nothing wrong, except fighting your fine French friends who started war on US, not we on them) was married to a Jewish wife, did not disturb the "good" Allies. She was arrested too, because they were on French territory.
Proof that your wicked countries USA, Britain and France never started war on us to "save the Jews", as you claim. In fact, you Americans and Britishers closed the doors for Jewish immigrants in 1938.
Elberiver11 4 months ago
@DorsetRod Nazi war crimes? How can i "apologize" for them, when i dont even talk about them, you moron?
Nobody denies Nazi crimes, at least not my country. Germany does not deny anything, you sick racist man. But YOU and your country deny YOUR warcrimes. Your wicked pig Harris deliberately killed 1 million children and women alive, together with your fine Yankee friends.
But of course, this is not a warcrime, is it. According to Mr. Rod, we DESERVED IT.
Elberiver11 4 months ago
@DorsetRod You should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself, you American and Britishs.
And remember: According to your own words, the BBC and the British foreign ministry is a "twisted nazi" - source. What a lunatic you are, Rod.
Elberiver11 4 months ago
@Elberiver11 dude, the nazis invaded poland, and Austria and ceschslovakia. The uk where allies with Poland so had to defend them, war ensued, so the fault of the war is with Germany and is therefore the fault of the nazis.
mrmemanme 4 months ago
@mrmemanme Not quite that simple, the seeds of WW2 were sown at Versailles, and in the Washington treaty. Nothing is as simple as 'x attacked y so the war started'.
The naval blockade of Germany throughout 1919 set up a lot of the problems, as did the French demands for reparations.
We were all conned by the political classes of each nation.
harryfaber 3 months ago
@harryfaber yeah i know, but look up Gustav stessmen, he was a German Chancellor of the Weimar republic, he solved hyperinflation, lowered the reperarions and made everybody trust Germany again, i feel sure that if he had not died and the depression had not occued then ww2 as we know it would have been avoided.
mrmemanme 3 months ago
@mrmemanme Sadly, history is littered with 'what might have been', WW2 'as we know it' would not have happened if the British & French had shown some opposition to the re-militarization of the Rhineland, Czechoslovakia, the Anschluss and so on. However, what we will never know is what would have happened if, for example, German scientists had more time to prepare, or had taken a strategic instead of tactical view of the likely requirement for weapons to fight 'the war'.
harryfaber 3 months ago
@DorsetRod You cannot deny that we sent the Cossacks back to the Soviets knowing that their future was 'not secure'. You may also want to look at how we treated known Nazi criminals. The ones who were useful to us were quickly forgiven and put to work for us, the ones we didn't like were executed.
We have much to be ashamed of, but 'history is written by the victor'.
harryfaber 3 months ago
@harryfaber I think you should state what your sources are for the claim that 'we' sent 'Cossacks' back to the Soviet Union. Also which Nazi war criminals 'we' forgave and put to work for 'us'. If you are referring to the way in which the US government made sure that Werner Von Braun and several other V2 rocket scientists were whisked off to the USA and put to work on the missile programme and the NASA space programme, before NATO was formed in 1949, that is not working for Britain, is it?
DorsetRod 3 months ago
@DorsetRod Anthony Eden. Many 'German' soldiers were found to be Russian, Ukrainian and so on, we returned those that Stalin demanded.
It was not just the rocket programme, there were lesser Gauleiters and industrialists who were whipped through the processes a bit 'smartly', and put back to their former work. The directors of AG Farben spring to mind, as does Julius Dorpfmuller. Elberiver is right to point some blame at all countries. Strive for truth, and avoid 'headlines'.
harryfaber 3 months ago
@DorsetRod also google "Eisenhower's death camps". Your American friends had real extermination camps in Germany, along the Rheinwiesen (Rhine meadows). Eisenhower later on became president of the US.
It seems to me, having a criminal record for being a million-fold massmurderer, you have best chances to become American president! lol
Elberiver11 6 months ago
@DorsetRod you have enough sources now, i doubt that you are really interested, so i wonder why i should go out of my way when i believe that you are not really interested anyway.
In case you are, there are lots of good sources. Also try Professor Higgs, who wrote about the Americans lying about Pearl Harbour.
And Churchill lying about the LUSITANIA, sending a British ship packed with children and women deliberately into the warzone in 1915, was even on the BBC a few years ago.
Elberiver11 6 months ago
Comment removed
DorsetRod 6 months ago
@Elberiver11 We also do not teach much about the naval blockade of Germany throughout 1919, and the starvation it caused during the influenza crisis. I rather think that all countries only teach those parts of history that are 'glorious' and not some of the less savoury parts of the story. The way that the victorious powers treated Austria nd Germany set up many of the greivances that fueled the desire for the 2nd WW.
It is very 'cosy' to blame just the Germans, but wrong.
harryfaber 3 months ago
This is only a fraction of what the British-American Versailles enslavement plan did to millions of families. And you people dare insult our mass-graves, murdered by this warcriminal Winston Churchill who threw screaming children into the Firestorm alive.
I am glad i am German and NOT British or Yank , because we have , unlike you people, noting to reproach ourselves for. We never attacked America or Britain, both nations started war on US, not the other way round, as you falsely claim.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
know what kind of things are taught in Britain and USA, Rod: Germans are bad people and the British are god's chosen people with a clean slate.Good grief! To think i used to believe that nonsens, because guess what, mate: German schools teach the same garbage, as we are an occupied country. But if you bother read scientific books, you will find that Britain and America wrote a history of fraud and cover-up.
Both world wars are British and American guilt - not ours. Lie about it all you want.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
If you had any clue about how the British Empire deliberately created hate, murder, civil war, refugees and invasions between Germany and her neighbours especially on her eastern border, then it's for the blind to see that these borders were meant to create war - desired and carried out by the British Empire and her nice American friends in Versailles and St. Germain 1919.
But of course the British have no clue about what they did. They are too busy to lay their blame on someone else.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod Our great Monarch Wilhelm II, fouled, besmirched and betrayed by our "nice" British friends, was a King of Peace. Before the British started war on him in 1914, he did not fight a single war.
But the British, at the same time, fought countless wars, tried to make China drug-addicts in the OPIUM-war, they murdered millions in India and started war on the Boers in 1899 - 1902, set up British concentatrion camps and more. Britain: A true belligerent Empire of wickedness and murder.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod so if our Emperor was known to be peaceful, while your evil British Empire was known to be a most belligerent villain - how much credibility do you think have the accusations if they come from a British of all people? LOL Not very much, my friend. The British Empire killed more innocents in British-India only, than Adolph Hitler ever killed Jews. That is quite an achievement. And yet, nobody knows Lord Lytton. Why? Because the British are a false and dishonest people.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
On 2 Dec 1919, following his abdication, the Kaiser wrote to Field Marshal von Mackensen, denouncing his abdication as the "deepest, most disgusting shame ever perpetrated by a person in history, the Germans have done to themselves", "egged on and misled by the tribe of Judah ... Let no German ever forget this, nor rest until these parasites have been destroyed and exterminated from German soil" .
DorsetRod 7 months ago
Churchill is the main culprit of WW II.
While a Polish-German war was going on, Britain used this pretext to subjugate Germany and wipe her economic rival off the map. Germany, who did not want war with England, made countless peace offers to England, but Churchill refused - Churchill wanted war.
He ignored all German offers and dragged the USA into war, thus turning a war between Germany and only one neighbour into world war.
Churchill is a criminal and should have been hanged.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
Germany never wanted war with Britain as Hitler was very fond of the English.
After all,
We are ALL Germanic - England = AngleLand
jehovahhasheard 7 months ago
British politicians had caused starvation and masspoverty in Germany since 1919, they placed over 5 Million Germans under the Tyranny of Aliens.
2.1 Million were placed under Polish yoke and 3.5 under Czech rule. It was the British who caused this mess in 1919 with their Versailles dictate, they forbade democracy in Danzig, Saarland, Sudeteland and others, note the Saarland was occupied by Britain's filthy french friends.
The British forbade democratic elections and called it "democracy".
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@Elberiver11 Lies, all lies from a master propagandist whose grandfather was a high ranking offical in the Nazi party and escaped a war crimes tribunal by the skin of his teeth. Yes, blame all of the Versailles Treaty conditions, ratified by many nations, as a totally British scam. Saarland was a legitimate occupation for the French, it had fuck all to do with the British government. The French had suffered horrendously in WW1, I personally cannot blame them for wanting masive reparations!
DorsetRod 7 months ago
@DorsetRod The Saarland was a "legitimate" occupation for the French? Well, from the French point of view maybe.
Too bad that the Saarländers kicked your French and British arses in 1935, when under the lead of a "bad dictator" the Saarlanders voted 90 percent RETURN to Germany. Ever seen the newsreels, of 1 Million Saarlanders being crazy with joy when freed from alien yoke? Probably not.
Its funny that the British and Yankees did not allow democratic votes for millions, but Hitler did.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod And likewise, just like you enslaved millions of Germans in the Saarland under alien rule, you opened fire on unarmed people in the Sudetenland. These people never agreed to be under Czech rule, they were Germans and wanted to remain what they are.
Do you want to see your beloved Dorset under foreign occupation? I dont think you would.
Bu you seem to have no problem with invasions, murder and injustice, just as long as it is not into your own country.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod
"Yes, blame all of the Versailles Treaty conditions, ratified by many nations, as a totally British scam".
You are right. We should blame those "bad Germans" and Nazis for Versailles.
Only, your "bad Germans" never took part in Versailles. They were not even allowed to decide over their own fate. And the Nazis did not even exist yet, you fool.
But the Nazis are not important. The British never started war on Germany to "fight the nazis", but to kill as many people as possible.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod Rod, the Versailles "treaty" was not a treaty. If you were the same "failed academic" as you call me, you would know at least, that a treaty is only valid when signed.
And according to British law and to international law, a signature is what? I will tell you: a signature means "consent".
My country never agreed to Versailles, President Ebert signed this paper of shame under protest.
When you protest, it's not consent. According to British law, this "treaty" is null and void.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@Elberiver11 My country never agreed to Versailles, President Ebert signed this paper of shame under protest.
Bollocks! He signed, therefore he agreed. If he had had any balls himself and thought it was wrong and illegal he would have demurred and not signed. Are you saying that because he signed, he was not a man of honour signing on behalf of the German people? I find that his signature made it a legal document under international law as it stood in 1919, whatever you think about it now.
DorsetRod 7 months ago
@DorsetRod The French had suffered ? What about the millions of German civilians who had to eat Kohlrüben (hog food), due to your wicked Britsh starvation blockade?
Nice of you to tell us that its justified to demand reparations for suffering. Because in that case, your wicked British Empire should have payed Billions.
The starvation blockade, imposed by British criminals, killed over 750 000 innocent civilians in Germany, mainly children and elderly. The hog food was only for the lucky.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
The Germans tend to belittle their sufferings, and call this desaster 1917 as "kohlrübenwinter", winter of turnip roots. But hundreds of thousands, who were not lucky enough to get some hog food, were starved to death by the British.
This mean-minded and most infamous British attempt to starve Germany to death, caused food-riots in countless cities. But i guess all those children and elderly people who miserably starved to death do not count for you , Rod? Because they were "only" Germans.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod The Versailles dictate was "ratifiied" by many nations? So who has given Nicaragua or Venezuela the right to decide of the fate of 3.5 Million Sudetengermans, and with what right do they forbid millions of Germans to vote in Democratic Elections?
If i steal your house, Rod, your car, your money, your family, whatever - and then i "ratify" it by people you never met. Would you accept this "raticifation"? I dont think you would.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod wrote: "it had fuck all to do with the British government.".
The British Empire was leading world power Nr. 1 at that time, and created the Versailles enslavement-plan together with France and the USA. So the British had "fuck all" to do with Versailles? They created it, mate.
And if you say that the French intruders had the right to occupy the Saarland, then you prove that you have no knowledge about my country at all.
The Saarland is as much "french" as Dorset is.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod In any case, the Versailles "Treaty" is not a treaty but null and void, according to your own British law. Any judge in Britain would send you to jail if you extort someone to sign a paper by forcing him by putting a gun to his head.
But when the British and the French can extort trillions, then all of the sudden their own law does not count. That's British spirit. And today they try to cover up their own murderous and treacherous history, and lay the blame on my country.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@Elberiver11 To the victor go the spoils. Germany lost, so shut the fuck up and accept the consequences is what I say and most in this channel will agree with, dumbhead. Loss of Kaiser Bill and your hated Prussian Emperor, loss of a piddling little 'Empire', loss of billions of Marks in reparations, loss of territory in Europe, severe reduction in armaments/forces and a severe ego problem having been a world leader now reviled as the people who started the World War. All legally done, mate!
DorsetRod 7 months ago
@DorsetRod Our Emperor was very popular, and he was an Emperor of peace. During his longer than 30-year regency he never started a single war.
Have a look at the British Empire in the meantime......LOL
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod While our great King Wilhelm II , King of Prussia and German Emperor ruled our country in peace the wicked British started war after war.
When the peacefull Boer settlers found gold in South Africa, the British started war again , out of typical British GREED and British mean-mindedness.
When Lord Kitchener realized he was too weak to defeat the Boers, although he had more men, he took all Boer children and women hostage and put them into concentration camps.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod Lord Kitchener put over 100 000 innoent children and women in British concentration camps, where he brutally murdered over 40 000 of them. CHILDREN and women! That's disgusting. The British army of cowards did not succeed in the fight man-to-man, so they carried the war into the children's and mother's homes. That's pathetic, Rod.
And you are critizing our great German monarch who ran our country at the very same time, while YOU commited this monstrous crime? How dare you.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod Well, you can not eat the cake and have it, Rod. You must make up your mind. You can either claim you were "humane" , or enslave a nation and install anti-democratic rule like you did in Versailles-St. Germain 1919. You chose the latter, so its you who "shut the F*** up", Roddy.
Your British criminal nation is the one who started WW II, and yes, the war did not start in 1939, because you triggered countless invasions not from, but into Germany already in 1919. Learn history, mate.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@Elberiver11 No, your German war criminal nation is the one who started both World War 1 and World War 11 so YOU must 'shut the fuck up', Elberiver11. Both the Kaiser and Hitler had the ability to stop those wars if they had earnestly desired. It is to Germany's eternal shame that they did not. I repeat, 'to the victor goes the spoils' - you lost, you pay the consequences. Just like Britain lost the American colonies, so you Krauts lost two world wars and were equally humiliated. Get over it!
DorsetRod 7 months ago
@DorsetRod hahaha, our anti-german hater again, you really do hate us, dont you!
Too bad, my dear, that the truth has leaked out, about your wicked Empire. What do you want to about it?
The British Empire started both world wars on Germany, not the other way round. Just lie about it all you want, mate!
And the ugly fat pig who is the main culprit is called Mister Churchill. He is guilty of turning a European war into WW II with the LUSITANIA False-flag, and he is guilty of WW II, too.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod So tell me, you stupid island-monkey: How many wars has this "bad " Hitler declared on your beloved island?
NONE, du kleiner Englischer Furz. lol
Lern Geschichte, du dummkopf. Ihr Engländer seid eine Schande für Europa! Und Lern mal Deutsch, ist die meist-gesprochene Sprache ein Europa! JAWOHL, noch vor Eurem pseudo-französische Namens ENGLISCH.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod everybody knows that it was the British and American criminals who have created the border-conflict with Poland. So according to our friend RODDY from the British island of lies, it was the Germans guilty of the Versaille dictate, right? You moron, the Germans were not even allowed to take part in the Anglo-American enslavement plan for millions.
If Germany had had her way, the British Empire would still exist, not a single British person would have died in the war.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod But you fools chose to start a war. Yes, YOU did, you gangsters. And as for your wicked lies and slander about our great monarch Wilhelm II: You probably do not know that he happened to be Grandson of Queen Victoria.
Due to his family ties, he never intented to wage war on England. It is an undisputed historic fact, that neither King Wilhelm II of Prussia, grandson of Queen Victoria, nor Hitler wanted war with England. You must be utterly stupid, if you claim the opposite.
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@Elberiver11 It is obvious to all but the most doltish people on this planet i.e. you and your army of pro-German nazi sympathisers that Germany started both World Wars. You certainly had no problem in going to war as soon as you had an excuse to in order to gain more territory and compete with the British Empire. Of course I know that Kaiser Bill was the grandson of Queen Victoria! Fool. I also know that she though he was an arrogant little shit who should be slapped down, hard.
DorsetRod 7 months ago
@DorsetRod Hi Rod. I am just listening to a great speech of your great Monarch Wilhelm II., who was an Emperor of peace, not of Racism like your British royals who murdered millions. It is interesting to hear the other side of the story, isn't it? I wonder why your country has not the guts to publish such speeches and teach it to English kids. All that British kids are taught is: Germans are evil, Britons are saints. LOL . Are you not ashamed of your country to spread such fraud?
Elberiver11 7 months ago
@DorsetRod It was the British who deliberately dismantled our great monarchy in 1919 (by keeping their own, of course. Preaching water, but drinking wine - praising "democracy", while practising monarchy,that's British).
The aim was to destabilize the country and lead us into desaster. It was the Versailles "treaty" (in truth extorted, thus a dictate) that caused hyperinflation, starvation, mass-poverty, tyranny and enslavement for millions. British guilt.
And you dare accuse the Germans?
Elberiver11 7 months ago
The British not only drew up borders of injustice for millions of civilians (like cutting off the German city of Danzig and placing it under control of a hostile enemy). They also created economic decline (e.g. Danzig was not able to survive as a "free state" because it was too small, e.g. East prussia was cut off from Germany by the British "democracy-"bringers, while their nice Polish friends blocked all trade between Eastprussia and the Reich, thus leading to economic decline in Eastprussia).
Elberiver11 7 months ago
That Republican PIECES OF SHIT would favorite this is laughable. Billionaire protecting, corporation worshipping asshole Republicans have NOTHING in common with Churchill
beesleeper 7 months ago
Occasionally you'll see Neo-nazi's shit posting on churchill video's. It must burn to hear his defiant voice rallying a people against their tyrant.
angrydead 9 months ago
Ok which Nazi dislikes this?
sophie9822 10 months ago
@sophie9822 Two nazis. Lets go kill them.
Free28761 9 months ago 4
I love Churchill
Vincenza8907 10 months ago 7
What went through my head was NO FUCKING SHIT. That's what all the greatest nations did and lived to prosper. Unfortunately the British empire crumbled through finical crisis.
PiggyCam1997 11 months ago
great !
c2au5 11 months ago
The message is the same no matter the year - one of the greatest speaches in history and just as appropriate today in a world of change
OnlineSuccessSkills 1 year ago 3
The one guy who disliked this is cowering in his Bunker in Berlin.
Elim777 1 year ago 3
the paralel to ghandi is interesting :)
chockn 1 year ago
@chockn I'm curious now...do you happen to have a reference i could look up?
heartjump22 8 months ago
@heartjump22 reminded me of the ghandi movie with ben kingsley. maybe youd like to watch it.. its a nice movie :)
chockn 8 months ago
One person here is named Adolf.
rottwielerking 1 year ago 6
I love this man. God Bless him.
GeneralYogiBear123 1 year ago
Can I use this video for a class website?
pws118 1 year ago
@pws118 absolutely
XIPsquaredIX 1 year ago
Winston Churchill is my second Hero, only my father retains the title of My First Hero and he did fight in this war and he came home alive and well and went on to have me.
CerisePsyche 1 year ago
1 person gave into the overwhelming might of the enemy
KingVerac 1 year ago
Words to live and die by.
mtthwmurphy 1 year ago
IF CHURCHILL DIDNT COME INTO POWER BRITAIN WOULD HAVE ACCEPTED HITLERS OFFER OF PEACE! Then what hope would the world have? Hitler would have turned Europe and West-Rusia into a war factory! Then the USA would have been humilated BY JAPAN,GERMANY,ITALY They would stand no chance of invading Europe THE AXIS WOULD HAVE BROUGHT THE FRONTLINE TO AMERICA! Who would have seeked peace GERMANY HAD THE BEST ARMY IN THE WORLD1938-41 They lost because of numbers an manufacturing! AND TAKING ON GREAT POWERS
martynrobin121 1 year ago
most powerful 17 seconds on youtube
johndonofrio84x 1 year ago 47
@johndonofrio84x for sure, I never thought this short video for my history project would get so many views!
XIPsquaredIX 1 year ago
@XIPsquaredIX : Churchill quoted "never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy." What does it mean? I'm confused. English is not my first language. So I don't understand this speech.
LaoSoftware 9 months ago
and it was stupid to think that Germans would remainded with their heads down after so unfair peace agreement...so western allies were to blame because ther enforced unfair reparations upon Germany and then when this caused perilous respond in form of Nazis they simply went along...if there was more common sense I think that both ww could have been stopped...but this is history...this catastrophy brought peace on Continet torn apart by wars...
doczg88 1 year ago
Comment removed
doczg88 1 year ago
there is a interesting book by Pat Buchanan Unnecesary war in which he explaines that Germany was forced into ww1 by warmongers in british government and by revanchist France and Russia...Germany was satisfied power after reunification and did not wage any war but was threatened by powerful alliance surrounding her so was forced in preemtipe strike...this could easily be prevented if UK remainded neutral...Fra and Russ would never start a war alone.
doczg88 1 year ago
@cheifbrownface how the hell can you say that Churchill made England a really sucessful country in ww2 and that speech told everyone not to quit Britain is awsome
videomania121 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What a disgusting nutbar this Churchill was. He truly was a maniacal bloodthirsty lunatic
cheifbrownface 1 year ago
@cheifbrownface
Without Churchill and the Western Allies, Switzerland would no longer exist! We acknowledge this in thankfulness!
Hitler wanted to invade Switzerland. We had been totally encircled. There was the nazi plan "Operation Tannenberg." to invade Switzerland. A Swiss traitor, Jakob Schaffner, should have been the governor of Switzerland. Fortunately for him, he was killed in an Allied bomb raid in Strasbourg, 1944. Otherwise he would have been hanged in Switzerland for high treason!
br0at 1 year ago 6
@ Scottfrom “Churchill began bombing CITIES. He was a terrorist. “
The RAF is now known to have been nearly beaten (running out of aircraft and experienced pilots) and only the diversion of the Luftwaffe by an angry Hitler in retaliation of the Berlin bombing allowed them to regroup.
Germany then ground its huge military forces around to fight on the Eastern front leaving England for later.
Calling Sir Winston Churchill a terrorist is just daft and only makes you look silly.
djankobear 1 year ago
@ Scottfrom “Churchill began bombing CITIES. He was a terrorist. “
It did lead to the dreadful bombing of Dresden and ended the philosophy of ‘Carpet Bombing’ as a moral use of arms by the RAF. America had joined us, and surgical strikes of strategic targets resumed with much success.
British armed forces (including my Father!) where fighting to prevent the German military machine from taking England by force, it was at that time very much a possibility.
djankobear 1 year ago
@ Scottfrom “Churchill began bombing CITIES. He was a terrorist. “
It is said that a little knowledge is dangerous. Beware!
I suggest you find out about how the events during WWII (Battle of Britain) played out, that led to the 'tit-for-tat' bombing of German and United Kingdom non strategic targets. I understand that an unfortunate miss hit by a Luftwaffe squadron due to heavy fog, led to the bombing of the London docks and a retaliatory bombing of Berlin by the RAF.
djankobear 1 year ago
a great man.
Ecosse57 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Churchill began bombing CITIES. He was a terrorist.
ScottfromTexas 1 year ago
@ScottfromTexas @djankobear Actually the first bombing of Berlin was accidental by a bomber off-course searching for his military target. It was Hitler's retaliation bombing London which started the tit-for-tat civilan bombing. @ScottfromTexas I would be careful making sweeping statements like that; just shows how little you know.
rubiconuk1981 1 year ago
@rubiconuk1981 No it is you talking pig-shit,read further,it is a fact Hitler refused to bomb english towns/cities,even when the english were bombing German cities,this is fact,which is even admitted by the British Broadcasting Company.
What is more nothing to Berlin was of accident,it is vile and ignorant to suggest this.
TheBonn27 1 year ago
@TheBonn27 No, it's you being obnoxious. He refused? That's why they had to rebuild parts of London, Liverpool, all of Coventry. I had family who died in those blitzes.
You disrespectful pig.
rubiconuk1981 1 year ago 2
@rubiconuk1981 No,i am right,you do not believe then check your own BBC.Germany did not want to bomb England,is fact not opinion.
"Disrespectful pig"not all my relations made it out from the evil allied attacks.Bristol,Liverpool,London,ect..minimal,check out Berlin,Hamberg,Dresden..ect,not to be compared.
TheBonn27 1 year ago
@TheBonn27 I bet you think that Germany did not want to invade Europe either.
...wait... "evil allied attacks" ? ... I rest my case.
rubiconuk1981 1 year ago 3
@rubiconuk1981 There is no proof of this,yes,for one good reason,Germany had no intention to head west,this is fact and i know more than plenty,this is undeniable.
The French and english declared war,ect..ect..we all know this.What is unclear to you is the fact,Germany wanted only former in-border lands and the abuses of Germans within neighbouring borders to halt.What is more Germany knew of the Russian threat and had to take action.To wait for the Russian assault would be suicide,fact.
TheBonn27 1 year ago
@rubiconuk1981 You have no case to rest,absurd?? Hitler himself wrote of his future proposals,this being a war involving Greater Germany and the British Empire against the U.S.This he estimated to take place 30 to 40 years from the start of wwII.
If this is the case,which is written,then for sure no attention of Germany heading west,stupid propaganda and nothing more.
TheBonn27 1 year ago
@TheBonn27 I respect your opinion, even though I disagree with it.
rubiconuk1981 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rubiconuk1981 Thank you for your respect,but it is not opinion and you will know i am right if you care to uncover the real facts.
TheBonn27 1 year ago
@TheBonn27 i dont agree with that either but i know that america would have lost that war defnitly
MRAK47ification 1 year ago
hope, power
Zvukish 1 year ago
1 comment? There isn't too much you can say about this brief quote and WC in general. God bless his soul.
LouisPaquette 1 year ago 27
where did you get the audio from?thanks
torobaro 1 year ago