they should Ban religion 4 good if all cart see religion is a bad thing at least tax it to the poor house and but a age limit on it like smoken and boze 21 age limit then see how meny want to beleave in it if they still want to beleave in the lie at least theycan make there mind up when they are 21 years old as long as 2 men or 2 woman love each other its ok
no 2 free vote on embryo bill, shops should not make cigarets be out of site its a persons choice 2 smoke it undermines ppls intelligence and i don't smoke, lack of discipline is down 2 parent nothing more
1) No one is more opinionated than a reformed smoker like myself. After having smoked for thirty-three years, I quit thirteen years ago. I was to the point that I was smoking nearly three packs a day. One day I got up to find that I could not take a complete deep breath and could not blow out. I could not blow out a match!
4) Everyone has the absolute right to breath "smoke free" air. This right supercedes any possible right of anyone to smoke in public. When there is some wanker puffing away next to the entrance of a shop, I am then forced to breath second-hand smoke when I enter the shop.
3) I realized back then that the reason people had such difficulty quitting was because of "fear." It is the fear that you will be depriving yourself of something. I also realized that I was being "used" by the money grubbing bustards in the cigarette industry. I was done with allowing them to "use" me for their gain and I realized I was far too intelligent to finance their gold plated life styles.
2) That very day I quit "cold turkey" and have not had a cigarette in my mouth even once in the past thirteen years. For the first week, I kept the pack in my pocket and found myself automatically pulling it out and reaching for a cigarette. It took a long time to recover my ability to take a complete breath and I still can't blow out very well.
1) No one is more opinionated than a reformed smoker like myself. After having smoked for thirty-three years, I quit thirteen years ago. I was to the point that I was smoking nearly three packs a day. One day I got up to find that I could not take a complete deep breath and could not blow out. I could not blow out a match!
3)I realized back then that the reason people had such difficulty quitting was because of "fear." It is the fear that you will be depriving yourself of something. I also realized that I was being "used" by the money grubbing bustards in the cigarette industry. I was done with allowing them to "use" me for their gain and I realized I was far too intelligent to finance their gold platted life styles.
2) That very day I quit "cold turkey" and have not had a cigarette in my mouth even once in the past thirteen years. For the first week, I kept the pack in my pocket and found myself automatically pulling it out and reaching for a cigarette. It took a long time to recover my ability to take a complete breath and I still can't blow out very well.
1) No one is more appointed than a reformed smoker like myself. After having smoked for thirty-three years, I quit thirteen years ago. I was to the point that I was smoking nearly three packs a day. One day I got up to find that I could not take a complete deep breath and could not blow out. I could not blow out a match!
Totally agree with you on stem cells. Religious people loathe the idea of the relief of human suffering, if it goes against their insane beliefs.
On smoking, I totally DISAGREE. The only reason the NHS is in crisis is people smoke, drink too much, eat crap and no exercise. Anything gvt can do to boost UK's health is good thing. And smoking has to be the most unworthy 'freedom' to defend. What about the freedom of people who DON'T want to get cancer/heart disease to breathe clean air?
It's not 'freedom of smoking' being defendeded, it's 'freedom of choice'. As I said, I support the smoking ban to a degree (because the right of people not breathing in smoke outweighs the right of smokers to smoke inside), HOWEVER, it went too far as it wouldn't even allow separate smoking rooms.
The extreme tax we pay on cigarettes more than makes up for the burden it causes to the NHS. And what next? Ban McDonald's? Make it a LAW that you have to be a member of a gym?
Defending 'Freedom of choice' as a general principle is utterly pointless without reference to the specific thing in question. Seperate smoking rooms????? What about employees who have to enter those rooms? Their freedom to breathe clean air counts for nothing? And the tax on cigarettes doesn't go anywhere near to compensating for illness and premature death caused to millions of people every year. Answer that!!!
Who HAS to enter a smoking room? Apart from maybe a cleaner, who would have the right not to clean that room if they so wished (though all the cleaners at my place of work smoked!), I can't see who would be forced to go in? And the amount of time they'd have to stand in there is negligible.
That's the other irritating thing about non-smokers. They always exaggerate the damage a couple of minutes, or seconds, of breathing second hand smoke causes them....
haha nice try MentalityUK, you defender of smokers. But all the science is against you on the passive smoking issue. It's the cumulative effect, not just one exposure.
While we're on the subject, nicotine man, here's some irritating thing about smokers:
cigarette butts all over the street, bad breath, stinky clothes, yellow fingers!
..cont, it's not going to give you cancer or any other disease by smelling a bit of cigarette smoke for a couple of mins. It's such a fuss about nothing. It seems that non-smokers are deliberately stubborn and sit on their high horse with their holier-than-thou attitude, without ANY ROOM for compromise. Even when that compromise virtually eliminates any harm to you whatsoever, you still want to use the "it MIGHT hurt me IF I have to breath it at SOME point in time in the future" excuse!
Here in Florida, smoking is totally banned in any place of business and all government buildings. The only exception is a bar (pub) that does not serve food. The problem with smoking rooms and areas is that in most buildings the air systems (heating and cooling) cannot totally prevent second hand smoke from being circulated throughout the building.
"Should shops be banned from displaying cigarettes?"
This question reminded me of something else I'd read about someone we all know and love:
House Resolution 1039, by state Rep. Sally Kern, R-Oklahoma City, calls on Oklahoma libraries to "confine homosexually themed books and other age-inappropriate material to areas exclusively for adult access and distribution."
I suppose displaying gay themed books will automatically turn kids gay?
Where this becomes a serious problem is should a cure or a medicine be developed because of stem sell research, we might have to pay exorbitant amounts because of patents obtained for such developments. Whenever we fall behind in science and technology we pay through the nose.
Here in the colonies, there is no ban on stem cell research, however there is a ban on federal funding of stem cell research. Without government funding, there might as well be a ban. What this means is that Great Britton and the United States will have to play "catch-up" some day. Why? Because Russia, China and all of the other world powers not encumbered by religious dogma dingbats will become advanced in this field.
hi there holiday34691 - good point about China - they're exploiting all economic opportunities to the max. China will overtake USA in around 25 years if not sooner. Imagine what a nightmare they would be if they were a religious country!
they should Ban religion 4 good if all cart see religion is a bad thing at least tax it to the poor house and but a age limit on it like smoken and boze 21 age limit then see how meny want to beleave in it if they still want to beleave in the lie at least theycan make there mind up when they are 21 years old as long as 2 men or 2 woman love each other its ok
eyeopenerQ2 3 years ago
ruth kelly and the pope are your superiors-obey them bitch!
realist91feb 3 years ago
no 2 free vote on embryo bill, shops should not make cigarets be out of site its a persons choice 2 smoke it undermines ppls intelligence and i don't smoke, lack of discipline is down 2 parent nothing more
tomzzzzzzcasper 3 years ago
1) No one is more opinionated than a reformed smoker like myself. After having smoked for thirty-three years, I quit thirteen years ago. I was to the point that I was smoking nearly three packs a day. One day I got up to find that I could not take a complete deep breath and could not blow out. I could not blow out a match!
holiday34691 3 years ago
4) Everyone has the absolute right to breath "smoke free" air. This right supercedes any possible right of anyone to smoke in public. When there is some wanker puffing away next to the entrance of a shop, I am then forced to breath second-hand smoke when I enter the shop.
holiday34691 3 years ago
3) I realized back then that the reason people had such difficulty quitting was because of "fear." It is the fear that you will be depriving yourself of something. I also realized that I was being "used" by the money grubbing bustards in the cigarette industry. I was done with allowing them to "use" me for their gain and I realized I was far too intelligent to finance their gold plated life styles.
holiday34691 3 years ago
2) That very day I quit "cold turkey" and have not had a cigarette in my mouth even once in the past thirteen years. For the first week, I kept the pack in my pocket and found myself automatically pulling it out and reaching for a cigarette. It took a long time to recover my ability to take a complete breath and I still can't blow out very well.
holiday34691 3 years ago
1) No one is more opinionated than a reformed smoker like myself. After having smoked for thirty-three years, I quit thirteen years ago. I was to the point that I was smoking nearly three packs a day. One day I got up to find that I could not take a complete deep breath and could not blow out. I could not blow out a match!
holiday34691 3 years ago
3)I realized back then that the reason people had such difficulty quitting was because of "fear." It is the fear that you will be depriving yourself of something. I also realized that I was being "used" by the money grubbing bustards in the cigarette industry. I was done with allowing them to "use" me for their gain and I realized I was far too intelligent to finance their gold platted life styles.
holiday34691 3 years ago
2) That very day I quit "cold turkey" and have not had a cigarette in my mouth even once in the past thirteen years. For the first week, I kept the pack in my pocket and found myself automatically pulling it out and reaching for a cigarette. It took a long time to recover my ability to take a complete breath and I still can't blow out very well.
holiday34691 3 years ago
1) No one is more appointed than a reformed smoker like myself. After having smoked for thirty-three years, I quit thirteen years ago. I was to the point that I was smoking nearly three packs a day. One day I got up to find that I could not take a complete deep breath and could not blow out. I could not blow out a match!
holiday34691 3 years ago
Totally agree with you on stem cells. Religious people loathe the idea of the relief of human suffering, if it goes against their insane beliefs.
On smoking, I totally DISAGREE. The only reason the NHS is in crisis is people smoke, drink too much, eat crap and no exercise. Anything gvt can do to boost UK's health is good thing. And smoking has to be the most unworthy 'freedom' to defend. What about the freedom of people who DON'T want to get cancer/heart disease to breathe clean air?
newminkey 3 years ago
It's not 'freedom of smoking' being defendeded, it's 'freedom of choice'. As I said, I support the smoking ban to a degree (because the right of people not breathing in smoke outweighs the right of smokers to smoke inside), HOWEVER, it went too far as it wouldn't even allow separate smoking rooms.
The extreme tax we pay on cigarettes more than makes up for the burden it causes to the NHS. And what next? Ban McDonald's? Make it a LAW that you have to be a member of a gym?
Ty for the comment! :)
MentalityUK 3 years ago
Defending 'Freedom of choice' as a general principle is utterly pointless without reference to the specific thing in question. Seperate smoking rooms????? What about employees who have to enter those rooms? Their freedom to breathe clean air counts for nothing? And the tax on cigarettes doesn't go anywhere near to compensating for illness and premature death caused to millions of people every year. Answer that!!!
newminkey 3 years ago
Who HAS to enter a smoking room? Apart from maybe a cleaner, who would have the right not to clean that room if they so wished (though all the cleaners at my place of work smoked!), I can't see who would be forced to go in? And the amount of time they'd have to stand in there is negligible.
That's the other irritating thing about non-smokers. They always exaggerate the damage a couple of minutes, or seconds, of breathing second hand smoke causes them....
MentalityUK 3 years ago
haha nice try MentalityUK, you defender of smokers. But all the science is against you on the passive smoking issue. It's the cumulative effect, not just one exposure.
While we're on the subject, nicotine man, here's some irritating thing about smokers:
cigarette butts all over the street, bad breath, stinky clothes, yellow fingers!
newminkey 3 years ago
..cont, it's not going to give you cancer or any other disease by smelling a bit of cigarette smoke for a couple of mins. It's such a fuss about nothing. It seems that non-smokers are deliberately stubborn and sit on their high horse with their holier-than-thou attitude, without ANY ROOM for compromise. Even when that compromise virtually eliminates any harm to you whatsoever, you still want to use the "it MIGHT hurt me IF I have to breath it at SOME point in time in the future" excuse!
MentalityUK 3 years ago
Here in Florida, smoking is totally banned in any place of business and all government buildings. The only exception is a bar (pub) that does not serve food. The problem with smoking rooms and areas is that in most buildings the air systems (heating and cooling) cannot totally prevent second hand smoke from being circulated throughout the building.
Didn't the French try to ban Mc Donald's? :○)
holiday34691 3 years ago
"Should shops be banned from displaying cigarettes?"
This question reminded me of something else I'd read about someone we all know and love:
House Resolution 1039, by state Rep. Sally Kern, R-Oklahoma City, calls on Oklahoma libraries to "confine homosexually themed books and other age-inappropriate material to areas exclusively for adult access and distribution."
I suppose displaying gay themed books will automatically turn kids gay?
Avenger0528 3 years ago
The news is nice mister, but the haircut is sweet, if not a touch gay! ;)
pdxboxer 4 years ago
Oh I don't know, I think the bouffant
makes him look slightly pixilated. :○)
holiday34691 4 years ago
haha, *blushes* the hair gets better once it grows a bit after they've sheared me like a sheep! Thanks for the comment(s)! xx
MentalityUK 4 years ago
Where this becomes a serious problem is should a cure or a medicine be developed because of stem sell research, we might have to pay exorbitant amounts because of patents obtained for such developments. Whenever we fall behind in science and technology we pay through the nose.
holiday34691 4 years ago
Here in the colonies, there is no ban on stem cell research, however there is a ban on federal funding of stem cell research. Without government funding, there might as well be a ban. What this means is that Great Britton and the United States will have to play "catch-up" some day. Why? Because Russia, China and all of the other world powers not encumbered by religious dogma dingbats will become advanced in this field.
holiday34691 4 years ago
hi there holiday34691 - good point about China - they're exploiting all economic opportunities to the max. China will overtake USA in around 25 years if not sooner. Imagine what a nightmare they would be if they were a religious country!
newminkey 3 years ago