Added: 1 year ago
From: vignyc
Views: 295,220
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (2,251)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • É empresão minha mas quando o segundo suposto avião vem a embater com a torre sul , na explosão a torres norte pipoca de brilhos e várias fumaças sai dela !

  • @Omauhumor Á esqueci de mensionar que não é fumaça causada pelo avião e sim fumaça branca que sai simuntaniamente juntas do lado de onde o avião bateu na torre norte !

  • wow you captured it from lispenard street where the only video of the first plane struck

  • 1:45 you can see someone jumping out of a window. 

  • @ValtronW :(

  • mates, can you do me a favor? keep pressing 3 and 4? and tell me how grotesque the image of that building in front of the wtc is scaled as if it was an image overlapping it? and then explain me how does the viewport changes drastically it still makes the wtc tower's perspective change looks almostly intact? is it only my impression? thumbs up if you think it's not.

  • why couldn't you just point the camera at both towers at 1:58??!

  • omg

  • I can see a bunch of people have no idea that light travels faster than light, the smoke puff was caused by the shock wave of the explosion,you hear the sound of explosion after the puff because it takes time for sound to travel far......

  • 1:55

    Thats the Sound where's Crashing the 2nd plane... it Sound's really strange and it makes me a kind of Fear...

  • thats terrorists bro thats fucking terrorists. HOOOOOLLLLLLLLY SHHHHHIIIIIITTTT

  • I find this video very peculiar indeed. It definitely reveals some incontrovertible evidence that things are not exactly as they seem and are NOTHING like we were told.

  • I'm speachless.... I just... kind understand how someone could have it in his heart to do something like this... killing thousands of innocent lives.. and at the Pentagon, and nearly the White House....

    Thank you for this footage... it is amazing.

    RIP all victims of 9/11

  • the sound of the second plane is so loud, so loud... :((

  • Why should all that smoke puff out of the north tower just a second or split second before the plane in the south tower even hit.

  • @anastasia2657 because light travel faster than sound, you see the shockwave first then hear the explosion.

  • @HAWK50CENT Yes, of course. To excuse myself, I will say that I realized that as soon as I posted the question, but it is good that you answered, should there be anyone dumber than myself out there.

  • A masterpiece in the art of war.

    I hope more attacks because the system failed me so I fail the system. LOL

  • if someone invented a time machine, most people would want to go back in time to fix things with their boyfriend or girlfriend, cheat on a test, or invent something, etc. me? i would want to get everyone out of these buildings or have flight attenedents inspect everything and everyone that boarded that plane. even if i did get a time machine to do that, no one would listen to a pre-schooler

  • 1:55 What happens with smoke when the second plane hits the south tower?

  • ikr y is he crying over 3000 people died tht day

  • damn man at 1 minute and 18 seconds poor person opened the window for oxygen and fell out so sad!!!!! i herd from accounts that the air situation was so bad up there that if you were near a window that was open people pushed to get air and some people were thrown out by accident

  • holy shit MarRRRRRRtin Thats TERRORISTS THATS THE OTHER BUILDING THAT TERRORISTS

  • look at the people jumping off!

  • IN "THE ART OF WAR" 9/11 IS A MASTERPIECE!

  • Суки, это предлог вторжения в ИРАК!

  • Thanks for the upload! I'm sure it wasn't easy to share this... but I appreciate it!

  • Ahhh like these fuckers know what kinda plane it was. " thas terrorist bro! Thas terrorist!" Lol

  • yet another fake footage,with actors in the background yelling,,fake,,

  • @BLOODYROOTSborn What the fuck? This isn't fake, what the fuck is wrong with you dude?

  • Conspiracy theorists are faggggggggggggggssssssssssssss­ssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

  • @poopmastaunlimited To each his own opinion, yet, this video isn't exactly for going on to rants on your hate for conspiracy theorist.

    Whether you are or not, it doesn't change the fact that 3000 people died.

  • @Puppetmaster195skc help us! please! azar is crying! he is crying because of these debunkers!

  • @Hotters7066 Why is he crying?

    Tell him to message me/

  • A person jumped at 1:20. It's images like that that make this so hard to watch. All you truthers can go fuck yourselves for all I care.

  • @poopmastaunlimited.. you go fuck yourself ignorant moron.. idiot..

    >> watch?v=fCZ3KNMcaz8

  • man this footage is amazing. never seen it so clearly. thanks for posting

  • HOOOOOOOOOOLY SHITAH!!!!, , LOL HEY,, WITH ALL THE HELICOPTERS AND PLANES IN THE AIR , NONE COULD HAVE FILMED MORE ANGLES OF THE SECOND PLANE????

  • @oiyabastard THE SECOND AIRPLANE WENT ROOOAAAAH BOOM!!

  • 1:29  UFO?

  • @23252558 that was not a UFO that was a helicopter

  • LOOK PEOPLE AT 6:52 ITS WHERE THE GUY SHOT THE FIRST PLANE INTO THE NORTH TOWER!!!!!!!!

  • I have been watching these videos for hours now and it saddens me that so many people died :/ R.I.P

  • The only continuous TWO HOUR VIDEO of the 9/11 wtc attacks that is known to exist. 130 minute WTC ATTACK VIDEO: 'Tuesday Morning in September'. It is something from that day you have NOT seen. You may have seen other posts about it on Youtube. It is not like so much other crap that has been put out since 9/11; it is not a propaganda, and or opinion piece. It has no fair comparison. It is 9/11 like you have never seen. You can preview the whole 130 chronicle. There is an upload on my channel

  • you can see explositions in the north tower just before the plane hits the south tower,proved this was a inside job

  • @MrMike19677 Ever been near something that blew up? The suddenly heated air creates a sound/pressure wave, like lighting. The videographer did not catch the south tower plane crash right when it happened, so you first see the north tower smoke moving from the south tower explosion. You hear the explosion later because sound is slower than light and he was obviously a distance away from the building. Watch any other 9/11 video with both towers in view...

  • what is going on at 1:55 ??

  • Look closely at the windows seconds before the impact 1:55.

  • @YoTonyValdo i just noticed that too, strange

  • 1:31 WTF IS THAT

  • @ccmattyfilms Thats a helicopter

  • 1:31 UFO

  • around 1:38 a person jumps from the building beneath the fire. It happens a few times afterwards. What a sound that plane made.....chills me to the bone

  • If this is the sound of a plane crash, I am GOD. SOOOOO Pathetic, CLE-AR-LY is the sound of a BIG, BIG BOMB!!!!

  • :'(

  • by far the best 9/11 footage ever released. kudos kudos kudos. amazing footage.

  • Comment removed

  • @DiMoNico1981Swe wtf are you talking about you retard? a volcano? wtf. god your stupid kill yourself faggot.

  • Comment removed

  • @DiMoNico1981Swe YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT.

  • Comment removed

  • @hollingstihl forgett that i wrote, you dont understand so leave behind you idiot.

  • yes we know how many people are dead, thanks for asking.

  • 1:56 incredible sound.

  • @bigcity777333 its the sound of a bomb, not the plane's impact or it blowing up!! listern carefully

  • @bigcity777333 suck ur governments cock u little cock sucker!! submit to the rule of law like a faggot!!

  • @dashiftd1 lol awwwwwwwww, are umad your a faggot? its okay little boy :) go tell mommy and come out of the closet hahhahahah

  • Its very scary to see this news, becase i thought, that USA gona send some Nuclear weapon out to the world.

  • @DiMoNico1981Swe Hell yeah,they were thinking about it

  • DAS TERRORIST DAS TERRORIST DAS TERRORIST NIGA HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA

  • so sad to hear people crying awful day

  • @ 30 seconds 3 floors below the flames at the bottom of the screen you can see people in the windows moving..

  • @00xjclassic yes I see them too and others jumping

  • What did Martin mean, at 5:15 when he said that this was "..because of Israel"? Does he still feel that way? Please explain. Thank you.

  • 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?

    Why won’t Dr. Steven Jones release the “rigorous non-critical” peer review comments offered by David L. Griscom regarding his nanothermite paper?

    Why won't Dr. Kevin Ryan allow and of his dust samples to be tested by and independent lab?

  • @ctcole77 Explain why building 7 fell at free fall speed without any resistance! Debunkers hate it when you ask them that questions. Towers 1 and 2 got hit by airplanes but what about building 7?

  • ppl that do these things to other countries because they believe in diffrent rights than them is juss so fuckin annoying. u want the right we have then get your fuckin own. dnt like wat we believe in then stay out of our fuckin way.

  • AND WE KEEP SUPPORTING ISRAEL...

  • 5:05 "ITS ALL BECAUSE OF ISRAEL"

  • Comment removed

  • 0:13 on the left side of the building you can see people jumping. gives me goosebumps.

  • @paintballbeast96 oh dude...i just noticed !! i was nearly sick

  • holy shit... the noise at 1:45 when the other plane hits, ive never heard that on any other video!

  • @mattyg19821 that sound brings horror to me.

  • @mattyg19821

    I REPLAYED IT LIKE 10 TIMES I AGREE...

  • This is horrifying, but by far the most beautiful, crisp footage I've come across

  • NotableJInx2

    poor guy

  • fuck you terrist

  • Watch the smoke squibs shoot out of the burning building right before the second plane makes impact...coincidence? No.

  • @nyr9teen9d4

    You simply see air forced out of the building by the transferred kinetic energy generated by the plane impact (thousands of mega-joule).

    Your assumption that this phenomenon appears BEFORE the plane impact is wrong, since footage from different angles proves the opposite. Dpn't jump to early conclusions, it just makes you look like another stupid conspiracy theorist.

  • If a person knows that 9/11 was a false flag operation and cover-up, can they morally rationalize or justify it? HELL NO!!!

    watch?v=MLuCj7DBqjc

    9/11: A Case Study of Ponerology

    This is a video I made, with tech assistance. If you like it, please 'Like' it. Thanks.

  • Comment removed

  • @Andy49963 stfu I'm Canadian and this still touched my heart many people died because of stupid terrorists, get real.

  • Andy u r a asshole

  • you cant keep America down though.

  • thank you for posting.. RIP herman sandler, Chris quackenbush and the other 64 at sandler o'neill south tower 104th floor. RIP

  • watch?v=g3lq7nr6098

    Excellent Analysis of WTC North Tower Exploding

  • Such a disgusting sound when it hits the building. Awful

  • @erichw23 WTC 7 blew itself out... Haha... Pentagon hit by a huge airplane : )) Iraq has WMD : ))

  • @Jakguide

    How can you stupid conspiracy fucks laugh about 9/11...yeah some smilies are definetaley appropriate.

  • 5:07 nuff said

  • The murderers are still alive among us... Comfortably.

  • @Jakguide You sheep

  • Again, I ask you, why can't Steven Jones or Harrit get their shit published in real journals?

    Why the Bentham pay-per-publish farce, whose peer-review process is evidently fraudulent?

  • Oh and, if you ask something like "has this been debunked?", you can 99.9% be sure that the answer is yes.

  • At 6:55 where Jules Naudet filmed the first impact, that van still hasn't moved since 8:46 AM that morning. I would've thought the guy who owned it would've used it to escape...

  • Patriotsquestion911(dot)com -- this website has statements from former CIA, FBI, and military officers, as well as firefighters, family members of victims, physicists, engineers, archtitects, political leaders, and more.

    firefighters are under "Survivors and Family Members"

    physicists are under "Professors"

  • @ucancallmeOh Yep, and everyone of them is basing their judgement on mis-information.  B7 fell in 7 seconds..... morons.

  • @lijebaley01

    Just ignore the troll.

  • I was on a plane wen this happened

  • 5:34 why is smoke coming out of the canalization ?

  • 9/11 was done by bush, dick cheney and rumsfield look at the theories the us government and making you guys stupid. I call the people retards who listen to the media

  • This footage is incredible: Amazing quality as well best i've seen!. This captures just how monstrously evil beyond any words this day really was.

  • Did you hear that? "Its all coz of Israel" at 5:07

  • @exoticcars1 Truth

  • is this fake?

  • HOLY FUCK!! is this real??? I've never seen it so clear...wtf someone please tell me???

  • Can't we (U.S.) all (Terroists) just get along?

  • @1:37 u can see the plane:(

  • @Summergirl169

    Could be another plane, the angle seems kinda weird.

  • The puffs of smoke from the building are NOT air pressure. They are called 'squibs' in the DEMOLITION trade.

    watch?v=g3lq7nr6098

    Excellent Analysis of WTC North Tower Exploding

  • The emonations at 1:58 is the air pressure from United Flight 175.

  • I have to save this video, but I feel really weird having to "favourite" it.

  • Only sleeping sheeple believe that this was a terorrist atack...maybe it was, but fully prepared by US big heads. Open your eyes, your mind, your heart and look what has been happening around you since then!

  • @tajak How many times have truthers been painfully proved wrong? Far more than I can count.

  • @lazyteen123  WRONG

  • @indyfan22k Care to clarify? Because I know I'm right.

  • @indyfan22k

    Yes you are wrong. Indeed.

  • @NotableJInx2 no, you are wrong !!

  • @lazyteen123 By truthers do you mean Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth?

    Richard Gage, David Ray Griffin or Jonathan Cole?

    What about Richard Humenn (Chief WTC Electrical Engineer)?

    Sir Issac Newton and his Laws of Motion, is he wrong?

    Also David Chandler & Steven Jones, physics professors?

    Scott Grainger, Kathy McGrade, or Lynn Margulis?

    Have all these experts been proved wrong? This is news to me!

  • @FamousNoName I don;t know why you put Newton in there as if he was alive during 9/11, dummy. And yes I actually have heard of these people and I still disagree with their statements.

  • @lazyteen123 Sorry, I though you said these had all been proved wrong, not that you disagree with them.

    And why do you disagree with hundreds of experts who collectively have thousands of years experience?

    I wasn't saying Newton is a truther, obviously, i meant that for the official theory to be true, his Laws of Motion must be wrong.

    Or do you also disagree with fundamental physics?

  • @FamousNoName Your using fallacious arguments to support your argument. So what that they are experts, when it comes to 9/11, time and time again they've been proven wrong.

    And no I don't disagree with the laws of motion, or physics (Another fallacious argument). Stop assuming I do because I don't believe your account of 9/11.

  • @lazyteen123 How is my argument fallacious? Im quoting facts. The ones I mentioned are of AE911Truth, they are made up of 1600+ architects, demolition experts, physicists, metallurgists, and engineers of many fields, among others. Each one has at least 20+yrs of expertise

    NIST & US Govt theory goes against the law of inertia & his 3rd law

    Watch this then respond

    /watch?v=XkXeNawHFFo

  • @FamousNoName Yes you are. You are currently using the "argument from authority" fallacy where you name a bunch of intellectuals who apparently "prove" your argument

    And the video doesn't work.

  • @lazyteen123 So if I was to name some "intellectuals" from a car manufacturer or something other than 9/11 to prove a point, would you still challenge my argument then?

    Copy the links & paste it into Google, then watch the video

  • @FamousNoName I still would. Unless you can bring up quotes and data that each individual said and cite each of them

    And, oh my god the video actually proves that it wasn't a CD as with the debris flung out in his test, debris was also found throughout lower Manhattan. .

    I urge you to go read what "Debunking9/11" has to say of the collapse of the WTC. Please do it.

  • @FamousNoName

    The point is, that out of those 1600 "architects and engineers" supporting your ludicrous conspiracy theory less than 100 have actual expertise as structural engineers.

    The other point is, these people are intersted in a new investigation only on the surface, their main goal is to make as much money as they can get away with by selling "truth" merchandise to gullible believers like you. Truthers, the real sheep.

    Oh, and did I mention all of their theories have been debunked?

  • @NotableJInx2 Do they now?

    h t t p : / /w w w 2. ae 911 truth .org / signpetition .php

    And they tell you what happens to money they gained. Right now it goes towards marketing their DVDs in Europe

    Please do mention where I can find papers of how the laws of physics & metallurgy have been debunked. Start with the iron-rich mircospheres found by USGS, Prof Steven Jones, etc in sample of WTC dust recovered minutes after the "collapse". Here's what the USGS said about this stuff in

    (cont)

  • @NotableJInx2 their evidence report

    ..dust sample were analysed in some detail by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and x-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (X-EDS). Using the scanning electron microscope, we found that much of the iron-rich dust was in fact composed of roughly spherical particles microspheres

    The presence of metallic microspheres implies that these metals were once molten, so that surface tension pulled the droplets into a roughly spherical shape. Then the molten

    (cont)

  • @FamousNoName Are you seriously bringing the XEDS scans in Harrit's paper as proof? Look at the XEDS scan for Aluminum in Fig. 15(c). Now look at the sample it represents, Fig. 12 (b)and Fig. 13. In case you aren't too bright you can tell the XEDS came from the bottom left 100x100µm square. Take a look at the red spots in the square in fig 13. Now note that the red spots contain NO aluminum. The red part of the chips contain NO aluminum, therefore NO THERMITE.

  • @NotableJInx2 (from prev)

    droplets solidified in air, preserving the information that they were once molten in the spherical shape as well as chemical information.

    Iron melts at 1538ºC, so the presence of these numerous iron-rich spheres implies a very high temperature. Too hot in fact for the fires in the WTC buildings since jet fuel (kerosene), paper and wood furniture ­ and other office materials ­cannot reach the temperatures needed to melt iron or steel."

    Has this been debunked?

  • @FamousNoName

    "Has this been debunked?"

    Yep. See here:

    h t t p : / / forums. randi. org / showpost. php?p=4607894&postcount=1694

  • @NotableJInx2 Here it comes again "the chips are primer paint". Dr Niels Harrit (an actual expert, & not some guy on a forum) wrote an article back in 2009 showing why the chips found in the WTC dust are not paint.

    h t t p : / / stj 911 .org /blog /? p= 325

    Anyway I asked about the findings of USGS.

  • @FamousNoName

    "Iron melts at 1538ºC, so the presence of these numerous iron-rich spheres implies a very high temperature."

    Not true. Iron-rich spheres can be produced in numerous ways. Even smoking cigarettes produces them. But who knows, maybe there is nano-thermite in cigarettes..

  • @NotableJInx2 Hahaha!!! You cannot be serious? I know you shill idiots have said some crap in the past but this tops the bunch.

    Does anyone else reading this comment want to back up this guy's argument that cigarettes (paper filled with dried plant), are capable of producing molten iron?

    Back to you, please name the ways in which molten iron can be produced & then cool to form spherical shapes.

    Also, name how laws of physics & metallurgy have been debunked if you're 99.9% sure

  • @FamousNoName

    Nice strawman.

    Does anyone else reading his comment feel that this dumbass does not know the difference between molten irion and iron-rich MICROSPHERES?

    "Also, name how laws of physics & metallurgy have been debunked if you're 99.9% sure"

    ROFL.

    Also, if your twoofer heroes are such experts, why can't they get their shit published in real journals?

  • @NotableJInx2 For there to be iron rich microspheres, there once had to be molten metal with high concentrations of iron. They are spherical in shape due to the its surface tension on the liquid while in the air, exactly like when you blow bubbles.

    And why do you find it funny about physics & metallurgy. For the US Govt theory to be correct, Newtons laws of motion must be wrong, as well as the melting points of metals.

    Hardly a straw man

  • @FamousNoName

    Actually the link I gave you earlier contains the debunking of the thermite claim, written by a metallurgist. Have you even read --and-- understood it?

  • @FamousNoName

    "For there to be iron rich microspheres, there once had to be molten metal with high concentrations of iron."

    An amazing insight, changing life as we know it forever.

  • @FamousNoName

    "For the US Govt theory to be correct, Newtons laws of motion must be wrong"

    Only according to delusional pinheads like you who don't know the difference between static and dynamic loads.

  • @tajak funny, for some reason only the slavic nations really like to say that.

  • At 3:21 You can see one of the devil faces

  • Alkaida no dead !!

    hauahahaha

  • Remarkable footage, Please save somewhere secure. One day it will be very important in understanding what exactly happened that day.

  • Observe at 1:58 the increase in emanations from WTC1, almost as though it was expecting the hit to its brother than would happen less than a minute later.

  • lol u sound like shia lebouf or however you spell it lol

  • 1:57... fffiiiuuuuuummm.... BOOOOOMMM !!!!!!

  • I wonder what Kramer and Newman were saying to eachother as they were watching from the window of Kramer's appartment?