@patrickJMT I am in the EXACT same situation. I knew all the material until we got to this stuff Greens, Stokes, Divergence, Line Intergrals............this is really helping. THANKS
Thank you very very much. You just saved my ass. You got a real talent and ability to get your message across. A very hard skill to have you should feel honored.
Thank you so much, I was going crazy over this until I saw your video. I could not understand my book's notion but yours was more understandable. Now's its easy!
can we just consider this as a vector function and evaluate the integral with (integral f dot dr). In this form can we always consider dx, dy dz as i j k respectively? Is there any exceptions or flaws to this logic? The only difference that I see with this formula and the formula that you have used in the video is skipping the process of writing out the vector F dot r ' (t)
Thanks a million!! I kept getting the limits wrong. I'm still not sure why they only go from 0 to 1 but whatev, I got my problem right. So, thanks again :]
@darcyjoann08 it's because we are interested in the line segment created by the two points. If we plug the bounds of 0 to 1 into the parametrized vector equation it yields the two points we used to make the line segment.
thanks alot these videos always help me very much!!!!!
moasfco11 2 months ago
whats the formua when they give you a different time. 0<t<5 for example?
tadm123 3 months ago
You sir should become a professor!
Jayc2592 3 months ago
Cal. 3 test Thursday...then finals next week. Videos are gonna get be through it .
devland14 3 months ago 5
@devland14 the final stretch! : ) good luck
patrickJMT 3 months ago 4
@patrickJMT I am in the EXACT same situation. I knew all the material until we got to this stuff Greens, Stokes, Divergence, Line Intergrals............this is really helping. THANKS
fwo4real 2 months ago
@devland14 David Manuel at A&M??
jjkim017 3 months ago
Can I use Green's theorem for this or is green theorem used only when the 'curve' is closed? Can anyone please answer this, I am confused a lot...
Thanks in advance
bharathsf 3 months ago
@bharathsf Only applies when curve is closed.
CastedAfar 3 months ago
@CastedAfar thank you :)
bharathsf 3 months ago
Thanks for this :-)
integraleric 8 months ago
*officially in love* love the accent too. totally understand green's theorem and such now, thanks!!
stephy414 9 months ago
These are incredibly helpful! Somehow everything you say makes sense!
Vote pJMT for God!
checkedpotato 9 months ago
Line integrals always confused me. I'll say that first.
1.) Could you (or someone) possibly explain how the parametrization equation (1-t)r_0 + (t)r_1 works?
2.) How did you know your bounds of integration were from 0 to 1?
3.) Could this problem also be solved using the Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals you talked about in a separate video?
Any answers are appreciated. I really want to understand this topic. :)
oatfarls 11 months ago
if its negative dont you have to say that it travels backwards along the line or something
patchesohola 11 months ago
At 4:11. Why is it integrated over 0-1? I never caught that. :P
himentourage 1 year ago
@himentourage Take a look at the equation parametizing t at 2:00 ....so t is always integrated over 0 to 1 :P
allensugar 1 year ago
@allensugar yea
patchesohola 11 months ago
Thank you very very much. You just saved my ass. You got a real talent and ability to get your message across. A very hard skill to have you should feel honored.
Again thank you!
k88n 1 year ago
i passed three semesters of my calculus only because of u!!!
anamtaj 1 year ago
THANKS SO MUCH!!!!!
Shazzbot112 1 year ago
@ChaosDynamics not quite, but thanks!
patrickJMT 1 year ago 5
@patrickJMT aww you're too modest, you really are god.
allensugar 1 year ago
Thank you so much! I could not figure out the simple parametrization method.
runawaymotor 1 year ago
YES!!!!! My teacher felt like just leaving out the equation on how to paramatize! Now it is clear..... Thank you!
thomashamiltom 1 year ago
You never let me down Patrick!
naetdogg007 1 year ago
Thank you!
MazurekM4 1 year ago
thank you so much a million times just got stuck in my problem sheet , until i saw this
leila59huang 1 year ago
Thanks, excellent as always!
jclwhite 1 year ago
Thank you so much, I was going crazy over this until I saw your video. I could not understand my book's notion but yours was more understandable. Now's its easy!
soulreaper41 1 year ago
can we just consider this as a vector function and evaluate the integral with (integral f dot dr). In this form can we always consider dx, dy dz as i j k respectively? Is there any exceptions or flaws to this logic? The only difference that I see with this formula and the formula that you have used in the video is skipping the process of writing out the vector F dot r ' (t)
VWinUgo 1 year ago
Could somebody illustrate the significance of line integrals? Why do we need to evaluate line integrals?
alven291 1 year ago
Thanks a million!! I kept getting the limits wrong. I'm still not sure why they only go from 0 to 1 but whatev, I got my problem right. So, thanks again :]
darcyjoann08 1 year ago
@darcyjoann08 it's because we are interested in the line segment created by the two points. If we plug the bounds of 0 to 1 into the parametrized vector equation it yields the two points we used to make the line segment.
VWinUgo 1 year ago
Thanks! Much clearer than any textbook! :)
niftyusername 1 year ago
I've been searching this kind of example for line integrals. Thanks very much Patrick!!! =D
muizhmhs 2 years ago
Nice...
pollardrho06 2 years ago
i can not smile without you
You're really a myth.
A smile makes us look younger while prayers make us feel stronger and friends? They make us enjoy life forever ..........THANX PATRICK
khalid97899789 2 years ago