Added: 3 years ago
From: notebooks
Views: 38,012
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (107)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • No..

  • can you play mw3 on a net book

  • Full premium experience? FPS is lower than 30 most of the time and the graphics are set to low...

  • LINK666.4

  • @KusHDivine how to fix it

  • which acer aspire gamet00b?

  • my sony vaio can play this quite easily...maxed out, 1920x1080, full anti alising, never goes below 25 fps...4 g ram, 2nd gen i5, ati radeon hd 5650....1000 bucks....

  • I built my brothers 350$ desktop runs dirt 2 on max 30+ fps :D

  • @InstandLP

    Fascinating that, more than ever, the current definition of netbook is still primarily about it being in the $300.00 range.

  • my acer aspire can run this playble easily

    ati mobility radeon 4250 =p

    £300

  • my acer aspire can run this playble easily

    ati mobility radeon 4250 =p

  • The Asus EEE PC 1215N can run this playable and its around $450-500.

  • oh yeah i can play my netbook with games!!!

  • "Same full premium experience that you would expect with GeForce."

    Sure makes me glad I'm ATI! 30fps my arse!

  • YAY! NIVIDIA!!

  • THE ION CAN PLAY COD 4 PLAYABLY TECHNICALLY AT ABOUT 15-030 FPS this is considered playable in my opinion but not necessarily the best experienes. However for a netbook for users on the go this is great

  • how do u get cod 4 for it

  • playable? playable my ass.

  • is it windows xp playable?

  • @2009DewTour Yes, all of the games made today are XP compatible.

  • @BeconMovies and if there xp compatible it means there 98 compatible lol i use win 7 for men

  • why 350$ if u can buy an 45 Euro used pc lol

  • Can someone help i want a CHEAP netbook that can run call of duty world at war. Help me and ill subscribe :D

  • This was uploaded on my birthday!!!

  • this is actually a very awesome game i cannot believe it. it is much greater than mw1. i have only just attained the second prestige ! i'm as a result happy. got the game only a couple weeks ago out of mw2forfreeYinfo (replace Y with . ) but i am undoubtedly annihilating most people!

  • Intel graphic 950 sucks! i mean it! Can't even encode a wmv video at 720p otherwise it laggssssssssss plan useless! INTEL MUST stop making graphics cards! My friend gave me a game Midtown Madness 2 released 1999 and its runs it at 21fps, some areas 11fps HOW MISSLEADING! GMA 950 run 2006 vs a low requirement game (as a pc of 1999).

  • Intel Graphics suk big time! Nvidia is incredible!

  • go fuck your self,who the fuck will buy a netbook to play games,and you compare it with the intel one,you prick from nvidia,intel video cipsets are for busines not for gaming

  • @ndragos87 No one will buy it specifically for gaming, but it would be a nice bonus for a traveling gamer. And that's the point, that intel chipsets are designed for business and not gaming, and this is, so it's showing that off.

  • and oh it also runs mw2 pretty good (at 1280-720 the rest standard)

  • LOL u can se that when he goes outside it goes from 25-30fps to 10-15 fps. Amazing for a netbook but not really FPS as i would want to play

  • @jenesiscassidy503590 your wrecking the gaming industry downloading cracked games. you should be supporting them by buying the game. not ripping them off. suppose this is the way of the world now and no one gives a fuck.

  • but me i can paly it in my acer aspire one netbook 1gb ram 160 hard disk intel atom 1.60ghz

  • that looks like its getting a decent fps as well if anyone could tell me the proper framerate i would be happy

  • if i had an ion netbook i might install a game like this, but only with bare minimum settings prob. I would most likely get older but still fun games like halo 1 or halo 2. In fact i have an acer aspire one (stereotypical netbook on the left) and made the mistake of downloading cod4. It took 27 hours and doesn't play at all. I also installed halo 1 and it plays but with low frame rates regardless of the settings.

  • looks like the game is getting alot less than 30 FPS

  • Well, He's right, i had the exact error! I bet theres a way to get around it. The only thing thats different is the names, Logically there to graphics chips are the same.

  • I love how badly he's trying to sell it.

  • also that's DEFINITELY not playable for me.

    but i'd like to see where they go with this. i'm thinking, handheld game system :D

  • too much slow for comfort gaming. atom process is limiting factor with any netbook

    external video cards are way better :)

  • I do not know why, but with my Asus 1201n that has 2gb of ram, nvidia ion and a dual-core 1.6ghz atom, i can get this game at 40fps at everything low except the resolution at native and I can get it very playable on singleplayer at medium settings with model details maxed and textures at normal. The game plays great and looks great at the same time for me, the video looks nothing similar to what i experienced.

  • You lucky with your Asus 1201n. I still can't buy this model in our country :(. Dual core atom rules. I can buy only netbooks with weak n270 + ION :(

    Cod4 probably is cpu-dependable game...

  • when i get a laptop i wnt to play crysis on it!

  • lawl

    good luck

  • Cool :) - My netbook got 7.5fps xD

  • @AshMargrove luckkyyyy! haha

  • @Alvinkujur711 you could get one, for 4x price, and 20% battery time

  • NVidia FTW!

  • Still, it is near impossible to tell how low the settings really are.

    Actual hardware review sites posted rather low fps (though on a smaller netbook screen, it will be faster).

  • the next step would be integrating ion with the ultra slim netbooks

  • actually for the price of a netbook like HP mini 311 @ $400 you get the same netbook functions plus the capability of the Nvidia ION, This is a big leap and probably another cornerstone for the netbook community.

  • And you can get an Ion-based Acer desktop for $199. I definitely like what hardware manufacturers are doing in the ultra-light market space.

  • eeehh... i'm not impressed. thats the smallest map in the game and it cannot handle it well.

    mabye once I can get an ion netbook for under 300$ i would consider upgrading.

  • That is the nvidia that I know.

  • The point of itx PC are for special usage, such as HTPC, not gaming.

    The fact it can game, however, is just showing off it's power.

  • @jeremyshaw1 I still use mine as a gaming system regardless. I just like the Atom & ION based technology and the low power consumption. I don't really want some 700-900 watt sucking beast in my room. I only play casually on the PC and like older SOURCE games and the REVO series (Nettop) plays them just fine.

  • This is pretty interesting I bet Counter strike source and half life would run decently! Would be pretty fun for some lan sessions

  • holy crap now this is awsome (when i saw the pc i tought it was a video card o.o

  • wtf? u buy an netbook for play games or for use the internet and the word? wtf this is lame....

  • yeah this video looks choppy but I still wouldn't buy a netbook for a while until this comes out. It will most likely help big time.

  • dude, they refuse to tell the settings in cod4

  • They chose this level because it's almost imossible to tell how low the settings are due to the constant smoke/lightening/rain/darkness­.

    Charlie Don't Surf might of been a better demo level

  • Weather effects like lightning and rain are MORE graphically intensive than an indoors hallways or something of that nature. Almost 30fps on what seems to be maxed out settings isn't bad.

  • my friend has the ion, he cud barely run the game in the middle of the game where things get intense..er? either way this platform is more for hte 1080p hdmi feature and not for gaming at all. he is just proving that it does infact have to power to run the games.

  • @jeremyshaw1

    But even if they were at the minimum that still really good 4 something that could fit in a netbook

  • Dude they have notebooks with like, an overclocked 9600 GT, and even a 9800 :/

  • the difference is that its a lot smaller and it takes a lot less power

  • Putting this kind of GPU in a netbook seems to defeat the netbook concept somehow.

  • How so? It still consumes very little power. I don't understand why this would defeat the concept of a netbook. If anything it would increase the amount of things you can do on a netbook.

  • Try reading up on netbooks and figure it out yourself.

  • whatever man...

  • Fine, i guess i'll cite an example. The EEEPC 1000H Costs around $400.00 They're coming out with an EEE 1000H + Optical drive, the EEEPC 1004DN. The cost? $530-590. That's just an ODD upgrade and it's already within the price range of a full size dualcore laptop.

  • The point of a net book isn't about price. It's about size and portability. My netbook was $740. It just has more features than most other ones. But it's still a tiny netbook.

  • That's a notebook.

    A netbook is something that's cheap enough that you won't mind losing. That's the definition reviewers generally came out with when netbooks came out and it's what differentiates it from the notebook.

  • The definition reviewers came out with? a netbook isn't about price that's absurd. A netbook is about portable computing that surpasses the traditional notebook/laptop configurations. It's about sliding a 2-3pd chassis into your backpack and saying forget about it.

  • Would you be willing to buy a $700 netbook and treat it as casually as a regular $350 netbook?

  • @ClannerA01

    It costs 400$ not 700$

  • @pufixas

    Not here. At the moment the nVidia based netbooks cost Approx $711.00. Maybe the N10 since it's really old by now.

    I currently have an AMD's netbook which is the cheapest game capable netbook out here (I bought it because of the CPU tho) and this one cost $533.00

  • That's not being "casual". Thats reaping the benefits of a 3pd netbook. And once again you keep pointing to price and are completely missing the point. Allow me to reiterate a netbook is based on small form factor itx motherboards arm or atom cpu's integrated solutions. usually having small ssd or standard hdd drives with no optical drives or periphials. Touting portability and "all day computing" a reference to battery life. They can be had for 160-800$ at a quick glance. Educate yourself.

  • Dude. You can get a notebook for $800. Overdesigned and overpriced is not what a netbook is.

  • What are you talking about "dude" perhaps you should read my description of a netbook again, seeing as how you pretty much just said what I did 3 days ago.

  • Mini12 = $999.00

    Overengineered and overpriced, the opposite of what a netbook was originally designed for.

  • Guy, you are totally changing the topic of this conversation. This has nothing to do with the mini nor does it have anything to do with pricing. I'm beginning to think you are on drugs, can you possibly just follow the topic'.'?

  • Dude... it sucked. Mini 12 wasn't even as powerful as the Surf 2G (the first ever netbook).

    At least I can say the gma 950 whoops the gma 500 by a fair margin... unified shaders (theoretical... and even so, clock speed is too low) and all.

  • I think, he has a good point.

    The formfactor is not the difference - as there have been subnotebooks - and there are notebooks available as thin, small and light as so called 'netbooks'.

    Another criteria might be the mostly computed tasks. To surf webpages and checking email was originally the task, first netbooks were offered for.

    This was reflected in pricing.

  • the cpu is a single core!!!

  • i know, whats up with the atom processor? what does it have good that its better than the celeron?

  • Two threads in stead of one perhaps? Or does celeron have that too? Also, I think the nice thing about the Atom is primarily the low amount of heat it produces and low energy usage. That makes for great battery life... So. I think the Battery life is your answer.

  • ooh well, i guess the Atom bottlenecks the Nvidia GPU.

  • lol its dosnt

    the duel core atom has 4 threads

  • @CRAKIZGOOD but it's not really good for netbooks, the TDP is double of the single core, and not even has SpeedStep, so it makes the battery life 2-4x less.

  • @Xmisterhu

    yeah i know

  • no... maybe a little bit but the GPU just sucks to be honest..

  • Nope, it's extremely good for an integrated chip

  • yeah but the gpu sucks.. in general but its a good chip cause its integrated..

  • How does it suck? It's the best integrated GPU out there

  • because it sucks -_- you fucking moron.. so what if its integrated.. who the hell would play cod4 on a netbook.. seriously theres a reason its called netbook.. but i do like the ION platform its a good integrated CHIP but dedicated graphics card is better noob

  • No, i'm not a moron, it's the best Integrated chip ever made. You're just comparing it to discrete cards, which cost significantly more. Stupid cunt

  • do you even know how much this is going to cost you dumb faggot retard? so what if its the best integrated chip ever made.. what kind of retard wants an integrated chip.. i want the best GPU not the best of the crappiest .. you stupid retard

  • It's a netbook, it' would cost too much for a really good GPU in a netbook, which defeats the purpose of netbooks.

    Who looks stupid now

  • About $190 for the Zotac IONITX-A-U.

    Dual core atom, Integrated WiFi and On board PSU.

    On a mini-ITX mobo.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more