Science is never settled. Just read that The greenhouse theory goes against the laws of thermodynamics. The atmosphere stops the planet from heating up.
There were NO weapons of mass destruction in Iraq - just as Dr. Hans Blix said; But, the Republican media machine didn't want us to hear that.
And, there is NO dangerous climate change caused by human carbon dioxide - just as the "independent scientists" are now trying to tell us! But, the Democrat media machine doesn't want us to hear that.
We are made to run from one boogieman to the next, as each political party achieves its own agendas for themselves & their money mates.
The LIA may have been attributable to the Dalton or Maunder solar minima.
Looking at the dip between 1400 and 1500, to my eye, there should nothing statistically discernible between the last 150 years and the remainder of the series.
I would like to ask anyone who watches this video, in regards to the graph in the first minute of this video, what you see that is different about the last 150 years as opposed to the previous years covered in the graph?
Yes, but no more so than 200 years ago, or 1200 or 1400 or 1700.
How do you explain the last 2-3 years of cooling? or the steady to lower temps in the 1940s to 1970s while CO2 was rising fastest? Or the warming from the late 1800s until 1940, which was more than present, when CO2 was barely moving at all?
Science is never settled. Just read that The greenhouse theory goes against the laws of thermodynamics. The atmosphere stops the planet from heating up.
david222444 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
.
There were NO weapons of mass destruction in Iraq - just as Dr. Hans Blix said; But, the Republican media machine didn't want us to hear that.
And, there is NO dangerous climate change caused by human carbon dioxide - just as the "independent scientists" are now trying to tell us! But, the Democrat media machine doesn't want us to hear that.
We are made to run from one boogieman to the next, as each political party achieves its own agendas for themselves & their money mates.
BOB CARTER
weallknowitstrue 2 years ago
Allow me to anwer that, Layman jffry.
The last 150 years are recovery from the LIA.
The LIA may have been attributable to the Dalton or Maunder solar minima.
Looking at the dip between 1400 and 1500, to my eye, there should nothing statistically discernible between the last 150 years and the remainder of the series.
gufpott 3 years ago
I would like to ask anyone who watches this video, in regards to the graph in the first minute of this video, what you see that is different about the last 150 years as opposed to the previous years covered in the graph?
jffryfnt 3 years ago
Yes, but no more so than 200 years ago, or 1200 or 1400 or 1700.
How do you explain the last 2-3 years of cooling? or the steady to lower temps in the 1940s to 1970s while CO2 was rising fastest? Or the warming from the late 1800s until 1940, which was more than present, when CO2 was barely moving at all?
Brantoc 2 years ago