Somewhat shaky performance but very nice. I love the second part where the tempo shifts, so moving. Joplin was a genius who ranks with Beethoven, Mozart, and Chopin among the great composers for piano.
Yeah, its odd that his later works aren't as popular. I can completely see what you meant when you said he later evolved as composer. I'm kind of curious what he could have become had he lived longer, and was more exposed to a wider variety of composers like Rachmaninoff and stuff. By the way, did he write any "darker" stuff?
HuffPuff If this is how you play when NOT in practice then how do sound when up to scratch and in fine fettle?Excellent performance.Thank you for your effort.
Wow, thank you. Let me explain. I was at my best by 1989, and afterwards no longer was practicing regularly. When I recorded THIS, I'd just spent an entire year out of the country! I know that people say I should practice and repost, but that is in the future, so I wanted to capture what was left of the past before more of it degenerated! But thanks-- I am encouraged and have started reading through the other rags I used to play. :-)
Sorry not to be much in practice at the moment. It will take me a while to relearn everything I used to play years ago. Glad people are appreciating the remnants I post here.
Thanks. It was just a small camera left on a table. I do have access to mikes but no longer access to that particular piano. When I get settled I can try again with a mike on my own piano.
Funny, the run in the beginning section reminds me of maple leaf rag. I would have to say this is a beautiful ragtime song but it doesnt display much emotion. In other words its really bubbly and bouncy song xD
you know why it reminds you of the maple leaf rag? because i is a maple leaf rag clone. just like the sugar cane. if you listen closely theyre both of the same family. Scott Joplin, wat he did was take the maple leaf rag, his first song, and he changed a few notes but remained in the same ladder.
Love your tempo.....being a drummer and knowing the power of steady tempo....at 2:40sec pull back on the left hand pickup notes and sit in the tempo.....This will add to the power of the piece....you rushed the last section and lost what you set up in the beginning. Re-Record it after practicing those powerful pickup notes and sit in the tempo. Let the piece finish itself...you need not rush to the finish. Revel in the last section like you never want it to end.
So enjoyed your rendition !!! I've played Joplin on church organs, ... accordions ... and yes ... even pianos. Love the tempo and style ..... BRAVO !!!
You sound great. Very clean, especially on the 8ves! Not too fast, not "over-interpreted," just right. I like when people let the music speak for itself! Beautiful piece!
Well, music started to go from first the marching bands and then ragtime to stride piano (e.g. Fats Waller) and blues scale influenced pieces (Jelly Roll Morton), to Dixieland Jazz in the 1920s... Pardon me if this is off as I am typing it from memory without checking wikipedia... >:)
Thanks for posting! Great job playing...I'm going through a 1910's phase with music. I don't play any instruments, but I'm wondering what types of music would have been popular from 1910-1920. Is rag the main type of music that was popular then? Was the music of the 1910's much different from the 20's?
I would say that from 1910-1920s the dominant form of music would be ragtime, although support for it began waning at about 1913 in favor of jazz. I am not quite sure myself, but that's what most of my sources tell me. Anybody able to confirm?
Fantastic! Thanks for posting it! I first heard the tune by Joshua Rifkin in the 80s and it really "hit" me. Now it hits me again by your playing. Its beautiness moves me to tears! Great music!
Wow, I was reading this most wonderful comment and then saw that it had been sitting two weeks awaiting approval. (Somehow the notice didn't email me this time...) I am delighted you reenjoyed it after first hearing it in the 80s by Rifkin as I did. (And I was also glad to see where you are from.) THANKS!
Hi-- Er, I think I last used sheet music for this more than 25 years ago! Luckily, unlike the couple of Joplin's pieces with copyright issues, you shouldn't have a hard time finding it published in complete collections...
I'd had five years of once-a-week classical lessons at that point. Then I came across some recordings of Joplin and Rifkin. I had sheet music for reference, but almost instantly memorized and practiced the rags on my own, improving somewhat for several more years. Good luck to you.
This is mechanically sound for sure. Check out Chocotiger's posts.. he's really disgusting.. you are plenty awesome but choco is rediculous.. seriously... BTW how did you get to the point of recording this vid? Lessons,school,ear,etc... I am unfortunately illiterate and have only my ear. I can do entertainer B+ and the first 90 seconds of maple leaf c+ and I am now picking up solace (which is shaping up to be easier) but you're basically playing it virtuoso... what led up to that level?
Uh, I was extremely motivated, and I had already learned the Maple Leaf, so it wasn't hard for me, though I played better after more years of practice after learning it. Try slowly and keep at it... Good luck, and glad to inspire others to try it! (This video is just a snapshot of where I was after not getting to play for a while, before I lost ALL skills...)
I disagree with Doug, I think your tempo is perfect. Rifkin generally does play with extraordinary refinement but I think his recording of Gladiolus lacks enough energy. Other comments about bringing the left hand down a bit and the varying the dynamics are valid.
Although you're entitled to you're opinion---i would like to bring to you're attention that Rifkin's 1970 version of Gladious is THE ALBUM that started THE WHOLE JOPLIN REVIVAL---Piano RAGS by Scott JOPLIN--Rifkin is a music Scholar and he plays according to JOPLIN'S OWN School of Ragtime(1908)Joplin published it HIMSELF so we would ALWAYS AND FOREVER KNOW that it was HIM SPEAKING---before Rifkin's 1970 album it was JOPLIN WHO???
I haven't heard JR's recording since borrowing a cassette in 1980, so I guess I should again sometime. (But I have not practiced in recent years- had other things going on. This video was taken several years ago, too!)
Youre playing this rag a little too fast. a tempo of 65 is perfect. also sounds like you are playing some wrong notes. when you start the C section (in D flat) its too loud - the marking in the music is messo piano, and its a very slow gradual build up to the climax of the D section. Gladiolus Rag is perhaps Joplin's best crafted piano rags, and it is very majestic. Listin to Joshua Rifkin's version several times.
They do, and it's because they're in the same key. Sometimes I mix up the two, and play the A section of Maple Leaf, followed by the B section of Gladioulus.
I'm sorry - I have to disagree here ...unfortunately I first listend to 90% of Joplin's music via Joshua Rifkin...and if you listen to Rifkin's perfection - it ruins all other versions. My good man - you don't emphasize the subtleties that need emphasizing - and you just bang your way through it. Those who mention Rifkin really should emulate his emotion brought to Joplin's masterpieces.
Sorry to disappoint. I've played with more rubato and sensitivity at times-- each time is influenced by what the mood is at the moment. (This was, I think, right after recording the ML, so that was that mood) Do you have a vid somewhere?
omg I love this rag that was a job well done! I really want to learn it now I'm sorry to say this, but I'm another person now you made want to play this :p
also at around 2:40 you speed up just a tad, it could be because it's your favorite part and you get excited but keep the tempo nice and steady like it was before:)
this tempo is perfect. you do a spectacular job of making the right hand sing, especially when going up high, meanwhile making the left hand nice and strong but not too overpowering and drowning out the right hand. however i think you can even bring the left hand down even more and bring the right hand out more. sounds great!! you made me want to learn this piece, before seeing your video i never even heard of the gladiolus rag, now i can't wait to learn it!!
wonderful job hflpuf! keep playing, you have an awesome gift, and obviously aren;t afraid to work hard to perfect your art...fight the good fight! ~a grfndor
Why thank you. It's really heartening after playing for hours alone at age thirteen and unable to tell the composer that I loved his works, and now having people enjoy it. Well, keep plugging away slowly and eventually your brain will build the proper pathways to manage it. Good luck!
I like the way you play this. It's one of my favorite's by Joplin. Maple Leaf Rag is another favorite (and yes, to earlier poster, the two songs do sound somewhat alike. Ragtime, especially when written by same composer, does tend to do that.)
Some of them are indeed isomorphic and almost insipid, but his later works show some progress. Some of them aren't played or found often because the copyrights keeps them out of anthologies.
Well you think it is because I will bet you don't play it. But if you play ragtime you eventually realize they sound very different! I used to think the same thing until i started playing it.
Joplin didn't write "jazz" music as you've tagged it, he saw himself as Classical composer...just to point that out. You should play it a bit slower with a bit of rubato, it really makes all the difference.
True. (But 'jazz' on a tag brings in viewers doing time travel. >;-) I'm glad you said this, because I used to really overdo the rubato once upon a time, having come into ragtime after playing a lot of exaggerrated rubato on Chopin... I have to fight not to do that too much. Well, will try another round soon...
Yes! I could play the third section forever, especially from the part going into its replay. It sounds so complex with those harmonies you note-- I was amazed that a lot of it was just from the thumb notes.
Beautiful! I've been trying to decide which Joplin piece to tackle next, and even though I've heard recordings of Gladiolus many times, your rendition may have inspired me to learn it. Thanks for a really nice performance.
Nice job! From one Joplin fan to another.
ChopJoplGershw 6 months ago
can this be played slower? it says slow march tempo and i was just wondering :)
13crazycopes 10 months ago
Somewhat shaky performance but very nice. I love the second part where the tempo shifts, so moving. Joplin was a genius who ranks with Beethoven, Mozart, and Chopin among the great composers for piano.
ManilaSyndicate 11 months ago
Excellent! This my favourite Scott Joplin rag
Ismokehis 1 year ago
:) I played it last night and people wanted to know which one it was. We all love it.
huflpuf 1 year ago
I wish the sound quality is better because I really like this piece of music and I like the way you play it
carolchill 1 year ago
@carolchill kind of makes it sound like a record though.
woodswalker 1 year ago
Superb
westfield90 1 year ago
very good i realy enjoyed this. keep playing you are good
vladinho7 1 year ago
lovely!
danielzandbergen 1 year ago
lovely!
danielzandbergen 1 year ago
lol... "Sorry there was no YouTube in the 80s"
Yeah, its odd that his later works aren't as popular. I can completely see what you meant when you said he later evolved as composer. I'm kind of curious what he could have become had he lived longer, and was more exposed to a wider variety of composers like Rachmaninoff and stuff. By the way, did he write any "darker" stuff?
IgorTheClown 1 year ago
HuffPuff If this is how you play when NOT in practice then how do sound when up to scratch and in fine fettle?Excellent performance.Thank you for your effort.
Squarerig 2 years ago
Wow, thank you. Let me explain. I was at my best by 1989, and afterwards no longer was practicing regularly. When I recorded THIS, I'd just spent an entire year out of the country! I know that people say I should practice and repost, but that is in the future, so I wanted to capture what was left of the past before more of it degenerated! But thanks-- I am encouraged and have started reading through the other rags I used to play. :-)
huflpuf 2 years ago
you bring a legend back to life. MORE plz
wolfieuk 2 years ago
much appreciated (gee!)
Sorry not to be much in practice at the moment. It will take me a while to relearn everything I used to play years ago. Glad people are appreciating the remnants I post here.
huflpuf 2 years ago
Well played!.
Is this a fairly easy piece to play? I can play Maple Leaf Rag. How does this compare?
Thanks :)
MusicGuru12 2 years ago
It is similar! Some need to be accurate in spread-out chord clusters in r.h., but it does compare to M.L. Good luck!
huflpuf 2 years ago
Great job! I very much a Joshua Rifkin fan too. Your version has its own flavor - more bouncy!
cebukid70 2 years ago
Thank you much1
huflpuf 2 years ago
Enjoyed this a lot! How much did that Steinway cost you?
keiichi189 2 years ago
Dunno--- it was my housemate's. :)
huflpuf 2 years ago
Very well played! :D
However, Ragtime is not suppose to be played fast!
X
MrDashey8 2 years ago
Yes I know, that was a finger error. :) I went on anyhow.
huflpuf 2 years ago
oops, I meant that to answer the comment below.
Yes, I know about SJ's caveat. :> (But have you heard the later parts of his OWN recording of the MLR? Makes you wonder!)
huflpuf 2 years ago
Mistake at 0:30 sorry I am fussy lol no playing the same note >:D its a cadence
Averilli1 2 years ago
Yes I know, that was a finger error. :) Sorry.
huflpuf 2 years ago
No its all right your the one actually playing it :)
Averilli1 2 years ago
At least you recognized how it is supposed to go!
huflpuf 2 years ago
Great playing.
TheCinemaization 2 years ago
Thanks. I'm glad so many people are enjoying the piece.
huflpuf 2 years ago
Sounds sort of like the Maple Leaf Rag.
TheCinemaization 2 years ago
Thanks. It was just a small camera left on a table. I do have access to mikes but no longer access to that particular piano. When I get settled I can try again with a mike on my own piano.
huflpuf 2 years ago
u need to replay this with better microphone placement. I like your feeling for the piece, try again with better sound please!
bonerici 2 years ago
Ow, sorry to hear. (I have carpal tunnel but piano is ok-- it's stringed instruments that are the trouble.)
huflpuf 2 years ago
Wish I didn't have arthritis, used to play the piano...
Well done, thank you. kwd...
ensign962114 2 years ago
Funny, the run in the beginning section reminds me of maple leaf rag. I would have to say this is a beautiful ragtime song but it doesnt display much emotion. In other words its really bubbly and bouncy song xD
Jonehz0r 2 years ago
you know why it reminds you of the maple leaf rag? because i is a maple leaf rag clone. just like the sugar cane. if you listen closely theyre both of the same family. Scott Joplin, wat he did was take the maple leaf rag, his first song, and he changed a few notes but remained in the same ladder.
RoulaSilvy 2 years ago
Ah! Wow! cool, never noticed that! I have to listen to all three again. You can hear those repeating chords in the middle, just like in Maple Leaf!
SmartStart24 2 years ago
Love your tempo.....being a drummer and knowing the power of steady tempo....at 2:40sec pull back on the left hand pickup notes and sit in the tempo.....This will add to the power of the piece....you rushed the last section and lost what you set up in the beginning. Re-Record it after practicing those powerful pickup notes and sit in the tempo. Let the piece finish itself...you need not rush to the finish. Revel in the last section like you never want it to end.
John-hans melcher
johnnyzing 2 years ago
So enjoyed your rendition !!! I've played Joplin on church organs, ... accordions ... and yes ... even pianos. Love the tempo and style ..... BRAVO !!!
Fixnitup 2 years ago
this is my favorite joplin rag right now
gurnblanston24 2 years ago
scott joplin's song is really great
his songs really practice your eyes and finger-fast moving :)
Senefleder55 2 years ago
Sooo awesome... would love to hear a good recording of that!
pignanelli 2 years ago
You sound great. Very clean, especially on the 8ves! Not too fast, not "over-interpreted," just right. I like when people let the music speak for itself! Beautiful piece!
art2art 2 years ago
Well, music started to go from first the marching bands and then ragtime to stride piano (e.g. Fats Waller) and blues scale influenced pieces (Jelly Roll Morton), to Dixieland Jazz in the 1920s... Pardon me if this is off as I am typing it from memory without checking wikipedia... >:)
huflpuf 3 years ago
Thanks. Okay, I guess I'll turn ratings on-- should have done this years ago, I guess, since people wish it. :)
huflpuf 3 years ago
Thanks for posting! Great job playing...I'm going through a 1910's phase with music. I don't play any instruments, but I'm wondering what types of music would have been popular from 1910-1920. Is rag the main type of music that was popular then? Was the music of the 1910's much different from the 20's?
TolsmaLMC 3 years ago
I would say that from 1910-1920s the dominant form of music would be ragtime, although support for it began waning at about 1913 in favor of jazz. I am not quite sure myself, but that's what most of my sources tell me. Anybody able to confirm?
josiah566 2 years ago
i believe there was a nice bit of jazz around then, but i'm unsure :D
panther8000 2 years ago
Very good. I wish I could give you a 5 star rating!
shplups 3 years ago
Fantastic! Thanks for posting it! I first heard the tune by Joshua Rifkin in the 80s and it really "hit" me. Now it hits me again by your playing. Its beautiness moves me to tears! Great music!
Greetings from Jo from Bremen
boowoojo 3 years ago
Wow, I was reading this most wonderful comment and then saw that it had been sitting two weeks awaiting approval. (Somehow the notice didn't email me this time...) I am delighted you reenjoyed it after first hearing it in the 80s by Rifkin as I did. (And I was also glad to see where you are from.) THANKS!
huflpuf 3 years ago
Hi-- Er, I think I last used sheet music for this more than 25 years ago! Luckily, unlike the couple of Joplin's pieces with copyright issues, you shouldn't have a hard time finding it published in complete collections...
huflpuf 3 years ago
Would it be possible for you to send me the sheet music?
If not, I understand, so don't worry too much about it.
iamsorrydude 3 years ago
Thank you. Gee, this is great- I've been busy with other things than piano, yet meanwhile people can enjoy this piece through the internet.
huflpuf 3 years ago
Damn, you're good. Nice job!
buffalocrotch 3 years ago
I'd had five years of once-a-week classical lessons at that point. Then I came across some recordings of Joplin and Rifkin. I had sheet music for reference, but almost instantly memorized and practiced the rags on my own, improving somewhat for several more years. Good luck to you.
huflpuf 3 years ago
This is mechanically sound for sure. Check out Chocotiger's posts.. he's really disgusting.. you are plenty awesome but choco is rediculous.. seriously... BTW how did you get to the point of recording this vid? Lessons,school,ear,etc... I am unfortunately illiterate and have only my ear. I can do entertainer B+ and the first 90 seconds of maple leaf c+ and I am now picking up solace (which is shaping up to be easier) but you're basically playing it virtuoso... what led up to that level?
gulgul2006 3 years ago
I'm Jealous!!!
lavampire 3 years ago
Uh, I was extremely motivated, and I had already learned the Maple Leaf, so it wasn't hard for me, though I played better after more years of practice after learning it. Try slowly and keep at it... Good luck, and glad to inspire others to try it! (This video is just a snapshot of where I was after not getting to play for a while, before I lost ALL skills...)
huflpuf 3 years ago
nice and good tempo to me! im thinking of learning this rag. is it hard? how long did it take you to learn?
juliaCSL 3 years ago
I disagree with Doug, I think your tempo is perfect. Rifkin generally does play with extraordinary refinement but I think his recording of Gladiolus lacks enough energy. Other comments about bringing the left hand down a bit and the varying the dynamics are valid.
Chnarles 3 years ago
Although you're entitled to you're opinion---i would like to bring to you're attention that Rifkin's 1970 version of Gladious is THE ALBUM that started THE WHOLE JOPLIN REVIVAL---Piano RAGS by Scott JOPLIN--Rifkin is a music Scholar and he plays according to JOPLIN'S OWN School of Ragtime(1908)Joplin published it HIMSELF so we would ALWAYS AND FOREVER KNOW that it was HIM SPEAKING---before Rifkin's 1970 album it was JOPLIN WHO???
illidnarg 3 years ago
I haven't heard JR's recording since borrowing a cassette in 1980, so I guess I should again sometime. (But I have not practiced in recent years- had other things going on. This video was taken several years ago, too!)
huflpuf 3 years ago
Youre playing this rag a little too fast. a tempo of 65 is perfect. also sounds like you are playing some wrong notes. when you start the C section (in D flat) its too loud - the marking in the music is messo piano, and its a very slow gradual build up to the climax of the D section. Gladiolus Rag is perhaps Joplin's best crafted piano rags, and it is very majestic. Listin to Joshua Rifkin's version several times.
Doug19752533 3 years ago
Yes, when I first heard the beginning... but then each later section goes somewhere completely new and wonderful...
huflpuf 3 years ago
does anyone else think that sounds very alike to Maple Leaf Rag?
millyandbuttons 3 years ago
Yes Joplin used the formula from the Maple Leaf in several rags: The Cascades, Leola, Sugar Cane Rag, and Gladiolus Rag all use the same model.
Doug19752533 3 years ago
They do, and it's because they're in the same key. Sometimes I mix up the two, and play the A section of Maple Leaf, followed by the B section of Gladioulus.
jeffxl 3 years ago
I'm sorry - I have to disagree here ...unfortunately I first listend to 90% of Joplin's music via Joshua Rifkin...and if you listen to Rifkin's perfection - it ruins all other versions. My good man - you don't emphasize the subtleties that need emphasizing - and you just bang your way through it. Those who mention Rifkin really should emulate his emotion brought to Joplin's masterpieces.
anonyms404 3 years ago
Sorry to disappoint. I've played with more rubato and sensitivity at times-- each time is influenced by what the mood is at the moment. (This was, I think, right after recording the ML, so that was that mood) Do you have a vid somewhere?
huflpuf 3 years ago
omg I love this rag that was a job well done! I really want to learn it now I'm sorry to say this, but I'm another person now you made want to play this :p
FREEASTHESTARS 3 years ago
also at around 2:40 you speed up just a tad, it could be because it's your favorite part and you get excited but keep the tempo nice and steady like it was before:)
x0jeannieloveexx 3 years ago
this tempo is perfect. you do a spectacular job of making the right hand sing, especially when going up high, meanwhile making the left hand nice and strong but not too overpowering and drowning out the right hand. however i think you can even bring the left hand down even more and bring the right hand out more. sounds great!! you made me want to learn this piece, before seeing your video i never even heard of the gladiolus rag, now i can't wait to learn it!!
x0jeannieloveexx 3 years ago
Gee, thanks for the in depth details. :) I'm delighted that yet another person now wants to learn it... yay! :D This is too cool. Enjoy!
huflpuf 3 years ago
Great Job! You play really well! I would give it a 5/5!
noodlecrazeet 3 years ago
I'm glad everyone's enjoying this so- thanks!
huflpuf 3 years ago
I'm glad everyone's enjoying this so- thanks!
huflpuf 3 years ago
superb performance :) what a pity the Audio is terrible.......
unabanger 3 years ago
Gosh thanks. Sorry, I just stuck a digital camera on the couch and left it running... <:\
huflpuf 3 years ago
wonderful job hflpuf! keep playing, you have an awesome gift, and obviously aren;t afraid to work hard to perfect your art...fight the good fight! ~a grfndor
nepenthenicole 3 years ago
Gosh, thanks, that's encouraging (particularly to someone who is busy with work and doesn't practice often nowadays. Thanks, grfndor! >;)
huflpuf 3 years ago
Superb!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
westfield90 3 years ago
Thanks! Comments like this reminded me to play today and keep in shape... :)
huflpuf 3 years ago
dude are you scott himself or what, u play so good i cant just belive it. i get stuck when i try this al the time :)
Shiro322 3 years ago
Why thank you. It's really heartening after playing for hours alone at age thirteen and unable to tell the composer that I loved his works, and now having people enjoy it. Well, keep plugging away slowly and eventually your brain will build the proper pathways to manage it. Good luck!
huflpuf 3 years ago
You can't completely disable the ratings. 5 stars.
*****
rotunda57 4 years ago 2
<:}
huflpuf 4 years ago
Me too I'm a Scott Joplin's fan. You played it just (almost) like how I heard from the cd I have, where Joplin himself was playing!
catafalgico 4 years ago 3
Wow. That makes me happy.
huflpuf 4 years ago
Play it like Gluck!
mzltv 4 years ago
I like the way you play this. It's one of my favorite's by Joplin. Maple Leaf Rag is another favorite (and yes, to earlier poster, the two songs do sound somewhat alike. Ragtime, especially when written by same composer, does tend to do that.)
riley501111 4 years ago
Thanks! It's nice to see so many people listening to something I learned long ago with no audience.
huflpuf 4 years ago
Cool, but in some way it sounds a little laik maple leaf rag still good!:)
Shiro322 4 years ago
You play it very well!
theragtimefan 4 years ago
:( all rags from scott joplin sound very similiar to eachother
Onigos2 4 years ago
No ! No ! No !!! the contrary is true !!!
tgirlmegaly 4 years ago
Danke! :)
huflpuf 4 years ago
Some of them are indeed isomorphic and almost insipid, but his later works show some progress. Some of them aren't played or found often because the copyrights keeps them out of anthologies.
huflpuf 4 years ago
Well you think it is because I will bet you don't play it. But if you play ragtime you eventually realize they sound very different! I used to think the same thing until i started playing it.
theragtimefan 4 years ago
well i play piano and there are some sound paterns which are similiar
Onigos2 4 years ago
Superb. I could listen to this music for hours. B
cuthbertdrinkwater 4 years ago
Ditto!!!
theragtimefan 4 years ago
Scott Joplin -- Great America composer (period)!!!
lavampire 4 years ago
Joplin didn't write "jazz" music as you've tagged it, he saw himself as Classical composer...just to point that out. You should play it a bit slower with a bit of rubato, it really makes all the difference.
TheRagtimePrince 4 years ago
True. (But 'jazz' on a tag brings in viewers doing time travel. >;-) I'm glad you said this, because I used to really overdo the rubato once upon a time, having come into ragtime after playing a lot of exaggerrated rubato on Chopin... I have to fight not to do that too much. Well, will try another round soon...
huflpuf 4 years ago
You are right, he's closer to Chopin and Liszt than jazz. Of course there is the influence of marching band music as well.
MANFROMMARS46 4 years ago
Yes! I could play the third section forever, especially from the part going into its replay. It sounds so complex with those harmonies you note-- I was amazed that a lot of it was just from the thumb notes.
huflpuf 4 years ago
Yeah, this is a unique piece, the harmonies in the third section are beautiful and original.
salexlindsay 4 years ago
cool!!
nicolejustin 4 years ago
Terrific! Thanks for posting!
machaeroguy 4 years ago
very good sounds similar to maple leaf rag
brad1567 4 years ago
nice... gave me a few ideas about how I can play this song better... thanks!
andykoehler 5 years ago
Beautiful! I've been trying to decide which Joplin piece to tackle next, and even though I've heard recordings of Gladiolus many times, your rendition may have inspired me to learn it. Thanks for a really nice performance.
ouirv 5 years ago
Aw, you made my day!! (or longer.) I am so glad to share.
huflpuf 4 years ago
steinways sure do have a beautiful tone.
ugnex3 5 years ago
Excellent playing
latibes 5 years ago
Oh, thank YOU! I've been playing this piece since age 13 and usually had nobody around to enjoy it. >:)
huflpuf 5 years ago
Very nice. Thank you.
leoseries 5 years ago