Polaris Ranger gets stuck on hill climb

[rc88rzrs]

no should have bought a ranger with irs (2005-present)

[TheYamahaarcticcat]

wow pice of shit

[rednecksparadise]

thats a good way to flip it is to go down a hill backwards

[bballplaya123678]

i agree with dant387 in the other video in the description it says rhino still wins but it doesnt in the other video on the same hill the rhino only gets to the first little rut

[dant387]

watch the rhino get stuck on the SAME HILL......the Ranger made it farther

[glacier1978]

he's clearly in 4wd

[bballplaya123678]

so it is a fair compitition because they were both in 2WD and neither made it up the hill but nice try trying to make the rhino sound good using lies the only way it can sound or pretend to be good go polaris

[bballplaya123678]

actually ur wrong floridabowhuner he isn't in 4wd and the polaris ranger does have true 4WD all wheel 100% locked differential and look from 6 seconds to 7 seconds his tires dont move at all when the tires are lifted off the ground and when there is dust iat aboutv 8 seconds that was because he hit the end of the rut and hit his brakes and look at the polaris ranger vs Yamaha rhino comparsin the facts don't lie unlike floridabowhunter... POLARIS RULES!!!!!!!!!!1

[floridabowhunter]

it is in 4wd!

the polaris irs bullshit isnt locked diff's

wich means only 3 tires are transfering power, its gay

nuy a rhino 100% locked differential

[bruticus2]

Wrong. The polaris's front gear case isn't even a differential at all, it is completely locked, like adding a spool locker. The front axles WILL rotate at the same speed when the AWD system actuates the front 'diff'. It is because of this the engineers came up with their flawed (IMO) AWD system.

[bruticus2]

Since the front 'diff' IS completely locked, the steering effort required in AWD would be like driving around a brute or grizz with their front diffs in full lock, pretty tough. To counteract this, polaris uses sensors that monitor the differentiation in speed between the front and rear tires.

[bruticus2]

When the rear tires are spinning 20% faster than the fronts, the AWD system (when enabled, of course) uses electromagnetic actuators to engage/connect the outboard CVs to the hubs (hence polaris's monstrous front end hubs that require lubrication for the moving parts involved in this actuation

[bruticus2]

In most situations this system works quite well, there is no need to stop and select 4wd over 3wd, and it steers like it would in 2WD mode as long as the front drive system remains inert. With my 99 SP500 I noticed that in reverse, especially when backing up an incline, the delay in engagement caused the front tires to have to 'catch up' to the speed of the rears instantaneously, therefore breaking much needed traction.

[clswaringen500]

It is a 2wd ranger or it isn't in AWD. The rear DIff on a ranger is lockable with the flip of a switch. A friend of mine use to have a rhino. Not anymore. He got a ranger

[dirtbikekid12]

dude u should of put it in awd we own a polaris 6x6 proffesional series and it would go almost anywhere if it had a lift kit

[therangerkid]

hey the ranger xp have more ground clearence than a fucking rihno

[love2dune]

He wouldn't have even spun the tires if he got a Yamaha Rhino or Arctic Cat Prowler!

[2007ktm450]

Ranger has had IRS since like 04'. The guy should have put it in AWD.

[ejb812]

No you should have attempted to get out of the ruts? You could easily get through that if you had a driver with his head out of his ass.

[yomonkeyness]

No you should have put it in 4 wheel drive moron

[Als6x6]

Even better go with the Ranger 6x6

[comanche64]

How about using AWD it would have made it up No Prob.

[caffeinefree03]

no you shouldnt have bought a rhino. Its called, steer into or get a lift kit. Those Rangers arent IRS.