Added: 3 years ago
From: WarCrime911
Views: 1,675
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (102)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hey Moron, a little bit of smoke and a few burned trees is not your typical crash site. They usually leave mile long scars and tons of debris, not a hole in the ground the USGS recorded in pictures in the 80's nor a quarter of a waste container of debris. Do you know how large these planes are???

    Where's the luggage??? You can find hundreds of photos of well documented air crashes of passengers jets this large and the devastation they leave behind is at least 100 times of what you show here.

  • @WarCrime911 Oh, and I didn't mean you. I understand what you're saying. I mean what ever moron that believes this garbage.

  • I can't believe there is a WarCrime911 video that I don't like.

    The video not only doesn't deal the the evidence of planes being at the WTC but instead is 6-minutes of images taken from the supposed crash site of F93.

    Being that this video is oooold and one of the first I'd like to hear thoughts on this site after the years of research on the matter.

  • Not one bit of photographic proof at all here ! I think I have WarCrimes911 all

    figured out ...lol I think I smell shill

  • This video is a total waste of time. Some good comments though. I have resently startet looking at this No Plane theory and the TV news does look very strange. Like the WTC7 building reported to be collapsed before it did. So who know. Why some truthers is so relutant to speak about the fake tv news and the chance of missiles hitting the towers instead of planes does make me think.

  • Can anyone say corodite? LOL Anyone military on here can tell u that! FYI, did anyone here know that the crater and 'wing scars' already existed 20 years ago :)

    Go look it up and see pictures from 1996 of that SAME CRATER AND WING SCARS.

    Not much of a conspiracy, just use your eyes and not your retarded version of 'patriotism'.

  • The 9/11 Commission NOW reveals that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The sources and details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.

    Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.

  • @Tarn

    DID YOU KNOW? Out of the 6 supposed hijackers, who weren’t found alive in other countries. 4 of them were given their Visas by top US Gov Officials. There is an interview with Michael Springman - 'Chief of Visa Selection at US General Consulate in Jeddah 87-89' who gave the "terrorists" their visas. He admits how they did not meet standard protocol, but the US gov pushed them through anyways to get the terrorists in to the US for air training. His Interview @ watch?v=F9-IISF4ckg (at 4:30)

  • FBI Admits No Evidence on Bin Laden

    On Jun 5-2006 author Ed Haas contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation headquarters to ask why, while claiming that bin Laden is wanted for multiple events, but not 9/11!

    Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI responded, The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Ladens Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11. Tomb continued, Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11

  • @Tarn1968

    First off it is the burdeon of the government to prove it was a terrorist attack. It is the government that needs to provide the evidence. This is the problem, they have not and cannot proved it. As it did not happen the way they said it did.

    If you want the evidence it did not happen the way they said it did just look at the videos here on youtube. Look at the science. Listen to pilots and firefighters speak. Those are proffessionals.

  • * Undeniable - 100% Proof of Molten Steel and Explosives. @ watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU

    Neither fires nor a collapse could create molten steel. Even NIST admitted that the temperatures needed to create molten metal and merge steel together - could not have happened due to the official explanation of the collapse

    Debunkers skip what they cannot explain:

    A straight forward video of NIST discussing this, and the irrefutable evidence of Molten Steel. I hope you actually check into both sides of the debate

  • "The FBI's counterterrorism division concluded that the evidence presented by the [Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth] deserves FBI scrutiny. In a letter, Deputy Director Michael J. Heimbach assessed that the group's analysis is "backed by thorough research and analysis."

    Please watch - Zero (A Nobel Prize Winner's 9/11 Documentary) @ watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA

  • Members of the 911 Commission said it was a cover up. They were not allowed to look at a large amount of the evidence, and they had higher ups choosing what evidence they could see or not. Also over 41 US counter terrorism veterans agree that it is a cover up and inside job.

    Senator, Max Cleland openly complains about how he was barred from seeing much of the evidence used to make the official story. He is outraged. Source of his CNN interview @ watch?v=LWE58Z5evgw

  • Tarn

    So you're argument is that 49+ CIA, FBI and US Counter intel agents just wear tin foil hats? What a great contextual argument you have there. Also they said no evidence on Bin Laden

    Many US Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agent Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11: "a Cover-up," "a Joke" "Terribly Flawed," "Laced with Contradictions,"

    Gov SOURCES: PatriotsQuestion911(DOT)com – (DOT) = “.”

    Please watch - Zero (A Nobel Prize Winner's 9/11 Documentary) @ watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA

  • Out of the 6 supposed hijackers, who weren’t found alive in other countries. 4 of them were given their Visas by top US Gov Officials. There is an interview with Michael Springman - 'Chief of Visa Selection at US General Consulate in Jeddah 87-89' who gave the "terrorists" their visas. He admits how they did not meet standard protocol, but the US gov pushed them through anyways to get the terrorists in to the US for air training. His Interview @ watch?v=F9-IISF4ckg (at 4:30)

  • FBI Admits No Evidence on Bin Laden

    On Jun 5-2006 author Ed Haas contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation headquarters to ask why, while claiming that bin Laden is wanted for multiple events, but not 9/11!

    Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI responded, The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Ladens Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11. Tomb continued, Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11

  • @Tarn1968

    I would assume you care, about the question you asked. Or else you post with no intent and waste your time? The question and proof you asked for is covered in the other video @ watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE

    I'm hoping you aren't full of hot air and will research this.

  • I dont get it. So are you saying terrorist really hijacked planes then? haha if the government did this they wouldnt need to shoot down a plane that was hijacked.

  • @Mr420woo,

    ROFLmao! You totally exposes the inept logic of debunkers! Who was the fighter pilot who intercepted Flight 93? Was he the "entire government"??? Was the entire government inside of the cockpit of that figheter jet with him? Were they sittinng in that cockpit and acting on the controls of that aircraft?

    The Air Force Pilot who shot down Flight 93, was acting AGAINST Dick Cheney's Stand Down order.... He protected his country, AGAINST his orders!

  • @WarCrime911

    "The Air Force Pilot who shot down Flight 93, was acting AGAINST Dick Cheney's Stand Down order.... He protected his country, AGAINST his orders!"

    really no offense, but had a fighter pilot shot down flight 77, there would still be major sections of the plane left over.. I am not asking you I am telling you, from personal experiences with seeing shit BLOW UP, while in Iraq!!!

  • @ct

    First off. I respect the amount of time and intellect you put into battling with jizzmonger and merlin and other shills. It is very crucial to allowing new comers to look and discuss the evidence in an open environment. Without getting attacked.

    I was exposed to the false flag of 911 in 2003. And the main reason I looked into it was on 9/11 I was listening to the radio. Multiple people called in from Penn saying they saw 3 military planes around flight 77 ready to shoot it down=cover up

  • @Bi0hazardx

    Sorry for the late reply, thanks for the compliment, I was just busy doing further research....

    These shills make me laugh....

    Keep up the good work spreading the truth, it always prevails!!!

  • @Mr420woo,

    You totally exposes the inept logic of debunkers! Who was the fighter pilot who intercepted Flight 93? Was he the "entire government"??? Was the entire government inside of the cockpit of that figheter jet with him? Were they sittinng in that cockpit and acting on the controls of that aircraft?

    The Air Force Pilot who shot down Flight 93, was acting AGAINST Dick Cheney's Stand Down order.... He protected his country, AGAINST his orders!

  • @WarCrime911 NOOO what im saying is that you're saying there was a plane. then you're saying muslims really hijacked planes then. am I wrong???

  • @Mr420woo, It was remote control planes. The "No-Plane" theories are just there to make us look stupid and crazy...

    Dov Zakheim was a member of PNAC who designed AWACS CTS Flight navigation and control systems for the DOD through his company Systems Planning Corp.

    If you google "Flight 77 Passenger List" you will find a dozen or so names of people with Top Secret clearances who allegedly died on that flight who were involved in Remote Control Aircraft technologies and/or Pentagon $Finance$

  • @WarCrime911 The problem with that is the System operates on UHF freqencies and was discontinued prior to 91101 due to interferance from television stations and other brodcast stations. This is why recently in 2009 all stations went to digital to free up that bandwith so really you have no clue about the whole system

  • @WarCrime911  Sheesh,,,you sound like that Cretin swu880

  • @WarCrime911 It was remote controlled planes? And the no-planers are trying to make You look stupid? I think you're doing a pretty good of that yourself. So you think there are lists floating around of people with top secret clearance against which we can validate the passenger manifests? Hey, if they had top secret clearance, don't you think they might have known that the flight was going to crash?

  • funnyman.

  • Are you able to point out any images in your video that show any signs of an airplane. I mean, more than just smoke, a crater, smoking trees, etc, but actual airplane/luggage/body parts. Do you think that at least 1 image of these would help your case?

  • WarCrime, the misfortune of the video and its title, is that you have just labelled yourself as a CIA Co-intel pro agent, by supporting the official theory of a plane crashing in Pennsylvania.

    I can see no bodies, seats, etc, no large scale debris, nor any significant impact on the ground except that suspicious looking configuation, kind of reminscent of a missle strike at the ground if you ask me.

    Yes sir, there were no planes, and indeed your the schill.

  • i think you should rename the video to "no planers are fucking morons"

  • so i guess i can dig a hole anywhere, set a fire in it and that is proof to you that a plane crashed there? where is the luggage? where are the engines? where is your self respect?

  • is this a joke?

    show me the two engines or shut up

  • Just because you say it was shot down warcrime, you suggest this makes it true? Prove it. The black box recorders, aircraft controller data and EYE WITNESSES say exactly the opposite. Why are you and your fellow pinheads so desperate for 911 to be a conspiracy? Bored? Lonely? Want to belong to something - join AA..

  • Are you talking about the same thing as this video? I see some small airplane parts, no bodies. Didn't the coroner say he has never seen one drop of blood from that plane?

  • i'd love to see some actual plane wreckage over there

  • 9/11 was a Pentagon scenario played out. see "Operation Northwoods"

    -Forget all that. Trying to demand truth about it is like Trying to Stop a Tiger by Grabbing its Tail

    Try Blocking it's Path Instead ie We Better Start WORRYING ABOUT THEIR NEXT FALSE FLAG ATTACK ON Us

    All indications promise that the Pentagon WILL VERY SOON DO IT AGAIN as a pretext to MORE WAR. In order to Blame the same innocent civilizations or pick a NEW govt to Villify

    "Bio terror from South America" Kills1,000,000

  • Look at the name - WarCrime911. I think that says all we need to know.

    Tell us how is the weather on planet Loon today?

  • watch?v=aUKLOlIhang&feature=re­lated

    these facts aren't going away.

  • Everything high school teacher David Chandler claims has been proven to be false and taken out of context. It is nothing but the babblings from a confused man. You on the other hand are just a sheep with your head stuck so far up your ass the lack of oxygen has done permeant brain damage.

  • can you be more specific? how do you take measurements of scattering debris out of context? how do you prove something isn't following a trajectory which even the naked eye can see it is? are you saying that debris did not cause major damage to the winter gardens? it is one thing to just say ' ' that's a lie' but it is no use unless you can be specific about how you have dis proven something and who your sources are.

  • No, I am not going to be more specific. I don't have the time or inclination to argue with a loon, 911 debunking does a fine job. Your ridiculous "movement" has fallen apart.

    The real question here, what is wrong with you? Were you abused as a child? What seems to be the problem? Why would you pursue something so incredibly stupid? Why the deep seated anti American sediment?

  • you have already taken the time to 'argue with a loon' . i don't mind if you are unwilling to elaborate on your comment, but i don't see how spewing out venom and inane ridicule helps to argue the point that you are trying to make. if you have a problem with me, YOU have a problem.. know what i mean?

  • @ atlasobject

    " why the deep seated anti American sediment?"

    You are assuming that the people that own &control america are americans, or have loyalty to the people

    During WWll & immediately after, there was a stealth attack on all the major control components of the government & their tentacles are still today, turning your country into the lowest ranking western culture on the planet, thanks to the willfully ignorant & the dumbing down of the masses

    The US is merely their weapons system

  • Yeah Fredsis - I guess I wasn't wearing my tinfoil hat that day and missed the "stealth attack."

    Do tell us - how is the weather on planet Loon today?

  • @ atlast eject afist

    I thought you would like those words, "STEALTH ATTACK", like a child you ignore all the content that is important and where i could have used the words "infiltrate", it was the words "STEALTH ATTACK" that made your ego wake up and make for a cheap old school, out of date response.

    And that probably makes you one of those that think Bin Laden was responsible for 911. Let me guess, that was the day you 'were' wearing the tinfoil hat ?

  • hahaha so i am cia cointelpro agent :)

    every planepart has a unique id-number and all parts are documented until they get removed and turn into garbage:)

    name me one part with a positive identified id number of any part of a plane wich was recovered on any of the 4 places:)

    no planes on 911 , not a SINGLE ONE

  • No plane hit the pentagon.... no plane hit the field in shanksville...

    However plane DID hit the trade centre. There were THOUSANDS of witnesses to the 2nd strike... all eyes were on the towers for the 2nd strike.

    This is true info mixed with disinfo... come on man, get real. Are you gonna say 1000s of witnesses to the 2nd strike are lying?

  • thats what we get told from the media but when u start digging it turns out that u cant find a single person who says he saw a plane hitting the towers.others turn out to be related to the media as ALL FIRST HAND eyewitnesses in the live broadcast who got interviewed in the first minutes.this is a media con they wont show u the ppl who said they saw a missile.

    they staged fake interviews and let ppl say scrpted things.

    whats with the pentagon witnesses?

    arent they hundreds who saw a plane?:)

  • I could believe that if there wasn't many looking up at the towers as they burned.

    I think it's best to stick to the stuff that's more easily proved...

    WTC7 - freefall (2.25 seconds confirmed by NIST)

    No plane in shanksville

    Nanothermite in the dust

    In my opinion...

  • i thought the same way years ago,when i heared first time someone talking about no planes in ny.

    i thought:what is this bullshit now?how in hell can anyone come forward into public and say, there was no plane in ny???

    today i cannot believe how easy it was to make me think there was a plane,when in reality there is nothing wich suports this except the endless repeating of the ppl saying thousands saw it.

    yes thousands saw it BUT ONLY IN TV.

    they saw an explosion and some reported a missile

  • Does anyone else look at the bucket of old bones at 3:55 and think "What a load of bullshit".

    9/11 The Biggest Lie in History

  • Actually its the second biggest lie.

  • You're right I forgot about religion.

  • Very good.

    It's nice to see that kind of intelligence.

    Very rare these days.

  • "This is a collection of pictures showing Flight 93"

    -sidebar

    Well, where was it?  You forgot to show it?

  • Voiceless, By by nutjob!

    Go do some study lad.

    See ya in 20 years when you know what your talking about and retract all you stupid comments you made.

  • I REALLY do not think this music is appropriate. If you want to display what you call evidance then do it without this music. :(

  • Looks like someone just shot a missile in to the ground??

  • Great work WarCrime :) nice music score yer funny...

  • I keep wondering who owns the land there at that site. When I was out there it seemed a large business owns it. I have to question if there is a connection of the landowners with anyone in power. Seems no one has followed this.

  • Also I'm not saying there wasn't a flight 93, in any way. I'm just saying it doesn't make sense on a logical stand point. Flight 93 was also reported to have landed in Cleveland Hopkins International Airport on 9/11.

  • Well, I agree with you on stopping the whole "no plane hit the towers." But this is a little bit different, look at plane crashes that have had happened in the past to present. There were always bodies, blood, debris etc. in the cases of plane crashes I've seen. Why in this "special" case the debris field is ridiculously spread out ? & there wasn't much debris seen to begin with? & I still haven't seen any evidence of bodies at the "Crash" of flight 93.

  • If you fly a plane into something hard enough, there will be nothing recognisable as plane or person left.

    The general term is "going in under power" or "controlled flight into terrain" planes are not meant to hit things at great speed and the same goes for people. That's why the site has been escavated, as a lot of the debri has embedded itself in the ground due to the force of the impact, the people are there, just very compacted and chared. You do not see blood if there has been fire. AME

  • Um... yah which is why there were no debre's recovered... and how fast was the plane flying again here? About; nearly 100mph; that hardly constitutes as something along the lines you state.

  • IamtheVOICE123, So please tell me first, what is your background in Aviation?

    Lets use your example for now, lets say I put you in a car made of Aluminium and accellerate you to 100mph into an imoveable wall of dirt, shall we take bets on how much of you there is left? did you study physics at school? Have you ever been to a car or aircraft crash site?

    What would be the vertical speed of an airliner falling out of the sky, do you want to check your numbers?

  • Yeah I did my numbers, and orbit violecity in my freaking head. It's a fucking no brainer. The orbital volecity it would be would only be increased by about 5-10 mph at the most at which it executed the vertical dive into it.

    Secondly; it doesn't take an aviation expert with years of training to understand that the statement is absolute bullshit. What was the height the plane was falling? about 4 miles above ground zero.

  • IamNOTthevoice, What the hell are you talking about, you don't make sense.

    Yes it does take an Aviation expert you wanker, you consider yourself worthy of doing Aircrash investigations do you?

    Answer the question-Have you ever been to a high velocity crash?

  • You never asked me that question; you asked me to do the numbers and yes I did do my numbers and I gave you a solid fact. All one needs is the basic knowledge of kenetic energy, flight path movement, and just the above basic understand of crash physics and there you have it. All of which are taught to you in the very first few lessons. But to answer question, no I was not... what does that have to do with anything? I've seen pictures of comercial airliners hitting it at highspeed orbital speeds

  • Voice123, If your physics skills are as good as your reading I rest my case.

    I did ask you that mr smartarse, it has a lot to do with EVERYTHING idiot.

    orbital speed? what the hell are you talking about, this isn't the spaceshuttle. I have more years of experience in Aviation than you have been alive, are you shore you want to get into this?

  • Ah yes waving your credintials around like it really means anything. Ever known that Bill Gates... a Multi-Billionair software designer, part of the ECO science team that was able to help build one of Intel's first CPU's and personally designed the software suites used in huge multi-million/billion $ corporations was a college drop out? Credentials only allow you to be taken seriously and even then it only takes you so far.

  • Secondly, I would have used the term Orbital Velocity but I ran out of space so I shortened it. And Orbital Velocity accounts for objects going out and into our gravity system; and also accounts for objects falling from a specific area, point, and time in the sky.

  • VOICE, Look you are only making a fool of yourself, go away and study some Aviation and come back later."Credentials only allow you to be taken seriously" i don't need to say much, you are doing a really good job of shooting yourself in the foot. I had a shitty first ten years of my life, failed year 10 but then got determined when I was told I couldn't be a flight engineer, now I am that and more-I came from the back and worked hard to be able to know what I'm talking about. Your point was?...

  • So this is your rebuttle? Ad Hominem attacks and Straw Men, along with a sad sap story? I'm sorry if I don't believe you but nowadays you cannot believe anyone on the internet. In reality; I have debunked your explanations answered to your scheme and yet the moment I started you resort to these tactics?

  • LameVOICE123, Right, youve pissed me off now! "Sad sap story" you little prick, what have you done with your life?

    Quote me one Aviation text you have studdied and no it can't be YT or anything internet, must be a book or college notes. I am well aware there is a lot of bull on here, but I have no need to lie, I am what I am and if you knew anything about the subject you would be able to tell.

  • The only reason why I refuse to divulge in your little game here is because you have expressed in nothing constructual based. I have seen this being done by many people on the internet in the Mac vs. PC debate and the creationist arguments against science and your following the very same pattern. Sorry but I really don't buy your story, nor your little game. Delt with it before. At any case I still have to finish setting up my computer so good day.

  • Voice, Go and ,,,uck your self! I am not playing, definatly not a creationist, I suggest you cut back on the Weed!

    Come back when you know what your talking about (and grown up).

    You really are an AH

    I wouldn't let you anywhere near a computer your too stupid. Keep your mouth shut when you don't know the topic-wanker.

  • Ah yes this is whart it comes down to it. Calling out your tactic; seeing for what it is you resort to name calling and childish Ad Hominem attacks.

  • Voice, I thort you said you had a computer to mutilate?

    Please promise me you will never study and go to work as a Flight Control Computer programmer! The last thing we need is more aircrashes.

    Lay of the Weed, its messing with your head

  • More Ad Hominem attacks yet again. Oh and don't worry, I plan to either go into videogame designing, or maybe designing software for 3D engineers for physics. Can't decide which would be better suited for me. I do like both subjects.

  • Voice, You do repeat yourself, I'm glad yor not interested in flight. Let me help you decide-NIETHER, I have friends who work in phys and they like to have equipement that works.

    I'm guessing you believe in UFO's?

    Moon landing being a fake?

    2012, chemtrails, toothfairy, santa, m I getting warm yet sonny!

  • Um... for me I do believe that life exists on other planets; but the evidence has yet to be found. No I don't believe the Moon Landing was fake, the whole thing with the Maiyans is bullshit and just a hyped up shit... not sure what yah mean by chemtrails; and what does childhood shit have to do with this argument... again Ad Hominems. The reason I repeat this is cause thats all your doing.

  • Voice, Well you've surprised me!

    Chemtrails are another nutjob theory.

    Why the f......g hell are we argueing, you clearly have a brain. If you want to make comments on something like this go and get educated on it (not on YT) I'm too old for this shit, it just fustrates me that people without any abckground come up with these aligations. Be scientific about it-neutral

  • And I would guess from your comments that JFK was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald?

    Get a grip... learn to seperate fact from fiction...

    9/11 was an inside job. Scientific fact.

  • Don't believe the "truther" lies about Flight 93 being the "first plane crash in history" not to leave significant large pieces of wreckage. It isn't.

    watch?v=ff7h7Ll8Dl4

  • shot down.

  • 5 boxes of tiny pieces of shrapnel! look at any other plane crash. Wheels, Engines, Bodies. There is NOTHING identifiable in this picture.

  • Debris was found 3,6 and 8 miles from the impact crater. No large debris and they say the dug up the engine. I think if anything it was shot down. As far as the no planers, this bothers me, I mean there are quite a few of these people that will argue that there was no planes. It causes desention in the fight against the NWO and the fight for 9/11 truth. I wonder if things like Alien conspiracies, reptiles and other esoteric conspiracies are designed to hurt real truth?

  • The Reptilian Alien Theories are definitely B.S.

    The BBC did a special on the New World Order and they had David Icke talk about Reptilian Aliens the whole time and then used that to debunk the entire NWO Conspiracy!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more