You look as if you might be an expert in ancient stone age tools. If you don't mind taking a look at something I found here in North Carolina. I've had several people tell me it looks like a stone age dagger of sorts from the paleolethic time frame. Let me know what you think:
If you could search 'Artifact found while prospecting' video here on Youtube you will see it. My handle is rocket1222. Thank you in advance for letting me know what you think.
When you are sitting on the table. with the skulls lined up to your right... the "brown" skull (the second one in the line)... which "family" does that skull belong to?
@5tonyvvvv there are plenty of (christian) scientists out there who accept evolution as fact... francis collins for instance.. you know, he was the leader of a little thing called the HUMAN GENOME PROJECT.. he also wrote a book. i think he knows a bit more about homochirality than you do.
@5tonyvvvv The great thing about reality is it does not matter if you accept it our not. And evolution is reality. Your creationist religious dogma does not change that. You can choose to live in delusion and ignore aspects of science that disagree with the myths of bronze age tribesmen you believe, but at least be consistent. If science is bs get off your computer, leave your home, walk to work, don't use medicine...because all those things come from science.
@brockunc Evolution is not reality, its assumptions!, and pharmaceutical drugs Don't cure anything, I was Indoctrinated to believe that evolution was Fact, The truth is INFORMATION and Code found in cell's and DNA, and Amino acids never organize themselves, That takes Intelligence Could your computer program it self with all its INFORMATION, NEVER!!..Have a great day, and God bless!
@5tonyvvvv Once again your ignorance does not change the facts. Evolution is a fact and you asserting it is not does not change anything. You can say gravity is fake but it you'll still die if you jump off a building. The only thing you were indoctrinated to believe is nonsense creationist propaganda based on the myths of a bunch of uninformed cavemen.
And until computers start having babies your argument is idiotic. Not to mention we've all seen people make computers.
@brockunc Gravity is testable repeatable and observable!. show me amino acids organizing themselves into perfect Digital code to form one single protein!. A single cell is more complex than any computer built by man, people can make computers correct, and it takes intelligence to do so! and INFORMATION!! tons of INFORMATION!!, You have a Blessed day. Lose your anger!
@5tonyvvvv Evolution meets all the criteria. It is independently verified by multiple fields of science. Everything from geology (fossil record), to genetics (DNA), to medicine (bacterial evolution) and many more. Every new technique we discover confirms common decent.
As for anger I see the pot calling the kettle black. Your the troll that responded to a video on stone tools with your religious nonsense.
I don't know how many times I can say stop making patently false assertions. Cont
@brockunc Antony Flew the high priest of atheism realized it takes Intelligence, to have INFORMATION! A single cell could never form or evolve by time and chance..It most certainly would never reproduce it self, Ever!!
@5tonyvvvv Simple stating there is "Zero chance of RNA forming DNA" does not make it so. Your making a claim back it with evidence. I know religion is all about unsupported proclamations but if you want to make a claim you need evidence to back it.
Never heard of antony flew which just shows how idiotic your argument is since clearly there are no high priest of atheism since its not a religion but simply a response to theistic claims. I do find it funny that you use "priest" to insult us.Cont
@brockunc There is ZERO chance of RNA forming on a primordial earth! "This engineered RNA" would break down do to the unstable conditions of it..similar to rats leaving a sinking ship..This artificial RNA..has ZERO chance of further evolving into a living cell.
Activated subunits are used along with templates taken from living sources!!..its not a geochemical relevant reaction.Intelligence created life not time and chance!
@5tonyvvvv Furthermore it underlines a true weakness of religious thinking. That you respond to arguments from authority rather verifying evidence. It does not matter who makes the claim it needs to be tested and proved. Saying some guy does not believe something means nothing.
Finally creationism is once giant argument from ignorance. It states you can"t explain something therefor we get to insert whatever unsupported nonsense we want in the gap. Cont.
@5tonyvvvv Even if evolution was false (which its not) you still need evidence to support your claims. The most that could be said is we dont know and any claim put forth needs evidence to back it.
But using your weak argument against you. If complex things need a designer than god (omniscient, omnipresent, all powerful, most complex thing you could imagine) needs a creator. So who created god? If you say he does not need a creator than why should much simpler things like cells need one?
@5tonyvvvv If you choose to live in delusion thats your choose but stop expecting others to believe your bs. Your arguments, like all creationist arguments, are weak. Thats why you keep reciting the same old rubbish over and over again. You need evidence and reasoned argument if you expect anyone with half a brain to respect and listen to you.
Now once again your free to believe in Santa or the easter bunny or whatever you like but stop propagandizing your unsupported nonsense.
@brockunc So you are comparing Santa and they easter bunny to Jesus Christ!!! . WOW.LOL. and who is Ignorant?? OK I have to laugh, You have no Soul either, You will just rot in the ground when you die, you are positive of this!
@5tonyvvvv And stop using played out out idiotic creationist dishonest tactics. I highly doubt you were ever an atheist. According to your religions your lying which is a sin. And if you were, clearly its was for poor reasons as your reasoning skills and idea of proof is laughable. I think the sad empty life is wasting the one life we know we have on nonsense and treating it as a minor step before "heaven". Give me the proof that lead you to Christianity I (still dont believe u were an atheist)!
@brockunc I had the same stubborn atheistic worldview, its a sad empty life. Science supports Intelligence not time and chance, learn Homochirality!!!
@brockunc LOL. Go look it up then, cause you dont know about Antony Flew. makes it not important, ok. lol.. and what do you know?? There are Plenty of PhD Scientists and Chemists that believe in Intelligence!! including Dean Kenyon who worked for NASA! Dr Raymond Damadian inventor of the MRI.Jerry bergman PhD in Chemistry! Hugh Ross PhD in astrophysics..Too many to list!!
@5tonyvvvv "There are Plenty of PhD Scientists and Chemists that believe in Intelligence!". Man your just a handbook a creationist bs.It shows you lack of understanding. When you actually look at that claim none of the scientists actually study the topic in question. Its as relevant as a evolutionary biologist saying he does not believe in black holes. Its not his field of study so he lacks the knowledge to comment on it.None of the objections are for good reasons but rather because of religion
@brockunc Man, you are an atheist Parrot! They have all studied biology and chemistry, So homochirality and DNA , and cellular biology is only for atheist scientists? OK ..lol
@5tonyvvvv "So homochirality and DNA , and cellular biology is only for atheist scientists" No its only for scientists who study that field to comment on. People outside the field of study dont have the evidence and knowledge to comment credibly on it. And you do know its possible to be a theist and still accept evolution? Just read Ken Miller of Frances Collins. They are two respected christian biologist who acknowledge evolution is fact. Educate yourself before commenting anymore
@5tonyvvvv My point is I don't need to know about some random guy you named because atheists dont have priests and I don't care what some crackpot who claimed to be atheist says. I care about evidence and reasoned argument. The thing about science is it does not matter who makes the claim it matters what the evidence is to support it. Your list of scientists perfectly demonstrates my earlier point. People commenting outside their fields because of religious objections is not credible.
@brockunc You are looking for a natural explanation for GOD! we never claim this! God is eternal! There is no such thing as a simple cell. today or in the past, Like I said lets see some testable, observable Chemistry of one single protein forming! from amino acids! Learn Chirality!!
@5tonyvvvv If god is eternal why not simply say the universe is eternal? There is no evidence to suggest it did not always exist in some form. The god "explanation" simply adds one more complex step which is not needed.
My point about cells is that compared to your concept of god they are extremely simple. So if god a more complex thing did not need a designer why should a comparatively simple thing like a cell need one?
@5tonyvvvv "You don't understand astrophysics" Thats a good one because I'm actual a physicist. I am willing to bet my knowledge of physics is far superior to yours. There is nothing that says the universe did not always exist in some form. Your lack of understand of the the implications of the big bang is not my problem.
I've already dismissed your idiotic Flew point multiple times. It has no bearing on the arguments and exposes your weak thinking. Its a a straw man argument from authority.
@brockunc INFORMATION is the nightmare for you People!! Show me Testable, repeatable chemistry, Not Assumptions! That solves Homochirality!! You need to read Signature in the cell, by Stephen c meyer!!
@5tonyvvvv Btw i'm still waiting for the scientific evidence for creationism. Not to mention any of the other fanciful claims of the bible. If you have a testable verifiable theory supported by evidence publish it in a scientific journal. Have every scientist in the field critic it and try and poke holes in it, and test it, and verify your claims. Thats what evolution and all scientific theories are subject to. Then it can be considered science and not nonsense.
@brockunc Your waiting for evidence for creationism? LOL. OK, can you name 1 thing that you know for a fact was not created. Example: Have you ever found a (knife, can, dog, car, bobby pin, house, car, etc.) that wasn't created, that just formed by itself? that wasn't made by someone or something else with design and purpose? The Bible says were made in Gods image, hows that? Were creators and eternity has been placed in our heart. 2 Thess 2:10-12
@5tonyvvvv As for you point about amino acids forming it has been demonstrated many times. Its a relatively simple process. Using basic elements found in abundance on earth all what was needed was a little bit of energy (such as from a lighting strike)
But what you are talking about now is abiogenesis and has nothing to do with evolution. And evolution is true regardless of that.Your lack of knowledge of what evolution actually says is typical. If your going to argue something at least learn it
@5tonyvvvv And I'm still waiting for any proof for creationism that is not in the form of an argument from ignorance. You need positive proof for your claims and saying something is so complicated that I cant understand how it works does not mean you get to insert whatever nonsense you see fit. Its like the Greeks saying "we cant explain lighting therefore it must be Odin throwing bolts down".
@brockunc This coming from someone that doesn't even know who Antony Flew is!!! Educate yourself!! Chirality has not been solved, its all Assumptions!
@5tonyvvvv Anyway Its clear your lack of understanding of the world, science, and evolution is so great that its useless arguing with you. If you were truly interested in the nature of reality you would at least take the time to education yourself on these things. But as you are obviously only interested in parroting creationist handbooks and making straw men arguments and arguments from ignorance this conversation is useless.
@brockunc Abiogenesis and evolution are very much connected...you need life to start in order for it to evolve!!....its nothing more than stubborn logic by evolutionists. If you are talking about the Miller experiment that showed nothing, No Building blocks were made, it lacked INFORMATION!! and Chirality!!
@5tonyvvvv "Abiogenesis and evolution are very much connected...you need life to start in order for it to evolve"
Ignoring the complete lack of explanatory power that god "or the magic man" did it has, evolution is true regardless of abiogenesis. There could be any number of ways life started (even god) but what happened after that remains unaltered. Evolution is a fact regardless of how life got started. The two are completely separate concepts.
@brockunc Racemic Mixtures Can Not be used! Miller failed!! This a fact of Chirality!! If you want to talk what about Craig venter did, that was Copying and Rearranging pre existing Living INFORMATION! using synthesizing machines and Templates, and that's far from undirected natural processes!!
...anyone willing to show me the direction where I'll find how we got from Flint to Metals.
eBritishIdentity 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You look as if you might be an expert in ancient stone age tools. If you don't mind taking a look at something I found here in North Carolina. I've had several people tell me it looks like a stone age dagger of sorts from the paleolethic time frame. Let me know what you think:
If you could search 'Artifact found while prospecting' video here on Youtube you will see it. My handle is rocket1222. Thank you in advance for letting me know what you think.
Rick
rocket1222 1 month ago
This is a great video
osclarkos 1 month ago
love the video man
khijasmith 1 month ago
really informative and interesting
ericajjful 1 month ago
Very Cool!
When you are sitting on the table. with the skulls lined up to your right... the "brown" skull (the second one in the line)... which "family" does that skull belong to?
Thanks :)
Chronix74 8 months ago
Evolution is bullshit..homochirality proves it can never happen..its all assumptions..and only atheist scientists can be right
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
@5tonyvvvv there are plenty of (christian) scientists out there who accept evolution as fact... francis collins for instance.. you know, he was the leader of a little thing called the HUMAN GENOME PROJECT.. he also wrote a book. i think he knows a bit more about homochirality than you do.
Frandy878 1 year ago
@Frandy878 There are limits when it comes to genomes. and there PhD scientists that dont except evolution at all.
5tonyvvvv 10 months ago
@5tonyvvvv The great thing about reality is it does not matter if you accept it our not. And evolution is reality. Your creationist religious dogma does not change that. You can choose to live in delusion and ignore aspects of science that disagree with the myths of bronze age tribesmen you believe, but at least be consistent. If science is bs get off your computer, leave your home, walk to work, don't use medicine...because all those things come from science.
brockunc 8 months ago
@brockunc Evolution is not reality, its assumptions!, and pharmaceutical drugs Don't cure anything, I was Indoctrinated to believe that evolution was Fact, The truth is INFORMATION and Code found in cell's and DNA, and Amino acids never organize themselves, That takes Intelligence Could your computer program it self with all its INFORMATION, NEVER!!..Have a great day, and God bless!
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv Once again your ignorance does not change the facts. Evolution is a fact and you asserting it is not does not change anything. You can say gravity is fake but it you'll still die if you jump off a building. The only thing you were indoctrinated to believe is nonsense creationist propaganda based on the myths of a bunch of uninformed cavemen.
And until computers start having babies your argument is idiotic. Not to mention we've all seen people make computers.
brockunc 8 months ago
@brockunc Gravity is testable repeatable and observable!. show me amino acids organizing themselves into perfect Digital code to form one single protein!. A single cell is more complex than any computer built by man, people can make computers correct, and it takes intelligence to do so! and INFORMATION!! tons of INFORMATION!!, You have a Blessed day. Lose your anger!
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv Evolution meets all the criteria. It is independently verified by multiple fields of science. Everything from geology (fossil record), to genetics (DNA), to medicine (bacterial evolution) and many more. Every new technique we discover confirms common decent.
As for anger I see the pot calling the kettle black. Your the troll that responded to a video on stone tools with your religious nonsense.
I don't know how many times I can say stop making patently false assertions. Cont
brockunc 8 months ago
@brockunc Antony Flew the high priest of atheism realized it takes Intelligence, to have INFORMATION! A single cell could never form or evolve by time and chance..It most certainly would never reproduce it self, Ever!!
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv Simple stating there is "Zero chance of RNA forming DNA" does not make it so. Your making a claim back it with evidence. I know religion is all about unsupported proclamations but if you want to make a claim you need evidence to back it.
Never heard of antony flew which just shows how idiotic your argument is since clearly there are no high priest of atheism since its not a religion but simply a response to theistic claims. I do find it funny that you use "priest" to insult us.Cont
brockunc 8 months ago
@brockunc There is ZERO chance of RNA forming on a primordial earth! "This engineered RNA" would break down do to the unstable conditions of it..similar to rats leaving a sinking ship..This artificial RNA..has ZERO chance of further evolving into a living cell.
Activated subunits are used along with templates taken from living sources!!..its not a geochemical relevant reaction.Intelligence created life not time and chance!
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv Furthermore it underlines a true weakness of religious thinking. That you respond to arguments from authority rather verifying evidence. It does not matter who makes the claim it needs to be tested and proved. Saying some guy does not believe something means nothing.
Finally creationism is once giant argument from ignorance. It states you can"t explain something therefor we get to insert whatever unsupported nonsense we want in the gap. Cont.
brockunc 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv Even if evolution was false (which its not) you still need evidence to support your claims. The most that could be said is we dont know and any claim put forth needs evidence to back it.
But using your weak argument against you. If complex things need a designer than god (omniscient, omnipresent, all powerful, most complex thing you could imagine) needs a creator. So who created god? If you say he does not need a creator than why should much simpler things like cells need one?
brockunc 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv If you choose to live in delusion thats your choose but stop expecting others to believe your bs. Your arguments, like all creationist arguments, are weak. Thats why you keep reciting the same old rubbish over and over again. You need evidence and reasoned argument if you expect anyone with half a brain to respect and listen to you.
Now once again your free to believe in Santa or the easter bunny or whatever you like but stop propagandizing your unsupported nonsense.
brockunc 8 months ago
@brockunc So you are comparing Santa and they easter bunny to Jesus Christ!!! . WOW.LOL. and who is Ignorant?? OK I have to laugh, You have no Soul either, You will just rot in the ground when you die, you are positive of this!
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv And stop using played out out idiotic creationist dishonest tactics. I highly doubt you were ever an atheist. According to your religions your lying which is a sin. And if you were, clearly its was for poor reasons as your reasoning skills and idea of proof is laughable. I think the sad empty life is wasting the one life we know we have on nonsense and treating it as a minor step before "heaven". Give me the proof that lead you to Christianity I (still dont believe u were an atheist)!
brockunc 8 months ago
@brockunc I had the same stubborn atheistic worldview, its a sad empty life. Science supports Intelligence not time and chance, learn Homochirality!!!
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago
@brockunc LOL. Go look it up then, cause you dont know about Antony Flew. makes it not important, ok. lol.. and what do you know?? There are Plenty of PhD Scientists and Chemists that believe in Intelligence!! including Dean Kenyon who worked for NASA! Dr Raymond Damadian inventor of the MRI.Jerry bergman PhD in Chemistry! Hugh Ross PhD in astrophysics..Too many to list!!
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv "There are Plenty of PhD Scientists and Chemists that believe in Intelligence!". Man your just a handbook a creationist bs.It shows you lack of understanding. When you actually look at that claim none of the scientists actually study the topic in question. Its as relevant as a evolutionary biologist saying he does not believe in black holes. Its not his field of study so he lacks the knowledge to comment on it.None of the objections are for good reasons but rather because of religion
brockunc 8 months ago
@brockunc Man, you are an atheist Parrot! They have all studied biology and chemistry, So homochirality and DNA , and cellular biology is only for atheist scientists? OK ..lol
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv "So homochirality and DNA , and cellular biology is only for atheist scientists" No its only for scientists who study that field to comment on. People outside the field of study dont have the evidence and knowledge to comment credibly on it. And you do know its possible to be a theist and still accept evolution? Just read Ken Miller of Frances Collins. They are two respected christian biologist who acknowledge evolution is fact. Educate yourself before commenting anymore
brockunc 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv My point is I don't need to know about some random guy you named because atheists dont have priests and I don't care what some crackpot who claimed to be atheist says. I care about evidence and reasoned argument. The thing about science is it does not matter who makes the claim it matters what the evidence is to support it. Your list of scientists perfectly demonstrates my earlier point. People commenting outside their fields because of religious objections is not credible.
brockunc 8 months ago
@brockunc You are looking for a natural explanation for GOD! we never claim this! God is eternal! There is no such thing as a simple cell. today or in the past, Like I said lets see some testable, observable Chemistry of one single protein forming! from amino acids! Learn Chirality!!
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv If god is eternal why not simply say the universe is eternal? There is no evidence to suggest it did not always exist in some form. The god "explanation" simply adds one more complex step which is not needed.
My point about cells is that compared to your concept of god they are extremely simple. So if god a more complex thing did not need a designer why should a comparatively simple thing like a cell need one?
brockunc 8 months ago
@brockunc You don't understand astrophysics, if you think natural matter and the universe is eternal. It must be Super natural then!!
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv "You don't understand astrophysics" Thats a good one because I'm actual a physicist. I am willing to bet my knowledge of physics is far superior to yours. There is nothing that says the universe did not always exist in some form. Your lack of understand of the the implications of the big bang is not my problem.
I've already dismissed your idiotic Flew point multiple times. It has no bearing on the arguments and exposes your weak thinking. Its a a straw man argument from authority.
brockunc 8 months ago
@brockunc INFORMATION is the nightmare for you People!! Show me Testable, repeatable chemistry, Not Assumptions! That solves Homochirality!! You need to read Signature in the cell, by Stephen c meyer!!
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv Btw i'm still waiting for the scientific evidence for creationism. Not to mention any of the other fanciful claims of the bible. If you have a testable verifiable theory supported by evidence publish it in a scientific journal. Have every scientist in the field critic it and try and poke holes in it, and test it, and verify your claims. Thats what evolution and all scientific theories are subject to. Then it can be considered science and not nonsense.
brockunc 8 months ago 2
@brockunc Your waiting for evidence for creationism? LOL. OK, can you name 1 thing that you know for a fact was not created. Example: Have you ever found a (knife, can, dog, car, bobby pin, house, car, etc.) that wasn't created, that just formed by itself? that wasn't made by someone or something else with design and purpose? The Bible says were made in Gods image, hows that? Were creators and eternity has been placed in our heart. 2 Thess 2:10-12
awhitness 5 months ago
@brockunc I like how the other guy thought a quote from the bible disproved your whole argument lmao. Creationists never learn .-.
RothrilSectolith 2 months ago
@5tonyvvvv As for you point about amino acids forming it has been demonstrated many times. Its a relatively simple process. Using basic elements found in abundance on earth all what was needed was a little bit of energy (such as from a lighting strike)
But what you are talking about now is abiogenesis and has nothing to do with evolution. And evolution is true regardless of that.Your lack of knowledge of what evolution actually says is typical. If your going to argue something at least learn it
brockunc 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv And I'm still waiting for any proof for creationism that is not in the form of an argument from ignorance. You need positive proof for your claims and saying something is so complicated that I cant understand how it works does not mean you get to insert whatever nonsense you see fit. Its like the Greeks saying "we cant explain lighting therefore it must be Odin throwing bolts down".
brockunc 8 months ago
@brockunc This coming from someone that doesn't even know who Antony Flew is!!! Educate yourself!! Chirality has not been solved, its all Assumptions!
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv Anyway Its clear your lack of understanding of the world, science, and evolution is so great that its useless arguing with you. If you were truly interested in the nature of reality you would at least take the time to education yourself on these things. But as you are obviously only interested in parroting creationist handbooks and making straw men arguments and arguments from ignorance this conversation is useless.
brockunc 8 months ago
@brockunc Abiogenesis and evolution are very much connected...you need life to start in order for it to evolve!!....its nothing more than stubborn logic by evolutionists. If you are talking about the Miller experiment that showed nothing, No Building blocks were made, it lacked INFORMATION!! and Chirality!!
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@5tonyvvvv "Abiogenesis and evolution are very much connected...you need life to start in order for it to evolve"
Ignoring the complete lack of explanatory power that god "or the magic man" did it has, evolution is true regardless of abiogenesis. There could be any number of ways life started (even god) but what happened after that remains unaltered. Evolution is a fact regardless of how life got started. The two are completely separate concepts.
brockunc 8 months ago
@brockunc Racemic Mixtures Can Not be used! Miller failed!! This a fact of Chirality!! If you want to talk what about Craig venter did, that was Copying and Rearranging pre existing Living INFORMATION! using synthesizing machines and Templates, and that's far from undirected natural processes!!
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago