sick blud innit dats bare live, they are dons bruv dont mess with my dons, or ill beat u up blud ill spark in your face, some piff thing you know its bear hard, check out my channel for more content innit, you will think the channel is a don channel.
it's because Africa has the worst problem. It has the largest homeless population by FAR and being homeless in Africa isn't like being homeless in America.
I just learned about this last year in my world issues cource. My solution is to educate our children so that they grow up with the will be informed and the will to do something.
If you want to end hunger, stop the poor in poor countries from fucking like rabbits when they know they can't damn well support the kids they already have!!!
For those who are critisizing MDGs: I dont know what is the best for this planet, but at the momment MDGs seem promising.Independently from our different political viewpoints, faiths, believes, cultures etc I would argue that we are in this world to experience Love and Freedom. The project MDG's is a way to gain this experience. That is to say, being active is not about them but about myself, my family, neighbourhood,culture,city,country,continent etc We ll find out soon what the best 4 us is.
Euhmm howsabout y'all stop trolling and arguing, and donate some money to a relief organization or go on a mission trip and help these people? Who cares about the politics; people are starving, children are dying, and those of us who are lucky enough to be able to spend our time posting garbage here need to help them. Lets go!
@1pumpkincupcake1 it's because Africa has the worst problem. It has the largest homeless population by FAR and being homeless in Africa isn't like being homeless in America. There are no shelters. No stores to steal from. Hardly animals to eat. No fountains in public places to drink from. Sometimes no clean drinking water. Go travel all of Africa, when you see how literally almost everybody is starving and dehydrated, then maybe you'll understand why Africa. Not being mean just explaining =)
video quality looks good but sorry there's no captions for the billions of Deaf and hard of hearing people. We can see it but we might not comprehend other messages behind the screen. This makes a minus billion possible viewers (deaf and hard of hearing) uneducated. Please remember us and add captions. n
Are corporations evil? Often. Are the World Bank and IMF acting in Corporate Americas interests over developing countries? Probably. Does that make the MDGs useless? No. As a matter of fact, the MDGs are probably the biggest impediment to IMF SAPs (as they encourage federal reinvestment in domestic social services) and thus a thorn in most corporations respective backs. We need the MDGs, as a matter of fact, we need them faster than the UN is willing to achieve them.
Under goals 8 and 3, the international community forgave the Tanzanian national debt, allowing the government to reinvest money in to education and literally increase primary school enrolment by 100% in 2002. Goals 8 and 6 enabled the governments of Rwanda, Uganda, and Tanzania (with UN/donor support) to provide free antiretroviral drugs to people living with HIV in their countries.
@jbuzzw - I think that the MDGs are valuable objectives and that the MD is more altruistic than you make it out to be. The problem is because it takes the UN eons to agree on an adequate implementation strategy, major corporations are taking advantage of the stalemate by continuing to do what they do best, which is exploit developing countries. See the examples below for more information (I couldnt fit it all one post):
i belife in tht its truth huh i saw statistics and till 2015 poverty its going down mutch and tht a fact and im sure the will achive ther goal too now its mutch more less poor people whus living under 2 dolltrs a day and its going up so im happy for it poverty it disapering world wide slowly
how could anyone be against this? This would make me proud to be a yank again and even Obama's first promise was to raise awareness here. I am putting together an "awareness raiser" and would love to use your film to help if that is okay?
agreed jbuzzw. that shit is retarded. where is it ok to steal from one person because you "need" the money more. moreover it feeds them for a day instead of teaching them to fish.
This is exactly what the World Bank and IMF want you to believe. They get countries into horrible debt w/ high interest which they cannot repay and then exploit (steal from) these countries for their natural resources when they default. If you actually READ the propositions of the UN, you will soon learn that their objectives are diametric to your Constitutional rights. The UN, IMF and WB actually make things worse. It leads to CORPORATE EXPLOITATION for profit... just ask Larry Summers.
I just learned about this last year in my world issues cource. My solution is to educate our children so that they grow up with the will be informed and the will to do something. Make teaching this issue and others manditory in school. I belive we can change if this were to happen
I carry the perfect villages for mankind from Jesus.
Just learn and build them over and over to save mankind. A set of basic rules exist that in some villages they do not produce children and serve direct to save the planet. Feeding people only makes more babies to suffer and the Church slows then stops the extra children from existing to suffer so the world can balance. IT IS THE EXACT CORRECT TOOL TO SAVE MANKIND..just click my name and watch my play lists
Typical politically correct UN fucking things up. Why should I listen to this. Why should I believe a group who failed people in Rwanda and Bosnia tha they will get rid of poverty. Face it there will always be rich and poor people in life. Thats the way it is.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Kofi is a crooked fraud, so is his kid. But then the whole UN is like that.
If that woman can't understand why her baby is hungry, she should ask the men in her family, including the baby's father (if she knows who he is) why they haven't fought for the freedom that allows for prosperity. Demanding more handouts from the free world while they keep breeding more poor mouths for us to feed just doesn't cut it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i wreckon-The UN should invade africa and kill all the fucked up goverments and put regional goveners untill all of this happens then we give them back a unified africa
The UN is the eight king of the bible.Rev17 world wide goverments put their hope on a men made laws to accomplish peace on earth,but they forgot that Jehovah is the only one that will bring peace with his Kingdom Dan2:44 woe to them!
Love your neighbor..Would you give someone a snake if they asked you for bread?Why then God will destroy them? Hmm I guess because your thinking is much better than his? or his thinking and his actions have a sense that many of us dont have?...what ever Gods plan are,they are great n if that Un is in his way,he will wipe them off the earth,ohh n he will.Dan 2:44
"My children, I am certain that you all are familiar with the corruption and the evil that has entered upon your government and all of the governments throughout your world. I have watched with dismay and sadness of heart as your governments gather together in a united nation. I feel that they have surrendered themselves now to the enemies of your God, for the major powers are gaining forces, forces of evil to destroy their fellow men." - Jesus, March 18, 1977
The UN is bullshit...they want to prosecute CIA operatives for waterboarding people but wont raise a finger when 1000000 are killed in Rwanda in the spring of 1994.
Well, waterboarding is a human rights offense and I'm sure there are better interrogation methods.. The genocide in Rwanda is not something that the UN can actually control. We all know killing people is bad but the UN has only so many resources. It's not just the UN that feels that genocide is bad, we all do but we don't really have much control of the past particularly since it isn't an ongoing problem.
oh i agree 100%...what better way to spread democracy around the globe than by torturing and imprisoning people without any intention of having a trial?...
You dont give prisoners of war a trial...you hold them as long as the war continues. Torture? We have made the mistake of torturing a few prisoners...but making someone feel like theyre drowning all day to get life saving information (which its proven to do) is well worth it.
The UN is outdated. Why should nations that have less than 25% of the population, have majority voting power? We need a new organization of nations, composed of only great powers. So that the world gets what it really needs.
The same issue was in the United States about two hundred years ago. Do states with big populations get more votes (Virginia would love this)? Or should everybody get one vote (as the small states wanted - Rhode Island). We settled on a bicameral legislature: House (based on pop.) and Senate (2 Senators per state). However, the UN is fine. The big countries may have less population but they are more powerful and more likely to make change happen.
this might sound cold hearted and callous but if 1/3 of africas population cant get good drinking water then dosnt that mean that africa is 1/3 overpopulated also the whole aids epidemic is getting ridiculos i know that if i lived in africa where aids is so prevelent i would exercise extreme caution and reserve when having sex
It isn't as much cold-hearted as it is ignorant (and forgive me if I sound harsh). The problem in Africa isn't just overpopulation. Many countries from 1884-1948 and some after that had basically pillaged Africa(took African gold & resources). The slave trade before then didn't do much good either lol.
And the AIDS epidemic isn't just caused by very horny Africans. Many Africans don't have access to contraceptives that you and I do. Also, sometimes its from rape (civil wars = bad things).
With capitalism we just can't..."If there is a problem and is not possible get profit from it, it will not be resolve."
There is not profit in given education, health care, etc in must African Coutrys, cause people dont have money, and the same for all other places where people dont have money.
The UN, in any situation, regarding humanitarian aid is a joke. Watch the first 10 minutes of the Movie "Blackhawk Down and you will see actions that are typical of "UN aid" in Africa. I witnessed this type of crap from the UN in Africa and Haiti, and the UN sucks at this type of aid.
Great propaganda, Unfortunately for the U.N. actions speak louder than words. Poverty and starvation are made worse around the world by the practices of the U.S. and U.N. backed World Bank and the IMF. And starvation will only get worse with the implimentation of codex alimentarius. Womens rights? How is the U.N. going to fix human rights when many of the member countries who sit on the U.N.'s human rights council go home and practice beheadings and condone honor killings of young women?
It all sounds right and good. But, the Lord Jesus said the poor have been chosen to be rich in faith and He is coming soon to rule and reign. He will destroy those who destroy the world and promote Satan's NWO. They will rule with economics!! If you do not take the mark of the beast in your right hand or forehead you will not be able to buy, sell or trade. If you take it you will be separated from God ,FOREVER!! And you WILL burn in the lake of fire!!! Jesus is the only SALVATION.
SeventhCOG - when? when is he coming/ he has had 2000 years and where is he? are we supposed to let people starve and suffer and let the world go on in perpetual war forever waiting for him to come ? maybe he should have given us clearer instructions! maybe he should have spent a little more time teaching real compassion instead of scaring us with hell and demons. for many this life is hell and those who have and will not help are demons- hands that help are better than hands that pray
God told us this time would come when people like your self would be asking this question and it is a good question. God is not willing that any should be lost. He is waiting for every last soul to get saved. He told us there would be scoffers, mockers, in these last days saying, "Where is the promise of His appearing." We are to live in anticipation of His coming and serve Him by feeding the hungry real bread and God's special bread, HIS WORD!! BUT HE WILL COME!!
I could see where it would be easy to make alot of outrageous claims about how something would happen eventually, and then throw in a word about how after people have waited for a really long time that there would be those who would find it hard to believe that the outrageous claim is true- and if i made these claims in the form of a story where no one could prove if it happened or not, then I could even throw some witnesses into the story to make it appear to have more gravity.
You don't have to let the world starve and go into perpetual war, If you don't want to be responsible just sit on the sidelines, If you want to stop war kill all the war creators, and then you can get on with feeding everyone. The problem is that as long as there are people like the African warlord and the Somali pirates being allowed to run wild, you'll never feed the starving without the evil people stealing the food. Yep tell the warlords to be nice, that will fix it.
If you propose to kill all of the war creators, you would have to kill a lot more than warlords and pirates. Whenever there are places that breed tyrants, and you kill the current tyrant, there is always another one waiting in the wings. The only way to stabilize an area like this is to change the conditions that breed the tyrants- to remove the poverty, hunger and the sense of hopelessness that cause the inhabitants of that region to see the warlords as saviors rather than the problem.
It is easy to criticize someone elses effort to do the right thing, but what is YOUR solution? I cant believe that there is no way to get food to the people who are starving without it all being stolen by warlords. While on the subject, what empowers warlords? What drives people to join them? These are the things that need to be addressed.
Its not always possible to save someone with a cancer, but one thing is sure- you dont cure cancer by killing the patient. War is a time tested failure at problem solving... we cant even keep control of a desert
It must me nice to live in such a simplistic world. The U.S. has in it's history pumped billions of dollars into Africa, other nations have put in money to the region as well, yet poverty persists. In recent years several African nations have had billions of direct payments for their resources, yet they are still in poverty. Poverty is not causing the violence. Greed on the part of the people generating the violence is the cause. Aidid in Somalia did not have poverty in his house.
He confiscated UN food shipments and kept the people from prosperity by stealing everything. Poverty was not a motivator of Aidid, but he was the power behind the violence. As a soldier in the U.S. military, I saw first hand the poverty and the workings of the warlords. You may not think that getting food to people is problematic in these areas, but when the warlord steal the food and the UN issues orders preventing the military from stopping his theft, there you have the problem.
The warlords and their followers are motivated by greed. The warlords find the easiest way to prosperity, which is to steal at gunpoint in a place where they are the only ones with the guns and the will to steal. Their followers go to the power and stay where the wealth is located.
The trick is to kill cancer, and not the patient, as a cancer survivor, I know this only too well, killing the cancer is the only way to cure it.
But, giving the cancer more sustenance is not a way to kill it.
We are not at odds about the necessity of killing the cancer, but war more often than not kills far more innocent bystanders than bad guys. So what is the solution? Is there a way to just kill the cancer?
War is killing and destroying. It happens. No, there is no way around the killing of innocents other than getting themselves out of the way. In WWII the U.S. dropped bombs on Germany, we killed civilians who did not support Hitler, the only other option was to allow Hitlers war machine to grow unchecked. The reason the GWOT is going to go on for decades is that people of today have decided that we cannot have that collateral damage, and that the solution is to leave the bad guys alone.
Just like happened to me, I had Acute Myeloid leukemia (AML). The only cure for this disease is chemotherapy. There is no other treatment. So I went through the treatment, this involved two months laying in a hospital bed, because the chemo killed the cancer, but it also killed my entire immune system, I had No White blood cells because the chemo killed them all off. The same will happen to the people that live around the terrorists. Unless they too join us and fight the bad guys.
The problem is that the terrorists often mingle with the normal population of a country or locate themselves to use the civilians as shields, As with your analogy of white blood cells, the people have no way to get away from the treatment. its easy to chalk this up as collateral damage as long as one justifies it by calling anyone who doesnt fall in line a terrorist. but with a little imagination one can see that collateral damage is only acceptable to those who are dealing the damage
The label of Terrorist has been so misused-anyone who defends their territory or way of life against us as invaders is a terrorist. This would have made the founding fathers terrorists , the Indians terrorists for trying to regain their land etc. often the only difference between terrorism and military action is the size of the force-
one of the downsides of inquisition is that the inquisitors end up becoming more evil than those they seek to purge.
I do not consider terrorists, those who defend their territory, I do consider terrorists, those who fly airplanes into buildings. I also consider terrorists, those who drive cars into crowded markets and blow them up and kill many of their own countrymen. A major difference between our soldiers and the terrorists is that we drop bombs on terrorists and kill a few innocents who happened to be too close, they kill others with impunity even if they kill 20 of their own to get one of ours.
I have no problem with destroying the innocent with the guilty, just as the case with cancer. But that is not my decision. I also have no problem with leaving the terrorists alone, but again that is not my call. But if we leave the terrorists alone, as a matter of national policy, the government has the Constitutional responsibility of protecting the public and would have to go "isolationist" in order to keep the terrorists out.
Now, in the "Global community" the globalists will not tolerate isolationism, so we are back to killing the terrorists, and the associated collateral damage. But who is responsible? Those killing the terrorists for the safety of all, or the terrorists who hide among the innocent?
You could carry that argument of who is responsible backwards in an infinite regression, but the next logical step back would be, who created the terrorists in the first place? Why are they terrorists? Why specifically target the US and its allies? Who armed Saddam? Who trained and supported bin Laden? I would think that one of the first steps in combating terrorism would be to stop creating, arming and funding them.
I also would like to clarify that I am not accusing our service men and women of being terrorists. I am proud of them (and you)for being willing to do what they are asked to in the name of defending our country. What makes me angry is how recklessly they have been deployed and why places like Africa where there is an obvious humanitarian need get ignored while places like Iraq where there was a somewhat stable government are attacked. What did we gain there?
On this we agree, there should be US intervention in Africa, but it must be effective intervention, not a "Peacekeeping Force" that will tie US forces to the region for decades. Clinton told us we would be in Haiti for six months, he said the same about Bosnia. That was in 1994, we are still engaged in both places. If we are to go to Darfur, we need to have a plan to destroy the oppressors not simply to seperate them form their victims.
The problem with the logic of 20/20 hindsight is that it can be embarassing. Who did train and support Bin Laden, the U.S. right. Who supported Saddam? The U.S. again, but when they turned against the U.S. who supported them? Not the U.S. take a good look at the hardware used by the Iraqis, and Aghans today. It is all Russian made. We supported China in 1941, but now they are cold war adversaries and still not our best buds.
Yes 20/20 hindsight is very embarrassing, but those who do not learn from their history are doomed to repeat it... We spent half a century in a shoving match with Russia- 2 bullies in the worlds sandbox-kicking sand in the faces of all other countries and neglecting those who we saw as unimportant. Then when given a chance to befriend Russia we did it halfheartedly. Bush started a preemptive war and pissed on a lot of our allies for not joining in and now we are reaping what we have sown.
If we would have stuck with the founding fathers policy of trade and friendship with everyone and alliances with none, we would have been fine without isolating- or if we would have gone all the way with making alliances and not missed so many opportunities to make friends we would have the worlds assistance to actually make positive change in the world. But instead we seem schizophrenic and narcissistic and even our close allies bad mouth us
Such a policy would have ensured that there was no World War II, but on the down side there would have been no Second World war, because Germany would have won the first. There would have been no Korean war for the US, but then South Korea would have been Communist. There would have been no NATO involvement in the Balkans, but the Serbs would still be massacring Muslims in the region. Our allies do not bad mouth us so much as the "loyal opposition" inside our own country.
So we should have stayed out of Iraq and Afghanistan? I agree again, but only if that non intervention policy applied universally, in which case we would not intervene in Sudan as well, as has been said many times we are not the worlds police force. We should be very careful about our treaty obligations and stay out of areas we are not bound by treaty to enter. But...why is it that when things like Darfur or the Indonesian tsunami, the US is the one who gets the 911 calls?
Right, ljust let our Warriors do their job and take as many muslims as they can. No more tree hugging sympathizers.. Let our Warriors make their families proud.
you have stumbled into a conversation that was too mature for you 6 days ago when it was still being discussed.- you have obviously been drinking the corporate cool aid, so just go and help build the empire and dont ask what good it is doing, or who is really benefitting...
Or it would most likely inflame a jihad that would make all muslims in the world - even the ones that where previously friendly - want to burn the USA to the ground. Nuking Meka would cause way more problems then we have right now.
Nope, why would Allha allow for such a tragity to befall there holyest of citys? and at the very least, it would become a very good threat to use against them. And if they declare Jihad, sowhat, NATO can easily thwart an uprising.
Hahha. It recall playing a flash game about 7-8 years ago that involved bombing cities in the middle east. One was Mecca.
I think that as funny as it would be, it is just plain stupid. Kill innocent Muslims (not all will be middle-eastern. They'll be French, Americans, and more) and for what? What are you trying to prove? America nukes civilians? NATO is not going to support such an unprovoked attack on a holy city... Plus, ONE in SIX people in the WORLD are Muslims. Good luck stopping them!
No one will ever attack Mecca, but lets say israel were too be attacked, and it got to a point when they were about to lose. Guess what there gonna blow up?
So what is your point? If Israel will blow up Mecca, then why do you advocate it?
Back to the point.... nuking Mecca will bring no body any good. If someone blew up Jerusalem, do you think all the Jews and Christians in the world would suddenly became faithless? Hell no! They'd get pissed and kill who ever did it... of course in the name of their God... LOL.
You act as if Muslims and Christian/Jews are the same. In islam Mecca isn't just holy, its part of the 5 pillars. And without one of the Pillars, there religion will simply fall apart.
Making a pilgrimage to Mecca is a pillar indeed but just cause you nuke their holiest city doesn't mean that they won't become mighty pissed at the bastard who did it. Forget the hajj (the fifth pillar), let's replace it with jihad (the so-called "sixth pillar")!
Your ideas of blowing things up to solve problems are stuck in the 20th century.
Think it like this. Now lets say a Islamic terrorist organization blew up NYC. And we destroy Mecca in retaliation. Acording to Islam Allah is the god of gods. So why would god let the most important city in there religion be destroyed? They have to pray 5 times a day towards Mecca, How can you declare Jihhad when you religion is falling apart.
Haha ok. Their god is fake. Why don't you just say it, all gods and their respective religions are fake? We all know it. But your logic is faulty. You're assuming that once we bomb them, defy their God, and murder a bunch of innocent pilgrims (not Islamic terrorists) that they will simply say, "Oh dear. Allah is not real for he would not have let Mecca be destroyed" and go away. NO! Just like how the US reacted to 9/11, the Muslim people will be just as angry and retaliate with full force...
9/11 was nothing, it did nothing the Christian faith, infact it acually made it stronger.
And Islam falling apart would not be over night. Yes some people will declare jihhad, and yes some people will stay muslim, besides the fact that theres not city. But if there influence on the world is broken, then it will become a better place.
Simple, Islam has 5 pillars. You need to do every one of them. If Mecca were to be destroyed. They could not pray, go on the pilgrimage and preform there dutys as a Muslim. Now i've talked to a Muslim once. I brough up the subject "what would you do if Mecca got hit by a meteor?" He said. "No that just woundn't happen, Allah would stop it." Now just try to imagine your whole belief system were to be proven false. What do you do?
Lol ok... So in wrecking Mecca you wreck the belief systems of a bunch of Muslims. What do you accomplish? What's so "bad" about them in the first place? And are they really any worse than any other religious group in the world?
this is an amazing project whose goal is to make the world a better place. every year millions of people die because they dont have the 12 cent vaccine against malaria, those people arent just statistics they are real people moms and dads baby sisters and brothers, any one of those lives that are saved because of these millenium goals are absolutely worth it. the millenium project is saving peoples lives, how can that be a bad thing?
you don't seem to know how things work. the united states is not an isolated system. what goes outside your tiny little world affects you and your country. here's a tip on how not to be such an idiot - learn about all points of view and the evidence backing each and then think about what you have learned before you believe what some other joe tells you! if you don't YOU ARE THE ZOMBIE, fool.
REPEAT- What right does someone have to take our money and give it to someone else? Especially by someone who isnt American to someone who isnt American??
DontBeObamaZombies - right now the american government is taking away our money and giving it to rich people who couldnt manage the money they had so they can go on living well while we loose everything in a slow death of a million cuts, personally i would rather see that money go to feed and educate my brothers and sisters in the world than go to the dogs and if that is socialism so be it.
right, but from what I read just now (Memorandum 200) and what i read previously on the unesco website, the idea is supposed to be more of a positive lessening of the population than a negative one- in other words, education and birth control as opposed to starvation and forced sterilization. this is something that i am trying to find answers to myself, but in the meantime is it ok to let these people starve? do you have an answer?
The Same Military Industrial Complex that controls the UN and whos policy is to depopulate the third world will be the same Organization that will be "preventing them from starving"
Its just like Bill Gates, who donates Billions to "save the children" when what it really does is sterilizes them
dont forget that it is also the same Military Industrial Complex that controls the U.S.,
but i am open minded[ can you send me any reliable information (no conspiracy theory garbage) that shows things like the allegations against bill gates mentioned here to be true? its not a challenge, I am curious to see what information you have... I am also curious if you think the world will survive without SOME measure of population control? and if not, then what would You propose as a way to handle it?
Even if they are from the new world order, or some other conspiracy.. Why not just help out people. I think the Millennium Development Goals are a great opportunity to learn, and help other people, and ourselves.
Those who've participated and furthered the U.N.'s eugenics program should be put on trial for crimes against humanity. Aborticide is a tenet of eugenics as practiced by Hitler's henchmen. The world can easily sustain thrice the current population. The Sub-Saharan countries are the World Health Organization's laboratory for all things fiendish. The proof of U.N. perfidy is everywhere from within & without.
"The world can easily sustain thrice the current population". Buddy, you should take the time to at least EDUCATE yourself, whether you agree or disagree with the intentions of the United Nations. The world can easily sustain three times the current population if we let the majority of people live below North American standards of living and in poverty. If everyone lived like North American's we would need over three planets in order to "sustain ourselves".
Poverty per capita is at an all-time low. There's more of everything from toilets to roads to buttons & bows. Read something, anything, other than what Oprah suggests. Free yourself. Population reduction starts with you.
this is propaganda! The United Nations and CFR, and all governments of the world is part of the New World Order! Wake up people this video is full of lies!
I'm glad to see the comments on this are from realist instead of bunch of liberal activist.I guess that wasn't in the budget for the propaganda machine. IT's been 8 years and how much did we(taxpayers)give to who?????
Change won't be coming with Barrack Obama I guaranty it!!! Try Ron Paul in 2012
this is a con job see section 5 of the Global poverty act states that it goals are in line with the United Nations Millennium Declaration. Do a search for Millennium Declaration and read section 9 of that doc. They want our guns
it's stupid there are many probs on earth and one think in witch billions of $ are given are millitary uses...i mean there should be peace on earth but nations prefer to spend money on weapons than to help others like africa...or others 4 ppl die each minute in the whole world cuz they don't have water ! omg
Bill Gates has given untold millions to fund the World Health Organization. They've been caught secretly administering abortifacients (drugs or other agents that induce abortions) in serums to third-world women.
and just how bad is it that they are giving the choice to abort to a woman in a 3rd world country? I think that if you are not able to support yourself adequately you shouldnt bring other kids along because youre making things worse.
So, in my opinion, yeah, if they want to abort, green light to em! I dont think kids should be brought into this world to suffer.
@laurandreina1 Perhaps so, but with suffering comes joy. It would be fair for them to see this world, trees, sunlight, concrete people. Let them experience laughter, sadness, joy, anger, let them experience things that we have experienced. Personally, I believe that the minute they are created they should experience.
its a beast with alot of different heads. these heads are different, they have different brains. they do not think alike exactly, but they have to look after the same body, no matter how different they think and appear. the beast's heads will try to unite as one. by imposing thier beliefs on eachother, one head believes in one god, most others another. the wisest one severs himself, but the more clever one believes he is god.
I bet a huge food shortage would clean up a lot of unsutainable resources, then Africa could become something that supports life, instead of leading to more suffering.
I think one point that is going unnoticed here is the issue of overpopulation. The famine and the disease, are all primary indications of an areas inability to support a population. I know, "thinning the herd", is a really shitty way to describe theses situations, but if everyone was healthy and prosperous, then ultimately, know one would be. The earth provides enough resources for a certain populace. If we interfere to much we will strain Earths resources, and we will all suffer.
Wipe out the unnesicary population of Africa. Suddenly you get; infant mortality down, starvation down, poverty, suffering down; use aids, use nukes, reduce the population of a few billion of people who don't have what it takes to be human, and create a utopia for those that remain. What good ever came out of Africa in the last 200 years?
well not the UN is bad the ones who are in charge...but not all presidents...and World Control won't ever happen if everything won't be awesome cuz there will always be a Rebelion...like in any conquest and those things...just like you that don't agree with them :)
The u.n. is the biggest crock of crap on earth. They make up rules that they would never enforce. They do accept large sums of money. If you live in the U.S. it is probably your money.
"In order to stabilize world population, it is necessary to eliminate 350,000 people a day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say it." — Oceanographer Jacques Cousteau, as quoted in "The Courier," a publication of the U.N. Educational, Scientific & Cultural Organization (U.N.E.S.C.O.)
"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal." — Ted Turner of C.N.N., as quoted in the "McAlvany Intelligence Advisor," 6/96
No one! They don't really want this! They want you to believe it so everyone will hand over control to their Luciferian organization called The UN so they can have global control! Don't believe me watch watch?v=4yKSDKdDuuQ
This is crap! United Nations doesn't want to protect anyone! They want all of us to give control to them to create an one world government! The United Nations are evil! Don't believe me watch watch?v=4yKSDKdDuuQ
That's exactly what they want! The United Nations wants complete control! The United Nations is evil! Don't believe me check out this video watch?v=4yKSDKdDuuQ
even if its communist propaganda. you miss the point. we each have a responsibility as citizens of the world to do something. we all want safety and security for our family and ourselves. start seeing beyond the imaginary lines we call national borders. AND realize that there is no "us" and there is no "them".
Oh....and it's the 21st century....an age of Blackberry's, MacBook Air, and commercial space travel....why can't we fill empty bowls with food? Because we are all inherently selfish...it is our demise.
Now, with approx. 7 billion in the world, are these 'goals' feasible? They seem to conflict with one another. At our current state, hunger for some, sate for others; we are having issues with sustainability. So the real question is not whether "we" can eradicate hunger and poverty, but can the earth?
Bravo for the UN, what a declaration! They can begin their quest to eradicate "extreme poverty" by using the $1.9 billion the UN has been alloted to renovate their dilapidated headquarters. Why not throw that into the world "tip jar"?
They could get a brand new building for a hell of lot less than almost $2 billion...right?
It isn't so much a declaration as an undertaking by 190 nations similar to the 1970 declaration that the OECD nations would donate 0.7% of GDP to foreign aid. To date only 5 small European countries have lived up to their promises.
I am not a proponent of the UN. It is an organization consisting of individuals who are corrupted by greed and self-interest; who are given power to further that very greed and self-interest. The UN's foremost objective, world peace keeping, has been overshadowed by the undercurrents of a "One World Government". They are 21st century pirates--rape, pillage and plunder, and the world community allows it. The 'have' and the 'have not' remain at opposite sides of the spectrum. Is there any hope...
Check out my channel for more videos like this. We as BRAH community highly support this cause.
Everyone needs to know.
MurdahBRAH 3 months ago
sick blud innit dats bare live, they are dons bruv dont mess with my dons, or ill beat u up blud ill spark in your face, some piff thing you know its bear hard, check out my channel for more content innit, you will think the channel is a don channel.
N4N0Gremlin 3 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
U N is a radical group like Hamas that can't be trusted.
liang8231 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I agree with We will not stop until poverty is history. Lets do everything it takes to make the MDG happen
many9662 3 months ago
Universal Primary Education?Canada and Cuba (yeah, the comunist's) have made this achivement decades ago 99,7% of primary education.
Ensure enviromental sustainability? STOP WAR and neoliberalistic imperialism.
minami935 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
it's because Africa has the worst problem. It has the largest homeless population by FAR and being homeless in Africa isn't like being homeless in America.
claircote4416 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I just learned about this last year in my world issues cource. My solution is to educate our children so that they grow up with the will be informed and the will to do something.
minami935 3 months ago
Where was the MDG declaration signed? I think it was in the year 2000 but where? New York?
keffoo321 3 months ago
Check out my video:
The United Nations -- RUN FROM THEM! RUN FAST!
letstalkaboutstuff 6 months ago
Rule 1 of the U.N. - If this is an emergency, please hang up and call America.
davitodude 8 months ago
If you want to end hunger, stop the poor in poor countries from fucking like rabbits when they know they can't damn well support the kids they already have!!!
sapher2020 10 months ago
For those who are critisizing MDGs: I dont know what is the best for this planet, but at the momment MDGs seem promising.Independently from our different political viewpoints, faiths, believes, cultures etc I would argue that we are in this world to experience Love and Freedom. The project MDG's is a way to gain this experience. That is to say, being active is not about them but about myself, my family, neighbourhood,culture,city,country,continent etc We ll find out soon what the best 4 us is.
GloballyArtistic 11 months ago 3
Euhmm howsabout y'all stop trolling and arguing, and donate some money to a relief organization or go on a mission trip and help these people? Who cares about the politics; people are starving, children are dying, and those of us who are lucky enough to be able to spend our time posting garbage here need to help them. Lets go!
TheWorldEditor 1 year ago 3
Erradicate extreme poverty an hunger? Sinply nullify external debt to poor countries, so they can ejoy the proffits of their own work.
Universal Primary Education?Canada and Cuba (yeah, the comunist's) have made this achivement decades ago 99,7% of primary education.
Ensure enviromental sustainability? STOP WAR and neoliberalistic imperialism.
Global Partnership? Just respect internal politics
And what about american (whole America) originary cultures? They only ask for a little respect
dpusineri 1 year ago
Why is this just on Africa? I'm sure there are problems similar in other countries.
1pumpkincupcake1 1 year ago
@1pumpkincupcake1 it's because Africa has the worst problem. It has the largest homeless population by FAR and being homeless in Africa isn't like being homeless in America. There are no shelters. No stores to steal from. Hardly animals to eat. No fountains in public places to drink from. Sometimes no clean drinking water. Go travel all of Africa, when you see how literally almost everybody is starving and dehydrated, then maybe you'll understand why Africa. Not being mean just explaining =)
queenwonderland 1 year ago
We will not stop until poverty is history. Lets do everything it takes to make the MDG happen
worldwiderights 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
anyone finding this ILT really boring ?
Andrew112357 1 year ago
is anyone finding this ilt really boring?
Andrew112357 1 year ago
U N is a radical group like Hamas that can't be trusted.
JBBlitz 1 year ago
@JBBlitz ...makes sense.
AmFaJibTheDude 1 year ago
The U.N. is a HUGE joke, 'cause they don't give a FUCk about us.
unituldacycle 1 year ago
That girl at 2:40 looks like she could burn a hole in the lining of your eyes with that stare.
tattat44 1 year ago
video quality looks good but sorry there's no captions for the billions of Deaf and hard of hearing people. We can see it but we might not comprehend other messages behind the screen. This makes a minus billion possible viewers (deaf and hard of hearing) uneducated. Please remember us and add captions. n
PegPros 1 year ago
@PegPros billions.... you mean thousands millions at most
K3v1nPr0 1 year ago
Are corporations evil? Often. Are the World Bank and IMF acting in Corporate Americas interests over developing countries? Probably. Does that make the MDGs useless? No. As a matter of fact, the MDGs are probably the biggest impediment to IMF SAPs (as they encourage federal reinvestment in domestic social services) and thus a thorn in most corporations respective backs. We need the MDGs, as a matter of fact, we need them faster than the UN is willing to achieve them.
scarscanbebeautiful 1 year ago
Under goals 8 and 3, the international community forgave the Tanzanian national debt, allowing the government to reinvest money in to education and literally increase primary school enrolment by 100% in 2002. Goals 8 and 6 enabled the governments of Rwanda, Uganda, and Tanzania (with UN/donor support) to provide free antiretroviral drugs to people living with HIV in their countries.
scarscanbebeautiful 1 year ago
@jbuzzw - I think that the MDGs are valuable objectives and that the MD is more altruistic than you make it out to be. The problem is because it takes the UN eons to agree on an adequate implementation strategy, major corporations are taking advantage of the stalemate by continuing to do what they do best, which is exploit developing countries. See the examples below for more information (I couldnt fit it all one post):
scarscanbebeautiful 1 year ago
i belife in tht its truth huh i saw statistics and till 2015 poverty its going down mutch and tht a fact and im sure the will achive ther goal too now its mutch more less poor people whus living under 2 dolltrs a day and its going up so im happy for it poverty it disapering world wide slowly
martini9799 1 year ago
how could anyone be against this? This would make me proud to be a yank again and even Obama's first promise was to raise awareness here. I am putting together an "awareness raiser" and would love to use your film to help if that is okay?
psoychak 1 year ago
What about $1.1?
adrastea99 2 years ago
what is the lyk tune at the beginning of the song? with a woman lyk singing in?
XxShazzyxX1 2 years ago
what a extreme poverty in 2015?
thatwarior 2 years ago
agreed jbuzzw. that shit is retarded. where is it ok to steal from one person because you "need" the money more. moreover it feeds them for a day instead of teaching them to fish.
supergenius18 2 years ago
This is exactly what the World Bank and IMF want you to believe. They get countries into horrible debt w/ high interest which they cannot repay and then exploit (steal from) these countries for their natural resources when they default. If you actually READ the propositions of the UN, you will soon learn that their objectives are diametric to your Constitutional rights. The UN, IMF and WB actually make things worse. It leads to CORPORATE EXPLOITATION for profit... just ask Larry Summers.
jbuzzw 2 years ago 11
So True.
crazy2333 1 year ago
@jbuzzw
I just learned about this last year in my world issues cource. My solution is to educate our children so that they grow up with the will be informed and the will to do something. Make teaching this issue and others manditory in school. I belive we can change if this were to happen
zlkimagenX 1 year ago
I carry the perfect villages for mankind from Jesus.
Just learn and build them over and over to save mankind. A set of basic rules exist that in some villages they do not produce children and serve direct to save the planet. Feeding people only makes more babies to suffer and the Church slows then stops the extra children from existing to suffer so the world can balance. IT IS THE EXACT CORRECT TOOL TO SAVE MANKIND..just click my name and watch my play lists
Peterwhitlock 9 months ago
more poor people than ever, aren't there?
tazztone 2 years ago
Typical politically correct UN fucking things up. Why should I listen to this. Why should I believe a group who failed people in Rwanda and Bosnia tha they will get rid of poverty. Face it there will always be rich and poor people in life. Thats the way it is.
cloughers 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Kofi is a crooked fraud, so is his kid. But then the whole UN is like that.
If that woman can't understand why her baby is hungry, she should ask the men in her family, including the baby's father (if she knows who he is) why they haven't fought for the freedom that allows for prosperity. Demanding more handouts from the free world while they keep breeding more poor mouths for us to feed just doesn't cut it.
wrjamescom 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i wreckon-The UN should invade africa and kill all the fucked up goverments and put regional goveners untill all of this happens then we give them back a unified africa
LiwamGeebon 2 years ago
you can kill the people but never destroy an ideology
xXcynicalMINDXx 2 years ago 13
This has been flagged as spam show
The UN is the eight king of the bible.Rev17 world wide goverments put their hope on a men made laws to accomplish peace on earth,but they forgot that Jehovah is the only one that will bring peace with his Kingdom Dan2:44 woe to them!
stupidvid 2 years ago
so we just give up on peace?
TheDcrat 2 years ago
Love your neighbor..Would you give someone a snake if they asked you for bread?Why then God will destroy them? Hmm I guess because your thinking is much better than his? or his thinking and his actions have a sense that many of us dont have?...what ever Gods plan are,they are great n if that Un is in his way,he will wipe them off the earth,ohh n he will.Dan 2:44
stupidvid 2 years ago
Comment removed
aruytpadyugf 2 years ago
why doesn't Kofi offer to donate part of his stupendous wage he doesn't earn to feed his starving black brothers, he just likes to talk it up!
sumwun26 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
His white wife is oppressing him. She wont let him give away her money he stole. :)
wrjamescom 2 years ago
This was supposed to happen in 2000.
So are we there yet?
.....Didn't think so!
VonHelton 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice work. keep it up. mean time come for social media marketing for esteembpo**com ggg
rosycarolina 2 years ago
Comment removed
kerouac1000 2 years ago
God is not dead
The UN was never alive
IchBinDieKaiser 2 years ago
DISMAY AND SADNESS
"My children, I am certain that you all are familiar with the corruption and the evil that has entered upon your government and all of the governments throughout your world. I have watched with dismay and sadness of heart as your governments gather together in a united nation. I feel that they have surrendered themselves now to the enemies of your God, for the major powers are gaining forces, forces of evil to destroy their fellow men." - Jesus, March 18, 1977
hatethesinnotsinner 2 years ago
I thought the UN is from "CUNT" because that is what the UN is, a cunt. So, it is the big cunt.
symetra62 2 years ago
Hm, maby you hsould say "Female genetalia" istead of "cunt"? Just say the UN is an asshole instead, it wont offend anyone. Geez.
Fallerenfalleralla 2 years ago
Why are you a cunt too?
symetra62 2 years ago
That offends me due to the fact that I have an asshole.
blahk04 2 years ago 2
yes it is
dr4z3n 2 years ago
These are verifiable UN FACTS. Stranger than fiction......
1. The UN publishing house is the "Lucis Trust" formerly "Lucifer Trust"
2. The only "meditation room" in the UN is operated by the Lucis Trust.
3. At one time, the Lucis Trust office in New York was located at 666 United Nations Plaza and is a member of the Economic and Social Council.
4. LT is ALL about new age religion, population control, and earth worship.
Check it out, it is not a secret. What is the UN's agenda?
Badactor67 2 years ago
The UN is bullshit...they want to prosecute CIA operatives for waterboarding people but wont raise a finger when 1000000 are killed in Rwanda in the spring of 1994.
Icarusdecending82 2 years ago
Well, waterboarding is a human rights offense and I'm sure there are better interrogation methods.. The genocide in Rwanda is not something that the UN can actually control. We all know killing people is bad but the UN has only so many resources. It's not just the UN that feels that genocide is bad, we all do but we don't really have much control of the past particularly since it isn't an ongoing problem.
Chinua3 2 years ago
oh i agree 100%...what better way to spread democracy around the globe than by torturing and imprisoning people without any intention of having a trial?...
xRIKTERx 2 years ago
You dont give prisoners of war a trial...you hold them as long as the war continues. Torture? We have made the mistake of torturing a few prisoners...but making someone feel like theyre drowning all day to get life saving information (which its proven to do) is well worth it.
Icarusdecending82 2 years ago
What's sad is the US NAVY waterboards navy seals for there torture training so I think they(liberals) blew this way out of perportion...
ghdgdgr 2 years ago
The UN is outdated. Why should nations that have less than 25% of the population, have majority voting power? We need a new organization of nations, composed of only great powers. So that the world gets what it really needs.
jetsam50000 2 years ago
The same issue was in the United States about two hundred years ago. Do states with big populations get more votes (Virginia would love this)? Or should everybody get one vote (as the small states wanted - Rhode Island). We settled on a bicameral legislature: House (based on pop.) and Senate (2 Senators per state). However, the UN is fine. The big countries may have less population but they are more powerful and more likely to make change happen.
Chinua3 2 years ago
this might sound cold hearted and callous but if 1/3 of africas population cant get good drinking water then dosnt that mean that africa is 1/3 overpopulated also the whole aids epidemic is getting ridiculos i know that if i lived in africa where aids is so prevelent i would exercise extreme caution and reserve when having sex
evilchunk1 2 years ago
It isn't as much cold-hearted as it is ignorant (and forgive me if I sound harsh). The problem in Africa isn't just overpopulation. Many countries from 1884-1948 and some after that had basically pillaged Africa(took African gold & resources). The slave trade before then didn't do much good either lol.
And the AIDS epidemic isn't just caused by very horny Africans. Many Africans don't have access to contraceptives that you and I do. Also, sometimes its from rape (civil wars = bad things).
Chinua3 2 years ago
With capitalism we just can't..."If there is a problem and is not possible get profit from it, it will not be resolve."
There is not profit in given education, health care, etc in must African Coutrys, cause people dont have money, and the same for all other places where people dont have money.
AzoreanProud 2 years ago
brutal
mariagruart 2 years ago
The UN, in any situation, regarding humanitarian aid is a joke. Watch the first 10 minutes of the Movie "Blackhawk Down and you will see actions that are typical of "UN aid" in Africa. I witnessed this type of crap from the UN in Africa and Haiti, and the UN sucks at this type of aid.
Geographer76 2 years ago
Great propaganda, Unfortunately for the U.N. actions speak louder than words. Poverty and starvation are made worse around the world by the practices of the U.S. and U.N. backed World Bank and the IMF. And starvation will only get worse with the implimentation of codex alimentarius. Womens rights? How is the U.N. going to fix human rights when many of the member countries who sit on the U.N.'s human rights council go home and practice beheadings and condone honor killings of young women?
1id8pe 2 years ago
Comment removed
1id8pe 2 years ago
It all sounds right and good. But, the Lord Jesus said the poor have been chosen to be rich in faith and He is coming soon to rule and reign. He will destroy those who destroy the world and promote Satan's NWO. They will rule with economics!! If you do not take the mark of the beast in your right hand or forehead you will not be able to buy, sell or trade. If you take it you will be separated from God ,FOREVER!! And you WILL burn in the lake of fire!!! Jesus is the only SALVATION.
SeventhCOG 3 years ago
SeventhCOG - when? when is he coming/ he has had 2000 years and where is he? are we supposed to let people starve and suffer and let the world go on in perpetual war forever waiting for him to come ? maybe he should have given us clearer instructions! maybe he should have spent a little more time teaching real compassion instead of scaring us with hell and demons. for many this life is hell and those who have and will not help are demons- hands that help are better than hands that pray
Aufhetzer 2 years ago
God told us this time would come when people like your self would be asking this question and it is a good question. God is not willing that any should be lost. He is waiting for every last soul to get saved. He told us there would be scoffers, mockers, in these last days saying, "Where is the promise of His appearing." We are to live in anticipation of His coming and serve Him by feeding the hungry real bread and God's special bread, HIS WORD!! BUT HE WILL COME!!
SeventhCOG 2 years ago
I could see where it would be easy to make alot of outrageous claims about how something would happen eventually, and then throw in a word about how after people have waited for a really long time that there would be those who would find it hard to believe that the outrageous claim is true- and if i made these claims in the form of a story where no one could prove if it happened or not, then I could even throw some witnesses into the story to make it appear to have more gravity.
Aufhetzer 2 years ago
You don't have to let the world starve and go into perpetual war, If you don't want to be responsible just sit on the sidelines, If you want to stop war kill all the war creators, and then you can get on with feeding everyone. The problem is that as long as there are people like the African warlord and the Somali pirates being allowed to run wild, you'll never feed the starving without the evil people stealing the food. Yep tell the warlords to be nice, that will fix it.
Geographer76 2 years ago
If you propose to kill all of the war creators, you would have to kill a lot more than warlords and pirates. Whenever there are places that breed tyrants, and you kill the current tyrant, there is always another one waiting in the wings. The only way to stabilize an area like this is to change the conditions that breed the tyrants- to remove the poverty, hunger and the sense of hopelessness that cause the inhabitants of that region to see the warlords as saviors rather than the problem.
Aufhetzer 2 years ago
It is easy to criticize someone elses effort to do the right thing, but what is YOUR solution? I cant believe that there is no way to get food to the people who are starving without it all being stolen by warlords. While on the subject, what empowers warlords? What drives people to join them? These are the things that need to be addressed.
Aufhetzer 2 years ago
Its not always possible to save someone with a cancer, but one thing is sure- you dont cure cancer by killing the patient. War is a time tested failure at problem solving... we cant even keep control of a desert
Aufhetzer 2 years ago
It must me nice to live in such a simplistic world. The U.S. has in it's history pumped billions of dollars into Africa, other nations have put in money to the region as well, yet poverty persists. In recent years several African nations have had billions of direct payments for their resources, yet they are still in poverty. Poverty is not causing the violence. Greed on the part of the people generating the violence is the cause. Aidid in Somalia did not have poverty in his house.
Geographer76 2 years ago
He confiscated UN food shipments and kept the people from prosperity by stealing everything. Poverty was not a motivator of Aidid, but he was the power behind the violence. As a soldier in the U.S. military, I saw first hand the poverty and the workings of the warlords. You may not think that getting food to people is problematic in these areas, but when the warlord steal the food and the UN issues orders preventing the military from stopping his theft, there you have the problem.
Geographer76 2 years ago
The warlords and their followers are motivated by greed. The warlords find the easiest way to prosperity, which is to steal at gunpoint in a place where they are the only ones with the guns and the will to steal. Their followers go to the power and stay where the wealth is located.
The trick is to kill cancer, and not the patient, as a cancer survivor, I know this only too well, killing the cancer is the only way to cure it.
But, giving the cancer more sustenance is not a way to kill it.
Geographer76 2 years ago
We are not at odds about the necessity of killing the cancer, but war more often than not kills far more innocent bystanders than bad guys. So what is the solution? Is there a way to just kill the cancer?
Aufhetzer 2 years ago
War is killing and destroying. It happens. No, there is no way around the killing of innocents other than getting themselves out of the way. In WWII the U.S. dropped bombs on Germany, we killed civilians who did not support Hitler, the only other option was to allow Hitlers war machine to grow unchecked. The reason the GWOT is going to go on for decades is that people of today have decided that we cannot have that collateral damage, and that the solution is to leave the bad guys alone.
Geographer76 2 years ago
Just like happened to me, I had Acute Myeloid leukemia (AML). The only cure for this disease is chemotherapy. There is no other treatment. So I went through the treatment, this involved two months laying in a hospital bed, because the chemo killed the cancer, but it also killed my entire immune system, I had No White blood cells because the chemo killed them all off. The same will happen to the people that live around the terrorists. Unless they too join us and fight the bad guys.
Geographer76 2 years ago
The problem is that the terrorists often mingle with the normal population of a country or locate themselves to use the civilians as shields, As with your analogy of white blood cells, the people have no way to get away from the treatment. its easy to chalk this up as collateral damage as long as one justifies it by calling anyone who doesnt fall in line a terrorist. but with a little imagination one can see that collateral damage is only acceptable to those who are dealing the damage
Aufhetzer 2 years ago
The label of Terrorist has been so misused-anyone who defends their territory or way of life against us as invaders is a terrorist. This would have made the founding fathers terrorists , the Indians terrorists for trying to regain their land etc. often the only difference between terrorism and military action is the size of the force-
one of the downsides of inquisition is that the inquisitors end up becoming more evil than those they seek to purge.
Aufhetzer 2 years ago
I do not consider terrorists, those who defend their territory, I do consider terrorists, those who fly airplanes into buildings. I also consider terrorists, those who drive cars into crowded markets and blow them up and kill many of their own countrymen. A major difference between our soldiers and the terrorists is that we drop bombs on terrorists and kill a few innocents who happened to be too close, they kill others with impunity even if they kill 20 of their own to get one of ours.
Geographer76 2 years ago
I have no problem with destroying the innocent with the guilty, just as the case with cancer. But that is not my decision. I also have no problem with leaving the terrorists alone, but again that is not my call. But if we leave the terrorists alone, as a matter of national policy, the government has the Constitutional responsibility of protecting the public and would have to go "isolationist" in order to keep the terrorists out.
Geographer76 2 years ago
Now, in the "Global community" the globalists will not tolerate isolationism, so we are back to killing the terrorists, and the associated collateral damage. But who is responsible? Those killing the terrorists for the safety of all, or the terrorists who hide among the innocent?
Geographer76 2 years ago
You could carry that argument of who is responsible backwards in an infinite regression, but the next logical step back would be, who created the terrorists in the first place? Why are they terrorists? Why specifically target the US and its allies? Who armed Saddam? Who trained and supported bin Laden? I would think that one of the first steps in combating terrorism would be to stop creating, arming and funding them.
Aufhetzer 2 years ago
I also would like to clarify that I am not accusing our service men and women of being terrorists. I am proud of them (and you)for being willing to do what they are asked to in the name of defending our country. What makes me angry is how recklessly they have been deployed and why places like Africa where there is an obvious humanitarian need get ignored while places like Iraq where there was a somewhat stable government are attacked. What did we gain there?
Aufhetzer 2 years ago
On this we agree, there should be US intervention in Africa, but it must be effective intervention, not a "Peacekeeping Force" that will tie US forces to the region for decades. Clinton told us we would be in Haiti for six months, he said the same about Bosnia. That was in 1994, we are still engaged in both places. If we are to go to Darfur, we need to have a plan to destroy the oppressors not simply to seperate them form their victims.
Geographer76 2 years ago
The problem with the logic of 20/20 hindsight is that it can be embarassing. Who did train and support Bin Laden, the U.S. right. Who supported Saddam? The U.S. again, but when they turned against the U.S. who supported them? Not the U.S. take a good look at the hardware used by the Iraqis, and Aghans today. It is all Russian made. We supported China in 1941, but now they are cold war adversaries and still not our best buds.
Geographer76 2 years ago
Yes 20/20 hindsight is very embarrassing, but those who do not learn from their history are doomed to repeat it... We spent half a century in a shoving match with Russia- 2 bullies in the worlds sandbox-kicking sand in the faces of all other countries and neglecting those who we saw as unimportant. Then when given a chance to befriend Russia we did it halfheartedly. Bush started a preemptive war and pissed on a lot of our allies for not joining in and now we are reaping what we have sown.
Aufhetzer 2 years ago
If we would have stuck with the founding fathers policy of trade and friendship with everyone and alliances with none, we would have been fine without isolating- or if we would have gone all the way with making alliances and not missed so many opportunities to make friends we would have the worlds assistance to actually make positive change in the world. But instead we seem schizophrenic and narcissistic and even our close allies bad mouth us
Aufhetzer 2 years ago
Such a policy would have ensured that there was no World War II, but on the down side there would have been no Second World war, because Germany would have won the first. There would have been no Korean war for the US, but then South Korea would have been Communist. There would have been no NATO involvement in the Balkans, but the Serbs would still be massacring Muslims in the region. Our allies do not bad mouth us so much as the "loyal opposition" inside our own country.
Geographer76 2 years ago
So we should have stayed out of Iraq and Afghanistan? I agree again, but only if that non intervention policy applied universally, in which case we would not intervene in Sudan as well, as has been said many times we are not the worlds police force. We should be very careful about our treaty obligations and stay out of areas we are not bound by treaty to enter. But...why is it that when things like Darfur or the Indonesian tsunami, the US is the one who gets the 911 calls?
Geographer76 2 years ago
Right, ljust let our Warriors do their job and take as many muslims as they can. No more tree hugging sympathizers.. Let our Warriors make their families proud.
innyopti 2 years ago
you have stumbled into a conversation that was too mature for you 6 days ago when it was still being discussed.- you have obviously been drinking the corporate cool aid, so just go and help build the empire and dont ask what good it is doing, or who is really benefitting...
Aufhetzer 2 years ago
uhmmmm nope .............you stink
evilchunk1 2 years ago
All we have to do is nuke Mecca, without there most holy city there religion will simpily fall apart.
jetsam50000 2 years ago
Or it would most likely inflame a jihad that would make all muslims in the world - even the ones that where previously friendly - want to burn the USA to the ground. Nuking Meka would cause way more problems then we have right now.
Zulandar 2 years ago 2
Nope, why would Allha allow for such a tragity to befall there holyest of citys? and at the very least, it would become a very good threat to use against them. And if they declare Jihad, sowhat, NATO can easily thwart an uprising.
jetsam50000 2 years ago
Hahha. It recall playing a flash game about 7-8 years ago that involved bombing cities in the middle east. One was Mecca.
I think that as funny as it would be, it is just plain stupid. Kill innocent Muslims (not all will be middle-eastern. They'll be French, Americans, and more) and for what? What are you trying to prove? America nukes civilians? NATO is not going to support such an unprovoked attack on a holy city... Plus, ONE in SIX people in the WORLD are Muslims. Good luck stopping them!
Chinua3 2 years ago
No one will ever attack Mecca, but lets say israel were too be attacked, and it got to a point when they were about to lose. Guess what there gonna blow up?
jetsam50000 2 years ago
So what is your point? If Israel will blow up Mecca, then why do you advocate it?
Back to the point.... nuking Mecca will bring no body any good. If someone blew up Jerusalem, do you think all the Jews and Christians in the world would suddenly became faithless? Hell no! They'd get pissed and kill who ever did it... of course in the name of their God... LOL.
Chinua3 2 years ago
You act as if Muslims and Christian/Jews are the same. In islam Mecca isn't just holy, its part of the 5 pillars. And without one of the Pillars, there religion will simply fall apart.
jetsam50000 2 years ago
Making a pilgrimage to Mecca is a pillar indeed but just cause you nuke their holiest city doesn't mean that they won't become mighty pissed at the bastard who did it. Forget the hajj (the fifth pillar), let's replace it with jihad (the so-called "sixth pillar")!
Your ideas of blowing things up to solve problems are stuck in the 20th century.
Chinua3 2 years ago
Think it like this. Now lets say a Islamic terrorist organization blew up NYC. And we destroy Mecca in retaliation. Acording to Islam Allah is the god of gods. So why would god let the most important city in there religion be destroyed? They have to pray 5 times a day towards Mecca, How can you declare Jihhad when you religion is falling apart.
jetsam50000 2 years ago
Haha ok. Their god is fake. Why don't you just say it, all gods and their respective religions are fake? We all know it. But your logic is faulty. You're assuming that once we bomb them, defy their God, and murder a bunch of innocent pilgrims (not Islamic terrorists) that they will simply say, "Oh dear. Allah is not real for he would not have let Mecca be destroyed" and go away. NO! Just like how the US reacted to 9/11, the Muslim people will be just as angry and retaliate with full force...
Chinua3 2 years ago
9/11 was nothing, it did nothing the Christian faith, infact it acually made it stronger.
And Islam falling apart would not be over night. Yes some people will declare jihhad, and yes some people will stay muslim, besides the fact that theres not city. But if there influence on the world is broken, then it will become a better place.
jetsam50000 2 years ago
"9/11 was nothing, it did nothing the Christian faith, infact it acually made it stronger. "
How do you know it won't do the same to the Muslim faith?
Chinua3 2 years ago
Simple, Islam has 5 pillars. You need to do every one of them. If Mecca were to be destroyed. They could not pray, go on the pilgrimage and preform there dutys as a Muslim. Now i've talked to a Muslim once. I brough up the subject "what would you do if Mecca got hit by a meteor?" He said. "No that just woundn't happen, Allah would stop it." Now just try to imagine your whole belief system were to be proven false. What do you do?
jetsam50000 2 years ago
Lol ok... So in wrecking Mecca you wreck the belief systems of a bunch of Muslims. What do you accomplish? What's so "bad" about them in the first place? And are they really any worse than any other religious group in the world?
Btw, are you atheist, Christian or what??
Chinua3 2 years ago
this is an amazing project whose goal is to make the world a better place. every year millions of people die because they dont have the 12 cent vaccine against malaria, those people arent just statistics they are real people moms and dads baby sisters and brothers, any one of those lives that are saved because of these millenium goals are absolutely worth it. the millenium project is saving peoples lives, how can that be a bad thing?
kirabellaa 3 years ago
What right does someone have to take our money and give it to someone else? Especially someone who isnt American?
DontBeObamaZombies 3 years ago
you don't seem to know how things work. the united states is not an isolated system. what goes outside your tiny little world affects you and your country. here's a tip on how not to be such an idiot - learn about all points of view and the evidence backing each and then think about what you have learned before you believe what some other joe tells you! if you don't YOU ARE THE ZOMBIE, fool.
catutua 3 years ago
REPEAT- What right does someone have to take our money and give it to someone else? Especially by someone who isnt American to someone who isnt American??
Thats Socialism, not American
DontBeObamaZombies 3 years ago
DontBeObamaZombies - right now the american government is taking away our money and giving it to rich people who couldnt manage the money they had so they can go on living well while we loose everything in a slow death of a million cuts, personally i would rather see that money go to feed and educate my brothers and sisters in the world than go to the dogs and if that is socialism so be it.
Aufhetzer 2 years ago
WHO EXACTLY DO YOU THINK IS CAUSING THE STARVATION/DEPOPULATION IN THE FIRST PLACE?!?
"National Security Memorandum 200"
DontBeObamaZombies 2 years ago
right, but from what I read just now (Memorandum 200) and what i read previously on the unesco website, the idea is supposed to be more of a positive lessening of the population than a negative one- in other words, education and birth control as opposed to starvation and forced sterilization. this is something that i am trying to find answers to myself, but in the meantime is it ok to let these people starve? do you have an answer?
Aufhetzer 2 years ago
The Same Military Industrial Complex that controls the UN and whos policy is to depopulate the third world will be the same Organization that will be "preventing them from starving"
Its just like Bill Gates, who donates Billions to "save the children" when what it really does is sterilizes them
DontBeObamaZombies 2 years ago
dont forget that it is also the same Military Industrial Complex that controls the U.S.,
but i am open minded[ can you send me any reliable information (no conspiracy theory garbage) that shows things like the allegations against bill gates mentioned here to be true? its not a challenge, I am curious to see what information you have... I am also curious if you think the world will survive without SOME measure of population control? and if not, then what would You propose as a way to handle it?
Aufhetzer 2 years ago
Even if they are from the new world order, or some other conspiracy.. Why not just help out people. I think the Millennium Development Goals are a great opportunity to learn, and help other people, and ourselves.
Rizo08 3 years ago
Those who've participated and furthered the U.N.'s eugenics program should be put on trial for crimes against humanity. Aborticide is a tenet of eugenics as practiced by Hitler's henchmen. The world can easily sustain thrice the current population. The Sub-Saharan countries are the World Health Organization's laboratory for all things fiendish. The proof of U.N. perfidy is everywhere from within & without.
procommenter 3 years ago
"The world can easily sustain thrice the current population". Buddy, you should take the time to at least EDUCATE yourself, whether you agree or disagree with the intentions of the United Nations. The world can easily sustain three times the current population if we let the majority of people live below North American standards of living and in poverty. If everyone lived like North American's we would need over three planets in order to "sustain ourselves".
bxbrand1 3 years ago
Poverty per capita is at an all-time low. There's more of everything from toilets to roads to buttons & bows. Read something, anything, other than what Oprah suggests. Free yourself. Population reduction starts with you.
procommenter 3 years ago
this is propaganda! The United Nations and CFR, and all governments of the world is part of the New World Order! Wake up people this video is full of lies!
TruthfulTony 3 years ago
The UN Millenium Goals focus is global - not just Africa. And the song in the beginning, who is it by?
belathequeen 3 years ago
I'm glad to see the comments on this are from realist instead of bunch of liberal activist.I guess that wasn't in the budget for the propaganda machine. IT's been 8 years and how much did we(taxpayers)give to who?????
Change won't be coming with Barrack Obama I guaranty it!!! Try Ron Paul in 2012
damon365420 3 years ago
but sustainability is as important as world hunger.
neobattle2 3 years ago
We need to focus on saving OUR COUNTRY before we save the world.
politicalbeachbum 3 years ago 3
this is a con job see section 5 of the Global poverty act states that it goals are in line with the United Nations Millennium Declaration. Do a search for Millennium Declaration and read section 9 of that doc. They want our guns
MilestonesForLife 3 years ago
This is a joke.
xNSxTwizted 3 years ago
it's stupid there are many probs on earth and one think in witch billions of $ are given are millitary uses...i mean there should be peace on earth but nations prefer to spend money on weapons than to help others like africa...or others 4 ppl die each minute in the whole world cuz they don't have water ! omg
Jeseeu 3 years ago
thank the shitty leaders in Africa for squandering funds given to them by the world bank.
migkillertwo 3 years ago
wow, propaganda has made its way to youtube.
MarylandJuly89 3 years ago
Bill Gates has given untold millions to fund the World Health Organization. They've been caught secretly administering abortifacients (drugs or other agents that induce abortions) in serums to third-world women.
procommenter 3 years ago
and just how bad is it that they are giving the choice to abort to a woman in a 3rd world country? I think that if you are not able to support yourself adequately you shouldnt bring other kids along because youre making things worse.
So, in my opinion, yeah, if they want to abort, green light to em! I dont think kids should be brought into this world to suffer.
laurandreina1 1 year ago
Talk is cheap. Have an abortion or participate in an abortion. Satisfy your blood-lust!
procommenter 1 year ago
@laurandreina1 Perhaps so, but with suffering comes joy. It would be fair for them to see this world, trees, sunlight, concrete people. Let them experience laughter, sadness, joy, anger, let them experience things that we have experienced. Personally, I believe that the minute they are created they should experience.
dauya 1 year ago
its a beast with alot of different heads. these heads are different, they have different brains. they do not think alike exactly, but they have to look after the same body, no matter how different they think and appear. the beast's heads will try to unite as one. by imposing thier beliefs on eachother, one head believes in one god, most others another. the wisest one severs himself, but the more clever one believes he is god.
people, pay attention these next few years.
displaced36 3 years ago
man, I completely agree with you on that one!!!
rjep16 3 years ago
I bet a huge food shortage would clean up a lot of unsutainable resources, then Africa could become something that supports life, instead of leading to more suffering.
Jolly158 3 years ago
I think one point that is going unnoticed here is the issue of overpopulation. The famine and the disease, are all primary indications of an areas inability to support a population. I know, "thinning the herd", is a really shitty way to describe theses situations, but if everyone was healthy and prosperous, then ultimately, know one would be. The earth provides enough resources for a certain populace. If we interfere to much we will strain Earths resources, and we will all suffer.
LCon30 3 years ago
Dave Chappelle as Black Bush:
"Hey U.N. sanction me with ur army...ohhh wait you dont have an army!...guess that means you should just shut the fuck up!"
afscn 3 years ago
Wipe out the unnesicary population of Africa. Suddenly you get; infant mortality down, starvation down, poverty, suffering down; use aids, use nukes, reduce the population of a few billion of people who don't have what it takes to be human, and create a utopia for those that remain. What good ever came out of Africa in the last 200 years?
Jolly158 3 years ago
everyone has a right to live and most are children..well we could kill you for what you think this thinking is not human
Jeseeu 3 years ago
well not the UN is bad the ones who are in charge...but not all presidents...and World Control won't ever happen if everything won't be awesome cuz there will always be a Rebelion...like in any conquest and those things...just like you that don't agree with them :)
Jeseeu 3 years ago
The u.n. is the biggest crock of crap on earth. They make up rules that they would never enforce. They do accept large sums of money. If you live in the U.S. it is probably your money.
riidinghard 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"In order to stabilize world population, it is necessary to eliminate 350,000 people a day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say it." — Oceanographer Jacques Cousteau, as quoted in "The Courier," a publication of the U.N. Educational, Scientific & Cultural Organization (U.N.E.S.C.O.)
"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal." — Ted Turner of C.N.N., as quoted in the "McAlvany Intelligence Advisor," 6/96
procommenter 3 years ago
So many people are falling for these rich dicks.
GungHoEastSkiers 3 years ago
No one! They don't really want this! They want you to believe it so everyone will hand over control to their Luciferian organization called The UN so they can have global control! Don't believe me watch watch?v=4yKSDKdDuuQ
antony1985 3 years ago
This is crap! United Nations doesn't want to protect anyone! They want all of us to give control to them to create an one world government! The United Nations are evil! Don't believe me watch watch?v=4yKSDKdDuuQ
antony1985 3 years ago
the UN is CAUSING this food shortage along with the club of rome
Tlk2435asdko43 3 years ago
Of course they are! They want global control! They are founded on the principles of Lucifer! Don't believe me watch watch?v=4yKSDKdDuuQ
antony1985 3 years ago
so i guess the un charter determines who eats and who doesn't?
dellsprospects22 3 years ago
That's exactly what they want! The United Nations wants complete control! The United Nations is evil! Don't believe me check out this video watch?v=4yKSDKdDuuQ
antony1985 3 years ago
even if its communist propaganda. you miss the point. we each have a responsibility as citizens of the world to do something. we all want safety and security for our family and ourselves. start seeing beyond the imaginary lines we call national borders. AND realize that there is no "us" and there is no "them".
isis1moon 3 years ago 2
this is all fairy tales. they want to make a classless society--
DesertOasis07 3 years ago
United Nations Communist propaganda! Research UN agenda 21.
xxmonickkkkaxx 3 years ago
ok, i just read the wiki page. i see no controversy.
Perhaps you should add it to the wiki page if you feel there is one.
roidroid 3 years ago
Oh....and it's the 21st century....an age of Blackberry's, MacBook Air, and commercial space travel....why can't we fill empty bowls with food? Because we are all inherently selfish...it is our demise.
ProlongedKindness 3 years ago 3
I have an issue with 2 of the 8 goals:
1)eradicate extreme poverty & hunger
7)ensure environmental sustainability
Now, with approx. 7 billion in the world, are these 'goals' feasible? They seem to conflict with one another. At our current state, hunger for some, sate for others; we are having issues with sustainability. So the real question is not whether "we" can eradicate hunger and poverty, but can the earth?
ProlongedKindness 3 years ago
Bravo for the UN, what a declaration! They can begin their quest to eradicate "extreme poverty" by using the $1.9 billion the UN has been alloted to renovate their dilapidated headquarters. Why not throw that into the world "tip jar"?
They could get a brand new building for a hell of lot less than almost $2 billion...right?
ProlongedKindness 3 years ago 2
It isn't so much a declaration as an undertaking by 190 nations similar to the 1970 declaration that the OECD nations would donate 0.7% of GDP to foreign aid. To date only 5 small European countries have lived up to their promises.
Tony63efc 3 years ago 2
Are you crazy? You need to read Brave New World. The UN needs to be abolished. Aldous Huxley knew what these World state jerks were doing.
xxmonickkkkaxx 3 years ago
I am not a proponent of the UN. It is an organization consisting of individuals who are corrupted by greed and self-interest; who are given power to further that very greed and self-interest. The UN's foremost objective, world peace keeping, has been overshadowed by the undercurrents of a "One World Government". They are 21st century pirates--rape, pillage and plunder, and the world community allows it. The 'have' and the 'have not' remain at opposite sides of the spectrum. Is there any hope...
ProlongedKindness 3 years ago