@pwned101 and that is where you are very, very wrong.. i guess you dont do any research before you post here (creationist style) but it has been proven around 60 years ago for the first time. you probably are not aware that 70% of the object around you are made by humans who are using the "atomic theory" to built these different kinds of materials. if want to learn more type it in on the internet. im not trying to offend you, im just trying to make you not being ignorant and not scared to learn
@WassenaarsMostWanted I was being sarcastic. Atomic Theory never gets mentioned (it's always the Theory of Gravity) when trying to take the "a theory is just a theory" creationist idea one step farther into absurdity. I work on polymer chemistry.
@CupcakeTuber All of Hovinds "theroys" are so totally wrong and obsurd that they are insulting to even an 8 year old. This guy claimed that an 8,000,000 square kilometer asteroid created the polar ice caps. Now in reality, an asteroid that huge would actually hit Earth at about 30 kilometers per second and would release energy equal to a 82,000,000,000 Megaton explosion. The worlds entire nuclear arsenal is only 5,000 Megatons. I'm totally flabbergastered at how stupid Hovind is.
Frankly I find the "error of a trillion" argument misleading.
If I make some exponential calculations and - say - accidentally multiply the exponents instead of add them I could get an "error" of nigh immesurable size. Or (more probably) just a small oversight.
Kent Hovind is in jail because he was trying to warn the world that their is a dark agenda out there that aims at destroying the morality of every man woman and child making them into beasts. In fact Darwinism states that we evolved from mere beasts. God says you should hold your head up because you have been given free will by an all powerful all wise and all loving Creator. Jesus answered "Woe to them who worship the Created (Monkeys/Primates) rather then the Creator."
@rkyeun I don't have to guess. 13.45 billion years is around 4.9 trillion days (HOW DID I DO THAT?!). Divide that by 6. Is that less than a trillion? Yep!
Think before you talk. Stop making atheists look bad.
Creationists are so ingnorant to the workings of science. Thunderf00t thanks for posting these videos. Science will allow us to understand the world that we live in.. Plain and Simple
The amount of water needed to cover the surface of the earth is theoretical ... You got a lot of height differences on the earth .... To cover the top of the mount everest for instance the water has to be as high as the top of the mountain....
...than a city and carrying out almost as many unique functions as all the manufacturing activities of man on earth.
However, it would be a factory which would have one capacity not equalled in any of our own most advanced machines, for it would be capable of replicating its entire structure within a matter of a few hours. To witness such an act at a magnification of one thousand million times would be an awe-inspiring spectacle." Denton, p.329.
...proof-reading devices utilized for quality control, assembly processes involving the principle of prefabrication and modular construction. In fact, so deep would be the feeling of deja-vu, so persuasive the analogy, that much of the terminology we would use to describe this fascinating molecular reality would be borrowed from the world of late twentieth-century technology. What we would be witnessing would be an object resembling an immense automated factory, a factory larger ...
God spoke things into existence; it is His design, information, commands, instructions in all that is created.
"We would see [in cells] that nearly every feature of our own advanced machines had its analogue in the cell: artificial languages and their decoding systems, memory banks for information storage and retrieval, elegant control systems regulating the automated assembly of parts and components, error fail-safe and ...
The coded information in the nucleotide sequence is meaningless without the translation machinery, but the specification for this machinery is itself coded in the DNA. Thus without the machinery the information is meaningless, but without the coded information the machinery cannot be produced! This presents a paradox of the chicken and egg variety, and attempts to solve it have so far been sterile. John C. Walton, Organization and the Origin of Life, Origins, Vol.4, No.1, 1977, pp.3031.
Information Science has discovered God’s word in nature
"The basic flaw of all evolutionary views is the origin of the information in living beings. It has never been shown that a coding system and semantic information could originate by itself in a material medium, and the information theorems predict that this will never be possible. A purely material origin of life is thus precluded." Gitt, p.124. Werner Gitt, In the Beginning Was Information, 2nd edition (Bielefeld, Germany: CLV, 2000)"
@deckard9757 These two videos of mine which cannot be refuted, exposes Evolutionism as pseudoscience and the Atheist Lie and Atheist Religion that it is.
I do love how thinking rationally for one minute can show how totally stupid these Creationist prats are. What's even better, is they are sat, right now, reading this very comment, ON A COMPUTER (or smartphone) which was developed, not by God, but by science. They're very presence in these debates is hypocritical.
@AtheistScientific Your name is oxymoronic. There is no such thing as Atheistic Science, or evolutionary biologist or evolutionary scientist. Nobody saw or sees mindless and lifeless raw elements collaborating to contrive biological life i.e. the alleged common ancestor of all or its transmutation into all the life forms that ever lived. One cannot have science/knowledge about things that are imagined/presumed to have happened.
The atheism is moronic and based on ignorance about the truth.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN the only reason I have this name is because youtube wouldn't give me ScientificAtheist. which I wanted since I like science and am an atheist, but I guess you are one of those who just "knows" immediatly. How can you parade "truth" if your argument is that nobody saw what happens. in order to make it the truth it has to be observed and proven, not fantasized into existence. by other words. your argument is Oxymoronic.
@AtheistScientific Your nickname would remain oxymoronic if it was ScientificAtheist. The scientific method of enquiry can only occur in a world which is created logically with order such that things happen occurring to commands/rules/instructions the design put into all things created i.e. a superior intelligence is needed we call GOD. God is Truth and the author of truth and does not lie; He is the eyewitness to all that He created. Adam is a witness to animals God made for him to name etc.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN No it wouldn't, use your head. And to say Adam witnessed it is bullshit. Adam is made up like mickey mouse. even the vatican, the foremost authority of catholism acknowledges that. And the world isnt logically created. life just evolved and adapted so it would appear that the earth is perfectly suited for just us. Tell me, do you believe in unicorns too?
@AtheistScientific I used my head. Atheism is a position from ignorance and arrogance to deny what you cannot since you do not have all knowledge. You do not realize that you cannot conduct science i.e. the study of God's creation using your God given sense and brains unless the world was created with order, purpose, function etc. A chaotic world in continual change by happenstance is one that science cannot be conducted since events are not dependably repeating. DUH.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN you make the mistake of thinking that Atheism trusts in science. to be an atheist just mean that we dont believe in a god. not because we can prove there isn't a god. but because you can't prove there is. you didnt answer my question. do you believe in unicorns?
And another question which I think is yes. Do you believe in the bibles story about adams creation to be 100% true and that it is logical?
@AtheistScientific I believe insects and animals do have centrally located horns/corns, however, the Unicorn you have in your imagination is not Biblical. It is a flying horse with a sharp point metal horn. DUH
The Bible is not full of any stories/fables; it is an eyewitness account of events, peoples and places which Archaeologist keep finding artifacts and structure to confirm it. All the evidence points to a special onetime creation by a superior intelligence/God and a catastrophic judgment.
@AtheistScientific If you can search the web you can find the Archaeological evidence that supports the Biblical claims about peoples places and events.
I will give you one source to help you. christiananswers . net/archaeology/home . html
@AtheistScientific Oh, really, what contradiction; you did not stipulate? If you will, first define what a contradiction is, then give me the passage in full context, then the alleged contradiction and why? Otherwise SHUT UP if YOU WILL NOT PUT UP.
@deckard9757 Do you promulgate the pseudoscientific fairy tale lies of Evolution from pond scum to you by mindless and lifeless raw elements that collaborated by happenstance with the hero a lot of time which is only imagined and never directly observed, tested, document or reproduced as the scientific method requires? YES YOU DO. This is an evil lie that defrauds God of His Glory as the Creator. Therefore, this is your lie which makes you EVIL.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN HA! HA! HA! "Which is only imagined and never directly observed," As was creation as the Tablet 1 referred to by P J Wiseman doesn't exist! Now answer the rest of my questions LOSER!
@deckard9757 The original tablets, may not exist, however, the book of Genesis compiled by Moses was based on the text of the original autographs on stone or clay or Leather that Moses received from his people during the Exodus from Egypt. I answered your questions. Specify which question instead of making lame useless comments. Do you want to continue to face palm and look like an anti-intellectual? Who saw, tested, documented and can reproduce pond scum to you evolution? NOBODY & UNSCIENTIFIC!
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "eyewitness accounts" of a "flying horse with a sharp metal horn"? HA! HA! HA! For how many hours a day do you practice being that stupid?. As you so full of illogical shit, where did the water come from to raise sea levels to cover all the land masses? You see, as it's already an established fact that if all the ice on Earth was converted into liquid form it would raise global sea levels by 20ft and our water cycle is a closed system where did the remaining 28000ft come from?
@deckard9757 the BIG MORON. The mountains that exist today were not those in Noah's day. The highest mountains have marine fossils on them which means they were near sea level when sediments and marine creatures were swept on to land by the Global Flood which had gigantic tsunamis resulting from the foundations of the great deep breaking up. The mid-Atlantic ridge clearly shows magma the oozed out to displace water and cause radiating tsunamis. Ocean levels have risen more than 200ft by ice melt
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN " The mountains that exist today were not those in Noah's day." HA! HA! HA! So the entire Himalayas Rose up 20000ft + in a few thousand years which means that the Indian sub-continent must have hit the Eurasian landmass like a speedboat! However, you don't believe in fossils so why are you using them in your argument? That said, as the sea level limit is restricted to 20ft where did the remainder come from? "Ocean levels have risen more than 200ft by ice melt" LIES! Evidence?
@deckard9757 That is correct that mountains were raised very quickly, otherwise there would not be marine fossil atop of all the high mountains. Fossils are evidence of the Global Flood; therefore, STOP LYING by saying I do not believe in fossils. I SAID EVIL EVOLUTIONISM AND UG DOES NOT MAKE FOSSILS AND SEDIMENTARY FOSSILIFERROUS LAYERS, WHICH MEANS THAT EVIL EVOLUTIONISM CANNOT HIJACK THIS EVIDENCE FOR ITS FAIRY TALE CLAIMS.
You can Google costal villages/cities that are submerged.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN as you think I lied about the synthesis of RNA and YouTube won't allow me to post the reference I've messaged it to you. Maybe they're all LIARS! HA! HA! HA!
@deckard9757 The synthesis of RNA as I said; Life was not made, the tinkering involved existing biological material and human intelligence to make this work unnatural and not materialistic. DUH I highlighted excerpted for the PM message I gave you to read several times since it is not sinking into you cement head.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "The Bible is not full of any stories/fables; it is an eyewitness account of events, peoples and places which Archaeologist keep finding artifacts and structure to confirm it." HA! HA! HA! Really? Evidence please.
After you've replied to my earlier comments of course ...
@deckard9757 the NUMB NUT that cannot research the web.
"The Bible is not full of any stories/fables; it is an eyewitness account of events, peoples and places which Archaeologist keeps finding artifacts and structure to confirm it." HA! HA! HA! Really? Evidence please.
Here you go MORON christiananswers . net/archaeology/home . html
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN quote the "evidence" for your ridiculous comment on the raising of sea levels by 200ft during Noah's flood and the creation of the Himalayas in only a few thousand years. Next you can provide evidence that there were no land masses higher than your quoted 200ft at the time of this supposed flood and why there is no evidence anywhere on this planet it ever occurred.
@deckard9757 the EVIL LYING ATHEIST. I did not say "the raising of sea levels by 200ft during Noah's flood and the creation of the Himalayas in only a few thousand years. and ... there were no land masses higher than your quoted 200ft at the time of this supposed flood ". You are such a typical dumb Brit. You can just copy and paste them to avoid making these fallacious Straw man arguments. THE RISE IN THE SEA LEVEL AFTER THE PEAK OF THE ICE AGE BY GLACIAL MELT WAS MORE THAN 200 FEET. DUH
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN HA! HA! HA! Is LYING your hobby? Here are your quotes "Ocean levels have risen more than 200ft by ice melt" and " The mountains that exist today were not those in Noah's day." "THE RISE IN THE SEA LEVEL AFTER THE PEAK OF THE ICE AGE BY GLACIAL MELT WAS MORE THAN 200 FEET. DUH" HA! HA! HA! You really are so fucking stupid - ice ages cause the sea levels to fall not rise!! HA! HA! HA!
@deckard9757 I TOLD YOU TO GOOGLE COSTAL VILLAGES SUBMERGED, WHICH YOU DID NOT BOTHER TO. A SUBMERGED COSTAL VILLAGE IN THE GLOBAL FLOOD/ICE AGE EPOCH MODEL FITS PERFECTLY I.E. AFTER THE GLOBAL FLOOD AND AFTER THE ICE AGE THAT ENSUED DELIVERED OCEAN WATERS TO THE POLES TO BECOME THE GLACIERS, AND AFTER IT’S PEAK BUT BEFORE THE GLACIAL MELT, THE SETTLEMENTS ON THE COAST WERE ESTABLISHED. AFTER THE HUMAN HABITATS EXISTED THE GLACIAL MELT RAISED THE SEA LEVEL TO SUBMERGE THE SETTLEMENTS. DUH
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN careful with your capitals - anger has detrimental affects on blood pressure! As for your "coastal submerged village" crap - HA! HA! HA! " A SUBMERGED COSTAL VILLAGE IN THE GLOBAL FLOOD/ICE AGE EPOCH MODEL FITS PERFECTLY" fits what? Explain. Although I doubt you can. "AFTER THE GLOBAL FLOOD AND AFTER THE ICE AGE THAT ENSUED" HA! HA! HA! The last ICE AGE hasn't finished yet, you idiot! Perhaps you mean "Glacial Period"? That finished 12500 years ago.
@deckard9757 THE EVIL LYING BRITISH ATHEIST. The site shows sea levels increased 140 meters! DUH wattsupwiththat . com/2010/12/01/sea-level-rise-jumpy-after-last-ice-age/
This site shows sea levels increased 120 meters! DUH giss . nasa.gov/research/briefs/gornitz_09/
Did you bother to Google submerged villages which had to be settled before the Glacial Melt since the Global Flood that precipitated the Ice Age that lowered the sea levels? I pay no regard to Atheistic dating methods & terms.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "The site shows sea levels increased 140 meters!" HA! HA! HA! And they means it happened globally does it?! They're nothing more than isolated events! If you want to LIE then choose a different subject!
@deckard9757 HTBK>"The site shows sea levels increased 140 meters!"
The numb nut Brit said "HA! HA! HA! And they means it happened globally does it?! They're nothing more than isolated events!" Which is a typical bare assertion fallacy that illogical anti-intellectual Atheists use. The EVIL LYING ATHEIST then said "If you want to LIE then choose a different subject!" Now this numb nut Brit is projecting himself as some authority. YOU HAVE NOTHING BUT WORTHLESS TRIPE TO OFFER.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN provide the evidence that your quoted events are reflected globally. That will of course require you to demonstrate where the additional water came from (Hovind's meteor perhaps?), where the global mass biocide layer is situated, how animals on other continents swam thousands of miles without food or freshnwater to reach the "ark" and evidence of how Noah's family produced black, indian and oriental sub-types in a few thousand years .
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN HA! HA! HA! "MORE FALLACIES", state them and your evidence that they are. Then, once you've apologized for this LIE perhaps you'll apologize for for your errors concerning the gospel discrepancies regarding the "birth" of Jesus, your inability to count in multiples of a thousand regarding the age of your supposed "biblical" tablets from Mesopotamia "signed" by Adam, your ignorance of plate tectonics and the origin and age of the Himalayas!
@deckard9757 THE EVIL LYING BRITISH ATHEIST. SINCE YOU DO NOT KNOW THE GLOBAL FLOOD/ICE EPOCH MODEL, WHEN YOU MISREPRESENT THIS MODEL YOU COMMIT THE STRAW MAN, AND BARE ASSERTION FALLACIES. DUH.
THE GOSPEL DOES NOT TELL US THE BIRTH DATE OF JESUS. DUH.
THE BIBLICAL TABLETS ARE NOT FROM MESOPOTAMIA; RATHER THE TOLEDOTH PRACTICE IS CONFIRMED AND SUPPORTS THE GENESIS ACCOUNT AND ITS USE OF TOLEDOTHS. DUH
YOU DO NOT KNOW THE AGE OF ANYTHING OR PLATE TECTONICS. DUH
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Hi Kathy! Here we go again, BLAH! BLAH! BLAH! It's already established that the available water on Earth exists in a closed system and that if all the ice melted it would raise global sea levels by 20ft! So I'll ask you again where did the remaining water come from to destroy all life on Earth? " THE BIBLICAL TABLETS ARE NOT FROM MESOPOTAMIA" HA! HA! HA! Yes they are, and by thway no-one including theologians buy into your toledoth version of ancient history!
@deckard9757 THE BRITISH EXPERT FACE PALMER. I GAVE YOU 2 WEB SITES SUPPORTING 120 METERS OF GLACIAL MELT, ONE THEM BEING NASA. FACE PALMER!
THE CLOSED SYSTEM OF THE EARTH CONTAINS ALL THE WATER NECESSARY TO FLOOD THE EARTH; IF, ALL THE MOUNTAINS WERE USED TO FILL ALL THE DEEP OCEAN VALLEYS TO MAKE IT SMOOTH, THERE WOULD BE ABOUT 2 MILES OF WATER COVERING IT. THE OPINIONS OF THEOLOGIANS IS IRRELEVANT WITH RESPECT TO THE BIBLICAL TEXT THAT USES TOLEDOTHS BEFORE MESOPOTAMIANS. DUH FACE PALM.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN " I GAVE YOU 2 WEB SITES SUPPORTING 120 METERS OF GLACIAL MELT, ONE THEM BEING NASA." HA! HA! HA! Neither of which even mention a global flood or relate their findings to such a ridiculous concept!
THE SITES YOU WERE GIVEN WAS TO SHOW THAT SEA LEVELS HAVE RISEN SUFFICIENTLY TO SUBMERGE COSTAL VILLAGES WHICH CONFIRMS THE ICE EPOCH THAT ENSUED THE GLOBAL FLOOD. FOR COSTAL VILLAGES TO BE SUBMERGED, THE VILLAGES HAD TO BE FOUNDED BEFORE THE GLACIAL MELT. THE SITES I GAVE YOU SUPPORT A RISE OF 120 METERS.
IT IS IRRELEVANT THAT THE ATHEIST ORGANIZATION, NASA, DOES NOT CORRELATE THE SEA LEVEL RISE TO THE WATER DISPLACED TO THE POLES DURING THE GLOBAL FLOOD. DUH
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "THE SITES YOU WERE GIVEN WAS TO SHOW THAT SEA LEVELS HAVE RISEN SUFFICIENTLY TO SUBMERGE COSTAL VILLAGES WHICH CONFIRMS THE ICE EPOCH THAT ENSUED THE GLOBAL FLOOD." HA! HA! HA! No they don't! where is your NASA evidence? Yet more LIES from the PARENTAL FAILURE!
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN ""EVOLUTION DOES NOT MAKE FOSSILIFERROUS SEDIMENTARY LAYERS.2 HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! You said this yesterday, the comment is there for all to see!"
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "THE GOSPEL DOES NOT TELL US THE BIRTH DATE OF JESUS. DUH." HA! HA! HA! You said that they do! According to you the gospels are "eyewitness accounts". So explain how, as I've asked you countless times, how Matthew and Luke's "accounts" are at least 10 years apart!
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN fucking hell, how many times do I have to repeat this simple example of grammar?
MATT 2 :1 "NOW WHEN JESUS WAS BORN IN BETHLEHEM OF JUDEA IN THE DAYS OF HEROD THE KING" (who died in 4BCE).
LUKE 2: 1 - 2 "AND IT CAME TO PASS IN THOSE DAYS, THAT THERE WENT OUT A DECREE FROM CAESAR AUGUSTUS THAT ALL THE WORLD SHOULD BE TAXED. AND THIS TAXING WAS FIRST MADE WHEN CYRENIUS WAS GOVENOR OR SYRIA" (Which occurred in 6CE).
@deckard9757 the MORON. As I pointed out, the Biblical text does not give us the birth date of Jesus. You are using extra-biblical dates assigned by sources outside of the Biblical text. You do not know when 1BC/1AD junction occurred. The Biblical text only tell us that Herod was still King when Jesus was born and that Mary and Joseph went to Bethlehem to register based on degree that first began when Cyrenius was Governor of Syria and continued by a decree from Caesar Augustus. DUH face palm.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "You are using extra-biblical dates assigned by sources outside of the Biblical text". HA! HA! HA! That's right, fuckwit, I'm using hard archaeological evidence that's beyond dispute. Don't try to worm your way out of the howling errors you've made by trying that old chestnut again!
@deckard9757 who is without logic and without discernment and cannot read the Bible said "I'm using hard archaeological evidence that's beyond dispute." What archaeological evidence establishes the birth date of Jesus, the junction of 1BC/1AD, and the death of Herod? PUT UP OR SHUT UP. As I pointed out, the Biblical text does not give us the birth date of Jesus.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Oh dear, you really are incapable of rational thought aren't you? The junction is immaterial, there is a 10 year gap between the death of Herod the Great and Quirinius becoming Governor of Syria. By the way there is no evidence whatsoever that Caesar Augustus ordered a census involving the indigenous populations around that time (don't quote Josephus, it's already recognised as bullshit) and no Roman census ever required the Jews to register in their tribal capitals.
@deckard9757 the nitwit BRIT. To establish the Birth date of Jesus the junction of 1BC/1AD is relevant since there is an error of several years. THE PROVEN LIAR IS YOU, AN EVIL LYING ATHEIST. Josephus is a credible historian and you are an incredible evil lying atheist. The Bible is historically accurate; archaeological evidence continues to confirm its accuracy.
How long would it take to conduct a census in the ancient world where communication is by word of mouth, letter, etc.?
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN HA! HA! HA! You are so truly stupid! I wasn't establishing the "birth" of Jesus (as I stated if you could read properly). I was successfully discrediting the accuracy of your "eyewitness" gospel accounts! Do you want me to draw you a diagram and send it to you? Herod the Great did not die in the same year as Quirinius became Governor of Syria therefore one or both of the gospels of Matthew and Luke are wrong! Something you should be used to!
@deckard9757 THE EVIL LYING ATHEIST. YOU CERTAINLY DID BEGIN SOME 2 WKS AGO TRYING TO SHOW THAT THE BIRTH DATE OF JESUS DID NOT AGREE BETWEEN LUKE AND MATTHEW. THE PROBLEM IS THAT YOU WERE FORCING ON THE TEXT DATES ASSIGNED BY EXTRA-BIBLICAL SOURCES ON PERSONS MENTIONED I.E. HEROD THE KING, AND "QUIRINIUS BECAME GOVERNOR OF SYRIA" TO QUOTE YOUR GOOF. JESUS WAS NOT BORN THE DAY HEROD DIED, & THE CENSUS BEGAN WITH QUIRINIUS, HOWEVER, MARY & JOSEPH GO TO BETHLEHEM UNDER THE AUGUSTAN DECREE. DUH
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "TRYING TO SHOW THAT THE BIRTH DATE OF JESUS DID NOT AGREE BETWEEN LUKE AND MATTHEW" HA! HA! HA! No I didn't, as I stipulated yesterday and the day before! Your supposed 'confusion' cannot be disguised - you're simply a LIAR!
1 "JESUS WAS NOT BORN THE DAY HEROD DIED" I didn't say he was. LIE No. 1.
2 "THE CENSUS BEGAN WITH QUIRINIUS" There was no census. LIE No. 2.
3 "UNDER THE AUGUSTAN DECREE" There was no decree, as there was no census! LIE No. 3.
1 "JESUS WAS NOT BORN THE DAY HEROD DIED" I didn't say he was. LIE No. 1. < I did not say you did; I only made a statement because you did not indicate what date Jesus was born? When before Herod's death was Jesus born? Duh. As for your bare assertion fallacies for your points 2 and 3, your opinion is worthless; I do not respect your opinion on any matter. How old are you? Where you there 2000 years ago?
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Your attempts at distraction are pitiful. I'll ask you yet again. Herod the Great did not die (Matt 2:1) in the same year as Qurinius became Governor of Syria (Luke 2: 2) and yet botn are used by the said authors of the year in which Jesus was "born". You have stated repeatedly that both are "eyewitness accounts". Now, explain how this can be the case when clearly one or both accounts are wrong.
@deckard9757 the cement head. The Biblical text only tells us that King Herod was still alive and that the census was decreed and nothing more. The Bible does not give a birthday for Jesus. DUH
Mat 2:1..."Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king". Luke 2:1-2..."in those days that a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered. This census first took place while Quirinius was governing Syria"
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "The Biblical text only tells us that King Herod was still alive and that the census was decreed and nothing more". And that's why it's WRONG! Because Herod was dead when the Quirinius became Governor of Syria and Augustus supposedly decreed the imaginary census. Congratulations, you've just proved yourself wrong! To help embarrass you still further I'd like you to provide credible evidence that any Roman census required the Jews to register in their tribal home town.
@deckard9757 the royal ignoramus: "The Biblical text only tells us that King Herod was still alive and that the census was decreed and nothing more".
You need to establish that your assumptions are correct before you can impose your version of history on the Biblical Text to claim there is a contradiction. DUH. You are not arguing from the text, you are using the opinions of critics against the text. The Bible does not tell us the Birthdate of Jesus.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN ""The Biblical text only tells us that King Herod was still alive and that the census was decreed and nothing more". HA! HA! HA! No it doesn't. Why are you LYINH? Quote the verses that support this.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "4BCE and 6CE. Matt 2:1 and Luke 2:1-2, and as you're clearly a 'hard of thinking' case I'll point it out for you - Herod died in 4BCE and Cyrenius became governor of Syria in 6CE."
@deckard9757 the MORON is avoiding my point. THE BIBLE DOES NOT TELL US WHAT DATE JESUS WAS BORN; IT DOES NOT USE 4BCE OR 6BCE IN Matt 2:1 & Luke 2:1-2. YOU ARE USING EXTRA-BIBLICAL SOURCES FOR DATES THAT ARE NOT ACCURATELY ESTABLISHED TO FALLACIOUSLY CREATE A PERIOD THAT THE BIBLE DID NOT STIPULATE. IS YOUR DEBATE WITH THE EXTRA-BIBLICAL REFERENCE MATERIAL AND THE DATES THE WRITERS ALLEGE? YES IT IS.
GET AN EDUCATION ON LOGIC AND WHAT IT FALLACIOUS SO THE YOU CAN END YOUR CONSTANT USE OF IT.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN ""This makes the oldest writings of Genesis 6000 years old or 4000BC numb nut." HA! HA! HA! But as I stated they're not from 4000BCE! More LIES! "You must be a numb nut American" HA! HA! You already know I'm British - as your earlier ridiculous xenophobic remarks demonstrated - so why LIE again?!"
@deckard9757 THE BRITISH NUMB NUT THAT LOVES TO FACE PALM.
HTBK >"This makes the oldest writings of Genesis 6000 years old or 4000BC numb nut."
THE BRIT SAID "HA! HA! HA! But as I stated they're not from 4000BCE!" YOU ARE ENDLESSLY USING YOUR WORTHLESS OPINION IN YOUR ARGUMENTS. YOU CAN STATE WHAT YOU WANT ALL DAY LONG; YOUR STATEMENTS REMAIN WORTHLESS TRIPE.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN HA! HA! HA! You're even too stupid to admit when you're wrong! Tell me, as the most recent mass biocide layer dates from 65 million years ago and demonstrates the extinction of the dinosaurs (it's called the Yucatan Impact by the way) how could they possibly co-exist with humans? You do realise that "The Flinstones" is a cartoon and not a documentary series don't you? Where is yourv evidence for a flying horse with a metal horn?
UG AND EVOLUTION DOES NOT MAKE FOSSILIFERROUS SEDIMENTARY LAYERS. THE BIOMASS IN OIL, COAL, NG AND DINOSAUR TISSUE ALL CONTAIN C14 WHICH INDICATES LESS THAN 50,000 YEARS OLD USING THE BOGUS RADIOMETRIC DATING GAMES. THE YUCATAN IMPACT HAS FALLEN AS AN ALLEGED EXTINCTION EVENT FOR THE DINOS DON'T YOU KNOW? POND SCUM TO YOU EVOLUTION NEVER HAPPENED, OR HAPPENS AND CANNOT HAPPEN IN DEFIANCE OF THE APPLICABLE LAWS & PRINCIPLES OF SCIENCE. DUH YOU FAIL!
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "EVOLUTION DOES NOT MAKE FOSSILIFERROUS SEDIMENTARY LAYERS." HA! HA! HA! No-one said it did, fuckwit (BTW "nitwit" is all one word)! Yet another LIE! Death and geology create fossils, stupid. Did you ever attend a real school or one run by Kent Hovind? " DINOSAUR TISSUE ALL CONTAIN C14 WHICH INDICATES LESS THAN 50,000 YEARS" HA! HA! HA! Dinosaur and all fossils are dated using rubidium/strontium, thorium/lead, potassium/argon, argon/argon, or uranium/lead, not C14> MORE LIES!
@deckard9757 I DID NOT SAY YOU SAID "EVOLUTION DOES NOT MAKE FOSSILIFERROUS SEDIMENTARY LAYERS." I SAID THIS & IT'S A FACT, THEREFORE, EVIL EVOLUTIONISM CANNOT USE FOSSILS AS EVIDENCE FOR EVIL EVOLUTIONISM AND IT CANNOT USE SEDIMENTARY LAYERS TO CLAIM THAT IT IS A CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD OF CHANGE OVER DEEP TIME; FOR ALL THE FLORA AND FAUNA WAS BURIED QUICKLY BY WATER BORN SEDIMENT ON A GLOBAL SCALE TO CREATE THE FOSSIL RECORD & GRAVEYARDS BEFORE DECAY. ALL BIOLOGICAL TISSUES HAVE MEASURABLE C14.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "EVOLUTION DOES NOT MAKE FOSSILIFERROUS SEDIMENTARY LAYERS.2 HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! You said this yesterday, the comment is there for all to see!
@deckard9757 Are you well? I think you need medical attention. You are losing it. This comment agrees with what I claimed yesterday and now you are making statements as if I did not make the statement.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN therefore as recent glacial melts only account for 30% and as previously stated the release of all ice cap melt water would raise global sea levels by a mere 20ft, the amount available for your imaginary "global flood" could at best have raised sea levels by a paltry 6ft!
I hope that you don't have any children, you must be a real embarrassment to them.
@deckard9757 the uneducated nitwit Brit. The Global Flood recorded by the eyewitness, Noah, was about 4300 years ago with the ice age ensuing to move water off the Earth to the poles to expose land. How much ice would be needed to raise the sea level by 120 meters in the past 4000 years or so? The amount of water remaining at the poles to be melted may be as you say 20 feet. What does this have to do with the ice that covered all of Canada and parts of northern USA?
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN HA! HA! HA! Is the education system in Canada so poor? Can't you even grasp a concept of such logical and evidential simplicity that it's understood by children? If your Judaic camp fire folklore were true why is there no mass biocide layer that resulted from it?
@deckard9757 THE TOTAL MORON. THE BIOMASS THAT DIED IN THE GLOBAL FLOOD IS EVIDENTIAL ALL OVER THE WORLD I.E. IN THE FOSSIL RECORD, IN THE COAL, GAS/NG FIELDS, POLYSTRATE FOSSILS ETC.
@deckard9757 the nitwit BRIT! The humans are in the Oil/NG and possibly fossil undiscovered. It was God’s intention to destroy the vile humanity which may have been so thorough.
Where are all the human skeletons/fossils of the past 1 million years of your fairy tale story of EVIL Evolutionism?
The bogus evidence of human evolution is so little it fits on a billiard table.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "Where are all the human skeletons/fossils of the past 1 million years of your fairy tale story of EVIL Evolutionism?" HA! HA! HA! Read 'em and weep you ignorant moose-fucking blert;
Homo Erectus - Indonesia, Spain, China, Algeria, Ethiopia, Greece
homo Heidelgergensis - UK, Spain, Italy, Ethiopia, Germany, Tanzania, Morocco, South Africa, France
Homo Neanderthalensis - UK, Germany, Greece, Israel, Croatia, France, Italy, Belgium
@deckard9757 the nitwit Brit. Whatever locations you list for the evidence of humans was not the issue. DUH. The issue is quantity. If your fairy tale evolutionism occurred over a million years and the Global Flood of Noah did not happen, there should be innumerable skeletons of humans as well as transitional forms. However, the bogus evidence occupies but a billiard table. WOW not much for a million years of imagined evolution.
YOU CONTINUALLY FAIL TO GRASP THE ISSUE AND STAY ON TOPIC. DUH
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "Where are all the human skeletons/fossils of the past 1 million years of your fairy tale story of EVIL Evolutionism?" "Whatever locations you list for the evidence of humans was not the issue." HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! So now you're changing the goalposts, how PATHETIC!
"There should be innumerable skeletons of humans as well as transitional forms" HA! HA! HA! How fucking stupid can you get? Ever thought why we're not 10ft deep in remains? Scavengers and decay FUCKWIT!
@deckard9757 THE MORON AND EVIL LYING ATHEIST. THIS ISSUE STARTED WITH YOU WANTING TO KNOW WHAT HAPPEN TO ALL THE BIOMASS & HUMANS THAT DIED IN THE GLOBAL FLOOD. I SAID IT IS THE COAL, OIL/NG FIELDS AND FOSSIL RECORD. THE MASS OF HUMANS BEING IN THE OIL/NG AND UNDISCOVERED FOSSILS AS THE REASON FOR THE VERY FEW FOSSILS FOUND SINCE THE GLOBAL FLOOD ABOUT 4300 YEARS AGO. THE VERY FEW HUMAN FOSSILS IS A BIGGER PROBLEM FOR THE ALLEGED MILLIONS OF YEARS OF EVOLUTION. SO WHAT ANSWERS DO YOU LIKE?
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "Homo habilis >Junk category mixing some human and some ape fossils"HA! HA! HA! Wrong on every count! Where's your evidence for these re-categorisations?
@deckard9757 REGARDING ""Homo habilis >Junk category mixing some human and some ape fossils"HA! HA! HA! Wrong on every count! Where's your evidence for these re-categorisations?"
@deckard9757 HA Ha Ha thanks for the hardy chuckle. Your comment, "I have. It's all ignorant opinion." to my web reference "trueorigin . org/skull1470 . asp" was so laughable. You are not an authority on anything except EVIL LIES. If you did read the material you would be aware of the issues and misrepresentation.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN I'm so pleased that I helped put a little happiness into your sad and angry life! Nevertheless the website you quoted contains nothing but unsustantiated opinion and is therefore inconsequential.
@deckard9757 the ignoramus. You could not of READ trueorigin . org/skull1470 . asp , but if you did, you obviously did not comprehend the information provided.
@deckard9757 Regarding your questions, a continuation for the British Moron:
6-According to the eyewitness account from Noah, God sent the animals to Noah to board the Ark. The Global Flood model considers the land masses united without the mid-Atlantic ridge that separated the Americas and without the current mountain ranges.
7-We have agreement that all the water is part of Earth's closed system. Any kind of addition from outer space would be minor if it occurred.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "The Global Flood model considers the land masses united without the mid-Atlantic ridge that separated the Americas and without the current mountain ranges." HA! HA! HA! And the credible source of this information is from where?
Out by a factor of trilion - they have that about a lot of things, dont they?
aaqucnaona94 3 days ago
Atomic Theory is *just* a theory, so it must not be true and a drop of water can be split infinitely.
pwned101 1 week ago
@pwned101 and that is where you are very, very wrong.. i guess you dont do any research before you post here (creationist style) but it has been proven around 60 years ago for the first time. you probably are not aware that 70% of the object around you are made by humans who are using the "atomic theory" to built these different kinds of materials. if want to learn more type it in on the internet. im not trying to offend you, im just trying to make you not being ignorant and not scared to learn
WassenaarsMostWanted 1 week ago
@WassenaarsMostWanted I was being sarcastic. Atomic Theory never gets mentioned (it's always the Theory of Gravity) when trying to take the "a theory is just a theory" creationist idea one step farther into absurdity. I work on polymer chemistry.
pwned101 1 week ago
@pwned101 o haha! sorry i didnt noticed you where being sarcastic!
WassenaarsMostWanted 1 week ago
Is it just me or has he made a mistake at 0:54, Isn't it supposed to be 500,000,000 Km^2 = 500,000,000,000 m^2 = 5 x 10^11 m^2
Sasoun1234 1 week ago
@Sasoun1234 Like it matters, potato x potato = carrot, is a much more accurate calculation than what the creationist subhuman scum said.
oBLACKIECHANoo 1 week ago
I LOVE this series! VERY well done! Kudos to the makers of this.
Tommyr 1 week ago
Hovind = Fucktard.
Tommyr 1 week ago
im 13 years old and even i pulled a face at the creationists 'Fact'
looool
CupcakeTuber 1 week ago
@CupcakeTuber Tell me about it, I faceplamed so hard I knocked my teeth out.
NANOFORGE 6 days ago
@NANOFORGE hahaha i think most normal people would do that ;D
CupcakeTuber 5 days ago
@CupcakeTuber All of Hovinds "theroys" are so totally wrong and obsurd that they are insulting to even an 8 year old. This guy claimed that an 8,000,000 square kilometer asteroid created the polar ice caps. Now in reality, an asteroid that huge would actually hit Earth at about 30 kilometers per second and would release energy equal to a 82,000,000,000 Megaton explosion. The worlds entire nuclear arsenal is only 5,000 Megatons. I'm totally flabbergastered at how stupid Hovind is.
NANOFORGE 4 days ago
Frankly I find the "error of a trillion" argument misleading.
If I make some exponential calculations and - say - accidentally multiply the exponents instead of add them I could get an "error" of nigh immesurable size. Or (more probably) just a small oversight.
Artwich 2 weeks ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
Well at least when I finish highschool (if I ever do) I will be a some what street smart hobo. Thank you.
zoidberg96913 2 weeks ago
i can smell something burning
SamuelJCir 3 weeks ago
(for anyone who wants to know how he got 150000 tonnes)
5*(10^33) molecules divided by avagadro's constant - 6*(10^33) - gives the number of moles of water.
multiply this my the molecular mass of H20 (which is 18) gives the mass in grams - 1.5*(10^11) grams
then divide the number of grams by a million to get the mass in tonnes - 150000
OGABell 4 weeks ago
@OGABell Avogadro's number is 6.022x10^23. Probably an innocent typo on your part, but a pretty important difference. :)
schizosmurf1979 3 weeks ago
@schizosmurf1979 ah yes silly me, thanks for pointing that out, I didn't realise I did that :)
OGABell 3 weeks ago
"one drop of world will cover the water"
Sounds legit
NeedForMadnessSVK 1 month ago
IF YA SPREAD IT REAL THIN
RickDemetro 1 month ago
lol i love the tax joke
14koder 1 month ago
Thankfully Kent Hovind and his crackpot ideas are still behind bars for a while longer.
cloudstone123 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Kent Hovind is in jail because he was trying to warn the world that their is a dark agenda out there that aims at destroying the morality of every man woman and child making them into beasts. In fact Darwinism states that we evolved from mere beasts. God says you should hold your head up because you have been given free will by an all powerful all wise and all loving Creator. Jesus answered "Woe to them who worship the Created (Monkeys/Primates) rather then the Creator."
JamesRideout123 1 month ago
Actually, water molecules aren't placed next to each other. In fact the distance between 2 water molecules is quite big.
shiya3 1 month ago
@shiya3 One drop of water is still nowhere near enough to cover the surface of the Earth.
icarus212001 1 month ago
If the drop of water Kent Hovind was talking about was a 150,000 ton drop, then Kent Hovind is correct!!!
PompousPreacher 1 month ago
@PompousPreacher
That's hardly the worst margin of error a creationist assertion has ever produced.
Care to guess how "six days" compares to 13.45 billion years?
rkyeun 1 month ago
@rkyeun I don't have to guess. 13.45 billion years is around 4.9 trillion days (HOW DID I DO THAT?!). Divide that by 6. Is that less than a trillion? Yep!
Think before you talk. Stop making atheists look bad.
schizosmurf1979 3 weeks ago
@schizosmurf1979
Good job. You can do more math than most creationists.
Yep! It's less than a trillion!
rkyeun 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Creationists are so ingnorant to the workings of science. Thunderf00t thanks for posting these videos. Science will allow us to understand the world that we live in.. Plain and Simple
DSMtsi23 1 month ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
This has been flagged as spam show
Conservative Creationist Logic: watch?v=UDBYGXWMAOw
csmcmillion 1 month ago
The amount of water needed to cover the surface of the earth is theoretical ... You got a lot of height differences on the earth .... To cover the top of the mount everest for instance the water has to be as high as the top of the mountain....
scienide77 2 months ago
@scienide77 lol stfu that's not even the point
TheR33l 1 month ago
@scienide77 I think you're confusing covering the surface of the earth with a mono layer and SUBMERGING the earth up to it's highest point.
gigisdad 1 month ago
@gigisdad Maybe so, but that would only be theoretical because water doesnt act like that ... Depends how you interpret "covering" ...
scienide77 1 month ago
@gigisdad
Thing is Hovind beleives the Noah's ark story happened, so scienide77's point is entirely relevant.
NUTCASE71733 1 month ago
Oh i've seen a bigger errors before, Elenin's tidal forces, The moon's forces are a few quadrillion time stronger.
11cookeaw1 2 months ago
Hovind is a fucking idiot i a middle schooler know that one drop of water can't even cover a fraction of the earth
dragsigma 2 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
3 of ?
...than a city and carrying out almost as many unique functions as all the manufacturing activities of man on earth.
However, it would be a factory which would have one capacity not equalled in any of our own most advanced machines, for it would be capable of replicating its entire structure within a matter of a few hours. To witness such an act at a magnification of one thousand million times would be an awe-inspiring spectacle." Denton, p.329.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
2 of ?
...proof-reading devices utilized for quality control, assembly processes involving the principle of prefabrication and modular construction. In fact, so deep would be the feeling of deja-vu, so persuasive the analogy, that much of the terminology we would use to describe this fascinating molecular reality would be borrowed from the world of late twentieth-century technology. What we would be witnessing would be an object resembling an immense automated factory, a factory larger ...
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
1 of ?
God spoke things into existence; it is His design, information, commands, instructions in all that is created.
"We would see [in cells] that nearly every feature of our own advanced machines had its analogue in the cell: artificial languages and their decoding systems, memory banks for information storage and retrieval, elegant control systems regulating the automated assembly of parts and components, error fail-safe and ...
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
The coded information in the nucleotide sequence is meaningless without the translation machinery, but the specification for this machinery is itself coded in the DNA. Thus without the machinery the information is meaningless, but without the coded information the machinery cannot be produced! This presents a paradox of the chicken and egg variety, and attempts to solve it have so far been sterile. John C. Walton, Organization and the Origin of Life, Origins, Vol.4, No.1, 1977, pp.3031.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
Information Science has discovered God’s word in nature
"The basic flaw of all evolutionary views is the origin of the information in living beings. It has never been shown that a coding system and semantic information could originate by itself in a material medium, and the information theorems predict that this will never be possible. A purely material origin of life is thus precluded." Gitt, p.124. Werner Gitt, In the Beginning Was Information, 2nd edition (Bielefeld, Germany: CLV, 2000)"
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These two videos of mine which cannot be refuted, exposes Evolutionism as pseudoscience and the Atheist Lie and Atheist Religion that it is.
youtube . com/watch?v=51hWyBKX9Xs
youtube . com/watch?v=Pi1Foiz6kqE&feature=related
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
Why do people laugh at creationists? Just read the crap excreted by HTBK! 100% WRONG a 100% of the time!
deckard9757 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@deckard9757 the royal british face palmer. Try to refute my videos. Ha ha ha
These two videos of mine which cannot be refuted, exposes Evolutionism as pseudoscience and the Atheist Lie and Atheist Religion that it is.
youtube . com/watch?v=51hWyBKX9Xs
youtube . com/watch?v=Pi1Foiz6kqE&feature=related
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@deckard9757 These two videos of mine which cannot be refuted, exposes Evolutionism as pseudoscience and the Atheist Lie and Atheist Religion that it is.
youtube . com/watch?v=51hWyBKX9Xs
youtube . com/watch?v=Pi1Foiz6kqE&feature=related
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
Is it possible to get a monolayer of water with the high surface tension
+ cohesion of the molecule?
Sardaukar62 2 months ago
lmao! he's right, i'm in high school science and even i was like wait... you cant spread the molecules of one drop around the earth!
jcards94 2 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
Error of a trillion...Wow. That has got to be a world record....
taiwanoob 2 months ago
ONLY 2 THINGS ARE INFINITE
THE UNIVERSE AND HUMAN STUPIDITY
AND I AM NOT SURE ABOUT THE FORMER'
Einstein
shimwah 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These two videos of mine which cannot be refuted, exposes Evolutionism as pseudoscience and the Atheist Lie and Atheist Religion that it is.
youtube . com/watch?v=51hWyBKX9Xs
youtube . com/watch?v=Pi1Foiz6kqE&feature=related
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
why are the comments so long?
Coolshanny 2 months ago
@Coolshanny Because creationist retards watch these videos and scream their outrage in capslock.
PachucoDesigns 2 months ago
I already know why people laugh at creationists, but these are just plain entertaining
RobBrooksMusic 2 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
@RobBrooksMusic it's such fun humiliating the hard of thinking!
deckard9757 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These two videos of mine which cannot be refuted, exposes Evolutionism as pseudoscience and the Atheist Lie and Atheist Religion that it is.
youtube . com/watch?v=51hWyBKX9Xs
youtube . com/watch?v=Pi1Foiz6kqE&feature=related
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
2:17
Fucking burn.
KajexFiredrake 2 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
Logical Fallacies engaged by "His Truth Be Blown":
1) straw man, where he accuses us of misrepresenting a position (definition of science, misquotes) and then knock us down for it
2) ad hominem (Really it's simple name-calling-- "evil lying atheist" is popular )
3) question begging: assuming a piori truth of the biblical accounts as proof for the bibical accounts
4) a weird double standard where only eyewitness accounts are valid for pre-historic/human events, yet none required for god's deeds.
P0weredByPie 2 months ago
@P0weredByPie haha, that is so true :)
AtheistScientific 2 months ago
I do love how thinking rationally for one minute can show how totally stupid these Creationist prats are. What's even better, is they are sat, right now, reading this very comment, ON A COMPUTER (or smartphone) which was developed, not by God, but by science. They're very presence in these debates is hypocritical.
enormousderek 3 months ago
Hovind's theory is not only rejected by scientists but also some young earth creationist too.
WHICH makes me think that this is (AGAIN) yet another attemp at a diffrent impression of how bible.
Basically a foundation for a new (christian and of course money -making) religion
PROTOGgouki 3 months ago
I laugh at creationists. HAHAHAHAHAHA.
AtheistScientific 3 months ago
@AtheistScientific Your name is oxymoronic. There is no such thing as Atheistic Science, or evolutionary biologist or evolutionary scientist. Nobody saw or sees mindless and lifeless raw elements collaborating to contrive biological life i.e. the alleged common ancestor of all or its transmutation into all the life forms that ever lived. One cannot have science/knowledge about things that are imagined/presumed to have happened.
The atheism is moronic and based on ignorance about the truth.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 3 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN the only reason I have this name is because youtube wouldn't give me ScientificAtheist. which I wanted since I like science and am an atheist, but I guess you are one of those who just "knows" immediatly. How can you parade "truth" if your argument is that nobody saw what happens. in order to make it the truth it has to be observed and proven, not fantasized into existence. by other words. your argument is Oxymoronic.
AtheistScientific 3 months ago
@AtheistScientific Your nickname would remain oxymoronic if it was ScientificAtheist. The scientific method of enquiry can only occur in a world which is created logically with order such that things happen occurring to commands/rules/instructions the design put into all things created i.e. a superior intelligence is needed we call GOD. God is Truth and the author of truth and does not lie; He is the eyewitness to all that He created. Adam is a witness to animals God made for him to name etc.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN No it wouldn't, use your head. And to say Adam witnessed it is bullshit. Adam is made up like mickey mouse. even the vatican, the foremost authority of catholism acknowledges that. And the world isnt logically created. life just evolved and adapted so it would appear that the earth is perfectly suited for just us. Tell me, do you believe in unicorns too?
AtheistScientific 2 months ago
@AtheistScientific I used my head. Atheism is a position from ignorance and arrogance to deny what you cannot since you do not have all knowledge. You do not realize that you cannot conduct science i.e. the study of God's creation using your God given sense and brains unless the world was created with order, purpose, function etc. A chaotic world in continual change by happenstance is one that science cannot be conducted since events are not dependably repeating. DUH.
Adam is real with eyes.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN you make the mistake of thinking that Atheism trusts in science. to be an atheist just mean that we dont believe in a god. not because we can prove there isn't a god. but because you can't prove there is. you didnt answer my question. do you believe in unicorns?
And another question which I think is yes. Do you believe in the bibles story about adams creation to be 100% true and that it is logical?
AtheistScientific 2 months ago
@AtheistScientific I believe insects and animals do have centrally located horns/corns, however, the Unicorn you have in your imagination is not Biblical. It is a flying horse with a sharp point metal horn. DUH
The Bible is not full of any stories/fables; it is an eyewitness account of events, peoples and places which Archaeologist keep finding artifacts and structure to confirm it. All the evidence points to a special onetime creation by a superior intelligence/God and a catastrophic judgment.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN allright, send me a list of these alledged proofs.
AtheistScientific 2 months ago
@AtheistScientific If you can search the web you can find the Archaeological evidence that supports the Biblical claims about peoples places and events.
I will give you one source to help you. christiananswers . net/archaeology/home . html
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN oh, and why didnt you comment on the genesis contradictions
AtheistScientific 2 months ago
Comment removed
deckard9757 2 months ago
@AtheistScientific Oh, really, what contradiction; you did not stipulate? If you will, first define what a contradiction is, then give me the passage in full context, then the alleged contradiction and why? Otherwise SHUT UP if YOU WILL NOT PUT UP.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN before I humiliate you by referring you to your ridiculous comment concerning "god's enzymes" I want to answer the following:
1. By what authority and with what evidence do you judge me to be EVIL?
2. Stipulate exactly what LIES I've told.
I can't wait for the reply to this!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 Do you promulgate the pseudoscientific fairy tale lies of Evolution from pond scum to you by mindless and lifeless raw elements that collaborated by happenstance with the hero a lot of time which is only imagined and never directly observed, tested, document or reproduced as the scientific method requires? YES YOU DO. This is an evil lie that defrauds God of His Glory as the Creator. Therefore, this is your lie which makes you EVIL.
This answers questions 1 & 2.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN HA! HA! HA! "Which is only imagined and never directly observed," As was creation as the Tablet 1 referred to by P J Wiseman doesn't exist! Now answer the rest of my questions LOSER!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 The original tablets, may not exist, however, the book of Genesis compiled by Moses was based on the text of the original autographs on stone or clay or Leather that Moses received from his people during the Exodus from Egypt. I answered your questions. Specify which question instead of making lame useless comments. Do you want to continue to face palm and look like an anti-intellectual? Who saw, tested, documented and can reproduce pond scum to you evolution? NOBODY & UNSCIENTIFIC!
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN HA! HA! HA! you FAILED to mention anything other than clay tablets as you've failed to state which comment you're referring to!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "eyewitness accounts" of a "flying horse with a sharp metal horn"? HA! HA! HA! For how many hours a day do you practice being that stupid?. As you so full of illogical shit, where did the water come from to raise sea levels to cover all the land masses? You see, as it's already an established fact that if all the ice on Earth was converted into liquid form it would raise global sea levels by 20ft and our water cycle is a closed system where did the remaining 28000ft come from?
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 the BIG MORON. The mountains that exist today were not those in Noah's day. The highest mountains have marine fossils on them which means they were near sea level when sediments and marine creatures were swept on to land by the Global Flood which had gigantic tsunamis resulting from the foundations of the great deep breaking up. The mid-Atlantic ridge clearly shows magma the oozed out to displace water and cause radiating tsunamis. Ocean levels have risen more than 200ft by ice melt
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN " The mountains that exist today were not those in Noah's day." HA! HA! HA! So the entire Himalayas Rose up 20000ft + in a few thousand years which means that the Indian sub-continent must have hit the Eurasian landmass like a speedboat! However, you don't believe in fossils so why are you using them in your argument? That said, as the sea level limit is restricted to 20ft where did the remainder come from? "Ocean levels have risen more than 200ft by ice melt" LIES! Evidence?
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 That is correct that mountains were raised very quickly, otherwise there would not be marine fossil atop of all the high mountains. Fossils are evidence of the Global Flood; therefore, STOP LYING by saying I do not believe in fossils. I SAID EVIL EVOLUTIONISM AND UG DOES NOT MAKE FOSSILS AND SEDIMENTARY FOSSILIFERROUS LAYERS, WHICH MEANS THAT EVIL EVOLUTIONISM CANNOT HIJACK THIS EVIDENCE FOR ITS FAIRY TALE CLAIMS.
You can Google costal villages/cities that are submerged.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN come on, fuckwit, you've "cast the first stone", justify yourself! Tick, tock ...
deckard9757 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN as you think I lied about the synthesis of RNA and YouTube won't allow me to post the reference I've messaged it to you. Maybe they're all LIARS! HA! HA! HA!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 The synthesis of RNA as I said; Life was not made, the tinkering involved existing biological material and human intelligence to make this work unnatural and not materialistic. DUH I highlighted excerpted for the PM message I gave you to read several times since it is not sinking into you cement head.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "The Bible is not full of any stories/fables; it is an eyewitness account of events, peoples and places which Archaeologist keep finding artifacts and structure to confirm it." HA! HA! HA! Really? Evidence please.
After you've replied to my earlier comments of course ...
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 the NUMB NUT that cannot research the web.
"The Bible is not full of any stories/fables; it is an eyewitness account of events, peoples and places which Archaeologist keeps finding artifacts and structure to confirm it." HA! HA! HA! Really? Evidence please.
Here you go MORON christiananswers . net/archaeology/home . html
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN quote the "evidence" for your ridiculous comment on the raising of sea levels by 200ft during Noah's flood and the creation of the Himalayas in only a few thousand years. Next you can provide evidence that there were no land masses higher than your quoted 200ft at the time of this supposed flood and why there is no evidence anywhere on this planet it ever occurred.
This'll be good ....!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 the EVIL LYING ATHEIST. I did not say "the raising of sea levels by 200ft during Noah's flood and the creation of the Himalayas in only a few thousand years. and ... there were no land masses higher than your quoted 200ft at the time of this supposed flood ". You are such a typical dumb Brit. You can just copy and paste them to avoid making these fallacious Straw man arguments. THE RISE IN THE SEA LEVEL AFTER THE PEAK OF THE ICE AGE BY GLACIAL MELT WAS MORE THAN 200 FEET. DUH
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN HA! HA! HA! Is LYING your hobby? Here are your quotes "Ocean levels have risen more than 200ft by ice melt" and " The mountains that exist today were not those in Noah's day." "THE RISE IN THE SEA LEVEL AFTER THE PEAK OF THE ICE AGE BY GLACIAL MELT WAS MORE THAN 200 FEET. DUH" HA! HA! HA! You really are so fucking stupid - ice ages cause the sea levels to fall not rise!! HA! HA! HA!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 I TOLD YOU TO GOOGLE COSTAL VILLAGES SUBMERGED, WHICH YOU DID NOT BOTHER TO. A SUBMERGED COSTAL VILLAGE IN THE GLOBAL FLOOD/ICE AGE EPOCH MODEL FITS PERFECTLY I.E. AFTER THE GLOBAL FLOOD AND AFTER THE ICE AGE THAT ENSUED DELIVERED OCEAN WATERS TO THE POLES TO BECOME THE GLACIERS, AND AFTER IT’S PEAK BUT BEFORE THE GLACIAL MELT, THE SETTLEMENTS ON THE COAST WERE ESTABLISHED. AFTER THE HUMAN HABITATS EXISTED THE GLACIAL MELT RAISED THE SEA LEVEL TO SUBMERGE THE SETTLEMENTS. DUH
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN careful with your capitals - anger has detrimental affects on blood pressure! As for your "coastal submerged village" crap - HA! HA! HA! " A SUBMERGED COSTAL VILLAGE IN THE GLOBAL FLOOD/ICE AGE EPOCH MODEL FITS PERFECTLY" fits what? Explain. Although I doubt you can. "AFTER THE GLOBAL FLOOD AND AFTER THE ICE AGE THAT ENSUED" HA! HA! HA! The last ICE AGE hasn't finished yet, you idiot! Perhaps you mean "Glacial Period"? That finished 12500 years ago.
MUPPET!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 THE EVIL LYING BRITISH ATHEIST. The site shows sea levels increased 140 meters! DUH wattsupwiththat . com/2010/12/01/sea-level-rise-jumpy-after-last-ice-age/
This site shows sea levels increased 120 meters! DUH giss . nasa.gov/research/briefs/gornitz_09/
Did you bother to Google submerged villages which had to be settled before the Glacial Melt since the Global Flood that precipitated the Ice Age that lowered the sea levels? I pay no regard to Atheistic dating methods & terms.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "The site shows sea levels increased 140 meters!" HA! HA! HA! And they means it happened globally does it?! They're nothing more than isolated events! If you want to LIE then choose a different subject!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 HTBK>"The site shows sea levels increased 140 meters!"
The numb nut Brit said "HA! HA! HA! And they means it happened globally does it?! They're nothing more than isolated events!" Which is a typical bare assertion fallacy that illogical anti-intellectual Atheists use. The EVIL LYING ATHEIST then said "If you want to LIE then choose a different subject!" Now this numb nut Brit is projecting himself as some authority. YOU HAVE NOTHING BUT WORTHLESS TRIPE TO OFFER.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN provide the evidence that your quoted events are reflected globally. That will of course require you to demonstrate where the additional water came from (Hovind's meteor perhaps?), where the global mass biocide layer is situated, how animals on other continents swam thousands of miles without food or freshnwater to reach the "ark" and evidence of how Noah's family produced black, indian and oriental sub-types in a few thousand years .
This'll be funny ....!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757
MORE STRAW MAN FALLACIES FROM AN ANTI-INTELLECTUAL EVIL LYING ATHEIST
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN HA! HA! HA! "MORE FALLACIES", state them and your evidence that they are. Then, once you've apologized for this LIE perhaps you'll apologize for for your errors concerning the gospel discrepancies regarding the "birth" of Jesus, your inability to count in multiples of a thousand regarding the age of your supposed "biblical" tablets from Mesopotamia "signed" by Adam, your ignorance of plate tectonics and the origin and age of the Himalayas!
This is too easy!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 THE EVIL LYING BRITISH ATHEIST. SINCE YOU DO NOT KNOW THE GLOBAL FLOOD/ICE EPOCH MODEL, WHEN YOU MISREPRESENT THIS MODEL YOU COMMIT THE STRAW MAN, AND BARE ASSERTION FALLACIES. DUH.
THE GOSPEL DOES NOT TELL US THE BIRTH DATE OF JESUS. DUH.
THE BIBLICAL TABLETS ARE NOT FROM MESOPOTAMIA; RATHER THE TOLEDOTH PRACTICE IS CONFIRMED AND SUPPORTS THE GENESIS ACCOUNT AND ITS USE OF TOLEDOTHS. DUH
YOU DO NOT KNOW THE AGE OF ANYTHING OR PLATE TECTONICS. DUH
THAT’S 4 FACE PALMS THIS TIME.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Hi Kathy! Here we go again, BLAH! BLAH! BLAH! It's already established that the available water on Earth exists in a closed system and that if all the ice melted it would raise global sea levels by 20ft! So I'll ask you again where did the remaining water come from to destroy all life on Earth? " THE BIBLICAL TABLETS ARE NOT FROM MESOPOTAMIA" HA! HA! HA! Yes they are, and by thway no-one including theologians buy into your toledoth version of ancient history!
YOU LOSE AGAIN!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 THE BRITISH EXPERT FACE PALMER. I GAVE YOU 2 WEB SITES SUPPORTING 120 METERS OF GLACIAL MELT, ONE THEM BEING NASA. FACE PALMER!
THE CLOSED SYSTEM OF THE EARTH CONTAINS ALL THE WATER NECESSARY TO FLOOD THE EARTH; IF, ALL THE MOUNTAINS WERE USED TO FILL ALL THE DEEP OCEAN VALLEYS TO MAKE IT SMOOTH, THERE WOULD BE ABOUT 2 MILES OF WATER COVERING IT. THE OPINIONS OF THEOLOGIANS IS IRRELEVANT WITH RESPECT TO THE BIBLICAL TEXT THAT USES TOLEDOTHS BEFORE MESOPOTAMIANS. DUH FACE PALM.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN " I GAVE YOU 2 WEB SITES SUPPORTING 120 METERS OF GLACIAL MELT, ONE THEM BEING NASA." HA! HA! HA! Neither of which even mention a global flood or relate their findings to such a ridiculous concept!
WRONG AGAIN!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 THE TOTAL MORON.
THE SITES YOU WERE GIVEN WAS TO SHOW THAT SEA LEVELS HAVE RISEN SUFFICIENTLY TO SUBMERGE COSTAL VILLAGES WHICH CONFIRMS THE ICE EPOCH THAT ENSUED THE GLOBAL FLOOD. FOR COSTAL VILLAGES TO BE SUBMERGED, THE VILLAGES HAD TO BE FOUNDED BEFORE THE GLACIAL MELT. THE SITES I GAVE YOU SUPPORT A RISE OF 120 METERS.
IT IS IRRELEVANT THAT THE ATHEIST ORGANIZATION, NASA, DOES NOT CORRELATE THE SEA LEVEL RISE TO THE WATER DISPLACED TO THE POLES DURING THE GLOBAL FLOOD. DUH
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "THE SITES YOU WERE GIVEN WAS TO SHOW THAT SEA LEVELS HAVE RISEN SUFFICIENTLY TO SUBMERGE COSTAL VILLAGES WHICH CONFIRMS THE ICE EPOCH THAT ENSUED THE GLOBAL FLOOD." HA! HA! HA! No they don't! where is your NASA evidence? Yet more LIES from the PARENTAL FAILURE!
NIGHT NIGHT!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN ""EVOLUTION DOES NOT MAKE FOSSILIFERROUS SEDIMENTARY LAYERS.2 HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! You said this yesterday, the comment is there for all to see!"
Are you going to admit that you LIED?
Or are you too much of a coward?
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 HOW STUPID ARE YOU? I SAID THAT I SAID "EVOLUTION DOES NOT MAKE FOSSILIFERROUS SEDIMENTARY LAYERS" AND I STAND BY IT.
YOU CANNOT READ AND YOU ARE AN EVIL LYING ATHEIST.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN HA! HA! HA! You stand by it do you? So evolution causes death and geological deposition, does it?
FAILURE!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 THE FACE PALMER EXTRAORDINAIRE.
I SAID FOR THE XX TIME "EVOLUTION >>>>DOES NOT<<<<< MAKE FOSSILIFERROUS SEDIMENTARY LAYERS.
DO YOU UNDERSTAND LITTLE BOY? HAS YOUR LEFT HAND BEEN INTRODUCED TO YOUR RIGHT HAND?
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Tick, tock .....
deckard9757 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "THE GOSPEL DOES NOT TELL US THE BIRTH DATE OF JESUS. DUH." HA! HA! HA! You said that they do! According to you the gospels are "eyewitness accounts". So explain how, as I've asked you countless times, how Matthew and Luke's "accounts" are at least 10 years apart!
Tick, tock ....
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 the nitwit Brit.
Provide the verses with the dates you claim exist and your math to show there is a 10 year gap. PUT UP OR SHUT UP MORON.
YOUTUBE FOLKS; GET READY FOR ANOTHER FACE PALM BY BRITAIN'S FINEST FACE PALMER deckard9757
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN fucking hell, how many times do I have to repeat this simple example of grammar?
MATT 2 :1 "NOW WHEN JESUS WAS BORN IN BETHLEHEM OF JUDEA IN THE DAYS OF HEROD THE KING" (who died in 4BCE).
LUKE 2: 1 - 2 "AND IT CAME TO PASS IN THOSE DAYS, THAT THERE WENT OUT A DECREE FROM CAESAR AUGUSTUS THAT ALL THE WORLD SHOULD BE TAXED. AND THIS TAXING WAS FIRST MADE WHEN CYRENIUS WAS GOVENOR OR SYRIA" (Which occurred in 6CE).
10 years difference, idiot. Now explain.
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 the MORON. As I pointed out, the Biblical text does not give us the birth date of Jesus. You are using extra-biblical dates assigned by sources outside of the Biblical text. You do not know when 1BC/1AD junction occurred. The Biblical text only tell us that Herod was still King when Jesus was born and that Mary and Joseph went to Bethlehem to register based on degree that first began when Cyrenius was Governor of Syria and continued by a decree from Caesar Augustus. DUH face palm.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "You are using extra-biblical dates assigned by sources outside of the Biblical text". HA! HA! HA! That's right, fuckwit, I'm using hard archaeological evidence that's beyond dispute. Don't try to worm your way out of the howling errors you've made by trying that old chestnut again!
deckard9757 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@deckard9757 who is without logic and without discernment and cannot read the Bible said "I'm using hard archaeological evidence that's beyond dispute." What archaeological evidence establishes the birth date of Jesus, the junction of 1BC/1AD, and the death of Herod? PUT UP OR SHUT UP. As I pointed out, the Biblical text does not give us the birth date of Jesus.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Oh dear, you really are incapable of rational thought aren't you? The junction is immaterial, there is a 10 year gap between the death of Herod the Great and Quirinius becoming Governor of Syria. By the way there is no evidence whatsoever that Caesar Augustus ordered a census involving the indigenous populations around that time (don't quote Josephus, it's already recognised as bullshit) and no Roman census ever required the Jews to register in their tribal capitals.
YOU LOSE!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 the nitwit BRIT. To establish the Birth date of Jesus the junction of 1BC/1AD is relevant since there is an error of several years. THE PROVEN LIAR IS YOU, AN EVIL LYING ATHEIST. Josephus is a credible historian and you are an incredible evil lying atheist. The Bible is historically accurate; archaeological evidence continues to confirm its accuracy.
How long would it take to conduct a census in the ancient world where communication is by word of mouth, letter, etc.?
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN HA! HA! HA! You are so truly stupid! I wasn't establishing the "birth" of Jesus (as I stated if you could read properly). I was successfully discrediting the accuracy of your "eyewitness" gospel accounts! Do you want me to draw you a diagram and send it to you? Herod the Great did not die in the same year as Quirinius became Governor of Syria therefore one or both of the gospels of Matthew and Luke are wrong! Something you should be used to!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 THE EVIL LYING ATHEIST. YOU CERTAINLY DID BEGIN SOME 2 WKS AGO TRYING TO SHOW THAT THE BIRTH DATE OF JESUS DID NOT AGREE BETWEEN LUKE AND MATTHEW. THE PROBLEM IS THAT YOU WERE FORCING ON THE TEXT DATES ASSIGNED BY EXTRA-BIBLICAL SOURCES ON PERSONS MENTIONED I.E. HEROD THE KING, AND "QUIRINIUS BECAME GOVERNOR OF SYRIA" TO QUOTE YOUR GOOF. JESUS WAS NOT BORN THE DAY HEROD DIED, & THE CENSUS BEGAN WITH QUIRINIUS, HOWEVER, MARY & JOSEPH GO TO BETHLEHEM UNDER THE AUGUSTAN DECREE. DUH
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "TRYING TO SHOW THAT THE BIRTH DATE OF JESUS DID NOT AGREE BETWEEN LUKE AND MATTHEW" HA! HA! HA! No I didn't, as I stipulated yesterday and the day before! Your supposed 'confusion' cannot be disguised - you're simply a LIAR!
1 "JESUS WAS NOT BORN THE DAY HEROD DIED" I didn't say he was. LIE No. 1.
2 "THE CENSUS BEGAN WITH QUIRINIUS" There was no census. LIE No. 2.
3 "UNDER THE AUGUSTAN DECREE" There was no decree, as there was no census! LIE No. 3.
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 the British Reprobate.
1 "JESUS WAS NOT BORN THE DAY HEROD DIED" I didn't say he was. LIE No. 1. < I did not say you did; I only made a statement because you did not indicate what date Jesus was born? When before Herod's death was Jesus born? Duh. As for your bare assertion fallacies for your points 2 and 3, your opinion is worthless; I do not respect your opinion on any matter. How old are you? Where you there 2000 years ago?
Read biblestudymanuals . net/Jesus_birthdate . htm
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Your attempts at distraction are pitiful. I'll ask you yet again. Herod the Great did not die (Matt 2:1) in the same year as Qurinius became Governor of Syria (Luke 2: 2) and yet botn are used by the said authors of the year in which Jesus was "born". You have stated repeatedly that both are "eyewitness accounts". Now, explain how this can be the case when clearly one or both accounts are wrong.
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 the cement head. The Biblical text only tells us that King Herod was still alive and that the census was decreed and nothing more. The Bible does not give a birthday for Jesus. DUH
Mat 2:1..."Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king". Luke 2:1-2..."in those days that a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered. This census first took place while Quirinius was governing Syria"
You need your own dates validated???
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "The Biblical text only tells us that King Herod was still alive and that the census was decreed and nothing more". And that's why it's WRONG! Because Herod was dead when the Quirinius became Governor of Syria and Augustus supposedly decreed the imaginary census. Congratulations, you've just proved yourself wrong! To help embarrass you still further I'd like you to provide credible evidence that any Roman census required the Jews to register in their tribal home town.
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 the royal ignoramus: "The Biblical text only tells us that King Herod was still alive and that the census was decreed and nothing more".
You need to establish that your assumptions are correct before you can impose your version of history on the Biblical Text to claim there is a contradiction. DUH. You are not arguing from the text, you are using the opinions of critics against the text. The Bible does not tell us the Birthdate of Jesus.
When will you clue in?
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN ""The Biblical text only tells us that King Herod was still alive and that the census was decreed and nothing more". HA! HA! HA! No it doesn't. Why are you LYINH? Quote the verses that support this.
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 the Brit with a concrete head.
I already quoted the relevant versus.
Now provide the Brithdate that you claim the Bible gives for the Birthdate of Jesus. PUT UP OR SHUT UP MORON
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "4BCE and 6CE. Matt 2:1 and Luke 2:1-2, and as you're clearly a 'hard of thinking' case I'll point it out for you - Herod died in 4BCE and Cyrenius became governor of Syria in 6CE."
Admit that you were wrong!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 the MORON is avoiding my point. THE BIBLE DOES NOT TELL US WHAT DATE JESUS WAS BORN; IT DOES NOT USE 4BCE OR 6BCE IN Matt 2:1 & Luke 2:1-2. YOU ARE USING EXTRA-BIBLICAL SOURCES FOR DATES THAT ARE NOT ACCURATELY ESTABLISHED TO FALLACIOUSLY CREATE A PERIOD THAT THE BIBLE DID NOT STIPULATE. IS YOUR DEBATE WITH THE EXTRA-BIBLICAL REFERENCE MATERIAL AND THE DATES THE WRITERS ALLEGE? YES IT IS.
GET AN EDUCATION ON LOGIC AND WHAT IT FALLACIOUS SO THE YOU CAN END YOUR CONSTANT USE OF IT.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN ""This makes the oldest writings of Genesis 6000 years old or 4000BC numb nut." HA! HA! HA! But as I stated they're not from 4000BCE! More LIES! "You must be a numb nut American" HA! HA! You already know I'm British - as your earlier ridiculous xenophobic remarks demonstrated - so why LIE again?!"
Admit that you were wrong!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 THE BRITISH NUMB NUT THAT LOVES TO FACE PALM.
HTBK >"This makes the oldest writings of Genesis 6000 years old or 4000BC numb nut."
THE BRIT SAID "HA! HA! HA! But as I stated they're not from 4000BCE!" YOU ARE ENDLESSLY USING YOUR WORTHLESS OPINION IN YOUR ARGUMENTS. YOU CAN STATE WHAT YOU WANT ALL DAY LONG; YOUR STATEMENTS REMAIN WORTHLESS TRIPE.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN HA! HA! HA! You're even too stupid to admit when you're wrong! Tell me, as the most recent mass biocide layer dates from 65 million years ago and demonstrates the extinction of the dinosaurs (it's called the Yucatan Impact by the way) how could they possibly co-exist with humans? You do realise that "The Flinstones" is a cartoon and not a documentary series don't you? Where is yourv evidence for a flying horse with a metal horn?
You're such an EMBARRASSMENT to your family!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 A TOTAL NIT WIT AND A BRIT.
UG AND EVOLUTION DOES NOT MAKE FOSSILIFERROUS SEDIMENTARY LAYERS. THE BIOMASS IN OIL, COAL, NG AND DINOSAUR TISSUE ALL CONTAIN C14 WHICH INDICATES LESS THAN 50,000 YEARS OLD USING THE BOGUS RADIOMETRIC DATING GAMES. THE YUCATAN IMPACT HAS FALLEN AS AN ALLEGED EXTINCTION EVENT FOR THE DINOS DON'T YOU KNOW? POND SCUM TO YOU EVOLUTION NEVER HAPPENED, OR HAPPENS AND CANNOT HAPPEN IN DEFIANCE OF THE APPLICABLE LAWS & PRINCIPLES OF SCIENCE. DUH YOU FAIL!
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "EVOLUTION DOES NOT MAKE FOSSILIFERROUS SEDIMENTARY LAYERS." HA! HA! HA! No-one said it did, fuckwit (BTW "nitwit" is all one word)! Yet another LIE! Death and geology create fossils, stupid. Did you ever attend a real school or one run by Kent Hovind? " DINOSAUR TISSUE ALL CONTAIN C14 WHICH INDICATES LESS THAN 50,000 YEARS" HA! HA! HA! Dinosaur and all fossils are dated using rubidium/strontium, thorium/lead, potassium/argon, argon/argon, or uranium/lead, not C14> MORE LIES!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 I DID NOT SAY YOU SAID "EVOLUTION DOES NOT MAKE FOSSILIFERROUS SEDIMENTARY LAYERS." I SAID THIS & IT'S A FACT, THEREFORE, EVIL EVOLUTIONISM CANNOT USE FOSSILS AS EVIDENCE FOR EVIL EVOLUTIONISM AND IT CANNOT USE SEDIMENTARY LAYERS TO CLAIM THAT IT IS A CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD OF CHANGE OVER DEEP TIME; FOR ALL THE FLORA AND FAUNA WAS BURIED QUICKLY BY WATER BORN SEDIMENT ON A GLOBAL SCALE TO CREATE THE FOSSIL RECORD & GRAVEYARDS BEFORE DECAY. ALL BIOLOGICAL TISSUES HAVE MEASURABLE C14.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "EVOLUTION DOES NOT MAKE FOSSILIFERROUS SEDIMENTARY LAYERS.2 HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! You said this yesterday, the comment is there for all to see!
YET MORE LIES!
HA! HA! HA! HA!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 Are you well? I think you need medical attention. You are losing it. This comment agrees with what I claimed yesterday and now you are making statements as if I did not make the statement.
Get mental attention, or give it a rest.
Jesus loves you
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "As if you did not make them". So you did then! Who needs medication?
deckard9757 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN goodnight FOOL!
deckard9757 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN HA! HA! HA! I can count. Why can't you?!
deckard9757 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN goodnight fuckwit!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN therefore as recent glacial melts only account for 30% and as previously stated the release of all ice cap melt water would raise global sea levels by a mere 20ft, the amount available for your imaginary "global flood" could at best have raised sea levels by a paltry 6ft!
I hope that you don't have any children, you must be a real embarrassment to them.
HOW PATHETIC AND UNEDUCATED!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 the uneducated nitwit Brit. The Global Flood recorded by the eyewitness, Noah, was about 4300 years ago with the ice age ensuing to move water off the Earth to the poles to expose land. How much ice would be needed to raise the sea level by 120 meters in the past 4000 years or so? The amount of water remaining at the poles to be melted may be as you say 20 feet. What does this have to do with the ice that covered all of Canada and parts of northern USA?
Britain's are not wise.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN HA! HA! HA! Is the education system in Canada so poor? Can't you even grasp a concept of such logical and evidential simplicity that it's understood by children? If your Judaic camp fire folklore were true why is there no mass biocide layer that resulted from it?
IT'S BECAUSE YOU'RE a LIAR!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 THE TOTAL MORON. THE BIOMASS THAT DIED IN THE GLOBAL FLOOD IS EVIDENTIAL ALL OVER THE WORLD I.E. IN THE FOSSIL RECORD, IN THE COAL, GAS/NG FIELDS, POLYSTRATE FOSSILS ETC.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "THE BIOMASS THAT DIED IN THE GLOBAL FLOOD IS EVIDENTIAL ALL OVER THE WORLD" HA! HA! HA! And where are the human remains FAILURE?
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 the nitwit BRIT! The humans are in the Oil/NG and possibly fossil undiscovered. It was God’s intention to destroy the vile humanity which may have been so thorough.
Where are all the human skeletons/fossils of the past 1 million years of your fairy tale story of EVIL Evolutionism?
The bogus evidence of human evolution is so little it fits on a billiard table.
RUN MORON RUN FROM ANOTHER FACE PALM. DUH
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "Where are all the human skeletons/fossils of the past 1 million years of your fairy tale story of EVIL Evolutionism?" HA! HA! HA! Read 'em and weep you ignorant moose-fucking blert;
Homo Erectus - Indonesia, Spain, China, Algeria, Ethiopia, Greece
homo Heidelgergensis - UK, Spain, Italy, Ethiopia, Germany, Tanzania, Morocco, South Africa, France
Homo Neanderthalensis - UK, Germany, Greece, Israel, Croatia, France, Italy, Belgium
Homo Sapiens - cemeteries.
ALL TOO EASY LOSER!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 the nitwit Brit. Whatever locations you list for the evidence of humans was not the issue. DUH. The issue is quantity. If your fairy tale evolutionism occurred over a million years and the Global Flood of Noah did not happen, there should be innumerable skeletons of humans as well as transitional forms. However, the bogus evidence occupies but a billiard table. WOW not much for a million years of imagined evolution.
YOU CONTINUALLY FAIL TO GRASP THE ISSUE AND STAY ON TOPIC. DUH
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "Where are all the human skeletons/fossils of the past 1 million years of your fairy tale story of EVIL Evolutionism?" "Whatever locations you list for the evidence of humans was not the issue." HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! So now you're changing the goalposts, how PATHETIC!
"There should be innumerable skeletons of humans as well as transitional forms" HA! HA! HA! How fucking stupid can you get? Ever thought why we're not 10ft deep in remains? Scavengers and decay FUCKWIT!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 THE MORON AND EVIL LYING ATHEIST. THIS ISSUE STARTED WITH YOU WANTING TO KNOW WHAT HAPPEN TO ALL THE BIOMASS & HUMANS THAT DIED IN THE GLOBAL FLOOD. I SAID IT IS THE COAL, OIL/NG FIELDS AND FOSSIL RECORD. THE MASS OF HUMANS BEING IN THE OIL/NG AND UNDISCOVERED FOSSILS AS THE REASON FOR THE VERY FEW FOSSILS FOUND SINCE THE GLOBAL FLOOD ABOUT 4300 YEARS AGO. THE VERY FEW HUMAN FOSSILS IS A BIGGER PROBLEM FOR THE ALLEGED MILLIONS OF YEARS OF EVOLUTION. SO WHAT ANSWERS DO YOU LIKE?
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@deckard9757
Homo habilis >Junk category mixing some human and some ape fossils
ergaster/erectus/Ardipithecus, Pierolapithecus catalaunicus, Ramapithecus, Australopithecus afarensis/africanus/boisei/robustus >Extinct ape
Pan troglodytes & Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla and Gorilla beringei, Pongo pygmaeus and Pongo abelii (orangutan) >Living ape
Homo floresiensis, Cro-Mgnon, Neanderthalensis/Heidelbergensis/sapiens >Human
Liar; no transitional forms. God made them fully formed & functional
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "Homo habilis >Junk category mixing some human and some ape fossils"HA! HA! HA! Wrong on every count! Where's your evidence for these re-categorisations?
This'll be good...
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 REGARDING ""Homo habilis >Junk category mixing some human and some ape fossils"HA! HA! HA! Wrong on every count! Where's your evidence for these re-categorisations?"
READ trueorigin . org/skull1470 . asp
FOR THE MISREPRESENTATIONS
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "READ trueorigin . org/skull1470 . asp" I have. It's all ignorant opinion. As I requested yesterday EVIDENCE please.
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 HA Ha Ha thanks for the hardy chuckle. Your comment, "I have. It's all ignorant opinion." to my web reference "trueorigin . org/skull1470 . asp" was so laughable. You are not an authority on anything except EVIL LIES. If you did read the material you would be aware of the issues and misrepresentation.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN I'm so pleased that I helped put a little happiness into your sad and angry life! Nevertheless the website you quoted contains nothing but unsustantiated opinion and is therefore inconsequential.
At least we both had a laugh at its expense!
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 the ignoramus. You could not of READ trueorigin . org/skull1470 . asp , but if you did, you obviously did not comprehend the information provided.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN I'm still waiting for the credible scientific evidence for your re-classification of the hominids I listed yesterday....
Tick, tock ...
deckard9757 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN any chance you can furnish me with credible scientific evidence for the comments that you've avoided answering so far, such as
1. the existence of a flying horse with a metal horn
2. A 6 day creation
3. Human/dinosaur co-existence
4. A global flood
5. The creation of the Himalayas in less than 6000 years
6. How life on other continents swam thousands of miles without food or fresh water to reach the ark
7. Where the required flood water came from.
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 the Moron. Are you switching subjects? Regarding your questions:
1-Not Biblical.
2-God, the creator and eyewitness of the creation make the claim of the 6 day creation which is found in the book of Genesis.
3-The Biblical book of Job describes two very large creatures that no longer exist which are dinosaurs
4-Noah, the eyewitness of the Global Flood documented the event in the book of Genesis
5-Mountain building is part of the Global Flood model the Noah documented.
cont.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN HA! HA! HA! I asked for credible evidence not folklore! I'll leave you to compile it. Goodnight.
deckard9757 2 months ago
@deckard9757 Regarding your questions, a continuation for the British Moron:
6-According to the eyewitness account from Noah, God sent the animals to Noah to board the Ark. The Global Flood model considers the land masses united without the mid-Atlantic ridge that separated the Americas and without the current mountain ranges.
7-We have agreement that all the water is part of Earth's closed system. Any kind of addition from outer space would be minor if it occurred.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 months ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "The Global Flood model considers the land masses united without the mid-Atlantic ridge that separated the Americas and without the current mountain ranges." HA! HA! HA! And the credible source of this information is from where?
deckard9757 2 months ago