TRAILER - 2001: a space odyssey

[kylebaseball25]

Kubrick was easily one of the best directors of all time; he was the only one who was meant to direct a movie like this

[harryfielder]

Worked on this film for one day at MGM Studios Borehamwood back in the good old days..

Talk about it on my web biog......

Aitch,

[funnyblog100]

oh god the original was the most boring thing ever and at the end everything was coming all doctor who for some reason

[geekyorc]

@277Sammy no this came out first you dumb fuck STFU

[bakhtn]

the film looks like it was made in the 90s not 68, ahead of its time

[edunicastro]

worst trailer ever.

[Lomaxxx53]

@edunicastro go fuck yourself

[evilbob91]

We went to the moon

[jonesfamilyphoto]

Boring movie, Great soundtrack.

[Wickerless]

@jonesfamilyphoto This Movie > Awesomeness. No argue.

[DevilMaster]

Special effects failure at 1:02: the shadows should be moving around because the space station is supposed to be spinning, but they are not!

[smokyp3nguin]

@DevilMaster They are moving.

[DevilMaster]

@smokyp3nguin No, they are not.

[pcobor]

@DevilMaster Space Station turns opposite from the light source so that the shadow should not be moved.

[DrumCoversFTW]

difficult but managed to masturbate too, came at 1:36.

[appleman1324]

if only this was accomplished ten fuckin years ago, oh well nasa is dust now ;)

[ScratchOnScratch]

all_time___classik

[RedBaronTDL]

I really hate when people make fun of the fact that this movie was supposed to be set ten years ago. the year 2001 is meant to symbolize the first step, or era, in a future period.

[alwaysallinneverfold]

@RedBaronTDL I wish had your "problems" lol

[RedBaronTDL]

@alwaysallinneverfold Yeah, well that's just like your opinion, man.

[Axxrat]

@RedBaronTDL No it is not. You are quite incorrect in this matter. After the Dawn Of Man scene we are transported directly to the space sequence of 1999. It is that year that scientists first discover the monolith in the crater of Tycho. It is two years later, 2001, when we see the Discovery approaching the moons of Jupiter. Sorry mate but you, and all them who thumbed you up, are completely wrong.

[RedBaronTDL]

@Axxrat Good point, but I don't see how that makes my comment wrong. This entire movie is almost all symbolic, why not the title as well?

[ludovico9vonz]

tesão de musica.

[Muzgar15]

Somebody had a wild imagination back then.

[philiporaski]

if there are no tengatango sex toys in outer space, I am not going!

[fiesta181]

An ape turns to the other and says: Hey, I think we can go to the moon!

LOL. Epic.

[specialchannel]

@fiesta181 tooken from bill hicks joke !

[fiesta181]

@specialchannel guilty as charged :)



[nyarlathotep989]

Watching this movie in anything but HD is a crime. It is much a visual experience (and what with that marvelous music, an auditory one as well).

[M4r7481]

Epic movie indeed

[laveyansatanist100]

EPIC !

[mvilcans]

That's a really good trailer!

[AngryLoo]

More like 2678: A Space Odyssey!

[vikh666]

MASTERPIECE!

[MrNickmani]

Clarke and Kubrick were prophetic! Oh, wait, none of that stuff ever happened.

Sorry....

[lwalpole]

I was obsessed with this film at a particular phase in my life some 30 years ago and I think this is an excellent reimaginationing of the origonal trailer. I know this film inside and out.

[mstrcht043]

so what is this movie actually about (without spoiling the ending please)

[zcarver25]

barack obama :26

[owensed01]

that bass is just...damn

[cplover3009]

Can anyone tell me what the giant baby's about and how that happend?

[xTReeTooNx]

@cplover3009 it's the next generation of humans

[cplover3009]

@xTReeTooNx IT

ALL

MAKES

SENSE

NOW

THANK YOU

[lawnsausages]

@cplover3009 That's not exactly correct. (no offense xTRe) A. C. Clarke and Stanely Kubrick wrote the screenplay together as AC was writing the novel and SK was trying to put together everything that goes into a movie. The two battled constantly (science vs. movie craft) and with only a couple scenes left to do Clarke told him to shove it, (they never spoke again) Clarke ended the book they way he wanted Kubrick did the same with the film. Read the book, If you want me to spoil it reply to this.

[nibus9]

ILLUMINATI ILLUMINATI --- ILL YOU ME nati ---------- makes you ill feverish death pale from mine and your cradle to grave .....

[Aaidas2]

If anyone is thinking of watching this, DON"T watch it, no matter what kubricks butt lickers say, it's a horrible movie, kubrick wanted to change the way story tellling is in movies with this shit, and he completely demolished everything about movies, better go watch paint dry, as this movie is pretty much equal to that. It's 3 hours of litelary nothing, delete the 99 % of this movie and you wont miss any point of it, because there is nom simply put it, it's SHIT. Horrible shit.

[KronnangDunn]

@Aaidas2 LOL TROLL...

[Aaidas2]

@KronnangDunn LOL, another idiot, you must enjoy watching 3hrs of nothing over and over again.

[KronnangDunn]

@Aaidas2 You are the bone... and I'm the monkey holding it. Back to the ground, tool...

[Aaidas2]

@KronnangDunn That's the only thing you can say? Go back watching 3hrs of nothing and continue licking kubricks hairy butt.

[KronnangDunn]

@Aaidas2 Whatever you say... bone.

[Aaidas2]

@KronnangDunn You must go deeper into kubricks ass!

[KronnangDunn]

@Aaidas2 Whatever you say... bone.

[ExtraTerrestrials]

let me get some weed

[GanjaKahn42O]

if you really want to watch something interesting look up physicist Michio Kaku, and look up his theory of the 3 different types of civilizations.

[MrDrIvan]

@GanjaKahn42O

Where to look ?

link?

[socialclub007]

waaaawww! me recuerda tanto a NIETZSCHE!! eL SUPER HOMBRE!!

[ThePoltergueist]

investigar11s. org

[TheMilagros59]

LA VIDA ES UNA ODISSEA

Y EN MI PATRIA VENEZUELA UNA REALIDAD

SON UN PLANETA DE SIMIOS ALGUNOS...

[1blaircamp]

This movie has earned my respect

But what i don't really is the ending where dave happens to be bedridden and also happens to be old

Can somebody tell me when was the book writtern??

[fifafreak310258]

@1blaircamp Wikipedia motherfucker! Do you read it? :P

[1blaircamp]

@1blaircamp

Wikipedia my ass

BTW you look like you masturbate on bieber's posters

[TodaysB34st]

@1blaircamp book was written simultaneously with the screenplay.... so 1966-1968 ish???

[Daniel0889]

Too bad Kubrick didn't make it to 2001 I think he would have been inspired to make another great movie since nearly nothing was similiar to reality compared to the movie...

[MeDappaDonn]

@Daniel0889 watch: William Cooper - Mystery Babylon Hour 1 - The Dawn of Man (Full Length)

[CHAOSin8bits]

theres a porno spoof called 2069: a sex odyssey

[ArcticBuckley]

@CHAOSin8bits This movie is much better than porn.

[Hasbo88]

a work of art that transcends film

[Gregoryno6]

A fine piece of editing. You've demonstrated how much movie previews (wtf do we call them 'trailers' when they come in ADVANCE?) have changed in forty years. At the time 2001 was released a 'coming soon' would usually run for three or four minutes and give a lot more detail about the cast and the director.

What really gets up my nose is that today the previews usually have most of the movies best lines. But you don't discover until after you've bought the ticket.

[tastypistachio]

Beautifully crafted piece of work on that trailer. Would have made a brilliant marketing piece. Kudos.

[2001keisuke]

この映画の持つ非常なインパクトは　製作者であるスタンリーキューブリックのみが成し得る事実と申し­上げるべきでしょう　彼のこの映画に掛ける情熱は　並々ならぬものがあります

実際にはクラークを顎で使い　映画上の全ての版権を独り占めし　又撮影の高名なアンズワースでさえ　彼の撮影技巧の高さには驚嘆しています　独自の考えで新たなる撮影方法を開発し　この映画の為だけに一回だけ使用しています　その後は一切の真似が出来ないように　全ての撮影用のセットの破壊をスタッフに指示しているほどです　いくつもの画期的な映像を画面上に登場させました　彼の栄光と挫折の始まりでもあったこの映画は日本では唯一の文部­省特選となってはいますが　お役人に　この映画の真の価値が判るとは　私には思えません

[neonman1604]

@2001keisuke that is so true what u just said there dude

[VivaLavada1]

does any one else think it's funny that the graphics from 2001 (1964 ) are better than 2010's? ( 1984)

[rogerwilco2]

It's nice, but not a trailer. It also focusses way to much on the space ships. Try making a trailer, something that would entice someone who hasn't seen the movie to go watch it. Interesting dialogs, fear, suspense, action. I would make a video response, but I don't have the skill and don't know how to make a youtube video.

[pinguinoafgano]

the best trailer i ever seen

[Alejoyjoy]

Me encanta cuando el mono comienza a saltar y arroja el hueso a partir del segundo 0:32

=D

[stevephengb]

For the late 60s, this movie was quite impressing and should have won Oscar.

[cyberdemon93]

i think this film would be much better without "and thus spoke zarathustra" and "the blue danube" because it doesn't fit the mood. however, the rest of the soundtrack in the movie is great.

[UncleRuckusNigga]

monkeys humping a rectangle in ssppppaaaccceee!!!

[bonilhaale]

Nietzsche, Strauss, Kubrick: da Aurora da humanidade ao super-homem

O triunfo da técnica torna-se uma conquista pálida diante da transcendência.

[VideoUploaderTester]

The technology used in this movie shows that moon landing hoax could be true :)

[alecdcpp]

saudade heim 1250

[Robalose]

While it might not be the most immediately entertaining movie, 2001 is definitely one of the best

[MichaelCox]

If I saw this back in the day, I'd either be high on weed and be like "DUDE..." or I'd be sober and normal and be like "WTF?!?!"

[crisdigi]

this flick=GOAT

[Warchief1521]

@edeyspeedy It's not a monkey, it's a very early hominid, probably homo erectis.

[Nightmare43009]

Berries, rainbows, unicorns, and niggers

[Colton5]

what the fuck are all of you nerds going on about, stop being weird and enjoy this 1960's movie trailer

[Comedianwartooth]

reaching jupiter and having AI by 2001.. the lolzs are endless

[Labjac]

@poke5thgen The government is too cheap to do that.

[norwegiantechnolover]

wtf, how could they make such detailed and realistic CGI models back in '68?? They barely had computers at that time!! :O

[conol77]

@norwegiantechnolover This is not made by computers... Star Wars spaceships weren't made by computers, it is model kits...

[MutantNinjaFly]

i dont get it what do the monkeys have anything to do with this? are they supposed to represent the dawn of man in some sort of contrast to his space age progress?

[Comedianwartooth]

@MutantNinjaFly and they link to the ambiguity of whatever that giant magnetic slab wa. but yes in my opinion you hit the nail on the head

[jcase15]

oh so that was what life was like 10 years ago!!!

[ALPHADESIGNTAMPICO]

@jcase15 Yeah but is kept as a secret for ordinary people u_u

[kayasulley]

more like 2090: A Space Odysssey (if that even)

[661Sunshine]

@kayasulley hahah ya pretty much. humans are shitty space traveller after all lol

[1Nekit1]

@kayasulley Ironically, by 2001 International Space Station (ISS) had its first "owners": expedition #1...

[themanclaw2]

@kayasulley We probably could have all that space technology if we invested money into it. Unfortunately, there isn't as much money to be made in discovery of the final frontier as there is in say, oil.

[xeadm]

@kayasulley Pff, not if i can help it.

* researches quantum physics*

[sporetazar]

ahhh... what?

[MTERM775]

HAL "Daisy, daisy. Give me your answer do. Im half crazy...."

[rhurt87058]

To make a film like this in the 1960s is unreal. 1968 is way before computers and especially CGI which all modern flicks use. All i need now is 3-D vision and the wife to be out of the house so I can blast the surround-sound!

[logitrol1]

Kubrick=sheer genius...

[wahahaisused]

da......da........da..........­.DADA!!!!!!!!!!!

[StrangeCognitivism]

When I watch this movie, I forget politics, I forget religion, I forget economics- all I know is that my brain wants to live inside this movie. Oh dear, one too many glases of Cabernet

[DrGonzoPrototype]

@StrangeCognitivism

INDEED!

[jatroup12]

If that was the actual trailer, it's a really good trailer. Most studios try to dumb down the trailers to the lowest common denominator, EVEN when they have a great film to advertise.

I can just see some idotic studio exec in 1968 trying to talk Stanley Kubric into including just one really good car chase scene for the trailer. Thanks for telling this story as pure as you could SK!

[aure232]

@poke5thgen Humans are always optimists, they hope the best even when it is ridiculous and unrealistic.

[VergilsRespite]

I'd like to see this, and I know this will sound pre-judgemental, but is this film about more then just an A.I. taking over a spacecraft? I mean, that doesn't really sound all that fun to me but, whatever.

[Ravenpulse]

@VergilsRespite Yes, it is far beyond the conflicts between dave and hal. it only uses hal to show something far greater that is really going on. it is about a force far greater than anything imaginable, responsible for creation and existence.

[MichaelLeroi]

@VergilsRespite it's about evolution, man's place in the universe, divine intervention and a whole lot of awesomeness.. see it for the love of god!

[SkaterDrummer678]

@MichaelLeroi explain the monoliths and what they represent

[MTERM775]

@SkaterDrummer678 The monoliths represent Knowledge. They represent a shard of perfection. They represent intelligence.

[singularwave]

Hail Satan!

[graffitisank]

i'm afraid....dave.

[theseventhson95]

This is the most epic sci fi movie i have ever seen in my whole fucking life.

[HuginnG]

it's a bloody shame one of the best directors in movie history didn't win an Oscar for hes excellent directing. Stanley Kubrick, i salute you.

[McLarenMercedes]

@HuginnG

Who cares? The Oscars have long lost their meaning. Truly great directors went without an Oscar like Stanley Kubrik and Ridley Scott. Martin Scorsese was nominated 6 or 7 times before winning it for his remake of "Infernal Affairs", the one he least deserved it for.

At the same time some special effects wizard who specializes on two-dimensional cardboard characters called James Cameron won best director for Titanic.

[tHeWasTeDYouTh]

@McLarenMercedes James Cameron is a fucking CUNT

his movies SUCK compared to Stanley Kubrik

[JordoF6]

@poke5thgen because its science fictions and thats like us setting a fictional ww3 in 2030 it may or not happen

[webheadpp]

i wanna see the sexy enhanced version hahahaha xD

[GuillerMak37]

AWESOME!!!

[91Kickflip]

i'm watching the movie right now...and it reminds me of dead space...this relic...you know? ^^ is it quite similar in some ways?

[McLarenMercedes]

@91Kickflip

They say that the 1972 classic sci-fi movie "Solyaris" was one of the influences for Dead Space. Both take place on a space station.In both there are people who see visions of those they love (which are supposedly on Earth) or other people from their past.In Solyaris it is also revealed that all the visions don't come from the space station but rather from some huge object (sort of a relic)on a nearby planet

In 2002 they made a remake called Solaris. Tarkovsky's original is better

[KADG81]

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOOO

[MultiUter]

Dieser Film ist BAHNBRECHEND gut!

allein die szene wo sein kamerad da auf einmal am fenster vorbeifliegt -echt übelst am schocken ohne sounds

[jolas2001]

Kubrick was a genius: This is the ever ultimate picture: from where do we come? To where are we going...?

[eleszar1]

why did he turn into a baby? :p what hapened some1 explane for me plz

[oskarscaikovskis2]

@eleszar1 He didn't turn into a baby! His body died, but his soul remained and he became a star child. Jesus Christ! Don't you know anything? Just joking! I didn't understand THE FIRST TIME I SAW THE MOVIE ether...

[bogmire777]

The greatest film, ever made...

[theeab1993]

@gurdianreaper that's bullshit, man will never be at peace

[nukeurhouse12]

this movie is so fucking weird. try watching it while high, or better while ur on shrooms

[roman1akid]

One of the finest films in history. A work of genius.

[GurdianReaper]

@roman1akid This is one of those milestones that redefined the Science fiction genre, like star trek it made people dream of what space could be, I think personally that space the final frontier will be where humanity will be at peace ( once we can travel it well and safely of course).

[smoozerish]

the supreme masterpiece from the master Mr. Kubrik

[maisqpoesia9999lcg]

Beautiful!!!

[RAYDENMORTALKOMBAT]

omg what a wonderful song

[TheReaperOFSoulss]

Ric Flair woooooooo wooooooooo

[MistaBigBoss]

I wonder how long 0:56-1:00 took to render with 60's computers, its actully quite amazing, to see that they were able to do that in the 60's

[irontree55]

@MistaBigBoss they didn't use computers... they're models. CGI sucks, nothing beats a real physical model

[TheStockwell]

@irontree55 . . . and huge models, too, so the cameras could get inches away and the models wouldn't LOOK like models. The circular space station "miniature" was six feet across.

[veterankrieger]

Yes, that's an i-phone, nerd -.-

[veterankrieger]

Yes, that's an i-phone, nerd -.-

[veterankrieger]

Yes, that's an i-phone, nerd -.-

[2ndviolin]

Omg, is that an i-phone at 0:20 ?!!!

[4PacHooptiRida]

niggers

[kneteanimator]

the graphics of this movie are better then the graphics from some movies in time between 1970-2000... why the hell had they so good cameras??

[DafTacoustics]

@kneteanimator Kubrick's first love was photography...he would often skip school to do work with a magazine in NYC called Look.

[5123wolf]

@kneteanimator It's because most modern films use digital, which is of lower quality than actual film.

[SovietUnity]

@kneteanimator that's why Stanley Kubrick was a genius

[christomacin]

@kneteanimator "the graphics of this movie are better then the graphics from some movies in time between 1970-2000... why the hell had they so good cameras??"

They used real cameras with real film for one thing...yes, it matters. Also, these cinematographers back then knew things about light and color which put the cinematography in most of today's films to shame. The majority of films back then had excellent photography.

[Legokink1]

@kneteanimator they used physical models and actual film instead of digital cg models and crappy digital cameras

[ArzenPT]

@kneteanimator ask james cameron! lol



[Jopari444]

@kneteanimator watch the warriors, the quality in it are also pretty nice

[master777999]

@kneteanimator Because it was shot on FILM. And 70mm film at that (the largest movie film available). No data capturing medium exists that is capable of what film is capable of, especially film that big.

If you were to scan the original 70mm film of this movie, you could get something between a 10k and 15k video before you would get any drop in quality of the picture. In comparison, the RED camera (the highest resolution digital movie camera available today) only shoots at a maximum of 4k.

[THORDEN86MX]

@kneteanimator It's because this movie, has something that not every film producer can achieve, even with the better special effects or the better cameras........Art. Everybody can make a movie, but only, a few film producers, like Stanley Kubrick, can make it an art masterpiece.

[neonzion7]

@kneteanimator They went through evolution

[kneteanimator]

@neonzion7 ?

[zhaang666]

@kneteanimator Film Cameras didnt really evolve that much...... Most "Good Graphics" in Films come from lighting and the stuff that is actually in the picture. and the Craftmanship that goes into making that stuff

Every HD Camera, even the ones they use in Hollywood movies or in medical science is not as sharp as a Film Camera in the 1960s