Added: 4 years ago
From: dfarmer1584
Views: 17,906
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (901)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @erickm16, the dates of the prophets/patriarchs is the FALSE teaching espused by the false teacher Bishop Usher, again used at the 1925 Scopes Monkey Trial, torn apart by Clarence Darrow, who by the way made WJ Bryan look like the fundie fool he was. Nearly 80 years later, a "Tannenberg Defeat" was inflicted on YECS in the Keystone State where they ATTEMPTED to foist their BS as science in the Dover SD, York County. YEC is NOT WELCOME in my state...see ya!

  • creation vs evolution . freeforums.  org

  • Not sure which is more lamentable, your own personal insecurity (which causes you to create this mockery of a song) or the fact that you have free time and access to resources to do it. I never saw Dr. Hovind making up songs and swearing to you personally (and by name) to drive a point accross! and you think HE's the F-tard? If you don't like his message, just say so, use your PhD to back up your claims.

  • @erickm16

    He's not "Dr. Hovind".

    He has a PhD from an unofficial bible school in "Christian Education".

    He has NEVER studied science.

    There are hundreds of videos all over youtube debunking his videos.

    This one is just for fun.

    Try "Why do people laugh at creationists" series for a start...

  • @ResiusOnline I was brought up with good manners, so out of respect I will call him Dr. If u had a PhD, i would call u Dr.

    Is this really ur idea of "just for fun"? it sounds like a very direct, indignant attack. Replace the name "Hovind" with "Obama"... I bet it would not be classified as "just for fun" anymore. And they say creationists have double-standards. Go to net-abbey (dot) org/evolutio (dot) htm and do a search "impossible" if u really think creationists should be laughed at!

  • @erickm16 YEc is a FALSE TEACHING, plain & simple. NOWHERE in ScrIPTURE is the age of creation mentioned but then again you can destroy the premise of YEC with things as radiometric dating, stellar nucleosyntheis and the like. FYI YECS..."C" is a CONSTANT, NOT A VARIABLE,thought you'd like to know...and DO NOT EVEN mention//Polonium Haloes ..polonium is a byproduct of Uranium decay as are Radon, Radium, etc. If it were not for Uranium decay, there would be NO RADIUM or RADON on Earth,

  • @biancademonet Well, u won't get an exact date from Scripture, but if u add up the years given in the old testament u get numbers that at least supports YEC theories, you know, something that supports YEC theory. People use such means, it's a valid method, a method that can lead to new evidence/data etc. I'm not sure about the Halos study, i'll have to get back 2 u on that one. As for the other dating methods, y is there always error margins if it is such an exact science method?

  • @erickm16 Creationists should NOT ONLY BE LAUGHED AT, their garbage be treated as JUNK SCIENCE and BANNED nationwide from public schools EXCEPT as "comparative religion, or comparative fiction

  • @biancademonet I think it would be a wonderful idea to leave YEC theories in the public school system for comparative religion, I'll even take comparative fiction. I think that when people study YEC evidence, they inevitably start questioning y it would b considered fiction. Usually when people are eager to shut it down it is because they fear the moral and spiritual implications if they were to discover that YEC theories are correct. So they throw "science" on it to "fix" the problem

  • @erickm16 YEC is a FALSE teaching based on the ASSumptions of an Irish Anglican bishop in the 18th century. NOWHERE in Scripture is the EXACT AGE of Creation mentioned. Legit science can be used to refute YEC EVERY TIME as it is 100% FALSE. I'm not denying the likelihood of a "Creator" helping to trigger events BILLIONS & Billions of years ago, what I'm refuting is the arrogant & false claims that it occurred a mere 6K years ago. Denying the FALSEHOOD that is YEC does NOT make one an atheist

  • @biancademonet Well, evolution is ALSO based on ASSumptions, it has to! There are some things that both sides simply dont know and we have 2 fill in the gaps with the best guesses based on the evidence available. U can also use legit science 2 refute evolution 2. And talk about arrogance! Evolutionsts have it also! Name calling, obscene rude videos, etc. Ridiculing the person instead of presenting a professional opposing point. No matter ur stance, this video shows the desperation of some!

  • @ResiusOnline I'm not hostile to religion myself. What I'm extremely hostile towards is the idea of religion being taught as science and those using religion to justify bigotry and subvert our sECULAR Constitutional REPUBLIC....

  • @erickm16 hovind's "PHD" was in RELIGION and from a "diploma mill"And 15 years of teaching YEC as a Hoamskooler DOESN'T make one a ":science teacher" . Oneway to refute YEC , for example uses the speed of light . Light speed or "c" is CONSTANT (ie UNCHANGING!). At 186,000 mps, it takes 4.3 YEARS for light from the nearest star to reach us and that shows us HOW THE STAR APPEARED 4.3 years ago. If YEc were TRUE...NOTHING further than 6000 light years away would be visible including the Milky Way

  • @biancademonet See what I mean? The attack on the person not the argument!!?? Y !!?? Is that the only measure left to discredit YEC? I dont agree with Dawkings or Hawkings, but i dont ridicule them in any way! If light is such a constant, y did Scientifc American write it has been slowed down as well as sped up? Hovind never gives a 6000 LYr limit on anything in space. It is possible that the creator placed those objects very far away as he "sretched the heavens" like theBible says.

  • @erickm16 Light's velocity HAS NEVER been measurably afected in lab tests. And FYI, the ONLY thing that affects light to a significant degree is GRAVITY, you know the force exerted by anything with MASS. Intense gravity will BEND lightwaves, maybe even capture them, but in NO WAY is the velocity affected. FAIL!

  • @biancademonet Oh so, Scientific American and other journals were lying? Also, the most "reliable experiments mesaure light against light, therefore any difference is not detectable, It's like measuring the height two exact twins, they both grow at the same rate, therefore one may conclude (erroneously) that they are not growing at all.

  • @erickm16 The velocity of light is NOT afected by ANYTHING my friend. IT IS A CONSTANT, so refrain from the YEC BS about C being a variable. If it WAS you'd be throwing relativistic theory into CHAOS. Vary C and you reallize the whole equation is ALTERED. . Gee I think Einstein, Hawking, Galileo, Kepler, & Newton have Hovind beat ...Hovindian Physics? LOL FAIL!Light can be reflected/Refracted...Intense gravity ALSO affects light.Gravity bending light PROVED EINSTEIN RIGHT in 1915......

  • @biancademonet So you ARE calling Sceintific American and other noted physicists BS-ing liars! WOW! That is a pretty bold thing to do. And it is not Hovidian Physics BTW, it is simple demonstrated science experiments. The science you hold on to so dearly has failed you. If you want to keep living in a world of failure and and believing that light is a constant DESPITE shown science experiments, go ahead... FAIL! And they say YECers are stubborn and dumb-witted.

  • @biancademonet - Just for kicks, I encourage/challenge you to watch his video number 7 "questions and answers" on his website at DR DINO . COM under video seminars

    If you could humour me on this one I'd be grateful.

    thanks

  • @erickm16 I'm not going to give "Dr." Hovind the time of day, let alone waste my time listening to his fabrications. Just because I think YEC is GARBAGE doesn't make me an atheist. I merely reject what I consider false teaching by a false prophet. I'm thinking YEC needs to be confined to religious schools ONLY and BANNED from the PSS unless restricted to comparative religion as it is NOT Science

  • @biancademonet And I think that is what makes the difference between those that are just complaining, have no real basis for their arguments and those that have a truth-seeking logical mind. They are willing to look at BOTH sides. Y the fear covered with prideful disdain? 1 would think that people would b watching his videos with a fine comb! I've seen Hawkings & Dawking videos, I'm open minded! I dont agree with them on some things I do on others.

  • @biancademonet BTW... A lot of KH's so called fabrications come trom Scripture (word for word in some cases), Science Journals, Scientific American, National Geographic, he quotes noted biloigists and novel prize winning scientists. SO, using your logic I guess thye are all a bunch of liars. The only "proof" u have for YEC is garbage is your opinion, and u back it up by saying u aren't an etheist (and no one is even calling you atheist)!

  • @biancademonet I believe the Bible, Im a YEC-er, I believe in God & Jesus' gift of eternal life, if I were American Id vote republican, Herman Cain would be my pick. I graduated from a world recognized university in Canada, BSc Dregree (Major in Computer Science & Minor in Mathematics) 2 courses short of making it a double-major. So u see, YEC-ers dont have to leave their barin at the door. There! now you know my stand, can you clarify yours? (you probably wont give me the time of day)

  • @erickm16 I am largely "self-educated", much as Abraham Lincoln was. I am an amateur historian, speciallizing in Ancient , Medevial/Renaissance ,American & Russian History and the US Constitution. My views are progressive and I believe in the ABSOLUTE separation of church & state and that the US Constitution TRUMPS the Bible(and ALL "holy books" ) in matters of civil rights.I WILL NOT support ANY politician UNABLE to separate church & state as EXPLICITLY stated in the Constitution

  • @biancademonet "Republican Abraham Lincoln"? "Separation of Church and state" is not mentioned in the constitution, I do believe, like the founding fathers, that the Church is not to be governed by the state, but the state should be governed at least in some way by the church. Godly, Biblically based laws are the ones that protect the individual the most and promote freedom the most. dont believe me? just ask China  I'm not sure what exactly "largely self-educated" means please elaborate .

  • @erickm16 What part of "Congress shall make NO LAW respecting the establishment of religion" do you wannabe theocrats FAIL to comprehend. Try imposing Biblical Sharia law in the USA. Not only will you fail, it will not be fblind obediance that greets you but ..OPEN DEFIANCE and rebellion by freedom loving people. Separation GOES BOTH WAYS! No govt meddling in the church and vice versa unless you WANT to be like Iran, Sudan Saudi Arabia, or Cromwell's England.

  • @biancademonet Y do intelligent-wannabe progressive-puppets keep missing the point on this one? the line mentioned prevents Govmnt from messing with religion (hence the church), it does not imply vice-versa, AND it does not imply total-church-control either, the founding fathers knew that laws with Godly-Biblical, fiundations are key. o/wise it can lead to loss of freedom for some. BTW, all I keep hearing from these same puppets is the extreme and highly unlikely "iran/sudan" scenarios. Fail!

  • Sure buddy. Kent Hovind is the embodiment of all evil. The government is good. Everything they tell us is wondrously true. They would never railroad a dissident.

    And calling someone vulgar names and repeating the lame, dubious accusations against him and putting it to a catchy tune really validates your position. Incontrovertible proof indeed!

    And he most assuredly wrote that book exposing the the corruption in the prison system because he was bored and wanted to make more money.

  • 64 people are braindead fucktards

  • Wow!!! If you listened to any of Kents seminars you would hear that a real Christian is the salt of the earth and salt irritates. I think he succeeded as it seems you guys just wasted a good chunk of your life making something you will have to repent for in the end anyways. You might laugh now but just wait. I hope you make the right decision....

  • i love the song! :O

  • 0:47 looks like the girl is being made of a penis... lool

  • i think you are one of the most dumest person on the earth to do such a thing.

  • NOT SMART YOU ARE

  • you are so gaaaaay.

  • no no no. I disagree with you for once eddy. they didn't want to silence the truth. They are waging this corrupt campaign because you TERRIFY THEM. Don't underestimate the power of denial. They don't know they are suppressing the truth. At least not most of them.

    They are scared shitless. Silencing the opposition is just like admitting you are wrong. oh wait "It's not hypocrisy if you're fighting the devil!" Who said that again?

  • Free thought express. Amazing!!!!! Anyone who doesnt think like you is a fcuktard. Unbelievable!!!! If I dont agree with your THEORY I get attacked. If your parents where trying to create the most disgusting hypocrite, tell them I said congratulations.

  • No anybody who uses illegal means to silence you is a fucktard. Learn to read.

  • @MrYouMustBeJoking Evolution is a fact lol

  • Holy Hell what truth is anyone hiding about evolution? You are delusional.

  • Luke: "They shall lay their hands on you, and persecute you, delivering you up to the synagogues and into prisons, being brought before kings and rulers for my name's sake. And it shall turn to you for a testimony...I will give you a mouth and wisdom which all your adversaries shall not be able to gainsay nor resist...and some of you shall they cause to be put to death. And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake" (21:12-17).

  • Funny the oppostie has happended,most people that speak out against the church were put to death.Again your book say anyone that doesn't belive will call you stupid..well duh

  • You are gauging off the Catholic church(non Christian)not the true church.Please reset your gauges.

  • well do tell what is the true church..I guess the people in the vid i posted are from the real church.kent hovind jail,jimmy swagart jim and tammy,Billy James Hargis, Peter Popoff, he s the guy saod god was talking to him it runed out to be an ear piece.Robert Tilton,Paul Crouch founder TBN,Ted Haggard gay meth user,Joe Barron,Tony Alamo(busted with kiddie porn) are these the true christains you speak of

  • These you mentioned are not following the doctrines of the true church.Most of these you mentioned are false prophets

    according to the bible.

  • they sure are of the true church ,they are the one's that had the power,they are the ones trying to get laws passed.They are the reason religion is dangerous.Most of the weak minded fools out there will do anything people will tell them, as long as they put Jesus in there..."send me your money,jesus needs it"and off go the checks.All the bible is , a way for the strong to control the weak,its always been that way.People are wake'in up to that fact,that is why they stray.Your all false profits

  • I didn't just get off the boat.I've been through the scriptures twice and once backward.God says you shall know them by their fruits.I am a fruit inspector!

    My measuring rod is the bible,the true Word of God.

  • that has got to be in the top 10 dumbest things I have read in a long time..your the fruit inspector..really...LOL too funny.

  • Matthew 7:16-20 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

  • so how did god make bad fruit then...if he is perfect (a good tree) then how did he make bad fruit (satan adam eve all of mankind)

  • Glad the ungodly rap noise can't be played.

  • Get it right people. There is a God and he is real. As for the two fools... Remember thy don't exist their molecules. Have no reason to get upset. When they die they go no where. So the video is pointless and stupid. Ken Hovind made a mistake. However He is still a Man of God. He also will be in Heaven. Yow two guys need to get a full time job. Look under nourish.LOL

  • Kent (not Ken as you like to call him) has never conteded that he made a mistake. He still maintains that as a church he is not bound by the law.

  • Kent, Ken, and kenny. That's between him and God. Why are you bothering me with stupidity.

  • Huh? I'm pretty sure WMG does NOT own the rights to the Kent Hovind is a Dick song.

  • Those two men and only those to men will send their souls to hell. Pity Get a life people. Get it with Christ. The word is real.. You'll soon find out. God loves you... Repent before it's to late...

  • These two guys need to get jobs. Oops I forgot they don't exist.... LOl

  • Comment removed

  • what does evolution have to do with the creation of life? Or the existence of god for that matter. Last time I checked, it was merely described the mechanism behind the diversity of life on earth.

    Get right with education dude.

  • Then I suppose you checked wrong. Perhaps at a creationist website?

    Seriously, evolution only explains how life gets diverse, not how it gets created. Point.

  • Evolution explains the diversity of life. Abiogensis is beginning to explain the origin of life. You should really go to college.

  • Please will you pay my tuition. I would love to Go. I will let you know what college.lol

  • Apply for government loans and grants.

  • It was a joke. lighten up. I have a very good job. Have a great day.

  • HAHAHAHA! That bastard! Too bad there isn't a hell this fucker can burn in. Oh... yeah... sure fabienmaga... yeah, they've been proven wrong... just so we can educate these other idiots... which ones?

  • now fabien is just spamming.

    way to go...

  • Aw, crap! If Fabien is going to spam, I may as well too:

    Congratulations, fabienmaga. You have discovered a great truth that has somehow been overlooked by the entire world scientific community. If I were you, I would contact the editors of "Nature" or "Science" to see when you can publish the startling results of your research. I smell Nobel Prize and, if you are an entertaining speaker, a career as a pundit. Eddy is in entertainment, so perhaps he can put you in touch with an agent.

  • Wow, I had no idea! How could I have missed thousands of scientists publishing articles disproving most of evolution. I should stop living under a rock. You say the remainder will be disproven in a couple of years??? I don't want to miss that either, I feel like such an idiot already. You must really be in the know! Thank you!

  • yeah your a fucktard kent so's the rest of your family. But look on the bright side now that your in jail you're on your knees more than ever

  • Fuck you atheist shitheads.

  • yes beautiful women everywhere please fuck the male atheists, and the attractive men please fuck the women atheists if they want to. Sex is good.

  • you are aware that Theologikos is actually an atheist, right?

  • Eat my dick.

  • okay?

  • That sounds eerily like you're agreeing to eat his dick. lol.

    Btw, eddygoombah, your song is too goddamn catchy. It's stuck in my head.

  • Wow, how very Christian of you.

  • @roxy5512 only if you're a hot chick who's into premarital sex and bondage. :)

  • That made my day.

    Its my new feel good song.

    Thanks a million.

  • I would like to have an album from this song!

    Keep going!

  • This song could be a hit. I love this song.

  • thanks

  • Religions Nut Job Ratings System

    watch?v=02X_TeRZgmg

  • some one make an mp3 of this song.

  • Thanks bro!

  • I looked but I couldn't find it. I had to trouble you but could send me a link? I promise I will play the songs at parties.

  • lol... thank you for posting such a pithy and insightful representation of creationist intelligence.

    wow :/

  • U got a problem?

  • no, I have no problem. You're the one who seems to be full of hate. Or you're just a troll in need of attention. Either way, the problem still does not lie with me, but rather you. I suggest you find some professional counsel.

  • Believe what igorok says or else youre going to hell!!! oh noes!!!

    and while youre at it buy Kents complete 12 box set DVD explaining why everybody else is wrong

  • Yes believe me

  • i agree. these people are sooo stubborn

  • No such thing as evolution its called darwins crapolution or darwilution

  • you made a typo in their channel's url

  • I get it - your saying its the most ironic comment on youtube (stupid) - but in reference to "whats an evolutionist, is that like a gravilist?" is pure stupid. So again, evolutionists dont even know what they are, which makes them stupid (and whiners) -I guess when the evidence of creation is against you, you dont have nothing left to do but mock. (and I thought NEOCONS ONLY MOCKED)

  • No, you didn't understand the comment. Evolutionist is an empty term used by creationists to create some sort of false dichotomy. There is not such thing as an evolutionist outside of the semantic propaganda you use it in. You might as well call someone a "gravitist" since there is as much proof in the theory of gravity as there is evolution. You not understanding this, and then calling someone else stupid is extremely ironic. again... well done.

  • FYI, I also recommend pressing the reply button if you wish to continue to reply to my comments. I'm not implying that you are trying to be devious in any respect, but it can be seen that way by others on YouTube. Hitting reply makes it possible for the person you are making the reply to see your comment, whereas simply commenting on this video below does not do that, and it can seem that you are trying to get the last word in without any criticizing retort from your debatee. Just looking out.

  • I was replying to you... read it

  • again, if you are replying to me, please press the reply button and then comment. I did read it, assuming it was for me, and I replied to it as well. However I was just giving you a heads up since I do not come onto this page everyday. If you hit the reply button though, I would get a message in my inbox regarding each new comment you make. I wasn't trying to be flippant. Just trying to give you some sincere advice to make an already awkward format for debate and discussion a little less awkward

  • hey, youtube police, I pressed the reply button - ok?

  • yeah, there it definitely worked. But your initial replies for some reason weren't getting through to my inbox, so I just assumed. I'm not trying to "police" youtube, I was just kindly suggesting a way to make the conversation a little easier had you not used the reply button.

  • roger

  • sorry dude, didn't realize you were ironicphobic

  • lolwut?

    I guess you didn't get the irony.

  • and stupid

  • "and stupid"

    most ironic comment ever on YouTube... Well done.

  • More Proof Evolutionists are "Whiners"

  • what's an evolutionist? Is that like a Gravitist? or an atomic theorist? Really the term makes no sense other than to the intellectually dishonest proponents of Intelligent design and creationism, people who usually have no real grasp about what it is they apparently hate.

  • Yeah! Preach it brother! All comedy is whining!

  • Man, Hovind isn't even good enough for jail. Someone should have just dumped his ass in the jungle so he could see just how well natural selection really works. If he survived, I bet he wouldn't stay a creationist for long. In fact, that should be an official requirement for all creationists: spend a month in the jungle with nothing but your wits, and if you survive, you can choose whether to still think that an invisible man did it, or whether evolution imbued you with survival skills.

  • Great idea! Think we can get grant money for educational purposes?

  • lol horseshit.

    Kent is a fuckin hack and I hope his ass rots in jail.

  • so?

  • lol.. I used to work for the Federal Bureau of Prisons. I'm thinking about working for them again. Perhaps I'll see Kent. lol

  • lolwut?

  • The smoke of their torment ascendeth up forever and ever and they have NO REST DAY OR NIGHT... There is no peace, saith my God, unto the wicked. Read Ps.5:5. John 8:44-45. When they shall say Peace and safety, sudden destruction cometh upon them. You are worth the spit on the bottom of Judas Iscariot's shoe. You mock the very blood that was shed for you. Be not deceived, God IS NOT MOCKED. For whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. Your delusion is strong and sealed. Beg God for mercy

  • and a 'boogedy boo' to you too

  • "God IS NOT MOCKED"

    Yes, he is.

  • lol

  • to Bookborn

    Were you touching yourself when you wrote that? You were, weren't you?

  • You are a reprobate. I fear for you. You are treasuring up wrath against the day of wrath (Rom. 2). God has sent you a strong delusion (2 Thess. 2 and Isa.66). He has laid a stumbling block in your path and you have fallen for the booby-trapped nature of the Bible. He catches the wise in their own craftiness. You'll be filled with the fruit of your own doings. The spirit that works in you (Eph.2) is helping you to become a vessel of wrath, fitted for destruction (Rom.9). You fell for it.

  • You keep using the bible to back up your statements. The bible is fiction to atheists.  What don't you get about that. Please tell me. What the hell don't you get about that?

  • The Bible says, "For what if some did not believe? Shall their unbelief make the faith of God of none effect? God forbid." You might not believe in trains, and your unbelief will have no bearing on reality when you stay on the tracks. I was an atheist too before I got saved. There are no atheists in hell. You are a cryptotheist, and in your heart of hearts you know there is a God (Romans 1 and Romans 2). You are deceiving yourself with sophistry. 5 secs after death, you'll wish you were right.

  • lol.... i can SEE a train.

  • Why five seconds?

  • What's our "heart of hearts?"

  • the timing on the video is out =/

  • "The Hovinds are spending time researching"

    Could have fooled me. I get the impression of somebody without a high school education. That or a complete and utter retard.

  • LOL this video rocks. "At least The Hovinds are spending time researching and trying to make a difference" LOFL. UMMMM ok, where is their lab? What scientifics breakthroughs have they made? I've researched the origins of life extensively, and Kent Hovind is indeed a FUCKTARD. Hovind's debates are supposed to be about EVOLUTION! not biogenesis or the beginning of the cosmos. He brings up these topics as an obvious strawman to answer evolution questions. Dj, go read a book.

  • "unlike you who logs into Youtube each night to check your comments on the 5 minute joke you made on I'm sure purchased software knowing that you lie to people and probably cheat on your taxes as well."

    Look at that last part. Methinks someone's projecting.

  • Kent Hovind is dishonest, don't you understand that? He was leading a comfortable life and lying out his ass to all those believers out there who, misled though they might be, did nothing to deserve being betrayed by him.

  • hilarious

  • Ok so the controversy is not with the CSE videos but the immature, 10th grade mentality ad hominem video? Actually I wouldn't pull the video - all it does is shows everyone their mentality. Evolutionists can't win debates w/ scientific principles so instead use ad hominem. Personally attack Kent Hovind rather than an adult debate.

    I challenge that the mentality of these people is so unstable and intellectually bankrupt, they can't make a point without puncutating it with the F-bomb.

  • Neither you or Kent Hovind would know a scientific principle if it bit your ass.

    See how your pea brain works: "Someone made a joke video about Hovind! That's all those evil heathens can do!"

    Conveniently you ignore the TENS of THOUSANDS journal papers, the countless confirming lab experiments, and the limitless fruitful medical, agricultural and biological applications (just for starters) all based on a century-and-a-half of granite solid evolutionary science.

    Really? pft!

  • See, you've validated what I said earlier, with ad hominem. No, how the OBSERVATION works, is that videos such as these contribute to 99.9% of the response when someone dares to attack the holy sacred cow of evolutionism. Personal attacks, etc... But this doesn't work anymore. It doesn't feed the bulldog. Somehow, somewhere you'll need to come up with SCIENTIFIC OBSERVATION on evolutionism. And all the red herrings and straw men you supplied dosesn't constitute evidence either.

  • SCIENTIFIC OBSERVATION on evolutionism umm peppered moths studies

  • Peppered moth hoax? You mean the one where they glued dead moths to a tree to fabricate some sort of "evidence for evolution". Even though it is general knowledge this was staged, it is STILL in textbooks today. But, I guess this is only one of the pieces of billions of billions of evidence for evolution. Don't forget Haekel's gill slits on human embryos, or horse evolution. Those are good ones too.

  • hoax the only hoax is by creationist myth saying its a hoax,they weren't dead, and the pics were taken from a enclosed experiment(and that experiment was only conducted to back up 100years of research leading up to it)

  • CiscoWes:

    I really fail to see how dfarmer's comment validates your point. Just because you choose to believe in creationism doesn't make it true. There is absolutely no scientific evidence to support creationism vs. the the millions of pieces of evidence for evolution. The problem with creationists is that they have a distorted view of what evolution actually is. If you want to talk about "strawmen" look at your own viewpoints and see how many there are.

  • Same predictable response. No scientific evidence for Creation (nevermind OBSERVATION of Creation - it's the elephant in the living room but you swear it isn't there) and the countless millions of pieces of evidence for evolution (whatever that is - to hear you guys tell it, it should be literally everywhere - I should be able to go in my back yard and run into this alleged evidence but, it ain't there).

  • But he IS. He's a stealing, lieing fucktard. All of those words fit him, and the video does him no injustice.

  • Hmmm, your first point puts me in mind of someone... can't quite remember the name, but he's a creationist who likes to equate supporters of evolution with Hitler. And accuse debate opponents of "going to hell" for teaching evolution.

    Oh yes, now I remember - it's Kent Hovind I'm thinking of.

    Sorry, what was your point again? Something about how "evolutionists" resort to ad-hom attacks?

  • On your second point, please. It's laughably-obvious that you've simply cherry-picked the worst example you could find - and now you're making vast, sweeping generalizations based on it.

  • oh and its not a ad hominem attack cuz it never states kent is wrong cuz he's a fucktard it only ask if he is 1,and he's wrong cuz he simply is wrong

  • My friends, I fear for you. When you come before God, where will all of your so called logical arguments get you. Will you find cover from the Holy One in you so called understanding of this world? Nothing can save you from His wrath to come but the blood of Christ. Make fun of Him if you will, blaspheme His name, but be warned, He is just.

  • Don't forget merciful.

  • LOL.

  • jonathangunderwood:

    I don't fear this "wrath of God" you speak of b/c I do not believe in a God. Furthermore, this video isn't making fun of Jesus or God or your beliefs, but rather a person who has the same beliefs as you. It amuses me how up in arms creationists get when you don't agree with them.

  • By the way, guys..do you know what happens in july 2013? Kent Hovind will be released from prison, if he's been a good prisoner. If he has gone down on his knees every night to give his cell-mate "Jesus" from Mexico his blow-jobs and so on.. "Amen, Halleluuujah, I'm Coming!!!" Haha! :)

  • "Huminist", "athiest" and so on...hmmm, has a CHRISTTARD come to visit us here again? An illiterate fucktard evangelical christian, maybe? :)

  • ladies and gentlemen... the typical creationist argument. Notice it's obvious strawman and misunderstanding about what science actually says. Notice the fact he authoritatively says "need to" without giving any reason as to why. This is the same as saying "well.... just because." Learn from this example well, so that you may readily recognize it, and then laugh.

  • yep, it would be quite fun but the fact that they want to take over the most powerfull country in the world or at least they want this bullshit teached at schools takes a bit the fun out of it. People with this mentality getting out of schools and getting to positions of power and influence is pretty scary, at least seen from aoutside USA. but is pretty laughable anyway.

  • "Do you really need to make him look bad"

    Yes because it is incredibly funny.

    "So if I distort facts about you, it is ok, as long as you are an ass hole right?"

    If he is an asshole... sure, fine with me. The problem is that agentX6021 is not an asshole.

  • I watched a Kent Hovind video where he said if our eyes could see a broader spectrum we would see "x" rays and the sound coming from a piano.

    Now as most high school students would know that sound is air pressure waves and nothing to do with magnetic/light wave our eyes see.

    The difference in speed of light verses sound also gives a massive clue the 2 different waves are so far seperated, a blind man on a galloping horse could see the difference, suprising an ex science teacher couldn't.

  • wow, u r an idiot. All sound, light, rays, etc. have a wave length. We see a small portion of these wave lengths. All he said is what if our eyes could see the whole spectrum. They say deer see in black and white. If we saw only b&w, u would laugh at anyone who said there was more to see. There is documented reports of people that could see a little bit more on either side of "the light spectrum". Just because u can't see it, doesn't mean it can't be seen.

  • WOW you missed the point, Hovind should know eyes see light waves, and yes if our eyes were created by a designer maybe we would see more than a few percent of the magnetic/light wave spectrum.

    Ears on the other hand detect a few percent of the audio spectrum AIR PRESSURE variations, typically 20 hertz to around 16 kilo hertz.

    Pretty poor design realy when most animals hear a wider bandwith than our ears.

  • For more proof of this, take a video camera and turn on the night vision. Find a computer or phone that has an inferred port that is on. Watch the port with the camera, see those flashes? Why couldn't you see them before? Because your eyes can't see inferred. So how can the camera see what u can't? Apparently the wave lengths outside of our vision are visible, just not to us. Now, what if you could see all of the wave lengths? That is all that Hovind was saying.

  • chrishibbert is referring to is the fact that sound is not a form of light wave. A sound wave only exists within a system that contains enough atmosphere as to be altered by and thus transfer a vibration. This "air vibration" travels through the air and collides with you ear drum, which in turn converts it into electrical impulses to your brain.sound cannot exist in a vacuum, where as all light waves can. But, regardless, the point is moot since it has nothing to do with evolution.

  • Yes remote control units do to even with a $50 dollar camera you can see it, shows you how crap our eyes were "designed".

    And when it comes to our other senses most animals have far better senses, smell, hearing, taste, touch, the fact we are warm blooded and most of the energy we consume is used just for body heat shows a very inefficient "design"

    Even though most animals do have better senses than us they seem not to get a place in heaven?

    What sort of heaven is it? men and women only?