you have to be extremely fucking stupid to not see the facts.
And YOU are fcking stupid and ignorant.MOLTEN steel cannot be achieved by burning Jet fuel.Oh but scientist and demolition engineers are fcking stupid anyways.I bet you go to a pet store to get parts for your car.
@koolbossjock you are trying to claim WTC was CD by stating molten metal on a video of a CD??? If molten metal is any indication of CD then where is it in this video??? There is none because controlled demo does not result in molten metal. You fail to logically explain the relevance of your statement. Just like a typical truther someone told you something and with no thought to what it means you blindly repeat it lke the dumb fucking sheep that you are.
@12weasel100 AHHH dude SHUT THE FUCK UP!!! all u do is comment 9/11 shit on every building demolition is this what u do all day everyday?? GET A FUCKING LIFE!!!
@9521johnnyboy thanks for the rambling little rant you dumb fuck. You still fail to provide any facts to support your bullshit you sad piece of dog shit.
SPAM EVERY COMMENT CONTAINING THINGS THAT HAS NOTHING 2 DO WITH THIS VIDEO especially the 9/11 conspiracy theories. I barely watch the beauty and the art of demolition cause so many "you know whos" compare this to WTC. Its sickening. Now bring on the insult replies and video references to pixelized 9/11 videos audio swapped with creepy music SMFH...
@nesiroo He has a point what do u want them to drive a plane into or burn it down THINK ABOUT THE OZONE LAYER U IDIOTS its trhe only way too destroy it
Notice the asymmetry of the collapse. Compare this to the perfect symmetry that all THREE WTC towers had when they collapsed. This symmetry is powerful evidence for controlled demolition.
THINK: why would a building hit by a plane on one side not collapse to that side or suffer a partial collapse on that side. Why would it collapse straight down at or near free fall acceleration?
And that's not even mentioning nano thermite found in the dust.
@152czar The WTC (and the TWIN in particular) were different kind of buildings, No solid concrete, just flexible steel, when heated it just looses strength.
@152czar the towers did not fall straight down they did fall towards the sides of impact it is clear in all videos. It falls at an angle until the remaining columns could not support the shifted load and then then broke. Then gravity took over and the buildings fell straight (gravity will pull things straight down. Your post was complete bullshit.
A bigger question is why is it that you fucking idiot Truthers need to leave some type of bullshit on every CD video that has nothing to do with WTC
@12weasel100 Read my original post. I never said the towers fell straight down. I said then fell down with near perfect symmetry. And they did not fall in direction of impact. They exploded out in all directions.
@152czar yes they did begin to fall in the direction of impact just because you choose to ignore that fact does not disprove it. It only proves you are willing to close your eyes and accept bullshit and lies as a fake reality. Sorry but you fail to prove anything other than you are a moron. Try making up some more lies the ones you spewed out are old and proven wrong.
@12weasel100 The deviation from near perfect symmetry was minute. You are the one who needs to reexamine the videos.
In particular, please examine the video of the collapse of building 7 which had no noticeable tilt whatsoever even though it was hit from burning debris on only one side.
@152czar Builds all around WTC7 were damaged so it did not fall nearly symmetrical. And it was leaning and in trouble. There are clear recordings of firefighters stating the building is leaning and in trouble it will fall there is no way to save it. Just because you choose not to listen or see does not mean it did not occur. It only means you are an ignorant cunt that prefers to live in fantasy and denial. You moron.
@152czar Let me ask you 152 something. Where were the repeated explosions that are seen and heard in every controlled demolition? And I don't mean the few flare ups you saw when the building was already coming down or one or two rumblings that sounded like bombs. I mean a clear visible and audible repeated boom boom boom boom boom boom boom for 20 or more seconds before it came down? Oh that's right there were none. You can point out a couple rooms in the towers that lit up as it came down.
@AdamBomb669 and a couple explosions, which could have been, I don't know, fucking pockets of oxygen exploding from contact with fire, or maybe portions of the inside of the building breaking down and collapsing. But there is absolutely zero evidence that it was any kind of an intended demolition and you have to be extremely fucking stupid to not see the facts. And not the conspiritard facts that you idiots made up. The real fucking facts. Shut the fuck up and suck Alex Jones cock.
@AdamBomb669 Well there is no reason to suspect that the demolition of the WTC buildings was conventional; in fact the presence of the nanothermite attests to its highly unusual nature. Nanothermite is more of an incindiary than an explosive (although it could be used for either purpose). So there is a reason that it was quite: nanothermite was used and thermite doesn't go "BOOOOOOM" it goes "boom."
OH SHIT ! I wanted to get a job there. I heard it was pretty busy there, everyone rushing to rent rooms in freaken Bei Fckg rut. Yeah baby. I vote to have our next convention over there. Bring your own shelter, body armor, transportation, food, and death certificate.
was`nt much left for the Demo guys the Isreali Airforce stripped it for them in adance, ah yes Strategic Eviction to make way for a car park for a already burnt-out supermarket! when the Isreali army went Shopping Down-town Beirut in tank instead of station wagons!
@gloomyoutlook absolutely agree woth you when ever Isreal go beyond their boundries they bomb the shit out of any down-town areas be Jordon, Lebanon, Eygpt, Palestine well any place!
@66Metallicaman66 there you go another dumb american moron with dumb useless jokes about this norris guy ...man i dont know why those usless jokes comes out all the time its not even funny i swere to god..
@sdavidson1969 where u there ? Ofc no one would here them.,. All people are screaming, + there are explosions going in the Top Floors because the Plane crashed causing a firte Making Explosions of Gas, Electricity. So unless u were there STFU haha
@TheLiquidSolid thanks for your coherent response. i base what i write on what people who were there, at ground zero, have said. you may have a handful of people who want to believe a conspircy exists so they will say they heard something that did not take place. but i tend to believe the thousands upon thousands who were there and did not hear any type of explosions. also a suggestion, if you want people to take you serious, learn how to construct a complete sentence.
We Americans are so FN stupid.... look at all these video clips of sky scrappers being imploded and the similarities to how the WTC buildings came down. IMPLOADED from within.... Open your eyes people. A man hiding in a cave half way around the world took the WTC down??? Give me a FN break!!!
@MrTodd52 no, debris from the twin toward striking the building did some damage and then the fires buring on the inside did as well. no one near the building when it fell heard any sound like this when the building fell. i have also heard that the loose change wackos did not put the audio of this video in their documentary because it would prove them false.
to Gummage06 it was nothing like the WTC. That was an act of war on an nation at peace. By cowards In the name of Islam. A so called religion of peace?
Wow its almost like the twin tower in New York but without the planes. Mind you if the planes did'nt reach their destination for some unforeseen reason the World Trade Centre would have come down anyway from all the nano thermite explosives the CIA and Mossad packed in there!
You mean the sulfur based dry wall the "packed in there" in 1973? "Wow, its almost like the twin tower in New York but without the planes." Yeah! Especially the part where the extremely loud explosions went off from inside the buildings! Oh, wait, there are no loud explosions just before the collapse in any 9/11 videos.... Who care's it's still controlled demolition.
The Hilton Hotel never saw the light because of the civil war and when the war was over the building was way far from up to date architectural designs
I was there and it wasn't a 100% successful implosion since the top section wasn't demolished and fell right in the middle of the street
because whenever someone sees a video of a building collapsing they always start an argument on 9/11. It's just another fact about YouTubes dumbass members.
i'd like to dedicate my new video to the memory of lisa beamers husband, who died valiantly crashing flight 93 into a hole which was already there, may he rest in pieces, where ever they may be.
If it's a government agency, it is not valid proof.
If someone was blaming someone for the death of 3000 people and a war against a country who may not have done a thing, you better believe that they are going to lie their ass off.
WTC7 was obviously controlled demolition, synchronized with WTC1 or WTC2, or maybe taken down because it was basically dead in the first place to the firefighters.
The Pentagon was hit by a missile, that one is obvious.
Twin Towers were hit by non-commercial airplanes with possible bombs.
Flight [forgot number] is the most confusing aspect as no one really has proof of what the hell happened.
Now, it's either an orchestrated military attack, or from our own government.
Too bad the National Institute of Standards and Technologies has already proven what caused the World Trade Center buildings to collapse. For towers 1 and 2 is was global collapse caused by destruction of key supports thanks to the impact of the planes, destruction of key supports caused weight to be redistributed to the remaining columns, to bad those were being weakened by fire.
Building 7 collapsed thanks to fire induced progressive collapse via thermal expansion.
Your explanation makes complete sense...until the fact that the buildings fell at free fall speed comes into consideration.
Since you seem to have all the answers, can you plz explain that? I mean NIST even admitted the building fell at free fall...I would like to see you pull off some magic explaining that...
Wrong, NIST admitted freefall for only the second stage of descent. Also, had you actually READ the NIST report, you would see why freefall speed for WTC7 during stage 2 of descent is not at all odd.
Freefall speed during stage 2 of descent (there are three stages) was a result of the progressive collapse mechanism. Progressive collapse took out all significant support columns that would provide any resistance, that and the fact that mostly the frame of the building actually fell.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Shack11, you are so right, I to believe that the WTC was an inside job, Bush was not doing so well in the poles and America was still pissed off at the whole Gore thing, and the Airlines were failing. What better way to have america get behind a President than an attack. which He did, and We did. also a great reason to start a war., sorry folks, The WTC buildings were a controled demo A special team was sent in 2 weeks before and set it up and molten thermite was activated 2 days before.
so, no one in those towers noticed the bombs, the passengers on the plane evaporated, and everyone who saw a plane at the pentagon were drugged. your a drug addict.
hahahahahahahahaha, Bush was not doing so well in the "poles" !! so he did 9/11. it must be the most retarded reason to make a conspiracy of that magnitude that probably require the cooperation of thousands of people and government institutions and airline companies who keep secret very very well and perhaps hate their country so much,
wow! all the planning, all the explosives only took a week to do this...incredible!
Strange that CDI also has a USA government contract (90% of their buisness comes from the US government)but whats even weirder is the fact that the building fell exactly like the twin towers and building 7! Suppose its just another amazing coincidence amongst the hundreds that are apparent within the official 9/11 story
No it didn't. It did not fall down like the world trade centers.
For one, the multiple load explosions were not heard when building 7 collapsed due to critical support column # 79 buckling due to losing it's connection to the steel support beams of floor 13 via thermically induced expansion.
have you ever heard of thermite? it doesnt sound like explosives but it can be used to demolish buildings (it cuts through steel)...look it up...they found evidence of thermite used in the dust and molten metal underneath wtc tower 7...and yes they kinda did fall like the wtc buildings...this building in the video fell at free fall speed and so did all three towers...what more do you need to see?
Like I said, only explosives could've brought down WTC7, no sound of such level was heard. And the National Institute of Standards and Technologies have proven that using thermite would be impossible seeing as thermite cannot sever vertical beams of such size due to gravity and nothing to continuously hold the thermite in place while it burns.
Traces of thermite was only found because clean up crews used it to slice the small beams into smaller pieces for cleanup.
When you are an old man, you are going to look back and be terribly embarrassed that you waisted at least 7+ years of your life obsessing over this. Take a FREAKING CLUE, you and your elitist circle of conspiracy nuts havent been able to come up with anything new for years. You just blather on about the same old garbage. Its really just embarrassing. Get a fucking life. Really.
hey man...i know you said this a long time ago...(bashing 911"truthers") but more clues are coming about...GOOGLE THIS: Engineers and Architects for 9/11 Truth. There are more than conspiracy nuts out there suppoting another investigation...listen to what they have to say..dont just call them losers..open up man.I'm serious. Im not on one side or the other. But i read and hear a lot of debunkers calling conspiracy supports names and insulting them...not real professional or convincing.
Just because you have a few "experts" doesn't mean anything. Just being a professional isn't proof for anything. Publishing SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEWED papers is what matters. And for suhc a confident group, they haven't published on. Because they know the peer review process will spit up their garbage that moment they turn it in.
There are MANY more experts who agree with the official stance. Don't kid yourself, the science is on our side I'm afraid.
The dust they studied was found the DAY of the attacks...many blocks away from GZ...btw you maybe right about the "just bc a a few experts". but being the government doesnt mean you are right either. retracting on a lot of claims from NIST only makes them less credible. I am simply saying if there are credible people questioning the gov then i think some sort of independent investigation should be done.
BTW Youtube: Linear Thermite Cutting Charges...vertical beam being cut...
No, being the government doesn't make us right. Using proper science and having evidence derived from scientific research does. Thanks to the report from the National Institute of Standards and Technologies, we know exactly what brought those buildings down.
Then again, you truthers never had a knack for science.
I suggest going to ae911truth(dot)org and watch the video with richard gage (left side of home page)
Skip all the way to 32:45 in the 2 hour video and watch John Gross the lead engineer lie to this group of people...its blatant and quite comical its so obvious he is lying.
Hey, Buergs323, like I said, the NIST has already concluded that thermite could not have severed key support columns of such size. With beams weighing several hundred tons and incredibly thick, thermite could not have completely severed it. Not only is it impossible to vertically sever beams of such size, linear thermite charges don't nearly have enough power or amount of thermite needed.
Maybe you should try to PROVE NIST wrong, rather than say they're lying without any evidence. Think plz.
Dude did you even bother to go to that website and find that peer reviewed article?? Or go to the video where NIST claims there was no eye witness accounts of molten metal and the next clip there are firemen and witnesses talking about molten metal? Dude these are independent scientists that are looking at the facts. Regardless of what you try to disprove about thermite; you never try to give an explanation as to why the molten metal was ever there.
Since I cannot post any links on youtube I'll do my best to direct you to it.
Visit ae911truth(dot)org
Slide your mouse over "Resources"
Click on "Techincal Articles"
Click on the second link: Active Thermitic Material Discovered....
9 Scientists and Physicists discuss 4 samples of thermite being found in dust...this article is no joke and this to me is a very legit argument for other people who question the official stories...
You're taking it out of context. The dude from NIST did not say there weren't molten pools of metal, he said he did not know of anyone who's seen it. The video then proceeds to show testimony from people I assume the guy has never met.
Guess what? There are only 3 peer-reviewed papers on that site, and none of them deal with issues that refute the NIST report. They merely present more questions, which the NIST promptly answered. The Active Thermite Materials journal was already explained by the fact that a lot of thermite was used in clean up immediately. Not to mention that the components of thermite are found in any building.
Please try better than simply shouting "shill" and "Wake up". You sound like a simpleton.
"The Active Thermite Materials journal was already explained by the fact that a lot of thermite was used in clean up immediately."
HAHAHAHA you are really reaching arent you. Really quite comical how you suggest that thermite was used in the clean up. Absolutely obsurd! You are the one that sounds like a simpleton with that comment.
NIST also admits that WTC7 fell at free fall, they didnt explain how because free fall speed is only possible when explosives/incendiaries are used.
Yes, it's totally far fetched to have clean up crews using thermite to cut through some metal bars for ease in cleanup.
It's a known fact that clean up crews used thermite to cut some of the metal bars to make for easier cleanup. Don't be ignorant, whoops, too late.
Also, NIST only said one stage of the three stage collapse sequence was in freefall speed. Freefall is a symptom of progressive collapse seeing as all supports failed during the process.
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice video.
This is my site. there is many cute videos.
hotels-informed.blogspot.com
add me as friend on facebook.
marie.anne1000@yahoo.com
silomorgy1 3 months ago
you have to be extremely fucking stupid to not see the facts.
And YOU are fcking stupid and ignorant.MOLTEN steel cannot be achieved by burning Jet fuel.Oh but scientist and demolition engineers are fcking stupid anyways.I bet you go to a pet store to get parts for your car.
koolbossjock 4 months ago
@koolbossjock you are trying to claim WTC was CD by stating molten metal on a video of a CD??? If molten metal is any indication of CD then where is it in this video??? There is none because controlled demo does not result in molten metal. You fail to logically explain the relevance of your statement. Just like a typical truther someone told you something and with no thought to what it means you blindly repeat it lke the dumb fucking sheep that you are.
Truthers are fucking idiots.
12weasel100 4 months ago 3
@12weasel100 AHHH dude SHUT THE FUCK UP!!! all u do is comment 9/11 shit on every building demolition is this what u do all day everyday?? GET A FUCKING LIFE!!!
9521johnnyboy 1 week ago
@9521johnnyboy thanks for the rambling little rant you dumb fuck. You still fail to provide any facts to support your bullshit you sad piece of dog shit.
12weasel100 4 days ago
SPAM EVERY COMMENT CONTAINING THINGS THAT HAS NOTHING 2 DO WITH THIS VIDEO especially the 9/11 conspiracy theories. I barely watch the beauty and the art of demolition cause so many "you know whos" compare this to WTC. Its sickening. Now bring on the insult replies and video references to pixelized 9/11 videos audio swapped with creepy music SMFH...
Maymona13 5 months ago
WAIT I forgot to lock my windows
LfcGoddardENGCJG 7 months ago
@nesiroo He has a point what do u want them to drive a plane into or burn it down THINK ABOUT THE OZONE LAYER U IDIOTS its trhe only way too destroy it
jangofett1014 7 months ago
Oh snap! Another office fire!
KmanMonkeyPig 8 months ago
the new one they built was nicer anyway :)
MrSweetlife92 9 months ago
Notice the asymmetry of the collapse. Compare this to the perfect symmetry that all THREE WTC towers had when they collapsed. This symmetry is powerful evidence for controlled demolition.
THINK: why would a building hit by a plane on one side not collapse to that side or suffer a partial collapse on that side. Why would it collapse straight down at or near free fall acceleration?
And that's not even mentioning nano thermite found in the dust.
Google scholar: active thermitic material
152czar 9 months ago
@152czar The WTC (and the TWIN in particular) were different kind of buildings, No solid concrete, just flexible steel, when heated it just looses strength.
MaxwellEindhoven 8 months ago
@152czar yes, they built it in during construction in 1972, along with the 12.000 holes for the explosives, you silly :-)
sonnylatchstring 6 months ago
@152czar the towers did not fall straight down they did fall towards the sides of impact it is clear in all videos. It falls at an angle until the remaining columns could not support the shifted load and then then broke. Then gravity took over and the buildings fell straight (gravity will pull things straight down. Your post was complete bullshit.
A bigger question is why is it that you fucking idiot Truthers need to leave some type of bullshit on every CD video that has nothing to do with WTC
12weasel100 6 months ago
@12weasel100 Read my original post. I never said the towers fell straight down. I said then fell down with near perfect symmetry. And they did not fall in direction of impact. They exploded out in all directions.
Google scholar: active thermitic materials
152czar 5 months ago
@152czar yes they did begin to fall in the direction of impact just because you choose to ignore that fact does not disprove it. It only proves you are willing to close your eyes and accept bullshit and lies as a fake reality. Sorry but you fail to prove anything other than you are a moron. Try making up some more lies the ones you spewed out are old and proven wrong.
12weasel100 5 months ago
@12weasel100 The deviation from near perfect symmetry was minute. You are the one who needs to reexamine the videos.
In particular, please examine the video of the collapse of building 7 which had no noticeable tilt whatsoever even though it was hit from burning debris on only one side.
152czar 5 months ago
@152czar Builds all around WTC7 were damaged so it did not fall nearly symmetrical. And it was leaning and in trouble. There are clear recordings of firefighters stating the building is leaning and in trouble it will fall there is no way to save it. Just because you choose not to listen or see does not mean it did not occur. It only means you are an ignorant cunt that prefers to live in fantasy and denial. You moron.
12weasel100 5 months ago
@12weasel100 You need to listen to the videos again.
152czar 5 months ago
@152czar and you need an education you moron.
12weasel100 5 months ago
@12weasel100 You need to google scholar search: ACTIVE THERMITIC MATERIALS.
152czar 5 months ago
@152czar and you need an education you moron.
12weasel100 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@12weasel100 You need to google scholar search: ACTIVE THERMITIC MATERIALS.
You need to google scholar search: ACTIVE THERMITIC MATERIALS.
152czar 5 months ago
@152czar Let me ask you 152 something. Where were the repeated explosions that are seen and heard in every controlled demolition? And I don't mean the few flare ups you saw when the building was already coming down or one or two rumblings that sounded like bombs. I mean a clear visible and audible repeated boom boom boom boom boom boom boom for 20 or more seconds before it came down? Oh that's right there were none. You can point out a couple rooms in the towers that lit up as it came down.
AdamBomb669 5 months ago
@AdamBomb669 and a couple explosions, which could have been, I don't know, fucking pockets of oxygen exploding from contact with fire, or maybe portions of the inside of the building breaking down and collapsing. But there is absolutely zero evidence that it was any kind of an intended demolition and you have to be extremely fucking stupid to not see the facts. And not the conspiritard facts that you idiots made up. The real fucking facts. Shut the fuck up and suck Alex Jones cock.
AdamBomb669 5 months ago
@AdamBomb669 Well there is no reason to suspect that the demolition of the WTC buildings was conventional; in fact the presence of the nanothermite attests to its highly unusual nature. Nanothermite is more of an incindiary than an explosive (although it could be used for either purpose). So there is a reason that it was quite: nanothermite was used and thermite doesn't go "BOOOOOOM" it goes "boom."
152czar 5 months ago
Thumbs up if you only clicked on this video because you recognise the building from Loose Change.
plusplusplusplusp 10 months ago
@plusplusplusplusp haha no one did.
sturmraist50 10 months ago
@sturmraist50
Well. Obviously I'm the only one. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but Loose Change was interesting even if what is says isn't true.
plusplusplusplusp 10 months ago
wheres the plane?
thedynamite85 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Probably cost them a million bucks to wire that thing and blow it.
They could have made a phone call to their local Hamas office and get a suicide truck bomber to take it down for a lot less.
ironhorzmn 11 months ago
Comment removed
ironhorzmn 11 months ago
Isn't it wered how you new that bilding was going to do that
brandon3764 1 year ago
god damn these demolition videos are entertaining! :D
xAvispar 1 year ago
who ever farted in there....GOOD JOB MAN...!!!!
KEEP ON FARTIN' :D
ahsanfiaz100 1 year ago
OH SHIT ! I wanted to get a job there. I heard it was pretty busy there, everyone rushing to rent rooms in freaken Bei Fckg rut. Yeah baby. I vote to have our next convention over there. Bring your own shelter, body armor, transportation, food, and death certificate.
chivone21 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Oh my god, it's Al-Qaida!
popopipipupupepe 1 year ago
why is any thing disasterous is linked with Paris Hilton or Chuck Norris!!!!
Bignadim 1 year ago
@Bignadim Good question! The Chuck Norris thing is everywhere and is seriously annoying!
NightwishQueen1 1 year ago
was`nt much left for the Demo guys the Isreali Airforce stripped it for them in adance, ah yes Strategic Eviction to make way for a car park for a already burnt-out supermarket! when the Isreali army went Shopping Down-town Beirut in tank instead of station wagons!
Bignadim 1 year ago
@Bignadim
lol
fuck israel
gloomyoutlook 1 year ago
@gloomyoutlook absolutely agree woth you when ever Isreal go beyond their boundries they bomb the shit out of any down-town areas be Jordon, Lebanon, Eygpt, Palestine well any place!
Bignadim 1 year ago
WHY, CHUCK NORRIS?! WHY DO YOU ALWAYS HAVE TO DIVIDE BY ZERO?!?!
66Metallicaman66 1 year ago
@66Metallicaman66 hahahaha!!!
richardsbrandon5027 1 year ago
@66Metallicaman66 there you go another dumb american moron with dumb useless jokes about this norris guy ...man i dont know why those usless jokes comes out all the time its not even funny i swere to god..
XlivinghouseX 1 year ago
Does someone really has to make a 9/11 reference to EVERY demolition video?
Maymona13 1 year ago
they must have used jet fuel for this one.
tedmaulz 1 year ago
Looks kinda fimiliar. i dunno something with the name of 9/something. OH YH 9/11
TheLiquidSolid 1 year ago
@TheLiquidSolid right, except no one heard the explosions going off inside wtc 7 because there were none.
sdavidson1969 1 year ago
@sdavidson1969 where u there ? Ofc no one would here them.,. All people are screaming, + there are explosions going in the Top Floors because the Plane crashed causing a firte Making Explosions of Gas, Electricity. So unless u were there STFU haha
TheLiquidSolid 1 year ago
@TheLiquidSolid thanks for your coherent response. i base what i write on what people who were there, at ground zero, have said. you may have a handful of people who want to believe a conspircy exists so they will say they heard something that did not take place. but i tend to believe the thousands upon thousands who were there and did not hear any type of explosions. also a suggestion, if you want people to take you serious, learn how to construct a complete sentence.
sdavidson1969 1 year ago
@sdavidson1969 Dude, arguing with truthers is like arguing with a three year old about Santa Claus. I sympathize, but you're wasting your time.
cugamer 1 year ago
@cugamer yeah i know but it does bring out a warped way of thinking by them which if it were not such a tragic event would be comical.
sdavidson1969 1 year ago
damn that looks just like wtc 7
shreim1 1 year ago
We Americans are so FN stupid.... look at all these video clips of sky scrappers being imploded and the similarities to how the WTC buildings came down. IMPLOADED from within.... Open your eyes people. A man hiding in a cave half way around the world took the WTC down??? Give me a FN break!!!
MrTodd52 1 year ago
@MrTodd52
I want to know where they obtained the silent explosives.
Wolliom 1 year ago
@Wolliom Listen to those they interviewed out on the streets moments after the towers fell... they weren't silent buddy.
MrTodd52 1 year ago
@MrTodd52 no, debris from the twin toward striking the building did some damage and then the fires buring on the inside did as well. no one near the building when it fell heard any sound like this when the building fell. i have also heard that the loose change wackos did not put the audio of this video in their documentary because it would prove them false.
sdavidson1969 1 year ago
to Gummage06 it was nothing like the WTC. That was an act of war on an nation at peace. By cowards In the name of Islam. A so called religion of peace?
howarduck417 1 year ago
Wow its almost like the twin tower in New York but without the planes. Mind you if the planes did'nt reach their destination for some unforeseen reason the World Trade Centre would have come down anyway from all the nano thermite explosives the CIA and Mossad packed in there!
Gummage06 1 year ago
@Gummage06
You mean the sulfur based dry wall the "packed in there" in 1973? "Wow, its almost like the twin tower in New York but without the planes." Yeah! Especially the part where the extremely loud explosions went off from inside the buildings! Oh, wait, there are no loud explosions just before the collapse in any 9/11 videos.... Who care's it's still controlled demolition.
Wolliom 1 year ago
@Wolliom - Damn straight 9/11 was an inside job!
Gummage06 1 year ago
The Hilton Hotel never saw the light because of the civil war and when the war was over the building was way far from up to date architectural designs
I was there and it wasn't a 100% successful implosion since the top section wasn't demolished and fell right in the middle of the street
ELPQF 1 year ago
hell yeah blow the hiltons off the earth
yublens 1 year ago
was that a hilton? ;o
Heejheej94 2 years ago
Oh for Godssakes... on every demolition video people keep on saying that WTC was a controlled explosion... obviously jews did 9/11.
LinuxPython 2 years ago
When will they stick explosives into Paris Hilton, then?
lago4 2 years ago 5
There's been literally hundreds of explosions inside Paris Hilton dude..
source1zero 2 years ago
That made my day LMFAO!!!
lago4 2 years ago
because whenever someone sees a video of a building collapsing they always start an argument on 9/11. It's just another fact about YouTubes dumbass members.
Nesiroo 2 years ago 50
@Nesiroo 9 months ago with 11 thumbs up? Strange...
EmuNerd 1 year ago
@EmuNerd lol ur a conspiracy nut
shreim1 1 year ago
@shreim1 Nah, it's just something I noticed. Chill, Lol.
EmuNerd 1 year ago
@Nesiroo The goverment destroyed the twin towers!!!!!!
e104jokerr 1 year ago
@Nesiroo It's called democracy, I know, just sit down and shut up and don't ask any questions, the governments got it under controll!
Allanlegacy43 11 months ago
@Nesiroo
Yeah, they should stop talking so much about the fall of the berlin wall.
Jesus45U 4 months ago
WTH why are people saying this is the World Trade Center (WTC)?
shawnman5123 2 years ago 4
Kick ass implosion
theblackgold123 2 years ago 4
i'd like to dedicate my new video to the memory of lisa beamers husband, who died valiantly crashing flight 93 into a hole which was already there, may he rest in pieces, where ever they may be.
EarthsGravitySucks 2 years ago
hey, it's a building falling down, let's discuss 9/11!
MrEmarkable 2 years ago
I hope Paris Hilton was in there .
BunniesAreLoved 2 years ago 80
If only.
biped19 2 years ago
@BunniesAreLoved is it cause u dnt like her sex tape lol
05eherash 1 year ago
I'll make it simple.
If it's a government agency, it is not valid proof.
If someone was blaming someone for the death of 3000 people and a war against a country who may not have done a thing, you better believe that they are going to lie their ass off.
Shack11 2 years ago
WTC7 was obviously controlled demolition, synchronized with WTC1 or WTC2, or maybe taken down because it was basically dead in the first place to the firefighters.
The Pentagon was hit by a missile, that one is obvious.
Twin Towers were hit by non-commercial airplanes with possible bombs.
Flight [forgot number] is the most confusing aspect as no one really has proof of what the hell happened.
Now, it's either an orchestrated military attack, or from our own government.
Now, STFU.
Shack11 2 years ago
Too bad the National Institute of Standards and Technologies has already proven what caused the World Trade Center buildings to collapse. For towers 1 and 2 is was global collapse caused by destruction of key supports thanks to the impact of the planes, destruction of key supports caused weight to be redistributed to the remaining columns, to bad those were being weakened by fire.
Building 7 collapsed thanks to fire induced progressive collapse via thermal expansion.
McMcMeaty 2 years ago
Your explanation makes complete sense...until the fact that the buildings fell at free fall speed comes into consideration.
Since you seem to have all the answers, can you plz explain that? I mean NIST even admitted the building fell at free fall...I would like to see you pull off some magic explaining that...
Buergs323 2 years ago
Wrong, NIST admitted freefall for only the second stage of descent. Also, had you actually READ the NIST report, you would see why freefall speed for WTC7 during stage 2 of descent is not at all odd.
Freefall speed during stage 2 of descent (there are three stages) was a result of the progressive collapse mechanism. Progressive collapse took out all significant support columns that would provide any resistance, that and the fact that mostly the frame of the building actually fell.
McMcMeaty 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Shack11, you are so right, I to believe that the WTC was an inside job, Bush was not doing so well in the poles and America was still pissed off at the whole Gore thing, and the Airlines were failing. What better way to have america get behind a President than an attack. which He did, and We did. also a great reason to start a war., sorry folks, The WTC buildings were a controled demo A special team was sent in 2 weeks before and set it up and molten thermite was activated 2 days before.
setpaintertim 2 years ago
so, no one in those towers noticed the bombs, the passengers on the plane evaporated, and everyone who saw a plane at the pentagon were drugged. your a drug addict.
sadakokid45 2 years ago 2
WTC7.?
Solv0Mens 2 years ago
hahahahahahahahaha, Bush was not doing so well in the "poles" !! so he did 9/11. it must be the most retarded reason to make a conspiracy of that magnitude that probably require the cooperation of thousands of people and government institutions and airline companies who keep secret very very well and perhaps hate their country so much,
undocumentedspot 2 years ago
grow up!!
stephenjdavies 2 years ago
Comment removed
AdstedoBmxsta 2 years ago
just listen to yourself ....
T1carus 2 years ago
goddamn! you are stupid
catbonez 2 years ago
it's like WTC 7
Szydo 2 years ago
did u see the shock wave go up the building. it was very close to the begaining. Then the whole thing cracked and then you know what happens nexts.
ginsy13 2 years ago
fuck israelllll
Libaneeees 2 years ago
when was this ?
zekiller2 3 years ago
was the building damaged by the demolition?
smartestinUSA 3 years ago 3
r u fucking stupid didnt you see it coming down you fucking dumbass
jersonvzor 3 years ago
INTERNET RAGE!!!!
McMcMeaty 3 years ago
No.Superman caught before it hit the ground.
redstone1963 3 years ago
haha. I hope it stayed there... It isn't possible that building is in one thousand pieces by now... nope..
(sarcasm... for the dumbass smartass idiots)
Beatboxer3lliot 3 years ago
DUMBASS ALERT
no it wasnt damaged it was destroyed MORON
MICmasterstorm 2 years ago
wow! all the planning, all the explosives only took a week to do this...incredible!
Strange that CDI also has a USA government contract (90% of their buisness comes from the US government)but whats even weirder is the fact that the building fell exactly like the twin towers and building 7! Suppose its just another amazing coincidence amongst the hundreds that are apparent within the official 9/11 story
ousamadidndoit 3 years ago
No it didn't. It did not fall down like the world trade centers.
For one, the multiple load explosions were not heard when building 7 collapsed due to critical support column # 79 buckling due to losing it's connection to the steel support beams of floor 13 via thermically induced expansion.
McMcMeaty 3 years ago
have you ever heard of thermite? it doesnt sound like explosives but it can be used to demolish buildings (it cuts through steel)...look it up...they found evidence of thermite used in the dust and molten metal underneath wtc tower 7...and yes they kinda did fall like the wtc buildings...this building in the video fell at free fall speed and so did all three towers...what more do you need to see?
Buergs323 2 years ago
Wrong.
Like I said, only explosives could've brought down WTC7, no sound of such level was heard. And the National Institute of Standards and Technologies have proven that using thermite would be impossible seeing as thermite cannot sever vertical beams of such size due to gravity and nothing to continuously hold the thermite in place while it burns.
Traces of thermite was only found because clean up crews used it to slice the small beams into smaller pieces for cleanup.
McMcMeaty 2 years ago
When you are an old man, you are going to look back and be terribly embarrassed that you waisted at least 7+ years of your life obsessing over this. Take a FREAKING CLUE, you and your elitist circle of conspiracy nuts havent been able to come up with anything new for years. You just blather on about the same old garbage. Its really just embarrassing. Get a fucking life. Really.
philritter21 3 years ago
phil, what are you talking about? What do you value in life, the conspiracy nuts are trying to help people.
farttalk45 2 years ago 2
hey man...i know you said this a long time ago...(bashing 911"truthers") but more clues are coming about...GOOGLE THIS: Engineers and Architects for 9/11 Truth. There are more than conspiracy nuts out there suppoting another investigation...listen to what they have to say..dont just call them losers..open up man.I'm serious. Im not on one side or the other. But i read and hear a lot of debunkers calling conspiracy supports names and insulting them...not real professional or convincing.
Buergs323 2 years ago
Just because you have a few "experts" doesn't mean anything. Just being a professional isn't proof for anything. Publishing SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEWED papers is what matters. And for suhc a confident group, they haven't published on. Because they know the peer review process will spit up their garbage that moment they turn it in.
There are MANY more experts who agree with the official stance. Don't kid yourself, the science is on our side I'm afraid.
McMcMeaty 2 years ago
The dust they studied was found the DAY of the attacks...many blocks away from GZ...btw you maybe right about the "just bc a a few experts". but being the government doesnt mean you are right either. retracting on a lot of claims from NIST only makes them less credible. I am simply saying if there are credible people questioning the gov then i think some sort of independent investigation should be done.
BTW Youtube: Linear Thermite Cutting Charges...vertical beam being cut...
Buergs323 2 years ago
No, being the government doesn't make us right. Using proper science and having evidence derived from scientific research does. Thanks to the report from the National Institute of Standards and Technologies, we know exactly what brought those buildings down.
Then again, you truthers never had a knack for science.
McMcMeaty 2 years ago
BTW: Scientists want the truth too...
Is NIST telling the truth??
I suggest going to ae911truth(dot)org and watch the video with richard gage (left side of home page)
Skip all the way to 32:45 in the 2 hour video and watch John Gross the lead engineer lie to this group of people...its blatant and quite comical its so obvious he is lying.
Buergs323 2 years ago
Hey, Buergs323, like I said, the NIST has already concluded that thermite could not have severed key support columns of such size. With beams weighing several hundred tons and incredibly thick, thermite could not have completely severed it. Not only is it impossible to vertically sever beams of such size, linear thermite charges don't nearly have enough power or amount of thermite needed.
Maybe you should try to PROVE NIST wrong, rather than say they're lying without any evidence. Think plz.
McMcMeaty 2 years ago
Dude did you even bother to go to that website and find that peer reviewed article?? Or go to the video where NIST claims there was no eye witness accounts of molten metal and the next clip there are firemen and witnesses talking about molten metal? Dude these are independent scientists that are looking at the facts. Regardless of what you try to disprove about thermite; you never try to give an explanation as to why the molten metal was ever there.
Can you explain that plz?
Buergs323 2 years ago
You never gave me the article. Or at least, send it again.
Also, where does the NIST say there was no molten metal whatsoever. I want to make sure you aren't just pulling stuff out your ass.
McMcMeaty 2 years ago
Go to ae911truth(dot)org
Click on the video on the left side of home page...(the full video)
Then skip to 32:40ish time and you will see John Gross the lead engineer for the NIST investigation lie about molten metal being found..
Buergs323 2 years ago
The article:
Since I cannot post any links on youtube I'll do my best to direct you to it.
Visit ae911truth(dot)org
Slide your mouse over "Resources"
Click on "Techincal Articles"
Click on the second link: Active Thermitic Material Discovered....
9 Scientists and Physicists discuss 4 samples of thermite being found in dust...this article is no joke and this to me is a very legit argument for other people who question the official stories...
Buergs323 2 years ago
You're taking it out of context. The dude from NIST did not say there weren't molten pools of metal, he said he did not know of anyone who's seen it. The video then proceeds to show testimony from people I assume the guy has never met.
McMcMeaty 2 years ago
journalof911studiesDOTcom has many peer reviewed papers...so i guess this stuff im saying does matter...
Also, ae911truthDOTorg is another good site with peer reviewed papers...cmon man...this stuff matters lol
Buergs323 2 years ago
Scientifically peer reviewed papers regarding the collapse? Care to share with us one of them?
McMcMeaty 2 years ago
Dude you sound like a paid shill lol
Considering I cannot post any links I'll do my best to explain how to get to it...
Visit: ae911truth(dot)org
Move your mouse over the "Resources" link
Then scroll down to technical articles and click on that link.
You will then seen many articles...Click on Active Thermitic Materials discovered in dust etc.
This is a peer reviewed journal regarding thermite being found at GZ. (9 Professors or experts in chemistry or physics)
Wake the HELL UP
Buergs323 2 years ago
Guess what? There are only 3 peer-reviewed papers on that site, and none of them deal with issues that refute the NIST report. They merely present more questions, which the NIST promptly answered. The Active Thermite Materials journal was already explained by the fact that a lot of thermite was used in clean up immediately. Not to mention that the components of thermite are found in any building.
Please try better than simply shouting "shill" and "Wake up". You sound like a simpleton.
McMcMeaty 2 years ago
What about the video with Richard Gage?
Notice him lie?
Can you show me peer reviewed articles supporting NIST?
Do me a favor and read the article:
Page 2, they show the exact points and street addresses where the dust was picked up.
Look at #2, you are telling me they cut steel that far outside of GZ?
You seem to be blind. I was too. I tried saying the same thing you did.
However, with further research I switched, mainly bc of these articles and scientists that question the NIST report.
Buergs323 2 years ago
"The Active Thermite Materials journal was already explained by the fact that a lot of thermite was used in clean up immediately."
HAHAHAHA you are really reaching arent you. Really quite comical how you suggest that thermite was used in the clean up. Absolutely obsurd! You are the one that sounds like a simpleton with that comment.
NIST also admits that WTC7 fell at free fall, they didnt explain how because free fall speed is only possible when explosives/incendiaries are used.
F4O4U4R4S 2 years ago 2
Yes, it's totally far fetched to have clean up crews using thermite to cut through some metal bars for ease in cleanup.
It's a known fact that clean up crews used thermite to cut some of the metal bars to make for easier cleanup. Don't be ignorant, whoops, too late.
Also, NIST only said one stage of the three stage collapse sequence was in freefall speed. Freefall is a symptom of progressive collapse seeing as all supports failed during the process.
Educate yourself please.
McMcMeaty 2 years ago
what a pant load of crap you are spouting there.
F4O4U4R4S 2 years ago
Actually, there are only 3 peer reviewed papers. None of which counter anything in the NIST report. Try harder please.
McMcMeaty 2 years ago
Look up nano thermites too...educate
Buergs323 2 years ago
"Traces of thermite was only found because clean up crews used it to slice the small beams into smaller pieces for cleanup."
Whats your source??
Buergs323 2 years ago
I love it when they go straight down like that.
RainyLittleGhost 3 years ago
Some of these buildings that get demolished aren't event that old.
Make your minds up!
monkeybike 3 years ago
oh crap i left my car there
stephenharperbest2 3 years ago 4
That building was something of a landmark.
herrgolf 3 years ago
it looked like they tried to renovate it
1959cadillacelderato 3 years ago
AGAIN AGAIN!
TricseaWasNotHere 3 years ago 2
lol
nicolas555539 4 years ago
suicide bombers holding a summit meeting
WiLLisSOiLL 4 years ago 4
LOL.....NICE ONE!!
georgeoj44 4 years ago
lmaoo nicee
gousalondon2012 3 years ago
bye
Niyazz38 4 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
damn israeli's
bigDaddyHus 4 years ago
i love cdi implosions!
thomastankboys 5 years ago