Here we have another European worrying about American politics. I've been living in Europe, Scotland, and Germany the last ten years. You spend more time crying about the United States than your own politicians. Trust me; you Europeans should worry about European elections not ours.
from what i hear ,americans don't have elections anymore since the bush takeover,they're mostly too busy eating ,going to megachurches or worrying about gays to care much about it though.but in light of your shining success in the mideast, dragging the whole world into raging lunacy, you probally know better.
Well, you followed us. Of course who is the bigger fool, the one leading, or the one following? You followed us. BUT then again, I support the British troops and don't consider them or any other who fights a Dictator and people who DON'T look the other way foolish. Therefore, if YOU consider the problems in the Mid East horrible, your government is just as much to blame as mine.
Those of us who follow foreign policy know that sometimes our governments support dictators and sometimes just ignore (Pinochet, the Shah, etc) Those dictators who don't cooperate with us are the ones we go after.
the reality of expediency. I wonder why Republican pundits don't pitch Iraq as "righting the wrong" of supporting Sadaam during the Cold War....THAT'S a VALID REASON to invade Iraq!
This was on the air, they took it off, I saw it once, and believe me, living in memphis, you would've seen ALOT of Harold Ford Jr. and Bob Corker ads.
ynot, Foley violated a Federal law by soliciting sex over the Internet with a child under 18. Doesn't matter whether he fucked him or not, he broke the law that, um, was written by Congressman Mark Foley.
And by the way, along with Studds was a Republican, Dan Crane, who was also censured. Studds was re-elected because he was an effective voice for his district.
Crane? Was just another do-nothing pedophile Republican.
Just how many pedophile jokes does it take before even Democrats find this distasteful. Remember, Republican Foley resigned in scandal even though NO SEX was involved. Yet Democrat Gerry Studds HAD SEX with an underage page and his party applauded him and give him a committee chair. Hypocrites, Democrats are.
Okay. You're just wrong! No Democrat to their credit have made ANY jokes or even references to Mark Foley. We're not Democrats and we made this one. AND Studds was stripped of his chairmanship and then his constituents voted him back in. That's Democracy. Please have at least a loose grip on the facts before you try your hand at Republican talking points- how original by the way!
Read the last line to which your question was supposed to be in response to.
It does not do a party any favours, if someone supporting them blindly justifies every flaw, error and silliness--Elephant flaws, errors and silliness, as well as Donkey flaws, errors and silliness.
Parties which refuse to acknowledge errors deserve to lose elections.
And when the party replacing them acts the same way, it isn't for the betterment of America, is it.
To call HKL a low wage earning " Talking Point Robot," is typical of the liberal elite. Studds was wrong, and Rep. leaders should've stopped Foley. NeoConz have "Cut and Run" on the US Constitution - the fabric that keep us from becoming our enemies. True Conservatives need to hold this administration to account. Our educated soldiers are not in Combat Arms. They're in comms or Intel, or Medical units. Kerry, did have a point. He just didn't need to try to make it. Enough already!
Exactly. the one Kerry and Kennedy take to the Vineyard.
Can we be real? Kerry fumbled on 3rd and goal. Dems recovered. But instead of a touchdown, they'll have to settle for a field goal. Good luck winning with that strategy.
Double-check to whom your characterisation should be addressed.
See my response to your first of two posts hitherto.
Because as you see, uhm, "I'm just going with the known facts. I don't jump to radical conclusions to fit my political views (or amateur psychology ventures) as you seem to do."
Are you now shifting the battle to psychic character-evaluations conducted over the internet?
Your arguments are irretrievably demolished, so you resort to self-consoling concocted-conclusions contrary to what the defeat you just suffered shows?
Never mind psychic. Your demonstrated behaviour is evidence that the adjective you used applies to yourself both online and offline.
u guys have gone off topic. the main point of the piece is that the party in power is guilty of hypocrisy and dereliction of duty. the republican congress has failed the country. America deserves better.
What was galling is that he was the chairman of the Caucus of Missing and Exploited Children when he solicited 4 pages. Foley didn't learn from Studd's mistake. What made it worse was the appearance of Foley as a predator (c'mon now, 4 pages). Studds had an affair with one page that was at the age of consent. Although he broke no law, he was censured and stripped of his chairmanship. He later got it back.
Good point. But I'm sure if the shoe were on the other foot, Limbaugh would still be cracking pedophilia jokes at the expense of the DEMs 6 months later. That's just what politics has been reduced to in the good ol USA-- demonize the other party at all cost.
Whereas Bill Clinton survived an impeachment that cost billions of debt dollars midterm and went on to win another 4 years, which he finished without rancor, and sex WAS involved. but it wasn't with an underaged person.
What a load of crap. Next thing you're going to tell me is that the Republicans don't have my best interests at heart, that they use scare tactics for votes and that Sean Hannity isn't the reincarnation of Jesus Christ himself.
Hey now, Republican's aren't ALL hypocritical pedophiles! That is not fair! They aren't ALL bought and paid for by lobbyist either!
I have met an honest Republican Congressman! It was the strangest night of my life. I was hiking up X Files trail and was grabbed by a seven foot tall bigfoot and abducted to it's space ship. That is where I met the congressman. They were probing him...
The irony is... this is SO CLOSE to NOT being parody. You could EASILY find a collection of rethugs to say the very same thing. They really don't THINK much, and would rather sacrifice EVERYTHING USA is supposed to stand for rather than admit they were wrong about the GOP.
Great job. Like one person said, send it to the cable news stations so it can get in the face of millions. Maybe you could add a bit of Blondie's "Call Me" to the audio.
hehe i love boys best place for gays is GayBangz . Com in my opinion
GayBoii888 2 years ago
Get drown on me and dive in come hither for juice on new delight!
fastsexfinder...dot...com
Bethanyisahotty64 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hay msg me on msn messenger if u want 2 cyber! ID is in my profile. D
chibai 3 years ago
hey idiots! it's a parody! what a bunch of fuckn wankers you yanks are.just shutup keep your eyes closed and keep suckn bushs cock,dumb fucks.
gplito 5 years ago
Here we have another European worrying about American politics. I've been living in Europe, Scotland, and Germany the last ten years. You spend more time crying about the United States than your own politicians. Trust me; you Europeans should worry about European elections not ours.
Airborneready 5 years ago 3
from what i hear ,americans don't have elections anymore since the bush takeover,they're mostly too busy eating ,going to megachurches or worrying about gays to care much about it though.but in light of your shining success in the mideast, dragging the whole world into raging lunacy, you probally know better.
gplito 5 years ago
Well, you followed us. Of course who is the bigger fool, the one leading, or the one following? You followed us. BUT then again, I support the British troops and don't consider them or any other who fights a Dictator and people who DON'T look the other way foolish. Therefore, if YOU consider the problems in the Mid East horrible, your government is just as much to blame as mine.
Airborneready 5 years ago
Those of us who follow foreign policy know that sometimes our governments support dictators and sometimes just ignore (Pinochet, the Shah, etc) Those dictators who don't cooperate with us are the ones we go after.
theophano 4 years ago
the reality of expediency. I wonder why Republican pundits don't pitch Iraq as "righting the wrong" of supporting Sadaam during the Cold War....THAT'S a VALID REASON to invade Iraq!
mowriter 4 years ago
I would have voted For Corker, but this is funny.
Cattttt 5 years ago
This was on the air, they took it off, I saw it once, and believe me, living in memphis, you would've seen ALOT of Harold Ford Jr. and Bob Corker ads.
Total Mudslinging.
Shadow155 5 years ago
Grand Old Party? More like Grand Old Orgy.. "The GOO"..
OtisWild 5 years ago
Hey... if you like this one- try our new one- "Last Party Standing" Remember to give us a rating. thanks. Dan
bagelsandmash 5 years ago
Get this betch on the air!
freezelda 5 years ago
ynot, Foley violated a Federal law by soliciting sex over the Internet with a child under 18. Doesn't matter whether he fucked him or not, he broke the law that, um, was written by Congressman Mark Foley.
And by the way, along with Studds was a Republican, Dan Crane, who was also censured. Studds was re-elected because he was an effective voice for his district.
Crane? Was just another do-nothing pedophile Republican.
actor212 5 years ago
Very Nice Job!
actor212 5 years ago
Send this to Colbert!!! Seriously!
SharonCobb 5 years ago
Just how many pedophile jokes does it take before even Democrats find this distasteful. Remember, Republican Foley resigned in scandal even though NO SEX was involved. Yet Democrat Gerry Studds HAD SEX with an underage page and his party applauded him and give him a committee chair. Hypocrites, Democrats are.
ynot4tony2 5 years ago
Okay. You're just wrong! No Democrat to their credit have made ANY jokes or even references to Mark Foley. We're not Democrats and we made this one. AND Studds was stripped of his chairmanship and then his constituents voted him back in. That's Democracy. Please have at least a loose grip on the facts before you try your hand at Republican talking points- how original by the way!
bagelsandmash 5 years ago
Wow, you were in Mark Foley's bedroom making sure he had no sex with pages?
cryan71 5 years ago
Mr Studds having had sex with a minor under his responsibility as a public official constitutes
1 sexual predation
and
2 abuse of public trust
Mr Foley doing the same constitutes
1 sexual predation
and
2 abuse of public trust
It is ludicrous and perverted to portray either one as acceptable.
hkl 5 years ago
Studds - happened in 1973, congressman retired and dead
Foley - 2006 - happened during this election cycle. Shows how corrupt the Republicans are in this election cycle.
Any questions?
cryan71 5 years ago
Not a question as much as a statement on how questionable your logic is:
> Mr Studds is better than Mr Foley because the minor whom the former had sexual relations with stood by him.
> Mr Studd is irrelevant because he recently died.
If you are a typical ass--I mean, Donkey--then it's no better than the Elephants. And that's before getting actual hold of power.
. . .
hkl 5 years ago
From
[] What's-Wrong-With-Paedophilia Studds
[] to Yeeaahh!-Dean
[] to Flip-Flop-
[] and-now-Soldiers-Are-People-Too-Dumb-To-Become-Any-Better Kerry
. . . with allies like you, who needs enemies.
hkl 5 years ago
Typical Republican Talking Point Robot. Probably posted this from the Wall Mart near the Waffle House he works at.
cryan71 5 years ago
Try that again minus the dramatics and the epithets.
After that, try coming up with something less shameful and less ludicrous arguments than
1 "Paedophilia is good as long as the Boy loves the Man."
2 "Our perversions are older than theirs, so we are righteous."
hkl 5 years ago
What the hell does the Dean Scream have to do with anything?
MyNameIsShelby 5 years ago
Read the last line to which your question was supposed to be in response to.
It does not do a party any favours, if someone supporting them blindly justifies every flaw, error and silliness--Elephant flaws, errors and silliness, as well as Donkey flaws, errors and silliness.
Parties which refuse to acknowledge errors deserve to lose elections.
And when the party replacing them acts the same way, it isn't for the betterment of America, is it.
A little clearer to you now, I hope.
hkl 5 years ago
Typical Republican Talking Point Robot
cryan71 5 years ago
To call HKL a low wage earning " Talking Point Robot," is typical of the liberal elite. Studds was wrong, and Rep. leaders should've stopped Foley. NeoConz have "Cut and Run" on the US Constitution - the fabric that keep us from becoming our enemies. True Conservatives need to hold this administration to account. Our educated soldiers are not in Combat Arms. They're in comms or Intel, or Medical units. Kerry, did have a point. He just didn't need to try to make it. Enough already!
jahgriot 5 years ago
Liberal elite? Is that like a new class on Virgin Airlines?
cryan71 5 years ago
Exactly. the one Kerry and Kennedy take to the Vineyard.
Can we be real? Kerry fumbled on 3rd and goal. Dems recovered. But instead of a touchdown, they'll have to settle for a field goal. Good luck winning with that strategy.
jahgriot 5 years ago
I'm sure they can share a ride with the Bushes.
cryan71 5 years ago
If you think I have particular sympathies for Elephants, then you are barking--baying--at the wrong tree.
Read the posts again--paedophile Donkey is no better and no worse than paedophile Elephant.
hkl 5 years ago
I don't see anyone saying either is acceptable. But having sex with a minor is indeed worse than net-sex with one.
ynot4tony2 5 years ago
I
See the cryan71's post three threads above:
> cryan71 (17 hours ago)
> Hmmm.... Gerry Studds page actually stood by his side.
> Mark Foley pages turned him. I wonder why?
II
> having sex with a minor is indeed worse than net-sex with one.
Cryan71's position is diametrically opposite yours:
> Gerry Studds page actually stood by his side
> were you in Mark Foley's bedroom making sure he had no sex with pages?
hkl 5 years ago
I'm just going with the known facts. I don't jump to radical conclusions to fit my political views as you seem to do.
ynot4tony2 5 years ago
Double-check to whom your characterisation should be addressed.
See my response to your first of two posts hitherto.
Because as you see, uhm, "I'm just going with the known facts. I don't jump to radical conclusions to fit my political views (or amateur psychology ventures) as you seem to do."
hkl 5 years ago
You talk tough. But you are porbably a pussy in real life.
cryan71 5 years ago
Are you now shifting the battle to psychic character-evaluations conducted over the internet?
Your arguments are irretrievably demolished, so you resort to self-consoling concocted-conclusions contrary to what the defeat you just suffered shows?
Never mind psychic. Your demonstrated behaviour is evidence that the adjective you used applies to yourself both online and offline.
hkl 5 years ago
u guys have gone off topic. the main point of the piece is that the party in power is guilty of hypocrisy and dereliction of duty. the republican congress has failed the country. America deserves better.
jahgriot 5 years ago
I agree with the first and fourth sentences. (Let's save the rest for another venue.) As I do with your earlier post.
Did you read the part about off-topic, Cryin17? :-p
hkl 5 years ago
> radical conclusions to fit political views
Wrong.
On the contray, the point being made was
[] The matter of sexual predators
[] should be an object of indignation
[] --moral, more than political--outrage
You really should "go with the known facts"--whose existence you will be aware of only if you bother to read.
Read before you "jump to radical conclusions".
hkl 5 years ago
Get a pencil and paper.
Write Studds' name on one side.
Then make a list of ALL the low-life, gay-bashing closeted gay Republican pedophiles on the other side.
Remember to write small, the list is long.
Foley stalking kids for YEARS until he could do it legally is ok w/you?
Are you that much of a Republican, or that much of a pervert? Hypocrite yourself.
roooth29 5 years ago
What was galling is that he was the chairman of the Caucus of Missing and Exploited Children when he solicited 4 pages. Foley didn't learn from Studd's mistake. What made it worse was the appearance of Foley as a predator (c'mon now, 4 pages). Studds had an affair with one page that was at the age of consent. Although he broke no law, he was censured and stripped of his chairmanship. He later got it back.
bumboodc 5 years ago
Gerry Studs? A 1983 incident, more than 20 years ago! You're parroting Hannity and Limbaugh and grasping at straws.
majortomyorke 5 years ago
GIST OF YOUR ARGUMENT:
"Paedophilia--give it time. In a decade or two, you can make it sound innocuous."
North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) slogan?
It is wrong.
Paedophilia is not a matter for political outrage. It is a matter for moral outrage.
A paedophile elephant is as much a paedophile as a paedophile donkey. Political parties are irrelevant to the indignation called for.
hkl 5 years ago
Good point. But I'm sure if the shoe were on the other foot, Limbaugh would still be cracking pedophilia jokes at the expense of the DEMs 6 months later. That's just what politics has been reduced to in the good ol USA-- demonize the other party at all cost.
turdmonster 5 years ago
> demonize the other party at all cost--what politics has been reduced to
Precisely.
And it is wrong.
Especially when political fanaticism leads to attempts to "justify" paedophilia or make a particular case of paedophilia innocuous.
Our outrage should be of the moral, not the political kind. A paedophile elephant is as much a paedophile as a paedophile donkey.
hkl 5 years ago
Whereas Bill Clinton survived an impeachment that cost billions of debt dollars midterm and went on to win another 4 years, which he finished without rancor, and sex WAS involved. but it wasn't with an underaged person.
zwecklosigkeit 5 years ago
This should be on national TV.
hollywoodjinky 5 years ago
30000 people viewed this video today and it's not rated in most viewed. Does anyone know why?
shooliganza 5 years ago
No... I'm new to all this youtube stuff? How does it end up there?
bagelsandmash 5 years ago
"viewed this video" (since it was posted--29 October 2006)
hkl 5 years ago
Nice! The GOP (Grope Our Pages) party in a nutshell. And using Michael J. Fox's stem cells? Classic wingnuttery!
ckthomps 5 years ago
Mark Foley - Gerry Studds
The matter of sexual predators should be an object of moral--more than political--indignation.
hkl 5 years ago
Hmmm.... Gerry Studds page actually stood by his side. Mark Foley pages turned him. I wonder why?
cryan71 5 years ago
Allow me to rephrase:
> Mark Foley - Gerry Studds
> I
> The matter of sexual predators should be an object
> of indignation--moral, more than political--outrage
> II
> Neither one should be seized
> as affirmation of any merits of man-boy love.
hkl 5 years ago
idiot, its gay old pedophiles.
captainatheism 5 years ago
This is the best "ad" ever! Thank you so much for this.
Adso818 5 years ago
What a load of crap. Next thing you're going to tell me is that the Republicans don't have my best interests at heart, that they use scare tactics for votes and that Sean Hannity isn't the reincarnation of Jesus Christ himself.
Yeah, right.
verbalweaponry0 5 years ago
wow, good job!!!
wish i had a video response... i think all i can do is to remember to vote.
fotogail 5 years ago
How appropriate!
hippie4ever 5 years ago
This is the funniest thing I've seen...GREAT!!!
tgraham33 5 years ago
Fair is fair.
hkl 5 years ago
Hey now, Republican's aren't ALL hypocritical pedophiles! That is not fair! They aren't ALL bought and paid for by lobbyist either!
I have met an honest Republican Congressman! It was the strangest night of my life. I was hiking up X Files trail and was grabbed by a seven foot tall bigfoot and abducted to it's space ship. That is where I met the congressman. They were probing him...
He seemed to enjoy it...
nisleib 5 years ago
suweeet!
zbdent 5 years ago
Dayum.
That were so good and timely my toes got all tingly on me.
copymark 5 years ago
Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Serves them right.
Catzmaw 5 years ago
Bring down the Bush regime. www dmocrats org
WWWoDMOCRATSoORG 5 years ago
Touche!!
rick9565 5 years ago
The irony is... this is SO CLOSE to NOT being parody. You could EASILY find a collection of rethugs to say the very same thing. They really don't THINK much, and would rather sacrifice EVERYTHING USA is supposed to stand for rather than admit they were wrong about the GOP.
LMAO.
esotericist 5 years ago
Need to run it in TN!
Martiki 5 years ago
Great job. Like one person said, send it to the cable news stations so it can get in the face of millions. Maybe you could add a bit of Blondie's "Call Me" to the audio.
eeldeal 5 years ago
That page is MINE!
wprange 5 years ago
I love the smell of republicans roasting in the morning. ROFLMAO!
Oilwellian 5 years ago
Fair is fair.
hkl 5 years ago
awesome! send it the cable stations!
donnadem08 5 years ago
sso fucking wrong.
morgan101000 5 years ago
brilliant parody!
lcls92 5 years ago
ha ha ha! I want a bike for christmas!
roadhag 5 years ago
good job! when the page is done being gay, send him my way!
nancpepper 5 years ago
right on
kookookCRAYZAY 5 years ago
Hilarious!
hollywoodjinky 5 years ago
I especially love the tag line. "The Republican Party. So Right, they're wrong!"
kirakira222 5 years ago