@ToxiclRevieved yea i hate every water thing that's not a fish, one time i had a giant jellyfish wash up with the waves and it almost landed on my head (i freaked out so much and i swam with full speed away from it lol)
Somewhere out there is a blonde chick saying: "Are sea cucumbers like regular cucumbers because I like pickles but I don't know if a sea pickle will be salty or not". And if that same blonde watches that video she'll probably say "Bricks are shaped like rectangles, not like the gift Daddy gave me for my sweet 16!"
@BellaBrown2010 That's not a species of slug. They are no way related to each other. They two whole different species of animals. And if you think they are, breed them. All species of their own kind can be breeded into a new species. By the way, can you tell me what animals so say evolved out of the sea into insects?... because I still haven't been told when the insects came into the picture. It seems evolution left that out.
hmmm, did a fish evolved into these sea cucumbers? and star fishes? what did sea urchin evolved from? what did sea weed evolved from? did a fish evolved into sea sponges? and sea anemones? and what about octopuses? did crabs evolved from fishes also?
and first of all, what did this ONE fish had inter-course with? and where did it find food in its reach? and did it evolved out of salt waters or fresh waters?
@wisefreethinker242 Go look up some basics on taxonomy and evolution (check out talk origins). The invertebrates you mentioned came from a common ancestor shared w. vertebrates such as fish and ourselves hundreds of millions of years ago. By the time there were fish there was sexual reproduction. There was no "ONE" fish.
@Maxdwolf "Go look up some basics on tanonomy and evolution." for what, don't tell me this is another separate theory when all are one. "The invertebrates you mentioned came from a common ancestor shared w. vertebrates such as fish and ourselves hundreds of milllions of yeas ago. By the time there were fish there was sexual reproduction. There was no "ONE" fish." WOOOW... you were there?... You know, you speak as if you know this as a fact!.. stop it, just stop it okay? you're lying to yourself.
@wisefreethinker242 Were you there when the Pilgrims landed or at the battle of Waterloo? No? Then how do you know they happened? Answer: evidence. We have the fossil record and dna and some understanding of the processes involved. What do you have as a counter theory.
What do you mean for what? If you want to know what crabs, starfishes or sea cucumbers evolved from, look it up.
@Maxdwolf "Where you there when the Pilgrims landed or at the battle of Waterloo? No? Then how do you know they happened?" Hmm, because they were there and there a written history of it. Which means people knew the battle happened. And I don't think it was hard for the witness to notice the dead bodies to figure out that there was a battle that went on. No offence, but you atheists really does give me the most stupidist examples you know. And those fossil of dinosaurs proves a worldwide flood!
@wisefreethinker242 If those fossils were laid down in one event they would be jumbled together randomly rather than in in a nested hierarchy. They would also not be found with lifeforms adapted to similar habitats in sediments that are to be expected from said environments.
@Maxdwolf Of course they were jumbled together. But most of your evoluionists gods who you look up to, are not that honest to tell you that there were fossilized areas found with dinosaurs fossilized together? Besides, I think I got a few theories why many was not found. 1. Some of the salt water animals and fresh water animals like the sharks, crocodiles, alligators, and what ever else that is in the waters, and were in the water before they died out that eats meat, ate some of them.
@wisefreethinker242 Wow! you're really not getting it. The bones are not mixed randomly. No bunny rabbits are found in the Cambrian. No trilobites are found in the Cenezoic era. "Fossilized areas found with dinosaurs fossilized?" Um.. sure. Every hear of Dinosaur National Park?
I made no mention of why some fossils are not found. The rarity of fossilization is pretty well known though and irrelevant to this discussion.
@Maxdwolf "The bones are not mixed randomly. No bunny rabbits are found in the Cambrian. No trilobites are found in the Cenezoic era." Bunny rabbits? There are fossiized rabbits. And like I side, most animals that drowned most have been eat by sea animals. Once again, like sharks, crocodiles, alligators, anacondas, pythons, fishes, and any other kinds of meat eating animals that went extincted. So I think little bunnies and anything small like them would have been a little mere snack.
@wisefreethinker242 Yes, there are fossilized rabbits. And none of them are found in the Cambrian.
Why do you keep going on about what might have happened to those fossils we haven't found? Why? If anything, the problem is the opposite. We know there are fossils of more animals than could have fit on the earth in 10,000 years. Given that fossilization is rare, how do you account for that.
@Maxdwolf I never said there wasn't any fossilized rabbits, because there are. And they probably wasn't found in deserted Cambrian land areas because they must of been EATEN! you do know it took about a hundred days before the flood waters cleared up right?... More then enough time for the creatures of the deep and fresh water creatures to eat them up and move on. Not to mention the fishes that are meat eaters. Dang, you acting like this is a huge problem for creationists.
@wisefreethinker242 Ok, so animals came in and selectively ate ALL mammals and reptiles and amphibians from the Cambrian layers, all the trilobites above the Permian, all flowering plants below a certain level, e.t.c...
Not to mention how the different layers were laid down separately but all in the same event.
Considering all the other nuttiness young Earth creationism requires, no I don't think his is any problem for creationists.
@Maxdwolf Yo, I just took a look at some videos about this Cambrian, and if anything it disprove evolution. Those animals did not evolved into each other. By the way, what did they evolved into, hm? what did the trilobites evolved into? "Not to mention how the different layers were laid down separately but all in the same event." Well sounds to me a problem for your mythical beliefs. And you sure is heck right it's not a problem for me. And you talk like evolution is stead strong.
@wisefreethinker242 Let me guess, you watched some vids on the Cambrian "explosion" that claimed that all the basic lifeforms came into being at once. This is false. The foundations for the basic body types were laid during the millions of years of the Cambrian. Trilobites went extinct near the end of the Permian.
I'm not the one who claims all the layers were laid down in the same event. You do. How do you explain different types of layers being laid down in one flood?
@Maxdwolf All those different layers got laid down separately because their weight, so they separated from each other with each set taking time to settle down at their own pass. This earth is not millions of years old like you just boldly clain it to be.
@wisefreethinker242 That's an interesting theory of yours, but we know from experiments and observation that that's not how settling occurs. It also doesn't explain why this is not the patter we see in the sedimentary layers.
@Maxdwolf "There was no global flood. There are mountains of evidence that make this clear in many scientific fields." Garbage, yes there were a worldwide flood. And There is many evidence that points to it. Do you know there are salt water crocodiles, hm? fresh water sting rays or skates? which ever is it. There's even fresh water clams or some kinds of shall fish. Plus, there are fossilized giant clams found on MOUNTAINS! Now go ahead and tell me a lie about how they got there. lol
@wisefreethinker242 Yeah, aquatic species have adapted to both salt and fresh water. So?
The giant clams I heard of turned out to be a hoax. But even if they weren't it's not an issue. Mountains rise and fall. Many shallow seas have later become mountain ranges.
There's a whole section on talk-origins on why the flood doesn't work. Many videos on the subject here as well. Look them up.
@Maxdwolf "Yeah, aquatic species have adapted to both salt and fresh water. So?" So?... So that proves the worldwide flood happened, is what so. "The giant clams I heard of turned out to be a hoax." Evolution is hoax, those evolution always deny the truth. "Mountains rise and and fall." That's not how they got there, and mountains do not rise, water level rises up and down. Have you seen a mountain form?... And I've seen one of those video attempt to disprove the flood, and waste their breath.
I will not lie to you, yes, that sounds a bit possible, I will not deny. But one thing wrong with that theory, the rising tectonic plates wound of cause water to roughly flow downward and most likely to causing most of the clams to go back down into the ocean or on the ocean's edge. Those fossilized clams was caused by a rough storm, and thrashing and swirling water and mud a around, scattering them about lands and covering them up with mud, thus fossilizing them.
@Maxdwolf Sorry, the worldwide flood is not "easily debunk", you'd just like to think so. Beside, all of those fossilized animals supports the worldwide flood. Furthermore, fossilized animals is founded all over the world, in every continent, which proves this whole world was once under water. So no! no, the worldwide flood is not easily debunked. Sorry! everything points to it.
@Maxdwolf 2. Noah and has family most of ate some of them that got chilled by the freezing ice cold waters, and burned up some of the animals that began to rot. 3. The animals that came off of Noah's ark most asuredly began to eat some of the died animals before they begain to rot also. 4. The bones of some of the dead animals must have been used for tools and weapons to kill and hunt. 5. I'm sure some of the animals that were drowning swam away from each other and died apart from each other.
@wisefreethinker242 1) A family of humans would have had no significant impact on the bodies available for fossilization. 2) The number of bodies available for fossilization is not at issue here. It's the patter those fossils are found in. 3) There was no global flood. There are mountains of evidence that make this clear in many scientific fields.
@Maxdwolf Come on, life evolved from non-life? That's a myth, and that would require a "magical" moment done by a miracle working Being. and I don't won't to get you upset or anything. But you've been brainwashed! God created this universe and it's very obvious. Christ Jesus died for you and I so that we may have eternal life. Don't be deceived, and believe anything that is an idea. Have you ever had anyone lied to you? Of course you have. So what makes you think you're not being lied too?
@wisefreethinker242 Now you go on about abiogenesis. Separate issue from evolution. There are several hypotheses and how this might have occurred, but it doesn't matter. Whether the first cells developed on their own or were created, it is what we evolved from.
I can tell I'm not being lied to about evolution because I've looked at the evidence. I can tell a literal translation of the bible is nonsense because it doesn't jibe with what we know about how the world works or with logic.
@Maxdwolf Abiogenesis is false which makes evolution false. So don't act like you stone into life. NOTHING EVOLVED, EVERY ANIMAL GIVES BIRTH. STOP TALKING ABOUT IS STUPIDITY OF ONE KIND ANIMAL EVOLVED INTO A WHOLE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT KIND OF ANIMAL. YOU'RE LYING, STOP IT. Have you seen a mouse evolved into an elephent? No? then stop claiming ideas as facts!
@wisefreethinker242 The various hypotheses of abiogenesis remain valid and are not required for the theory of evolution by natural selection. The theory of evolution does not claim a mouse would morph into an elephant. But we do know as fact that they share common ancestors millions of years ago.
@Maxdwolf "The various hypotheses of abiogenesis remain valid and are not required for the theory of evolution by natural selection." Really?... Well that means you can make non-living matter and substances come to life right now then... with God not inquired! "Theory of evolution does not claim a mouse would morph into an elephant. But we do know as fact that they share common ancestors millions of years ago." Riiiggghhhht! And that sounds so much sensible and true. -_-
@Maxdwolf Oh yeah, and moreover about that little example you gave me that didn't help your theory in anyway!.. I think people in those days knew that their loved ones didn't make it back from the battle and got the news that some of the soldiers died in battle.
"if you want to know what crabs, starfishes or sea cucumbers evolved from, look it up." And let me guess, what even they say they evolved from your going to believe it no matter how illogical and stupid it sounds?
What is illogical or stupid about life evolving? Evolution is observed. Natural selection is observed and its contribution to evolution is tested and measured. The fossil record, taxonomy and dna tell us about common descent. What alternative answer do you have.
@wisefreethinker242 stop being stupid. fish are vertebraes, everything else you listed is an invertebrae. except Seaweed, which isn't even an animal. fish didn't evolve into them, because that's not how evolution works. do some god damn research before you post ignorant crap like this.
@Chernobog2 Stop being stupid?... "fish are vertebrates, everything else you listed is an invertebrate." And this explains?... "except Seaweed, which isn't even an animal." sooooo, seaweed evolved from??? hmm, I must do some research before I post ignorant comments???...
Ewwww!!! Disgusting cretrue
couchpotato918tv 9 hours ago
we saw a video in science class today were he pooped YUCK
11bluebandit 1 day ago
I'm your biggest fan...
epicguy103 2 days ago
Who was the guy that said "Hey, go film some sea cucumbers taking poops."?
24DNELSON 2 days ago
i used to watch this all the time
Spiderpiggy97 4 days ago
i love sea cucumbers, really taste good.
PsyphaX09 1 week ago
Some countries actualy eat this... Nasty. Also, as it said, it feeds on bodies, and that includes human bodies.
MabinogiFan1226 2 weeks ago
so what eats IT'S shit?
groupjapan 2 weeks ago
" To find it follow the yellow BRICKS road". Sooooo, this "sea cucumber" shits bricks. o.O
GodsFear193 2 weeks ago
eeeewwwwwwwwwww i never puttin cucumbers on my salad again!!
tRuLyiNsAnEkEiTa 2 weeks ago
SeaDildo! *ahem* Fasinating animal truley
Kobalos 1 month ago
never eating cream again
MrRandomstuff12345 1 month ago
LMFAO TRAIL OF POOP! XD!
PhengVang28 1 month ago
stay classy, Animal Planet
elSethro 1 month ago
shapeless, squidgy sausages make more squidgy sausages...
DaBunnyMasta 1 month ago
this is really informative. never really heard of these things until recently
ninthreaver 1 month ago
Kevin!
xintegratedx 2 months ago
I WISH I WAS A SEA CUCUMBER
lebamrocks 2 months ago 3
SO AWESOME
lebamrocks 2 months ago
It's pretty much a pooping tube.
nthn1989 2 months ago 2
Easy Food !!! yomi !!!!!
kazoie2007 3 months ago
so they shit sand?
MrKandamo 3 months ago
A Sea Cucumber, like the internet, is a series of tubes.
EoceneChallenger 3 months ago 2
For some strange reason, this was recommended. : /
J88Wolf 4 months ago
That's nice time to go lmao
getalife67 4 months ago
i loughed at the trombone noise while the poop but then i gagged because it was nasty
bombersander 4 months ago 4
for some people hold some strange fascination?
jaimecyu 4 months ago 13
"While most find defecation disgusting, for some people it holds a strange fascination."
That means you, Japan.
Yankees2743 5 months ago 13
What the flying fuck. How did I even get here. -shrugs-
DianaM2631 5 months ago 2
Is Stewie following this thing around with a Tuba?
Btriex 5 months ago 2
LOL, I remember watching this when I was probably 7 years old and it was like the coolest thing ever to me XD.
GodsBittersweetEmo 5 months ago
1:34
fascination
TheMaddiePie 5 months ago
sea cucumbers are the most disgusting Echinodermata i have fucking ever known.
PhuNguyen88 5 months ago
Sooo Fascinating o_O
ILovesucksI 5 months ago
Hi kevin...
TheEvilTacos 5 months ago 2
disgusting!
BellaSilvery 5 months ago
That's a big ass butthole
MusicallyUbiquitous 6 months ago
Gas como eso caga xd
mari1995100 6 months ago
after watching this i realize i sat next to one in my marine biology class...
shirokun002 6 months ago 2
did, did, did i just die from drowning in puke while I rofling?
Mogred 6 months ago
and i thought spongebob was just making it up. Its KEVIN!!
savethelephantnow 6 months ago 4
looks like poop to me.
mvarelas6 6 months ago
poopie
xxang12 6 months ago
I was walking along the shore line of a beach, then this thing started to wrap around my leg.. I almost got a heart attack LOL
ToxiclRevieved 7 months ago
@ToxiclRevieved yea i hate every water thing that's not a fish, one time i had a giant jellyfish wash up with the waves and it almost landed on my head (i freaked out so much and i swam with full speed away from it lol)
cheater30 5 months ago
Oh, how cute!
stratosl 7 months ago
oh c´mon, they are cute
TheCanadaspike 7 months ago
the music, what the hell?
GuzmanPi 7 months ago
question: why do cucumbers poop out those white things??? is it their guts????
deone67 7 months ago
@deone67 Yes.
BakuganCuber 7 months ago
Gross
ProudlyQatari 7 months ago
wholly crap...that thing's crapping every five seconds o.o
PrincessKonohana 7 months ago
classic animal planet.
whalesrock111 7 months ago
Looks like Osama pooped while he was down there.
hhnh10 7 months ago
JACKASS :)) <3
RichGirlx3 8 months ago
This is a good video
techmdda 8 months ago
le hubieran puesto INTESTINO de mar xD
chico123chido 8 months ago
the music is really funny
MsYummyskittles 8 months ago
i like the music XD
MsYummyskittles 8 months ago
lol at the horn being played while the poop comes out
VinceLA91 8 months ago
How the FUCK can you feed on SAND?!
STFUbelgium 8 months ago
Press 8 over and over. Thumbs up if you LOL'd.
Tennisdude808 9 months ago
nice hole ;)
matt280791 9 months ago
Somewhere out there is a blonde chick saying: "Are sea cucumbers like regular cucumbers because I like pickles but I don't know if a sea pickle will be salty or not". And if that same blonde watches that video she'll probably say "Bricks are shaped like rectangles, not like the gift Daddy gave me for my sweet 16!"
catacutan96 9 months ago
They just have to move in a circle and they are self sustaining!
Chabubu424 9 months ago
the music is just like farting
AL3AJEB 9 months ago
I liked this show :D
tennisacer001 9 months ago
A Shit Log that shits other shit logs after eating shit itself. Can you say 'Cinema Snob'?
WikiSorcerer 10 months ago
13 people need to go to the bathroom
rwtheorogue 10 months ago 2
That is sooooooooo weird
SuperSenben 10 months ago
I think I died when I saw that sea cucumber's "defacation".
idolfreak7 10 months ago
It's a cucumber,
It's a cucumber,
It's a cucumber,
It's a cucumber,
It's a cucumber,
It's a cucumber,
Please don't take it to the pickle farm!
dethklok6511 10 months ago 2
Something makes me wanna stab it... but at the same time... I would not for the life of me go near that!
gmanleader0 10 months ago
maybe thats why the fish is smelly
Ezprite 11 months ago
Funny creature!
moonwalker5058 11 months ago
It's like a train...from one of those horror games... Those mutated, monster, like trains! *shivers*
otakugurl111 11 months ago
eeewww this thing is really gross!!!!
luckypatrice2 11 months ago
somebody had their fiber
DobbsAquaSquids 11 months ago 6
wow... its so CHUBBY!! :D
paintosignup09 11 months ago
are the poop sound effects really necessary?
MrCrazybest123 11 months ago 34
@MrCrazybest123 You know, I think that was a trumpet.
I know this was from almost a year ago, it's fine.
JadElClemens 2 weeks ago
@JadElClemens yeah i was just commenting on why they decided to do that haha
MrCrazybest123 2 weeks ago
@MrCrazybest123 Ah, I see.
JadElClemens 2 weeks ago
did, did, did i just look at a cucumbers asshole?
drju984 1 year ago 91
@drju984 That or it's mouth.
xxxDarkcloud0xxx 6 months ago
disgusting,,,,yok
Saudiprint 1 year ago
dont some asians eat it?
nazbites 1 year ago
@nazbites Yes . They are cute and delicious.
6:
CorporalCain 1 year ago
@CorporalCain shut up there only cute
darkangelsaby 1 year ago
@darkangelsaby And delicious :D A delicacy, actually - w -
CorporalCain 1 year ago
ok that dude eats waaaay 2 much stuff and poops WAAAY too much.
basketballrox1999 1 year ago
"for some people" ???
TheMandarklaughs 1 year ago
@sweetiekims-- They are filter feeders... The have tenticals that extend and bring food too their mouth....
MsHorselover222 1 year ago
What an ugly species of SLUG.
BellaBrown2010 1 year ago
So he eats shit and then poops it out?xD
Ex7a5y 1 year ago
poop
eat poop
poop
eat poop....ect.
prudduck 1 year ago 70
This has been flagged as spam show
everybody is entitled to their own frantic ignorance.... usually shown by the use of CAPITALS
mattwinter47 1 year ago
everybody is entitled to their own frantic ignorance.... usually shown by the use of CAPITALS
mattwinter47 1 year ago
it pooped soooooo much?!
Haley974 1 year ago
Wow what an ugly species of slug.
BellaBrown2010 1 year ago
@BellaBrown2010 That's not a species of slug. They are no way related to each other. They two whole different species of animals. And if you think they are, breed them. All species of their own kind can be breeded into a new species. By the way, can you tell me what animals so say evolved out of the sea into insects?... because I still haven't been told when the insects came into the picture. It seems evolution left that out.
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
By 'strange fascination' did he mean fetish? Yea...I can see that.
CaptainWred 1 year ago
i can't believe all that poop came out of a sea cuc.
brownsugarpoptart123 1 year ago 3
it fuckin poops
David76481 1 year ago
i love the most extreme! it's so intresting and a little disgusting.. :(
candileeable 1 year ago
That would go well with my stew,yummy vegtables
lilyflowers35lol 1 year ago
it shit of him?:))
Heke1959 1 year ago
ho the hell is facinated by poop? xD
situlo 1 year ago
hmmm, did a fish evolved into these sea cucumbers? and star fishes? what did sea urchin evolved from? what did sea weed evolved from? did a fish evolved into sea sponges? and sea anemones? and what about octopuses? did crabs evolved from fishes also?
and first of all, what did this ONE fish had inter-course with? and where did it find food in its reach? and did it evolved out of salt waters or fresh waters?
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@wisefreethinker242 Go look up some basics on taxonomy and evolution (check out talk origins). The invertebrates you mentioned came from a common ancestor shared w. vertebrates such as fish and ourselves hundreds of millions of years ago. By the time there were fish there was sexual reproduction. There was no "ONE" fish.
Maxdwolf 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf "Go look up some basics on tanonomy and evolution." for what, don't tell me this is another separate theory when all are one. "The invertebrates you mentioned came from a common ancestor shared w. vertebrates such as fish and ourselves hundreds of milllions of yeas ago. By the time there were fish there was sexual reproduction. There was no "ONE" fish." WOOOW... you were there?... You know, you speak as if you know this as a fact!.. stop it, just stop it okay? you're lying to yourself.
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@wisefreethinker242 Were you there when the Pilgrims landed or at the battle of Waterloo? No? Then how do you know they happened? Answer: evidence. We have the fossil record and dna and some understanding of the processes involved. What do you have as a counter theory.
What do you mean for what? If you want to know what crabs, starfishes or sea cucumbers evolved from, look it up.
Maxdwolf 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf "Where you there when the Pilgrims landed or at the battle of Waterloo? No? Then how do you know they happened?" Hmm, because they were there and there a written history of it. Which means people knew the battle happened. And I don't think it was hard for the witness to notice the dead bodies to figure out that there was a battle that went on. No offence, but you atheists really does give me the most stupidist examples you know. And those fossil of dinosaurs proves a worldwide flood!
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@wisefreethinker242 If those fossils were laid down in one event they would be jumbled together randomly rather than in in a nested hierarchy. They would also not be found with lifeforms adapted to similar habitats in sediments that are to be expected from said environments.
Maxdwolf 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf Of course they were jumbled together. But most of your evoluionists gods who you look up to, are not that honest to tell you that there were fossilized areas found with dinosaurs fossilized together? Besides, I think I got a few theories why many was not found. 1. Some of the salt water animals and fresh water animals like the sharks, crocodiles, alligators, and what ever else that is in the waters, and were in the water before they died out that eats meat, ate some of them.
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@wisefreethinker242 Wow! you're really not getting it. The bones are not mixed randomly. No bunny rabbits are found in the Cambrian. No trilobites are found in the Cenezoic era. "Fossilized areas found with dinosaurs fossilized?" Um.. sure. Every hear of Dinosaur National Park?
I made no mention of why some fossils are not found. The rarity of fossilization is pretty well known though and irrelevant to this discussion.
Maxdwolf 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf "The bones are not mixed randomly. No bunny rabbits are found in the Cambrian. No trilobites are found in the Cenezoic era." Bunny rabbits? There are fossiized rabbits. And like I side, most animals that drowned most have been eat by sea animals. Once again, like sharks, crocodiles, alligators, anacondas, pythons, fishes, and any other kinds of meat eating animals that went extincted. So I think little bunnies and anything small like them would have been a little mere snack.
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@wisefreethinker242 Yes, there are fossilized rabbits. And none of them are found in the Cambrian.
Why do you keep going on about what might have happened to those fossils we haven't found? Why? If anything, the problem is the opposite. We know there are fossils of more animals than could have fit on the earth in 10,000 years. Given that fossilization is rare, how do you account for that.
Maxdwolf 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf I never said there wasn't any fossilized rabbits, because there are. And they probably wasn't found in deserted Cambrian land areas because they must of been EATEN! you do know it took about a hundred days before the flood waters cleared up right?... More then enough time for the creatures of the deep and fresh water creatures to eat them up and move on. Not to mention the fishes that are meat eaters. Dang, you acting like this is a huge problem for creationists.
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@wisefreethinker242 Ok, so animals came in and selectively ate ALL mammals and reptiles and amphibians from the Cambrian layers, all the trilobites above the Permian, all flowering plants below a certain level, e.t.c...
Not to mention how the different layers were laid down separately but all in the same event.
Considering all the other nuttiness young Earth creationism requires, no I don't think his is any problem for creationists.
Maxdwolf 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf Yo, I just took a look at some videos about this Cambrian, and if anything it disprove evolution. Those animals did not evolved into each other. By the way, what did they evolved into, hm? what did the trilobites evolved into? "Not to mention how the different layers were laid down separately but all in the same event." Well sounds to me a problem for your mythical beliefs. And you sure is heck right it's not a problem for me. And you talk like evolution is stead strong.
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@wisefreethinker242 Let me guess, you watched some vids on the Cambrian "explosion" that claimed that all the basic lifeforms came into being at once. This is false. The foundations for the basic body types were laid during the millions of years of the Cambrian. Trilobites went extinct near the end of the Permian.
I'm not the one who claims all the layers were laid down in the same event. You do. How do you explain different types of layers being laid down in one flood?
Maxdwolf 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf All those different layers got laid down separately because their weight, so they separated from each other with each set taking time to settle down at their own pass. This earth is not millions of years old like you just boldly clain it to be.
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@wisefreethinker242 That's an interesting theory of yours, but we know from experiments and observation that that's not how settling occurs. It also doesn't explain why this is not the patter we see in the sedimentary layers.
Maxdwolf 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf Excuse the grammar, I meant "thrashing and swirling water and mud around,".
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf "There was no global flood. There are mountains of evidence that make this clear in many scientific fields." Garbage, yes there were a worldwide flood. And There is many evidence that points to it. Do you know there are salt water crocodiles, hm? fresh water sting rays or skates? which ever is it. There's even fresh water clams or some kinds of shall fish. Plus, there are fossilized giant clams found on MOUNTAINS! Now go ahead and tell me a lie about how they got there. lol
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@wisefreethinker242 Yeah, aquatic species have adapted to both salt and fresh water. So?
The giant clams I heard of turned out to be a hoax. But even if they weren't it's not an issue. Mountains rise and fall. Many shallow seas have later become mountain ranges.
There's a whole section on talk-origins on why the flood doesn't work. Many videos on the subject here as well. Look them up.
Maxdwolf 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf "Yeah, aquatic species have adapted to both salt and fresh water. So?" So?... So that proves the worldwide flood happened, is what so. "The giant clams I heard of turned out to be a hoax." Evolution is hoax, those evolution always deny the truth. "Mountains rise and and fall." That's not how they got there, and mountains do not rise, water level rises up and down. Have you seen a mountain form?... And I've seen one of those video attempt to disprove the flood, and waste their breath.
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@wisefreethinker242 Mountains do rise and fall. We have actually measured the motion of the mountains and tectonic plates.
The flood is one of the easiest myths of the bible to debunk. I'm amazed at the disconnect required to ignore all the evidence that it's pure hoakum.
Maxdwolf 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf Sorry, been busy!
I will not lie to you, yes, that sounds a bit possible, I will not deny. But one thing wrong with that theory, the rising tectonic plates wound of cause water to roughly flow downward and most likely to causing most of the clams to go back down into the ocean or on the ocean's edge. Those fossilized clams was caused by a rough storm, and thrashing and swirling water and mud a around, scattering them about lands and covering them up with mud, thus fossilizing them.
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf Sorry, the worldwide flood is not "easily debunk", you'd just like to think so. Beside, all of those fossilized animals supports the worldwide flood. Furthermore, fossilized animals is founded all over the world, in every continent, which proves this whole world was once under water. So no! no, the worldwide flood is not easily debunked. Sorry! everything points to it.
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf 2. Noah and has family most of ate some of them that got chilled by the freezing ice cold waters, and burned up some of the animals that began to rot. 3. The animals that came off of Noah's ark most asuredly began to eat some of the died animals before they begain to rot also. 4. The bones of some of the dead animals must have been used for tools and weapons to kill and hunt. 5. I'm sure some of the animals that were drowning swam away from each other and died apart from each other.
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@wisefreethinker242 1) A family of humans would have had no significant impact on the bodies available for fossilization. 2) The number of bodies available for fossilization is not at issue here. It's the patter those fossils are found in. 3) There was no global flood. There are mountains of evidence that make this clear in many scientific fields.
Maxdwolf 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf Come on, life evolved from non-life? That's a myth, and that would require a "magical" moment done by a miracle working Being. and I don't won't to get you upset or anything. But you've been brainwashed! God created this universe and it's very obvious. Christ Jesus died for you and I so that we may have eternal life. Don't be deceived, and believe anything that is an idea. Have you ever had anyone lied to you? Of course you have. So what makes you think you're not being lied too?
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@wisefreethinker242 Now you go on about abiogenesis. Separate issue from evolution. There are several hypotheses and how this might have occurred, but it doesn't matter. Whether the first cells developed on their own or were created, it is what we evolved from.
I can tell I'm not being lied to about evolution because I've looked at the evidence. I can tell a literal translation of the bible is nonsense because it doesn't jibe with what we know about how the world works or with logic.
Maxdwolf 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf Abiogenesis is false which makes evolution false. So don't act like you stone into life. NOTHING EVOLVED, EVERY ANIMAL GIVES BIRTH. STOP TALKING ABOUT IS STUPIDITY OF ONE KIND ANIMAL EVOLVED INTO A WHOLE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT KIND OF ANIMAL. YOU'RE LYING, STOP IT. Have you seen a mouse evolved into an elephent? No? then stop claiming ideas as facts!
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@wisefreethinker242 The various hypotheses of abiogenesis remain valid and are not required for the theory of evolution by natural selection. The theory of evolution does not claim a mouse would morph into an elephant. But we do know as fact that they share common ancestors millions of years ago.
Maxdwolf 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf "The various hypotheses of abiogenesis remain valid and are not required for the theory of evolution by natural selection." Really?... Well that means you can make non-living matter and substances come to life right now then... with God not inquired! "Theory of evolution does not claim a mouse would morph into an elephant. But we do know as fact that they share common ancestors millions of years ago." Riiiggghhhht! And that sounds so much sensible and true. -_-
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@Maxdwolf Oh yeah, and moreover about that little example you gave me that didn't help your theory in anyway!.. I think people in those days knew that their loved ones didn't make it back from the battle and got the news that some of the soldiers died in battle.
"if you want to know what crabs, starfishes or sea cucumbers evolved from, look it up." And let me guess, what even they say they evolved from your going to believe it no matter how illogical and stupid it sounds?
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
@wisefreethinker242 The point was to rely on evidence.
What is illogical or stupid about life evolving? Evolution is observed. Natural selection is observed and its contribution to evolution is tested and measured. The fossil record, taxonomy and dna tell us about common descent. What alternative answer do you have.
Maxdwolf 1 year ago
@wisefreethinker242 stop being stupid. fish are vertebraes, everything else you listed is an invertebrae. except Seaweed, which isn't even an animal. fish didn't evolve into them, because that's not how evolution works. do some god damn research before you post ignorant crap like this.
Chernobog2 1 year ago
@Chernobog2 Stop being stupid?... "fish are vertebrates, everything else you listed is an invertebrate." And this explains?... "except Seaweed, which isn't even an animal." sooooo, seaweed evolved from??? hmm, I must do some research before I post ignorant comments???...
wisefreethinker242 1 year ago
Weeew Cucumber Eats SHIT! Whooooo!!
mruaeboss 1 year ago
Nature is funny, all I wanna shout is WHAT THE FUCK!?!?!?
victorragingredlma 1 year ago
I was lookingfor this video forever. i saw this years ago and I could never find it.
paynefanbro 1 year ago 2
wait, so does that mean OTHER sea cucumbers will eat that pop? O.o
AoEVideos 1 year ago 2
man i've dived 15 feet just to put my hands on one of em
ive took it to the surface of the water and locked on it agianst the sun lol it was all red
ImGodUFUCK 1 year ago
HAHAHAHA love the tuba
metalicrose1618 1 year ago 4
It reminds me of my long uncircumcised penis.
stealthkiller2107 1 year ago
@stealthkiller2107 I hope thats not what your semen looks like
Mzilla2 1 year ago
it shits thick silly string :D
RamboSaidKachow 1 year ago
not as cute as i though it would be intact that is totally gross
540deltron 1 year ago
watch part 0:40 hahahaha hilarious
TheBlank1988 1 year ago
watch part o:43 hahaha hilarious
TheBlank1988 1 year ago
the music really fits the animal.
Phlownomenous 1 year ago
detritus
sullycrashers 1 year ago
nasty
londoncars1 1 year ago
I don't want these biscuits anymore..
blaa94 1 year ago 4
soooo sexy!!! xDDD
Harreson88 1 year ago
what show is this from?
jelled77 1 year ago
@jelled77 from the show "The Most Extreme animals " or without animals i think
kokaliarakos 1 year ago
@jelled77 lol
Phlownomenous 1 year ago
im from Greece and i spet most of my summer in the sea and you would be suprised by the hundreds of these that i have spoted...
ad0nakis0o 1 year ago
1:30 is lol
tailsdollisawsome 1 year ago
at some times i wish i was a sea cucumber so i could mate with other sea cucumbers........if only dreams came true.
schnishna 1 year ago
i love the trumpet sounds for the shit
kashewz 1 year ago 2
That's nasty xD 0:45
ThePajama123 1 year ago
most extreme is awsome!
achappy713 1 year ago
1:32 - 1:38 LOL
MackenziePink 1 year ago
Did its crap get autotuned?
MultiMoonkin 1 year ago 4
so it cleans up shit but makes but makes more O_O
thatonekidperson123 1 year ago
eww !! haha the music goes great with the pooping =D
adelaideanne 1 year ago
mmm... Yummie!
LaCelestia 1 year ago
lol i saw this on a school doco
Gahman900 1 year ago
Danng it poops every foot... I wonder if its soft?
MicroOrginisum 1 year ago
I wanna poke it.
jwloohou2 1 year ago 36
this thing shits a LOT
maybe thats cuz it eats shit????
g0dslayer 1 year ago
i would to fuck that thing in its ass
rrabbit1725 1 year ago
1:42; I would shove a stick up that hole!
123reymysterio 1 year ago 3