this fuck is bending himself into logical knots so he can claim "there is no external cause of the Universe" - almost as foolish as the multiverse garbage
face it you fucking lame ass twat: you DO NOT KNOW JACK SHIT
y'all realize this guy is as full of SH IT as any tv preacher?
he has NO IDEA for real about any of this crap and what the scientists "know" to a certainty today will be discarded in the future, and yet blithely continue to pontificate like this pockfaced fuck
i know wat they mean by flat, flat like flat home which is vast but flat in shape.
But how can big bang which supposed to create spherical universe, turns into flat universe. plzz anybody light on this statement. and how much 'flat universe' concept acquire acceptance among scientists community.
plzz can anybody explain in simple language that how can universe be flat in the light of big bang theory.
according to big bang theory universe is expanding since the big blast, that blast most probably extract masses in all direction, so this make it a spherical shape. So, according to big bang theory, universe must be spherical in shape, then how it become flat.
So in short our eyes deceive us,our earth is in a bubble of slowed time due to heavey gravity, if u lok from outside in everything will look slowed down, when lloking from inside out u only see the past, so everything we see are images distorted of the past, of how the galaxy was, u'd need to be outside the force field to se the real universe as it is.
For some reason every time I hear about 'dark matter' / 'dark energy' I think 'ether'. What makes this different from ether except that we can measure its need to exist? Could we simply be misunderstanding the universe in a way that makes it necessary to postulate dark matter and dark energy in place of something else?
i agree. i like the aether idea. it explaines the wave-like nature of the particles. and since the vacuum is not smooth and can be seen as a quantum foam? also, as you say, dark energy is sometimes called quintessence due to its similarity to the classical aether.
the word aether has negative connotations because of its past association to special relativity. nobelphysicist laughlin says that SpRe. presupposed the nonexistence of a space-medium while GeRe. conceptualizes it.
@songteller we will never know the whole truth. but so far this theory best describes reality. Now it is up to the observers/experimentors to verify or confirm what the theorists came up with. This is how science works, and it is the only way forward. Yes, maybe we will have to rethink the concepts of dark matter or dark energy if they fail to find evidence for it at the LHC, but until then its the best we have. Bear in mind that quantum theory is responsible for the best predictions in physics
@TheSunnycar If it sucked in light, you couldn't see what's behind it. And with Dark Matter being in such high concentrations, I think we couldn't be able to see much of the observable universe.
I may be confused here, but estimating that a hyperbolic universe would cause a certain change in the degrees we measured (ie. 1 degree becomes .5 degrees) would require knowing the radius of curvature no?
Is it not possible that the universe is slightly hyperbolic? As long as there is error in human measurements, it will be impossible to prove a triangle has 180 degrees...
I'm an Atheist who proved that god(s) can't exist.
sagargorijala[DOT]blogspot[DOT]com
God(s) can not exist.Space can not be infinite and it is timeless.There is no beginning and an end to the existence of the World.Numbers are infinite but number of apples (existence) can not be infinite.....
I invented this theory in January 2000 and as you can see... more than 11 long years have passed and the World doesn't know my theory. I need your help in doing so. Please help me.
@way12go Sorry man, but the net is full of crooks like you, with childish "theories" "invented". The World will only know your theory as rumblings of yet another crazy guy. I've checked your page and reasoning, your logic is flawed, it's kindergarten level philosophy. Read more, educate yourself, try to find the holes in your own theory before trying to spread it.
The comment about the birth of the universe not needing a deity is of course not a scientific statement but an ideological statement based on a disteleological "leap of faith". Deities by definition should transend scientific observation and cannot be proved or disproved either way. Obeserve data: good science. But make giant philosophical conclusions based on empirical data: not good science.
@BattleBits Gods are postulates as delineated by the faith-traditions that adhere to them. If you can describe X in terms that are applicable to humanity you can show a vanishingly small likelihood of any truth-value with science. As deities are, by definition, described by humanity, and as no faith-traditions contemplate cosmogenesis in this way, and indeed because the model shows no need for any external interference of any kind (yet described or otherwise), it is a consistent statement.
Isn't it possible that the 'dark matter' is just some sort of quantum phenomena that is so dense that on a macrocosmic scale it induces mass and gravity?
Wait a minute. I don't think anyone can say that the Universe is "flat" because the devices used to measure the internal angles of the triangle will be equally distorted by the shape of the Universe. Therefore, the angle measured will always be 180 degrees because of this. One would have to measure the Universe from outside our Universe to know for sure. Comments anyone?
@eseskay99 My first thought is that the distortions of spacetime on the scale of something as small as the size of earth are effected by the curvature of a universe tens of billions of lightyears in diameter much less than the huge three dimensional triangles they are talking about at its edges.
@eseskay99 In the same way, if you draw a triangle on the ground of earth that is one meter wide, and measure the angles, it will seem to add up exactly to 180 degrees, but if you draw a triangle on earth that is so large it spans the entire circumference of the earth, and measure the angles, they will be distorted.
This is really awesome.
I love it how the biggest questions remained unanswered.
nic0dem8D 2 days ago
The universe is flat like my girlfriends tits.
Trojanxplayer 3 weeks ago
And physicist with their linguistic perspicacity. XD
VellianoRosso 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this fuck is bending himself into logical knots so he can claim "there is no external cause of the Universe" - almost as foolish as the multiverse garbage
face it you fucking lame ass twat: you DO NOT KNOW JACK SHIT
RobLed 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
y'all realize this guy is as full of SH IT as any tv preacher?
he has NO IDEA for real about any of this crap and what the scientists "know" to a certainty today will be discarded in the future, and yet blithely continue to pontificate like this pockfaced fuck
RobLed 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i know wat they mean by flat, flat like flat home which is vast but flat in shape.
But how can big bang which supposed to create spherical universe, turns into flat universe. plzz anybody light on this statement. and how much 'flat universe' concept acquire acceptance among scientists community.
ak220880 3 months ago
pure shit
pulsas28 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
plzz can anybody explain in simple language that how can universe be flat in the light of big bang theory.
according to big bang theory universe is expanding since the big blast, that blast most probably extract masses in all direction, so this make it a spherical shape. So, according to big bang theory, universe must be spherical in shape, then how it become flat.
ak220880 3 months ago
So in short our eyes deceive us,our earth is in a bubble of slowed time due to heavey gravity, if u lok from outside in everything will look slowed down, when lloking from inside out u only see the past, so everything we see are images distorted of the past, of how the galaxy was, u'd need to be outside the force field to se the real universe as it is.
Chikarishu 4 months ago
Aether? Flat universe? Just as I was getting used to the world not being flat!
williamgivens 4 months ago
For some reason every time I hear about 'dark matter' / 'dark energy' I think 'ether'. What makes this different from ether except that we can measure its need to exist? Could we simply be misunderstanding the universe in a way that makes it necessary to postulate dark matter and dark energy in place of something else?
songteller 4 months ago
@songteller
i agree. i like the aether idea. it explaines the wave-like nature of the particles. and since the vacuum is not smooth and can be seen as a quantum foam? also, as you say, dark energy is sometimes called quintessence due to its similarity to the classical aether.
the word aether has negative connotations because of its past association to special relativity. nobelphysicist laughlin says that SpRe. presupposed the nonexistence of a space-medium while GeRe. conceptualizes it.
carryall69 4 months ago
@songteller we will never know the whole truth. but so far this theory best describes reality. Now it is up to the observers/experimentors to verify or confirm what the theorists came up with. This is how science works, and it is the only way forward. Yes, maybe we will have to rethink the concepts of dark matter or dark energy if they fail to find evidence for it at the LHC, but until then its the best we have. Bear in mind that quantum theory is responsible for the best predictions in physics
vjanik 1 month ago
Comment removed
skyfaen 4 months ago
you cant see the dark matter because it sucks in light? just a thought :D
TheSunnycar 5 months ago
@TheSunnycar If it sucked in light, you couldn't see what's behind it. And with Dark Matter being in such high concentrations, I think we couldn't be able to see much of the observable universe.
MrReevers 4 months ago
Very interesting. Thank you
Rosanella :)
lillyvalleys 7 months ago
I may be confused here, but estimating that a hyperbolic universe would cause a certain change in the degrees we measured (ie. 1 degree becomes .5 degrees) would require knowing the radius of curvature no?
Is it not possible that the universe is slightly hyperbolic? As long as there is error in human measurements, it will be impossible to prove a triangle has 180 degrees...
longhornssb 9 months ago
Maybe the dark matter is GOD?
TaiFerret 9 months ago
@TaiFerret no..
4FunPlayin 8 months ago
@TaiFerret A god dragged around mercilessly by gravity? That would be a funny one.
nomidubidabi 7 months ago
I'm an Atheist who proved that god(s) can't exist.
sagargorijala[DOT]blogspot[DOT]com
God(s) can not exist.Space can not be infinite and it is timeless.There is no beginning and an end to the existence of the World.Numbers are infinite but number of apples (existence) can not be infinite.....
I invented this theory in January 2000 and as you can see... more than 11 long years have passed and the World doesn't know my theory. I need your help in doing so. Please help me.
way12go 10 months ago
@way12go Sorry man, but the net is full of crooks like you, with childish "theories" "invented". The World will only know your theory as rumblings of yet another crazy guy. I've checked your page and reasoning, your logic is flawed, it's kindergarten level philosophy. Read more, educate yourself, try to find the holes in your own theory before trying to spread it.
nomidubidabi 7 months ago
The comment about the birth of the universe not needing a deity is of course not a scientific statement but an ideological statement based on a disteleological "leap of faith". Deities by definition should transend scientific observation and cannot be proved or disproved either way. Obeserve data: good science. But make giant philosophical conclusions based on empirical data: not good science.
BattleBits 1 year ago
@BattleBits Gods are postulates as delineated by the faith-traditions that adhere to them. If you can describe X in terms that are applicable to humanity you can show a vanishingly small likelihood of any truth-value with science. As deities are, by definition, described by humanity, and as no faith-traditions contemplate cosmogenesis in this way, and indeed because the model shows no need for any external interference of any kind (yet described or otherwise), it is a consistent statement.
COEXISTential 2 months ago
Isn't it possible that the 'dark matter' is just some sort of quantum phenomena that is so dense that on a macrocosmic scale it induces mass and gravity?
w4wxp 1 year ago
i'm an architecture student and i found this lecture is very nice and clear. thank you
maimeu 1 year ago
Wait a minute. I don't think anyone can say that the Universe is "flat" because the devices used to measure the internal angles of the triangle will be equally distorted by the shape of the Universe. Therefore, the angle measured will always be 180 degrees because of this. One would have to measure the Universe from outside our Universe to know for sure. Comments anyone?
eseskay99 1 year ago
@eseskay99 My first thought is that the distortions of spacetime on the scale of something as small as the size of earth are effected by the curvature of a universe tens of billions of lightyears in diameter much less than the huge three dimensional triangles they are talking about at its edges.
Percipient4 1 year ago
@eseskay99 In the same way, if you draw a triangle on the ground of earth that is one meter wide, and measure the angles, it will seem to add up exactly to 180 degrees, but if you draw a triangle on earth that is so large it spans the entire circumference of the earth, and measure the angles, they will be distorted.
Percipient4 1 year ago
very interesting i learnt alot thx
narutoasda 1 year ago
Are you sure the triangle is big enough to determine that the universe is flat? Great lecture. I'll second the "amazing" statement.
eseskay99 1 year ago
@eseskay99 I'm glad you found this interesting as I did. No, I know little more of this then I learned from the talk.
TorBarstad 1 year ago
@eseskay99 "How Do We Know the Universe is Flat?" by tdarnell.
gimmepassword 10 months ago
amazing..
IVISolnxIVI 1 year ago