Added: 4 years ago
From: jeroenverhoeven
Views: 21,921
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (55)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 0:26 vielle caisse

    0:33 derriere le toyota, une mercedes break

    0:38 vieille caisse encore

    0:42 vieux break merco derriere la jeep "sanctionnée"

    0:54 revoila la vieille opel

    1:12 vieille merco rouge

    1:15 vieille peugeot

    1:29 a droite du pick-up harcelé par la foule, une mercedes cls

    1:33 mini garée, version sport évidente due à sa prise d'air sur le capot...

    CONCLUSION : toutes les voitures sitées sont aussi polluantes que vos "4x4" (terme n'ayant aucun rapport avec les émmision de CO2)

  • Rtl The best :D

  • Je vois pas l'utilité des 4x4 en ville .. à part se montrer .. surtout à Paris, ces conducteurs vous méprisent et ne font attention à rien, il y a 3 espèces de conducteurs 4*4: La blondasse, au téléphone avec lunettes de soleil qui conduit comme un pied, le beauf friqué qui veut se montrer, et enfin le mec qui en a vraiment besoin ...

    Mais en ville > inutile. Et je vous dis pas la personalité de certains, genre porche cayen coupe la route et c'est son conducteur qui geule x_x...

  • mdr , ces gens la on que sa a foutre d'emmerder le monde , il ferait mieu de se les frotter dans le cul leur cartons rouge...

  • La vérité sort de la bouche des enfants ? Qui sait ? Au moins, il ne faut pas être un savant pour savoir qu'ils sont sortient du cul de leurs pute de mères.

  • Qu'es ce que vous aimé dans un 4x4 ? - Car j'aime le 4x4 !!!

    A moi de poser une question, pourquoi vous ne sonctionnént pas les voiture de luxe ?

    J'ai bien envie de voir avec quoi vous rouler bonde de con !!!

    Moi si je passer à ce moment là, je serrais descendu de mon nissan patrol gr long 3.0L, et je t'aurai pris le carton rouge et je l'aurai mis dans ta bouche !!

    Et j'ai un 4x4 pour faire chier les gens !

  • @42Benoit

    Genre moi j'ai çà, attention, je te méprise, j'ai un 4*4 ??

    Et en ville je suis désolé mais c'est inutile, et puis j'ai remarqué que beaucoup de ces conducteurs sont des ... bref

    Un 4*4 , au départ c'est pour le tout terrain mais des indivdus préfèrent se la péter en ville avec des modèles haut de gamme..ca va beauf nouveaux riches aux loulou de banlieue ou encore des milieux chics , point comun, j'ai une grosse ciasse, je suis supérieur à toi ;méprisable

  • C'est toi qui pue.

  • bande d'idiot puerile c'est pas des manif a la con qui va nous empécher de rouler en 4x4 maintenant que j'ai troqué ma 205 contre un hilux je ne peut plus revenir en arrier et j'emerde tous ce qui pouron dir le contraire .

  • "Une dizaine de militants" : ou comment 10 emmerdeurs polluent la vie et les oreilles de gens qui ne leur ont rien demandé. Médiocres militants staliniens.

  • if i were drivin by i would jab my middle finger right at them. they're fuckin love the earth panzis

  • i don't speak german...

    XD!!

  • RE: i don't speak german...

    Actually its French...

  • it really makes u wonder why the western world is bothering when meanwhile places like china are just fucking it up 100 times worse everyday and do fuck all to stop it

  • If you say China, you say 1/6th of the world population. These 1.300.000.000. people of China emit about the same amount of CO2 as the US population which is more than 4 times smaller. I don't know what you think, but I think that the worst thing the Chinese population could do is to act like the population in the western world is acting right now.

    How about the people in the western world getting their act together and giving another example to the chinese population?

  • hey - maybe communism is the way of the future after all

  • Your remarks seems devoid from any serious reflection on the subject. Communism has a productivist vision on society, which it has in common with Capitalism. It is productuvism which got us into trouble in the first place.

    Are you aware that a free society is based on people taking up their personal responsability to taking care of their environment? Driving around in climate killing cars is NOT taking responsability.

  • yeh, well i can ride a bike without no hands

  • I think you are starting to get it. DO drive your bike indeed.

    I say better drive your bike without no hands than driving an SUV without NO BRAINS.

  • HAHA! Perfect reply! tu la cassé! Terrible! greetings from Berlin!

  • THE ARE BELG

  • Ignorant wankers. Yeah, I can really see the logic in this. They are bad because their transmission systems can transmit drive to all 4 wheels.

  • No idiot, it's because they weigh 3+ tonnes, get 10 mpg, spew pollution, while the idiots driving them have absolutely no legitimate need for their off road/towing capability. You gonna go cross-country in bumper-to-bumper 20 kph gridlock in your morning commute? Need all that swinish size to protect you from a dirty look while stuck in traffic. Willingly enslaved fool...

    So how do you like paying 1.15 Pounds/litre for petrol? That's helped along nicely by these arse-wagons, too.

  • At what point did I say that I was supporting chintzy 4x4's? Yeah, I know that Chelsea tractors, like the BMW X5, shouldn't be on the road, as all they do is fail off-road and extend the penis, but take a look at any old Land Rover from the 60's or any other 4x4 of a similar vintage. Do you really think they designed it to ferry kids to school and make the owner good in bed? No, they were designed for farmers and emergency services.

  • Well, the statement "...they are bad because they transmit drive to..." sounded like implied support through sarcasm. Unforunately, vehicles like the old-style Landie, among others of that type and era--and more to the point, people/organisations who really NEED their core functionality--are now the exception, not the rule, as far as 4x4 owners in general go. Those stupid arsehole-wagons nowadays ARE intended EXACTLY for brainless mum-twats on school runs and selfish little yuppie fuckwits.

  • Exactly. With modern 4x4's, they keep on making them bigger and bigger so the owner doesn't have to worry about being hit by an even bigger car.

  • Most of them already couldn't care less if/when they kill the people in the smaller car they hit, conversely...One SUV (as we call them in NA) moron I argued with on a forum put it exactly that way: "Better the other guy than me!"

    Disgusting beyond description, these craven, credulous, little-spirited parasites.

  • I'd be prouder of these idiots if they would boycott playing football in the dark, cause of the power used by a stadium during one game is equal to 3-4 mW/h (about 1000 cars driving in city) (thats just the lights, without counting the power needed to dissolve all the turds flushed down the pottys)

  • what for a comment is that ? maybe if we all just blowup the USA maybe we all will get more healthy. or maybe we should watch tv anymore or not use cell-phones or use the internet ..last week a woman drove her SUV in the garage and didnt realise that she drove over an 8 year old and pulled him into the garage. 2 days later he was found.

  • You can't blame the car, it's the woman's fault for being American.

  • she was dutch .. the car was american !

  • Oh. Still dim-witted.

  • yeah .. its very dim-witted building/driving a car where you dont realise when you are running over kids/people/animals.

  • racist, if people are tall there for they need a bigger car. do u under stand

  • my be we should have left europe to fight ww2 by its self since they were doing so well.

  • tall ?!? you mean fat! that reply of yours is very lame man!

    americans did profit from ww2 .. thats why they joined the game. watch "zeitgeistmovie" to get informed you dork!

  • yes the netherlands were doing well in WW2 they were def beating the Germans mmmmhuuh yep. Or was it because dec 7 1944 when japaniese attacked pearl harbor and hitler him self in a speech on dec 8th decleared war on us because he thought that the japaniese had weakend us

  • Ignorant moron...typically American vacuous jingo-ism.

  • ddpxl u r the most retaded person on the face of the planet those people are in france "hince the frinch language that they are speaking" mercadies isnt american ist german retard. now ur facts before saying some thing. Americans speek english People from france speek french!

  • You do know that people in Belgium speak French too right?

  • Parts of Switzerland, and the Canadian province of Quebec, and many African countries too...

  • Great idea!

    Fuel is getting shorter on this planet while some rich people use more than their fair amount of it.

    Great idea!

  • vollidioten

  • they are ridiculous

    im against great cars because of global warming but

    this action is just ridiculous

  • For me it is all about avoiding the avoidable. Of course badly insulated houses are bad as well - just as eating meat or wasting electricity... we don't get anything by throwing rocks at one another. I rather prefer fixing the wrongs I have done and to work on my flaws. To the others I can only offer help, to do the same - sticking it to someone else is helping no one at all.

  • @ maiglocke: die rechenbespiele sind ja so nett, die eigentliche frage ist doch ob du an den Klimawandel glaubst, etwas dagegen tust indem du dein konsumverhalten überdenkst und ob die anschaffung eines suv ein schritt in die richtige richtung ist. übrigens passen in einen fox ebenfalls 3 personen und landrover sind sicherlich wie der rest der autos mit durchschnittlich 1,2 personen besetzt.

  • @Friedhof1

    Thank you for kindly providing the mileages.

    Without wanting to argue over a little math, maybe you should double-check yours --> Range Rover: 352 g CO2/(1 driver + 2 passengers) = 118 g CO2/person.

    Fox: 130 g CO2/person

    How popular would it be and how many laughs would you get, if red cards were to be distibuted to owners of older and badly insulated houses instead of giving them to well-off SUV-drivers? See, this is how Sozialneid works...or doesn't.

  • There are other cars than Range rovers that can comfortably carry 3 passengers. And a lot of them need less than half of the gas a Ranger Rover needs.

    That's not about Sozialneid, that's about individual responsibiliy.

  • @Maiglocke1:

    You should think yourself - and do some maths.

    A Range Rover - as shown in the scene - needs 14.9 litres per 100 kms. A Volkswagen Fox needs 4.9 litres - this is one third. Emissions of carbone dioxide: Range Rover 352, Fox 130.

    So, the red cards are appropiate.

    Of course, you are free to join the movement with yellow cards for the small cars with one person and no luggage or merchandise inside - and some flowers for bikers and pedestrians.

  • So what will happen if they stop a security car with armed bodyguards inside? Have fun...

  • we re talking EUROPE here.

    We don't have ridicilous

    'security car with armed bodyguards inside'

    running around our cities

    (besides - don't believe what you see in your telly (CSI?!)!)

    SUV sux. They are - in addition to their decadent size and criminal pollution - much more deadly to children and bike riders in acse of an accident.

    (Oh - I forgot, you don't have like pedestrians and/or cyclists in like 98% of your cities?! I don't talk about the big ones.. I talk average countryside/province)

  • Ah ok, so there is no NATO, no EU, no embassies in Bruxelles... Nice to know... I would feel threatened when a group of hillybillies surrounds my car and starts yelling and shouting. Hopefully anybody didn't get seriously hurt...

  • @own Relgion:

    They are not French, they are Belgians. Brussels still belongs to Belgium (well, this may change within some years, regarding the separation movements in this country).

  • This event is cute but worthless. A SUV with two passengers uses less fuel/(person*distance) than a normal car with only one person inside. Why don't the protesters give red cards based on this kind of personal energy usage? Oh, wait...that's because it would include rational thinking instead of pure populism.

  • "A SUV with two passengers uses less fuel/(person*distance) than a normal car with only one person inside. " Wow !!! A car with five people in it needs less fuel per Person than a car with one person in it. Bravo, you must be a genius in mathematics!!! Believe it or not: Even normal cars can (and do) carry two passengers...

  • You are right, but the first think to solve is the nonsense of a SUV (or 4x4) in city traffic. When such monsters are erased from the city traffic then your concept of "punishing" single drivers may be applied. Don't mix themes just trying to excuse the use of SUV.

  • Well, I love the French people they realy know how to say their opinion.

    This is a quiet nice ideal for us German!!!

  • How true man... wie wahr.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more