Added: 1 year ago
From: emptywithoutjesus
Views: 176
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hey Empty, have you noticed less and less people watch your videos as time goes on? I'm going to take a guess and say it's because you have no intention of engaging in a discussion, you just want to preach AT people.

    You don't listen, you're condescending while trying to come off as polite and caring. You are proud of your ignorance, and you plead with others to be as ignorant as you.

    I feel kind of sad for you...

  • @maverik713 That's nice. Please tell me, WHERE did your sad feelings come from? I mean, WHERE did they originate from? Scientifically speaking of course.

  • @emptywithoutjesus

    Even if I couldn't tell you where feelings come from(and I can, but I'm done wasting time explaining things to people who have no intention of learning anything new) that wouldn't make your "explanation" valid. I put explanation in quotes because your version will most likely consist of something that you can't prove to others.

    Way to dodge the rest of my comment though.

    Again, I feel sad for you.

  • @maverik713 "Way to dodge the rest of my comment though" My thoughts exactly. Where did they come from?

  • @emptywithoutjesus Okay, let me try to this again, maybe if I explain it a different way you might get it this time.

    My first comment consisted of a question and four statements.

    To which you said "That's nice." before moving on to ask your own questions.

    Now why do you think it's okay to only respond with "That's nice." to me but the paragraph I made in response to you was dodging? You see why I don't want to have a conversation with you? You're dishonest in the way you argue.

  • @maverik713 "Hey Empty, have you noticed less and less people watch your videos as time goes on?"

    No, I haven't. Do you have charts and graphs at home depicting the decline of viewership?

    I don't even KNOW how many videos I have, that's how little it matters to me. I speak to those people God wants me to. You on the other hand never made that video you said you would and you keep on coping out with "you'll never listen anyway", nonsense. Face it mav, you're afraid to make the video.

  • @emptywithoutjesus Tee hee, it's cute that you think you have me afraid to make a video. And while you are certainly welcome to believe fear is what prevents me from making any more videos to or about you, I know it's not the truth. I rewatched my "EWJvid" and immediately remembered why I didn't want to engage you anymore. You're dishonest, disingenuous, and not interested in having a real conversation. You just wanna preach at people and make fun of stuff you don't understand. Have fun!

  • @maverik713 Cop out, ca ca cop out.

  • I can justify killing someone if their existence puts my own life in danger.

  • I sorry but I don't believe in a god or gods, because I see no proof in a divine creator and no matter how many time bible passages get thrown at me.

    It's all just "blah, blah, blah" to me...!

  • You should look up Immanuel Kant. People may take the reference a little more seriously than Lewis.- And also, you may wish to discontinue generalising, 0:38 "...kind of like yourselves, atheists." I don't look down on many people, regardless of their ascribed faith... Not that I take offence to YOU doing it. But if you wish to communicate to atheists effectively you may find it more effective to not condescend them or assume their values and/or behaviour. -Be well in all things.

  • @PrecambrianLullabyI appreciate the feedback. One of my faults on my videos is speaking to the atheists that visit my channel as opposed to ALL atheists. When I talk to atheists on my videos I know in my mind that I am talking to a sub group of devout atheists that defend their faith with grit. It's my fault. I probably should say something to the effect of "not all atheists", but I usually forget being caught up in the topic.

  • The fault is not yours alone, many on the non-believer side are equally guilty; People talk about Christians in very repulsive ways and my knee jerks. I've known many Christians in my day, very few of them are guilty of the ignorance and behaviour they are often prescribed by some here online. It certainly does grab attention. That just seems to be the climate here... I, personally, abstain the debate. IMO, There are those that benefit much from faith. Best of luck, and TY 4 the kind reply.

  • What utter nonsense, morality is derived from evolution and necessary for a species to survive.

    If God is the source of morality then you should be able to name one universe moral law? FYI you may want to check you bible for examples of immorality.

  • White noise, nothing but white noise. YOU look down on us AND "pagans". Don't you believe your Jesus had something to say about hypocrisy? Thousands of years of trial & error is how we've come to the morals we have today, just like you Christians figured out about slavery, women's rights & democracy, not from your book. I see no proof of the immaterial & you're real bad at giving any.

    Are you saying if you stopped being a Christian tomorrow you'd just go out raping & killing? Answer this.

  • @CaffeinatedThinking OK. You mention they develop over time. HOW did they get started? You know, what sparked the very first moral? Like what sparked the very first chemicals to create something?

  • Comment removed

  • @emptywithoutjesus "HOW did they get started?"

    Because there are consequences to moral behavior that benefit reproduction. The HOW of it all is simply that the effect of certain genes(and before genes - other arrangements of matter) happened to selectively reduce predatory behavior towards replicators that were likely to contain the same gene, which in turn gave such genes a reproductive advantage. A similar process irons out the details of cultural moral codes in societies.

  • I do like biblical commentary, but this strayed from the premise. You left reason once you said law requires a lawgiver. Moral law is the animal reaction to consequence. If there is a God, He informs us of the law as it exists. If He decided what was wrong, then it's not law, just His opinion. If we learn it by reason or revelation, there still is a best way to do anything.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more