@keiweak it was built for testing the aerial bombs and to the end of the war it was rebuilt because americans were expecting heavy fortifications in Japan. but Japans did not have any so the gun has never been used in combat.
@AdamSavage88 unless the enemy was hunkered down in a fort. patton had a devil of a time with a series or forts in Belgium if I recall. No doubt this mortar was developed, too late, to be used against such fortifications.
You all write about schwerer Gustaf. When you really mean the german super gun, search after Dora-gun. Dora was the only one of these massif weapons. Gustav was the second one of these guns, but it was never finished.
And yes, there were plans to mount it on a tank. But it was only one from the many utopic super weapons which german designers draw down in the end of the war, so you can't really take this to serious, cause it was just a mad idea and no details about this thing were written down.
.....at the height of the space war between the usa and ussr, there was a problem of writing in weightless space. NASA, MIT, and Stanford pumped in millions of dollars and years, to try and invent a pen wth ink that would work smoothly even in zero gravity space........the russians just used pencils.....
@sildenafiltartrate That story is verified bullshit. The Parker Pen Company spent about one million of its own money on such a project, but did it as a gimmick to sell something with "space" attached to it. No public money was spent.
@sildenafiltartrate that is a false story. the inventor was actually just an American engineer who wanted to help out the space program when he heard of the problems associated with using wooden pencils in a pure oxygen environment(i.e.bursting into flames). he designed it by himself. the soviets started using his design as well afterwards
@sildenafiltartrate That is so not true it is not even funny. Like seriously, the Russians purchased and used the space pens as soon as they were created, and NASA is a separate department. Also, what do you think the US used before the space pen? Pencils. Do a little research. Please. Thank you.
@sildenafiltartrate You can't use a pencil in space, the tiny layers or graphite don't stick to the paper and they float around and get caught in things.
@spoonmator yes you can use a pencil in space, isn't the gravity what makes the pencils can write... if you tourn down a paper with stuff written in pencil it falls? the answer is nope.avi
That's an old myth, NASA also used pencils. Fisher pens later developed a pressurized pen on their own that could write in zero gravity, and NASA did buy them (Why wouldn't they?) but NASA never funded the development, never asked for it, and were not involved with it in any way, they merely bought them as did incidentally the Russians if I'm not mistaken. It was a marketing gimmick, they have made much more money selling the pen to the public then they have to NASA.
@sildenafiltartrate So did the US. But graphite dust posed a substantial risk to electronics in a zero gravity environment so the space pen was invented. Shortly after, the Russians adopted a space pen as well.
I cant imagine this would be an effective implement of battle. With the long prep time(hole for base, base placement, brace placement, attachment of firing tube an finally loading and firing) and limited range. Yes effective with a hit but if you notice when the mortar fires the brace timbers fly into the air so again more prep before fire. the placement really seems like a sitting duck because I really couldnt imagine it firing but so many rounds per hour but im no expert
@RedOrchestraPro if you meant the SCHWERER GUSTAV it shot 7 tonnes shells :D,. the barrel length is 32m which gets it muzzle velocity up to 820 m/s. And the gun itself and the platform is 80 times bigger or so to Little david.
Little david, Muzzle velocity 1250 (feet per second) = 381 m / s ! and the barrel is 22 feet ( 22 feet = 6.7056 meters) the prodjectile weight is 3650-pounds
Little david could be mounted on a tank, SCHWERER GUSTAV on a railroad platform.
@RedOrchestraPro Well you have to think of it this way, the schewrer gustaf is a railway gun and is used like an artillery gun. Little David is a mortar. Mortars usually fire the shell up and over and can only be fired that way. Artillery can be fired up and over and straight to the target. No offense, but you need to see the difference.
*sigh* they don't make videos like this anymore...
EXPLOSIVEXPLOSION 1 month ago
охуеть
Yan1Dex 1 month ago
нишутя
SedegovIlya 2 months ago
Best name for a mortar so far: the ww1 canadian "Blind Pig LOLZ"... yeah...
BeefPortugues 3 months ago
too big and unwieldy. what the purpose again?
keiweak 5 months ago
@keiweak it was built for testing the aerial bombs and to the end of the war it was rebuilt because americans were expecting heavy fortifications in Japan. but Japans did not have any so the gun has never been used in combat.
gautamon 4 months ago
@gautamon I thought I had heard they used it at Okinawa to take out some fortifications neer Shuri?
AUG351 3 months ago
Lmao,what a holeeeeee...
ycebotz 5 months ago
"little"... right...
damncritics 6 months ago
Tiny-ass sight for a big-ass mortar.
KiwiLovin7 6 months ago
imagine this as a kill streak reward in call of duty
jmantime 6 months ago
I am so going to do a knock knock game at someone I hates front door wid dis
Ipwnzombs 6 months ago
Chuck Norris called. He wants his BB gun back
s2117774 7 months ago
How to make your own 914mm mortar!!! XDDD
TheMystery98 7 months ago
.....By the time its set up the enemy would be out of range....
AdamSavage88 9 months ago
@AdamSavage88 unless the enemy was hunkered down in a fort. patton had a devil of a time with a series or forts in Belgium if I recall. No doubt this mortar was developed, too late, to be used against such fortifications.
MrSGL21 7 months ago
3:03 WHAT A RECOIL OMG, destroying all around
asdxxme 10 months ago
david waaaaaaaaaaaa? little?
asdxxme 10 months ago
You all write about schwerer Gustaf. When you really mean the german super gun, search after Dora-gun. Dora was the only one of these massif weapons. Gustav was the second one of these guns, but it was never finished.
And yes, there were plans to mount it on a tank. But it was only one from the many utopic super weapons which german designers draw down in the end of the war, so you can't really take this to serious, cause it was just a mad idea and no details about this thing were written down.
TheDukeof91 1 year ago
how is this bigger than the gustav gun?
cartmanrulez32 1 year ago
@cartmanrulez32 i dont think it is,its the caliber thats bigger
BerliozT 1 year ago
mallets mortar is only 14 mm smaller than this one
Greedsux 1 year ago
Is this one available for concealed carry?
purpleravenstar 1 year ago
Rly biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig gun for biiiiiiiiiig mans :D
lapweed 2 years ago
.....at the height of the space war between the usa and ussr, there was a problem of writing in weightless space. NASA, MIT, and Stanford pumped in millions of dollars and years, to try and invent a pen wth ink that would work smoothly even in zero gravity space........the russians just used pencils.....
sildenafiltartrate 2 years ago 31
@sildenafiltartrate iv heard that befor. that is just LULZ
hatbootfish 2 years ago
@sildenafiltartrate to that i have to say pwned
CDDCX 1 year ago
@sildenafiltartrate That story is verified bullshit. The Parker Pen Company spent about one million of its own money on such a project, but did it as a gimmick to sell something with "space" attached to it. No public money was spent.
Namolis 1 year ago 6
@Namolis I think you mean the Fisher Space Pen company
killerzee11 1 year ago
@sildenafiltartrate pens are less likely to pierce space suits unlike pencils :p unless its a dull pencil.
cartmanrulez32 1 year ago
@sildenafiltartrate that is a false story. the inventor was actually just an American engineer who wanted to help out the space program when he heard of the problems associated with using wooden pencils in a pure oxygen environment(i.e.bursting into flames). he designed it by himself. the soviets started using his design as well afterwards
vegax14 10 months ago 2
@sildenafiltartrate That is so not true it is not even funny. Like seriously, the Russians purchased and used the space pens as soon as they were created, and NASA is a separate department. Also, what do you think the US used before the space pen? Pencils. Do a little research. Please. Thank you.
edawg792 9 months ago
@sildenafiltartrate You can't use a pencil in space, the tiny layers or graphite don't stick to the paper and they float around and get caught in things.
spoonmator 8 months ago
@spoonmator yes you can use a pencil in space, isn't the gravity what makes the pencils can write... if you tourn down a paper with stuff written in pencil it falls? the answer is nope.avi
sepaol 8 months ago
@sildenafiltartrate
Snopes says false.
BigJakeP 7 months ago
@sildenafiltartrate
That's an old myth, NASA also used pencils. Fisher pens later developed a pressurized pen on their own that could write in zero gravity, and NASA did buy them (Why wouldn't they?) but NASA never funded the development, never asked for it, and were not involved with it in any way, they merely bought them as did incidentally the Russians if I'm not mistaken. It was a marketing gimmick, they have made much more money selling the pen to the public then they have to NASA.
921945 7 months ago
@sildenafiltartrate then lead dust from the pencils got stick into electronics and russian spacecraft crashed.
saigonpunkid 3 months ago
@sildenafiltartrate So did the US. But graphite dust posed a substantial risk to electronics in a zero gravity environment so the space pen was invented. Shortly after, the Russians adopted a space pen as well.
mauiboynokaoi 2 months ago
I cant imagine this would be an effective implement of battle. With the long prep time(hole for base, base placement, brace placement, attachment of firing tube an finally loading and firing) and limited range. Yes effective with a hit but if you notice when the mortar fires the brace timbers fly into the air so again more prep before fire. the placement really seems like a sitting duck because I really couldnt imagine it firing but so many rounds per hour but im no expert
jtmathena 2 years ago
@jtmathena
well its atleast a good weapon as a siege weapon at citys or forts etc...
UDI1995 1 year ago
Very informative video about this monster mortar.
Howlthrug 2 years ago
@Howlthrug actually this isnt the monster mortar. the monster mortar was developed in the 1800's. lol fyi
Broodkill 1 year ago
i LOVE this gun
jasper8325 2 years ago
Man, I sure would like to push that button....BALAAAAAAMMMM!!!!
MikeofWyoming 2 years ago
only in america... i love this country :D
bubbab89 2 years ago
Shooshgun :)))
ybmarmotyb 2 years ago
*Schwehrer Gustaf
RedOrchestraPro 2 years ago
awesome. yet very inconvenient. 9500 yards in range? compare that tot he schewrer gustafs 35 kilometers (22 miles)
RedOrchestraPro 2 years ago 14
but your comparing a field artillery GUN to a field artillery MORTAR. and between the two falls the howitzer
drsta84 2 years ago
or the paris gun....
zooders 2 years ago
Much cheeper to make tho
Alotak 2 years ago
@RedOrchestraPro
and compare that to the Paris Guns 120km
MatandJezzaMusic 1 year ago
@RedOrchestraPro But needing twin sets of railway tracks would also have been very inconvenient during the invasion of Japan.
stereokid 1 year ago
@RedOrchestraPro Good coastal defense
naltrexone23X 1 year ago
@RedOrchestraPro "schewrer gustafs" what is it you cant find anything with that name on google,
heisenfeis 1 year ago
@RedOrchestraPro if you meant the SCHWERER GUSTAV it shot 7 tonnes shells :D,. the barrel length is 32m which gets it muzzle velocity up to 820 m/s. And the gun itself and the platform is 80 times bigger or so to Little david.
Little david, Muzzle velocity 1250 (feet per second) = 381 m / s ! and the barrel is 22 feet ( 22 feet = 6.7056 meters) the prodjectile weight is 3650-pounds
Little david could be mounted on a tank, SCHWERER GUSTAV on a railroad platform.
heisenfeis 1 year ago
@heisenfeis the Schwerer Gustav was going to be mounted on a tank but the project was canceled.
TheMohawkNinja 1 year ago
@TheMohawkNinja i know, but how big would that tank be to a T28 or another tank which could hold little David ?
heisenfeis 1 year ago
@heisenfeis When you put it that way... you have a good point.
TheMohawkNinja 1 year ago
@RedOrchestraPro It's a mortar, not long range artillery
LordofAoD 10 months ago
@RedOrchestraPro It's not supposed to be a long firing missile. It's just a mortar..
fyflishfy47 9 months ago
@RedOrchestraPro
It was only meant to test out bombs
KiwiLovin7 7 months ago
@RedOrchestraPro This Thing here was a Mortar , the Dora was a gun ...
Dreadnought53 7 months ago
@RedOrchestraPro Well you have to think of it this way, the schewrer gustaf is a railway gun and is used like an artillery gun. Little David is a mortar. Mortars usually fire the shell up and over and can only be fired that way. Artillery can be fired up and over and straight to the target. No offense, but you need to see the difference.
Noneofyourbusiness0 5 months ago
@RedOrchestraPro
This was a mortar, not a howitzer.
disturbedone5009 4 months ago
gotta love WWII engineering
orbcorp 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
gahy
ozzyguy67 2 years ago