Added: 1 year ago
From: DestinationCreation
Views: 1,023,718
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,695)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • pause at 0:17 then skip to 0:25

  • Reminds me of John McCain.

  • He IS real google Fred Olsen Mr Burns

  • scary...

  • This would look nice in a motion captur movie.

  • Grandpaa? :O

  • Grandpaa? :O

  • Still better looking than homer lol xD

  • scary

  • HOLY FUCK I JUST SHITED MY PANTS

  • Not too bad,but Mr.Burns isn't fat, the face should be thinner.

  • at 0:43 he looks like a evil moldy burger

  • he could pop ballons with his nose

  • so creepy

  • nahh just a troll

  • people need to watch this stoned! that was freaky

  • KILL IT WITH FIRE

  • Surely a picture of prince philip sufficed?

  • Gotta love PhotoShop! What an innovative program it is.

  • Yo dawg, we heard you like corrections, so we incorrectly corrected your sentence so you can correct our sentence while correcting our correction to your sentence.

    

  • i'd work for him :p

  • start with Wal-Mart CEO Mike Duke..he even does the finger pyramid evil contemplation thing

  • It's a grinch

  • THATS SHIT !

    Simpsons dont look like that scarry monster !

    Bad animation !

  • "were real" IS grammatically correct

  • cool ty for the vid

  • im gonna have nightmares tonight xD

  • 0:28 scared the shit out of me

  • *was real

  • @MrJoe000097 *were real.

  • @DestinationCreation *was real

  • @MrJoe000097 *were real.

  • @DestinationCreation You're both right...PREscriptively it should be 'were', DEscriptively it can be 'was''.

    :-)

  • @hollymarg no, only 'were' is actually correct. Yes, it's prescriptivist, but the reason it is 'was' descriptively is only due to popular usage, which doesn't make something correct. A more extreme example of this would be people mixing your and you're up; there, we can be descriptivist but it doesn't mean what's being said is correct...

  • @jdgannonable ...but doesn't language evolve? I mean, if we were to take the prescriptive route, wouldn't we be stuck with a language which is old English (pre-Norman, pre-Ango Saxon)? On the other hand, we have preferences/snobbery towards some forms which are in evolution. Consider prepositions which are still not completely fixed in English ...'think of/about', for example. And finally, which nationality speaks the 'best' variety/standard of English...in prescriptive terms?

  • @hollymarg Languages do evolve; of course, and indeed there is no 'best' response, however to be prescriptivist is to champion the form that has been established in popular usage the longest, and here the subjunctive does have a specific purpose, and in losing it we lose a shade of meaning from English that many languages still enjoy. However, I agree that language change is dictated by popular usage, so prescriptivism is a lost cause.

  • @hollymarg However, although I am perfectly content with language evolution as long as a language still fulfils its primary communicative function, one of my little irks is when people correct something that is actually correct in a language, but may have fallen out of popular usage due to, let's face it, linguistic ignorance - such as the 'was' vs. 'were' debate here. But maybe that's just me...:)

  • @DestinationCreation was real is gramatically correct actually*

  • @DestinationCreation *was real

    Conjugate the fucking singular past tense.

  • @MrJoe000097 it's 'were'...it's the subjunctive mood, here it's used to describe a situation that's hypothetical. I mourn correct usage of the English language at times.

  • @jdgannonable English is not my mother tongue and i dont have so much feeling for the language, but I thought it had to be 'was'. So its wrong in case I use 'was'??

  • @MrJoe000097 Hi - it's technically incorrect to say 'was' here for the reasons I mentioned, however the subjunctive mood in English has become somewhat obsolete recently, so you will hear people saying 'was' incorrectly, and although it shouldn't, 'were' indeed sounds quite formal and high register. So don't worry too much about using 'was'; most people won't think it's wrong. Although I do wonder why you were correcting grammar in the first place if you admit to having weaknesses yourself 8-)

  • @MrJoe000097 Were real. "Were is the subjunctive mood, and you use it for times when you're talking about something that isn't true or you're being wishful." - Grammar Girl

  • @MrJoe000097 antimoon.com/forum/2005/6314.h­tm

  • @MrJoe000097

    Both is correct. "Were" is, however, a bit more formal.

  • @Atheist2006 *are (sorry!)

  • @DestinationCreation was real ( i just wanna carry it on)

  • Comment removed

  • @MrJoe000097 Conditional Clause, *were real..

  • Never... Sleep...Again

  • Thanks for the nightmare fuel.

  • Reality Simpsons: If Mr. Burns WAS Real. Sorry had to say it

  • OH MY GOD

  • Dick Cheney!

  • wie scheiße es aussieht -.-

  • Persona,persona,persona,person­a. SOCIAL LINKS, SOCIAL LINKS, SOCIAAL LINKS

  • Persona,persona,persona,person­a

  • awesome

  • Excellent!

  • They should have used Larry King as a starter human.

  • @TallicLizzy - That would've been a bit too easy...

  • You hate-filled anti-semite! Talk to me when you've deficated on a solid gold toilet!

  • pff :D

  • Nixon, is that you!?

  • 0:21 SEXY ID TAP TAT

  • wtf...burn that man

  • KILL IT WITH WATER

  • excellent...

  • FUCK OFF WITH THE KILL IT WITH FIRE COMMENTS! IT'S NOT EVEN FUNNY AND NEVER WAS!

  • kill it kill it with fire

  • Do a Google image search for ex-Australian footballer Kevin Bartlett. He is the real life Mr Burns, no photoshop required...

  • KILL IT! KILL IT WITH FIRE!

  • @CrazyTheDk shut the fuck up dickhead

  • Dick Cheney?

  • AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA­AAAAA

  • Well......I didn't plan on getting any sleep tonight anyway....

  • The face of a true greedy bank manager or the jolly Tax man after he has all your hard earned money. Very scary :O

  • ihr eiernacken ich gebe euch karpfenschelle

  • I wasn't planning on sleeping anyway

  • but its not real ?

  • DICK CHENEY!!!!

  • excellent

  • I was expecting Rupert Murdoch, or David Rockefeller.

  • looks like one of my ex teachers from my old school

  • one thousand six hundred seventh

  • the nose and the teeth xD

  • yeah weird part of youtube

  • Mr Burns is based on a Norwegian guy called Fred Olsen. i know his brother who is a total cunt too.

  • Mmm.. sexy.

  • ITS UGLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • It's always the eyes!!!

  • post traumatic disorder... 0.0

  • wow this is so messed up... the clothes are all wrong...

  • Comment removed

  • It's ok I don't get that much sleep anyways.

  • This is why cartoon character's are cartoon's.

    

  • Quote :"Eeeexelent." With the evil twittling fingers.

  • Wow, this is really good music. What is it?

  • He look like a monster

  • Burns'es looks are taken from John D. Rockefeller Sr.

  • El Patron???

  • Comment removed

  • search for José Serra on Google and you'll see who is the real Mr. Burns! For curiosity, José Serra is a politician here in Brazil.

  • holy fucking fuck balls

  • pretty good job but Mr. Burns is supposed to be very, extremely skinny!

  • Scary... o_o

  • creepy

  • el guason xDD

  • Looks pretty jewish to me

  • 0:34 nightmare starts

  • 0:25 Troll Face

  • GUys you wont belive the dream i had about a guy who posted on youtube a video of Mr Burns in real life... Man that was something like.. Wait.. THIS DOESN'T FEEL LIKE A DREAM...

  • @xtuga 2/10 (lacks some humor) Nice try, nevermind though. Next time maybe you'll be funnier.

  • Whats real bout that?

  • My eyes

  • ahhh vilken snygging wööööm

  • he sees you while your sleeping...

  • that awkward moment when the top comments are about politics

  • is it just me or do all of them scare me

  • excellent (taps fingers together)

  • Worst. Music. Ever.

  • ugly as fuck!

  • if mr. burns was real, he would have been a troll living under a bridge somewhere

  • Mr.Burns is moutch skinnier

  • @yugo441, When did I say I was gay? And by the way, even though Im not, your being rude to the gay community. So what if someones gay?

    Child, you got to learn, I am not gay.

    And I was joking. My mom looks nothing like that.

    FOO!

  • looks like JEW

    

  • this a devil

  • I liked the part where you give me nighmares

  • oo shit I m scared :O :D

  • The weird side of Youtube.

  • Haha :) Good job :)

  • Not real enough. U R scaring me.

  • Well done, it's a little creepy though...

  • Hey I've got to say....welldone

    

  • This is the only good one..

  • 0:22. OMG when did my Mom get in here?

  • @Darkhood397 HAHAHA YOU'RE MOM LOOKS LIKE A BOY YOU MUST BE SO GAY LOLLLLLLL

  • O.O

  • this is a devil

  • Thums up if you lol'ed at 0:23

  • There already is a real-life version of Mr Burns. He's called Bernie Ecclestone. Not so much looks-wise but their characteristics are the same.

  • What is the song ?

  • deine mutter

  • phahahahahahahahaha

  • Good ole fashioned nightmare fuel

  • Looks like a Jew to me...

  • am i the only one who thinks "cheese gromit cheese"

  • Comment removed

  • That is fucking scary.

  • loooool

  • Rupert Murdoch looks the most like Burns now.

  • 0:33 creepy

  • 0:33 creepy

  • I don´t think mister burns have a chin

  • Press 1, then 8. Press 1 again... Then 8.

    I don't see ANY resemblance whatsoever... 

  • lock your door tonight because he will open it with his nose

  • If Cheney fucked the vampire from salem's lot

  • lol he looks a tiny bit like scrooge!!!!!

  • 0:29 first i was like: "aww! cute google eyes o.o ♥"

    five seconds later i was like: "O___O"

  • narrow the face and you got it.

  • he looks funny at 0.36

  • Ah, nothing like a elderly man with jaundice who has incisors larger than his ears.

  • creepy

  • guy who did these real life simpsons sucks so much but this is kind of cool

  • Epic !! :O ♥

  • Excellent!!

  • incredible!!

  • I an scared that gave me nightmares you son of a bitch !

  • 0:8 Now stop tellin' lies!

  • So Mr. Burns would look like John McCain?