I wonder if, with all that is said here about DNA and nanotechnology, we will be incoporating it as part of the human anatomy, i.e., causing our next development in evolution? That probably sounds like nonsense, but what a fascinating thought...
@Tigerblade2002 No it really doesn't sound like non-sense - surely I say, the genetic makeup of human design can be adapted, trancended, perfected and improved. (improved better than God made us) The power is in humanities hands now, if we play God we're just expressing our internal creative abilities which God endowned us with in the first place. Therefore he couldn't possibly blame us, that would be hypocritical.
@12aefv45 I'm christian and I love the idea of scientific breakthroughs, nanotech, galactic exploration etc. I think if God's attributes are to be creative and knowledgeable, since we're his creation, we express many of our innate qualities such as our inquisitive nature to transcend our limits and explore a vast spectrum of possibilities.
@ViceroyOfYahweh My mom, who considers herself a devout christian, is fond of saying, "All will be revealed to us" though she rejects technology of this type daily...I wonder if she realizes how contradictory it is to say that and does what she does...
"And in those days shall men seek death, and shall not find it; and shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them." Rev 9:6 nanotechnology is the begining of something very occular to come.
Nano technology is a racket.The history of nano technology proves the interface-formula that enables nano technology wasn't known until 2005.They stole it and tried to Strawman it by crediting Erick Drexler as "The Father of Nanotechnology" Then began researching the formula and discovering new nano scale facts that were all patented since 1999.Erick Drexler only had a Strawman no formula. Nanotechnology is UFT is it not?If Einstein couldn't solve his own UFT then who did?They never told anyone
I invented a breakthrough energy source which violates the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of energy conservation (and also experimental evidence of such phenomena). Making a 6 kW generator will cost $1200, value of the energy produced yearly $5400, zero operating costs. I am looking for $300 000 for a prototype and for $3M for patents.
Besides, I have studied his so called 'nano gears' in the first 'gear' slide. Its not nano scale, its called a MEM'S (which is micro scale not nano). micro is 1000x larger than nano...
It's always good to hear about this tech but your video production quality needs a little work. You were cut off at the end when I wanted to hear more. No offense intended.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
it is better to control what's already in the body to fight diseases, nano tech could never do what the body can already do, you just have to learn how to control chemicals already in the body.
what about giving concrete and real data instead of starting every sentence with "possibly", "suposingly", "many", "could". It gives allot and no information at once...
Do you suppose we could design a scalar magnetic resistor to affect the size to which we grow in relation to the Earth. Talk about unlimited resources!
love the video man
staranjela 6 days ago
very interesting thanks
grisgrisy 6 days ago
love the video really good
grisgrisy 1 week ago
Deus-ex - Happening right now.
JLakpuri 2 months ago
I wonder if, with all that is said here about DNA and nanotechnology, we will be incoporating it as part of the human anatomy, i.e., causing our next development in evolution? That probably sounds like nonsense, but what a fascinating thought...
Tigerblade2002 2 months ago in playlist progress:nano
@Tigerblade2002 No it really doesn't sound like non-sense - surely I say, the genetic makeup of human design can be adapted, trancended, perfected and improved. (improved better than God made us) The power is in humanities hands now, if we play God we're just expressing our internal creative abilities which God endowned us with in the first place. Therefore he couldn't possibly blame us, that would be hypocritical.
ViceroyOfYahweh 2 months ago
what is it with christians and allways attacking science?
12aefv45 3 months ago
@12aefv45 I'm christian and I love the idea of scientific breakthroughs, nanotech, galactic exploration etc. I think if God's attributes are to be creative and knowledgeable, since we're his creation, we express many of our innate qualities such as our inquisitive nature to transcend our limits and explore a vast spectrum of possibilities.
ViceroyOfYahweh 3 months ago
@ViceroyOfYahweh My mom, who considers herself a devout christian, is fond of saying, "All will be revealed to us" though she rejects technology of this type daily...I wonder if she realizes how contradictory it is to say that and does what she does...
Tigerblade2002 2 months ago in playlist progress:nano
"And in those days shall men seek death, and shall not find it; and shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them." Rev 9:6 nanotechnology is the begining of something very occular to come.
1billion1deaths1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Closely listen to an Inception dvd made before the January 8th Tucson shooting, especially around, "'Do It.'"
jamestargetedindiv 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nano technology is a racket.The history of nano technology proves the interface-formula that enables nano technology wasn't known until 2005.They stole it and tried to Strawman it by crediting Erick Drexler as "The Father of Nanotechnology" Then began researching the formula and discovering new nano scale facts that were all patented since 1999.Erick Drexler only had a Strawman no formula. Nanotechnology is UFT is it not?If Einstein couldn't solve his own UFT then who did?They never told anyone
princeadeshoga 8 months ago
They are so small we can easily breath them in. What will be the consequences of ingesting nano particles?
Wavecurve 11 months ago
Cancer, and then we can take another nanobot to cure that..
kodguerrero 9 months ago
@Wavecurve it could very well be devastating, our immune systems would be defensless
cooladas 9 months ago
where is part 2 of this video series? seta37 has closed their account.
fedism 1 year ago
we need full funding for this.
TheSupremephenom 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I invented a breakthrough energy source which violates the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of energy conservation (and also experimental evidence of such phenomena). Making a 6 kW generator will cost $1200, value of the energy produced yearly $5400, zero operating costs. I am looking for $300 000 for a prototype and for $3M for patents.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
henrykay01 1 year ago
OK, do you actually know anything useful that you can communicate to me? Apart from showing me pictures and saying - You gotta consider the scale.
DaithiDublin 1 year ago
@DaithiDublin
i agree,
Besides, I have studied his so called 'nano gears' in the first 'gear' slide. Its not nano scale, its called a MEM'S (which is micro scale not nano). micro is 1000x larger than nano...
BushyBrows301 1 year ago
What would happen if you make a fractal with nano-tec?
Za7a7aZ 1 year ago
We can use Nano-Technology to miniaturize it (TSAR) to cure AIDS and HIVs or Cancer Cells.
MrVrsilvestrejr2008 1 year ago
@MrVrsilvestrejr2008 HIV doesn't exist this is HOAX. Aids is already nano technology.
wlodzio47 1 year ago
"Not sure what this is, but we will be able to make it eventually". hehe
Mattprole 1 year ago
It's always good to hear about this tech but your video production quality needs a little work. You were cut off at the end when I wanted to hear more. No offense intended.
majormixer 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it is better to control what's already in the body to fight diseases, nano tech could never do what the body can already do, you just have to learn how to control chemicals already in the body.
onthecuttingedge2005 2 years ago
that's not true. research "nanobots"
justinllalor 2 years ago
@justinllalor Actually nanobots are very real and are being used in the medical feild
McDaleyK 1 year ago
Wrong. Every system can be improved apon. Even the biological system of your body has numerous flaws that can be fixed.
NoogLeader 2 years ago
@NoogLeader Yes. Future humans will almost undoubtably have improved digestion/metabolism, and circulatory system.
TheJamesrocket 1 year ago
Clipart from other videos with generic marketing press release blather. Uncreative, unclever, and dull.
Matrix29bear 2 years ago
What scale and what size. How big are they?
txroyscock 2 years ago
each ball is the size of an atom
xXBeach 1 year ago
nice job with the images and animations but I must say that the descriptions or explanations were vague and crude.
It would have been nice if you connected all those different parts or generalized the idea.
wa9r 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ok noone gives a fuck bout the future ok
we all need to get fuckin laid
support forced rape
blackoil911 2 years ago
what about giving concrete and real data instead of starting every sentence with "possibly", "suposingly", "many", "could". It gives allot and no information at once...
yoshyoka 2 years ago
This is just a speculative insite into the possible applications for nanotechnology. Nothing more.
geekofsteal 2 years ago
but still, basic ideas/concepts could be generalized and/or simplified. not much of a hustle.
wa9r 2 years ago
So, what exactly is wrong with this video?
geekofsteal 2 years ago
the fact that there seems to be nothing wrong with it.
wa9r 2 years ago
Do you suppose we could design a scalar magnetic resistor to affect the size to which we grow in relation to the Earth. Talk about unlimited resources!
bqreus 3 years ago
amazing thanks for up-loading :)
yis2 3 years ago