@sweetpea16969 I'll give Mark Blitz credit for finding this. He deserves the credit. But as for understanding? Nah, forget it. If you understood, you never would follow a false messiah in the first place. If G-d thinks you guys rate hanging around His universe, He'll Teach you - with the kinds of Tools not available to mere mortals like me. If not, it was nice meeting you.
Just stick with the Jewish stuff here; cut out all the Christian baloney. Sukkot and PessaH are holidays that deal with the Divine Redemption of Israel. These events in 5708, and 5727, respectively, were major events dealing with the re-establishment of Jewish (and eventually Hebrew) rule over Israel. The events that are likely to occur in 5773 or 5774 will bring about a major furtherance in the establishment of a OUR rule here in Israel and a shift in the way you non-Hebrews view us.
The Divine Placeholders used in the Greek text to represent the Ma'aseyah were based upon Chrestus, not Christos, we find a perfect match. Both words convey the same message:
Yahowsha' is Yah's "Useful Implement," His "Upright Servant," who does "Good, Moral, and Beneficial Work." And that is better than being "Christ/Drugged." It is therefore reasonable for us to conclude that Yahowah assigned the title Ma'aseyah to Yahowsha'.
Recognizing that mala'kah is based upon mal'ak (errant angel)", which is "a spiritual being,
God's servant, a theophanic manifestation tasked with the job of delivering the heavenly
message," it becomes evident that we are being asked not to do the work of the Ma'aseyah, because He is the "Implement Yahowah has Tasked to Do His Work." In other words: Yah can save us, but we cannot save ourselves. This is important, ARY, so I can show you that Gods Word stands for all time. His Covenant.
Ma'aseyah helps illuminate Yahowah's First Written Instruction: "Zakar/Remember the Shabat/Sabbath." After using two of Hebrew's three words for "doing work," 'abad and 'asah, (the other being ma'aseh) Yahowah asks us not to do any mala'kah on Shabat.
Ma'aseyah provides a perfect depiction of how Yahowah used Yahowsha'. As Ma'aseyah, He was "Yah's Implement, Doing the Work of Yahowah." Ma'aseyah even serves as the perfect complement to Yahowsha', whereby we are told that "Salvation is from Yah."
Every Scriptural name and title, from Isaiah to Zachariah, from Mount Moriah to the Messiah, which is transliterated "iah" today, is actually "yah" in the revealed text. Just as Qumbayah and Halaluyah speak volumes to those with an ear for Yah's Word today, so does the legacy of "iah" at the end of "Messiah."
Consider this: writing about the great fire which swept through Rome in 64 CE, the Roman historian Tacitus (the classical world's most authoritative voice) in Annals XV.44.2-8, revealed: "All human efforts…and propitiations of the gods, did not banish the sinister belief that the fire was the result of an order [from Nero].
Chrestus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilate. And a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Iudaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their center and become popular.
Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of
firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination when daylight had expired."
But there is more, the Nestle-Aland 27th Edition Greek New Testament reveals that
Chrestus (χρηστ ς) was scribed ὸ in 1 Peter 2:3, not Christos. Their references for this include Papyrus 72 and the Codex Sinaiticus, the oldest extant witnesses of Peter's (actually of Shim'own Kephas') letter.
Chrestus isn't Yahowsha's title, it is at least an apt translation of it. Chrestus
means "useful implement," and "upright servant," as well as "merciful one." It was used to"depict the good and beneficial work of a moral person." So rather than being "drugged," a Chrestucian is a "useful implement, an upright servant, and a moral person working beneficially" with Yah.
@maranathachapelTV Dear Brothers of maranathachapelTV: I need your help, under your video "Mark Biltz; Blood Moons And Solar Eclipses Part 1", I was refuting some serious errors of materialclassified, I have carefully redacted my answers to his doctrinal challenges and posted them in a fine threaded argument, only to find all my hard work flagged as spam.
@ARYZerubbabel It's not I, that's flagging your responses. I wish it would stop, but such is mans doing. Maybe it has a reason since everything which is important to Yahowah is separated and thus set apart. This then is why the Covenant was "karat –
cut through the process of separation." Most people will be excluded from Yahowah's family, because to be included, a person must first separate themselves from the world of religion and politics.
This post is only to report that my answers below carefully redacted and following a fine thread of argument were unfairly flagged as spam. I do not accuse anyone about it, but I want to report it. Important arguments about the preservation of the Word of God were hidden from the reader with that horrible "flag as spam" button.
I noticed that on the year 638 that their was a total lunar eclipse on Aug. 30th and then one on Sept. 29th. Is that rare to have a total eclipse so close to each other?
And our focus should be on Yahowah, not Yahowsha', and on the Towrah, Prophets, and Psalms, not on the Greek texts. God does the saving..Halle Lu Yah-Radiate Yahs Light.
@materialclassified So, all of we that believe in the power of God to preserve His word in the Church will embrace happily and with joy the Greek New Testament traditional texts, and will treasure it as it is THE WORD OF GOD, and will rely in it, and will focus in it, in the Gospels, in Acts, in the writing of all of the Apostles, also in Paul who extended the Church (the Christian Churches fixed the cannon, not the strangers to the Christian Church).
@materialclassified All of us, real bible believers will embrace the traditional texts that the very churches of Asia, the churches of Revelation of John, had embraced.
GLORY BE TO THE FATHER, THE SON AND THE HOLY SPIRIT.
Before I go, I just want to tell ppl that, If you invest the time, what you will learn is that there are over 300,000 known discrepancies between the Texus Receptus and the oldest manuscripts. And then there are even more translation errors - and those from a language which was itself a translation of what was actually spoken. And while the problem is devastating for Christianity, it isn't all that significant when someone has the right perspective.
@materialclassified Then you do not believe in the power of the Word of God (as if we have not perceived it of you in many forms of your discourse) to remain preserved forever, as it is written:
A real believer in the Word of God believes that the Word of God never was lost, always was present and visible, and by faith know that minor alterations of the traditional text are without consequences.
The heretics are desperate to reject the traditional texts of the New Testament and to find some old manuscript not transmitted by the Church.
So I am VERY comfortable with the Word of God and believe in the power of God keeping it IN THE CHURCH.
Surely, for those gullible ones that do not believe in the preserving power of God,it is a problem, the incredible number of discrepancies between the traditional texts and some archaeological findings of bad (not transmitted by the Church) old manuscript. It is a problem for them. Surely you, and Satan, can rejoice how the problem is "devastating for Christianity", as you say, but it is a problem for the ignorant ones, those ignoring the preserving power of God for His word.
@materialclassified Then you, and Satan, will have to suffer dismay forever because there always will remain those that understand clearly that about THE WORD OF GOD, WHICH LIVETH AND ABIDETH FOR EVER. That is to say, there is a strong portion of Christianity that is adamant in the faith that God preserve His word, and accept with faith the New Testament traditional Greek texts. So Satan and you will have to "live" with it till FOREVER.
No more Tim Tebows for today. I'll address any questions on your Sabbath, Sunday, the 1st day of the week for you christians. You will not understands Gods plan of 6 plus 1, until you, yourself come out of Urr.
Acts 11:26 And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.
Acts 26:28 Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian.
1 Peter 4:16 Yet if any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf.
ARY, I see this as a stubborn legacy of Christianity, where salvation is not only the most important thing, you are told that all you have to do is believe to be saved. And what you are asked to believe is that God died for your sins--which is an impossibility as God as spirit cannot die. As a Christian you don't have to know anything about God other than He died. Christians would then have you bow your head and repeat their sinners prayer...cont.
cont'd.... But yet how do you come to believe them unless you go to one of their meetings, read their literature, or listen to their sermons? You don't become immortal or perfect by "shamar - examining and considering" the Towrah. But by observing what the Towrah teaches, its guidance and directions, you will come to know how to receive these gifts.
It takes time to build a relationship, even with God!
Why did He use the word, "Rermember?" You think on that until Sunday.
27 Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing.
28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, MY LORD AND MY GOD.
29 Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, THOU HAST BELIEVED: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.
Ephesians 3:9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:
Colossians 1:17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
Hebrews 1:10 And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands:
@materialclassified So Jesus always was and will be God alike God the Father, of the same divine nature as His Father. Then for the redemption of those that will believe in Him and His sacrifice, the Son of God added to His person the human nature, then He became also a man, so as a man He can experience death to expiate the sins of those that will believe.
John 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
@materialclassified So, according with the Word of God, the person of Jesus Christ is of eternal existence and of the same divine nature than God the Father, and by the miraculous incarnation narrated in some of the Gospels, the same divine person of the Son added for Himself the human nature. So God the Son really died for us, it was the same divine person, in His human nature, Who experienced a real death for us.
Therefore, there are three correct choices and one incorrect option. Guess which one religious men chose? Is it any wonder Yahowsha called the Catholics "dead" and Protestants "vomit?"
Today should be your, "double portion" day. He tolds us to, "Remember His Shabat/Sabbath."
Tomorrow is Shabat, for those that actually choose Yahs promise.
@materialclassified There are many protestant individual churches that are well within a Philadelphian pattern, so your generalization on denominations is futile, and your inclusion of Catholic within the churches of Revelation is a disgrace, the Roman Church is the Harlot of Revelation, not a true church of Jesus Christ.
Tomorrow is Shabat, and Old Testament shade of the body of Jesus, the Church, the body of all those now enjoying the eternal rest of salvation.
Sorry Ary, to further indict "Christ" and "Christian," even if the tertiary definition of chriso, "anointed," were intended, that connotation still depicts the "application of a medicinal ointment or drug." And should we ignorantly and inadvisably jettison this pharmaceutical baggage, we'd still be left with other insurmountable problems.
The Scriptural evidence strongly suggests that Yahowsha's title was not "ha
Mashiach," which means "the Anointed," but instead "ha Ma'aseyah," which translates to "the Implement Doing the Work of Yahowah."Second,"ha Ma'aseyah,"as a Hebrew title, like the name Yahowsha',should have been transliterated (presented phonetically) in Greek and also English, not translated. For example,the titles Rabbi,Imam,Pharaoh,Czar,Sheik,and Pope were all transliterated,not translated.
Yahowsha' was not Greek, did not speak Greek, and did not have a Greek name or a Greek title, so to infer that He did by crudely transliterating Ieosus
Christos "Jesus Christ" is grossly misleading and completely deceptive.
Third, there is no justification for using Hellenized nomenclature when addressing a
Hebrew concept. And since Yahowsha' did not communicate in Greek, that language is nothing more than a translation of what He actually conveyed.
This would be like transliterating Genghis' "Khan" title, which means "ruler" in Mongolian, "Jinjeus Malak," because we like the letter J, the "eus" ending derived from Greek grammar, and malak has the same meaning in Hebrew. Worse, how about rendering Caesar Augustus, "Hairy August," as that is what caesar means in English. It's idiotic and just not right!
And fourth, the textual evidence suggests that the Divine Placeholders ΧΣ, ΧΥ, ΧΩ, and ΧΝ were not based upon Christos, Christou, Christo, or Christon, as those who have an aversion to all things Hebrew would have you believe.
Yahowsha is not "the Christ."The Savior's actual title,"ha Ma'aseyah –the Work ofYah," not only associates Him with Yahowah, but also defines His purpose, while theRabbinic variation disassociates Him from God and from His work.You will not find "chrios," the supposed basis of the transliteration, or its derivatives christos, christou, christo, or christon, written out in reference to Yahowsha on any page of any Renewed Covenant manuscript dating prior to the time of Constantine’s corruptions.
Since the authors of the Renewed Covenant didn’t use chrios, christos, christou, christo, or christon in relationship to Yahowsha, we have no basis for transliterating the unwritten word as "Christ," as if it were the Savior’s last name, or even His title. If their intent was for their placeholders (ΧΣ, ΧΥ, ΧΩ, or ΧΝ) to represent the Hebrew title "ha Ma'aseyah," we should replace the placeholder with ha Ma'aseyah.
@materialclassified Again it is necessary to point out your subtle satanic lies, it is not a "renewed covenant", that is what SATAN says, the Word of God says int the Old Testament and New Testament that the New Covenant is entirely NEW and the Old Covenant is not renewed but replaced.
The issue of translations of names was covered below, the Holy Spirit did not an issue about particularities or idiosyncrasies of pronunciations of different languages.
@materialclassified Jesus is called "the Christ" in the New Testament, using a Greek word for Christ and not the Hebrew one. Then, If the Holy Spirit considered good to use a Greek translation instead of the Hebrew word, it is a man made commandment to try to enforce the exclusive use of the Hebrew word. And if the Holy Spirit allowed a Greek translation, the universally established English, Spanish, etc. translations are allowed.
As far as the word, "Chrios" is only written out once in the Greek Renewed Covenant. It is used in Yahowsha’s derogatory letter to the Laodiceans in Revelation 3:18. Speaking to the Protestant Church in today’s Western democracies, Yah pokes fun at their reliance on manmade drugs - in this case the application of eye salves.
@materialclassified I repeat to you the New Covenant according with the Old Testament and the New Testament revelation is a NEW covenant not a renewed one, read below, read and change your mind according with the Word of God.
The letter to the Laodiceans speak not of Protestant Churches, there are many Protestant and Baptist churches that are well in the Philadelphian state, The Letter to the Laodiceans is about prideful with auto sufficiency churches all around the world.
@materialclassified The mention of eye salves is not to pokes fun at their reliance on man made drugs, it is an illustration using what seems the key product of the Laodiceans, to illustrate the awakening wisdom of the Lord that open the eyes of those blinded by their carnal auto sufficiency.
Okay, you're not proving anything using the NT. It's just a re-newing of Yahs Covenant. And for people that are referring to Yahowah, our God, by His worst enemy's title all the time. It means that Christians and rabbinic Jews alike are disrespecting the very One they claim to love all the time. It means that Yahowsha's prophetic declaration will most certainly come to pass: "Get away from Me! I never knew you!"
Until you walk away religion and politics, you'll not find His path.
@materialclassified You say "you're not proving anything using the NT. It's just a re-newing of Yahs Covenant". But the NT is not a re-newing of the Old Covenant, it is a complete New Covenant that substitute for ever the Old Covenant and is DIFFERENT.
31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a NEW covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
32 NOT ACCORDING to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
@materialclassified The New Covenant is NEW and is NOT ACCORDING to the Old Covenant. So it is an error to say that the New Covenant is "just a re-newing" of the Old Covenant.
So, if the New Testament presents examples of the name of God (Strong Number 03068) being replaced by the title Lord, it means that NO ONE WILL BE DAMNED BECAUSE OF THIS. The Lord is interested in people knowing Him by His grace, not in people pronouncing an Hebrew word.
Listen up..I've seen your channel, and for you to accuse me of blasphemy is laughable. You have had visions, so apparently you are decieved severly in this world. You set out to explain that you think you are a lampstand when you actually lead away from Yah. You don't understand Yah and how He diminished Himself for those that will observe His Word.
The fact of the matter is that Yahowah's enemies have been hiding His Name from the world for thousands of years.
That is why, in just about every English translation of His Scriptures, you will find His Name (which is written in Hebrew like this—יהוה) translated as "the LORD" instead of transliterated as "Yahowah". That is why the followers of rabbinic Judaism refer to Him as "ha shem" (generic Hebrew term which literally means "the name"), "Adonay" (Hebrew word which means "lord, master, owner"), and "G-d" (which is just dumb).
The exact English translation of the Hebrew words ha ba'al is "the Lord". Let me say it again. "The LORD" is the literal English translation of the Hebrew words, ha ba'al. "Ha Baal" is written in Hebrew like this: הבעל. As you can see, it looks absolutely nothing like the Creator's Name, יהוה. Therefore, no good reason exists for the translators to be using "The Lord" where "Yahowah" is what was written in Hebrew.
@materialclassified About Old Testament matters I was perfectly clear, I myself did point out the differences of the KJV with the Masoretic Text, and did point out for you that you should not confuse translators and translation with Scrives and Copies of the Hebrew Text (it is a heavy and grossly error to do like you did below confusing these things).
@materialclassified The fact of the matter is that John, for example, uses "kurios" (that is correctly translated as "Lord", and it utterly contradicts your strange exigencies damning all of those using "Lord". Do yo believe that you will distract us from the heavy issue you yourself did raise? No, we are very attentive to every word, and you will be now ashamed because of your lies.
@materialclassified About my visions, I have the right to put it to test, I am very comfortable and sure about such issue because I have not the bad habit of override the Holy Scriptures. So I am sure because I submit myself and my visions to Scripture. I am happy and rejoicing about that.
@materialclassified Now about your heavy new lie "Yahowah's enemies have been hiding His Name from the world for thousands of years". It is something to be applicable to evangelical Christians and early Orthodox many of which were iconoclast (the true Church of Jesus Christ), NO. To refer to God by the title Lord instead of the Hebrew name is practice authorized by JOHN THE APOSTLE (see John 1:23).
@ARYZerubbabel The Koine Greek language from which most of the Bible was translated lacked certain sounds found in Hebrew, and it had rules for names like adding an "s" to men's names that end with a vowel sound, so that "Moseh" became "Moses", "Eliyahu" [Elijah] became "Elias", and so on.
@materialclassified I know the character of the Greek of the New Testament, and that is the reason why one can prove easily that God is not interested in the exact transliteration of the Hebrew names, because He did allow the apostles to use the Greek translations that are different than the Hebrew words. So easy.
@ARYZerubbabel Moreover — and this is critical in my opinion — there was no letter "J" or sound of the letter "J" in the Hebrew or Koine Greek languages. Yes, you read that correctly. Hebrew and Greek do not have the letter "J" nor any sound for the letter "J". No matter how you try and explain it, a square peg will not fit that hole.
@materialclassified And if God is not interested in the exact transliteration of the Hebrew names (as it is proved by the fact that He did allow the apostles to use the Greek translations that are different than the Hebrew words). Then you can be sure that the use of a J by Spanish translators will not damn them nor the readers of them.
@ARYZerubbabel Well then, continue with your, "spanish." I'm not stopping anyone from continuing as before. Go right ahead, b/c you are under an illusion that Yah is interested in everyone. When He's not. You keep calling on Zeus, with your, Hey Zeus, and signing off your prayers to, Amen, and calling on Ba'al in the beginning of your prayers. Go right ahead with all you do. He made it simple for those that have eyes to see and ears to hear Him, but you ignore it all, it's okay.
@materialclassified The key issue is that the apostles used massively in Greek the title "Lord" instead of the Old Testament name of the Lord, and they used massively the Greek name of Jesus instead of the Hebrew one, then the Holy Spirit that inspired them used such things.
Then IT IS OKAY for English, Spanish, etc. to use their own translation of the Old and New Testaments. They will be no damned.
But those questioning the Holy Spirit are blaspheming.
@materialclassified Yes, those questioning the Holy Spirit when He inspired the use of the title "Lord" instead of the name are blaspheming, because they are saying that the Holy Spirit teach us to worship Ba´al. They teach that when people all around the world pronounce biblical names with a different pronunciation they necessarily are not invoking the intended divine person, when the Holy Spirit allowed it for the Greeks.
Someones have made an issue about the use of "Lord", they even put at stake the salvation of those using such word, but then there is the fact that, for example, John uses such word, and when we point out such thing they FLY TO OTHER MATTERS. Then they say that there are more important matters, he, he, as if salvation is not an important matter, and they put salvation at stake for using the word "Lord". HYPOCRITES. We NEVER WILL FORGET you have damned Christians for using "Lord", NEVER.
There are some blasphemers that say "Lord, is Ba'al and you're worshipping him", and despite the New Testament is entirely against such devilish statement, using the word Lord within "the Lord", despite the fact that they themselves are ashamed by the New Testament testimony, despite the fact that they say "I'll deal with that issue when I get to it", they pretend that we submit ourselves to their "superior authority". Away with those blasphemers. Pastors, watch your churches.
In the first month (called Aviv in the Hebrew calendar), on the fourteenth day of the month, we are to celebrate Yahowah’s Passover (notice the fact that Yahowah says this is His Passover, not “man’s” or “the Yahudym/Jew’s”, whom people seem to think that Passover was only for – it isn’t, by the way). The main point of contention with regards to Passover is when exactly to eat it. I guess you can do like christians, and call it a last supper..
Yahowah tell us in Leviticus 23:4‑5: These are the appointed feasts of Yah, the Set-Apart (qodesh) Assemblies (migra’ (although as this is in its plural form, this is pronounced mirqra’ay)(more than one), which you shall proclaim at the time appointed for them(for them indicates all). In the first month, on the fourteenth [day] of the month at twilight, is Yahowah’s Passover.
Time and time again, we find that if we make the effort, there are no gaps nor inconsistencies between man's science and Yahowah's Word, except for where science gets something wrong for a short period of time before it evolves to the point where it "coincidentally" synchronizes with what Yah has told us. Like Yahs name being removed from scripture, 7000 times. Notice, 7, again!...You start getting the feeling that Yahowah loves this number, and you'll see why. It has to do with 6 plus 1..later!
This nuance is what Evangelicals miss when they idiotically stick their brains in the sand when they claim that the universe is 6,000 years old and ignore all the evidence to the contrary.
And sadly, the cost is they look like idiots and make rational people run away from God, while also denying themselves the amazement that comes from taking the time to find the brilliance and perfectly synchronized complexity woven into everything He has to say.
This is admittedly a subtle nuance to emphasize, since Yah is the one who set up the variables in our existence that define the science/physics of our reality.
That is,with that in mind,one could say Yah arbitrarily made everything happen.
However,it's much different to read His Word and think "I wonder why He did that?"or "If that's what the Bible says, then I'll just believe that no matter what" instead of "That makes perfect sense, and fits with everything we know about science and history."
Look, you're on a video descibing the Called Out Assemblies of, Pesach/Passover, (the exacting door we enter) all the way through Yahs six remaining Festivals, to the crescendo of, Sukah/Tabernacles (where the 1k yrs of Yah engraving the Torah on our hearts) . If you don't recognize yet the corruption of scripture, then you are and have been wasting your time. From Adam till now, man has been under Satans beguiling, and I can't help, locked up in their own religion, christians, like yourself.
“Jehovah” is very much a made up name and it most certainly isn’t the name of God at all. What the Masoretes actually did was to remove Yahowah’s name from His own Scripture, and instead of putting the vowels a, and o above and/or below the four Hebrew letters of Yahowah’s name, , they instead put the vowels of ‘adonai over it instead. This is because of a strange belief that developed after the Jews had been slaves in Babylon, a belief that people are not allowed to utter Yah’s name.
Instead of just rendering ‘adonai as “Lord” and actually putting Yah’s name back in His own Scripture, English translations, for at least 400 years, have been constantly confusing everyone and instead have to do some fancy translating in order to get the difference of ‘adonai, Yahowah and ‘elohim across, when all they needed to have done was to put Yah’s name back into Scripture and then the differences between ‘adonai, Yahowah and ‘elohim would be clear.
It's nice the Masoretes didn’t completely remove Yahowahs’s name from Scripture. In 50 places in Scripture, what’s usually known as the “shorter form” of Yahowah’s name appears as which is transliterated as Yah. This name, Yah, is composed of the first two letters of Yahowah’s name, the Yod () and the Hey (). The Yod and the Hey together are also vocalised as Yah when appearing at the end of other names in Scripture.
For instance, Isaiah’s actual name in Hebrew is Yasha’Yah and means “Yahowah is Salvation”. Yasha’Yah is a contraction of the Hebrew yasha which means “to save” and of the shorter version of Yahowah’s name, Yah.
Why do English translators remove God’s own name from His own Scripture and instead replace it with a meaningless title, “the LORD”? Who corrupted this? Was it the deciever? In Isaiah (more accurately, Yasha’Yah) chapter 42:8, He definitely answers what His name is, for all time.
“I am (‘aniy – I, me) Yahowah (YHWH) - That is (hiy’ – this is, this exists as) My name (shem – name, reputation, authority, memorial, fame, glory, renown, honour, character and report) . . . ”Yahowah’s shem is His “glory.” It is His “Honour.” It is His “Authority.” His name is what His reputation is based on. It is the key to the relationship between God and mankind.
@materialclassified Wait a moment, not so fast. You have not answered why John use the word "Lord", if to use it is so bad (according with all of your Hebrew root bla, bla) WHY JOHN USE IT. You can be sure that I will not answer new issues if you remain silent about the core issue. You have made an issue about the use of "Lord", John contradicts you, and YOU SAY NOTHING. Do not believe that I will forget it after your piling up of blabbing.
Like Paul, you must be waiting to pounce...lol. I will prove to you soon enough as to why I tell you, "Lord,"is just a word, men made up to lord over each other.
At their best, translations are a compromise between attempts at word-for-word literalism and loose thought-for-thought interpolations.Either way, much of the intended message is lost or misrepresented for the sake of readability, brevity, or familiarity.After I will begin showing you this soon. For now, other matters!
@materialclassified Conclusion, you cannot answer why John, for example, uses the word "Lord" contradicting your views. Seems as if "Lord" is not man made, he, he, John uses it and for him it is not man made. And I am not speaking here of the Old Testament Translations (having proved that Scribes maintained the correct word), I am speaking here of THE NEW TESTAMENT, JOHN FOR EXAMPLE, why John use the word "kurios" (correctly translated "Lord" into English).
How nice is to see you so fast to go away from the questions you cannot answer, the hard questions about the proof that you are utterly wrong when you condemn them using "Lord".
Come on boy, be brave and tell us the truth, you are badly upset Because John, for example, is against you in your core claim.
Do you believe that we do not perceive your defeat?
@materialclassified Come on boy. Say us something about the issue you yourself did raise. You say that to use "Lord" is a thing of evil doers, then WHY JOHN DO IT?
How nice the trap in which you yourself did put yourself with your Hebrew root heresies!
@ARYZerubbabel Man, f--- you, I'm on my own timeline and I'll deal with that issue when I get to it. Lord, is Ba'al and you're worshipping him, I'll prove that when I'm ready, not some christian timeline b/c I know for a fact most christians pay little notice of Yahs dates and times, so f---you again for calling me, boy. Your life isn't in my hands. I'm irrelevant to your life. Your life is in your hands as it relates to coming to know, trust, rely upon, and love Yah.
That is the purpose of freewill, of scriptual revelation, and of judgment. If you make or have made the right choice, based upon the right information and proper reasoning, then the fate of your eternal life already has been or will be transferred entirely into Yah's hands. And He has already promised to be merciful to those who accept Him on His terms, and not some, "salvation through grace."
Since Christmas and Easter are wrong. Hopefully, you understand that the Miqra'ey-Called-Out Assemblies are right. You know that there is a human history in process of removing Yah's name from Scripture and in creating the name "Jesus Christ,"--first used in 1629. Hopefully, you'll read far enough into the details of the religious process which changed Yahowah to Lord and Yahowshua (Yah Saves) to Jesus--the horned one of the Druid religion.
The bigger issue is that the way is manmade, artificial, and popular which leads to death and the destruction of one's soul. And the way is restrictive, narrow, and very unpopular which leads to life-and few there are who find it. The door is Passover and the way is the Miqra'ey/Called Out Assemblies of Unleavened Bread, FirstFruits, Sevens, Trumpets, and Reconciliations, leading to Shelters.
Notice, 7 Festivals for Yah, all corrupted and conterfieted to days for christians.
It is why the harvest known as the rapture will occur, but hardly anyone will notice. The prophecies are true, and they are being fulfilled before our eyes. But unfortunately, most prophecy buffs are focusing on the wrong ones. Knowing who Gog and the AC are won't save anyone. Knowing and relying upon who Yah is and what Yahowsha did, will save everyone. Observe/shamar His Torah. These are in the very heart of His Word and He will engrain them upon our hearts in His time.
@materialclassified You say "Lord, is Ba'al and you're worshipping him", typical of you, to generalize, to blaspheme, to say what you want, BUT YOU DO NOT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE WORD OF GOD, John is completely against you, he uses the word "Lord", no amount of your "timeline" will change that, for us you are an enemy of the truth, a blasphemer, THE WORD OF GOD IS SUPPORTING THIS VIEW.
@ARYZerubbabel Are you now fixated on, Yowchanan/John? To let you know, I will not rely upon the KJV, NKJV, ASB, NASB, IV, NIV, or any other popular Scriptural rendition. All English translations vary from poor to horrible. There isn't any worth recommending.
The reason they are all errant and inadequate is that they all come from the same polluted well and familiarity sells.
Yahowah is not impressed by those who have done well within man's systems (educational, political, economical, military, or religious). Their devotion to things and persons other than His Word and His Son make them despicable and loathsome to our Creator. Nevertheless, the overwhelming majority of earth's people eat that kind of stuff up, so the deceiver succeeds over and over again. His desire is to Lord over mankind in place of Yah who wants an upright relationship with us, not bowing!
So how does Ha Satan achieve such incredible results? His mouthpieces are believable, that's how. They are most often persons of impeccable credentials, impressive educational credits, and have the praises and approval of their peers. These people are believable. They're multiplying lies and deception, leading millions and millions of souls to destruction, because they are so believable. I didn't deliniate the path to a few who find it, Yahowsha did.
Proverbs 30:4 Who has ascended into heaven and descended? Who has gathered the wind in His fists? Who has wrapped the waters in His garment? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is His Name or His Son's Name? Surely you know!
The Name of the Son of Yahowah is Yahowshua. "Yahowshua" means "Yah saves", or "the salvation of Yah". "Yah" is Yahowah's Name in a commonly abbreviated and completely acceptable form; it can be found in many Hebrew names such as Yashayah (Isaiah), Yirmeyah (Jeremiah), Zekaryah (Zechariah), Eliyah (Elijah), etc. Unfortunately, English translations of the Scriptures traditionally refuse to transliterate Hebrew names.
As for the name Jesus Christ, it is man-made. The Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, and Latin languages had/have no letter or sound for "J". In fact, the letter "J", and the sound for the letter "J", did not appear in any language in the world prior to the 1600's, a fact you can easily verify with any reliable dictionary. So, yes, just like the song says, there really is just something about that name, Jesus: it is not the Name of the Son of Yahowah Almighty and it won't save anybody, ever.
Romans 6:14 For sin shall not be your master, because you are not under law, but under grace. Yahowsha (Jesus) Says:
Luke 16:17 But it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one stroke of a letter in the Torah to become void. Paul says that we are not under the law, Yahowsha says that it would be easier for the entire universe to be destroyed than for even one letter of His Torah to become void.
Romans 7:4 So, my brothers, you also died to the law through the body of Christ, that you might belong to another, to him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit to God.
Matthew 19:17 "Why do you ask me about what is good?" Yahowsha replied. "There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, obey the commandments." Paul says that we must die to the Torah, Yahowsha says that if we want to enter life we must obey Torah. Both statements cannot be true.
Ephesians 2:14-15a For he himself is our peace, who has made the two one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility by abolishing in his flesh the law with its commandments and regulations.
Matthew 5:17-18 "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished."
Paul says that Yahowsha abolished the Torah, Yahowsha says exactly the opposite. Paul wrote his letter to the Ephesians in the 50's. Yahowsha says that the entire universe must be destroyed before the smallest mark on the page of the Torah would disappear. Unless heaven and earth disappeared sometime between the 30's and the 50's, nothing written in The Law is to be disregarded.
Galatians 3:13 Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: "Cursed is everyone who is hung on a tree."
Matthew 19:17 "Why do you ask me about what is good?" Yahowsha replied. "There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, obey the commandments."
In Psalms 19:7, David says "The Torah of YHWH is perfect, restoring the inner person. The instruction of YHWH is sure, making wise the thoughtless." In Galatians, Paul says the Law (the Torah) is a curse. Yahowsha says only God (YHWH, Yahowah) is good and if you want to enter into life, obey the Torah. If it is the way to enter into eternal life, then is cannot be a curse. See Galatians chapter 3 and Romans chapter 3 for Paul's full on assault upon the Torah.
Galatians 2:16 know that a man is not justified by observing the law, but by faith in Yahowsha. So we, too, have put our faith in Yahowsha that we may be justified by faith in Yahowsha and not by observing the law, because by observing the law no one will be justified.
Matthew 16:27 "For the Son of Man is going to come in his Father's glory with his angels, and then he will reward each person according to what he has done."
Paul says don't even try to follow God's "prescriptions for living", the Law, the Torah. Yahowsha says that you will be rewarded according to what you actually do, the deeds you carry out. He was all about Torah3, the deeds He is referring to are those spelled out in Torah. These deeds are what His Father (our Father, too) asked us to do in His Scriptures.
Are you sick of this false apostle that came just after Yahowsha even after He Himself told YOU, not to look towards the desert, and yet we find this false apostle picking scales off his eyes after his same blinding light that Mohammed and Joseph Smith experienced.
@materialclassified So you can see, all the Scripture is against your concept of the Law as the mean to live by the works of the Law. The law itself curse you, the prophets declare Israel a breaker of the Old Covenant, everything point against you as damned to hell because of your confidence in works. The Law show you your need of the New Covenant not based on your works but on the blood of Jesus Christ. This is the manner in which the Law helps you, damning you.
But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for HE [[Paul]] IS A CHOSEN VESSEL UNTO ME, TO BEAR MY NAME BEFORE THE GENTILES, AND KINGS, AND THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL:
"making wise the simple" --- Romans 3:20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.
@materialclassified About your blasphemy against Paul, apostle of Jesus Christ, when you say Paul says the Law is a curse, hiding of us the fact that the law is a curse for us the sinners so we can convert to Jesus, I have noted it below, you are wasting your time if you believe we will not read the entire phrases of Paul, apostle of Jesus Christ. Your incomplete phrases will not misguide us.
@materialclassified The Lord Jesus Chris Himself instituted the New Covenant replacing the Old Covenant. So why do you say "Here we go again"? You only show your evil ignorance with your insistence in rejecting the teaching of the Word of God that the Old Covenant make you convict and a New Covenant is today present for those believing in the blood of the New Covenant
Names are important to Yahowah. They all communicate something important. For example, Sarah, who serves as the mother of Yahuwdym and Yisra'el, was named "to strive with, to contend with, to engage with, to be empowered by, to persist with, to persevere with, and to be set free"—each of which is a Covenant benefit. Her name forms the middle portion of Yisra'el, a compound term comprised of "'ysh – individual" who,...cont
Man worshiping God not only diminishes Him, it serves no purpose. Let me explain. Can you imagine being so insecure, so inadequate, so self-absorbed, that you would create an inferior being, say garden slugs for example, for the purpose of prostrating themselves at your feet while ritualistically and repetitively telling you how wonderful you are—all the while devouring and sliming up everything around you. Lord is Ba'al..The Adversary..And the name, Jesus, is a farse.
The idea that God diminishes Himself, the notion that He would bow down before men,makes religious people very uncomfortable, as they are compelled to bow down before Him. And yet that is the antithesis of what God wants.
But now imagine conceiving children in your image, then getting down on your knees, diminishing yourself for a brief time, to show them how much you love them. And while on your knees before them, you can show them the way home; you can pick them up and protect them, so that those who choose to reciprocate your love can grow with you. That is the essence of the Covenant, of God's Family, of Yahowsha'—who is God on His knees.
While Yahowah will bless Sarah, His initial blessing wasn't for Sarah, but was instead for us through Sarah. Giving Abraham a son through this woman was part of the process God would use to "barak – diminish Himself by getting down on His knees, humbling Himself in love to favor us." Yahowsha's great, great, great
grandmother a hundred times over was this woman who in partnership with Yahowah, made it possible for us to engage with God and to live with Him.
By producing the first of thousands of children who would be born into God's family by way of His Covenant, by establishing the lineage which would lead to the
Ma'aseyah Yahowsha', Yahowah "barak – diminished Himself in love to favor" Sarah, and us through her, by making it possible for "gowym – people
everywhere" "hayah – to become" "malakym – empowered and authorized" members of our Heavenly Father's "'am – family."...cont
cont'd... As such, this serves as a succinct summary of God's "beryth – family-oriented covenant relationship.
Beyond this etymological insight into the purpose of the Covenant, consider the bigger, and more obvious, observation: Abraham poked fun at God without any negative repercussions. In fact, Yahowah responded favorably to Abraham's sense of humor. It is as if this is what God wanted in the first place: an honest reaction, a relaxed relationship, and some good fun.
@ARYZerubbabel So God spoke but one language." Lord" is a contrivance by the Masoretic scribes and other evil men to hide the Creator's Name through deception and craftiness. The Creator of all things is manifesting His Name in these days ahead so no man will be without excuse, including you.
The truth of the matter is that the Hebrew words which are best translated into English as "the Lord" are "HA BAAL". That's right: the Lord, if he is anybody, is Baal, better known as Satan, or the adversary. The Maker of Heaven and Earth is Yahowah. "The Lord" is not a name.
"I am Yahowah your God ..." Names 20:2
"I am Yahowah. That is My Name." Isaiah/ Yashayahu 42:8
Religious clerics of the Judeo-Christian ilk have deliberately misrepresented the Master's true Name. They have lied to you and to me. The truth is right there in front of them, they take their pay from us to provide that truth, and they haughtily reject that truth, opting instead to pander their religious dogma, their Satanic lies, their clergy-laity heresy.
Yahowah revealed His Name to us roughly 7,000 times in the Tanak (the TorAh, Newi'im [Prophets], and Ketuwim [Writings], errantly referred to as the "Old Testament"). He wants us to know His Name; He wants us to use His Name; He wants us to call upon His Name; and He wants us to declare His Name to others.
Whenever translators for the major publishing houses see "Yahowah"
(יהוה) in the ancient Hebrew texts, they "translate" it as "the Lord" rather than properly transliterating the Name into Yahowah, which is the only honest way to do it. They have no reason to hide His Name other than their desire to conform to man's tradition. The tradition to which they are conforming has no Scriptural foundation whatsoever:
it is based solely on an ancient rabbinic superstition which holds forth that the Creator's Name is too "sacred" to be uttered. Since the enemy of our souls does not want us to know or call upon the only Name that can save us, we can be certain that he has a heavy hand in all these dishonest and deliberately deceptive translation practices.
@sweetpea16969 I'll give Mark Blitz credit for finding this. He deserves the credit. But as for understanding? Nah, forget it. If you understood, you never would follow a false messiah in the first place. If G-d thinks you guys rate hanging around His universe, He'll Teach you - with the kinds of Tools not available to mere mortals like me. If not, it was nice meeting you.
rkossover 4 days ago
Just stick with the Jewish stuff here; cut out all the Christian baloney. Sukkot and PessaH are holidays that deal with the Divine Redemption of Israel. These events in 5708, and 5727, respectively, were major events dealing with the re-establishment of Jewish (and eventually Hebrew) rule over Israel. The events that are likely to occur in 5773 or 5774 will bring about a major furtherance in the establishment of a OUR rule here in Israel and a shift in the way you non-Hebrews view us.
rkossover 1 week ago
@rkossover Hahahahahahahahah, hahahahhahaha, You should open your eyes, why do you think Yeshua cursed the fig tree.
sweetpea16969 4 days ago
What else could you say? I love the silence and the looks on your faces!
TheEvolytion 1 month ago
YadaYah radio is on Mon thru Fri, from 10:00am CST to 11:30am every day, on the internet.
Google it. It will be some of the best times of your life, and just maybe afterwords too!...lol
materialclassified 1 month ago
Comment removed
materialclassified 1 month ago
The Divine Placeholders used in the Greek text to represent the Ma'aseyah were based upon Chrestus, not Christos, we find a perfect match. Both words convey the same message:
Yahowsha' is Yah's "Useful Implement," His "Upright Servant," who does "Good, Moral, and Beneficial Work." And that is better than being "Christ/Drugged." It is therefore reasonable for us to conclude that Yahowah assigned the title Ma'aseyah to Yahowsha'.
More on this when time allows me.
Best to all.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Recognizing that mala'kah is based upon mal'ak (errant angel)", which is "a spiritual being,
God's servant, a theophanic manifestation tasked with the job of delivering the heavenly
message," it becomes evident that we are being asked not to do the work of the Ma'aseyah, because He is the "Implement Yahowah has Tasked to Do His Work." In other words: Yah can save us, but we cannot save ourselves. This is important, ARY, so I can show you that Gods Word stands for all time. His Covenant.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Ma'aseyah helps illuminate Yahowah's First Written Instruction: "Zakar/Remember the Shabat/Sabbath." After using two of Hebrew's three words for "doing work," 'abad and 'asah, (the other being ma'aseh) Yahowah asks us not to do any mala'kah on Shabat.
materialclassified 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ma'aseyah provides a perfect depiction of how Yahowah used Yahowsha'. As Ma'aseyah, He was "Yah's Implement, Doing the Work of Yahowah." Ma'aseyah even serves as the perfect complement to Yahowsha', whereby we are told that "Salvation is from Yah."
materialclassified 1 month ago
Comment removed
materialclassified 1 month ago
Every Scriptural name and title, from Isaiah to Zachariah, from Mount Moriah to the Messiah, which is transliterated "iah" today, is actually "yah" in the revealed text. Just as Qumbayah and Halaluyah speak volumes to those with an ear for Yah's Word today, so does the legacy of "iah" at the end of "Messiah."
materialclassified 1 month ago
Consider this: writing about the great fire which swept through Rome in 64 CE, the Roman historian Tacitus (the classical world's most authoritative voice) in Annals XV.44.2-8, revealed: "All human efforts…and propitiations of the gods, did not banish the sinister belief that the fire was the result of an order [from Nero].
materialclassified 1 month ago
Chrestus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilate. And a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Iudaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their center and become popular.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of
firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination when daylight had expired."
materialclassified 1 month ago
Comment removed
materialclassified 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
But there is more, the Nestle-Aland 27th Edition Greek New Testament reveals that
Chrestus (χρηστ ς) was scribed ὸ in 1 Peter 2:3, not Christos. Their references for this include Papyrus 72 and the Codex Sinaiticus, the oldest extant witnesses of Peter's (actually of Shim'own Kephas') letter.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Chrestus isn't Yahowsha's title, it is at least an apt translation of it. Chrestus
means "useful implement," and "upright servant," as well as "merciful one." It was used to"depict the good and beneficial work of a moral person." So rather than being "drugged," a Chrestucian is a "useful implement, an upright servant, and a moral person working beneficially" with Yah.
materialclassified 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@maranathachapelTV Dear Brothers of maranathachapelTV: I need your help, under your video "Mark Biltz; Blood Moons And Solar Eclipses Part 1", I was refuting some serious errors of materialclassified, I have carefully redacted my answers to his doctrinal challenges and posted them in a fine threaded argument, only to find all my hard work flagged as spam.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@ARYZerubbabel It's not I, that's flagging your responses. I wish it would stop, but such is mans doing. Maybe it has a reason since everything which is important to Yahowah is separated and thus set apart. This then is why the Covenant was "karat –
cut through the process of separation." Most people will be excluded from Yahowah's family, because to be included, a person must first separate themselves from the world of religion and politics.
materialclassified 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This post is only to report that my answers below carefully redacted and following a fine thread of argument were unfairly flagged as spam. I do not accuse anyone about it, but I want to report it. Important arguments about the preservation of the Word of God were hidden from the reader with that horrible "flag as spam" button.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
I just realized I was wrong, looked at it wrong. Sorry
Kyjo34 1 month ago
I noticed that on the year 638 that their was a total lunar eclipse on Aug. 30th and then one on Sept. 29th. Is that rare to have a total eclipse so close to each other?
Kyjo34 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yada Yah Internet radio is own air at this time, btw 10:00am CST to usually 11:30am. Anyone can call into the host.
Google YadaYah radio and you can archieve the old shows. I highly recommend the Passover Shows. The host does a good job in my opinion.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Comment removed
materialclassified 1 month ago
And our focus should be on Yahowah, not Yahowsha', and on the Towrah, Prophets, and Psalms, not on the Greek texts. God does the saving..Halle Lu Yah-Radiate Yahs Light.
"Remember The Sabbath and keep it Set-Apart."
Don't follow the conquering sun of Constantine.
materialclassified 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@materialclassified So, all of we that believe in the power of God to preserve His word in the Church will embrace happily and with joy the Greek New Testament traditional texts, and will treasure it as it is THE WORD OF GOD, and will rely in it, and will focus in it, in the Gospels, in Acts, in the writing of all of the Apostles, also in Paul who extended the Church (the Christian Churches fixed the cannon, not the strangers to the Christian Church).
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@materialclassified All of us, real bible believers will embrace the traditional texts that the very churches of Asia, the churches of Revelation of John, had embraced.
GLORY BE TO THE FATHER, THE SON AND THE HOLY SPIRIT.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
Before I go, I just want to tell ppl that, If you invest the time, what you will learn is that there are over 300,000 known discrepancies between the Texus Receptus and the oldest manuscripts. And then there are even more translation errors - and those from a language which was itself a translation of what was actually spoken. And while the problem is devastating for Christianity, it isn't all that significant when someone has the right perspective.
materialclassified 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@materialclassified Then you do not believe in the power of the Word of God (as if we have not perceived it of you in many forms of your discourse) to remain preserved forever, as it is written:
1 Peter 1:23
Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by THE WORD OF GOD, WHICH LIVETH AND ABIDETH FOR EVER
You believe that we need to resource to obscure old manuscripts that the Church did not accept nor did transmit.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A real believer in the Word of God believes that the Word of God never was lost, always was present and visible, and by faith know that minor alterations of the traditional text are without consequences.
The heretics are desperate to reject the traditional texts of the New Testament and to find some old manuscript not transmitted by the Church.
So I am VERY comfortable with the Word of God and believe in the power of God keeping it IN THE CHURCH.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Surely, for those gullible ones that do not believe in the preserving power of God,it is a problem, the incredible number of discrepancies between the traditional texts and some archaeological findings of bad (not transmitted by the Church) old manuscript. It is a problem for them. Surely you, and Satan, can rejoice how the problem is "devastating for Christianity", as you say, but it is a problem for the ignorant ones, those ignoring the preserving power of God for His word.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@materialclassified Then you, and Satan, will have to suffer dismay forever because there always will remain those that understand clearly that about THE WORD OF GOD, WHICH LIVETH AND ABIDETH FOR EVER. That is to say, there is a strong portion of Christianity that is adamant in the faith that God preserve His word, and accept with faith the New Testament traditional Greek texts. So Satan and you will have to "live" with it till FOREVER.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
No more Tim Tebows for today. I'll address any questions on your Sabbath, Sunday, the 1st day of the week for you christians. You will not understands Gods plan of 6 plus 1, until you, yourself come out of Urr.
materialclassified 1 month ago
@materialclassified Yes Christians:
Acts 11:26 And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.
Acts 26:28 Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian.
1 Peter 4:16 Yet if any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
ARY, I see this as a stubborn legacy of Christianity, where salvation is not only the most important thing, you are told that all you have to do is believe to be saved. And what you are asked to believe is that God died for your sins--which is an impossibility as God as spirit cannot die. As a Christian you don't have to know anything about God other than He died. Christians would then have you bow your head and repeat their sinners prayer...cont.
materialclassified 1 month ago
cont'd.... But yet how do you come to believe them unless you go to one of their meetings, read their literature, or listen to their sermons? You don't become immortal or perfect by "shamar - examining and considering" the Towrah. But by observing what the Towrah teaches, its guidance and directions, you will come to know how to receive these gifts.
It takes time to build a relationship, even with God!
Why did He use the word, "Rermember?" You think on that until Sunday.
materialclassified 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@materialclassified The person of Jesus Christ always existed and will exist as God, of the same substance and nature that God the Father:
John 1:1-3
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2 The same was in the beginning with God.
3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@materialclassified
Revelation 1:8
I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.
Revelation 1:11-13
11 Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and, What thou seest, write ........
12 And I turned to see the voice that spake with me. And being turned, I saw seven golden candlesticks;
13 And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, .....
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
John 20:27-29
27 Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing.
28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, MY LORD AND MY GOD.
29 Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, THOU HAST BELIEVED: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ephesians 3:9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:
Colossians 1:17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
Hebrews 1:10 And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands:
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@materialclassified So Jesus always was and will be God alike God the Father, of the same divine nature as His Father. Then for the redemption of those that will believe in Him and His sacrifice, the Son of God added to His person the human nature, then He became also a man, so as a man He can experience death to expiate the sins of those that will believe.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
John 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Philippians 2:6-8
6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@materialclassified So, according with the Word of God, the person of Jesus Christ is of eternal existence and of the same divine nature than God the Father, and by the miraculous incarnation narrated in some of the Gospels, the same divine person of the Son added for Himself the human nature. So God the Son really died for us, it was the same divine person, in His human nature, Who experienced a real death for us.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
Therefore, there are three correct choices and one incorrect option. Guess which one religious men chose? Is it any wonder Yahowsha called the Catholics "dead" and Protestants "vomit?"
Today should be your, "double portion" day. He tolds us to, "Remember His Shabat/Sabbath."
Tomorrow is Shabat, for those that actually choose Yahs promise.
Have a good day!
materialclassified 1 month ago
@materialclassified There are many protestant individual churches that are well within a Philadelphian pattern, so your generalization on denominations is futile, and your inclusion of Catholic within the churches of Revelation is a disgrace, the Roman Church is the Harlot of Revelation, not a true church of Jesus Christ.
Tomorrow is Shabat, and Old Testament shade of the body of Jesus, the Church, the body of all those now enjoying the eternal rest of salvation.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
Sorry Ary, to further indict "Christ" and "Christian," even if the tertiary definition of chriso, "anointed," were intended, that connotation still depicts the "application of a medicinal ointment or drug." And should we ignorantly and inadvisably jettison this pharmaceutical baggage, we'd still be left with other insurmountable problems.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Comment removed
materialclassified 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Scriptural evidence strongly suggests that Yahowsha's title was not "ha
Mashiach," which means "the Anointed," but instead "ha Ma'aseyah," which translates to "the Implement Doing the Work of Yahowah."Second,"ha Ma'aseyah,"as a Hebrew title, like the name Yahowsha',should have been transliterated (presented phonetically) in Greek and also English, not translated. For example,the titles Rabbi,Imam,Pharaoh,Czar,Sheik,and Pope were all transliterated,not translated.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Yahowsha' was not Greek, did not speak Greek, and did not have a Greek name or a Greek title, so to infer that He did by crudely transliterating Ieosus
Christos "Jesus Christ" is grossly misleading and completely deceptive.
Third, there is no justification for using Hellenized nomenclature when addressing a
Hebrew concept. And since Yahowsha' did not communicate in Greek, that language is nothing more than a translation of what He actually conveyed.
materialclassified 1 month ago
This would be like transliterating Genghis' "Khan" title, which means "ruler" in Mongolian, "Jinjeus Malak," because we like the letter J, the "eus" ending derived from Greek grammar, and malak has the same meaning in Hebrew. Worse, how about rendering Caesar Augustus, "Hairy August," as that is what caesar means in English. It's idiotic and just not right!
materialclassified 1 month ago
And fourth, the textual evidence suggests that the Divine Placeholders ΧΣ, ΧΥ, ΧΩ, and ΧΝ were not based upon Christos, Christou, Christo, or Christon, as those who have an aversion to all things Hebrew would have you believe.
See above...
materialclassified 1 month ago
Yahowsha is not "the Christ."The Savior's actual title,"ha Ma'aseyah –the Work ofYah," not only associates Him with Yahowah, but also defines His purpose, while theRabbinic variation disassociates Him from God and from His work.You will not find "chrios," the supposed basis of the transliteration, or its derivatives christos, christou, christo, or christon, written out in reference to Yahowsha on any page of any Renewed Covenant manuscript dating prior to the time of Constantine’s corruptions.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Since the authors of the Renewed Covenant didn’t use chrios, christos, christou, christo, or christon in relationship to Yahowsha, we have no basis for transliterating the unwritten word as "Christ," as if it were the Savior’s last name, or even His title. If their intent was for their placeholders (ΧΣ, ΧΥ, ΧΩ, or ΧΝ) to represent the Hebrew title "ha Ma'aseyah," we should replace the placeholder with ha Ma'aseyah.
materialclassified 1 month ago
@materialclassified Again it is necessary to point out your subtle satanic lies, it is not a "renewed covenant", that is what SATAN says, the Word of God says int the Old Testament and New Testament that the New Covenant is entirely NEW and the Old Covenant is not renewed but replaced.
The issue of translations of names was covered below, the Holy Spirit did not an issue about particularities or idiosyncrasies of pronunciations of different languages.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@materialclassified Jesus is called "the Christ" in the New Testament, using a Greek word for Christ and not the Hebrew one. Then, If the Holy Spirit considered good to use a Greek translation instead of the Hebrew word, it is a man made commandment to try to enforce the exclusive use of the Hebrew word. And if the Holy Spirit allowed a Greek translation, the universally established English, Spanish, etc. translations are allowed.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
Comment removed
materialclassified 1 month ago
As far as the word, "Chrios" is only written out once in the Greek Renewed Covenant. It is used in Yahowsha’s derogatory letter to the Laodiceans in Revelation 3:18. Speaking to the Protestant Church in today’s Western democracies, Yah pokes fun at their reliance on manmade drugs - in this case the application of eye salves.
materialclassified 1 month ago
@materialclassified I repeat to you the New Covenant according with the Old Testament and the New Testament revelation is a NEW covenant not a renewed one, read below, read and change your mind according with the Word of God.
The letter to the Laodiceans speak not of Protestant Churches, there are many Protestant and Baptist churches that are well in the Philadelphian state, The Letter to the Laodiceans is about prideful with auto sufficiency churches all around the world.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@materialclassified The mention of eye salves is not to pokes fun at their reliance on man made drugs, it is an illustration using what seems the key product of the Laodiceans, to illustrate the awakening wisdom of the Lord that open the eyes of those blinded by their carnal auto sufficiency.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
Be sure a listen to the YadaYah radio show today...just google it for those interested.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Okay, you're not proving anything using the NT. It's just a re-newing of Yahs Covenant. And for people that are referring to Yahowah, our God, by His worst enemy's title all the time. It means that Christians and rabbinic Jews alike are disrespecting the very One they claim to love all the time. It means that Yahowsha's prophetic declaration will most certainly come to pass: "Get away from Me! I never knew you!"
Until you walk away religion and politics, you'll not find His path.
materialclassified 1 month ago
@materialclassified You say "you're not proving anything using the NT. It's just a re-newing of Yahs Covenant". But the NT is not a re-newing of the Old Covenant, it is a complete New Covenant that substitute for ever the Old Covenant and is DIFFERENT.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
Jeremiah 31:31-32
31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a NEW covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
32 NOT ACCORDING to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@materialclassified The New Covenant is NEW and is NOT ACCORDING to the Old Covenant. So it is an error to say that the New Covenant is "just a re-newing" of the Old Covenant.
So, if the New Testament presents examples of the name of God (Strong Number 03068) being replaced by the title Lord, it means that NO ONE WILL BE DAMNED BECAUSE OF THIS. The Lord is interested in people knowing Him by His grace, not in people pronouncing an Hebrew word.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
Listen up..I've seen your channel, and for you to accuse me of blasphemy is laughable. You have had visions, so apparently you are decieved severly in this world. You set out to explain that you think you are a lampstand when you actually lead away from Yah. You don't understand Yah and how He diminished Himself for those that will observe His Word.
The fact of the matter is that Yahowah's enemies have been hiding His Name from the world for thousands of years.
materialclassified 1 month ago
That is why, in just about every English translation of His Scriptures, you will find His Name (which is written in Hebrew like this—יהוה) translated as "the LORD" instead of transliterated as "Yahowah". That is why the followers of rabbinic Judaism refer to Him as "ha shem" (generic Hebrew term which literally means "the name"), "Adonay" (Hebrew word which means "lord, master, owner"), and "G-d" (which is just dumb).
materialclassified 1 month ago
The exact English translation of the Hebrew words ha ba'al is "the Lord". Let me say it again. "The LORD" is the literal English translation of the Hebrew words, ha ba'al. "Ha Baal" is written in Hebrew like this: הבעל. As you can see, it looks absolutely nothing like the Creator's Name, יהוה. Therefore, no good reason exists for the translators to be using "The Lord" where "Yahowah" is what was written in Hebrew.
materialclassified 1 month ago
@materialclassified About Old Testament matters I was perfectly clear, I myself did point out the differences of the KJV with the Masoretic Text, and did point out for you that you should not confuse translators and translation with Scrives and Copies of the Hebrew Text (it is a heavy and grossly error to do like you did below confusing these things).
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@materialclassified The fact of the matter is that John, for example, uses "kurios" (that is correctly translated as "Lord", and it utterly contradicts your strange exigencies damning all of those using "Lord". Do yo believe that you will distract us from the heavy issue you yourself did raise? No, we are very attentive to every word, and you will be now ashamed because of your lies.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@materialclassified About my visions, I have the right to put it to test, I am very comfortable and sure about such issue because I have not the bad habit of override the Holy Scriptures. So I am sure because I submit myself and my visions to Scripture. I am happy and rejoicing about that.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@materialclassified Now about your heavy new lie "Yahowah's enemies have been hiding His Name from the world for thousands of years". It is something to be applicable to evangelical Christians and early Orthodox many of which were iconoclast (the true Church of Jesus Christ), NO. To refer to God by the title Lord instead of the Hebrew name is practice authorized by JOHN THE APOSTLE (see John 1:23).
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
John 1:23
He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the LORD, as said the prophet Esaias.
So JOHN THE APOSTLE USES "LORD" INSTEAD OF A TRANSLITERATION OF THE HEBREW WORD NUMBER 03068:
Isaiah 40:3
The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord [03068], make straight in the desert a highway for our God.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@ARYZerubbabel The Koine Greek language from which most of the Bible was translated lacked certain sounds found in Hebrew, and it had rules for names like adding an "s" to men's names that end with a vowel sound, so that "Moseh" became "Moses", "Eliyahu" [Elijah] became "Elias", and so on.
materialclassified 1 month ago
@materialclassified I know the character of the Greek of the New Testament, and that is the reason why one can prove easily that God is not interested in the exact transliteration of the Hebrew names, because He did allow the apostles to use the Greek translations that are different than the Hebrew words. So easy.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@ARYZerubbabel Moreover — and this is critical in my opinion — there was no letter "J" or sound of the letter "J" in the Hebrew or Koine Greek languages. Yes, you read that correctly. Hebrew and Greek do not have the letter "J" nor any sound for the letter "J". No matter how you try and explain it, a square peg will not fit that hole.
materialclassified 1 month ago
@materialclassified And if God is not interested in the exact transliteration of the Hebrew names (as it is proved by the fact that He did allow the apostles to use the Greek translations that are different than the Hebrew words). Then you can be sure that the use of a J by Spanish translators will not damn them nor the readers of them.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@ARYZerubbabel Well then, continue with your, "spanish." I'm not stopping anyone from continuing as before. Go right ahead, b/c you are under an illusion that Yah is interested in everyone. When He's not. You keep calling on Zeus, with your, Hey Zeus, and signing off your prayers to, Amen, and calling on Ba'al in the beginning of your prayers. Go right ahead with all you do. He made it simple for those that have eyes to see and ears to hear Him, but you ignore it all, it's okay.
materialclassified 1 month ago
@materialclassified The key issue is that the apostles used massively in Greek the title "Lord" instead of the Old Testament name of the Lord, and they used massively the Greek name of Jesus instead of the Hebrew one, then the Holy Spirit that inspired them used such things.
Then IT IS OKAY for English, Spanish, etc. to use their own translation of the Old and New Testaments. They will be no damned.
But those questioning the Holy Spirit are blaspheming.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@materialclassified Yes, those questioning the Holy Spirit when He inspired the use of the title "Lord" instead of the name are blaspheming, because they are saying that the Holy Spirit teach us to worship Ba´al. They teach that when people all around the world pronounce biblical names with a different pronunciation they necessarily are not invoking the intended divine person, when the Holy Spirit allowed it for the Greeks.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
Someones have made an issue about the use of "Lord", they even put at stake the salvation of those using such word, but then there is the fact that, for example, John uses such word, and when we point out such thing they FLY TO OTHER MATTERS. Then they say that there are more important matters, he, he, as if salvation is not an important matter, and they put salvation at stake for using the word "Lord". HYPOCRITES. We NEVER WILL FORGET you have damned Christians for using "Lord", NEVER.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@ARYZerubbabel You put your own salvation at risk, I can't save or condemn you, idiot!
materialclassified 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There are some blasphemers that say "Lord, is Ba'al and you're worshipping him", and despite the New Testament is entirely against such devilish statement, using the word Lord within "the Lord", despite the fact that they themselves are ashamed by the New Testament testimony, despite the fact that they say "I'll deal with that issue when I get to it", they pretend that we submit ourselves to their "superior authority". Away with those blasphemers. Pastors, watch your churches.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
In the first month (called Aviv in the Hebrew calendar), on the fourteenth day of the month, we are to celebrate Yahowah’s Passover (notice the fact that Yahowah says this is His Passover, not “man’s” or “the Yahudym/Jew’s”, whom people seem to think that Passover was only for – it isn’t, by the way). The main point of contention with regards to Passover is when exactly to eat it. I guess you can do like christians, and call it a last supper..
materialclassified 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yahowah tell us in Leviticus 23:4‑5: These are the appointed feasts of Yah, the Set-Apart (qodesh) Assemblies (migra’ (although as this is in its plural form, this is pronounced mirqra’ay)(more than one), which you shall proclaim at the time appointed for them(for them indicates all). In the first month, on the fourteenth [day] of the month at twilight, is Yahowah’s Passover.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Time and time again, we find that if we make the effort, there are no gaps nor inconsistencies between man's science and Yahowah's Word, except for where science gets something wrong for a short period of time before it evolves to the point where it "coincidentally" synchronizes with what Yah has told us. Like Yahs name being removed from scripture, 7000 times. Notice, 7, again!...You start getting the feeling that Yahowah loves this number, and you'll see why. It has to do with 6 plus 1..later!
materialclassified 1 month ago
This nuance is what Evangelicals miss when they idiotically stick their brains in the sand when they claim that the universe is 6,000 years old and ignore all the evidence to the contrary.
And sadly, the cost is they look like idiots and make rational people run away from God, while also denying themselves the amazement that comes from taking the time to find the brilliance and perfectly synchronized complexity woven into everything He has to say.
materialclassified 1 month ago
This is admittedly a subtle nuance to emphasize, since Yah is the one who set up the variables in our existence that define the science/physics of our reality.
That is,with that in mind,one could say Yah arbitrarily made everything happen.
However,it's much different to read His Word and think "I wonder why He did that?"or "If that's what the Bible says, then I'll just believe that no matter what" instead of "That makes perfect sense, and fits with everything we know about science and history."
materialclassified 1 month ago
Look, you're on a video descibing the Called Out Assemblies of, Pesach/Passover, (the exacting door we enter) all the way through Yahs six remaining Festivals, to the crescendo of, Sukah/Tabernacles (where the 1k yrs of Yah engraving the Torah on our hearts) . If you don't recognize yet the corruption of scripture, then you are and have been wasting your time. From Adam till now, man has been under Satans beguiling, and I can't help, locked up in their own religion, christians, like yourself.
materialclassified 1 month ago
“Jehovah” is very much a made up name and it most certainly isn’t the name of God at all. What the Masoretes actually did was to remove Yahowah’s name from His own Scripture, and instead of putting the vowels a, and o above and/or below the four Hebrew letters of Yahowah’s name, , they instead put the vowels of ‘adonai over it instead. This is because of a strange belief that developed after the Jews had been slaves in Babylon, a belief that people are not allowed to utter Yah’s name.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Instead of just rendering ‘adonai as “Lord” and actually putting Yah’s name back in His own Scripture, English translations, for at least 400 years, have been constantly confusing everyone and instead have to do some fancy translating in order to get the difference of ‘adonai, Yahowah and ‘elohim across, when all they needed to have done was to put Yah’s name back into Scripture and then the differences between ‘adonai, Yahowah and ‘elohim would be clear.
materialclassified 1 month ago
It's nice the Masoretes didn’t completely remove Yahowahs’s name from Scripture. In 50 places in Scripture, what’s usually known as the “shorter form” of Yahowah’s name appears as which is transliterated as Yah. This name, Yah, is composed of the first two letters of Yahowah’s name, the Yod () and the Hey (). The Yod and the Hey together are also vocalised as Yah when appearing at the end of other names in Scripture.
materialclassified 1 month ago
For instance, Isaiah’s actual name in Hebrew is Yasha’Yah and means “Yahowah is Salvation”. Yasha’Yah is a contraction of the Hebrew yasha which means “to save” and of the shorter version of Yahowah’s name, Yah.
Why do English translators remove God’s own name from His own Scripture and instead replace it with a meaningless title, “the LORD”? Who corrupted this? Was it the deciever? In Isaiah (more accurately, Yasha’Yah) chapter 42:8, He definitely answers what His name is, for all time.
materialclassified 1 month ago
“I am (‘aniy – I, me) Yahowah (YHWH) - That is (hiy’ – this is, this exists as) My name (shem – name, reputation, authority, memorial, fame, glory, renown, honour, character and report) . . . ”Yahowah’s shem is His “glory.” It is His “Honour.” It is His “Authority.” His name is what His reputation is based on. It is the key to the relationship between God and mankind.
Keep studying..or better yet, shamar dabar!
materialclassified 1 month ago
@materialclassified Wait a moment, not so fast. You have not answered why John use the word "Lord", if to use it is so bad (according with all of your Hebrew root bla, bla) WHY JOHN USE IT. You can be sure that I will not answer new issues if you remain silent about the core issue. You have made an issue about the use of "Lord", John contradicts you, and YOU SAY NOTHING. Do not believe that I will forget it after your piling up of blabbing.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
Like Paul, you must be waiting to pounce...lol. I will prove to you soon enough as to why I tell you, "Lord,"is just a word, men made up to lord over each other.
At their best, translations are a compromise between attempts at word-for-word literalism and loose thought-for-thought interpolations.Either way, much of the intended message is lost or misrepresented for the sake of readability, brevity, or familiarity.After I will begin showing you this soon. For now, other matters!
materialclassified 1 month ago
@materialclassified Conclusion, you cannot answer why John, for example, uses the word "Lord" contradicting your views. Seems as if "Lord" is not man made, he, he, John uses it and for him it is not man made. And I am not speaking here of the Old Testament Translations (having proved that Scribes maintained the correct word), I am speaking here of THE NEW TESTAMENT, JOHN FOR EXAMPLE, why John use the word "kurios" (correctly translated "Lord" into English).
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
Comment removed
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@materialclassified You say "other matters!" HA HA HA =D.
How nice is to see you so fast to go away from the questions you cannot answer, the hard questions about the proof that you are utterly wrong when you condemn them using "Lord".
Come on boy, be brave and tell us the truth, you are badly upset Because John, for example, is against you in your core claim.
Do you believe that we do not perceive your defeat?
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@materialclassified Come on boy. Say us something about the issue you yourself did raise. You say that to use "Lord" is a thing of evil doers, then WHY JOHN DO IT?
How nice the trap in which you yourself did put yourself with your Hebrew root heresies!
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@ARYZerubbabel Man, f--- you, I'm on my own timeline and I'll deal with that issue when I get to it. Lord, is Ba'al and you're worshipping him, I'll prove that when I'm ready, not some christian timeline b/c I know for a fact most christians pay little notice of Yahs dates and times, so f---you again for calling me, boy. Your life isn't in my hands. I'm irrelevant to your life. Your life is in your hands as it relates to coming to know, trust, rely upon, and love Yah.
materialclassified 1 month ago
That is the purpose of freewill, of scriptual revelation, and of judgment. If you make or have made the right choice, based upon the right information and proper reasoning, then the fate of your eternal life already has been or will be transferred entirely into Yah's hands. And He has already promised to be merciful to those who accept Him on His terms, and not some, "salvation through grace."
materialclassified 1 month ago
Since Christmas and Easter are wrong. Hopefully, you understand that the Miqra'ey-Called-Out Assemblies are right. You know that there is a human history in process of removing Yah's name from Scripture and in creating the name "Jesus Christ,"--first used in 1629. Hopefully, you'll read far enough into the details of the religious process which changed Yahowah to Lord and Yahowshua (Yah Saves) to Jesus--the horned one of the Druid religion.
materialclassified 1 month ago
The bigger issue is that the way is manmade, artificial, and popular which leads to death and the destruction of one's soul. And the way is restrictive, narrow, and very unpopular which leads to life-and few there are who find it. The door is Passover and the way is the Miqra'ey/Called Out Assemblies of Unleavened Bread, FirstFruits, Sevens, Trumpets, and Reconciliations, leading to Shelters.
Notice, 7 Festivals for Yah, all corrupted and conterfieted to days for christians.
materialclassified 1 month ago
It is why the harvest known as the rapture will occur, but hardly anyone will notice. The prophecies are true, and they are being fulfilled before our eyes. But unfortunately, most prophecy buffs are focusing on the wrong ones. Knowing who Gog and the AC are won't save anyone. Knowing and relying upon who Yah is and what Yahowsha did, will save everyone. Observe/shamar His Torah. These are in the very heart of His Word and He will engrain them upon our hearts in His time.
materialclassified 1 month ago
@materialclassified You say "Lord, is Ba'al and you're worshipping him", typical of you, to generalize, to blaspheme, to say what you want, BUT YOU DO NOT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE WORD OF GOD, John is completely against you, he uses the word "Lord", no amount of your "timeline" will change that, for us you are an enemy of the truth, a blasphemer, THE WORD OF GOD IS SUPPORTING THIS VIEW.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@ARYZerubbabel Are you now fixated on, Yowchanan/John? To let you know, I will not rely upon the KJV, NKJV, ASB, NASB, IV, NIV, or any other popular Scriptural rendition. All English translations vary from poor to horrible. There isn't any worth recommending.
The reason they are all errant and inadequate is that they all come from the same polluted well and familiarity sells.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Yahowah is not impressed by those who have done well within man's systems (educational, political, economical, military, or religious). Their devotion to things and persons other than His Word and His Son make them despicable and loathsome to our Creator. Nevertheless, the overwhelming majority of earth's people eat that kind of stuff up, so the deceiver succeeds over and over again. His desire is to Lord over mankind in place of Yah who wants an upright relationship with us, not bowing!
materialclassified 1 month ago
So how does Ha Satan achieve such incredible results? His mouthpieces are believable, that's how. They are most often persons of impeccable credentials, impressive educational credits, and have the praises and approval of their peers. These people are believable. They're multiplying lies and deception, leading millions and millions of souls to destruction, because they are so believable. I didn't deliniate the path to a few who find it, Yahowsha did.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Proverbs 30:4 Who has ascended into heaven and descended? Who has gathered the wind in His fists? Who has wrapped the waters in His garment? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is His Name or His Son's Name? Surely you know!
materialclassified 1 month ago
BaRe'syth—In the Beginning—misnamed Genesis Shemowth—Names—misnamed Exodus Qara'—Called Out—misnamed Leviticus BaMidbar—In the Wilderness—misnamed Numbers Dabarym—Words—misnamed Deuteronomy Yahowshua—Yah Saves—misnamed Joshua
materialclassified 1 month ago
Stop using religion's made-up name, Jesus Christ, when you refer to Him Who loved you and gave Himself for you. It's disrespectful.
materialclassified 1 month ago
The Name of the Son of Yahowah is Yahowshua. "Yahowshua" means "Yah saves", or "the salvation of Yah". "Yah" is Yahowah's Name in a commonly abbreviated and completely acceptable form; it can be found in many Hebrew names such as Yashayah (Isaiah), Yirmeyah (Jeremiah), Zekaryah (Zechariah), Eliyah (Elijah), etc. Unfortunately, English translations of the Scriptures traditionally refuse to transliterate Hebrew names.
materialclassified 1 month ago
As for the name Jesus Christ, it is man-made. The Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, and Latin languages had/have no letter or sound for "J". In fact, the letter "J", and the sound for the letter "J", did not appear in any language in the world prior to the 1600's, a fact you can easily verify with any reliable dictionary. So, yes, just like the song says, there really is just something about that name, Jesus: it is not the Name of the Son of Yahowah Almighty and it won't save anybody, ever.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Comment removed
materialclassified 1 month ago
Here we go again!!
The Law (the Torah) is abolished.
Paul Of Tarsus Says:
Romans 6:14 For sin shall not be your master, because you are not under law, but under grace. Yahowsha (Jesus) Says:
Luke 16:17 But it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one stroke of a letter in the Torah to become void. Paul says that we are not under the law, Yahowsha says that it would be easier for the entire universe to be destroyed than for even one letter of His Torah to become void.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Paul says,
Romans 7:4 So, my brothers, you also died to the law through the body of Christ, that you might belong to another, to him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit to God.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Comment removed
materialclassified 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
but Yahowsha Says:
Matthew 19:17 "Why do you ask me about what is good?" Yahowsha replied. "There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, obey the commandments." Paul says that we must die to the Torah, Yahowsha says that if we want to enter life we must obey Torah. Both statements cannot be true.
materialclassified 1 month ago
The Law (the Torah) is abolished
Paul Of Tarsus Says:
Ephesians 2:14-15a For he himself is our peace, who has made the two one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility by abolishing in his flesh the law with its commandments and regulations.
materialclassified 1 month ago
but Yahowsha Says:
Matthew 5:17-18 "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished."
materialclassified 1 month ago
Paul says that Yahowsha abolished the Torah, Yahowsha says exactly the opposite. Paul wrote his letter to the Ephesians in the 50's. Yahowsha says that the entire universe must be destroyed before the smallest mark on the page of the Torah would disappear. Unless heaven and earth disappeared sometime between the 30's and the 50's, nothing written in The Law is to be disregarded.
materialclassified 1 month ago
The Law (the Torah) is a curse
Paul Of Tarsus Says:
Galatians 3:13 Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: "Cursed is everyone who is hung on a tree."
Christ means, plastered over, whitewashed, drugged..
materialclassified 1 month ago
but Yahowsha Says:
Matthew 19:17 "Why do you ask me about what is good?" Yahowsha replied. "There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, obey the commandments."
materialclassified 1 month ago
In Psalms 19:7, David says "The Torah of YHWH is perfect, restoring the inner person. The instruction of YHWH is sure, making wise the thoughtless." In Galatians, Paul says the Law (the Torah) is a curse. Yahowsha says only God (YHWH, Yahowah) is good and if you want to enter into life, obey the Torah. If it is the way to enter into eternal life, then is cannot be a curse. See Galatians chapter 3 and Romans chapter 3 for Paul's full on assault upon the Torah.
materialclassified 1 month ago
No one is justified by keeping the Law (Torah)
Paul Of Tarsus Says:
Galatians 2:16 know that a man is not justified by observing the law, but by faith in Yahowsha. So we, too, have put our faith in Yahowsha that we may be justified by faith in Yahowsha and not by observing the law, because by observing the law no one will be justified.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Yahowsha Says:
Matthew 16:27 "For the Son of Man is going to come in his Father's glory with his angels, and then he will reward each person according to what he has done."
materialclassified 1 month ago
Paul says don't even try to follow God's "prescriptions for living", the Law, the Torah. Yahowsha says that you will be rewarded according to what you actually do, the deeds you carry out. He was all about Torah3, the deeds He is referring to are those spelled out in Torah. These deeds are what His Father (our Father, too) asked us to do in His Scriptures.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Are you sick of this false apostle that came just after Yahowsha even after He Himself told YOU, not to look towards the desert, and yet we find this false apostle picking scales off his eyes after his same blinding light that Mohammed and Joseph Smith experienced.
materialclassified 1 month ago
@materialclassified Your blasphemies cannot penetrate the Word of God.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@materialclassified So you can see, all the Scripture is against your concept of the Law as the mean to live by the works of the Law. The law itself curse you, the prophets declare Israel a breaker of the Old Covenant, everything point against you as damned to hell because of your confidence in works. The Law show you your need of the New Covenant not based on your works but on the blood of Jesus Christ. This is the manner in which the Law helps you, damning you.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@materialclassified
Matthew 16:27
For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.
John 6:28-29
28 Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?
29 Jesus answered and said unto them, THIS IS THE WORK OF GOD, THAT YE BELIEVE ON HIM WHOM HE HATH SENT.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
Comment removed
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@materialclassified
Acts 9:15
But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for HE [[Paul]] IS A CHOSEN VESSEL UNTO ME, TO BEAR MY NAME BEFORE THE GENTILES, AND KINGS, AND THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL:
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@materialclassified
Psalms 19:7
The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple.
"The law of the Lord is perfect" --- Romans 7:12 Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.
"converting the soul" --- Galatians 3:24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@materialclassified
"making wise the simple" --- Romans 3:20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@materialclassified About your blasphemy against Paul, apostle of Jesus Christ, when you say Paul says the Law is a curse, hiding of us the fact that the law is a curse for us the sinners so we can convert to Jesus, I have noted it below, you are wasting your time if you believe we will not read the entire phrases of Paul, apostle of Jesus Christ. Your incomplete phrases will not misguide us.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
Mathew 19:25-26
25 When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying, Who then can be saved?
26 But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
So you can see, by your works it is IMPOSSIBLE, but for God it is not impossible thanks to the New Covenant.
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@materialclassified The Lord Jesus Chris Himself instituted the New Covenant replacing the Old Covenant. So why do you say "Here we go again"? You only show your evil ignorance with your insistence in rejecting the teaching of the Word of God that the Old Covenant make you convict and a New Covenant is today present for those believing in the blood of the New Covenant
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
Names are important to Yahowah. They all communicate something important. For example, Sarah, who serves as the mother of Yahuwdym and Yisra'el, was named "to strive with, to contend with, to engage with, to be empowered by, to persist with, to persevere with, and to be set free"—each of which is a Covenant benefit. Her name forms the middle portion of Yisra'el, a compound term comprised of "'ysh – individual" who,...cont
materialclassified 1 month ago
cont'd... "sarah – strives with, contends with, engages with, persists with, perseveres with, is empowered and set free by" "'el –Almighty God."
materialclassified 1 month ago
Man worshiping God not only diminishes Him, it serves no purpose. Let me explain. Can you imagine being so insecure, so inadequate, so self-absorbed, that you would create an inferior being, say garden slugs for example, for the purpose of prostrating themselves at your feet while ritualistically and repetitively telling you how wonderful you are—all the while devouring and sliming up everything around you. Lord is Ba'al..The Adversary..And the name, Jesus, is a farse.
materialclassified 1 month ago
The idea that God diminishes Himself, the notion that He would bow down before men,makes religious people very uncomfortable, as they are compelled to bow down before Him. And yet that is the antithesis of what God wants.
materialclassified 1 month ago
But now imagine conceiving children in your image, then getting down on your knees, diminishing yourself for a brief time, to show them how much you love them. And while on your knees before them, you can show them the way home; you can pick them up and protect them, so that those who choose to reciprocate your love can grow with you. That is the essence of the Covenant, of God's Family, of Yahowsha'—who is God on His knees.
materialclassified 1 month ago
While Yahowah will bless Sarah, His initial blessing wasn't for Sarah, but was instead for us through Sarah. Giving Abraham a son through this woman was part of the process God would use to "barak – diminish Himself by getting down on His knees, humbling Himself in love to favor us." Yahowsha's great, great, great
grandmother a hundred times over was this woman who in partnership with Yahowah, made it possible for us to engage with God and to live with Him.
materialclassified 1 month ago
By producing the first of thousands of children who would be born into God's family by way of His Covenant, by establishing the lineage which would lead to the
Ma'aseyah Yahowsha', Yahowah "barak – diminished Himself in love to favor" Sarah, and us through her, by making it possible for "gowym – people
everywhere" "hayah – to become" "malakym – empowered and authorized" members of our Heavenly Father's "'am – family."...cont
materialclassified 1 month ago
cont'd... As such, this serves as a succinct summary of God's "beryth – family-oriented covenant relationship.
Beyond this etymological insight into the purpose of the Covenant, consider the bigger, and more obvious, observation: Abraham poked fun at God without any negative repercussions. In fact, Yahowah responded favorably to Abraham's sense of humor. It is as if this is what God wanted in the first place: an honest reaction, a relaxed relationship, and some good fun.
materialclassified 1 month ago
@materialclassified "Lord" is not Baal, "Lord" is in the New Testament the correct translation of the Greek "Kurios". AROUND 687 TIMES.
So why you do not throw away all of your Hebrew roots garbage and stop of blaspheming against the Lord?
ARYZerubbabel 1 month ago
@ARYZerubbabel So God spoke but one language." Lord" is a contrivance by the Masoretic scribes and other evil men to hide the Creator's Name through deception and craftiness. The Creator of all things is manifesting His Name in these days ahead so no man will be without excuse, including you.
materialclassified 1 month ago
The truth of the matter is that the Hebrew words which are best translated into English as "the Lord" are "HA BAAL". That's right: the Lord, if he is anybody, is Baal, better known as Satan, or the adversary. The Maker of Heaven and Earth is Yahowah. "The Lord" is not a name.
"I am Yahowah your God ..." Names 20:2
"I am Yahowah. That is My Name." Isaiah/ Yashayahu 42:8
materialclassified 1 month ago
Religious clerics of the Judeo-Christian ilk have deliberately misrepresented the Master's true Name. They have lied to you and to me. The truth is right there in front of them, they take their pay from us to provide that truth, and they haughtily reject that truth, opting instead to pander their religious dogma, their Satanic lies, their clergy-laity heresy.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Comment removed
materialclassified 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yahowah revealed His Name to us roughly 7,000 times in the Tanak (the TorAh, Newi'im [Prophets], and Ketuwim [Writings], errantly referred to as the "Old Testament"). He wants us to know His Name; He wants us to use His Name; He wants us to call upon His Name; and He wants us to declare His Name to others.
materialclassified 1 month ago
Comment removed
materialclassified 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Whenever translators for the major publishing houses see "Yahowah"
(יהוה) in the ancient Hebrew texts, they "translate" it as "the Lord" rather than properly transliterating the Name into Yahowah, which is the only honest way to do it. They have no reason to hide His Name other than their desire to conform to man's tradition. The tradition to which they are conforming has no Scriptural foundation whatsoever:
materialclassified 1 month ago
it is based solely on an ancient rabbinic superstition which holds forth that the Creator's Name is too "sacred" to be uttered. Since the enemy of our souls does not want us to know or call upon the only Name that can save us, we can be certain that he has a heavy hand in all these dishonest and deliberately deceptive translation practices.
materialclassified 1 month ago