In one week I saw Evanescence, The Pretty Reckless and Within Temptation. The best band, sound, singer and whole experience was Within Temptation. The live show was brilliant, the engergy amazing and Sharon's voice was sharp and clear from start to finish. Plus she wore her poppy for Rememberance Day which made her a top lady all round!
Holy crap. I was expecting it to be like, not even half an octave down from the other version. I mean, legit. Holy shit. How does she have such an intense voice range?! But still, EPIK!! :D
I love both versions of this song. But there is something about this version that is absolutely amazing. It also shows how incredibly talented Sharon is. \m/
This is a video of the NEW BAND of the Rhapsody of fire's drummer Alex Holzwarth and BlindGuardian's bassist Oliver Holzwarth called PERGANA (female gothic metal)
without the higher voice i dont have the feeling of some workshipper of the "ice queen is singing, more like some outside women that doesnt has a home trueley experienced the cold and lost someone because of it
@TheBestShinigamiEver Her voice is similar to mine. High and low version, I can reach this low and that high she does. When I am tired I may sing low. After singing all day.
@jakke1975 :-)you get that impression because sharon's voice is really ethereal like a crystal and with little volume when she sings in really high notes, so it seems like she's singing higher than she actually does. my personal opinion is that the notes of the original were a bit high for her range and the notes of this acoustic version a bit low. i believe that dear sharon must find her balance as regards to that matter and experiment less with the lower register.. her higher range is magical!
I know it is a couple of years a go i heard this version for the first time, but i already asked myself who raped the original icequeen song.. really think it is horrible how she sings this version
@blondetrol this is the sound you hear, when they sing ACOUSTIC and WITHOUT an fucking edited voice! What you hear is the original, all the tracks on the album you may have are the fakes!
@Sandsack2311 bullshit, she sings VERY high live usually, as an obsessed fan of her concert performances I can tell you she sings a WIDE variety of ranges. And often live she sounds exactly like the cd but switches up the order and the lyrics.
@TearisShatteredMoon This is true. They actually have a "live" ice queen track on the "Mother Earth" album, and she still sings it incredibly high (and amazing of course).
If you think about it, singing this song that high with very little instruments would be a little over the top.
as much as i love sharon, WT, and this song... i dont like this acoustic. it doesnt really work when she sings it low it doesn't haven't the same effect. plus... the piano doesn't sound right to me... but meh... i just wont listen to this version again lol :) *goes back to origional*
Sounds like it is too slow.. But I guess that is because I have an accoustic version of this song as well.. a bit different though. Think it is cool They are such Tori Amos fans...
Yes, this is Sharon. Her upper range voice and lower range voices are significantly different. But she can make them connect, which is the main factor.
A beautiful song. I think I like the acoustic version even better than the "electronic" version. The lyrics stand out much better in this version. In my opinion it's a great song to dream to.
wow sharon has the most beautifil voice ive ever heard. she is beautiful and is musically gifted. the bass to this song was nice and clear compared to some songs and i love it.
she sold out! that's the point,when ur a rock star,u got a certain status,but,wtf...musicaly speaking,when she made that song,she didn't advance musicaly,she advanced just in her $ count,which again,,sold out!
this si the only music i seen she sing low for all the song. i prefer this version when she does hight vocal seens like she is screaming instead of singin
In one week I saw Evanescence, The Pretty Reckless and Within Temptation. The best band, sound, singer and whole experience was Within Temptation. The live show was brilliant, the engergy amazing and Sharon's voice was sharp and clear from start to finish. Plus she wore her poppy for Rememberance Day which made her a top lady all round!
ShaneAWWolfe 2 months ago
Who is singing that...?
2:16 following => Ah! okay ist Sharon :-D
ValueOfOurWorld 3 months ago
Holy crap. I was expecting it to be like, not even half an octave down from the other version. I mean, legit. Holy shit. How does she have such an intense voice range?! But still, EPIK!! :D
RinNotMiku 4 months ago
I love both versions of this song. But there is something about this version that is absolutely amazing. It also shows how incredibly talented Sharon is. \m/
SageNemesis 4 months ago
awesome acoustic version of Ice Queen =)
really beautiful!!
WTtina 5 months ago
I love that she gives the song this jazzy feeling by changing the melody. Almost better than the original. Almost :P
Asrialth 6 months ago
when she sings higher we recognize her. wow i like her lower voice! more original!
clairenunavut 6 months ago
yea i already loved the original version, but i love this version more lol
unholyraviel1 6 months ago
Not their biggest fan, but I do love this song, and now I love it more because of this version.
trollfinger 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Look what I've found recently!!!
This is a video of the NEW BAND of the Rhapsody of fire's drummer Alex Holzwarth and BlindGuardian's bassist Oliver Holzwarth called PERGANA (female gothic metal)
/watch?v=CaHJjr_YOl0
Warriordung 7 months ago
wow, different voice and yea still good looking but my gf is better looking lol
unholyraviel1 7 months ago in playlist mixed music
SUPER-SUPER-SUPER
aleksandr11997788 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 8 months ago
heiii Sharon,
nice song.
remember that we have sung together on poduim?
when I was 4.
I am the daughter of raymond Looijestijn.
wwweeeerrr I go along to the fan club.
help and if possible talk to you like the vorrige times.
bye bye xxx my favorite song
pippie4 8 months ago
What a Voice.
I love Sharon.
I love Within Temp
hjs480 9 months ago
This version is so much better than the original.
Her voice sounds more natural and real.
myrezpro 10 months ago 2
without the higher voice i dont have the feeling of some workshipper of the "ice queen is singing, more like some outside women that doesnt has a home trueley experienced the cold and lost someone because of it
13thmistral 10 months ago
wow... i like this. she sound really different tho but different is good :D
MrNightwishify 10 months ago
very very nice
anke990 11 months ago
so many good voices and nightwish chose the worst....jee
probatos1 11 months ago
@probatos1 good god can we have one symphonic video without someone bitching about either anette or tarja? JUST ONE!
TearisShatteredMoon 9 months ago
Sounds a bit as if she smoked a sig to much...:-o
Infidelamsterdam 1 year ago
Sharon's voice is really low.
TheBestShinigamiEver 1 year ago
@TheBestShinigamiEver Her voice is similar to mine. High and low version, I can reach this low and that high she does. When I am tired I may sing low. After singing all day.
iamher87 1 year ago
She sort of sounds like Cher..
GothicBlue666 1 year ago
I don't like this version
staceysimba 1 year ago
i liked it better an octave higher.. it was more ethereal.. now it's more easy-listening and ordinary...
ProphetCassandra 1 year ago
@ProphetCassandra just 1 octove higher?? lol, the original sounds like 3 or 4 octaves higher xD
jakke1975 1 year ago
@jakke1975 :-)you get that impression because sharon's voice is really ethereal like a crystal and with little volume when she sings in really high notes, so it seems like she's singing higher than she actually does. my personal opinion is that the notes of the original were a bit high for her range and the notes of this acoustic version a bit low. i believe that dear sharon must find her balance as regards to that matter and experiment less with the lower register.. her higher range is magical!
ProphetCassandra 1 year ago
@ProphetCassandra this is just another version
xDamnLovelyx 1 year ago
shes singer an octave lower
nightwishfan06 1 year ago
hehehe,this was the song.... i sang it in DSDS in Koeln and they didnt like it :) so i cried all the day hihih :)
SimoPepi11 1 year ago
I love the acoustic version so much more! She sounds so awesome!
sirencc 1 year ago
I know it is a couple of years a go i heard this version for the first time, but i already asked myself who raped the original icequeen song.. really think it is horrible how she sings this version
blondetrol 1 year ago
@blondetrol this is the sound you hear, when they sing ACOUSTIC and WITHOUT an fucking edited voice! What you hear is the original, all the tracks on the album you may have are the fakes!
Sandsack2311 1 year ago
@Sandsack2311
if you hear the version with the Metropole Orchestra (which is live) Sharon sings really good, so stop slamming WT!
aka00blondie00 1 year ago
@Sandsack2311 bullshit, she sings VERY high live usually, as an obsessed fan of her concert performances I can tell you she sings a WIDE variety of ranges. And often live she sounds exactly like the cd but switches up the order and the lyrics.
TearisShatteredMoon 9 months ago
@TearisShatteredMoon This is true. They actually have a "live" ice queen track on the "Mother Earth" album, and she still sings it incredibly high (and amazing of course).
If you think about it, singing this song that high with very little instruments would be a little over the top.
Aisoyoyo 8 months ago
@Aisoyoyo Yep one of my favorite versions.
TearisShatteredMoon 8 months ago
Comment removed
missbluek 1 year ago
Comment removed
missbluek 1 year ago
i love how she can go extremely high and low too, like a wide range. I love this version too. i think its amazing!
PeaceOfTruth 1 year ago
omg... her voice..
sakuvana 1 year ago
as much as i love sharon, WT, and this song... i dont like this acoustic. it doesnt really work when she sings it low it doesn't haven't the same effect. plus... the piano doesn't sound right to me... but meh... i just wont listen to this version again lol :) *goes back to origional*
KubwaMoyoRattery 1 year ago
@KubwaMoyoRattery orignal * had to fix your mistakes !!
babbalouie23 1 year ago
omfg i love this woman *__*
Snaffis1 1 year ago
Sounds like it is too slow.. But I guess that is because I have an accoustic version of this song as well.. a bit different though. Think it is cool They are such Tori Amos fans...
Jannyca 1 year ago
When and where is this recorded? A morningshow like Giel perhaps?
LeafHuntress 1 year ago
her voice is very large...I think she can sing high and low too. it's great
aimeenka171 1 year ago
Sssssexey!
GrimReefer1983 1 year ago
wow! her voice sounds so deep!
JamieRoseVolturi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
She reminds me of Anne Wilson of Heart.
mobiledoggie 1 year ago
She reminds me of Anne Wilson of Heart.
mobiledoggie 1 year ago
she has fabulous vocal range. =) i love it!!
DysfunktionalMuse 1 year ago
This is so much better than the original "Ice queen". I like it! :D She sings very beautiful :)
Nesslu 1 year ago
*w*
AnaHalloween 1 year ago
Yes, this is Sharon. Her upper range voice and lower range voices are significantly different. But she can make them connect, which is the main factor.
ToxicDragonfly 1 year ago
Haha, lovely dutch accent.
Sharon is a great singer though.
SharDarksoul 1 year ago
I liked the other version better. Her voice sounds too old and low for me in that one.
Great band though!!!
demenea 1 year ago
who sings that version???
MsLarii95 1 year ago 11
@MsLarii95
Sharon Den Adel Sings on this version of course... because it's Within Temptation who is playing !
fabdu79 1 year ago 21
@fabdu79
wow this is sharon?
her voice is different......
MsLarii95 1 year ago 20
@MsLarii95
Yes, this is Sharon !!! And yes, her voice is different, but Sharon is a really talented, so she is a very great singer !!!
fabdu79 1 year ago 24
@fabdu79
You forgot to mention that she's very beautiful too :)
KiCU 7 months ago
@fabdu79 @fabdu well stated
cgar1014 5 months ago
@fabdu79 you just said the seem thing twice here... but your goddamn right! :D
tranquility660 5 months ago
@MsLarii95
It is different because she has been using many bass notes lately
EvilStargazer 1 year ago
@MsLarii95 blessed as she is, her voice has a very huge range.
ESPBVilleValo 11 months ago
@MsLarii95 you see it's accoustic right? I really like this "lower" voice.
kyuletzu 7 months ago
@MsLarii95 It's not different. It's her same voice, same style, different key.
deathbird1202 2 months ago
@deathbird1202
yes I finally understood :D
MsLarii95 2 months ago
@fabdu79
I agree with you :)
she´s a very good singer *_*
MsLarii95 1 year ago
@MsLarii95
LOL, the title says Accoustic!
No accounstic version sounds the same as a radio edit...
both versions have Sharon siging, Sharon rules!!
bpanther1981 1 year ago
Great band, thank you :)))
autostopowicz70 1 year ago
Every song is just awesome.
xxAtlantianKnightxx 1 year ago
My favourite Symphonic Metal band!
I love Sharon Den Adel so much *_*
She is very, very, very beautiful! s2
I love her voice!
patryciachan 1 year ago
i love sharon
the best voice
My Best song
Best Version
from france
On T'aime sharon :p:p:p
MaJiiNgrEgGB4 1 year ago
Pedazo de grupo , de lo mejorcito
kapitanmorgan 1 year ago
This band is magnificent.
Congratulations, the band won over a fan.
I loved you.
simoneanjinha 1 year ago 5
yes =very good song
vlad9vt 2 years ago 2
its my favourite song.
caladwvch 2 years ago 5
I can only say
WOW
I love Sharons voice <3
AnniXxXSchwemmi 2 years ago 8
No matter what she sings, she sings it awesomely.
Lythya 2 years ago 59
Wohoo that's awesome there should be acoustic versions to all of their songs :)
KadyFullySurrounded 2 years ago 3
Sharon den adel sing
18499 2 years ago
who is siging
pauzud 2 years ago
That's Sharon den Adel, she's from Holland.
crepe2nutella 2 years ago
Her lower range is so gorgeous!
likmysaltybalz87 2 years ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
Thuis 350 euro per week verdienen?
klick op mijn profiel voor de link!
RejectVacany 2 years ago
wow she has quite an expansive range
i was wondering why on wikipedia she is considered to be a mezzo-soprano
(i know wikipedia isnt a credible source)
moonlight225 2 years ago 4
I think some soprano's can't sing as high as she can^^
ximulady 2 years ago 4
i agree
WIKIPEDIA IS WRONG!
moonlight225 2 years ago
becuase mezzo-sopranos have incredible range, especially down the scale, but donot have the expansive whistle range that coloraturas have.
Denuhm 2 years ago
Mezzo-Sporanos are people who can not sing high and not low.
Reburga 2 years ago
A3-A5 is the general rule, but you can go a bit higher or lower ( about 3 notes either way...)
so no not quite true...
Denuhm 2 years ago
A beautiful song. I think I like the acoustic version even better than the "electronic" version. The lyrics stand out much better in this version. In my opinion it's a great song to dream to.
OldCrowle 2 years ago 6
o_0
krizel2604 2 years ago
just beatiful
there is nothing more to say
1982Florek 2 years ago 9
Wow @_@ The beginning sounded country-ish but the rest...beautiful...
kasami76 2 years ago 4
wow sharon has the most beautifil voice ive ever heard. she is beautiful and is musically gifted. the bass to this song was nice and clear compared to some songs and i love it.
KazanOzma 2 years ago 3
listen to that voice , amazing.With Within Tempation 4ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gawrra 2 years ago 7
wow this is sharon? nice! so there are singers that always sing great! finally i can sing this song without sounding weird. :D
pinklaurarose 2 years ago 41
This is really cool; I love acoustic versions and this one is really, really good. I like how she stayed low for the acoustic.
DahliaSensata 2 years ago 3
the only fact here is that youre a g-a-y -.-''
ThaMan1992 2 years ago
btw,for all those who - me 123123123,i really don't care and what i said about here... it's a fact lol..
JukkaNightwish 2 years ago
i just said... look back maybe page's 2,3,4
JukkaNightwish 2 years ago
amazing. she can go low and high, it's amazing. just plainly, freakin, amazing.
darkaqua543 2 years ago 7
right ;]
f1sher93 2 years ago
Wow this sounds almost like a completely new song. Love it!
Lucacs222 2 years ago 4
I love her as an alto too <3
BrandonHarami 2 years ago
i love it, its the only piece from WT that sounds kinda okay wwith my voice :D and it has nice lyrics
Sasjah97 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lol the first seconds it was Anette of Nightwish...
Mikosch2 2 years ago
omg her baby is SOO cute!!
little AIDEN!!
i love that name!
LanaexCullens 2 years ago
she's good tho,and again,that's my opinion,ppl who sell's out,worth a shit for me
JukkaNightwish 2 years ago
beautiful
tarjascabbia 2 years ago
sharon the adorable!
HarryGcylix 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
she's a btich,she went on house side .
JukkaNightwish 2 years ago
if you are referring to her collaboration with armin van buuren,(sigh) you don't truly understand music, its not just for you fool
machshin 2 years ago 2
she sold out! that's the point,when ur a rock star,u got a certain status,but,wtf...musicaly speaking,when she made that song,she didn't advance musicaly,she advanced just in her $ count,which again,,sold out!
JukkaNightwish 2 years ago
How dare you call her a bitch?!
You know her?! I don't think so.
Don't judge people which you don't know!
JustineDepp14 2 years ago 5
bitch= musicaly,and i know her musicaly
JukkaNightwish 2 years ago
Why you think she's bitch musicaly?
JustineDepp14 2 years ago 2
i like this :D
but i think i prefer high :D but it sounds nicee :D!
caro100863 2 years ago 3
szła by
azbestt 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Come and see my Ice Queen Live Cover and leave a comment!! XDXD
Arkana
DarkLadyAlone 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this si the only music i seen she sing low for all the song. i prefer this version when she does hight vocal seens like she is screaming instead of singin
Cromaxor 2 years ago
it cand of lose the felling of the song when they do the song like this
smguldtillfbk 2 years ago
(L)
SniperOzz 2 years ago
wow truly amazing <3
ppiimmaann87 2 years ago 6
I like the acoustic version better. :D I love that voice!
MiseryLovesCompany87 2 years ago 4
she's so amazing talented! Sharon, i ♥ you!!!!
wt for ever!
Jantessa 2 years ago 5
wow.... definately a change. I like the acoustic version too. didn't know she could sing that low too.
prowlerwolf88 2 years ago 4
Wow, I've never heard her sing this low for an entire song before. She truly is talented and I love this band. :)
Phantomofthe0pera 2 years ago 2
Beautiful +___+
4LikeDat 2 years ago
i preffer high vocals but this one is good too
DrakulaCod2 2 years ago 7
omgg, its amazingg i lAv u SHaroN!!!!!!1 xD
giseh88 2 years ago 2
wow! i have never heard the acoustic version before, just love it! thanks for uploading!
chrisnilsson91 2 years ago
is this sharon singing..?
RunAwayMakeHate 2 years ago
yes Of course !!!!!!! :)))
fabdu79 2 years ago
@RunAwayMakeHate >NOT a Chance< This is NO where near Sharon Adel's voice. There's only 1 Sharon, & only 1 "Within Temptation"
A very strong voice though "A bit like Cher"
Blessings All )O(
19Bob57 1 year ago
it is... well... different... hmm
Glumetzu 3 years ago
Awesome
Thanks for the video :D
lordfahad 3 years ago 4
nice vid I love WT!!
toasterdevil8000 3 years ago 3