2 2 5 ??

[CookieNightmares]

its not so shut the fuck up you twat.

[bennnnnjobih]

sorry, I didn't see that you copyed this from an other post

[jelovac94]

The mistake is in the 3rd row! At 3:40 min. you can see he wrote:

B^2 - 2AB + A^2 This is incorrect!!! It should be: "(B-A)^2 = B^2 - 2BA + A^2"

B^2 - 2BA + A^2 This is correct! "2AB" not equal "2BA"

Can't belive no one noticed, or you just lousy in math!???

[TheDedicationMusic]

@jelovac94 2BA is the same as 2AB if A = 2 and B= 3 then they would be 2(3)(2) and 2(2)(3) which is the same thing

[bennnnnjobih]

@jelovac94 man, you're an idiot!!!

2 times A times B is te same as

2 times B times A

dumbass

[TheFirefoxx7]

First of all, the numbers must me same on both sides and you say 4=5, it`s not true, so 2+2 is 4 and 4 is not 5 :)

[lamsebamse462]

2girls+(2boys with one condom)=5 human. :)

[MrDaconi]

Math freaks :P



[roachslayyer]

on the 3rd line it cancels down to 1=-14 (using bodmas) work it out your self before posting.

the only way for 4=5 is if you use quadratic and X=4 or 5, (X=X) and then it can't be both at the same time!

[MaWo04]

0=0

no proof here

[steflamza]

idiot!!!!!! everything is wrong

[steflamza]

idiot!!!!!!

[ohyahim]

So dividing by 0 is definied now? i guess a guy on youtube can change the laws of math

[XephSlayer]

in step 2, where did C(B-A)=(B-A)^2

where did the ^2 come from?

[cybersekkin]

watched carefully and division by zero --- (the last cancellation) bad boy--mah is correct just doesn't work for your numbers as they would cause a division by zero.

[mil3211231]

2 girls + 2 girls= 5 girls aahhhsahah

[dac38555]

YOU =MORON

[CrunchyCardMachinima]

you multiplied one but squared the other

[boythotpik]

definitely wrong solution..it must be this way.....

c=b-a/(b-a)

c(b-a)=b-a

[warfaredevil5]

@boythotpik that cannot happen, you multiply both sides of the equation, not just one, that's the way how you eliminate the things you dont want, or add stuff

[jugrajsingh1]

u dumbass

when he wrote

c=b-a/b-a

he means to miltiply b-a throughout

got that

[londonpind]

@jugrajsingh1 i was gonna comment on the same thing but i already found it spotted. lol

[kilrazan]

Everyone assumes he is dividing with those slashes. He isn't dividing, he is separating the equation from his next step. The whole thing works all the way up until he divides both sides by (B-C-A) because that = 0... can't divide by 0.

[planasite]

now i know why 5 isn't the answer in 2+2!

we always forget to put a smiley face!

[Curdiman]

b-c-a = 0

you divided by zero, that's what went wrong in your proof

[OnlyPianoLogic]

The second line is wrong, you multiplied the left hand side by (b-A) and the right hand side by (B-A)^2. Epic fail

[imbored6369]

at the end of the video he assumes that 2x2=4 in order to replace the 4 with 2x2 completely defeating the purpose of the "proof"....

[MightyGoldenBoy]

Dividing by zero is funny. :P

[killerman2888]

The equation is already wrong at the 2nd statment

[14jstorm]

why did i just search this up.... im LOOSING IT!!!!

[tigergameF1]

let's look at your last before final equation,

A(B-C-A)=B(B-C-A)

(A/B-C-A)-(B/B-C-A) cross section dividing by zero no solution.

and than your solution what is wrong with it? you divide by B-C-A=0 which is impossible!

[goldfingerrrrr]

Clarifying the error in the 3rd row

C(B-A) does equal CB-CA so left side is good

However

(B-A)^2 = B^2 - 2AB + A^2

Where the heck did this guy get / -A^2 ?

He had no right to arbitrarily divide something by -16

[Awesomolicity]

You know...I bet you're just doing this to get that one extra ounce of heroin. =O Whilst you are high, you might find a way to prove that 5 x 5 = -2.348 or something.

[carret34]

I think it wrong i just like prooving my sister wrong:)

[whaleysct]

my brain hurts.

[KingAJT93]

theres so many corrections in comments....

[uberfunk100]

easily proven wrong. first lets establish that the rule of zero is u cannot divide by zero. in the last set of equation u have

A(B-A-C) = B(B-A-C) substituting ull get 4(0) = 5(0). 0 does equal zero but when u cross both (B-A-C), u are technically dividing by (B-A-C). u are dividing by zero so that is ur mistake. for people who think u can subtract (B-A-C), u cant because u cant subtract a multiplication problem

[swat22camden]

well u did all that for nothing. let me proove something: if u have 2 apples, then u bought 2 more, you have 4. Idiot. ;D

[Gevor92]

@swat22camden Can you divide one apple and two apple?

[swat22camden]

@Gevor92 what?

[mevidek]

Yeah makes quite a lot of sense, but some bits are a bit confusing...

But yeah, good theory

[TheColaGoodfellow]

It's obviously a faulty equation, because it assumes that 2 is 1 + 1, and it assumes that 5 is 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1.

No equation can prove something that simply isn't.

[Mr428YAMAHA428]

u r a freakin geek

[mitasrb]

nah

[havabamday13]

AB-CA-A(squared)=B(squared)-CB­-AB actually equals 0=0. it would kind of be A=B but the squared letters being different would have to throw all of it off so technically its 0=0. thats where you messed up at. =DDD

[MrJoeydali]

what does any of this have to do with 2+2?

[shiekheazam]

second step tells that B-A is taken to LHS

and actually B-A=1so 1 and 1^2 are the same the mistake lies in third step why is it divided by -A^2

[Trojanmanjl]

you cant divide by (B-C-A) or (5-1-4) because that is zero and it is mathematically incorrect if you divide by zero.

[teranz0]

The 2nd step should read: C(B-A)=B-A since B-A/B-A x B-A = B-A

[50rambo]

i always knew it

[gordie22rip]

FAILDOM

[CodexCXx]

b-a-c=0

4*0=5*0 true story ;)

[monaflipas]

poop balls?