He has alot of bad opinions, but alot of good ones too, not all white men are bad. Infact, almost no one is truly evil, its things that lead to corruption that lead to ignorance and hate.
@wufrudelu If only Malcolm had lived long enough to have his eyes open to the truth of Ahayah in the Spirit of Yahshayah that he is an Israelite and to learn our true biblical heritage and history and the reason for our condition as a people it would have been good. He used a lot of bible references particularly the account of the Children of Israel in Eygptian bondage, if he only knew that we are the descendants of those sent into the captivity of Eygpt a second time.
@wufrudelu He is saying a lot of stuff many of the Israelite Heritage Camps as saying. And surely I see now he was a forerunner. Maybe a John the Baptist in the spirit of Elijah who came to us and we heard him not...Now a generation later his people are awakening, and the seeds that did not fall by the wayside or stony ground where the birds of the air could pluck them up, they are fallen on good ground and what were mustards seeds of revelation are now sprouting with figs.
damn this dude is freakin intelligent and eliquent...and he will bust a cap in yo ass if u fkkk wit him mayne....i can listen to this dude all muffkkkin day long mayne
Malcolms anger is evident. Thats what seperated him from other public figures. To bad elijah muhammad was a hypocrite and broke Malcolms faith in him.
@jordan19822000 B4 going to Meccah he relied on Elijah M to give him the truth. On the pilgrimage he spoke to all color and creed of Islam (brothers). It's about peace, fairness, respect, love, etc.. This is also true of Christianity, Judiaism, etc. Why? Humans have forgotten that b4 religion there was only the acknowledgement/worship of God/Allah/Jehova/Yahweh as the creator and no other above Him or next to Him. Walk in his will and follow his steps/commandments/law.God's way is THE TRUTH
dleEast ALWAYS at war! Mohammad violent SINFUL Murderer! Jesus Healed/Blessed/ Peace/Salvation/GOD! All MUSLIMS who converted to Christianity ARE HAPPY/FREE OF ABUSE/MISERY! Your leaders are killing you! All Christians LOVE YOU! PLEASE accept JESUS CHRIST as your SAVIOR! John 3:16 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him! PLEASE REBEL/ACCEPT JESUS! Be FREE of ISLAM LIES! Visit wlix radio.com
@dafawkey. It's funny how the CIA admitted that LSD hit the streets on accident. Lol that's nothing but a cover up. And who were the first ones that used LSD on the streets? Black people.. That's kinda ironic
@dafawkey. Where do u think LSD came from? CIA. Plus I who was the white official that let cocaine back in our country? How do black people get guns and drugs? Lol the white man
@infox1000 No I did not miss your point. They did know opportunities existed, because there's always been drugs. and it would be their perfect opportunity to get hold of any type of drug if they can sell it. I'm not the one who's ignorant though, you are, so no. just because there were a few links to the CIA and drug dealers doesn't mean the CIA forced it on them in the first place. There are tons of other ways it could have started and one of them that's not proven is by the government.
@infox1000 They didn't create the demand because the gangs were already looking for opportunities of it. Drugs being in the ghetto being "fairly new" is the OPPOSITE of the point I'm making.
@infox1000 no you're desperately trying to prove something with a source that doesn't support what you even say.
you said it was forced into neighborhoods. It was supply and demand transactions like I said. Gangs in the neighborhoods already were looking for the opportunity. Making money with cocaine was an opportunity, not something forced. So no it wasn't relaly "Forced into neighborhoods" when the people from the neighborhoods are taking it in.
@infox1000 You're clearly confused, doesn't matter if I said he or they it's obvious what I'm talking about no matter what typos or grammar errors. Anyone can "claim" they were "used", they were still involved in doing it, they were not forced into anything. You also say "Tricked", but yet tricking someone isn't forcing something, because that is more of a passive thing, nothing forceful. You are just giving conspiracy theories, no facts.
@infox1000 there never was anyone to say they didn't want it, and the gangs there obviously used it so no there was no forcing. and yes you aren't using common knowledge, since nothing was forced. and no not really two different concepts, very much similar. nieghborhood can be seen as social not just a physical place. And no, common knowledge and facts without the need of sources is someone who already knows there's no debate about it, whether or not the other person wants a "source" or not.
@infox1000 umm no that's common knowledge, doesn't require a fact. I never made a claim, I simply rejected yours, for you are not proving it was forced because you are using a source that does not support that. "funneling drugs into poor neighborhoods" does not mean they were forced there at all. You're just making claims you can't back up. Force would require them to force them into shooting it into their veins. Simply "taking it into the neighborhood"(as you claim) isn't force.
@infox1000 The only denial and ignorance is coming from you. Your reference of Micahel Ruppert didn't prove your point at all. you said it was forced, when it wasn't. Your source did not side with your argument for you said that it was forced in neighborhoods, when it in fact was not. that lets me know how much you use wordplay.
Since integration black people have generally gotten dumber compared to those days, black business almost extinct, black media totally extinct, and black men seem to enjoy wearing dresses in front of cameras.
Maybe it wasn't an exploding power keg, but a slow burn still burning today.
There is NO SUCH THING as a black racist. It's impossible when you look at it from a logical point of view. Black people are not in control of anyone's lives to exert prejudice ideologies on anyone....
Sounds like that reverse racism & race card CRAP! Did black people invent Segregation/Jim crow? Did black people make laws to discriminate against whites? NO!
A bitter pill to swallow 4 you, but WHITES are the OFFICIAL Racists, simple & plain, i rest my case!
An easy way to smoke out the obvious lie of people like DaFawky is to look at one of the most famous drug dealers of the 90's.... Freeway Ricky Ross, NOT
the rapper who took his name, the REAL one. Look at his testimony and court reports and find out who put him in business in the 1st place....
Give you a hint: It's an agency abbreviated by 3 letters....
@whosaidthattteez85 I've ran circles around you already. No one just "put" them there. You admitted that gangs were going to get hold of the drugs. There was a demand, then there was a supply. You want to hide from the truth. If the tree is the truth, then it's falling on you hard, snake. :)
LOLOL The circles are in your small mind my sorry friend!
There's nothing to put there in your case, you spin not even half but quarter truths and totally omit all else,
if you WERE speaking truth of any kind, someone here would back up what you say, but again your people have been thoroughly brain-washed to make the biggest lies sound like god's honest truth.
And lastly the tree analogy represents ignorance, which you show to the 3rd degree, so we ALL see where that's falling..
As Albert Einstein said: "2 things are infinite: The universe and man's stupidity, and i'm not quite sure about the universe.."
This explains people like you to a tee, but as slow as you are on the uptake, i doubt you can even understand the meaning of such a quote, so let that swirl in your small brain for a moment. Think it
over for a few days... Now i need to get back to work, it was fun intellectually crushing you, been a
while since I've done that and it was pretty damn fun!
@whosaidthattteez85 No that explains people like you, not me. Now you're just projecting yourself. It probably took you a few weeks to even get what it means. I intellectually crushed you, now you're just keep projecting your stupidity. You're saying everything about yourself, and then inserting my name into it.
@infox1000 there was transaction between two parties. nothing was forced. It was a supply and demand transaction. no one's neighborhood was forced to do drugs.
The FBI and CIA flooded poor neighborhoods of color with that shit to put movements of people waking
up to sleep that Malcolm and Huey P set in motion. Co-Intel Pro is just the tip of the iceberg on this, look it up and you'll see.. But in about 30 years the drugs permeated out of the ghettos and all over the country...
So instead of a 'Black' Problem, it became an 'American' Problem, which in many ways America deserved for targeting only ghettos with it...
@whosaidthattteez85 Wrong. Stop the lies. Like I said, no one FORCED anything.
And exactly, you just proved my point. The gangs in poor neighborhoods are getting what they want. You just perfectly proved MY side of the argument. Supply and demand.
@infox1000 The outside forces get the orders FROM the drug dealers TO send the drugs over. definitely a choice. Nothing's forced, like I said.supply and demand.
@infox1000 You can make an unclear statement that looks like it's clear until you further explain what you're talking about. Not my fault on that part.
@infox1000 Doesn't matter, there was a transaction for it. No one "forced" anything, bottom line. Forcing would be taking a dump truck, literally pouring it into a neighborhood, and getting a bunch of troops to inject everyone with a bunch of drugs. that did not happen. Nothing was forced. Any drugs being taken into the area is being called upon by drug dealers.
@infox1000 The second part of your sentence did NOT make clear "the whole population", YOU PUT A COMMA which SEPARATED your sentence. It's not common sense to make an unclear statement, then blame the person who responds and say they made an unclear statement. You made it. So own up to it, get over it, and make yourself clearer next time. The second part of your sentence did not at all make your first part clearer.
@infox1000 No I'm not saying it's a lie that not all black people use drugs. That has absolutely nothing to do with it.
It was never forced on them. No one "forced" drugs into the area, that's ridicuous. You can't "force" drugs into a neighborhood.. Forcing would be taking a dump truck, going into a neighborhood, dumping it all on the ground, and making people smoke/inject it. That's not what anyone has done. no one "forced" any neighborhood to using drugs. Everything is brought by a demand.
@infox1000 WTF? It didn't MATTER if I left any part of the sentence. The second part of your sentence didn't explain further what you meant by "the whole population". It was irrelevant to my point, so I left that out. Your second part of your sentence was "yet the population of blacks..." which was a different statement. It never negated what I said. So own up to it. You were very unclear. be clearer next time. If you actually read what you said you would know that. Try to keep up.
@infox1000 There was a choice involved. It's not forced in any form whatsoever. Any drugs being carried there is being given by a demander. No one forced any drugs into someone. And it's not true anyway so that's irrelevant.
@infox1000 Yes, I DID say that's a lie. I said "It's a lie that [insert your quote here]". The burden of an unclear statement is on you in the first palce.
@infox1000 I didn't "do" anything. The "half" of what you said was a full statement. I'll quote the whole thing.
"And then the percentage of black people using drugs is less than the whole population, yet the population of black people in jail is more than half.
This never negated the fact that u made an unclear statement. You STOPPED at "less then the whole population", and then made ANOTHER statement with "YET, the population of blacks..."
So my point was still fully made. be clear next time.
@infox1000 The one I just copied and pasted!!! WTF? LOL
I dont think I ever actually gave a crap if u SAID it was a shocker, that was your implication as if a supply for a demand is something to be worth noting. All youve said is that theres a supply for the demand, & then blame the supplier but not the demander.
Actually I still don't agree that the CIA "pumping drugs" into ghettos. Even if gov. supplied it, "pumping it" would imply there's no choice involved, as if forcing it into ghettos.
@infox1000 Your statement was the first one that was unclear. you are the one that said via copy & and paste, "and the percentage of black people using drugs is less than the whole population". You can't judge my "unclear statement" when you're the one that made it. That doesn't even make sense. you're the one that made the statement. Try to make your statements more clear, you made them.
It did need to be given when you think it's a "shocker" that a supply is given for a demand.
@infox1000 yup, and that has nothing to do with saying "All black people use drugs". I said they do it more than the whole population. What you siad was a lie. Has nothing to do with "all black people use drugs".
I'm not "justifying" it. When one has a demand, there becomes a supply. Sorry but that's a fact of life. No "justification" in that, simply reality. If you are looking for drugs, someone's going to sell you drugs...okay....umm...and? your point? that's what happens in any transaction.
@infox1000g I never said all black people use drugs. Lol what an idiot. Strawman argument. Not one time did I EVER say "all black people use drugs". You either need reading comprehension classes, or you just need to go back to elementary school.
I never justified pumping drugs into poor neighborhoods. Another idiotic strawman.
@infox1000 I never blamed the slaves for being enslaved.. If the sellers ever became slaves it was AFTER they were the slave owners in the first place.. So no that excuse doesn't work.. Then they would be slaves AFTER the fact.
@infox1000 There is no "Race" thing about it, has nothing to even do with morre black people being there, it's just a poor neighborhood PERIOD. the government doesn't "pump it" there. What a ridiculous statement.
@infox1000 I'm giving an example percentage. Don't be dumb. My point was that the percentage of white drug buyers would be LESS than their actual population percentage, while the number of black buyers would be more than their population percentage. I wouldn't be surprised if it was 70% because most of the transactions come from black people. I've lived in both types of neighborhoods so it's very obvious.
@infox1000 I never backtracked. YOU misinterpreted MY statement. I put "larger" in QUOTES, I said they MIGHT have played a quote unquote "larger" role, and only because a buyer will keep the slave for a lifetime while a seller keeps a slave for a short amount of time. That doesn't change the fact that they played a VERY large role.
@infox1000 They barely make up 10% of the population yet make about 30% of the buyers. White people make up 75% of the population and the percent of white drug buyers is less than 75% of the buyer population.
@infox1000 I didn't "Admit" it. there was no "confession". The only reason they played a "larger" role is that the ones who sold the slaves only had them for a SMALL amount of time, while the BUYERS had them for the rest of their lives. So no, I never "admitted" anything. you're still wrong. Blacks still played a MAJOR role in it regardless.
@infox1000 They did do that so that example fits perfectly. Like I said before, it's like locking people up in a boat and shipping them off to never-land and when they get sent to Antarctica and freeze you just say "oh not my fault". If you didn't check out the rights for people in that certain country before selling them than something was wrong with you as a "seller" in the first place.
@infox1000 yeah and the ones who live in the richer areas came FROM poor areas, for making a living with it in the poor areas in the first place. More white people don't use drugs more than black people so I don't know where you're getting that from since it's blacks who use it a lot more. The system isn't set up against blacks.
@infox1000 They might have played a "larger" role but selling them in the first place is a large role in itself, no matter how much you sugar coat it.
I'm not blaming slaves for being enslaved, I'm blaming the ones who SOLD them. Both black and white parties took their part in the transactions and there's nothing that can take that away.
@infox1000 Youre gasping at straws. Selling anyone isn't treating someone like a human being.
"They had no idea what the white slavers were going to do". Excuses. That's like taking a group of people and putting them inside a boat with no way out, and pushing the boat into some unknown place an thinking "hey, don't know where they're going, but not my fault!" ...if the sellers had no idea what their rights were going to be, then theyre a bad seller, like I said before and will continue to say.
@infox1000 There always rich.. by coming out the poor neighborhood.. that's the whole point why people in poor neighborhoods have more drug transactions taking place, because that's their living.
@infox1000 The fact that black people even sold them in the first place is FAR enough to say that black people played a major part of it. Doesn't matter if it's from a different tribe or not that doesn't make it right.
@infox1000 Like I said before, if you don't know that your slave(which you are selling) may be taken to an entirely different country, with different human rights laws, and could possibly be treated terribly, then that would make you a "terrible seller" in the first place.
That's like sending a group of people to Antarctica and then thinking "hmm, well I don't know what will happen to them, but it's not my fault!!!"
@infox1000 No matter how much you downplay or sugar coat it, there's no pretty way to say it. they were very much consciously involved in the slave trade, period.
@infox1000 If you sell a SLAVE to someone and don't expect that they may treat the slave terribly in an entire different country, with no rights to their name, there's something wrong with the seller in the first place. So no it was never as simply as "blacks being the raped and whites being the rapist", no matter how much you want it to be. Both parties were involved in selling slaves period. "blaming them for what white people did to them". Correction: What white AND black people did to them.
@infox1000 "All they did was sell" again, what a disgusting comment. only makes you look even more foolish and cruel at the same time, and not only that but downplaying it. Most transactions were from black sellers who had ALL conscious intent of getting profits and selling them out. Both parties took part in helping the slave trade regardless if a few whites stole slaves. People steal things all the time, that doesnt mean there was never a conscious intent of selling them in the first place.
@infox1000 No, they don't harass majority of poor black neighborhoods. There aren't less drugs in those areas, so that's illogical. There is no conspiracy about "going after black poor neighborhoods" it's about "poor neighborhoods" PERIOD, where more drug transactions take place. It's not "because you're black", that's stupid.
@infox1000 Black people have done beatings and killings since the beginning of time. They've never been perfect tribes that did no wrong. And that's the thing, it was never as simple as white people being the oppresses and black people being the oppressed. Both blacks and whites had conscious involvement in the slave trade. Calling them "only a seller" is just disgusting & shouldn't even deserve a response. Even if they did oppress and enslave its not BECAUSE they "hate you for being black".
@infox1000 You just keep downplaying it more and more. "What? All they did was sell them. I mean hey because thee's absolutely nothing wrong with that"... There were black people were just as cruel. And as I said before there were a few whites who took them by force but most transactions were black sellers of slaves who played a big role in the slave trading.
@infox1000 There are a few upper class predominently-black neighborhoods in California that get the same exact treatment as predominently-white upper class neighborhoods, so race is not an issue whatsoever. I live in a predominently black neighborhood and it happens all the time. My cousin's upper-class neighborhood never has problems because they don't even use drugs as much.
@infox1000 Your whole argument is about downplaying it. "They were only sellers"? You REALLY can't find where you're downplaying it? Disgusting.
And that's the thing, blacks being racist isn't "just being prejudice", it's being racist, no matter how much you sugar coat it. If you want to say it's "just prejudism" then it's "just prejudism" for whites. No special treatment, if you're being racist you're being racist, simple as that.
@infox1000 "only sellers". wow, thats just disgusting. No point in arguing because you'll downplay it anyway. Doesn't matter they still have involvement in it regardless if whites took some by force or not, most transactions came from blacks who wanted to sell them anyway.
@infox1000 Drugs were impacting lower class neighborhoods, it's not because you're black, it's because you're in a lower class neighborhood. Anyone can be from a lower class neighborhood. It's only really a war on drugs on lower class areas because that's were most drug transactions take place. They never checked middle and upper class areas, even the predominantly-black upper class neighborhoods In California.
@infox1000 Like I said they were high class and possibly high-middle class, but nothing lower than that whatsoever, since most whites didn't even have slaves.
"All black people did was sell the slaves" - Downplaying on the highest degree, even after ASKING how you're downplaying it. Wow, just wow.
Anyone who does or says anything inherently racist is a racist, doesn't matter if they're oppressed or not. It's not about being oppressed by "White people" for it's not "because your black."
@infox1000 The system isn't set up against black people because you have every right to get education and a job and get OUT of the lower class, so once again the system ISN'T set up against black people. The war on drugs was only a war when more and more people started getting killed. Has nothing to do with upper class people. They send surveillance in poor and drug-infested neighborhoods in general, no race thing about it. that's simply where more drug deals occur.
@infox1000 And regardless if the took some of them by force, they were still wanting to sell them in the *FIRST* place, in which many slaves were actually done through selling, so what's your point?
@infox1000 But middles class whites didn't have slaves.... unless they weren't relaly middle class, and they were actually high-middle class with a lot of money. Most whites in general didn't have slaves, so that would include the middle class.
You downplay black involvment in the slave trade. you keep sugar coating black racists with "prejudice"(which isn't going to work no matter how much you keep saying it). I've already explained. Just read it again.
@infox1000 White people are the majority of the population, so therefore if you base your "white people commit more crimes" based on "70% of murderers are white" that is simply illogical, and yo umight have to take a class in statistics. So yes, more blacks commit crimes.
Just because more blacks commit crimes doesn't mean the system is set up against black people, it means black people set themself up against the system.
@infox1000 "more white poeple commit crimes in america" That's false. We don't commit more crimes, we commit less crimes.
THERE IS NO OPPRESSION of black people here, you are the one who doesn't understand that. It's all every man for himself these days. No matter HOW MUCH you sugar coat it, ANY racism from blacks WILL ALWAYS be racism, NOT just being "prejudice".
@infox1000 "white washed history" seems to exclude Irish ENSLAVEMENT(not the indentured servants). So no it's not just white washed it also downplays discrimination of whites in history books.
Whites were NOT the ones who started it, they had to get blacks to sell it to them first. So no, you had your share whether you like it or not. Not all white people went along with it either. Another failed logic.
@infox1000 Nope, whites get discriminated here too. I know a white guy (who was qualified) whos job was given up to a black guy with no credentials or experience, then he was terrible at the job. This is a common thing. So no u dont have any less discrimination. Every man for himself these days.
Nono "prejudice" it is simply "racism", NO SUGAR coating.. ONLY racist. If you call it prejudice then a white person's "racism" is also just "prejdudice".Dont sugar coat your racism. They arent oppessed.
@infox1000 "Try reading some real history isn't of repeating white washed history." Not all white people have the same view of history, plus given the fact that everything I said wasn't "white washed" but was just facts of histoy being poured out without any political correctness.
You sue can make general statements, you've been doing the same as me.
"Whites were way morer involved"- generalizing whites. You're just syaing the same thing I'm saying but saying it's bad for me to "generalize".
@infox1000 You generalize history way too much. Only rich whites had slaves, and many white countries didn't even have black slaves. So you're just generalizing "white involvement", when by using YOUR logic, white people aren't grouped as one and come from different countries and cultures. You're just being hypocritical in everything you say and will do anything to downplay black involvement.
@infox1000 Black people are get just as many rights here as whites do, so you're a liar. A black person being racist is NOT just a repsonce to white supremacy, it's called just "being racist". No excuses. The better term for that is not prejudice, it's RACIST, NO SUGAR COATING.
@infox1000 You're the one who grouped all white people as one anyway, so you're being hypocritical.
It's BLACK people killing other BLACK rivals. You're just using an EXCUSE by saying "their from different tribes". That doesn't change the fact that they are all black.
No, YOU'RE using an excuse to downplay BLACK INVOLVEMENT in the slave trade. You're blatantly lying and your projection is NOT working.
@infox1000 "their own" is black people. Common sense. We are not talking about nationalities, we're talking the race of just whites and blacks in general. I don't care about the different tribes and cultures, black people still sold OTHER black people TO the whites. My point is still made, you want to excuse it by saying they were from "different tribes".
It doesnt matter if they were from different tribes. They sold other black people AS slaves TO white people, no matter how you sugar coat it.
@infox1000 Actually they did sell their own, that's a fact- there's no "debate" about it.
That's NOT like saying "the germans bombed their own for bombing britain", that's like saying "white people bombed their own" (which they did, just like blacks sold their own to the whites). You made a failed analogy and confused race with nationality. Try some history yourself (instead of afro-centrist propaganda) because both blacks and whites did terrible things whether you may like it or not.
I really don't give a shit to read 4 useless comments, if you think the internet is that serious then maybe it's not for you. If you can't talk logical to a barbarian than why am I talking to you, a barbarian. Blacks are the ones who throw "ignorant hate" all over the place. You need a taste of your own medicine. Stop projecting yourself.
I really don't give a shit to read 4 comments, if you think the internet is that serious than maybe it's not for you.
If you can't talk logical to a barbian than why am I even here, talking TO a barbarian?
"It's an epic fail how white ppl think they can throw their ignorant hate all over the place".
Switch "White people" with "black people" and it will make sense. No, you're misinformed, you are getting a taste of YOUR own medicine. Stop projecting yourself.
Add to that africans was rumbling to save their own from them scumbag whites and sellout africans, among them at the forefront was a WOMAN Queen Nzingha. Google her name and see how that strong black women dealt with those scum, most of the FBI & CIA strategies stem from that woman's brilliance...
Don't think you, a white person, can sit here and tell me the history of my people, it doesn't work and
you look stupid. And if white ppl 'don't give a shit', WTF are you doing here??
If-- & i emphasize IF the black man is a violent hypocritical racist as you say, it comes from being in contact with pink primates who look just like you. After all, when you colonize and rob ppl of a knowledge of self they on the characteristics of their oppressor..
Whites came to Africa cutting the hands off children, now they do it to each other. They did amateur c-sections on pregnant women and smashed the fetus' head on rocks, now they do it.
That's all white people have ever done on earth, his whole history is in those 10 seconds of dialogue. Maybe a bitter pill for you out there to swallow, but it is what it is....
Also using the UN to support your "source" just SEVERELY made you even LESS credible(despite using flawed "world" classifications to support your argument, which made you not credible in the first place). Most Second world countries are no better than third world countries because they are equally in bad conditions, therefore your logic is severely flawed. The only basis you have is emotiion/victimization.
@DaFawky Your are wrong. You have backed up nothing, I named sources you haven't. And I'm right about there being no counrties doing worst than africa. But your are right about me being victimized, it's been that way all my life, what your doing is confirming that. Your in denial about the plight of Africans and Blacks in this current era.
@jaronnewyork No, "Your are wrong", not me. Sorry you have problems with projection.
You named uncredible sources(LOL @ UN), and classifying countries by "Worlds" doesn't make one country "better" than another, moron.
No, you are victimizing yourself. I know I'm right, thank you. You justvictimize yourself to make it seem like people are "oppressing" you when you're not. Yes, I AM confirming that. THANK you for admitting it!
@SithLordNefaar022 Yes actually I have, it was the other person who was just bringing OPINIONS, not facts.
He is a racist. He made racist comments. That's a fact. The REAL racists tend to be black. White people simply DONT GIVE A SHIT!!!
But I get YOUR denial though. Blacks tend to bury their head in the sand, and pretend they were never slave owners, and pretend they never sold their OWN PEOPLE out to the whites.
It's in your nature after all, no surprise there. Hypocrisy at it's finest.
Well let's thin slice that for a moment, Why did those Africans 'sell their own' to whites?
Because whites coaxed them into it. First was gold for guns, but then those whites said we want those
strong Africans as slaves, so out of hubris, those Africans went along with it in addition, they didn't wanna be kidnapped themselves. One will always sell out the other to save himself, Jews rounded up other Jews to the Death camps to save themselves, but you wouldn't know that, huh?
But in my personal case, i suppose i AM violent, a SITH tends to be that way, hence the name...
As Malcolm himself said, you can't talk logical to a barbarian, so i'm speaking in your language and you obviously understand it now. It's an epic fail how white ppl think they can throw their ignorant hate all over the place, but when you give them a taste of their own medicine, they plead sheer ignorance and act shocked that their own venom comes back to do them in..
@SithLordNefaar022 I really don't give a shit to read 4 comments, if you think the internet is that serious than maybe it's not for you.
If you can't talk logical to a barbian than why am I even here, talking TO a barbarian?
"It's an epic fail how white ppl think they can throw their ignorant hate all over the place".
Switch "White people" with "black people" and it will make sense. No, you're misinformed, you are getting a taste of YOUR own medicine. Stop projecting yourself.
@SithLordNefaar022 I really don't give a shit to read 4 comments, if you think the internet is that serious than maybe it's not for you.
If you can't talk logical to a barbian than why am I even here, talking TO a barbarian?
"It's an epic fail how white ppl think they can throw their ignorant hate all over the place".
Switch "White people" with "black people" and it will make sense. No, you're misinformed, you are getting a taste of YOUR own medicine. Stop projecting yourself.
Ethiopia could have a few rich people but would still be just as bad as it was before, if not worse.Even nigeria has good education. There are some parts of Romania that are nothing BUT third world. You just generalize each country.
Normally when a country is "second world" that's a hint to you that there are many THIRD world communities in that country with the exception of the rich controlling it.
@DaFawky Why bring up the slave trade? Besides, the white men chose to buy them, I pretty sure they weren't forced to. What about that greed called imperialism? Thats more heavy than a slave trade is it not?
@jaronnewyork I didn't SAY they didn't choose to buy them did I? Nope. I'm saying both Africans AND whites were responsible. That's a fact. The whites wouldn't really have slaves if it wasn't for your own people selling out. So blacks too are responsible. ALL races have done imperialism. Africa has had history of imperialism for thousands of years.. Stop blaming whites for everything. Stop victimizing yourself, sheesh..
@DowesBeeEyeSee Who the hell are you? I wasn't talking to you, but everybody's to blame for something, it just so happens that white folks are to blame for most problems of the human condition. Deal with it, and wake up!
@jaronnewyork sry, my sis' account. And no it's NOT just whites that are to blame for most problems, that's a lie people like you keep trying to keep trying to portray. A lot of it is also black people's fault too and that's something you should deal with. Stop victimizing yourself an trying to blame everything on whites it's so sickening!
@DaFawky no problem. It's not a lie, in the state of human affairs there are victims and victimizers, and i dont see no white third world countries. You won't see it from my point of view, especially if your white. White folks behave like they know whats best for all. You might believe that yourself.
@jaronnewyork Russia, Romania, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Moldova, Belarus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Macedonia, Serbia, Slovenia, and Estonia are not developed countries. It's mostly western and northern Europe but everything east of it are developing countries. It's not even developing it's more like third world in some countries, eg. a lot of Russia is underdeveloped. only a "nice" place if you're rich and ignore all the starving people on the street
@DaFawky Sorry my friend those are all classified as second world countries, Russia has a space program and spy's for goodness sakes what are you thinking?
@jaronnewyork sorry but no in some areas they definitely are third world, depends on where in the country. if you're one of the few rich people, then yes russia is a "nice" place. but no, it's definitely a shit country. That's why there are so many prostitutes and mail order brides.
@DaFawky Well I tried to show you the truth but if your going to dispute the FACTS using your opinion there's no helping you right now. Maybe later in life you'll face the truth about the world we share. But you really should look into the meaning of third world country, because i researched it to benefit both of us.
@jaronnewyork Thats NOT fact. Russia is the largest country in the world. If u go to Moscow thats the best place to live and that makes up for a lot of Russias problems. The fact is a lot of Russia is pure crap, tons of girls being forced into prostitution,people with little to eat. The only reason why it's considered "developing" is because of the rich controlling everything and education is good. Tons of homeless kids wondering streets, they literally have to watch out for pedophiles..
@DaFawky yeah see your becoming emotion and letting it blind your logic. Russia is not a third world country, Prostitution is a bad thing, having little to eat is also bad, however these things don't classify Russia as being a third world country. Do your research and then I'll be glad to continue our conversation.
@jaronnewyork Ahh, no, you are in fact very incorrect, I actually have no emotion behind it as I don't even care about russians, I'm just stating FACT. Your victimization and blaming whites is blinding your logic. Do your research first instead of generalizing a country based on a few rich controlling it. Second world is just a euphemism of "rich people first, everyone else third". Using a flawed system of classifying countries is a poor attempt on your part..
@YummyMoonPies I found only two regions identified as third world; Belarus and Chechnya. "Third world" is part of that euphemism as well, so how could you sit there say whats a third world country or not, you think the system is flawed. The fact still remains that white folks seek to use, conquer or, destroy every places they visit.
@jaronnewyork Again, flawed classifications of other countries do no good for your standpoint. A 2nd world country is pretty much "the few rich people is first world, everyone else is third world", and in the end it's just as shitty of a country as a "third world" country.
@DaFawky I don't know where you get your facts from but since you have failed to back up anything you say with facts, my stand point remains more truthfully then what you believe. What do you think, that white folks are the saviors? the chosen people or something? And look at what you just said "the few rich people is the first world" rich people don't qualify as a country. Further more, i got my info from nationsonline as well as The UN so spare me your beleifs of the facts.
@jaronnewyork No, u failed to back anything up with facts. Your standpoint isnt truthful, you might keep telling yourself that but in the end it's not.
Did I SAY that rich people quali\fy as a country? NOPE. I said that when a COUNTRY is "2nd world", almost ALWAYS it will mean the few rich people are living first world while everyone elsei n the country gets 3rd world conditions. So no, that doesn't mean it's a "better" country for being classidied "2nd world". LOL @ the UN. Those AREN'T facts.
@DaFawky Well where do you get your info from? oh what you travel to all these places and do field studies, i doubt that. You have nothing to support your argument. It's like i said before, it's all emotional for you.
@jaronnewyork Ah thats where yur wrong, cuz u are the one whos basing your argument on emotions(blaming whites/victimizing). u also use flawed classifications("1st2nd3rd world") of countries to say there aren't countries as bad as African countries, which is false. Just cuz a country is 2nd world doesn't mean it's "better". Most "second world" countries have few rich living in good conditions and the rest in bad "third world" conditions, so u are therefore wrong to use such classifications.
@DaFawky I don't know where you get your facts from but since you have failed to back up anything you say with facts, my stand point remains more truthfully then what you believe. What do you think, that white folks are the saviors? the chosen people or something? And look at what you just said "the few rich people is the first world" rich people don't qualify as a country. Further more, i got my info from nationsonline as well as The UN so spare me your beliefs of the facts.
X had it right all along. Look at the state of the African Americans today, especially in light of the economic recession. The ship is sinking and the African Americans are on the bottom of it with high unemployment, crime and poor education.
But no worries, the rising third world will give a home to the oppressed and white nationalism will fade into the pages of history...
"When Negros stop faunicating and committing adultery" , so kinda like MLK?? MAlcom X was true and true, all the way through, he was a man that lived what he preached and preached what he lived.. MLK was made by the white man for the white man (ps, i am a white man) .. we need more men of all colors to be as honest and truthful as X
We need a worldwide revolutiuon - that will remove these demonic people - who are intent on sending us all to hell fire. May Allah give us strength to remove them.
@rastaR00STER Then prove it! Call these bad ones out1
lilcoco770007 2 weeks ago in playlist THE COMPLETE MALCOLM X
of course, Mr. Muhammed was fornicating more than Tiger Woods!
chuckbaker 2 weeks ago
He has alot of bad opinions, but alot of good ones too, not all white men are bad. Infact, almost no one is truly evil, its things that lead to corruption that lead to ignorance and hate.
rastaR00STER 3 weeks ago
Malcolm X = perfection in mind
monptii 5 months ago 7
he's saying stuff noam chomsky is still saying
wufrudelu 6 months ago in playlist THE COMPLETE MALCOLM X SPEECHES 7
@wufrudelu If only Malcolm had lived long enough to have his eyes open to the truth of Ahayah in the Spirit of Yahshayah that he is an Israelite and to learn our true biblical heritage and history and the reason for our condition as a people it would have been good. He used a lot of bible references particularly the account of the Children of Israel in Eygptian bondage, if he only knew that we are the descendants of those sent into the captivity of Eygpt a second time.
IHBenRonYisrayl12 1 month ago
@wufrudelu He is saying a lot of stuff many of the Israelite Heritage Camps as saying. And surely I see now he was a forerunner. Maybe a John the Baptist in the spirit of Elijah who came to us and we heard him not...Now a generation later his people are awakening, and the seeds that did not fall by the wayside or stony ground where the birds of the air could pluck them up, they are fallen on good ground and what were mustards seeds of revelation are now sprouting with figs.
IHBenRonYisrayl12 1 month ago
ENGLAND BLACK MEN AND BLACK WOMEN ARE FINALLY AWAKENING FROM THEIR LONG SLEEP OF RACIAL MAGINALIZATION BY THE WHITE ENGLISHMAN. 1950- 2011
andylumeh 6 months ago
ENGLAND BLACK MEN AND BLACK WOMEN ARE FINALLY AWAKENING FROM THEIR LONG SLEEP OF RACIAL MAGINALIZATION. 1950- 2011
andylumeh 6 months ago 2
damn this dude is freakin intelligent and eliquent...and he will bust a cap in yo ass if u fkkk wit him mayne....i can listen to this dude all muffkkkin day long mayne
MUZIKLUVA420 6 months ago 2
MALCOLM X IS THE GREATEST. He wasnt angry the crackers was, he just was tired of it.
SuperCortez17 8 months ago in playlist THE COMPLETE MALCOLM X SPEECHES
Malcolms anger is evident. Thats what seperated him from other public figures. To bad elijah muhammad was a hypocrite and broke Malcolms faith in him.
jordan19822000 8 months ago
@jordan19822000 B4 going to Meccah he relied on Elijah M to give him the truth. On the pilgrimage he spoke to all color and creed of Islam (brothers). It's about peace, fairness, respect, love, etc.. This is also true of Christianity, Judiaism, etc. Why? Humans have forgotten that b4 religion there was only the acknowledgement/worship of God/Allah/Jehova/Yahweh as the creator and no other above Him or next to Him. Walk in his will and follow his steps/commandments/law.God's way is THE TRUTH
Jgchris1981 6 months ago in playlist THE COMPLETE MALCOLM X SPEECHES
you dont intergrate with a sinking ship.....he said it
tommybrown187 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dleEast ALWAYS at war! Mohammad violent SINFUL Murderer! Jesus Healed/Blessed/ Peace/Salvation/GOD! All MUSLIMS who converted to Christianity ARE HAPPY/FREE OF ABUSE/MISERY! Your leaders are killing you! All Christians LOVE YOU! PLEASE accept JESUS CHRIST as your SAVIOR! John 3:16 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him! PLEASE REBEL/ACCEPT JESUS! Be FREE of ISLAM LIES! Visit wlix radio.com
tigersforchrist 10 months ago
To beeeeee...
johndorm 10 months ago
Wow! is it true Malcolm x dropped out of middle school. He is so obviously smart. I seriously thought he went to college.
jesusvilla07 11 months ago
@jesusvilla07 Intelligence and higher education are mutually exclusive
mlmr11 9 months ago
@dafawkey. It's funny how the CIA admitted that LSD hit the streets on accident. Lol that's nothing but a cover up. And who were the first ones that used LSD on the streets? Black people.. That's kinda ironic
TheMasterflash01 11 months ago
@dafawkey. Where do u think LSD came from? CIA. Plus I who was the white official that let cocaine back in our country? How do black people get guns and drugs? Lol the white man
TheMasterflash01 11 months ago
It's a shame someone's experiences can lead to these opinions.
LucaBoulders 11 months ago
@infox1000 No I did not miss your point. They did know opportunities existed, because there's always been drugs. and it would be their perfect opportunity to get hold of any type of drug if they can sell it. I'm not the one who's ignorant though, you are, so no. just because there were a few links to the CIA and drug dealers doesn't mean the CIA forced it on them in the first place. There are tons of other ways it could have started and one of them that's not proven is by the government.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 They didn't create the demand because the gangs were already looking for opportunities of it. Drugs being in the ghetto being "fairly new" is the OPPOSITE of the point I'm making.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 no you're desperately trying to prove something with a source that doesn't support what you even say.
you said it was forced into neighborhoods. It was supply and demand transactions like I said. Gangs in the neighborhoods already were looking for the opportunity. Making money with cocaine was an opportunity, not something forced. So no it wasn't relaly "Forced into neighborhoods" when the people from the neighborhoods are taking it in.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 You're clearly confused, doesn't matter if I said he or they it's obvious what I'm talking about no matter what typos or grammar errors. Anyone can "claim" they were "used", they were still involved in doing it, they were not forced into anything. You also say "Tricked", but yet tricking someone isn't forcing something, because that is more of a passive thing, nothing forceful. You are just giving conspiracy theories, no facts.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 no he wasn't.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 There was a connection between them and the CIA but nothing says they were so-called "forced" into it.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 there never was anyone to say they didn't want it, and the gangs there obviously used it so no there was no forcing. and yes you aren't using common knowledge, since nothing was forced. and no not really two different concepts, very much similar. nieghborhood can be seen as social not just a physical place. And no, common knowledge and facts without the need of sources is someone who already knows there's no debate about it, whether or not the other person wants a "source" or not.
DaFawky 1 year ago
common knowledge and facts and refuting a source that doesn't even support your position, don't require a source.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 umm no that's common knowledge, doesn't require a fact. I never made a claim, I simply rejected yours, for you are not proving it was forced because you are using a source that does not support that. "funneling drugs into poor neighborhoods" does not mean they were forced there at all. You're just making claims you can't back up. Force would require them to force them into shooting it into their veins. Simply "taking it into the neighborhood"(as you claim) isn't force.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 The only denial and ignorance is coming from you. Your reference of Micahel Ruppert didn't prove your point at all. you said it was forced, when it wasn't. Your source did not side with your argument for you said that it was forced in neighborhoods, when it in fact was not. that lets me know how much you use wordplay.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 You never backed up your claims, you're just giving your opinions in the first place. The burden of proof lies on you not me.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 I already backed them up but I see you're being ignorant so no use in that.
DaFawky 1 year ago
Since integration black people have generally gotten dumber compared to those days, black business almost extinct, black media totally extinct, and black men seem to enjoy wearing dresses in front of cameras.
Maybe it wasn't an exploding power keg, but a slow burn still burning today.
lionzion22 1 year ago
And for the LAST time...
There is NO SUCH THING as a black racist. It's impossible when you look at it from a logical point of view. Black people are not in control of anyone's lives to exert prejudice ideologies on anyone....
Sounds like that reverse racism & race card CRAP! Did black people invent Segregation/Jim crow? Did black people make laws to discriminate against whites? NO!
A bitter pill to swallow 4 you, but WHITES are the OFFICIAL Racists, simple & plain, i rest my case!
whosaidthattteez85 1 year ago
@infox1000
As far as this fawky character goes: "Don't argue with a tree, that tree will fall on you."
=)
whosaidthattteez85 1 year ago
An easy way to smoke out the obvious lie of people like DaFawky is to look at one of the most famous drug dealers of the 90's.... Freeway Ricky Ross, NOT
the rapper who took his name, the REAL one. Look at his testimony and court reports and find out who put him in business in the 1st place....
Give you a hint: It's an agency abbreviated by 3 letters....
whosaidthattteez85 1 year ago
@whosaidthattteez85 I've never been shut down, because I'm right. And you keep proving I'm right. The supply comes from a demand.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky
The proof is that whites putting the drugs in those neighborhoods is the supply in the 1st place. Did
black people ask to have drugs brought into their neighborhoods? Were they asking for the supply?
NO. And obviously without supply there is no demand. Whites create the supply, which leads to the
demand. Stop the tongue-twisting, you're getting circles run around you...
But as i said, you believe whatever you want to believe, the truth cuts like a knife dipped in STD blood...
whosaidthattteez85 1 year ago
@whosaidthattteez85 I've ran circles around you already. No one just "put" them there. You admitted that gangs were going to get hold of the drugs. There was a demand, then there was a supply. You want to hide from the truth. If the tree is the truth, then it's falling on you hard, snake. :)
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky
LOLOL The circles are in your small mind my sorry friend!
There's nothing to put there in your case, you spin not even half but quarter truths and totally omit all else,
if you WERE speaking truth of any kind, someone here would back up what you say, but again your people have been thoroughly brain-washed to make the biggest lies sound like god's honest truth.
And lastly the tree analogy represents ignorance, which you show to the 3rd degree, so we ALL see where that's falling..
whosaidthattteez85 1 year ago
@whosaidthattteez85 no, you're just blind.
You wish it was forced in your neighborhoods, but that's not even 1/10 a truth.
The tree represents truth more than ignorance. And that's the only thing of mine falling on you.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky
As Albert Einstein said: "2 things are infinite: The universe and man's stupidity, and i'm not quite sure about the universe.."
This explains people like you to a tee, but as slow as you are on the uptake, i doubt you can even understand the meaning of such a quote, so let that swirl in your small brain for a moment. Think it
over for a few days... Now i need to get back to work, it was fun intellectually crushing you, been a
while since I've done that and it was pretty damn fun!
whosaidthattteez85 1 year ago
Comment removed
DaFawky 1 year ago
@whosaidthattteez85 No that explains people like you, not me. Now you're just projecting yourself. It probably took you a few weeks to even get what it means. I intellectually crushed you, now you're just keep projecting your stupidity. You're saying everything about yourself, and then inserting my name into it.
You're owned. Peace :)
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 there was transaction between two parties. nothing was forced. It was a supply and demand transaction. no one's neighborhood was forced to do drugs.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky
WRONG!
The FBI and CIA flooded poor neighborhoods of color with that shit to put movements of people waking
up to sleep that Malcolm and Huey P set in motion. Co-Intel Pro is just the tip of the iceberg on this, look it up and you'll see.. But in about 30 years the drugs permeated out of the ghettos and all over the country...
So instead of a 'Black' Problem, it became an 'American' Problem, which in many ways America deserved for targeting only ghettos with it...
STOP THE LIES!
whosaidthattteez85 1 year ago
@whosaidthattteez85 Wrong. Stop the lies. Like I said, no one FORCED anything.
And exactly, you just proved my point. The gangs in poor neighborhoods are getting what they want. You just perfectly proved MY side of the argument. Supply and demand.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky
And you just proved my point about who puts the drugs in these areas in the 1st place. You'd
probably say the same thing when the Brits waged not one but TWO wars with China all for the
sake of flooding their country with opium, would you call THAT supply & demand as well?
You're not a bad tongue twister, a regrettable habit whites tend to have, but i've been encountered
it more times than i care to recall, so I know just how to deal with it. You've been shut down yet again...
whosaidthattteez85 1 year ago
@DaFawky
You'll resort to ANYTHING to make it seem like whites in power have nothing to do with the situation,
but the facts are obvious & overwhelming. As said, look up co-intel pro and research who put Ricky
Ross in business to begin with if you have the capability, and you'll see everything i've said is true....
Argue against it all you want until your walnut-sized brain pops if you wish, it doesn't change the
TRUTH. But people like you were born with a natural immunity to the truth..
whosaidthattteez85 1 year ago
@DaFawky
I can give you videos and send you links of reports detailing those agencies parking trucks
filled to the hilt with drugs and guns in the worst ghettos ie: Harlem, compton, englewood, etc
and just leave them there for the gangs to acquire and disperse through the neighborhood..
Think about the lies/crap you're saying here, it's pathetic....
In any rate, i have a business to run, no need to argue with fools, it's counter-productive to
the 3rd degree... BTW WASSUP ANTI-HOSTILE!!!
whosaidthattteez85 1 year ago
@infox1000 The outside forces get the orders FROM the drug dealers TO send the drugs over. definitely a choice. Nothing's forced, like I said.supply and demand.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky
I've said all i need to say. Crawl back to whatever snake pit you crawled from and don't
respond to me anymore. Light breaks the darkness !!!!
whosaidthattteez85 1 year ago
@infox1000 Outisde forces brought the drugs there FROM inside forces(drug dealers). So it is a choice. Nothing was forced.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 You can make an unclear statement that looks like it's clear until you further explain what you're talking about. Not my fault on that part.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 Doesn't matter, there was a transaction for it. No one "forced" anything, bottom line. Forcing would be taking a dump truck, literally pouring it into a neighborhood, and getting a bunch of troops to inject everyone with a bunch of drugs. that did not happen. Nothing was forced. Any drugs being taken into the area is being called upon by drug dealers.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 The second part of your sentence did NOT make clear "the whole population", YOU PUT A COMMA which SEPARATED your sentence. It's not common sense to make an unclear statement, then blame the person who responds and say they made an unclear statement. You made it. So own up to it, get over it, and make yourself clearer next time. The second part of your sentence did not at all make your first part clearer.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 No I'm not saying it's a lie that not all black people use drugs. That has absolutely nothing to do with it.
It was never forced on them. No one "forced" drugs into the area, that's ridicuous. You can't "force" drugs into a neighborhood.. Forcing would be taking a dump truck, going into a neighborhood, dumping it all on the ground, and making people smoke/inject it. That's not what anyone has done. no one "forced" any neighborhood to using drugs. Everything is brought by a demand.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 WTF? It didn't MATTER if I left any part of the sentence. The second part of your sentence didn't explain further what you meant by "the whole population". It was irrelevant to my point, so I left that out. Your second part of your sentence was "yet the population of blacks..." which was a different statement. It never negated what I said. So own up to it. You were very unclear. be clearer next time. If you actually read what you said you would know that. Try to keep up.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 There was a choice involved. It's not forced in any form whatsoever. Any drugs being carried there is being given by a demander. No one forced any drugs into someone. And it's not true anyway so that's irrelevant.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 Yes, I DID say that's a lie. I said "It's a lie that [insert your quote here]". The burden of an unclear statement is on you in the first palce.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 I didn't "do" anything. The "half" of what you said was a full statement. I'll quote the whole thing.
"And then the percentage of black people using drugs is less than the whole population, yet the population of black people in jail is more than half.
This never negated the fact that u made an unclear statement. You STOPPED at "less then the whole population", and then made ANOTHER statement with "YET, the population of blacks..."
So my point was still fully made. be clear next time.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 The one I just copied and pasted!!! WTF? LOL
I dont think I ever actually gave a crap if u SAID it was a shocker, that was your implication as if a supply for a demand is something to be worth noting. All youve said is that theres a supply for the demand, & then blame the supplier but not the demander.
Actually I still don't agree that the CIA "pumping drugs" into ghettos. Even if gov. supplied it, "pumping it" would imply there's no choice involved, as if forcing it into ghettos.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 Your statement was the first one that was unclear. you are the one that said via copy & and paste, "and the percentage of black people using drugs is less than the whole population". You can't judge my "unclear statement" when you're the one that made it. That doesn't even make sense. you're the one that made the statement. Try to make your statements more clear, you made them.
It did need to be given when you think it's a "shocker" that a supply is given for a demand.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 yup, and that has nothing to do with saying "All black people use drugs". I said they do it more than the whole population. What you siad was a lie. Has nothing to do with "all black people use drugs".
I'm not "justifying" it. When one has a demand, there becomes a supply. Sorry but that's a fact of life. No "justification" in that, simply reality. If you are looking for drugs, someone's going to sell you drugs...okay....umm...and? your point? that's what happens in any transaction.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000g I never said all black people use drugs. Lol what an idiot. Strawman argument. Not one time did I EVER say "all black people use drugs". You either need reading comprehension classes, or you just need to go back to elementary school.
I never justified pumping drugs into poor neighborhoods. Another idiotic strawman.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 After the fact that they were the SELLERS. They still played a major role in it regardless of the sugar coating.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 "and the percentage of black people using rugs is less than the whole population" that's a lie.
No one "pumps drugs" into your neighborhoods "because you're black". No one cares.
If anyone "pumps drugs" its because the poor neighborhoods are more likely to use drugs and want drugs, not because they're being forced into it...
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 I never blamed the slaves for being enslaved.. If the sellers ever became slaves it was AFTER they were the slave owners in the first place.. So no that excuse doesn't work.. Then they would be slaves AFTER the fact.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 There is no "Race" thing about it, has nothing to even do with morre black people being there, it's just a poor neighborhood PERIOD. the government doesn't "pump it" there. What a ridiculous statement.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 I'm giving an example percentage. Don't be dumb. My point was that the percentage of white drug buyers would be LESS than their actual population percentage, while the number of black buyers would be more than their population percentage. I wouldn't be surprised if it was 70% because most of the transactions come from black people. I've lived in both types of neighborhoods so it's very obvious.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 I never backtracked. YOU misinterpreted MY statement. I put "larger" in QUOTES, I said they MIGHT have played a quote unquote "larger" role, and only because a buyer will keep the slave for a lifetime while a seller keeps a slave for a short amount of time. That doesn't change the fact that they played a VERY large role.
DaFawky 1 year ago
the simple fact is there's no "race" thing about the government checking on poor neighborhoods.
They don't check on rich upper class neighborhoods, whether they be white *OR* black. So no, there's no race thing about it.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 They barely make up 10% of the population yet make about 30% of the buyers. White people make up 75% of the population and the percent of white drug buyers is less than 75% of the buyer population.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 I didn't "Admit" it. there was no "confession". The only reason they played a "larger" role is that the ones who sold the slaves only had them for a SMALL amount of time, while the BUYERS had them for the rest of their lives. So no, I never "admitted" anything. you're still wrong. Blacks still played a MAJOR role in it regardless.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 They did do that so that example fits perfectly. Like I said before, it's like locking people up in a boat and shipping them off to never-land and when they get sent to Antarctica and freeze you just say "oh not my fault". If you didn't check out the rights for people in that certain country before selling them than something was wrong with you as a "seller" in the first place.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 yeah and the ones who live in the richer areas came FROM poor areas, for making a living with it in the poor areas in the first place. More white people don't use drugs more than black people so I don't know where you're getting that from since it's blacks who use it a lot more. The system isn't set up against blacks.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 They might have played a "larger" role but selling them in the first place is a large role in itself, no matter how much you sugar coat it.
I'm not blaming slaves for being enslaved, I'm blaming the ones who SOLD them. Both black and white parties took their part in the transactions and there's nothing that can take that away.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 Youre gasping at straws. Selling anyone isn't treating someone like a human being.
"They had no idea what the white slavers were going to do". Excuses. That's like taking a group of people and putting them inside a boat with no way out, and pushing the boat into some unknown place an thinking "hey, don't know where they're going, but not my fault!" ...if the sellers had no idea what their rights were going to be, then theyre a bad seller, like I said before and will continue to say.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 There always rich.. by coming out the poor neighborhood.. that's the whole point why people in poor neighborhoods have more drug transactions taking place, because that's their living.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 The fact that black people even sold them in the first place is FAR enough to say that black people played a major part of it. Doesn't matter if it's from a different tribe or not that doesn't make it right.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 A lie on your part yes. Being poor has a direct correlation with selling drugs (or doing whatever kind of crime) in order to survive.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 Like I said before, if you don't know that your slave(which you are selling) may be taken to an entirely different country, with different human rights laws, and could possibly be treated terribly, then that would make you a "terrible seller" in the first place.
That's like sending a group of people to Antarctica and then thinking "hmm, well I don't know what will happen to them, but it's not my fault!!!"
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 No matter how much you downplay or sugar coat it, there's no pretty way to say it. they were very much consciously involved in the slave trade, period.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 being poor has a direct correlation with more crime including drug trafficking in order to make a living.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 If you sell a SLAVE to someone and don't expect that they may treat the slave terribly in an entire different country, with no rights to their name, there's something wrong with the seller in the first place. So no it was never as simply as "blacks being the raped and whites being the rapist", no matter how much you want it to be. Both parties were involved in selling slaves period. "blaming them for what white people did to them". Correction: What white AND black people did to them.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 "All they did was sell" again, what a disgusting comment. only makes you look even more foolish and cruel at the same time, and not only that but downplaying it. Most transactions were from black sellers who had ALL conscious intent of getting profits and selling them out. Both parties took part in helping the slave trade regardless if a few whites stole slaves. People steal things all the time, that doesnt mean there was never a conscious intent of selling them in the first place.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 No, they don't harass majority of poor black neighborhoods. There aren't less drugs in those areas, so that's illogical. There is no conspiracy about "going after black poor neighborhoods" it's about "poor neighborhoods" PERIOD, where more drug transactions take place. It's not "because you're black", that's stupid.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 Black people have done beatings and killings since the beginning of time. They've never been perfect tribes that did no wrong. And that's the thing, it was never as simple as white people being the oppresses and black people being the oppressed. Both blacks and whites had conscious involvement in the slave trade. Calling them "only a seller" is just disgusting & shouldn't even deserve a response. Even if they did oppress and enslave its not BECAUSE they "hate you for being black".
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 You just keep downplaying it more and more. "What? All they did was sell them. I mean hey because thee's absolutely nothing wrong with that"... There were black people were just as cruel. And as I said before there were a few whites who took them by force but most transactions were black sellers of slaves who played a big role in the slave trading.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 There are a few upper class predominently-black neighborhoods in California that get the same exact treatment as predominently-white upper class neighborhoods, so race is not an issue whatsoever. I live in a predominently black neighborhood and it happens all the time. My cousin's upper-class neighborhood never has problems because they don't even use drugs as much.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 Your whole argument is about downplaying it. "They were only sellers"? You REALLY can't find where you're downplaying it? Disgusting.
And that's the thing, blacks being racist isn't "just being prejudice", it's being racist, no matter how much you sugar coat it. If you want to say it's "just prejudism" then it's "just prejudism" for whites. No special treatment, if you're being racist you're being racist, simple as that.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 "only sellers". wow, thats just disgusting. No point in arguing because you'll downplay it anyway. Doesn't matter they still have involvement in it regardless if whites took some by force or not, most transactions came from blacks who wanted to sell them anyway.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 Drugs were impacting lower class neighborhoods, it's not because you're black, it's because you're in a lower class neighborhood. Anyone can be from a lower class neighborhood. It's only really a war on drugs on lower class areas because that's were most drug transactions take place. They never checked middle and upper class areas, even the predominantly-black upper class neighborhoods In California.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 And my point is it doesn't matter because there were black sellers wanting to sell them out anyway REGARDLESS.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 Like I said they were high class and possibly high-middle class, but nothing lower than that whatsoever, since most whites didn't even have slaves.
"All black people did was sell the slaves" - Downplaying on the highest degree, even after ASKING how you're downplaying it. Wow, just wow.
Anyone who does or says anything inherently racist is a racist, doesn't matter if they're oppressed or not. It's not about being oppressed by "White people" for it's not "because your black."
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 The system isn't set up against black people because you have every right to get education and a job and get OUT of the lower class, so once again the system ISN'T set up against black people. The war on drugs was only a war when more and more people started getting killed. Has nothing to do with upper class people. They send surveillance in poor and drug-infested neighborhoods in general, no race thing about it. that's simply where more drug deals occur.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 And regardless if the took some of them by force, they were still wanting to sell them in the *FIRST* place, in which many slaves were actually done through selling, so what's your point?
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 But middles class whites didn't have slaves.... unless they weren't relaly middle class, and they were actually high-middle class with a lot of money. Most whites in general didn't have slaves, so that would include the middle class.
You downplay black involvment in the slave trade. you keep sugar coating black racists with "prejudice"(which isn't going to work no matter how much you keep saying it). I've already explained. Just read it again.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 White people are the majority of the population, so therefore if you base your "white people commit more crimes" based on "70% of murderers are white" that is simply illogical, and yo umight have to take a class in statistics. So yes, more blacks commit crimes.
Just because more blacks commit crimes doesn't mean the system is set up against black people, it means black people set themself up against the system.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 No black people to sell them, no black slave trade. (because it's a trade) It's that simple.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 If it was middle class whites then it was only a few, because most whites in general didn't even have slaves.- unless they were rich.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 You still are downplaying it. Try reading my arguments before commenting.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 "more white poeple commit crimes in america" That's false. We don't commit more crimes, we commit less crimes.
THERE IS NO OPPRESSION of black people here, you are the one who doesn't understand that. It's all every man for himself these days. No matter HOW MUCH you sugar coat it, ANY racism from blacks WILL ALWAYS be racism, NOT just being "prejudice".
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 "white washed history" seems to exclude Irish ENSLAVEMENT(not the indentured servants). So no it's not just white washed it also downplays discrimination of whites in history books.
Whites were NOT the ones who started it, they had to get blacks to sell it to them first. So no, you had your share whether you like it or not. Not all white people went along with it either. Another failed logic.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 Nope it was the richer whites. Most didn't have slaves at all.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 "besides not all tribes sold black slaves to white slavers"
NOT ALL WHITE COUNTRIES BOUGHT BLACK SLAVES! Same logic. you're still black. You still had involvement in the slave trade. No sugar coating it. :)
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 Nope, whites get discriminated here too. I know a white guy (who was qualified) whos job was given up to a black guy with no credentials or experience, then he was terrible at the job. This is a common thing. So no u dont have any less discrimination. Every man for himself these days.
Nono "prejudice" it is simply "racism", NO SUGAR coating.. ONLY racist. If you call it prejudice then a white person's "racism" is also just "prejdudice".Dont sugar coat your racism. They arent oppessed.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 "Try reading some real history isn't of repeating white washed history." Not all white people have the same view of history, plus given the fact that everything I said wasn't "white washed" but was just facts of histoy being poured out without any political correctness.
You sue can make general statements, you've been doing the same as me.
"Whites were way morer involved"- generalizing whites. You're just syaing the same thing I'm saying but saying it's bad for me to "generalize".
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 You generalize history way too much. Only rich whites had slaves, and many white countries didn't even have black slaves. So you're just generalizing "white involvement", when by using YOUR logic, white people aren't grouped as one and come from different countries and cultures. You're just being hypocritical in everything you say and will do anything to downplay black involvement.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 Black people are get just as many rights here as whites do, so you're a liar. A black person being racist is NOT just a repsonce to white supremacy, it's called just "being racist". No excuses. The better term for that is not prejudice, it's RACIST, NO SUGAR COATING.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 You're the one who grouped all white people as one anyway, so you're being hypocritical.
It's BLACK people killing other BLACK rivals. You're just using an EXCUSE by saying "their from different tribes". That doesn't change the fact that they are all black.
No, YOU'RE using an excuse to downplay BLACK INVOLVEMENT in the slave trade. You're blatantly lying and your projection is NOT working.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 "their own" is black people. Common sense. We are not talking about nationalities, we're talking the race of just whites and blacks in general. I don't care about the different tribes and cultures, black people still sold OTHER black people TO the whites. My point is still made, you want to excuse it by saying they were from "different tribes".
It doesnt matter if they were from different tribes. They sold other black people AS slaves TO white people, no matter how you sugar coat it.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 "A black person can't be racist" - 100% false.
"oppressed can't oppress the opperessor" - black people aren't oppressed so that's another false statement.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@infox1000 Actually they did sell their own, that's a fact- there's no "debate" about it.
That's NOT like saying "the germans bombed their own for bombing britain", that's like saying "white people bombed their own" (which they did, just like blacks sold their own to the whites). You made a failed analogy and confused race with nationality. Try some history yourself (instead of afro-centrist propaganda) because both blacks and whites did terrible things whether you may like it or not.
DaFawky 1 year ago
I really don't give a shit to read 4 useless comments, if you think the internet is that serious then maybe it's not for you. If you can't talk logical to a barbarian than why am I talking to you, a barbarian. Blacks are the ones who throw "ignorant hate" all over the place. You need a taste of your own medicine. Stop projecting yourself.
DaFawky 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I really don't give a shit to read 4 comments, if you think the internet is that serious than maybe it's not for you.
If you can't talk logical to a barbian than why am I even here, talking TO a barbarian?
"It's an epic fail how white ppl think they can throw their ignorant hate all over the place".
Switch "White people" with "black people" and it will make sense. No, you're misinformed, you are getting a taste of YOUR own medicine. Stop projecting yourself.
DaFawky 1 year ago
Sucks to be you, you're black.
and lol @ "sith". What are you from Star Wars?
DaFawky 1 year ago
It's in your nature to be violent and hypocritical, but since you're black, I can understand why you can't help yourself.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky
Add to that africans was rumbling to save their own from them scumbag whites and sellout africans, among them at the forefront was a WOMAN Queen Nzingha. Google her name and see how that strong black women dealt with those scum, most of the FBI & CIA strategies stem from that woman's brilliance...
Don't think you, a white person, can sit here and tell me the history of my people, it doesn't work and
you look stupid. And if white ppl 'don't give a shit', WTF are you doing here??
SithLordNefaar022 1 year ago
@DaFawky
If-- & i emphasize IF the black man is a violent hypocritical racist as you say, it comes from being in contact with pink primates who look just like you. After all, when you colonize and rob ppl of a knowledge of self they on the characteristics of their oppressor..
Whites came to Africa cutting the hands off children, now they do it to each other. They did amateur c-sections on pregnant women and smashed the fetus' head on rocks, now they do it.
So who's the REAL violent scum?
SithLordNefaar022 1 year ago
1:00 - 1:10
That's all white people have ever done on earth, his whole history is in those 10 seconds of dialogue. Maybe a bitter pill for you out there to swallow, but it is what it is....
SithLordNefaar022 1 year ago
Also using the UN to support your "source" just SEVERELY made you even LESS credible(despite using flawed "world" classifications to support your argument, which made you not credible in the first place). Most Second world countries are no better than third world countries because they are equally in bad conditions, therefore your logic is severely flawed. The only basis you have is emotiion/victimization.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky Your are wrong. You have backed up nothing, I named sources you haven't. And I'm right about there being no counrties doing worst than africa. But your are right about me being victimized, it's been that way all my life, what your doing is confirming that. Your in denial about the plight of Africans and Blacks in this current era.
jaronnewyork 1 year ago
@jaronnewyork No, "Your are wrong", not me. Sorry you have problems with projection.
You named uncredible sources(LOL @ UN), and classifying countries by "Worlds" doesn't make one country "better" than another, moron.
No, you are victimizing yourself. I know I'm right, thank you. You justvictimize yourself to make it seem like people are "oppressing" you when you're not. Yes, I AM confirming that. THANK you for admitting it!
LMAO WHAT plight of Blacks in this era? Dream on.
DaFawky 1 year ago
Have YOU brought any facts to this talk?
None that i see, just simply comment of opinionated drivel after opinionated drivel, lemme guess you
probably think Malcolm is some hateful racist because he calls the REAL racists out on their bullshit
right?? I get your denial though, i really do, white people choose to bury their heads in the sand, which
is a large reason why America's in the mess it's in now......
It's in your nature after all, no surprise there..... Quite redundant, in fact..
SithLordNefaar022 1 year ago
@SithLordNefaar022 Yes actually I have, it was the other person who was just bringing OPINIONS, not facts.
He is a racist. He made racist comments. That's a fact. The REAL racists tend to be black. White people simply DONT GIVE A SHIT!!!
But I get YOUR denial though. Blacks tend to bury their head in the sand, and pretend they were never slave owners, and pretend they never sold their OWN PEOPLE out to the whites.
It's in your nature after all, no surprise there. Hypocrisy at it's finest.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky
Well let's thin slice that for a moment, Why did those Africans 'sell their own' to whites?
Because whites coaxed them into it. First was gold for guns, but then those whites said we want those
strong Africans as slaves, so out of hubris, those Africans went along with it in addition, they didn't wanna be kidnapped themselves. One will always sell out the other to save himself, Jews rounded up other Jews to the Death camps to save themselves, but you wouldn't know that, huh?
SithLordNefaar022 1 year ago
@DaFawky
But in my personal case, i suppose i AM violent, a SITH tends to be that way, hence the name...
As Malcolm himself said, you can't talk logical to a barbarian, so i'm speaking in your language and you obviously understand it now. It's an epic fail how white ppl think they can throw their ignorant hate all over the place, but when you give them a taste of their own medicine, they plead sheer ignorance and act shocked that their own venom comes back to do them in..
SUX 2 BE YOU!
SithLordNefaar022 1 year ago
@SithLordNefaar022 I really don't give a shit to read 4 comments, if you think the internet is that serious than maybe it's not for you.
If you can't talk logical to a barbian than why am I even here, talking TO a barbarian?
"It's an epic fail how white ppl think they can throw their ignorant hate all over the place".
Switch "White people" with "black people" and it will make sense. No, you're misinformed, you are getting a taste of YOUR own medicine. Stop projecting yourself.
DaFawky 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SithLordNefaar022 I really don't give a shit to read 4 comments, if you think the internet is that serious than maybe it's not for you.
If you can't talk logical to a barbian than why am I even here, talking TO a barbarian?
"It's an epic fail how white ppl think they can throw their ignorant hate all over the place".
Switch "White people" with "black people" and it will make sense. No, you're misinformed, you are getting a taste of YOUR own medicine. Stop projecting yourself.
DaFawky 1 year ago
May Allah bless him and raise him as a martyr on the day of Judgement.
hamnahiman 1 year ago
Ethiopia could have a few rich people but would still be just as bad as it was before, if not worse.Even nigeria has good education. There are some parts of Romania that are nothing BUT third world. You just generalize each country.
Normally when a country is "second world" that's a hint to you that there are many THIRD world communities in that country with the exception of the rich controlling it.
DaFawky 1 year ago
Why else would you think most prostitutes and mail order brides come from Russia and Ukraine.. common sense now..
DaFawky 1 year ago
"the white man never acts brotherly" ...except how your own people sold you out to the whites. He's not "too real" he's "too biased".
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky Why bring up the slave trade? Besides, the white men chose to buy them, I pretty sure they weren't forced to. What about that greed called imperialism? Thats more heavy than a slave trade is it not?
jaronnewyork 1 year ago
@jaronnewyork I didn't SAY they didn't choose to buy them did I? Nope. I'm saying both Africans AND whites were responsible. That's a fact. The whites wouldn't really have slaves if it wasn't for your own people selling out. So blacks too are responsible. ALL races have done imperialism. Africa has had history of imperialism for thousands of years.. Stop blaming whites for everything. Stop victimizing yourself, sheesh..
DowesBeeEyeSee 1 year ago
@DowesBeeEyeSee Who the hell are you? I wasn't talking to you, but everybody's to blame for something, it just so happens that white folks are to blame for most problems of the human condition. Deal with it, and wake up!
jaronnewyork 1 year ago
@jaronnewyork sry, my sis' account. And no it's NOT just whites that are to blame for most problems, that's a lie people like you keep trying to keep trying to portray. A lot of it is also black people's fault too and that's something you should deal with. Stop victimizing yourself an trying to blame everything on whites it's so sickening!
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky no problem. It's not a lie, in the state of human affairs there are victims and victimizers, and i dont see no white third world countries. You won't see it from my point of view, especially if your white. White folks behave like they know whats best for all. You might believe that yourself.
jaronnewyork 1 year ago
@jaronnewyork It is a lie and many of European countries(mostly Eastern Europe) have been third world and/or are still developing countries.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky Oh yeah ? Name some, and i mean in the present day.
jaronnewyork 1 year ago
@jaronnewyork Russia, Romania, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Moldova, Belarus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Macedonia, Serbia, Slovenia, and Estonia are not developed countries. It's mostly western and northern Europe but everything east of it are developing countries. It's not even developing it's more like third world in some countries, eg. a lot of Russia is underdeveloped. only a "nice" place if you're rich and ignore all the starving people on the street
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky Sorry my friend those are all classified as second world countries, Russia has a space program and spy's for goodness sakes what are you thinking?
jaronnewyork 1 year ago
@jaronnewyork sorry but no in some areas they definitely are third world, depends on where in the country. if you're one of the few rich people, then yes russia is a "nice" place. but no, it's definitely a shit country. That's why there are so many prostitutes and mail order brides.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky Well I tried to show you the truth but if your going to dispute the FACTS using your opinion there's no helping you right now. Maybe later in life you'll face the truth about the world we share. But you really should look into the meaning of third world country, because i researched it to benefit both of us.
jaronnewyork 1 year ago
@jaronnewyork Thats NOT fact. Russia is the largest country in the world. If u go to Moscow thats the best place to live and that makes up for a lot of Russias problems. The fact is a lot of Russia is pure crap, tons of girls being forced into prostitution,people with little to eat. The only reason why it's considered "developing" is because of the rich controlling everything and education is good. Tons of homeless kids wondering streets, they literally have to watch out for pedophiles..
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky yeah see your becoming emotion and letting it blind your logic. Russia is not a third world country, Prostitution is a bad thing, having little to eat is also bad, however these things don't classify Russia as being a third world country. Do your research and then I'll be glad to continue our conversation.
jaronnewyork 1 year ago
@jaronnewyork Ahh, no, you are in fact very incorrect, I actually have no emotion behind it as I don't even care about russians, I'm just stating FACT. Your victimization and blaming whites is blinding your logic. Do your research first instead of generalizing a country based on a few rich controlling it. Second world is just a euphemism of "rich people first, everyone else third". Using a flawed system of classifying countries is a poor attempt on your part..
YummyMoonPies 1 year ago
@YummyMoonPies I found only two regions identified as third world; Belarus and Chechnya. "Third world" is part of that euphemism as well, so how could you sit there say whats a third world country or not, you think the system is flawed. The fact still remains that white folks seek to use, conquer or, destroy every places they visit.
jaronnewyork 1 year ago
@jaronnewyork Again, flawed classifications of other countries do no good for your standpoint. A 2nd world country is pretty much "the few rich people is first world, everyone else is third world", and in the end it's just as shitty of a country as a "third world" country.
And that's not a fact, so you are incorrect.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky I don't know where you get your facts from but since you have failed to back up anything you say with facts, my stand point remains more truthfully then what you believe. What do you think, that white folks are the saviors? the chosen people or something? And look at what you just said "the few rich people is the first world" rich people don't qualify as a country. Further more, i got my info from nationsonline as well as The UN so spare me your beleifs of the facts.
jaronnewyork 1 year ago
@jaronnewyork No, u failed to back anything up with facts. Your standpoint isnt truthful, you might keep telling yourself that but in the end it's not.
Did I SAY that rich people quali\fy as a country? NOPE. I said that when a COUNTRY is "2nd world", almost ALWAYS it will mean the few rich people are living first world while everyone elsei n the country gets 3rd world conditions. So no, that doesn't mean it's a "better" country for being classidied "2nd world". LOL @ the UN. Those AREN'T facts.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky Well where do you get your info from? oh what you travel to all these places and do field studies, i doubt that. You have nothing to support your argument. It's like i said before, it's all emotional for you.
jaronnewyork 1 year ago
@jaronnewyork Ah thats where yur wrong, cuz u are the one whos basing your argument on emotions(blaming whites/victimizing). u also use flawed classifications("1st2nd3rd world") of countries to say there aren't countries as bad as African countries, which is false. Just cuz a country is 2nd world doesn't mean it's "better". Most "second world" countries have few rich living in good conditions and the rest in bad "third world" conditions, so u are therefore wrong to use such classifications.
DaFawky 1 year ago
@DaFawky I don't know where you get your facts from but since you have failed to back up anything you say with facts, my stand point remains more truthfully then what you believe. What do you think, that white folks are the saviors? the chosen people or something? And look at what you just said "the few rich people is the first world" rich people don't qualify as a country. Further more, i got my info from nationsonline as well as The UN so spare me your beliefs of the facts.
jaronnewyork 1 year ago
X had it right all along. Look at the state of the African Americans today, especially in light of the economic recession. The ship is sinking and the African Americans are on the bottom of it with high unemployment, crime and poor education.
But no worries, the rising third world will give a home to the oppressed and white nationalism will fade into the pages of history...
Adnowwwwn 1 year ago
MALCOLM WAS TOOOOO REAL!!!! and abt cause and change that's why he had to leave this world....he was to good for this corrupted earth!!
The GOOD die YOUNG!!,this world will never change its evils it belongs to the devil (or as oldskool malcolm would say - the white man).
GurlCaa 1 year ago
"When Negros stop faunicating and committing adultery" , so kinda like MLK?? MAlcom X was true and true, all the way through, he was a man that lived what he preached and preached what he lived.. MLK was made by the white man for the white man (ps, i am a white man) .. we need more men of all colors to be as honest and truthful as X
DRMTHTR2112 1 year ago 3
We need a worldwide revolutiuon - that will remove these demonic people - who are intent on sending us all to hell fire. May Allah give us strength to remove them.
mallcolmx 1 year ago