@LucasBenge The Tsar bomba was the largest Hydrogen bomb ever detonated period. The commentator may be speaking of the original bomb the Tsar bomba was going to be made as and that was an estimated 100 megaton weapon. The Tsar bomba is actually a scaled down version of the 100 megaton weapon.
The Explosion at 0:45 and on, could not be from the Tsar Bomba! The Tsar was detonated a couple of miles above earth surface! this should be from another detonation instead, but was amazing anyway!
The only way there will ever be peace on earth, is to abolish a standing military organization anywhere on the earth. It is one of the gravest dangers that confronts life on the earth.
@olga2415 It is kind of sad that humanity still has yet to collectively learn to resolve conflict between nations via a court system. As long as there are nations that decide not yield to the authority of an international court system set up to settle disputes between nations, there will be a need for nations to keep a standing military. If the world would be willing to take out all the two bit thugs that call themselves leaders... then it might actually happen....but until then..
@ezsparky Yes. Too bad there are so many creatures on the earth that call themselves human beings who have let greed , avarice and envy get the best of them and that the world even needs an international court system to keep order among nations. The larger any governing body gets the more likekly it is to become corrupted. There must be a law of physics in the mix somwhere.
@ezsparky Negotiatin, colaberating, and finding solutions is so time consuming.. We can just push a few buttons and kill a few million it's just faster. Saves so much time for things like Michelle Obama and what she's wearing today and what show she's on and whos elbows she's bumping. You know, the important things.
@ezsparky The two bit thugs are the ruling elites and all the standing armies are private and they belong to the elites. They are so wealthy and organized, nothing can stand up to them. They are the ones who start all the skirmishes and wars all over the world. It it those armies I take issue with. There will always be a way for small groups to band together into some sort of militia or army, but they do not nave the destructive power of the ones put together by the ruling elites.
@olga2415 Okay, you wished it. My fellow, now it is Anarchy. There are not anymore control, no military. Fortunately, your a in peaceful neighbourhood. But now is the time some people greed for power. They take guns and weapons, and it is soon there is a warlord in the region. Back to dark times.
Good it's about time since this evil collective social ortook all of my possessions
using the COLOR OF LAW, when a person is forced to lose everything he has worked for over the last 30 years the only thoughs on his mind is death and destruction on the whole world, and believe it or not, revenge is a natural behavior pattern, when things like what happened to me happen, and who gives a crap about what you write about on this stupid internet- first your hooked on T.V.
Who cares if the Russians made the biggest bomb they shoot there's at USA then the USA will shoot there's at the Russians either way every1 dies regardless of how many mt it is
I think they got some mis-information put in the video. The fireball should be 6 miles in diameter, not a 30 mile radius. I believe they meant it's main killing radius is 30 miles outward of ground zero.
He was obsessed with two things: growing corn and rockets. He didn't know much about it, yet he was a very confident man.
An example to illustrate it: soviet designers were given a task to design new money for USSR. When they showed their first prototypes to Khruschov, he took his wallet, and compared wallet size to those bank notes size. Then he drew a line with his fingernail on a bill and said: "make them this size".
they said "Biggest explosion in history." WRONG! Biggest explosion in history taht was man-made. Actually certain explosions in space are many millions of times bigger than this particular bomb. But it is a cool bomb!
lol Well Dah! Being that it is stated within the context of the video (in the context of the whole show... not just this short video clip that is), I think that they correctly assume that we should understand that they are talking about man made explosions... That is just simple common sense. I can see you point though being this is just a small part of the whole show. That was too funny.... lol
@raredunks Well that is kind of true. But not all the way. We live on Earth which is in space. Space is never-ending, and holds everything in the universe. Therefore everything on Earth, or any other planet near or far, is actually in space. Reply to that.
@raredunks As i said in my last comment, we do live in space. Think of space as a country and earth as a state. The state is in the country, as is earth in space. So as i stated before, we do actually live in space. And Until I start living in space my point would be valid? Nice grammar......
@Ashten2008 well if you live in space record a video of your house and how you live up there. Its like saying I live in russia and when I don't. Astronaut are the ones that can say anything. On top of that he stated the biggest "H-BOMB!!!!!!" don't know what type of explosion you are talking about in space. I don't think there talking about meteors. Go fuck yourself and play MW2.
@raredunks well i think, if you were any smarter than your whore mother, that you would realize what im saying. And the title say Biggest H-Bomb, the video says biggest explosion in history. So why dont you go fuck yourself and play Halo 3.
@Ashten2008 Yeah you know, because that Big Bang theory is just small potatoes. Actually, in Soviet Russia the Czar Bomba detonates YOU (for thermonuclear effects)!
@megadeathx What the hell are you talking about? I sated nothing about a "Big Bang Theory". That is the dumbest theory of the creation of the universe as any other one i have ever heard. Now im done with this argument, as my point should have been made by now. And if you dont understand it, your either really stupid or really stuborn.
@Ashten2008 OMG guy, did you know that the Big Bang was the biggest explosion in history? It literally was so large, that it created the universe. I replied to your previous comment above mine, not the one immediately above mine. Not to mention every super nova since then...
Also, the Flying Spagghetti Monster does not count as a dumb theory. I don't know what others you've heard that you thought we dumb, but that one was a joke so it gets a pass.
I thought that H-bombs more powerful are than TNT?
btw
the most dangeraus bomb would be the anti-matter bomb. but we have only got a little bit of it but is would be able to desolve earth for the universe. XD
you ignorant little turd, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, nor do you have any realtive comprehension of the true horror of this bomb
wtf are you talking about, I know the damage of the tsar bomb and the H bomb and the atom bomb, but your not gonna tell me that TNT is more powerful than a anti-matter bomb where from just a few nano grams equals the same power of 3 TNT sticks!
yes true, i have to give you credit about that being true. The thing is that amount of total anti-matter has come to no were near that amount at one point in time
yeah, and I also think that by the time that we're able to have that amount of anti-matter we discovered somthing even more powerful and easier to collect explosive kinda thing. ;-p
yeah, i understand how things like this are interesting in terms of education and a source of energy...but i just do not see the point in making things like this because it will eventually just be used to kill fellow humans
oh yeah by the way TNT has nothing to do with this, as far as a weapon of mass destruction TNT is way out of the question. the little boy atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima was equall to 20,000 tons of TNT
No you can't a ThermoNuclear weapon anywhere near a megaton in power costs $Millions to make, they aren't gonna sell them at all, let alone for the price of a BMW
Constructing nuclear weapons is pretty much impossible for individuals. Even *if* you can get your hands on U-235 it's still pretty much impossible to construct an A-bomb. Years of research, trial, error & development are needed - with a whole team that is.
Constructing H-bombs is utterly impossible. Not only is the Teller-Ulam design *highly* classified, it is extremely complicated to build.
Hybrid bombs?!? What?!? From what I understand.....
The only way to get enough pressure and heat required for the fusion of a hydrogen isotope is by a fisson bomb. Meaning, fusion bombs always have required a fisson bomb to work.
So is a "hydrogen bomb" more powerful than an atomic bomb. And is an atomic bomb a "nuclear bomb" or are they both............. Sorry for all of the questions. I just find it quite fascinating :)
Yes, the H Bomb is more powerful that an Atomic Bomb.
Yes, an Atomic Bomb is a nuclear bomb. The Atomic Bomb works by splitting atoms apart.
Yes an H Bomb is also a nuclear bomb. It works by fussing together atoms, the opposite of the atomic bomb.
Nuclear is a generic term used to describe the type or class of bomb that both of these are. They are both nuclear bombs just 2 different kinds of nuclear bombs.
Sometimes people us the term Atomic Bomb generically as well..
Though people do this, it probably is not technically correct. I often do this without thinking.
It gets worse because in every H Bomb there is also an Atomic Bomb. In order to get an H bomb to explode, it takes setting off of an Atomic bomb inside the H-bomb.
Even more confusing, there are hybrid bombs where they get both fusion and fission reactions mixed or seeded together by mixing the different nuclear material, fusion and fission material. By mixing the different material together, they can get bigger explosions in smaller packages. It also gives the great control on the strength of the explosion. It also give them control over the nature of the explosion.
The thermonuclear weapon requires a higher energy to start the fusion of the hydrogen isotopes. ALL, no exceptions, military fusion bombs (Hydrogen bomb, Thermonuclear warheads,etc.) use a Fission "trigger" to start the process of fusion. Likewise, ALL Fission military grade bombs use a high explosive as a trigger in order to achieve a critical mass density that causes the chain reaction of fission.
The thermonuclear weapon requires a higher energy to start the fusion of the hydrogen isotopes. ALL, no exceptions, military fusion bombs (Hydrogen bomb, Thermonuclear warheads,etc.) use a Fission "trigger" to start the process of fusion. Likewise, ALL Fission military grade bombs use a high explosive as a trigger in order to achieve a critical mass density that causes the chain reaction of fission.
Thanks mate. Ive always assumed that an atomic bomb was more powerful. I guess it was just because it's more commonly talked about. Plus the fact that I thought that "nuclear bombs" were just atomic and did not include "hydrgen bombs"...... I guess you learn something new everyday
they are both nuclear............it depends on its design it can be nuclear fission reaction (an A bomb for example) or nuclear fusion which uses light elements like hydrogen to create a highly energetic reaction.................. a h bomb is more powerfull as it creates more energy in the fusion.................. because in fission it is the spliting of unstable elements like uranium which are also very heavy....... fusion is more efficient and produces less fallout
A hydrogen bomb is far more powerful than a atomic bomb because a hydrogen bomb is when smaller molecules are fussed together to make a bigger molecule, where as in an atomic bomb fission is the main cause that causes bigger molecules to break down into smaller ones. In order to fuse the hydrogen atoms together to set off that kind of bomb it has to reach a temperture of 100 million kelvin, therfore an atomick bomb is set off first in order to get tehy hydrogen bomb to exploed.
Sort of. Atom bombs have a limited size due to critical mass of the fissile elements, thus limiting the size of the explosion, whereas an H-bomb doesn't have radioactive explosive elements that can go critical. You can put deuterium in a volume the size of a large planet without going critical. Uranium is critical at softball sized pieces. The A-bomb in an H-bomb as a detonator can be rather small compared to the H-bomb blast itself.
Yes and it was a watered down version. The bomb was designed to produce a 100 mega ton explosion. That is 100 million tons of TNT. This test was a 1/2 power test. It ended up being a 57 mega ton.
Most US nukes are much smaller... mostly because our ICBMs have always been much more accurate making them more effective, efficient. This also allowed us to use the MRV approach. I'm not sure if I have the acronym right. Multiple Reentry Vehicles (MRV) are warheads that sit on top of one ICBM. Russia's ICBMs were never very accurate so they had to put bigger warheads on them to insure that they would take out the intended target which kind of sucked for us. lol
it's a threat. If you have a big bomb then there going to think twice about attacking you. Same principal as having a bigger stick than the other guy,
I understood that much ;) But there's no poin. its a endless sircle. If one of those gets fired the retaliations will cost more lives than the last centuries natural catastrophies combined... and just having one of those stored within USA is a threat to the nation in itself. The stick comment was a good metaphore by the way :) Einstein said that "I don't know what WW3 is going to be like, but I know that WW4 will be fought with wooden clubbs" ...or at least it was something like that ;)
II picked it up from my history book way back, it's one of those sayings that just stick.. :) If they used it in COD4, wouldn't it give the player a guilty conchense ;) It's actually a pretty good quote.. and probably true... scary enough.
He was no saint in any way though, neglecting his family, and taking the full credit for the relativity theory, when his wife co-wrote it. But he said some pretty wise things, knowing people would use the fresh knowlege to find more inventive ways to kill each other, as usual.
I must admit though that I first watched this video to see a gigantic explotion ;) So I'm one hypocritical bastard.
Then, the big question is, if we look at it strategically from the gouvernment perspctive.. would that mean that "everybody wins" sinse all enemies are destroyed, or should we call it a "draw" ;) Nuclear weapons is one of the most dangerous exaples of stupidity there is. Us sane people would realize that there would be no winners.
@Wowbagger86 if I was in charge, all the nukes would be in control fo the United Nations and only used by Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck to save us from big rocks in space
they fire them all the time, didint you see the footage? thats it being fired noob, they do tests all the time, they fire them as citys rarely, im pretty sure only once, it looks big but from space it honestly isnt THAT big, theyd have to fire thousands to end the world
@Bladenavor you're incredibly stupid. Wowbagger86 was speculating about what would happen if a country attacked another that has nukes with nukes, and I responded that it would be the end of the world. Wh? We all learned this in 5th grade... Fire a nuke at a country that has nukes, it will shoot back..These countries are allied to other countries that have nukes, and then it will be international nuclear war, which will kill the entire planet
There is no point with nuclear/hydrogen weapons ...war used to be over land and resourses, this will pretty much ruin everything in it's way. It's just for spreading terror... We can destroy the planet within minutes if we fired all the worlds nuclear weapons off at the same time (actual fact.) What the hell would be the point of that???
how big is the crater????
DJHumla 4 weeks ago
Pure insanity
xXWarFaceXx1 1 month ago
"...an even more frightening one."
...Shagohod?
FrankiEmo92 1 month ago
You motherfuckers are going to the fire ball in washington all over america
YUSKHAN 3 months ago
50mt
sprengmeister00 4 months ago
WHICH IS THE MORE DANGEROUS ONE!!!!
LucasBenge 5 months ago
@LucasBenge The Tsar bomba was the largest Hydrogen bomb ever detonated period. The commentator may be speaking of the original bomb the Tsar bomba was going to be made as and that was an estimated 100 megaton weapon. The Tsar bomba is actually a scaled down version of the 100 megaton weapon.
blitzkreig052777 5 months ago
The Explosion at 0:45 and on, could not be from the Tsar Bomba! The Tsar was detonated a couple of miles above earth surface! this should be from another detonation instead, but was amazing anyway!
juanpa1979X 5 months ago
its Russian H - BOMB
TheDataHero99 6 months ago
at the end they mention an even more dangerous one.
any information on it?
anyone?
SilentToe 6 months ago
@SilentToe Look up THE B53 NUCLEAR BOMB.
TheMrblazer76 4 months ago
@TheMrblazer76
I checked with wikipedia, and the tsar was more powerfull.
The B53 was the biggest the US built.
In the Video they say that russia tried an even more dangerous one.
SilentToe 4 months ago
whats the name of this documentary?
phobiazzzero 6 months ago
youtube is so fuckin slowly -.-
Bushbreak 7 months ago
me cago en sus pruebas nucleares
sefuhmog 8 months ago
57 fucking MEGA tons. that is just crazy
delchubut21 8 months ago
I cant remember when I built this fireworks xD
instrumentenfreak 9 months ago
that is a good wat to pollute our waters/Fish/Food/Enviorment. bravo?
MrRichieRichieRichie 9 months ago
Psssst.... How many do you need.. I know a guy. :P
(Just Kidding Homeland Security)
ezsparky 10 months ago 18
@ezsparky if you can read this, i think you've been forgiven
Hinrichten 9 months ago
Reading some of the comments herein, I am almost tempted to agree that mass genocide is the way to go.
olga2415 10 months ago 6
@olga2415 ROTFL I think we could widen the scope substantially and still come to the same conclusion... :P Just Kidding :D
ezsparky 10 months ago
@ezsparky I "get" you. lol I agree. And I'm not kidding.
olga2415 10 months ago
The only way there will ever be peace on earth, is to abolish a standing military organization anywhere on the earth. It is one of the gravest dangers that confronts life on the earth.
olga2415 10 months ago
@olga2415 It is kind of sad that humanity still has yet to collectively learn to resolve conflict between nations via a court system. As long as there are nations that decide not yield to the authority of an international court system set up to settle disputes between nations, there will be a need for nations to keep a standing military. If the world would be willing to take out all the two bit thugs that call themselves leaders... then it might actually happen....but until then..
ezsparky 10 months ago
@ezsparky Yes. Too bad there are so many creatures on the earth that call themselves human beings who have let greed , avarice and envy get the best of them and that the world even needs an international court system to keep order among nations. The larger any governing body gets the more likekly it is to become corrupted. There must be a law of physics in the mix somwhere.
olga2415 10 months ago
@ezsparky Negotiatin, colaberating, and finding solutions is so time consuming.. We can just push a few buttons and kill a few million it's just faster. Saves so much time for things like Michelle Obama and what she's wearing today and what show she's on and whos elbows she's bumping. You know, the important things.
JakeEvilclown 7 months ago
@ezsparky The two bit thugs are the ruling elites and all the standing armies are private and they belong to the elites. They are so wealthy and organized, nothing can stand up to them. They are the ones who start all the skirmishes and wars all over the world. It it those armies I take issue with. There will always be a way for small groups to band together into some sort of militia or army, but they do not nave the destructive power of the ones put together by the ruling elites.
olga2415 6 months ago
@olga2415 Okay, you wished it. My fellow, now it is Anarchy. There are not anymore control, no military. Fortunately, your a in peaceful neighbourhood. But now is the time some people greed for power. They take guns and weapons, and it is soon there is a warlord in the region. Back to dark times.
Rhinoch8 6 months ago
hi how to make nuclear bomb? i wana to learn
AdamRyan2012 11 months ago
@AdamRyan2012 uh its illegal
Mikey7889 10 months ago
@Mikey7889 haha....but learning is not illegal right...making is illgal...hehe
AdamRyan2012 10 months ago
Good it's about time since this evil collective social ortook all of my possessions
using the COLOR OF LAW, when a person is forced to lose everything he has worked for over the last 30 years the only thoughs on his mind is death and destruction on the whole world, and believe it or not, revenge is a natural behavior pattern, when things like what happened to me happen, and who gives a crap about what you write about on this stupid internet- first your hooked on T.V.
then your drug into it !
realitiesupremebeing 1 year ago
Bathe in the glow of Atom.(Fallout reference)
57thdarkspear 1 year ago
Who cares if the Russians made the biggest bomb they shoot there's at USA then the USA will shoot there's at the Russians either way every1 dies regardless of how many mt it is
ImThatSickKid760 1 year ago
My farts are more powerful. Just saying
Mchermsquatch 1 year ago
well at least we have it...lol..worst invention ever right there...
ltuomela 1 year ago
dont fuck with america bitches!!
flip980 1 year ago
@flip980 It's a Russian Bomb. When will they teach you Americans that Kruschev isn't just a good name for a wrestler?
mikefromauckland 1 year ago
@flip980 hahah typical stupid American america nyl did a 15 MT bomb and the russians which have fucked you in the ass did 57 MT
so dont fuck with the russians
goodgsea1985 1 year ago
@flip980 Soviet bomb, but if you ask me, both sides have (had) bombs with a higher degree of explosiveness.
UnchainTheNight1 1 year ago
This is the Tsar Bomba u retard -.-
Js0NiCe333 1 year ago
@Js0NiCe333 and? that exactly what it is, the tsar bomba is the largest man made explosion ever.
flamedrag18 1 year ago
mommy i want one!
13darkdragon 1 year ago
Einstein exclaimed when she saw the Little Boy explosion in Hiroshima: "For all that is sacred in this world, what have I done ?!?!?!"
And by the way, he was more than cedrto to worry!
c4rl0spunk 1 year ago
Why not bomb it at Justin Beveers house?
SMGJohn 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@SMGJohn who is Justin Beveers?
mitchqqqqqq 1 year ago
I think they got some mis-information put in the video. The fireball should be 6 miles in diameter, not a 30 mile radius. I believe they meant it's main killing radius is 30 miles outward of ground zero.
aardvark9100 1 year ago
This shit need be droped on those dot head bastards
cast390 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@raredunks I live in space. Check my channel. I've got videos of it.
Roflzmahwoflz 1 year ago
big
KnuffiRulez 1 year ago
Please recommend me a safety dress that keeps me protected of such nuclear attacks in real atomic battle!
droppermyth1 1 year ago
wait how do u spell cruzchef?
saberallen5 1 year ago
@saberallen5 kruschev
zzzIdividedbyzerozzz 1 year ago
@saberallen5 "Khruschov" (Хрущев).
He was obsessed with two things: growing corn and rockets. He didn't know much about it, yet he was a very confident man.
An example to illustrate it: soviet designers were given a task to design new money for USSR. When they showed their first prototypes to Khruschov, he took his wallet, and compared wallet size to those bank notes size. Then he drew a line with his fingernail on a bill and said: "make them this size".
GJEihwaz 1 year ago
Jesus. Why?
idigghx 1 year ago
hyrogen bomb i fucking crazy
blodygi 1 year ago
they said "Biggest explosion in history." WRONG! Biggest explosion in history taht was man-made. Actually certain explosions in space are many millions of times bigger than this particular bomb. But it is a cool bomb!
Ashten2008 1 year ago
@Ashten2008
lol Well Dah! Being that it is stated within the context of the video (in the context of the whole show... not just this short video clip that is), I think that they correctly assume that we should understand that they are talking about man made explosions... That is just simple common sense. I can see you point though being this is just a small part of the whole show. That was too funny.... lol
ezsparky 1 year ago 8
@Ashten2008 wELL WE DON'T LIVE IN SPACE WE LIVE ON EARTH.
raredunks 1 year ago
@raredunks Well that is kind of true. But not all the way. We live on Earth which is in space. Space is never-ending, and holds everything in the universe. Therefore everything on Earth, or any other planet near or far, is actually in space. Reply to that.
Ashten2008 1 year ago
@Ashten2008 Well until you start living in space your point would be valid. As for now it's void.
raredunks 1 year ago
@raredunks As i said in my last comment, we do live in space. Think of space as a country and earth as a state. The state is in the country, as is earth in space. So as i stated before, we do actually live in space. And Until I start living in space my point would be valid? Nice grammar......
Ashten2008 1 year ago
@Ashten2008 well if you live in space record a video of your house and how you live up there. Its like saying I live in russia and when I don't. Astronaut are the ones that can say anything. On top of that he stated the biggest "H-BOMB!!!!!!" don't know what type of explosion you are talking about in space. I don't think there talking about meteors. Go fuck yourself and play MW2.
raredunks 1 year ago
@raredunks well i think, if you were any smarter than your whore mother, that you would realize what im saying. And the title say Biggest H-Bomb, the video says biggest explosion in history. So why dont you go fuck yourself and play Halo 3.
Ashten2008 1 year ago
@Ashten2008 WOW!!! are you a professor? cause that was some really well educated information!!!!!
bassbaboonmitch 1 year ago
@bassbaboonmitch being sarcastic? and if not, no i am not a professor.
Ashten2008 1 year ago
@Ashten2008 Obviously I was being fucking sarcastic...you dont need to be a university professor on youtube
bassbaboonmitch 1 year ago
@Ashten2008 Yeah you know, because that Big Bang theory is just small potatoes. Actually, in Soviet Russia the Czar Bomba detonates YOU (for thermonuclear effects)!
megadeathx 1 year ago
@megadeathx What the hell are you talking about? I sated nothing about a "Big Bang Theory". That is the dumbest theory of the creation of the universe as any other one i have ever heard. Now im done with this argument, as my point should have been made by now. And if you dont understand it, your either really stupid or really stuborn.
Ashten2008 1 year ago
@Ashten2008 OMG guy, did you know that the Big Bang was the biggest explosion in history? It literally was so large, that it created the universe. I replied to your previous comment above mine, not the one immediately above mine. Not to mention every super nova since then...
Also, the Flying Spagghetti Monster does not count as a dumb theory. I don't know what others you've heard that you thought we dumb, but that one was a joke so it gets a pass.
megadeathx 5 months ago
@Ashten2008
Hi Mr. FAIL
Mindpovver 10 months ago
rediculas
5dmc1 1 year ago
I like the MIRVs better. Less yield, sure, but multiple targets. I big bang isn't effective, you need many
TheRealTaco87 1 year ago
You gotta catch all those fucking idiot people who makes nuclear bombs and burn them alive.
Scream357 1 year ago
How nice of them to irradiate the planet for generations to come.
thisisitornot 1 year ago
OOOH!
Allspark262 1 year ago
*michael bay gets inspired
13L4CKsumi 1 year ago 3
for war !
theswordmaster17 1 year ago
why do we need bombs like those... answer that!!!
boatuser41 2 years ago
Comment removed
Wowbagger86 2 years ago
the "salted" bomb. or cobalt bomb will fuck us all over.. it is ever built. and used.
chorinicpker 2 years ago
so what's theat even more dangeraus bomb?
erfho8y 2 years ago
@erfho8y it's the tsar bomb
0987654321284 2 years ago
I thought that H-bombs more powerful are than TNT?
btw
the most dangeraus bomb would be the anti-matter bomb. but we have only got a little bit of it but is would be able to desolve earth for the universe. XD
erfho8y 2 years ago
you ignorant little turd, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, nor do you have any realtive comprehension of the true horror of this bomb
coolfool182 2 years ago
wtf are you talking about, I know the damage of the tsar bomb and the H bomb and the atom bomb, but your not gonna tell me that TNT is more powerful than a anti-matter bomb where from just a few nano grams equals the same power of 3 TNT sticks!
erfho8y 2 years ago
yes true, i have to give you credit about that being true. The thing is that amount of total anti-matter has come to no were near that amount at one point in time
coolfool182 2 years ago
@coolfool182
yeah, and I also think that by the time that we're able to have that amount of anti-matter we discovered somthing even more powerful and easier to collect explosive kinda thing. ;-p
erfho8y 2 years ago
yeah, i understand how things like this are interesting in terms of education and a source of energy...but i just do not see the point in making things like this because it will eventually just be used to kill fellow humans
coolfool182 2 years ago
oh yeah by the way TNT has nothing to do with this, as far as a weapon of mass destruction TNT is way out of the question. the little boy atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima was equall to 20,000 tons of TNT
coolfool182 2 years ago
Comment removed
refkywell 2 years ago
Do you know that you would absolutely turn into a little turd in the face of true horror as you comprehend this bomb relative to your position
wakkarat 2 years ago
what are you talking about
coolfool182 2 years ago
I'm talking about you my turd
wakkarat 2 years ago
Phalic Idiots
xsivstress 2 years ago
Hey where can I get one of these?
siberianhuskies1994 2 years ago 17
go to any eastern Europe country and you can have one with the price of a bmw car
refkywell 2 years ago 3
Aww. I don't wanna go to Europe...
siberianhuskies1994 2 years ago
No you can't a ThermoNuclear weapon anywhere near a megaton in power costs $Millions to make, they aren't gonna sell them at all, let alone for the price of a BMW
scartillery 2 years ago
seriously? what are they thinking?
Unown365 2 years ago
Comment removed
erfho8y 2 years ago
Constructing nuclear weapons is pretty much impossible for individuals. Even *if* you can get your hands on U-235 it's still pretty much impossible to construct an A-bomb. Years of research, trial, error & development are needed - with a whole team that is.
Constructing H-bombs is utterly impossible. Not only is the Teller-Ulam design *highly* classified, it is extremely complicated to build.
vanderbilt887 1 year ago
@siberianhuskies1994 ebay i guess??
MrYoyi96 1 year ago
@siberianhuskies1994 a guy in a flea-market in Torino,Italy, told me if I would buy one, long ago, hehe :P
cernacerna 10 months ago
Hybrid bombs?!? What?!? From what I understand.....
The only way to get enough pressure and heat required for the fusion of a hydrogen isotope is by a fisson bomb. Meaning, fusion bombs always have required a fisson bomb to work.
Hybrids?!? WTF?!
thedirtysideofdisco 2 years ago
HYDROGENS BOMBS
AICHIVAL2 2 years ago 2
Outstanding Post
xsivstress 2 years ago
Sorry, I do not remember the name.
I recorded off one of the Military Channel's shows. Maybe "Firepower" but I am not sure.
ezsparky 2 years ago
I'm confused. Isnt an H bomb a "hydrogen" bomb. But the "Tsar Bomba" wasn't....... At least I don't think it was
9H0ST00 2 years ago
Yes, an "H Bomb" is a "hydrogen bomb". It is also called a "thermonuclear bomb". All 3 names name the same type of bomb.
This bomb in the video, the Tsar Bomba, was indeed a H Bomb, a hydrogen bomb. The largest ever built and set off.
ezsparky 2 years ago
So is a "hydrogen bomb" more powerful than an atomic bomb. And is an atomic bomb a "nuclear bomb" or are they both............. Sorry for all of the questions. I just find it quite fascinating :)
9H0ST00 2 years ago
Yes, the H Bomb is more powerful that an Atomic Bomb.
Yes, an Atomic Bomb is a nuclear bomb. The Atomic Bomb works by splitting atoms apart.
Yes an H Bomb is also a nuclear bomb. It works by fussing together atoms, the opposite of the atomic bomb.
Nuclear is a generic term used to describe the type or class of bomb that both of these are. They are both nuclear bombs just 2 different kinds of nuclear bombs.
Sometimes people us the term Atomic Bomb generically as well..
ezsparky 2 years ago
Though people do this, it probably is not technically correct. I often do this without thinking.
It gets worse because in every H Bomb there is also an Atomic Bomb. In order to get an H bomb to explode, it takes setting off of an Atomic bomb inside the H-bomb.
ezsparky 2 years ago
Even more confusing, there are hybrid bombs where they get both fusion and fission reactions mixed or seeded together by mixing the different nuclear material, fusion and fission material. By mixing the different material together, they can get bigger explosions in smaller packages. It also gives the great control on the strength of the explosion. It also give them control over the nature of the explosion.
ezsparky 2 years ago
These hybrid bomb are really atomic bombs that are super charged by the seeding of the fusion material.
ezsparky 2 years ago
The thermonuclear weapon requires a higher energy to start the fusion of the hydrogen isotopes. ALL, no exceptions, military fusion bombs (Hydrogen bomb, Thermonuclear warheads,etc.) use a Fission "trigger" to start the process of fusion. Likewise, ALL Fission military grade bombs use a high explosive as a trigger in order to achieve a critical mass density that causes the chain reaction of fission.
kccoolguy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The thermonuclear weapon requires a higher energy to start the fusion of the hydrogen isotopes. ALL, no exceptions, military fusion bombs (Hydrogen bomb, Thermonuclear warheads,etc.) use a Fission "trigger" to start the process of fusion. Likewise, ALL Fission military grade bombs use a high explosive as a trigger in order to achieve a critical mass density that causes the chain reaction of fission.
kccoolguy 1 year ago
Thanks mate. Ive always assumed that an atomic bomb was more powerful. I guess it was just because it's more commonly talked about. Plus the fact that I thought that "nuclear bombs" were just atomic and did not include "hydrgen bombs"...... I guess you learn something new everyday
9H0ST00 2 years ago
they are both nuclear............it depends on its design it can be nuclear fission reaction (an A bomb for example) or nuclear fusion which uses light elements like hydrogen to create a highly energetic reaction.................. a h bomb is more powerfull as it creates more energy in the fusion.................. because in fission it is the spliting of unstable elements like uranium which are also very heavy....... fusion is more efficient and produces less fallout
b0v1n3 2 years ago
A hydrogen bomb is far more powerful than a atomic bomb because a hydrogen bomb is when smaller molecules are fussed together to make a bigger molecule, where as in an atomic bomb fission is the main cause that causes bigger molecules to break down into smaller ones. In order to fuse the hydrogen atoms together to set off that kind of bomb it has to reach a temperture of 100 million kelvin, therfore an atomick bomb is set off first in order to get tehy hydrogen bomb to exploed.
unclesam2005 2 years ago 3
Sort of. Atom bombs have a limited size due to critical mass of the fissile elements, thus limiting the size of the explosion, whereas an H-bomb doesn't have radioactive explosive elements that can go critical. You can put deuterium in a volume the size of a large planet without going critical. Uranium is critical at softball sized pieces. The A-bomb in an H-bomb as a detonator can be rather small compared to the H-bomb blast itself.
chaosopher23 2 years ago
MOAB?
Nameless666Maggot 2 years ago
No, this is not a MOAB.
A MOAB is a conventenal bomb using only high explosive.
A MOAB is NOT a Nuclear Bomb of any type.
ezsparky 2 years ago
Holy Shit !
thats all i can say
YaikonMetal 2 years ago
And I would say that is an understatement. LOL
ezsparky 2 years ago
Is this still the biggest bomb ever set off?
GGHT1320 2 years ago
Yes and it was a watered down version. The bomb was designed to produce a 100 mega ton explosion. That is 100 million tons of TNT. This test was a 1/2 power test. It ended up being a 57 mega ton.
ezsparky 2 years ago
Most US nukes are much smaller... mostly because our ICBMs have always been much more accurate making them more effective, efficient. This also allowed us to use the MRV approach. I'm not sure if I have the acronym right. Multiple Reentry Vehicles (MRV) are warheads that sit on top of one ICBM. Russia's ICBMs were never very accurate so they had to put bigger warheads on them to insure that they would take out the intended target which kind of sucked for us. lol
ezsparky 2 years ago
Tsar Bomba...lol
MrMakeman 2 years ago
yes, I've heard that they were afraid not to rupture the techtonic plates and produce a catastrophic disaster and destroy the balance of the nature.
radu3x 2 years ago
where do they even do
this?
svajcneger 2 years ago
In the back country of the USSR. If you listen close to the audio, they may tell where exactly it was set off.
ezsparky 2 years ago
ya its "i dont no what weapons ww3 will be fought with, but ww4 will be fought with sticks"
buzzyinurface 2 years ago 5
Didnt those pilots die cause of the radiation?
badb0y1300 2 years ago
Right, so to scare people, we have to blow up the planet inorder to stop us blowing up the planet.
twofootsheep 2 years ago 10
What's the point?
Wowbagger86 2 years ago
it's a threat. If you have a big bomb then there going to think twice about attacking you. Same principal as having a bigger stick than the other guy,
Flyer745 2 years ago
I understood that much ;) But there's no poin. its a endless sircle. If one of those gets fired the retaliations will cost more lives than the last centuries natural catastrophies combined... and just having one of those stored within USA is a threat to the nation in itself. The stick comment was a good metaphore by the way :) Einstein said that "I don't know what WW3 is going to be like, but I know that WW4 will be fought with wooden clubbs" ...or at least it was something like that ;)
Wowbagger86 2 years ago
oooohh einstein says that when ya die in cod4 (random comment)
ConnorTaylorBP 2 years ago
II picked it up from my history book way back, it's one of those sayings that just stick.. :) If they used it in COD4, wouldn't it give the player a guilty conchense ;) It's actually a pretty good quote.. and probably true... scary enough.
Wowbagger86 2 years ago
agree
ConnorTaylorBP 2 years ago
I believe it was Einstein that first said it but I am not 100% sure.
ezsparky 2 years ago
I know he did, I just dont remember if I mentioned who said it. He said many of these sort of things... to bad I got the mind of a goldfish.
Wowbagger86 2 years ago
He was no saint in any way though, neglecting his family, and taking the full credit for the relativity theory, when his wife co-wrote it. But he said some pretty wise things, knowing people would use the fresh knowlege to find more inventive ways to kill each other, as usual.
I must admit though that I first watched this video to see a gigantic explotion ;) So I'm one hypocritical bastard.
Wowbagger86 2 years ago
@Wowbagger86 If one gets fired, it's the end of the world. As simple as that.
yomama629 2 years ago
Then, the big question is, if we look at it strategically from the gouvernment perspctive.. would that mean that "everybody wins" sinse all enemies are destroyed, or should we call it a "draw" ;) Nuclear weapons is one of the most dangerous exaples of stupidity there is. Us sane people would realize that there would be no winners.
Wowbagger86 2 years ago
@Wowbagger86 if I was in charge, all the nukes would be in control fo the United Nations and only used by Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck to save us from big rocks in space
yomama629 2 years ago
lol, I would vote for you as world president ;)
Wowbagger86 2 years ago
why thank you :)
yomama629 2 years ago
@Wowbagger86
first, learn to; read, write, spell and count.
then your pointless comment, might have some-what meaning to everyone
Fata1ty4 2 years ago
Comment removed
Wowbagger86 2 years ago
well said just well said
nicopicous 2 years ago
@Wowbagger86
oh and btw
" exaples of stupidity... " you really are, thank you for showing(;
Fata1ty4 2 years ago
Comment removed
Wowbagger86 2 years ago
they fire them all the time, didint you see the footage? thats it being fired noob, they do tests all the time, they fire them as citys rarely, im pretty sure only once, it looks big but from space it honestly isnt THAT big, theyd have to fire thousands to end the world
Bladenavor 2 years ago
@Bladenavor you're incredibly stupid. Wowbagger86 was speculating about what would happen if a country attacked another that has nukes with nukes, and I responded that it would be the end of the world. Wh? We all learned this in 5th grade... Fire a nuke at a country that has nukes, it will shoot back..These countries are allied to other countries that have nukes, and then it will be international nuclear war, which will kill the entire planet
yomama629 2 years ago
actually i thought you meant as in if you fire 1 nuke the world would end so actually i thought that you where the dumb one
Bladenavor 2 years ago
@Bladenavor my advice: read the comments and think about them before replying
yomama629 2 years ago
There is no point with nuclear/hydrogen weapons ...war used to be over land and resourses, this will pretty much ruin everything in it's way. It's just for spreading terror... We can destroy the planet within minutes if we fired all the worlds nuclear weapons off at the same time (actual fact.) What the hell would be the point of that???
Wowbagger86 2 years ago 3
OK, I see this was a Soviet weapon... But no nations should store such veapons.
Wowbagger86 2 years ago 3
and that gonna be the cause of the broken of the ozono atmosferical
contra2224 2 years ago
21,000 views and no comments? WOW.
POTATOESLOL 2 years ago