Painting gay unions with the word marriage won't make it normal. It will never...ever compare in quality of relationship, intimacy, love or substance to traditional marriages.
Its like putting a very special and expensive pearl on a filthy disgusting pigs snout.
It's really not so surprising for someone in the Bush family to favor same-sex marriage in a state that never supported either of the Presidents Bush in an election. What I'm looking forward to is Barbara speaking out for same-sex marriage in Saudi Arabia.
Not to say I dont think she believes in what she is saying but sometimes I wonder if these other political kids come out and say things so they can get liberal media attention maybe she wants to be seen more in the spot light like Megan MCcain or Reagans son the rebelious one.. the best way to get attention is by saying something you know the libs will want to bring out soon she will also come out with a book like the rest of them.
@dreetos Leave it to an uneducated homophobe to come up with a ridiculous example as an argument against gay marriage. No one is saying "everyone" to mean literally "everyone" you moron. Of course each person has to be of age and sound mind, that should go without saying. Only in your warped world would someone come up with an example like yours. Or a rock, or a pet, or other such stupid examples that I've heard from right-wing fear mongers like you.
@joshfarrow08 if you're going to call me a homophobe you're a goddamn idiot. You think just because someone opposes gay marriage they're automatically a homophobic devil. First off, just because I have conservative values because that was the way I'm raised does NOT mean I am homophobic. I have PLENTY of gay friends, I am in high school where it is very common and they RESPECT my beliefs/agenda, and vice versa. Call me ignorant? Look at yourself; automatically jumping to absurd conclusions.
@dreetos If all you did was "oppose" gay marriage, then no, I wouldn't call you a homophobe. But that's not what you did, you gave a ridiculous example to support your view. No one is calling for the marriage of a "mentally ill pedophile to a 12 year old," as you so eloquently put it. We're talking about two consensual adults of sound mind. Please answer for me, how does it affect YOU in any way if two gay people get married? That irrational fear is what makes you homophobic.
Um NO. I was pointing out how "people should be able to marry the person they love" is a REALLY weak argument, even if it doesn't mean EVERYONE don't use EVERYONE in the sentence if you don't mean it. Again; being judgmental. This is how it effects me? Little molly should NOT have to take home the book "heather has two mommies" if her parents don't wont her to. I read a article of parents facing charges because they did not want their kid reading this..
@dreetos It's only a "weak" argument to you b/c you define marriage differently than other people. Most people have their own definition of what it means, why should YOUR definition trump theirs? Why are you trying to take away a right of one particular type of person just because you don't understand it? This isn't about you understanding a gay lifestyle, no one is asking for that to happen. The rights of people should not differ based on sexual preference, THAT is the issue
@dreetos As for public schools teaching sex ed, I agree with you, it shouldn't be done at all. That should be completely between parents and their children. Marriage equality is a separate issue.
@dreetos So, if you have Gay friends, why shouldn't they have access to the tax breaks you do? Please respond in a way that isn't against gay people, to prove that you are not a homophobe. After all, you have "PLENTY" of gay friends, so you must support people being "Gay". What about a man/woman union deserves tax breaks more than a man/man or woman/woman union?
A Phobia is an irrational fear. Did I freak out and say "OMG HOW COULD SHE SUPPORT THAT" No I did not. It's called an opinion or simply a personal preference. For example I do not like watermelon, that doesn't mean I want it off the shelfs, I just have a preference. You see- You approve of it, I don't simple of that. You have your values, I have mine. Not everyone is going to agree with you so why question it? And sorry it took so long to reply, haven't been on youtube much.
@dreetos *shrug!* You missed what I was saying, apparently, and instead seemed to think I was calling you a homophobe.
Why do your gay friends not deserve the tax breaks you deserve? (Simple. Clean. Not even mentioning marriage here. Just wanting to know why you feel they shouldn't have the tax breaks you have.)
It's not like my motives for being against gay marriage are so they couldn't get tax breaks. The tax breaks on houses is out of my hands, nothing I can do can change that. I personally think honest people who pay taxes regardless of orientations should get tax breaks in my opinion. Not only that it discriminates [or whatever you want to call it] against single/unmarried people too.
@JohnRhysMusician The problem with this is that it would be detrimental to the gene pool as you could inbreed, so as such should not be allowed as this could cause harm to others. But the same could not be said for same sex marriage, no inbreeding, or any breeding for that matter, could occur so would not be detrimental to the human gene pool so would not cause any harm to others.
@maradashewolf Marriage is about children and protecting children. Since same-sex partners cannot have children I don't see the need to alter the definition of marriage to suit their personal desires.
@JohnRhysMusician So to follow your logic, if someone is infertile they should not be allowed to be married. Does that mean fertility tests should be mandatory before getting married?
...that's your opinion, and you're entitled to it. I, however, am a woman married to a man, and neither of us feel any compunction to breed. We are perfectly happy with each other and our cat.
And what of couples that are incapable of producing offspring? Are you saying THEIR marriages are somehow less legitimate, due to their inability to procreate?
You might as well be saying that a woman's only worth lies in the functionality of her uterus.
@maradashewolf I'm just saying that the purpose of marriage is to provide an environment to raise and protect children. That is fact. Marriage has been distorted by many to become a function of personal pleasure. Children need marriage. There was a great editorial in the Boston Herald about marriage. I hope you look for it.
....children don't NEED marriage, any more then adults do. In fact, I have evidence supporting the assertion that many children would be better off with single parents. My mother's father beat his wife and his children viciously on a regular basis. They would have been better off if his wife had not been so mentally crippled by the prevailing societal pressures of the day, and just taken the children and left, so he couldn't beat any of them any more.
And people with brains will realize that maybe, just maybe, she's not her father. Are you yours? C'mon, she didn't choose to be Dubya's child. Cut her some slack. This issue isn't a political one, it's a moral one whether you agree or disagree.
@sanctainquisitio If you STILL don't think we would be better off with Bush in the White House again, where have you been hibernating since Obama got elected?
@asd25471 Actually, i've been here all the time, but Bush will always be hated by everyone forever... the memory of the innocent iraqi's slaughtered is still alive.
There will allways be a leader, and a follower in a relationship. There are no equalities in a marriage, or a relationship. Even jokes in the gay community is; who is the guy and who is the lady..
This has been flagged as spam show
Barbara is a babe! But I don't agree with her.
Painting gay unions with the word marriage won't make it normal. It will never...ever compare in quality of relationship, intimacy, love or substance to traditional marriages.
Its like putting a very special and expensive pearl on a filthy disgusting pigs snout.
Think about it!!!
N2CChaos 8 months ago
Gays have already been able to get married. Your saying its wrong that they're happy and married to eachother? thats pretty messed up if you ask me.
annakf16 1 year ago
It's really not so surprising for someone in the Bush family to favor same-sex marriage in a state that never supported either of the Presidents Bush in an election. What I'm looking forward to is Barbara speaking out for same-sex marriage in Saudi Arabia.
DaveDeShrubber 1 year ago
too late, say it why did not u say it if u were held responsible for it
fobtech 1 year ago
y did y not say when it mattered u cunt
fobtech 1 year ago
Not to say I dont think she believes in what she is saying but sometimes I wonder if these other political kids come out and say things so they can get liberal media attention maybe she wants to be seen more in the spot light like Megan MCcain or Reagans son the rebelious one.. the best way to get attention is by saying something you know the libs will want to bring out soon she will also come out with a book like the rest of them.
aquabluegrl 1 year ago
Damn, she is seriously hot. Holy shit.
WildGunman77 1 year ago 7
She also supports universal healthcare. It seems that the women of the Bush family are the sane ones.
TheFlameoftheWest 1 year ago
@TheFlameoftheWest sadly the men seem to be the ones who run for office
lp4ju 1 year ago
NO. People should NOT get to always marry the person they love. Should a mentally ill pedophile be able to marry a 12 year old? NO. He should not.
dreetos 1 year ago
@dreetos Leave it to an uneducated homophobe to come up with a ridiculous example as an argument against gay marriage. No one is saying "everyone" to mean literally "everyone" you moron. Of course each person has to be of age and sound mind, that should go without saying. Only in your warped world would someone come up with an example like yours. Or a rock, or a pet, or other such stupid examples that I've heard from right-wing fear mongers like you.
joshfarrow08 1 year ago
@joshfarrow08 if you're going to call me a homophobe you're a goddamn idiot. You think just because someone opposes gay marriage they're automatically a homophobic devil. First off, just because I have conservative values because that was the way I'm raised does NOT mean I am homophobic. I have PLENTY of gay friends, I am in high school where it is very common and they RESPECT my beliefs/agenda, and vice versa. Call me ignorant? Look at yourself; automatically jumping to absurd conclusions.
dreetos 1 year ago
@dreetos If all you did was "oppose" gay marriage, then no, I wouldn't call you a homophobe. But that's not what you did, you gave a ridiculous example to support your view. No one is calling for the marriage of a "mentally ill pedophile to a 12 year old," as you so eloquently put it. We're talking about two consensual adults of sound mind. Please answer for me, how does it affect YOU in any way if two gay people get married? That irrational fear is what makes you homophobic.
joshfarrow08 1 year ago
@joshfarrow08
Um NO. I was pointing out how "people should be able to marry the person they love" is a REALLY weak argument, even if it doesn't mean EVERYONE don't use EVERYONE in the sentence if you don't mean it. Again; being judgmental. This is how it effects me? Little molly should NOT have to take home the book "heather has two mommies" if her parents don't wont her to. I read a article of parents facing charges because they did not want their kid reading this..
dreetos 1 year ago
@dreetos It's only a "weak" argument to you b/c you define marriage differently than other people. Most people have their own definition of what it means, why should YOUR definition trump theirs? Why are you trying to take away a right of one particular type of person just because you don't understand it? This isn't about you understanding a gay lifestyle, no one is asking for that to happen. The rights of people should not differ based on sexual preference, THAT is the issue
joshfarrow08 1 year ago
@dreetos As for public schools teaching sex ed, I agree with you, it shouldn't be done at all. That should be completely between parents and their children. Marriage equality is a separate issue.
joshfarrow08 1 year ago
@dreetos So, if you have Gay friends, why shouldn't they have access to the tax breaks you do? Please respond in a way that isn't against gay people, to prove that you are not a homophobe. After all, you have "PLENTY" of gay friends, so you must support people being "Gay". What about a man/woman union deserves tax breaks more than a man/man or woman/woman union?
Damadar 10 months ago
@Damadar
A Phobia is an irrational fear. Did I freak out and say "OMG HOW COULD SHE SUPPORT THAT" No I did not. It's called an opinion or simply a personal preference. For example I do not like watermelon, that doesn't mean I want it off the shelfs, I just have a preference. You see- You approve of it, I don't simple of that. You have your values, I have mine. Not everyone is going to agree with you so why question it? And sorry it took so long to reply, haven't been on youtube much.
dreetos 8 months ago
@dreetos *shrug!* You missed what I was saying, apparently, and instead seemed to think I was calling you a homophobe.
Why do your gay friends not deserve the tax breaks you deserve? (Simple. Clean. Not even mentioning marriage here. Just wanting to know why you feel they shouldn't have the tax breaks you have.)
Damadar 8 months ago
@Damadar
It's not like my motives for being against gay marriage are so they couldn't get tax breaks. The tax breaks on houses is out of my hands, nothing I can do can change that. I personally think honest people who pay taxes regardless of orientations should get tax breaks in my opinion. Not only that it discriminates [or whatever you want to call it] against single/unmarried people too.
dreetos 8 months ago
I would like to marry my mom. I just love her so much. I should be able to marry the person that I love!
JohnRhysMusician 1 year ago
@JohnRhysMusician The problem with this is that it would be detrimental to the gene pool as you could inbreed, so as such should not be allowed as this could cause harm to others. But the same could not be said for same sex marriage, no inbreeding, or any breeding for that matter, could occur so would not be detrimental to the human gene pool so would not cause any harm to others.
krustofskie 1 year ago
@JohnRhysMusician ur so funny
oxfordshirt 1 year ago
@JohnRhysMusician
Your offspring would be dangerously genetically disadvantaged, which is a valid justification for outlawing incest.
There is no such justification for outlawing same-sex unions.
maradashewolf 1 year ago
@maradashewolf Marriage is about children and protecting children. Since same-sex partners cannot have children I don't see the need to alter the definition of marriage to suit their personal desires.
JohnRhysMusician 1 year ago
@JohnRhysMusician So to follow your logic, if someone is infertile they should not be allowed to be married. Does that mean fertility tests should be mandatory before getting married?
krustofskie 1 year ago
@JohnRhysMusician
...that's your opinion, and you're entitled to it. I, however, am a woman married to a man, and neither of us feel any compunction to breed. We are perfectly happy with each other and our cat.
And what of couples that are incapable of producing offspring? Are you saying THEIR marriages are somehow less legitimate, due to their inability to procreate?
You might as well be saying that a woman's only worth lies in the functionality of her uterus.
maradashewolf 1 year ago
@maradashewolf
...Or that a man's only worth is in his sperm count.
maradashewolf 1 year ago
@maradashewolf I'm just saying that the purpose of marriage is to provide an environment to raise and protect children. That is fact. Marriage has been distorted by many to become a function of personal pleasure. Children need marriage. There was a great editorial in the Boston Herald about marriage. I hope you look for it.
JohnRhysMusician 1 year ago
@JohnRhysMusician
....children don't NEED marriage, any more then adults do. In fact, I have evidence supporting the assertion that many children would be better off with single parents. My mother's father beat his wife and his children viciously on a regular basis. They would have been better off if his wife had not been so mentally crippled by the prevailing societal pressures of the day, and just taken the children and left, so he couldn't beat any of them any more.
maradashewolf 1 year ago
@JohnRhysMusician Yeah because gay marriage is the same as incest. Try again Billy Bob
joshfarrow08 1 year ago
And people with brains will realize that maybe, just maybe, she's not her father. Are you yours? C'mon, she didn't choose to be Dubya's child. Cut her some slack. This issue isn't a political one, it's a moral one whether you agree or disagree.
micvelo 1 year ago
Wow. A Bush with a brain. I think Hell just froze over...!
maradashewolf 1 year ago 10
@maradashewolf well after so many idiots, they had to get a smart one eventually.
krustofskie 1 year ago
@krustofskie
LOL
Statistics demanded it! An anomaly had to pop up eventually! XD
maradashewolf 1 year ago
@maradashewolf Even so...never again please
BlueReishiMan 5 months ago
I like her voice.
sanssome 1 year ago
Sad that she would side with homosexuals even though they hate her father. There was a time when being a Republican meant something.
asd25471 1 year ago
@asd25471 lol, yes it ment somthing back in the 1800's
ristoril 1 year ago
@asd25471 As a matter of fact, she shouldn't side with anyone on this planet, as everyone hates George Bush.
sanctainquisitio 1 year ago
@sanctainquisitio If you STILL don't think we would be better off with Bush in the White House again, where have you been hibernating since Obama got elected?
asd25471 1 year ago
@asd25471 Actually, i've been here all the time, but Bush will always be hated by everyone forever... the memory of the innocent iraqi's slaughtered is still alive.
sanctainquisitio 1 year ago
maybe that was the only good thing her dad did during his presidency, maybe shes lesbian or tired of working as hooker
hazemvirus 1 year ago 2
There will allways be a leader, and a follower in a relationship. There are no equalities in a marriage, or a relationship. Even jokes in the gay community is; who is the guy and who is the lady..
larsiemannen 1 year ago
Daddy must be so proud, XD
Burori1 1 year ago 2
im not gay but i would support it to.
its the persons choice who they marry
VincehBhoi 1 year ago 2