Grazie, Pamela. Che gusto, che eleganza, che musica… e lei… la sua voce, il suo garbo, la sua tenerezza indifesa dai propri dubbi… lui no, te lo lascio tutto, se vuoi; niente, nel suo tono, nella voce, esprime quel che le parole, da lei forzate, dicono.
a neophyte to the world of international cinema, im in love with les mepris. the plot the dialogue the scenery the symbolism the characters (Bardot!) godard made an outstanding film here. this is cinema that is saying something. not just explosions gunfights and skanks takin clothes off (all good things) but this has a message. philosophy the arts the gods all come up. im diggin this movie, any other films that are like this?
@munnytome ever watched movies by eric rohmer, they basically apear to have a similar style of telling stories, even though rohmers films have a different aesthetic . but see if like his "circle des 4 saisons" . cheers
"Contempt" is one of the greatest films of all time. BB, Jack Palance, M. Piccoli, Fritz Lang, all absolutely amazing. Godard is a genius. How they got the cameras up to that house still baffles me.
And "Jackie Brown" is by far the finest film Tarantino has created. That movie kills me every single time, and I've seen it countless times. Can't understand why the masses don't understand the brilliance of all the performers. Amazing.
@the uploader: You seriously think this is not as good as Pulp Fiction? Or not as important in the "timeline of cinema"? I am by no means a Tarantino-hater, there are many current highbrow-directors like Haneke I do really hate, but if T. ever made really great work it's "Jackie Brown". But this one, Le Mépris, is one of the greatest works of the past century and even comparing it to Pulp Fiction or Godard with Tarantino is a silly thing to do, to say the least.
still, godard would need to be in that timeline somewhere... the french new wave directors are surely just as important as the italian neorealists and other movements. it's not about individual directors, it's about movements. tarantino shouldn't be in the list. he just emulates and amplifies mainstream cinema, very little of his films is truly original. thumbs up for godard, and every nation's film output!
Either way you look at the time line, movements or individuals QT is still, probably, the most important movie maker of the time. along with Roberto Rodriguez, Lawrence Bender, Steve Buscemi and many others of his "movement" - changed the way people perceive movies in a way only de palma, scorsese and copola did a generation earlier (in the US). but whatever.. to each his own.
Not to be rude, and this may also be a bit too late of a response, but what? Fellini, Bergman, Godard, Kurosawa? Tarantino will never, I repeat, never, be classified on that level. Americans film to make money, Europeans and Asians (even South Americans) promote an art.
@whynot77777777 you are talking in generalizations and thats not really intelligent. it is true that hollywood is more of an industry with money making in mind but there is a huge independent cinema and film makers in the USA that are making movies and film for the love of art and not for the love of money, just because you are not familiar with them doesnt mean they do not exist. plus, read film history and you will find out how many american film makers made cinema with a pure heart and mind.
American cinema glorifies the money making aspect. Do not be so naive as to say it is not true. When do you hear about independent films on television or on the news? I have been to many different countries and I can say that art for the sake of art is promoted in Europe/Asia/South America more.
PS: Calling someone out on intelligence when the probability that they are more literate (see your grammar above) and go to a pretty good university is rather ignorant. Logical fallacy :)
@icsprks Tarantino is very creative and interesting but still his films are collages influenced by the 2.0 era. Nouvelle vague and neorrealists, expresionists, etc were truly revolutions in cinematographic language.
haha! the french have surely never been accused of pretension, they are a modest race with little interest in existential matters portrayed through the medium of stylish cinema... oh wait... great upload by the way, you got anything from vivra sa vie?
This is such a very wrong opinion you have not about modesty necessarily but about existentialist matter , that s a long list of movies you have to watch try a francois truffaud or a pagnol movie
I don't think that the Shining is great and I do not see Kubrick's work as less commercial or more artsy then any other American director and I do not think there is anything wrong with commercial cinema - if I understand correctly what you mean using the vague term "Cinema Artist".
I know at least 5 American directors that created excellent cinema that was also very successful in the box office, in fact, I think that more then half of the big American directors of our times (or anytime) were no money slaves (and lets not confuse money with success).
nobody's putting anybody down. The ordering of the divines operates naturally. No masses could ever undo the scheme of the God's. That scheme which puts Godard and the French on the top of good cinema.
@filmfanatic99 you act as if there aren't any good ones. americans history of cinema is far bigger than any other countries, therefore a lot more directors, and there are truly a lot of great ones. as there are truly a lot of great foreign directors.
it was a little pretentious of you to disregard the shining, it may be a lesser work from kubrick but it's still regarded as a work with high artistic qualities. i am in agreement though that contempt surpasses it :D
It might not be a great movie without any regards to anything, simply by itself. and if it is being regarded as a work with high qualities by books and critics.. well.. no body is perfect...
I don't think it is good enough to use as a meaningful point of reference on the time line of cinema as let's say.. Pulp Fiction or "Les enfants du paradis" by Marcel Carné /Jacques Prévert.
Je t'aime totalement, tendrement, tragiquement.
TheMercredid 1 day ago
Thank you Ali Ikram...
JimmyCaravan 5 months ago
Grazie, Pamela. Che gusto, che eleganza, che musica… e lei… la sua voce, il suo garbo, la sua tenerezza indifesa dai propri dubbi… lui no, te lo lascio tutto, se vuoi; niente, nel suo tono, nella voce, esprime quel che le parole, da lei forzate, dicono.
GianMarcoTavazzani 7 months ago
I wonder if Godard drew any inspiration from Andy Warhol with the changing colors thing....
jmf459 7 months ago
a neophyte to the world of international cinema, im in love with les mepris. the plot the dialogue the scenery the symbolism the characters (Bardot!) godard made an outstanding film here. this is cinema that is saying something. not just explosions gunfights and skanks takin clothes off (all good things) but this has a message. philosophy the arts the gods all come up. im diggin this movie, any other films that are like this?
munnytome 8 months ago
@munnytome ever watched movies by eric rohmer, they basically apear to have a similar style of telling stories, even though rohmers films have a different aesthetic . but see if like his "circle des 4 saisons" . cheers
Fyyar1 1 week ago
... j'adore cette video... c'est une scène culte du film... il l'aime "totalement" c'est beau.... ;)
unasensualita 8 months ago
paradoxically, although the film is named "contempt", this scene makes me want to believe in love. simply pure emotion, tenderness
HustlerPumpkin 11 months ago
Godard's great masterpiece. And Brigitte Bardot is delicious.
ateniense7 1 year ago
@Don Farshido
You made my day.
"Contempt" is one of the greatest films of all time. BB, Jack Palance, M. Piccoli, Fritz Lang, all absolutely amazing. Godard is a genius. How they got the cameras up to that house still baffles me.
And "Jackie Brown" is by far the finest film Tarantino has created. That movie kills me every single time, and I've seen it countless times. Can't understand why the masses don't understand the brilliance of all the performers. Amazing.
esquibelle 1 year ago
Cette scène me serre la gorge à chaque fois (avec la musique !), et je ne sais pas exactement pourquoi !
AlainNaigeon 1 year ago
this was my first Godard film.. walked in to the theater, sat down and was in tears within five minutes..
yodder89 1 year ago
Cette scène dans le lit,je ne m'en lasse pas!!
tedybear335 1 year ago
Das ist Kunst. Alleine der Vorspann. Die Idee, einen hochwertigen Film in mehreren relevanten Sprachen zu bringen, sollte Schule machen.
ralphomat 1 year ago
le plus beau traveling du Cinéma, avec ceux de
"La soif du mal" de Orson Welles et "le locataire de Roman Polanski.
merci Monsieur Godard.
ODUSSEUS69 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Un des plus beau travelling du cinéma, avec ceux de:
"La soif du mal" de Welles
"Le locataire"de Polanski.
Monsieur Jean-Luc Godard, mille merci.
ODUSSEUS69 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Un des plus beau travelling du cinéma, avec ceux de:
"La soif du mal" de Orson Welles
"Le locataire" Norman Polanski.
Monsieur Jean-Luc Godard, mille merci.
ODUSSEUS69 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Un des plus beau travelling du cinéma, avec ceux de:
"La soif du mal" de Orson Welles
"Le locataire" Norman Polanski.
Monsieur Jean-Luc Godard, mille merci.
Odusseus
ODUSSEUS69 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
un des plus beau travelling du cinéma, avec ceux de:
"La soif du mal" de Orson Welles
"Le locataire" Norman Polanski.
Monsieur Jean-Luc Godard, mille merci.
ODUSSEUS69 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
un des plus beau travelling du cinéma, avec ceux de:
"La soif du mal" de Orson Welles
"Le locataire" Norman Polanski.
Monsieur Jean-Luc Godard, mille merci.
ODUSSEUS69 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
un des plus beau travelling du cinéma, avec ceux de:
"La soif du mal" de Orson Welles
"Le locataire" Norman Polanski.
Monsieur Jean-Luc Godard, mille merci.
ODUSSEUS69 1 year ago
Reflexive cues of 'Americain' contempt for intimate space created by a mechanical gaze
ROTEsimplemachines 1 year ago
Comment removed
moegossard 1 year ago
like from 1:45 on
Mfraser0613 1 year ago
*****
MssCucamonga 1 year ago
2:28
MZRN1661 1 year ago
Don Farshido, you are completement right. Completement! Les miracles se trouvent pres de nous, meme qu'il y a presque 50 ans que ce film a ete fait.
podiboq 1 year ago
In love with the section starting at 2:27
BornCrying 1 year ago
@the uploader: You seriously think this is not as good as Pulp Fiction? Or not as important in the "timeline of cinema"? I am by no means a Tarantino-hater, there are many current highbrow-directors like Haneke I do really hate, but if T. ever made really great work it's "Jackie Brown". But this one, Le Mépris, is one of the greatest works of the past century and even comparing it to Pulp Fiction or Godard with Tarantino is a silly thing to do, to say the least.
DonFarshido 1 year ago 8
@DonFarshido Very true. The last two words of the film would resolve such comparisons: "Silencio. Silencio".
oorgah 1 year ago
@DonFarshido This isn't one of Godard's best. Not nearly as good as BREATHLESS or THE MARRIED WOMAN.
goback3spaces 1 year ago
still, godard would need to be in that timeline somewhere... the french new wave directors are surely just as important as the italian neorealists and other movements. it's not about individual directors, it's about movements. tarantino shouldn't be in the list. he just emulates and amplifies mainstream cinema, very little of his films is truly original. thumbs up for godard, and every nation's film output!
notahope 1 year ago 9
Either way you look at the time line, movements or individuals QT is still, probably, the most important movie maker of the time. along with Roberto Rodriguez, Lawrence Bender, Steve Buscemi and many others of his "movement" - changed the way people perceive movies in a way only de palma, scorsese and copola did a generation earlier (in the US). but whatever.. to each his own.
and yeah thumbs up for great films!
icsprks 1 year ago
yeah, tis all a matter of taste at the end of the day, and whether a director is influential or not, can only be seen when looking back.
notahope 1 year ago
@icsprks
Not to be rude, and this may also be a bit too late of a response, but what? Fellini, Bergman, Godard, Kurosawa? Tarantino will never, I repeat, never, be classified on that level. Americans film to make money, Europeans and Asians (even South Americans) promote an art.
whynot77777777 6 months ago 2
@whynot77777777 you are talking in generalizations and thats not really intelligent. it is true that hollywood is more of an industry with money making in mind but there is a huge independent cinema and film makers in the USA that are making movies and film for the love of art and not for the love of money, just because you are not familiar with them doesnt mean they do not exist. plus, read film history and you will find out how many american film makers made cinema with a pure heart and mind.
icsprks 6 months ago
@icsprks
American cinema glorifies the money making aspect. Do not be so naive as to say it is not true. When do you hear about independent films on television or on the news? I have been to many different countries and I can say that art for the sake of art is promoted in Europe/Asia/South America more.
PS: Calling someone out on intelligence when the probability that they are more literate (see your grammar above) and go to a pretty good university is rather ignorant. Logical fallacy :)
whynot77777777 6 months ago
@whynot77777777
And thank you providing a good laugh for my film class. They all definitely agreed Tarantino is the greatest (heavy sarcasm). Ciao mate.
whynot77777777 6 months ago
@whynot77777777 okay whatever you are correct american cinema is trash. now go and get a job or something.
icsprks 6 months ago
@whynot77777777 you are absolutely right.
on that level europeans are superior.
Sakirben 3 months ago
@whynot77777777 Sorry but you're talking about just one aspect of american cinema, Hollywood, and that's a very stupid shortcut.
bennyfromthe72 2 months ago
@icsprks Tarantino is very creative and interesting but still his films are collages influenced by the 2.0 era. Nouvelle vague and neorrealists, expresionists, etc were truly revolutions in cinematographic language.
seisdecorazones 5 months ago
@icsprks An "ass" is a donkey. The proper word is "arse" if you are translating the French word for butt
.
electrictroy2010 1 month ago
Ein guter Moment Filmgeschichte. Filetstück für Cineasten. Zeitlos. Kunstwerk.
(Sparsamer, gezielter Einsatz von Grundfarben.)
ralphomat 2 years ago
haha! the french have surely never been accused of pretension, they are a modest race with little interest in existential matters portrayed through the medium of stylish cinema... oh wait... great upload by the way, you got anything from vivra sa vie?
Gazs93 2 years ago
This is such a very wrong opinion you have not about modesty necessarily but about existentialist matter , that s a long list of movies you have to watch try a francois truffaud or a pagnol movie
zaodizao 2 years ago
a) you can't spell
b) you can't detect sarcasm
Gazs93 2 years ago
Best. Opening. Ever.
otherfool 2 years ago 17
totally agree with that. Never seen so much quality in an opening. Even Shining's opening isn't that good!
spiritofgabriel 2 years ago
If the Shinning is our point of reference for good cinema... well.. we might have an embarrassing situation.
icsprks 2 years ago
Both the Shining and Contempt are great. Kubrick is the closest America has as a cinema artist. Most American directors are for hire.
filmfanatic99 2 years ago
I don't think that the Shining is great and I do not see Kubrick's work as less commercial or more artsy then any other American director and I do not think there is anything wrong with commercial cinema - if I understand correctly what you mean using the vague term "Cinema Artist".
icsprks 2 years ago
I know at least 5 American directors that created excellent cinema that was also very successful in the box office, in fact, I think that more then half of the big American directors of our times (or anytime) were no money slaves (and lets not confuse money with success).
icsprks 2 years ago
Whoa. Kubrick is amazing. Shining is amazing. This film is amazing.
Crazy French New Wave addicts need to stop downplaying everything else, no matter how good godard is, and believe me, he's good.
weirdhotshot 2 years ago
nobody's putting anybody down. The ordering of the divines operates naturally. No masses could ever undo the scheme of the God's. That scheme which puts Godard and the French on the top of good cinema.
Rachegotter 2 years ago
while I was hoping for an intelligent discussion I ended up with pile of a non elegant arguments which left me with nothing but a sense of contempt.
icsprks 2 years ago
@filmfanatic99 you act as if there aren't any good ones. americans history of cinema is far bigger than any other countries, therefore a lot more directors, and there are truly a lot of great ones. as there are truly a lot of great foreign directors.
17Valjeans 2 years ago
it was a little pretentious of you to disregard the shining, it may be a lesser work from kubrick but it's still regarded as a work with high artistic qualities. i am in agreement though that contempt surpasses it :D
Gazs93 2 years ago
It might not be a great movie without any regards to anything, simply by itself. and if it is being regarded as a work with high qualities by books and critics.. well.. no body is perfect...
I don't think it is good enough to use as a meaningful point of reference on the time line of cinema as let's say.. Pulp Fiction or "Les enfants du paradis" by Marcel Carné /Jacques Prévert.
icsprks 2 years ago
great movie..a classic..j'ai lu un des film prefere d'actrice francaise Nathalie Baye:)
we have good taste:)
travisangeli 2 years ago
beautiful i love i love i love a true classic
polinkasuperova 2 years ago
3 min del culo de Brigitte Bardot... creo que subestimé el cine intelectual, Godard SE LA BANCAAA
Juanma16490 2 years ago
the music just wraps you up and carries you away....
haasxaar 2 years ago
True.
icsprks 2 years ago
Un des moments parmi les plus touchants de l'histoire du cinéma. Ce film est un véritable cadeau.
reveurealiste 2 years ago
merci,
j'aime le cinema de jean luc godard.
je revenu au mon passé et je veux moi-même au cinema de porto alegre.
mon professeur balthazar 1 fois.
merci mademoiselle,
antonio
paduaprs 2 years ago
I love you totally, tenderly, tragically
llickthestars 2 years ago 15
you can find the music on the soundtrack to Martin Scorsese's "Casino"
luzecky 2 years ago
It's called Theme De Camille. The second song. It was used during the credits of Casino. Great stuff.
Rarab2 2 years ago
Does any one know the name of this opening song?
Pierrestoy 3 years ago
@Pierrestoy It's the music specifically written for the film by Georges Delarue
AlainNaigeon 1 year ago
What is the music at 3:03 please.
edmund184 3 years ago
la musique c'est theme de camille de georges delerue
Aggelos14 3 years ago
This is one of the most beautiful pieces of cinema ever made. Thanks for posting this with the English subtitles.
luzecky 3 years ago 5
True. I warmly agree with that statement.
icsprks 3 years ago
I agree too. Just to see this scene and to say Godard is great.
victor170769 3 years ago