Theoretically, if you find an animal that was clean and one that was unclean (biblically speaking) you should be able to establish to a creationist's satisfaction that they are different kinds. So if you track the common ancestor of pigs and sheep convincingly, then they will be forced to move to plan B. Deny the evidence. Actually that's plan A for them as well.
Have you seen Dr.Berlinski on whale evolution BTW. A great example of the metre vs mile argument.
true. and besides, Scientology, the "religion" that was founded by a Sci-Fi writer, got followers, so why shouldn't a "religion" based on a Sci-Fi television series not get followers?
After looking at a bunch of your vids I've decided to worship Dr.Manhattan.After all we are all of living in the shadow of Manhattan. :D p.s.: Alan Moore is a better writer than the assmonkeys who wrote these holy books.
I thought the whole purpose to Creationists accepting "micro" evolution was the impossibility of every existing species being on the ark? They needed to reduce the numbers of original organisms by accepting the possibility of "parent kinds". But by rigidly defining "kinds" as having reproductive compatibility, they're still dealing with the vast majority of all organisms which still wouldn't fit on the ark. Science nails their feet to the floor once again.
And the offspring must be viable. That is the offspring must not degrade over generations such that several generations later they still can reproduce and survive.
The singular of species is species, not specie! The word specie means money.
SLRL1A1 2 years ago
Macroevolution is complete speciation, creationists did not create that term. ):
But yes, creationists are idiots when they try to create their own definitions.
HAL9000unit 2 years ago
Theoretically, if you find an animal that was clean and one that was unclean (biblically speaking) you should be able to establish to a creationist's satisfaction that they are different kinds. So if you track the common ancestor of pigs and sheep convincingly, then they will be forced to move to plan B. Deny the evidence. Actually that's plan A for them as well.
Have you seen Dr.Berlinski on whale evolution BTW. A great example of the metre vs mile argument.
conradleviston 2 years ago
wow, the border of creation wiki looks oddly like a stargate...
does this mean "God" was actually an ancient race of aliens that made highly advanced technology who "ascended" into a higher plain of reality?
sithmonkeygecko 2 years ago
Makes more sense than Genesis.
dechha1981 2 years ago
true. and besides, Scientology, the "religion" that was founded by a Sci-Fi writer, got followers, so why shouldn't a "religion" based on a Sci-Fi television series not get followers?
sithmonkeygecko 2 years ago
After looking at a bunch of your vids I've decided to worship Dr.Manhattan.After all we are all of living in the shadow of Manhattan. :D p.s.: Alan Moore is a better writer than the assmonkeys who wrote these holy books.
harkying99 2 years ago
That was what I thought too xD. But Jehova seems more to fit the description of the Ori rather than the Ancients.
Juel92 2 years ago
Another good video. Any video with a Jack Chick strip is automatically awesome.
Also, it's spelled B-R-A-D-Y.
kissfan7 2 years ago
Another great video/series!
TooMuchButtHair 2 years ago
Forgot the link in the description.
WeedGreenPowerRanger 2 years ago
Robot voice annoying. slash slash greater than....
but still great video.
xtcx2e 2 years ago
"Kind" usually means "family" to them, because you'll hear them say things like "KINDS of dogs" and "KINDS of fish".
poorkinghaggard 2 years ago
If I were a judge, I'd be far too busy being delicious.
TheCeejPlus 2 years ago
I thought the whole purpose to Creationists accepting "micro" evolution was the impossibility of every existing species being on the ark? They needed to reduce the numbers of original organisms by accepting the possibility of "parent kinds". But by rigidly defining "kinds" as having reproductive compatibility, they're still dealing with the vast majority of all organisms which still wouldn't fit on the ark. Science nails their feet to the floor once again.
AbbeyNormal 2 years ago
Kinds? Kind? I'll be very kind to creationists.. with a slegdehammer heheh nah.. Im a peaceful man.. so I'll constrict myself to using words..
Vogter2100 2 years ago
We've Heard it all Before: Redux
We've Heard it all Before: Reloaded
We've Heard it all Before: In The other Ear
We've Heard it all Before: Can you Hear me Now?
RyuDarragh 2 years ago
We've Heard It All before: Electric Boogaloo
GoblinXXX 2 years ago
We've Heard it all Before: Before. Before. Before..
RyuDarragh 2 years ago
A few more title suggestions
Last We've Heard It Already on the left
We've Heard it Already the Conqueror
The We've Heard It Already that Stole Christmas
Zack and Miri Make a We've Heard it Already Porno
pakratmak 2 years ago
Return of We've Heard it Already
Danmill23 2 years ago
Bride of We've Heard It Before
GoblinXXX 2 years ago
We've Heard It Already: The Wrath of Khan
Nick and Norah's Infinite We've Heard It Already
jussts 2 years ago
We've Heard It Already: A New Hope
GoblinXXX 2 years ago
Great video!
As for classifications re species, it's hard since it's gradual. Where exactly do we draw the line...
I miss Neospeak Paul!
Atheistblindchick 2 years ago
Typically, it's whether or not they can produce fertile offspring.
dechha1981 2 years ago
And the offspring must be viable. That is the offspring must not degrade over generations such that several generations later they still can reproduce and survive.
Zoiros85 2 years ago
You always pick the best pictures, don't you?
JohnTraviss 2 years ago
I have an idea:
The Texas We've Heard It Already Massacre
JohnTraviss 2 years ago
Micro evolution = a few generations
Macro evolution = a few generations more
unperceptive 2 years ago
in other words it's all evolution. It's just time scale. If you accept one you have to accept the other. It's evolution, period.
Thunderf00t explained this in this video.
watch?v=lmUGJ3Jh7fc
unperceptive 2 years ago