AMD has done a lot over the years. They were first to break 1GHz, dual-core, dodec-core, IMC (no front side bus), 64bit x86, L3 cache, hyper-transport links etc. Athlon XP/64 was far superior to Pentium 4 back in the day ;)
Whoever you prefer, AMD Bulldozer vs. Intel Sandy Bridge will be fun in 2011.
Guys stop bitching about AMD. Their processors do not suck. The Athlon 64 was more expensive than the Pentium 4 HT because it was much faster. Also, I compared the Phenom II 965 BE w/Core i7 940 and the Core i7 wins in the majority of benchmarks, but the Phenom II wins in a few benchmarks (the Phenom II costs $195 and the Core i7 costs $500). Also, AMD has been using the AM2 socket since Athlon 64 so if you want to upgrade to a Phenom, your probably good to go.
@SunnieShine Yah, yah, whatever, I know you're as rich as Bill Gates or Steve Jobs... I'd rather earn money by myself in the future when the computer processors are way better...
AMD'S phenom 965 is only about 6 benchmarks down from the i7 920, which costs nearly £100 more. What are you going to buy? I sure would buy the AMD. (and I have done) I personally think most people just buy intel for the name more than anything.
I buy cause I like my machine to be tiny and run cold while being as powerful as it can be...
I still haven't switched to the i7 arch, and I do not plan to do so until the end of 2010. But my C2D E8500 run very cold and very efficiently in a microATX cubic case, even paired with a power hungry 9600GT...
core i7 is the one of few x86 processor that actually beat risc processor in performance per clock and overall power. others are core 2 and pentium dual core, xeon core.
a core 2 ex6800 is equal to dual core 7ghz powerpc g6.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Intel isn't perfect, you know. Sure its power efficient, but multithreading is a useless feature, and they are too slow. PowerPC processors are much better, they hog power, but are WAY faster than Intel.
core 2 and core i7 had beat crap out of ibm powerpc in last few years. even in performance per power core still gain upper hand, not to mention clock per cycle, core would destroy powerpc.
sure intel was bad, but it was only bad when pentium 4 was around. powerpc had even trouble in video gaming while pentium3 was easily handle any multimedia device/program back to the old day.
so stfu old mac fancy pant. steve jobs had kissed core for years.
Its strange how Apple dissed the Pentium II and Pentium III about 10-13 years ago. And now they say the Core and Core 2 processors, based on the P6 microarchitecture , kick the PowerPC's ass. Imagine a Mac back then running on a Pentium III!!! :D
well pentium 2/3 were consider to be a "false" product that based on p6 architecture due to the scaling issue and lack of IPC(instruction per cycle). but it's all due to intel did not pay attention on p6 as p6 was just a temperary replacement of p5 before netburst can manage to release in 1998. however p6 prove to be more potential than netburst can ever possibly be. then we have core and neleham architecture later on :).
I agree with realpeanut2004, AMD suck for their processors. I hate them, Intel well outlive them and outperform them, and price, I got my Intel equivelent to the Athlon 64 (ie the P4 HT) for far less than I got my Athlon for.
All the phenoms blow mate i was making a computer and ALL benchmarks said that the q6600 (lowest intel processor) owned the most high end phenom x4. FUCK AMD
About the Pentium D, I have seen "Dual core, Do more" with it. Plus I have the Pentium D 925 in the Dell XPS-400 and it handles Crysis on high settings just fine. Plus if it's a single package with two cores in it, it's dual core. Probably not on the same die, but that really doesn't matter. One more thing. GET A HEAT SINK!!!! That works wonders for cooling it off!!
AMD APU FTW
StevensiTX 5 days ago
powerpoint slides are called an "animation" now?
pooky911 3 months ago
Pentium M
EliKnowWonder72 4 months ago
LOL! I HAVE PENTIUM 4!:D
noahluvssveggietales 6 months ago
i7 2600k FTW
3HaloODST 7 months ago
I5 2500k ftw
iXecFTW 7 months ago
i like intel core i 7 better in my opinion
kidreaping 9 months ago
vaya mierda!!!!!!!!!
lolodj1000 9 months ago
OMG! same song
TheXxmad4everxx 1 year ago
i remember hearing this sound when i was little...
pentium III
lolfunnycp 1 year ago
i like core i7 blue
SonicAudiosurf2 1 year ago
mógłby ktos dać link zeby bylo mozna pograc filmikz dzwiekiem tego od 0:13 sekundy??
NexE28 1 year ago
Wow, AMD vs. Intel never ends it seems.
They both do great things!
AMD has done a lot over the years. They were first to break 1GHz, dual-core, dodec-core, IMC (no front side bus), 64bit x86, L3 cache, hyper-transport links etc. Athlon XP/64 was far superior to Pentium 4 back in the day ;)
Whoever you prefer, AMD Bulldozer vs. Intel Sandy Bridge will be fun in 2011.
Aaronage1 2 years ago
Guys stop bitching about AMD. Their processors do not suck. The Athlon 64 was more expensive than the Pentium 4 HT because it was much faster. Also, I compared the Phenom II 965 BE w/Core i7 940 and the Core i7 wins in the majority of benchmarks, but the Phenom II wins in a few benchmarks (the Phenom II costs $195 and the Core i7 costs $500). Also, AMD has been using the AM2 socket since Athlon 64 so if you want to upgrade to a Phenom, your probably good to go.
ikilluish 2 years ago
@ikilluish
Did you just say the i7 wins the majority of the tests? I rest my case.
secret00agent00man 1 year ago
i have Pentium 4 HT, is that good?
LordOfCuteOnes 2 years ago
its excellent especially on windows 7
MultiYippee 2 years ago
i still have a intel pentium I card in my PC
woa12 2 years ago
AMD + ATi = Extreme to be xtreme
halfpol 2 years ago
=Extremely Terrible to be Extremely horrible...
realpeanut2004 2 years ago
Intel + ATi = extreme & powerful!
mmarti944 2 years ago
ATi=AMD (dude, AMD bought ATi ages ago...)
So,
Intel + ATi = Intel + AMD = Epic CRASH
...
realpeanut2004 2 years ago
Yeaa...
But u don't understand me...
I mean (for example) ATi Radeon HD 5970 2GB + Intel Core i7 xxx :)
mmarti944 2 years ago
All expensive stuffs...
I haz no $...
Poor people never understand rich ones...
realpeanut2004 2 years ago
I'm not rich...
If you think about my PC i have:
AMD Athlon XP 2200+ (broken core :P)
1024MB RAM (2x256MB, 1x512MB)
ASRock K7S8Xe rev 3.01
Samsung 80GB
PSU PROComp Lamard KY-400 400W (I mean no-name)
1 DVD, 1 CD-RW
Sapphire Radeon 9200se 128MB 64-bit... etc
mmarti944 2 years ago
@realpeanut2004 Whats your budget then?
oliebol61 1 year ago
@oliebol61 I haven't bought PCs for 2-3 years...
I forgot the budget for my current one, but it's not expensive...
realpeanut2004 1 year ago
@realpeanut2004 i havent for 7 :) lol
Ticomfreak 1 year ago
@realpeanut2004
When you 'haz' no money, go to your mommy and daddy and ask for money!
SunnieShine 1 year ago
@SunnieShine Yah, yah, whatever, I know you're as rich as Bill Gates or Steve Jobs... I'd rather earn money by myself in the future when the computer processors are way better...
realpeanut2004 1 year ago
@realpeanut2004
Wish i was. The computers these days are good enough for gaming, video's, music and much more ofcourse.
SunnieShine 1 year ago
NVIDIA & Intel Rock :D
BennyboyFUCK8 2 years ago
AMD'S phenom 965 is only about 6 benchmarks down from the i7 920, which costs nearly £100 more. What are you going to buy? I sure would buy the AMD. (and I have done) I personally think most people just buy intel for the name more than anything.
Neoplan6o 2 years ago
I buy cause I like my machine to be tiny and run cold while being as powerful as it can be...
I still haven't switched to the i7 arch, and I do not plan to do so until the end of 2010. But my C2D E8500 run very cold and very efficiently in a microATX cubic case, even paired with a power hungry 9600GT...
marlls1989 2 years ago
And ATI Radeon
BennyboyFUCK8 2 years ago
nvidia fuck down!
halfpol 2 years ago
You mean "Suck" ?:D
ATi & Intel ROCK!!
mmarti944 2 years ago
Core i7 is the GOD of all processors. Well compared to my Pentium 4 running Vista with a 2 minute boot time (from sleep mode).
Bus7777 2 years ago
core i7 is the one of few x86 processor that actually beat risc processor in performance per clock and overall power. others are core 2 and pentium dual core, xeon core.
a core 2 ex6800 is equal to dual core 7ghz powerpc g6.
hanrinch 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Intel isn't perfect, you know. Sure its power efficient, but multithreading is a useless feature, and they are too slow. PowerPC processors are much better, they hog power, but are WAY faster than Intel.
ChangeWeCantBeliveIn 2 years ago
True, but Intel has a lot of money and waiting for AMD running out of money...
So, you can say Intel is evil...
realpeanut2004 2 years ago
Well the Core 2 Duos aren't bad. I will have to admit PowerPC is AWESOME but some of the recent Intels aren't TOO bad.
DeltaPhi79 2 years ago
core 2 and core i7 had beat crap out of ibm powerpc in last few years. even in performance per power core still gain upper hand, not to mention clock per cycle, core would destroy powerpc.
sure intel was bad, but it was only bad when pentium 4 was around. powerpc had even trouble in video gaming while pentium3 was easily handle any multimedia device/program back to the old day.
so stfu old mac fancy pant. steve jobs had kissed core for years.
hanrinch 2 years ago
Its strange how Apple dissed the Pentium II and Pentium III about 10-13 years ago. And now they say the Core and Core 2 processors, based on the P6 microarchitecture , kick the PowerPC's ass. Imagine a Mac back then running on a Pentium III!!! :D
ikilluish 2 years ago
well pentium 2/3 were consider to be a "false" product that based on p6 architecture due to the scaling issue and lack of IPC(instruction per cycle). but it's all due to intel did not pay attention on p6 as p6 was just a temperary replacement of p5 before netburst can manage to release in 1998. however p6 prove to be more potential than netburst can ever possibly be. then we have core and neleham architecture later on :).
again, the fail of p2/p3 was the scaling issue.
hanrinch 2 years ago
Oh... sorry... I didn't notice that is a spam...
realpeanut2004 2 years ago
P3 for the win! That had the best ad, Core 2's is really smart, but the sound for the P3 was the best!!!
jamiebalfour04 2 years ago
I7, you see it, you want it.
slaterking1000 2 years ago 2
Cire i7 O_O me whaaaants...have no money...whants job
knaksen3 2 years ago 2
way better for BBQ~
realpeanut2004 2 years ago
Comment removed
Gtavicecity1000 2 years ago
Those aren't the animations.
Hildron101010 2 years ago
Core i7!
Bus7777 2 years ago
i7!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Firminator128 2 years ago 2
Why is the core I7 Louder then a C2D sound? -_-'
easyaslars 2 years ago
Because he probably got the audio from a shitty website.
ikilluish 2 years ago
those are just logos...
i thought you meant animation as in the moving ones that they put at the end of their commercials... :(
d3jsp 2 years ago
I like Pentium IV sound!
rocools 2 years ago
Intel inside!!
tahitiinspirethenext 2 years ago
Nice!
easyaslars 2 years ago
lush sounds]
Dannybwoii2k9 2 years ago
AMD WINS
Dannybwoii2k9 2 years ago
why
tiger3312 2 years ago
why does the core 2 duo sound so softt
xXxmidgexXx 2 years ago
The Core 2 duo is HOTT, the i7 is HOTTer.
gunpder94 2 years ago
The Pentium 4 is smokin!
(literally, feel a heatsink of one)
TheGeek1028 2 years ago
Not the real animations
retrooldschool 2 years ago
Intel inside
idiot outside!
Macintosh3745 2 years ago
i have a pentium 4 in my windows 7 pc :D it still plays l4d and crysis
oliebol61 2 years ago
pentium 4 ftw! the P4 sound is the best IMO
theodorgh 3 years ago
i like the Intel Pentium 3 animation
maxsuperdudeisawesom 3 years ago
This is old
observerclub 3 years ago
Forgot the Intel Atom
mavericksfan1985 3 years ago
There wasn't Intel Atom until I finished this vid
realpeanut2004 3 years ago
vhere is celeron and quad core
??????????
Mindac 3 years ago
Both SUCK!!!
Celeron: the cheapest processor
Core 2 Quad: FAKE quad core(if you want a quad core processor, please use Core i7)
realpeanut2004 3 years ago
Intel Core 2 Quad exists.
DeltaPhi79 3 years ago
exists but SUCKS
realpeanut2004 3 years ago
Hmm.....then maybe when i get a new computer i'll either get one with a i7 or put an i7 in it.
DeltaPhi79 3 years ago
C2Q? Not really...
TheGeek1028 2 years ago
Pentium 4 ^_^
civettax 3 years ago
The P4 animation/sound wins.
zimtower 3 years ago
Intel is noobish. AMD Rules!
Davpronk 3 years ago
AMD SUCKS!!!
(AMD+ATI=DAMIT)
realpeanut2004 3 years ago
Just wait for the new Phenom II's.
Davpronk 3 years ago
STILL SUCKS!!!
(Core i7 is even better than Phenom II)
realpeanut2004 3 years ago
Yeah, but AMD is still better in terms of price/performance.
Davpronk 3 years ago
Still, Intel has THE MAJORITY of the market share of processors!!!
(AMD might close down sooner or later if there is no other revolutionary processors)
realpeanut2004 3 years ago
I agree with realpeanut2004, AMD suck for their processors. I hate them, Intel well outlive them and outperform them, and price, I got my Intel equivelent to the Athlon 64 (ie the P4 HT) for far less than I got my Athlon for.
jamiebalfour04 3 years ago
All the phenoms blow mate i was making a computer and ALL benchmarks said that the q6600 (lowest intel processor) owned the most high end phenom x4. FUCK AMD
assasincomedy 3 years ago
Your arguments are so funny and sad =D
peekaduh 3 years ago
Todays one is pretty good.
OfficialMrFunguin 3 years ago
About the Pentium D, I have seen "Dual core, Do more" with it. Plus I have the Pentium D 925 in the Dell XPS-400 and it handles Crysis on high settings just fine. Plus if it's a single package with two cores in it, it's dual core. Probably not on the same die, but that really doesn't matter. One more thing. GET A HEAT SINK!!!! That works wonders for cooling it off!!
my9laptops0better 3 years ago
oh, you miss pentium D..
cyther39 3 years ago
Pentium D SUCKS!
Do you mean that you love the hottest processor that can burn your PC (Pentium D)?
realpeanut2004 3 years ago
but it is the first dual core processor!!
it's a history man!
cyther39 3 years ago 2
you... mean... even... FAKE dual core processor can be counted as REAL dual core processor like Core 2 Duo??
realpeanut2004 3 years ago
how can u tell it's Fake!!! huh!
cyther39 3 years ago
Pentium D: 2 processors but NOT working with each other (i.e. NOT optimized)
Core 2 Duo: 2 processors REALLY working with each other (i.e. FULLY optimized)
PS: some Core 2 Duo Ads include a slogan: "Dual Core, Do more." Have you seen this slogan in any Intel ads about Pentium D???
realpeanut2004 3 years ago
u frogot teh celeron >.>
tauio111 3 years ago
CELERON SUCKS so I didn't add it to this vid
realpeanut2004 3 years ago
This isnt the animations! its just the logos with the theme
joecool280 3 years ago
nice vid!
lugia450 3 years ago
thanks!
realpeanut2004 3 years ago