Pat: this isn't Miss America, it's a vice presidential debate. Your only serious points of praise reward her for being "personable, young, having a sense of humor, looking straight into the camera and being sensational". You claim to be a political analyst? You sound like your describing a beauty contest with words like "of the 4 debaters we've seen she was the most interesting and attractive of them all". BTW just saying that she gave detailed answers to questions is not proof in and of itself
I totally agree with Pat Buchanin. Sarah Palin did an outstanding job. She is a highly bright and smart woman with total confidence. Many people are questioning her qualifications, I feel that she is very quailified to be VP. If her and McCain win this election she is going to help him get this country back on track.
Of COARSE THE VIDEO WAS EDITED TO LEASVE OUT RACHELS RESPONSE WHERE SHE SAID WE HAVE A CHOICE BETWEEN A BORING GUY THAY KNOWS THE FACTS AND AN IDIOT THAT IS EXCITING!
Of course he has a political bent, but he's pretty fair. He has been critical of all candidates. Just because you don't like his point doesn't mean he's biased.
I'm sure you'd prefer Keith Olbermann or Rachel Maddow. No political bent there, right?
" Just because you don't like his point doesn't mean he's biased."
I've watched Pat Buchanan a long time, as far back as when he was running for president. He has no credibility because of his behavior in the past, and his bias is painfully obvious. I'm not complaining about his bias, he's an op-ed columnist on TV, not a journalist. My issue is with his absolute lack of ability to point out the FACT that she did not answer ONE substantive question, not one.
"I'm sure you'd prefer Keith Olbermann or Rachel Maddow. No political bent there, right?"
Wrong. They're DEFINITELY biased. I consider them the same as Buchanan in the political commentary arena. Glorified op-ed writers, and not even very good ones. My disdain for Buchanan is based on his work in the Nixon White House, and his subsequent engagement in class warfare during his own presidential campaigns.
MAN IS DELUSIONAL LOL
peteraperson 2 years ago
wiped the floor with him? LMAO. delusions of grandeur
WakeUpDreamers77 2 years ago
Pat: this isn't Miss America, it's a vice presidential debate. Your only serious points of praise reward her for being "personable, young, having a sense of humor, looking straight into the camera and being sensational". You claim to be a political analyst? You sound like your describing a beauty contest with words like "of the 4 debaters we've seen she was the most interesting and attractive of them all". BTW just saying that she gave detailed answers to questions is not proof in and of itself
muetter 2 years ago
I totally agree with Pat Buchanin. Sarah Palin did an outstanding job. She is a highly bright and smart woman with total confidence. Many people are questioning her qualifications, I feel that she is very quailified to be VP. If her and McCain win this election she is going to help him get this country back on track.
ardww2 3 years ago
this guy should be shot.
1redroom 3 years ago
Of COARSE THE VIDEO WAS EDITED TO LEASVE OUT RACHELS RESPONSE WHERE SHE SAID WE HAVE A CHOICE BETWEEN A BORING GUY THAY KNOWS THE FACTS AND AN IDIOT THAT IS EXCITING!
EFISHANT 3 years ago
Too bad she answered hardly ANY questions. Nothing but generalities and scripted answers.
The three things I remember most from Palin the FRAUD: Taxes, maverick and Alaska.
I would never want Palin to be VP or prez.
JDubs878 3 years ago 2
That's right, she whipped his faggot loving ass! McCain/Palin 2008!
soonerscott2007 3 years ago
Pat Buchanan is a demonstrable moron and a Bigot...
Can we all agree that we don't need another stupid yokel that can't say the word "nuclear" anywhere near the White House???
Maybe in one of the publications that she reads but couldn't name, they spell it "nookular"...
FLASHMAN1973 3 years ago
"Pat Buchanan is a demonstrable moron and a Bigot..."
For the record, that wasn't meant to insinuate that his remarks HERE were bigoted, only to illustrate that Buchanan has absolutely no credibility.
FLASHMAN1973 3 years ago
No credibility? He has slammed McCain and Obama during this whole election season, McCain more so than Obama.
Pat is a brilliant political analyst and is completely fair. She won the debate.
abudi20 3 years ago
yeah, completely fair, he has no political bent at all... completely objective... lol
FLASHMAN1973 3 years ago
Of course he has a political bent, but he's pretty fair. He has been critical of all candidates. Just because you don't like his point doesn't mean he's biased.
I'm sure you'd prefer Keith Olbermann or Rachel Maddow. No political bent there, right?
abudi20 3 years ago
" Just because you don't like his point doesn't mean he's biased."
I've watched Pat Buchanan a long time, as far back as when he was running for president. He has no credibility because of his behavior in the past, and his bias is painfully obvious. I'm not complaining about his bias, he's an op-ed columnist on TV, not a journalist. My issue is with his absolute lack of ability to point out the FACT that she did not answer ONE substantive question, not one.
FLASHMAN1973 3 years ago
"I'm sure you'd prefer Keith Olbermann or Rachel Maddow. No political bent there, right?"
Wrong. They're DEFINITELY biased. I consider them the same as Buchanan in the political commentary arena. Glorified op-ed writers, and not even very good ones. My disdain for Buchanan is based on his work in the Nixon White House, and his subsequent engagement in class warfare during his own presidential campaigns.
FLASHMAN1973 3 years ago