Stodles Reveals Himself

[turnbacktime]

does stodles have a new account

[theganonslayer]

@turnbacktime He's fringeelements nowadays. To see the recent controversy, visit the antifringeelements channel (brainpolice2's new channel since stodles hacked his channel) and watch his videos and his favorites. Disgraceful behavior in my opinion.

[regratex]

stodles.. ever since someone sent me a video with the message "hey watch this" 2 years ago, I have been unable to click on any subsequent shared videos. What did I watch? Stodles stroking one off.

[Azriencock]

@regratex

From his early and lonely beginnings, making videos contending that race was a valid, anthropological construct and producing whack off vids, he became a doc-dropper and self-important anarchist on youtube.

I am simply shocked and dismayed with his progression. Shocked, I say. What does the future have in store for our young Stodles? Only time will tell, my friends. Only time will tell.

[gratex]

@Azriencock

what progression? his channel is suspended.

[Azriencock]

@gratex

It is now fringeelements. You didn't really think Stodles would just disappear into the night, did you?

[vaguelyhumanoid]

Stodles is basically the Chris-Chan of the libertarian blogosphere.

[2k0ol1]

@vaguelyhumanoid

who is chris-chan? and who is stodles? 

[geminidublinRETURNS]

Stodles all the way in 2012 !!!

[C4INED]

I thought this video might help me find out who stodles is ? but no , so if anyone can take the time or be bothered to inform me then that would be great , from what i hear though he is just a disinformed muppet nerd with too much time on his hands and a bit to the nazi conservative far right LOL , what a self loathing waster he must be ......

[2k0ol1]

@C4INED wtf? dude im with you, who is stodles?

[Rahab111222]

Stodles is a failure.

[asdfgasdfasdful]

You are "associating" with him... by making videos responding to his videos. Consult a dictionary.

[XOmniverse]

I don't interact with him directly.

What was your goal with the comment you made? What did you intend to achieve with it?

[asdfgasdfasdful]

Videos regarding other videos is as "direct" as it gets via video.

I intended to comment. There was no particular goal..

[XOmniverse]

You're lying.

[asdfgasdfasdful]

You're incorrect.. and you're being a jerk.

[XOmniverse]

You made a comment that was intended to degrade me by basically calling me an idiot, then you try to claim that your action somehow had "no motive" when I called you out on it, but I'M being a jerk.

Look, if you dislike me, go somewhere else. But I'm not going to tolerate what is obviously bullshit, and I'm not dumb enough to believe you when you act like an ass and deny it afterwards.

[asdfgasdfasdful]

I don't "dislike" you, bud, and I have no interest in "degrading" anybody. I found your video via related videos and pointed out what I saw as a pertinent error in language. If you can't take substantive criticism without perceiving it as a devious personal attack, I would personally suggest you detach yourself from the tube for a while and take a break.

[XOmniverse]

Your goal was to somehow smear the content of the video by pointing out a definition error. Your final statement, "consult a dictionary", is basically asserting that I don't know what a simple word like "associate" means and is an attack on my intelligence.

My problem with you right now has nothing to do with whether I misused the word, but rather with the undertones behind what you were saying, and the fact that you denied them afterward.

[asdfgasdfasdful]

Again, your presuming to know some conscious and devious goal behind my rather mundane actions is unsafe as I have better information regarding that and am under the distinct impression that no such goal existed.

How about this: what are you trying to achieve by your oddly aggressive and random interrogation? What is *your* goal?

[XOmniverse]

My goal is to make it clear that I don't tolerate asshole behavior and to get you to either retract it or leave.

[asdfgasdfasdful]

Uh why would I retract what is technically correct? Directing you to consult reference materials in order to confirm the accuracy of a definitional point is not a personal attack and was not meant as such. Are viewers not allowed to criticize the substance of your videos?

[XOmniverse]

You keep pretending like your goal was innocent criticism, but your tone revealed otherwise. I gave you one opportunity to admit that you were being an ass, but you instead chose to continue to be dishonest about your intentions.

Of course people can criticize the substance of my channels, but they don't have to be asshats about it. I've given you enough opportunity to not be an ass; you're blocked.

[chorizo1337]

where can i find this convo for the lulz?

[Sepero1]

If I was Kathy's father, I might not be cool with aaron "boosting her self-esteem" in this way.

[IndividualAutonomy]

Thats cause you have old timer views :)

[SSENGNIHTON]

Where is Stodles?

[TheBigBadWoIf]

probably somewhere masturbating in front of a camera

[modelmark]

stodles; a pest control test case

[jim30333]

What if you are the Kwisatz Haderach? Racist! You have to think of these things.

[PerennialLucidity]

he's the worst kind of racist moron, the kind that's actually a really bright and intelligent person who inexplicably has crazy white supremacist views. i'm really baffled at the fact that he's such a smart guy and doesn't understand the basic idea that the melanin content of your skin has no correlation to your right to be treated with basic human dignity.

[stealthswimmer]

What white supremacist views?

[chorizo1337]

k, except there are differences between races, and he probably just had pride in his white roots. why do liberals demonize whites for liking their race/racial pride?

[ngIasers]

The girl should have went to her parents so they could gather info and go through proper authorities. People are innocent until proven guilty because we don't know the context and honest misunderstanding occur.

Stodles doesn't care if he wrecks the man's life, puts his coworkers out of business and uses a young girl to do it because he is a sick, narcissistic opportunist.

[ngIasers]

Stodles is an opportunist. He is not a white nationalist, anarcho-capitalist or even a moral nihilist.

He is also a demagogue trying to destroy his critics. I hope he likes my channel.

[Cailwyn]

I like stodles, but this might cross my personal line.

But, I can't really defend Aaron, as he has crossed that line over and over again with his amateur psychologising. If you don't want to get dirty then don't play in dirt.

Aaron has repeatedly attacked the characters of those who don't agree with him with his blanket, amateuristic profiling, and even when I've tried in the nicest way possible to respond to these attacks, he simply deleted my comments.

[Cailwyn]

I use to really like Aaron. He was one of the first people I subscribed to. I've taken special care to be cool towards him because I realise he's a very sensitive dude.

I could maybe even overlook his dishonest tactics if he hadn't, in the process, personally attacked the characters of everyone who disagrees with him, including myself.

It's hard to defend someone so hypocritical.

[brainpolice2]

What it reveals is something that's been obvious from attack videos long before this: stohdles obcessively digs for personal information on people who disagree with him and attempts to publically shame them and intimidate them, who is unable to have a debate without extreme personalization entering the picture. What it says about those who approve it is that they are so attached to their side of an ideological fence that they derive pleasure from seeing other people personally destroyed.

[chorizo1337]

thats funny, he never did this to the amazing atheist

[SBRslacker00]

@brainpolice2

Funny how the current events shade a video like this one.

[IamPUDDiiN]

single bed at 40 ?

[D4Shawn]

Actually, I had a lot of influence on how the current crop of anarchists around here think. What a lot of people are saying now, I was saying a long time ago. I was one of the first (or maybe even THE first) libertarian/anarchists around here to go rogue and throw "morality" out with the bathwater, so really, you have no idea what you're talking about. Thanks for trying though.

[brainpolice2]

Why don't you also boast about being one of the first people to reveal yourself as a psychopathic asshole that uses intimidation tactics andshames people in comments?

[D4Shawn]

*yawn*

[RyanFaulkF]

It seemed like the whole "moral nihilist" meme was just a reaction to your finding out of Stefan Molyneax was the piece of crap that he is. I thought it was a fickle thing at the time. I guess I, RyanFaulkF, just grabbed a hold of it and made sure it spread out through the youtube community, so I could indoctrinate and inculcate my moronic drones(ModelAnarchist, NoCryingNowYes, nglazers, Enddepravity, etc.)

[MaikUniversum]

Did Stefan attacked you directly that you call him names ? Or I you just butthurt because of his arguments ?

[RyanFaulkF]

Stefbot actually doesn't make good arguments. He is just really good at arguing in real time, and there is a fine distinction between the two. Stefan is excellent at sneaking in non-sequiturs, and can pan-handle any honest debater with the Socratic method, but in the end, Molyneax has shown himself to be deceptive, and manipulative, and can't handle debate in nearly any other format, which is why he locks threads and blocks people that come to his forums that create good arguments.

[MaikUniversum]

well, I kinda agree, it is one of his "flaws", though, he is a good philosopher.

[Kbiomech]

Stodles/Ryan.. whatever.

I've enjoyed your philosophical videos and posts quite a bit. When you're not off on some weird tangent, you make a lot of sense.

But you attack people. Not their arguments. I've stayed out of it, even defending you before, but...

IT DOESN'T MATTER. Attack ideas, not the men who hold them. There is a very good reason that ad hominem is a fallacy. And frankly, YOU know it!

oh, and don't say it's still a valid tactic. I know that.

[Kbiomech]

But it's only a valid tactic if your sole goal is to win by points, concession, or forfeit. If you want to win a war of ideas against a huge, entrenched, multilithic nightmare that controls most of the media, it's not a valid tactic.

And again, You, personally, know this to be true. It's obvious in your writings that you're very intelligent.

But you set out to piss people off who are not your enemies. Just remember that while friends come and go, enemies accumulate.

I said my bit. I'm done.

[DeraJa]

what 14 year old doesn't have self esteem problems, nothing to be ashamed about.

[EdwardMandellHouse]

Yea, Stodles has real issues.

[GentileReadingList]

You didn't get 5 or 6 replies from 5 or 6 different people, you got 5 or 6 replies from 5 or 6 of stodles' many personalities/sock puppets.

[UcanbeGOD]

I don't care if Aaron and Rose do want to fuck a 14 yr old. If the 14 year old goes there then she made the decision.

[Shezmu]

You know what, you (xomni) should thank stodles. He singlehandedly proved the point behind your videos "thick libertarians" AND "Anarchists are stupid" better than you could at the *same* time!

[drew335533]

Hmmmm, XOmniverse. Have you watched CS' video titled "youtube"? He said in that video word for word "I want to make this corner of youtube as bad as it can be". I'm honestly not sure where the intentions of his actions are there and why he is so intent on just making things miserable for us. I think one could make the argument this quote says something about his character, that perhaps because we don't agree with him he has to make our enviornment as bad as possible. I support your website.

[XOmniverse]

I think his recent behavior tells you everything you need to know about his character.

[drew335533]

True. Trying my best not to suck up here, I like your approach to this situation. I admire how you aren't trying to fuel the situation or make it worse just for the humor of it. I wonder if the former anarchist community on youtube is going to just go our seperate ways. I wouldn't mind checking your website out over thanksgiving though, it would be a nice break from this enviornment.

[tiecuando]

God damn it, I don't even care as long as she's over 13!

[XOmniverse]

He's completely relying on the fact that other people have ethical views that sex with a 14 year old is wrong in order to make Aaron look bad.

In a way, it's more despicable than if he actually believed it was wrong, because he can't even claim to be outraged at Aaron's conversation; for him, it's completely just a means towards the end of damaging Aaron in any way he can, even if it means hypocritically appealing to other people's moral viewpoints that he personally rejects.

[brainpolice2]

Yes, he is appealing to other people's moral viewpoints as a means to an end. But this isn't something new for him. It goes back to his "shelling points" strategy that he posted as a blogpost on my blog before I ejected him from it. He's done this before in other contexts.

[ithinkronpaulissmart]

I don't see why you should ever have to defend choosing to dissociate with another person regardless of your reasons or justifications.

I've always liked stodles, but lately his conduct has been disgusting.

[PoliticalPhilomather]

your only hurting the cause. and i know... we dont agree on what "the cause" is but come on- are we arguing like little bitches or are we trying to invoke social change?

get off your high horses and fucking think about the real problems and how you can help THEM. not gloat over what YOU have a problem with.

(i am posting this for both parties involved)

[XOmniverse]

Are you asserting that my primary concern should be "the cause" and not people doing this kind of pretty shit towards friends of mine?

[brainpolice2]

Your neutralist view on this matter is skeed, politicalphilomather. Viewing this as two sides engaging in the exact same tactics is beyond ridiculs. Stodles s making an endless series of video attacks on people at an extremely personal level, digging up personal information on them and deliberately trying to tarnish hir reputations in real life. The idea that the people he is attacking have remotely stooped the same level is absurd.

[PoliticalPhilomather]

it's SAD that this "community" in which i used to gain so much knowledge and understanding from has become so petty and focused on themselves and "how they feel" about shit that there are now plenty of reason for the non-anarchist community to not take "us" seriously.

[ExistentialExistent]

5 stars

[lengthyounarther]

I've pretty much had to stop watching stoddles and several others because its become to petty to endure. However I'm fairly sure Aaron has disclosed details about his business in the past.

[theVAGINAntichrist]

Certain people on the internet are held in high regard by trolls due to the way they behave; stodles is one of them.

[Surhotchaperchlorome]

I can't find your comment on the video in question.

[ks100001]

He mentioned my comment in his "Youtube" video.

Ryan is a major disappointment.

[D4Shawn]

I don't know dude.... 14/15 years old is stretching it a bit. I believe that anyone should be able to talk to anyone about anything. However, when you actually proposition someone that age, and ask then to stay with you and remove their clothes... you've got to be crossing some king of line. And I say this as one of the most perverted people out there. Even I would fuck a 14-year-old.

[D4Shawn]

*even I WOULDN'T fuck a 14-year-old.

Wow. That was a pretty bad typo.

[ExistentialExistent]

lol

[sharperguy]

It disappoints me now that I have to side with stoddles on the actual debate (objective ethics) while simultaneously him conducting himself this way.

And it's not as if aaron was much better, I was seriously grossed out by his whole "asshole licking" metaphor especially when he was completely wrong.

It's such a shame that young people (of which I am one), the main people who are in the position of challenging social norms for the better, are also cursed with this childish bickering.

[XOmniverse]

I would've ignored it if the video didn't try to link this bullshit to Aaron's personal business. That's going a bit far I think.

[sharperguy]

To be honest I've been subscribed to you for longer than anyone else involved in this and you are very much less to blame for this than others.

I'm probably going to be paying less attention to stoddles now anyway besides it doesn't seem like he has much new to say which I haven't already thought of.

[Shezmu]

Not to mention that he recently admitted that he will now act as nothing more than a troll in his called "youtube".

[D4Shawn]

You left out the part where Aaron invites Kathy to stay at his place as long as she remains topless during her stay. Trust me, aaron wants to fuck her. I'm not judging, I'm just pointing out a fact, and pointing out that you're not telling the whole story here.

[XOmniverse]

Are you suggesting that that wasn't a joke? Have you ever talked to Aaron for more than 2 minutes? He says shit like that to everyone all the time.

If I took his sexual comments like that literally, I'd be convinced that he was gay for me. And he's not, believe me.

[D4Shawn]

No. I don't think it was a joke. I think he is genuinely attracted to girls that age. I myself like younger girls (just not THAT young). I too like to seduce (legal) girls online, so I can see what he's doing. I'm not out to judge him, I'm simply pointing out that it should be obvious why people aren't exactly cool with that and thus are reacting the way they are. It takes a perv to know a perv, and aaron is definitely a perv.

[XOmniverse]

To be perfectly frank, you and Aaron have very different views on sexuality, so I think it's a mistake to assess his actions from your context, if that makes sense. He doesn't even approach it from the same direction that you do.

[D4Shawn]

If there's a difference, it's that I don't bother to wear sheep's clothing. I don't hide what I am and what I like.

[brainpolice2]

Actually, all you are doing is engaging in classic projection, while having no real knowledge of the context of the conversation.

[NeutrinoideReturns]

I think you are mixing the desire to fuck with the actually will to act on it . Which I agree that male will fuck a 14 year old. There is a huge leap to have the desire to act on it and feel the urge. Or everytime I'm looking to an women's ass I would have to tell myself i'm a rapist.

[NeutrinoideReturns]

Those new wave of nihilists sure are working hard to show how stupid ethics is. How about they start explaining why they are doing those videos. The gymnastic they will have to do to avoid the use of ethics. It would be fun to watch.

[XOmniverse]

I know right? Suppose I said "Fine, Aaron wants to fuck 14 year olds. So?" What could they say if they reject ethics? It's just an arbitrary preference, right?

They are clearly relying on the fact that people DO have a sense of right and wrong.

[NeutrinoideReturns]

Not only that. If they used this shallow process they believe to be thinking. They are maybe trying to make a point by showing how ethic is destroying Aaron`s business. But they will have to explain why they try to show this by comparing Aaron having food on the table or with him been broke on the street. Since they will have to compare a positive with a negative state of the individual.

[ExistentialExistent]

Yup, they think what Aaron did was immoral.

[tiecuando]

But morals don't exist! You can't use anything against them, even their own beliefs!

[NeutrinoideReturns]

How can I take the people seriously and talk like adult with them when we see people like Machinelegion and Father0Blivion ? That is without counting the 9 thumbs up? really?

[Shezmu]

I'd point out the obvious, but I'd rather not insult your intelligence and will instead post a quote of Swordsage that I agree with, "humans suck".

[ReceiveTheFlame]

longtime Xomni subscriber. not sure what is going on, but if any of these quotes people are posting are real then Xomni is being incredibly naive.

[XOmniverse]

I'm not naive. Aaron is someone I talk to on a regular basis, so I have a solid grasp on his views on things, how he interacts with people, etc.

I know he was not hitting on her (in fact, he is so infatuated with his girlfriend that I couldn't imagine him hitting on anyone).

[i2aymond]

This whole thing is starting to annoy me.

[trumasamune]

The vid was petty, but I'd also say it's fair game. I don't think this revealed anything about stodles to people who have watched any of his vids before. In the 2 years I've watched his yt vids he's been pretty consistent with the way he treats people.

Something tells me this vid would not have been made if Aaron hadn't made his. Let's try and stay consistent.

Also, legal implications!? Lol. You know an anarchist has a strong argument when he brings those up.

[XOmniverse]

I was angry, and to a degree it was a serious question. The law exists, whether me or Stodles or anyone else likes the fact.

Someone theoretically could get in legal trouble for something like that.

[Chrisnoscrub047]

Its possible if Aaron decided to try and use State law.

[fede2]

yeah, this is unheard of. what a disgusting little shit.

[Chrisnoscrub047]

hm. Stodles posted the conversation and the "context" so if Aaron's self-esteem boost was reasonable why would this do any harm to his business?

lol, also, on the east coast its later, and its sunday, (a lot of people don't work on Sunday) and people set their fantasy football lineups before the 1 o clock games. =)

[XOmniverse]

The problem is that most people do interpret discussing sexuality frankly with anyone under 18 as a sign of pedophilia.

In other words, Stodles is playing on other people's irrational prejudices and views on sexuality in order to damage Aaron's reputation. Mentioning his business is an attempt to damage his livelihood, as well.

[MachineLegion]

Talking about sexuality is one thing, but the dude was hitting on a 15 year old. Dudes pedo brah.

[XOmniverse]

When exactly was he hitting on her?

[Father0Blivion]

So saying "if you were older, me and my girlfriend would love to play with you" isn't hitting on the girl?

The guy's a serious creep, and the fact that you defend him so adamantly speaks volumes about your character.

I'd hate to pull this card, but where's your ethics now?

[XOmniverse]

I'm pretty sure adding the "if you were older" kind of makes it NOT hitting on someone. Hitting on someone is a deliberate attempt to engage in sexual activity with someone, which is NOT what occurred.

If you read the conversation, the primary focus was on Kathy's low self esteem, especially regarding sexuality and her view that she was not sexually attractive.

My ethics remain in tact. If you don't like them, go away.

[MachineLegion]

"you are seriously a cute girl ... your expressions are adoreable" But wait, there's more "if I were a single boy and you were 18 ... i would be super willing to date you. I am more picky about philosiophy and stuff, but you have a huge advantage over most other girls. So I would give it a shot" "Rose and I would welcome you if you needed a place to stay .... but there is a topless policy at my house"

[XOmniverse]

I don't suppose the fact that the last part is a joke occurred to you, did it?

When Aaron talks about Stodles licking his butthole, is that serious too?

[MachineLegion]

No shit its a joke. But when you combine that with everything else the dude said its perfectly fucking obvious he was hitting on her.

[WorBlux]

So what the hell is wrong with flirting? The girl could be married if she lived in Kansas, and is beyond any customary age of consent. (Usually between the age of 12 and 15.

[MachineLegion]

When the hell did I say I thought it was wrong? I was just pointing out that the dude is a pedo for hitting on a 15 year old.

[WorBlux]

Most cultures historically would consider a 15 year old to be an adult rather than a child.

We just have a weird culture where childhood is stretched out into this thing called adolescence.

[MachineLegion]

Its subjective, whats your point?

[WorBlux]

No it's and opinion based on facts of reality. The fact that it is so consistent would imply there underlying facts on which the opinions are based on.  It is the age at which sexual maturity kicks in as well as the desire to interact with the world on your own terms.

We consider other species as juveniles or adults on the basis of sexual maturity as well.

[ExistentialExistent]

"We consider other species as juveniles or adults on the basis of sexual maturity as well. "

Like with humans other species' developmental stages are ambiguous.

[ExistentialExistent]

We don't know exactly, exactly being key here, when to consider one an adult. There is ambiguity between the stages we create and project onto the species.

[ExistentialExistent]

For example, insects which go through 'incomplete metamorphosis' have obvious ambiguities between their three stages.

[CocoMac877]

to be fair historically bein 15 meant ud lived half ur life lol

[DeraJa]

@ Mach,

In order to be considered a pedo, you must be attracted to pre-pubescent children. The term absolutely does not apply.

[abortabraham]

You're looking at it all wrong MachineLegion, she was 14 at the time, not 15.