@spanish111japan you are so right as you talk about an "engine" of a video only shows gears that was invented over 100 yr ago and used back then too, plus there are only a ton of these stupid videos put out by this idiot, but at least there is some troll like you out there with a "open mind" meaning you only believe in the BS idiots say as long as they us the word 'green, new, anti government" but facts are just meaningless, thank you for setting me straight with 1st grade trolling HA
Soon I will show a video presentation comparing friction losses of a rotary, conventional, and my engine system. This video will prove that my engine has a lesser moving parts and friction compare to rotary and conventional engine...
I fucking love that your own comment at the top of the page is blocked for too many negative reviews.
Also, FYI, since you arent taking the hint, calling it the "TABAG" engine is never going to fly in the US. You might as well call it the "dickguzzle" engine.
I can't even start to imagine how noisy this would be if it were to replace regular engine parts. 120Db @ 1000 RPM and 3000 RPM it would be 500+ Db with ear defenders.
you realize that all your engines, in a working system would have so much friction right, and there would be massive strain on the gearing because of the way the gearing moves around the sprocket
Don't be so harsh guys. I bet you didn't invent anything yourself that's worth sharing? I like the idea of this guy and the approach is different and original.
@hacky97 It's not original and most importantly doesn't do as he claims. People that make incredible claims and don't provide proper proof are either delusional or scammers. See the the "zero point energy" idiots for a good example.
In a working prototype what would keep the flat teeth to hold against the round gear when combustion happens in the piston? The combustion would cause a great deal of stress on those individual teeth.
the real problem is not pistons, or shape, or gearing, its the internal combustion as a whole. Too much energy is lost to heat not too mention carnot won't even allow a very efficient combustion engine to begin with.
As a recently graduated mechanical engineer with years of my life and hundereds of thousands of dollars spent on this subject I can proudly say........Shenanigans!
the problem that i have is that all the prototypes are "crank " driven, never piston driven to create the motion. until then, its only a pump or transmission, NOT an ENGINE!!!!
you cant call any of these things an engine, your never actually using pistons to put power to the shaft, your doing the complete opposite, what your making is basically
a pump, if you tried to put power from the pistons the the shaft it just would not work.
Congratulations, you have just reinvented the SPIROGRAPH, a children's toy from the 60's.
Seriously do you NOT see all the inherent issues with this, the least of which is how to address the high lateral friction you create just trying to hold it in alignment? If you were to create a 'working' prototype of this, it would warp to shit from the heat and self-destruct within seconds.
@z1nyc Okay,it may be copy...But it can be revisited,and i think it's worth looking into. And it won't self-destruct if proper materials are used-AutoCAD would be useful also
cool a darth vader lightsaber!! ooh wait its the dislike bar...... *--*
brentschoppers12 3 days ago
for very slow moving it looks work! i bet when you attach motor on it, you'll trip every bit of the gear tooth!!!
molceonly 2 weeks ago
@1crazyfocker What a great dumbass you are.
He is showing us this engine, he does not claim in any part that the video is his invention.
You don't read, and make up conclusions.
Congrats, the asshole of the Month!
spanish111japan 2 weeks ago
@spanish111japan you are so right as you talk about an "engine" of a video only shows gears that was invented over 100 yr ago and used back then too, plus there are only a ton of these stupid videos put out by this idiot, but at least there is some troll like you out there with a "open mind" meaning you only believe in the BS idiots say as long as they us the word 'green, new, anti government" but facts are just meaningless, thank you for setting me straight with 1st grade trolling HA
1crazyfocker 2 weeks ago
@1crazyfocker What the fuck did I just read
spanish111japan 2 weeks ago
Soon I will show a video presentation comparing friction losses of a rotary, conventional, and my engine system. This video will prove that my engine has a lesser moving parts and friction compare to rotary and conventional engine...
died4hislove 3 weeks ago
Srsly...WTF?
PowerMirai85 3 weeks ago
I fucking love that your own comment at the top of the page is blocked for too many negative reviews.
Also, FYI, since you arent taking the hint, calling it the "TABAG" engine is never going to fly in the US. You might as well call it the "dickguzzle" engine.
htomerif 4 weeks ago
you had clear plastic holding the ends of either red and yellow pieces
arntweallgood 4 weeks ago
So what will this power?
Johnellenberger1 4 weeks ago
Bag with tea in it.
IAINoodle 1 month ago
tea bag
amedsoprano 1 month ago
I can't even start to imagine how noisy this would be if it were to replace regular engine parts. 120Db @ 1000 RPM and 3000 RPM it would be 500+ Db with ear defenders.
locouk 1 month ago
@locouk lol but a nuke only reaches about 260 so...
themoonpro 1 month ago
@TABAGfrancis moar liek teagbagfrenchdick
hehe hehe
TheRavingReview 1 month ago
Keep thinking! You make it soon
drift0141 1 month ago
you realize that all your engines, in a working system would have so much friction right, and there would be massive strain on the gearing because of the way the gearing moves around the sprocket
666TECHNO666 1 month ago
Please watch also, THE SUPER-EFFICIENT ENGINE ( Part 3).
TABAGfrancis 1 month ago
dude your shit is garbage..........
bmxguy08 2 months ago
Damn, I'm at the world saving inventions part of youtube again.
SomyTomy 2 months ago 2
just put a 'E' bet ween the 'T' and the 'A' TEABAG
MrBurnTec 2 months ago
doucheBAG!
801kangaroo 2 months ago
@PunkntheGodfather That's not a lego
appleintosh 2 months ago
this looks like absolute garbage
KrankieV2 2 months ago
@1crazyfocker To back this up... Search youtube for "Ralph Steiner". He has made even more impressive mechanical gearing systems... in the '30ies...
watch?v=Y5pen3QMgzQ
1951split 2 months ago
Don't be so harsh guys. I bet you didn't invent anything yourself that's worth sharing? I like the idea of this guy and the approach is different and original.
hacky97 2 months ago
@hacky97 It's not original and most importantly doesn't do as he claims. People that make incredible claims and don't provide proper proof are either delusional or scammers. See the the "zero point energy" idiots for a good example.
mikerjuk 1 month ago
This is the last one for me Mr. Teabag, maybe in the future i could be driving a car that has this in its engine? I sincerely hope not.....
rapplejab 2 months ago
STUPID VIDEO I am not about to click on another one of your sites.
ems7218 3 months ago
@TABAGfrancis Advertizing on your own channel? Wow, kind of creepy :/
PizzaNuggetz 3 months ago
In a working prototype what would keep the flat teeth to hold against the round gear when combustion happens in the piston? The combustion would cause a great deal of stress on those individual teeth.
heli400 3 months ago
Why would it be more effcient?
TheUberGopher 3 months ago
where can i get this lego??
PunkntheGodfather 3 months ago
Comment removed
alicenchains59 3 months ago
the real problem is not pistons, or shape, or gearing, its the internal combustion as a whole. Too much energy is lost to heat not too mention carnot won't even allow a very efficient combustion engine to begin with.
futurehipay 4 months ago
As a recently graduated mechanical engineer with years of my life and hundereds of thousands of dollars spent on this subject I can proudly say........Shenanigans!
MrAchronos 4 months ago
watch?NR=1&v=GJpKo8y7zmU
promtopltd 4 months ago
If you solve the friction , warping, and heat buildup problems, it may be viable.
hal02modder 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You can now watch the explanation on why my engine system is super-efficient by watching the following videos:
1.) Principles That Makes My Engine SUPER-EFFICIENT ( Part 1)
2.) Principles That Makes My Engine SUPER-EFFICIENT ( Part 2)
3.) Principles That Makes My Engine SUPER-EFFICIENT ( Part 3)
died4hislove 4 months ago
the problem that i have is that all the prototypes are "crank " driven, never piston driven to create the motion. until then, its only a pump or transmission, NOT an ENGINE!!!!
ForgeThought 4 months ago
you cant call any of these things an engine, your never actually using pistons to put power to the shaft, your doing the complete opposite, what your making is basically
a pump, if you tried to put power from the pistons the the shaft it just would not work.
Fwbs 5 months ago
this is just a modified gerotor.
M1ST3RHYDE 5 months ago
Congratulations, you have just reinvented the SPIROGRAPH, a children's toy from the 60's.
Seriously do you NOT see all the inherent issues with this, the least of which is how to address the high lateral friction you create just trying to hold it in alignment? If you were to create a 'working' prototype of this, it would warp to shit from the heat and self-destruct within seconds.
z1nyc 5 months ago
@z1nyc Okay,it may be copy...But it can be revisited,and i think it's worth looking into. And it won't self-destruct if proper materials are used-AutoCAD would be useful also
5ky5tr1d3r 5 months ago