If this Sigma 70-200 is the latest version with OS, it seems to be around the price of a used Nikon 70-200 VR (version I, not II). In that case, I think I would go for the Nikon.
Nikon D3100 14.2 Megapixel DX-format CMOS Image Sensor delivers beautiful photographs. 3-in. monitor with One-Touch Live View shooting and movie capture. Fast 11-point Autofocus System delivers razor-sharp pictures. 6 Automatic Exposure Scene Modes Just set the Mode dial to Portrait, Landscape, Child, Sports, Close-up or ...
For more details please copy the Amazon link below in your browser:
Like most people here, Nikon 70-200 is way too expensive for me. I'm still tossing between this Sigma and the Tamron. Can't wait to see your comparison. No pressure :)
I have the Sigma 70-200 (without the OS) and it's pretty nice. I love that it's built like a lead pipe, and it autofocuses super fast and smoothly. However, it tends to be a bit soft at f2.8 in some situations. I'd definitely recommend it over any kit lens, but sometimes I kinda wish I had saved a bit (a lot) more for the real-deal Nikon.
Sigma has stepped up few notches lately. I've also acquired Sigma’s 50mm 1.4 and the results from this prime are stunning. Looking now at Tokina 16-28 - very tempting.
Sigma has stepped up few notches lately. I've also acquired Sigma’s 50mm 1.4 and the results from this prime are stunning. Looking now at Tokina 16-28 - very tempting.
For me this was a choice merely made by the price of this lens, I know for a fact that the Canon MKII or the Nikon VRII will be the better lens, The question is if its 1000$ better for you. I cant justify the expense, so I went the Sigma way, just because apparently IMO the difference between the brand and the Sigma is close enough to make me save the money, At least that is my conclusion after looking at other reviews and comparisons , that is why Look forward to your review :-)
I have been using this lens for about six months now. Very happy with the results so far. Any quality gaps between the uber-expensive Nikon VR version and Sigma can be corrected in NIK Software.
I Just ordered one of these lens, very cool that you just happen to make this video, thanks, I am very excited to shoot with this lens soon, that is my upgrade to my old 70-200 f4L Non IS, I look forward to your full review
If this Sigma 70-200 is the latest version with OS, it seems to be around the price of a used Nikon 70-200 VR (version I, not II). In that case, I think I would go for the Nikon.
marike1100 2 days ago
God! I'd hate to be a camera shop owner nowadays.
usanineoneone 1 week ago
NEW DISCOUNT is.gd\g0LDfy
Product Description
Nikon Sigma OS
Nikon D3100 14.2 Megapixel DX-format CMOS Image Sensor delivers beautiful photographs. 3-in. monitor with One-Touch Live View shooting and movie capture. Fast 11-point Autofocus System delivers razor-sharp pictures. 6 Automatic Exposure Scene Modes Just set the Mode dial to Portrait, Landscape, Child, Sports, Close-up or ...
For more details please copy the Amazon link below in your browser:
is.gd\g0LDfy
CunninghamSammy8183 1 week ago
Matt, how smooth is the tripod ring? Do you think it can endure fast and lots of twisting? Without scratching the lens?
muusers 3 months ago
@muusers from memory is great. And scratching isn't an issue
thatnikonguy 3 months ago
Very usefull.. even for us Canon users :) Thanks.
muusers 4 months ago 2
@muusers cheers
thatnikonguy 4 months ago
This is also the HSM version also, might wanna put that in the title.
TehHelpStation 4 months ago
@TehHelpStation Sry, got 10secs in, and its not, didnt think they made a non HSM os version lol
TehHelpStation 4 months ago
@TehHelpStation cheers.
thatnikonguy 4 months ago
Looking forward to your comparison, good job.
boilerjack 4 months ago
@boilerjack thank you. Coming very soon (in a few parts)
thatnikonguy 4 months ago
Like most people here, Nikon 70-200 is way too expensive for me. I'm still tossing between this Sigma and the Tamron. Can't wait to see your comparison. No pressure :)
ranhma 4 months ago
@ranhma haha, thanks. Part one coming in the next few hours.
thatnikonguy 4 months ago
I have the Sigma 70-200 (without the OS) and it's pretty nice. I love that it's built like a lead pipe, and it autofocuses super fast and smoothly. However, it tends to be a bit soft at f2.8 in some situations. I'd definitely recommend it over any kit lens, but sometimes I kinda wish I had saved a bit (a lot) more for the real-deal Nikon.
sexualburgerking 4 months ago
could you lock the exposure of the camera when you do the video so that the video does not become dark or bright spontaneously. thanks
sayasangatgembira11 4 months ago
@sayasangatgembira11 thanks for the suggestion.
thatnikonguy 4 months ago
thanks matt, im hoping that i can buy this lens in future. thanks too for your past speedlight comparison,it helps alot. your the man.
Biemonday 4 months ago
@Biemonday thanks mate - comparison coming soon.
thatnikonguy 4 months ago
@Biemonday thanks mate - comparison coming soon.
thatnikonguy 4 months ago
nice videos ! ill wait for that nikonvstamarovssigma...
kabatbut 5 months ago
@kabatbut coming very soon.
thatnikonguy 4 months ago
What is written on your hand :P
MrKLMFokker 5 months ago
@MrKLMFokker was a to do list.
thatnikonguy 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
borism68: Good comment.
Sigma has stepped up few notches lately. I've also acquired Sigma’s 50mm 1.4 and the results from this prime are stunning. Looking now at Tokina 16-28 - very tempting.
Opatije 5 months ago
borism68: Good comment.
Sigma has stepped up few notches lately. I've also acquired Sigma’s 50mm 1.4 and the results from this prime are stunning. Looking now at Tokina 16-28 - very tempting.
Opatije 5 months ago
For me this was a choice merely made by the price of this lens, I know for a fact that the Canon MKII or the Nikon VRII will be the better lens, The question is if its 1000$ better for you. I cant justify the expense, so I went the Sigma way, just because apparently IMO the difference between the brand and the Sigma is close enough to make me save the money, At least that is my conclusion after looking at other reviews and comparisons , that is why Look forward to your review :-)
borism68 5 months ago
@borism68 coming soon!
thatnikonguy 4 months ago
I have been using this lens for about six months now. Very happy with the results so far. Any quality gaps between the uber-expensive Nikon VR version and Sigma can be corrected in NIK Software.
Opatije 5 months ago
@Opatije cool! My comparison coming soon.
thatnikonguy 4 months ago
I am very keen to find out how this compares to the Nikon equivalent. tossing up between the two, I really want the Nikon but its mega expensive..
chriscombe 5 months ago
@chriscombe review coming in next days.
thatnikonguy 4 months ago
I can't wait to see your side-by-side comparison. For Canon's 70-200mm f2.8 IS MK II, it's said to be much better than the Sigma equivalent version.
wilbertcs 5 months ago
@wilbertcs the canon is a whole nother level probley the best 70-200 out there
bwinn10 4 months ago
I Just ordered one of these lens, very cool that you just happen to make this video, thanks, I am very excited to shoot with this lens soon, that is my upgrade to my old 70-200 f4L Non IS, I look forward to your full review
borism68 5 months ago
@borism68 comparison coming very soon
thatnikonguy 4 months ago